Diabetes Treatment Update - Family Medicine...Diabetes Treatment Update Brian Halstater, MD Goals...

166
Diabetes Treatment Update Brian Halstater, MD

Transcript of Diabetes Treatment Update - Family Medicine...Diabetes Treatment Update Brian Halstater, MD Goals...

Diabetes Treatment Update

Brian Halstater, MD

Goals and Objectives

At the conclusion of this session, the learner should be better able to:• Diagnose Type II Diabetes• Describe recommended first steps for

glycemic control in a patient newly diagnosed with Type II Diabetes

• Compare the pharmacologic classes of diabetic medications

Diabetes Update

https://www.dailysignal.com/2015/06/05/photo-essay-remembering-the-tiananmen-square-protests-26-years-later/Photo: Stringer/Reuters/Newscom

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Narrow down to type II DM , adults, non-pregnant and non-insulin regimens, but may mention some items

The Main Reference

https://professional.diabetes.org/content-page/standards-medical-care-diabetes/

Diabetes Care – 15 Sections

1 – Improving Care/ Population Health2 – Classification/ Dx3 – Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities4 – Lifestyle Management5 – Prevention or Delay of Type 2 DM

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Not going to cover each section in detail, information will be in slides for the overarching points we don’t cover today

Diabetes Care – 15 Sections

6 – Glycemic Targets7 – Obesity Mgt for Tx of Type 2 DM8 – Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment9 – Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management10 – Microvascular Complications and Foot Care

Diabetes Care – 15 Sections

11 - Older Adults12 - Children and Adolescents13 - Management of DM in Pregnancy14 - DM Care in the Hospital15 - Diabetes Advocacy

ADA Evidence Grading

A Strongest (clear evidence, compelling non-experimental or supportive evidence)B Supportive Evidence, strongerC Supportive Evidence, weaker

E Expert Consensus or Clinical Experience

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Guidelines are evidence based A – well conducted, generalizable randomized controlled trials that are adequately powered (multicenter trial; meta-analysis with quality ratings in analysis) – OR – Compelling non-experimental evidence (all or none rule by Center for EMB at U of Oxford) – OR – Supportive evidence from well conducted randomized controlled trials that are adequately powered (one or more institutions; meta-analysis same as earlier) B – Well conducted cohort or registry studies, meta-analysis of cohort studies or from well –conducted case-control study C – Poorly controlled or uncontrolled studies (randomized clinical trials with 1 or more major or 3 or more minor methodological flaws; observational studies with high potential for bias; case series or reports) – OR – Conflicting evidence with the weight of evidence supporting the recommendation

Case 1Which one of the following, when

confirmed with a repeat tests, meets the diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus

(values in mg/ dL)?– A fasting blood glucose level of 120– A 2- hour value of 180 on an oral glucose

tolerance test– A random glucose level of 180 in a patient

with symptoms of diabetes mellitus– A positive urine dipstick for glucose– A hemoglobin A1c of 7.0%

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Reframe question for our purposes – what are the diagnostic criteria for diabetes?

Section 2

Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Spend some time here – have to be sure we’re treating the right disease.

Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes

4 General Categories• Type 1• Type 2• Gestational• Other Causes

Presenter
Presentation Notes
1 – Autoimmune beta-cell destruction (usually absolute insulin deficiency) 2 – usually insulin resistance with progressive loss of beta cell insulin secretion GDM – Dx in 2nd or 3rd Trimester without DM prior to pregnancy Other – MODY (maturity-onset diabetes of the young), CF, pancreatitis, drug induced, other Unless otherwise specified, talk with focus on Type 2 DM

Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes – Type 2

Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes – Type 2

Diagnosis of Diabetes – HgA1c use

• To avoid misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis, the A1C test should be performed using a method that is certified by the NGSP and standardized to the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) assay. B

• Marked discordance between measured A1C and plasma glucose levels should raise the possibility of A1C assay interference due to hemoglobin variants (i.e., hemoglobinopathies) and consideration of using an assay without interference or plasma blood glucose criteria to diagnose diabetes. B

Diagnosis of Diabetes – HgA1c use

• In conditions associated with increased red blood cell turnover, such as sickle cell disease, pregnancy (second and third trimesters), hemodialysis, recent blood loss or transfusion, or erythropoietin therapy, only plasma blood glucose criteria should be used to diagnose diabetes. B

