Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards...
-
Upload
zoe-bishop -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
3
Transcript of Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards...
![Page 1: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards
Kenneth DavisDepartment of Meteorology
The Pennsylvania State University
Co-chair, NACP Science Steering Group
NACP 4th All Investigators’ MeetingAlbuquerque, New Mexico
4-7 February, 2013
![Page 2: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
outline
• Origins, goals and structure of the NACP• Progress, problems, changes• Paths forwards
– Challenges, opportunities
![Page 3: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Origins, goals and structure of the NACP
![Page 4: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Relevant documents, groups, and programs• USGCRP – U.S. Global Change Research Program• NACP – North American Carbon Program• CCIWG - Carbon Cycle Interagency Working Group• U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan, Sarmiento and Wofsy, 1999• CCSSG - Carbon Cycle Science Steering Group• NACP Plan, Harriss, Wofsy et al., 2002.• NACP SSG – NACP Science Steering Group• OCB - Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry Program• OCB SSG – OCB Science Steering Group• NACP Science Implementation Strategy, Denning et al., 2005• CarboNA - collaboration with Mexican and Canadian research
efforts• U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan, Michalak, Marland, Sabine, Jackson et al,
2011
http://www.nacarbon.org http://www.carboncyclescience.gov
![Page 5: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
US Carbon Cycle Science Plan Goals, 1999
1. Quantify and understand the Northern Hemisphere terrestrial carbon sink.
2. Quantify and understand the uptake of anthropogenic CO2 in the ocean.
3. Determine the impacts of past and current land use on the carbon budget.
4. Provide greatly improved projections of future atmospheric concentrations of CO2.
5. Develop the scientific basis for societal decisions about management of CO2 and the carbon cycle.
Origin of the NACP
Origin of OCB
CCSP 1999 led to the creation of the NACP and OCB. Additional goals didn’t create specific research programs.
![Page 6: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
CCSSG and program
office
NACP (SSG, program
office)
Syntheses(e.g. NACP interim
syntheses)
Intensives(e.g. MCI)
Meeting committees (e.g.
NACP AIM organization)
OCB (SSG, program
office)
CarboNA(SSG)
CCIWG
Program structure(detail limited to the NACP)
![Page 7: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Implementation Strategy, 2005
NACP Questions1. What is the carbon balance of North America and
adjacent oceans? What are the geographic patterns of fluxes of CO2, CH4, and CO? How is the balance changing over time? (“Diagnosis”)
2. What processes control the sources and sinks of CO2, CH4, and CO, and how do the controls change with time? (“Attribution”)
3. Are there potential surprises (could sources increase or sinks disappear)? (“Prediction”)
4. How can we enhance and manage long-lived carbon sinks ("sequestration"), and provide resources to support decision makers? (“Decision support”)
Current marching orders for the NACP.
![Page 8: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
NACP Approach
Observations
Observations & Experiments Science Results Estimates-Uncertainties
Predictive Models
Experiments
Diagnostic Models
Model-Data Fusion
Dynamic Maps
Decision Support
diagnosis
prediction
attribution
![Page 9: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Castle figure, with observations, experiments, process understanding at the base, prediction as the second floor, and decision support at the tower top. Some clouds in the way.
• Indicate terrestrial and marine systems.• Note feedback.
![Page 10: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
What decisions are we supporting?
• Climate and carbon management choices– Provide the scientific basis for decision makers to enact
effective policy choices regarding managing future climate change and ecosystem changes associated with changing atmospheric CO2 and CH4. Focus on prediction.
• Regulatory support– Provide the scientific basis needed to determine the
effectiveness of measures taken to manage CO2 and CH4 sources and sinks. Provide methods that can quantify sources, sinks and stocks with the accuracy and precision required to support regulations. Focus on diagnosis.
![Page 11: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
NACP research community development to date
• Community meetings– AmeriFlux meetings– All Investigators’ Meetings
• 2007 Colorado Springs• 2009 San Diego• 2011 New Orleans• 2013 Albuquerque
– (Also TRANSCOM meetings, ICDCs, AGU sessions…)• NACP Program office
– Web site– List of investigations / investigators
• Data management (ORNL DAAC, MAST-DC, CDIAC)
![Page 12: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Major NACP research initiatives that have been completed
• Midcontinent Intensive (MCI) regional study, 2005-2009 field work
• Test of top-down and bottom-up diagnostic methods. Basis for evaluating the expansion of the N. American observational network.
• Syntheses, 2008-2012– NACP interim syntheses – regional and site, focus on
data through 2006– Coastal, non-CO2 GHG, disturbance syntheses
![Page 13: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Progress, problems, changes
![Page 14: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Progress• The MCI worked! • Many (~30?) multi-year, continental C balance
estimates have been brought together and evaluated.