• Summary of HgA1c recommendation– Use a certified lab to measure HgA1c– If HgA1c discordance with glucose – consider hemoglobinothapies that

interfere with HgA1c and consider using glucose critieria and not the HgA1c

– If increased RBC turnover, use glucose criteria

Diagnosis of Diabetes – Increased Risk (Prediabetes)

• Screening for prediabetes and risk for future diabetes with an informal assessment of risk factors or validated tools should be considered in asymptomatic adults. B

• Note –the screening for DM and Pre-DM is very similar

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Note – screening for DM are virtually identical

Validated ToolPaper or Online

http://www.diabetes.org/are-you-at-risk/diabetes-risk-test/?loc=atrisk-slabnav

Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes – Testing Criteria

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Summary of the prior slides good reference point. Overweight or Obese and 1 or more RF before the age of 45 Once 45 – everyone should be tested

Prediabetes Testing

• In patients with prediabetes, identify and if appropriate, treat other cardiovascular disease risk factors. B

• To test for prediabetes, FBG, 2h plasma glucose test and HgA1c are equally appropriate. B

Testing Criteria (Peds)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Just to mention screening for children Overweight plus one or more risk factors The children screening is mentioned as this was found on the ABFM CK questions and may be on the boards.

Diagnosis of Prediabetes

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Remember DM criteria: FBS > 125 2 hr GTT > 200 HgA1c > 6.5 Normal: FBS under 100 2 hg GTT under 140 HgA1c under 5.7 There are recommendations for screening for GDM and Type I DM, hidden slides in slide deck y’all will get.

Case 1 – Restate question

- A fasting blood glucose level of 120- A 2- hour value of 180 on an oral glucose tolerance test- A random glucose level of 180 in a patient with symptoms of diabetes mellitus- A positive urine dipstick for glucose- A hemoglobin A1c of 7.0%

Case 1 - Answer

Case 1 - Critique

Case 2

Presenter
Presentation Notes
With permission from The American Board of Family Medicine Part of the ABFM CKSA

Section 8

Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment

Focus on Type 2 Diabetes

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Take a patient – centered approach with taking all variable into account (cost, side effects, hypoglycemic risk, efficacy, weight, delivery methods) Mention the 90s – limited options – sulfonureas, metformin, human or pork/ beef nph or r

Pharmacologic Therapy Recommendations – General Principles

• Metformin is preferred and should the preferred first line medication and should be continued unless contraindicated or not tolerated. A.

• Metformin (long term) may be associated with Vitamin B12 Deficiency, check periodically, especially in patients with anemia or neuropathy. B.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Metformin preferred in fact the recommendations in this section begin and end with Metformin. It is effective, safe and inexpensive.

Pharmacologic Therapy Recommendations – Newly Dx Patients

General Principles

• When HgA1c ≥10 and/ or BG ≥300 (with or without other agents) consider insulin. E

• HgA1c ≥9 consider dual therapy when. E

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Once glucose is better controlled, able to modify and simplify regimen. Each medication added lowers HgA1c by 0.7-1.0%

Pharmacologic Therapy Recommendations – CVD?

General PrinciplesNo CVD

• If on mono or dual therapy and not at goal over 3 months, add another agent. A

CVD• Start with lifestyle

management and metformin; later introduce agent(s) proven to reduce CV events and mortality (empagliflozin, liraglutide). A

• Consider use of canagliflozin. C

Presenter
Presentation Notes
If no CVD – any of six options – sulfonurea, thiazolidinedione, DPP-4 Inhibitor, SGLT-2 inhibitor, GLP-1Receptor Agonist or basal insulin. All listed on a table later for reference (Table 8.1). If CVD – Empagliflozin and Canagliflozin (SGLT-2 Inhibitors); Liraglutide (GLP-1 RA) regular, not extended release as there is some evidence that these medications can prevent CV complications in patients with DM. This is new, long know that glucose control can prevent microvascular complications, some of these newer agents can prevent maculovascular risk as well

Pharmacologic Therapy Recommendations – Not at Goal

– General Principles

• Don’t delay drug intensification if not at glycemic goals, including considering insulin therapy. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Note – be sure to re-evaluate regimen from time to time to be sure it is doable by the patient

Treatment

Flowsheet

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Funny looking slide, I know We’re not going to cover combination injectable therapy today except for the next slide Target setting is a topic in and of itself, but we’re all familiar with this…generally should be 7, but may be more or less (see section on Glycemic Targets in the slide deck)

Basal Insulin Therapy

Presenter
Presentation Notes
There are guidelines on how to do this. Like a microscope Start with Coarse Adjustment by starting with a basal insulin and adjust as need to get fasting glucose at goal THEN use the fine adjustment by modifying regimen with rapid acting insulin, addling GLP-1RA or using pre-mixed.