• A follow-on continental C model comparison project (MSTMIP) is underway.
• Many N. American flux tower sites (30+) with multi-year records have been used to evaluate ~30 different terrestrial biosphere models.
• Extensive progress has been made in terrestrial disturbance studies.
![Page 15: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
(more) Progress
• Strong progress has been made synthesizing our knowledge of the coastal ocean carbon cycle.
• Carbon Tracker continues to function. • Carbon Tracker methane exists.• Strong progress has been made in carbon cycle
data assimilation.• Remote GHG column data is being acquired,
and more is on the way!
![Page 16: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
(more) Progress
• CO2 and CH4 sensor technology (in situ and remote) has advanced considerably.
• Long-term flux tower data will be supported.– AmeriFlux will support a core “facility” of flux
tower sites.– NEON will add more long-term flux tower sites.
• NGEEs (next generation ecosystem experiments) are under development. Tundra and tropics.
![Page 17: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
(more) Progress
• Observational / experimental design studies are being used more actively.
• New research activities / intensives are focusing on vulnerable C stocks in high latitudes (NGEE, CARVE, ABOVE).
• New research / intensives are focusing on anthropogenic emissions (INFLUX, megacities).
• Years of NOAA aircraft and TCCON column data have been acquired over N. America.
![Page 18: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
(more) Progress
• A strong U.S. carbon cycle science research community has developed.
• A new carbon cycle science plan was written.• The CCIWG has survived the reorganization of
the USGCRP.• Considerable research on terrestrial carbon
management / decision support is underway.
![Page 19: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Changes• U.S. CO2 emissions are dropping.• California and the EPA are regulating GHG
emissions.• Shale gas extraction has grown dramatically / gas
leakage is a significant new issue.• The age of satellite CO2 and CH4 measurement is
upon us.• A private-sector GHG measurement network exists.• Considerable interest in methods to measure
anthropogenic GHG emissions has emerged from the US government.
![Page 20: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Problems• NOAA’s tower network has not been
expanded.• We have not converged on estimates of the N.
American carbon balance. • Terrestrial biosphere models did not perform
well vs. the N. American flux tower record.• Carbon cycle prognostic skill is still poor.• Transport uncertainty is still a major challenge
for atmospheric inversions.
![Page 21: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
(more) Problems• Knowledge of the coastal carbon cycle has many
holes / uncertainties.• Global remote sensing of biomass needs to be
developed.• Remote GHG column data faces questions
regarding biases.• Impact of the CCSP is unclear. • Integration of natural and social sciences is still
quite limited.• NACP investigators struggle with data
management.
![Page 22: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
NACP to date
• The NACP is rich in diagnostic studies– Numerous individual studies– Sophisticated syntheses emerging– Convergence is elusive. We’re far from
“done”• Progress has been made re: attribution, i.e. what are the factors
governing the N. American carbon balance?– Significant uncertainty remains.
• Predictive studies are less abundant.– Syntheses are limited to global studies. Predictive skill is poor.
• Decision support research is sparse. Practical impact of the NACP is uncertain.
![Page 23: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Two paths forwards
![Page 24: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
In the coming years our community should:
• Expand our research agenda to include human systems (economics, energy systems, urban systems, land use, policy and behavioral studies) – Human systems govern the carbon cycle at least as
much as marine and terrestrial processes.– This cuts across all NACP goals – diagnosis, attribution,
prediction and decision support. • Advance our ability to predict the future carbon
cycle.– This cuts across all NACP disciplines – coastal, terrestrial
and human systems.
![Page 25: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
NACP Approach
Observations
Observations & Experiments Science Results Estimates-Uncertainties
Predictive Models
Experiments
Diagnostic Models
Model-Data Fusion
Dynamic Maps
Decision Support
diagnosis
prediction
attribution
![Page 26: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Logic for a new USCCSP, 2011
• “While many of the research goals in the 1999 Science Plan remain important for the coming decade, new research thrusts are also needed. These thrusts include:– a more comprehensive look at the effects of humans on
carbon cycling, including the consequences of carbon management activities;
– the direct impacts of CO2 on ecosystems and their vulnerability or resilience to changes in carbon and climate;
– a quantitative understanding of the uncertainties associated with the carbon cycle; and
– the need to coordinate researchers from the natural and social sciences to address societal concerns.”
![Page 27: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
New US Carbon Cycle Science Plan Questions, 2011
• Question 1. How do natural processes and human actions affect the carbon cycle on land, in the atmosphere, and in the oceans?
(first path)
• Question 2. How do policy and management decisions affect the levels of the primary carbon-containing gases, carbon dioxide and methane, in the atmosphere?
• Question 3. How are ecosystems, species, and natural resources impacted by increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, the associated changes in climate, and by carbon management decisions?
(second path)
![Page 28: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Challenge
• Can we broaden our science and increase our focus on prediction with so many problems at the base of our structure?– One option – don’t broaden the science we address –
that will stretch resources and endanger our base –diagnoses, and marine and terrestrial science.
– A better option – broaden the research community. Bring in new resources. While also patching existing holes and converging on pending research problems.
– A poor option – expand our science while letting our base of coastal and terrestrial science decay.
![Page 29: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Examples: essential work to strengthen the base
• Pursue closure in the N. American carbon balance.
• Pursue expanded and secure coastal and terrestrial observational and experimental networks.
• Launch new research efforts to reduce transport uncertainty in atmospheric inversions.
• Improve terrestrial biosphere models’ ability to simulate the continental flux tower record.
• Build stronger data management resources.
![Page 30: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Challenge
• Can we make progress rapidly enough to serve decision support needs? Is our work relevant to carbon management needs?– Yes! Our results are already guiding decisions.
• Emissions reductions needed for climate stabilization• Leakage rates that make CH4 problematic for GHG load• Current magnitude / rate of ocean acidification• Current terrestrial sink and plausible projections into
the future
![Page 31: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
But there is clear value in doing better C4MIP: comparison of coupled climate/carbon models
Land uptake uncertainty in 2100 of 16 GtC/year. Nearly 2x the current fossil fuel emissions rate.
Friedlingstein et al., 2006
![Page 32: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Observational constraints
Terrestrial uptake of carbon ( __C yr-1)
Time
0
10
5
-5
hindcast forecast
present
Possible carbon cycle forecasts
CurrentFuture: Well maintained network
Vision
Experimental constraints
NACP interim syntheses?
(details of flux magnitude and observations left ambiguous - could be applied to many regions or observations)
![Page 33: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
What is “good enough?”: Idealized view
Investment in science to improve knowledge
Reg
iona
l flu
x un
cert
aint
y
(Where are we on this curve?)
This is when we are done.(What is this number?)
Threshold for data that are ‘good enough’ for our decision support needs.
(What decisions are we supporting?)
Decision support research sets the bar, science is conducted to reduce uncertainties, logical decisions follow.
![Page 34: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
What is “good enough?” : More realistic view
Investment in science to improve knowledge
Reg
iona
l flu
x un
cert
aint
y
(Where are we on this curve?)
This is when we are done.(What is this number?)
Threshold for data that are ‘good enough’ for our decision support needs.
(What decisions are we supporting?)
“Good enough” is the information available when the decisions must be made. We have little time to spare.
![Page 35: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Charge to you
• Correct my errors regarding the state of the science.
• Consider how you can help to– solidify our base coastal and terrestrial science and/or – be a point of connection that helps to expand our
science.• Consider how we can improve the feedback
between fundamental science and decision support needs.
• Continue building our research community.
![Page 36: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The NACP is held together by:
• The continued, dedicated efforts of the CCIWG members. Look up who they are, and thank them. This is the most active, dedicated Interagency Working Group in all of the USGCRP.
• The work of the Carbon Cycle Science program office (Gyami Shrestha), and the NACP office (Peter Griffith et al). Look up who they are, and thank them.
• The continued engagement of the Science Steering Groups, meeting program committees NACP investigators, etc. Your active participation makes this program go. Contribute. Volunteer. Take the initiative.
![Page 37: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
On-on!
![Page 38: Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649e9d5503460f94b9dc82/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
New US CCSP Goals, 2011• Goal 1 (Q1, Q2): Provide clear and timely explanation of past and current variations
observed in atmospheric CO2 and CH4 – and the uncertainties surrounding them. • Goal 2 (Q1, Q2): Understand and quantify the socioeconomic drivers of carbon
emissions, and develop transparent methods to monitor and verify those emissions. • Goal 3 (Q1, Q2, Q3): Determine and evaluate the vulnerability of carbon stocks and
flows to future climate change and human activities, emphasizing potential positive feedbacks to sources or sinks that make climate stabilization more critical or more difficult.
• Goal 4 (Q3): Predict how ecosystems, biodiversity, and natural resources will change under different CO2 and climate change scenarios.
• Goal 5 (Q1, Q2, Q3): Determine the likelihood of success and the potential for side effects of carbon management pathways that might be undertaken to achieve a low-carbon future.
• Goal 6 (Q1, Q2, Q3): Address decision maker needs for current and future carbon cycle information and provide data and projections that are relevant, credible, and legitimate for their decisions.