Meds! 12 Classes• Biguanide(s) – 1st Line• Sulfonylureas*• Meglitinides• Thiazolidinediones*• Alpha-Glucosidase inhibitors• DPP-4 inhibitors*• Bile acid sequestrants• Dopamine-2 agonists• SGLT2 inhibitors*• GLP-1 receptor agonists*• Amylin mimetic(s)• Insulin/ analog(s)*

Presenter
Presentation Notes
*Preferred 2nd agent; insulin preferred is Basal insulin Multiple options – allows for a more individualized approach, also is overwhelming; be aware of pros/ cons of each class

Drug and Patient Factors Table

Presenter
Presentation Notes
EfficacyHypoglycemiaWeight ChangeCV EffectsCostOral or SubCutaneousRenal EffectsAdditional Considerations These are addressed when we go over each class. Metformin, SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 RA, DPP-4 inhibitors, Thiazolidinediones, sulfonureas, Insulin/ analogs

Biguanides (Metformin)• Decreased hepatic glucose production• High efficacy, generally first line

therapy• Low risk of hypoglycemia• Weight neutral to weight loss• Potentially beneficial with CVD• Low cost• Oral• CI with GFR <30 (care if 30-45)

Sugar

Sugar

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Activates AMP kinase (and may have other mechanisms of action) resulting in decreased gluconeogenesis and increased glucose uptake by muscles Do not initiate if GFR 45 or under; assess if already on this

Biguanides (Metformin)From the Table

Sugar

Sugar

Metformin

• Comes in IR and ER• Depending on formulation, maximum

dose between 2,000 – 2,550 mg• GI side effects are common• B12 deficiency is a possibility

Sugar

Sugar

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Start low and go slow, want to avoid GI side effects; tend to use the BID dosing to maximum of 1000 mg BID instead of a higher dose at TID

Sulfonureas – 2nd generation

• Glyburide (regular and micronized, [not bioequivalent], qD or BID)

• Glipizide (IR and XL, qD or BID)• Glimepiride (qD)

• Glyburide and Glipizide + Metformin• Glimepiride + Thiazolidinediones

Insulin

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Not advised to use 1st generation Again start low and go slow, inexpensive add on to metformin therapy; some authors prefer Glipizide over Glyburide (lower risk of hypoglycemia) Closes K ATP channels of beta-cell plasma membranes (another class does this too) the Meglitinides

Sulfonureas – From the TableInsulin

Sulfonureas – 2nd generation

• Increases insulin secretion• High efficacy• Risk of hypoglycemia• Potential weight gain• Cardiac neutral• Low cost• Oral

Insulin

Presenter
Presentation Notes

Sulfonureas – 2nd generation

• Glyburide – avoid if CrCl <50• Start the other 2 slowly to avoid

hypoglycemia if RI

• Old studies showed increased risk of CV mortality with an older sulfonurea

Insulin

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Over time, sulfonureas tend to not continue to work over time and eventually another agent will need to be added This is thought to be due to SU not addressing the underlying complex pathology of DM, there is hope that newer agents with multiple mechanisms of action will have less of, or none of, this problem

Meglitinides (glinides)

• Repaglinide (Prandin)• Nateglinide (Starlix)

• Repaglinide also with metformin

Insulin

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Closes K ATP channels of beta-cell plasma membranes Not on the preferred list but these are a rapid acting secretagogues with the same mechanism of action as sulfonureas

Meglitinides (glinides)• Increases insulin secretion (same

mechanism as Sulfonureas)• Oral• Care with CrCl <30• Best for patients with

– Sulfa allergies– Irregular schedules– Late post-prandial hypoglycemia on

Sulfonureas

Insulin

Presenter
Presentation Notes
No added benefit when used in combo w/ sulfonylureas or other insulin secretagogues give 1-30min before meal; skip dose if meal skipped

Thiazolidinediones

• Pioglitazone (Actos)• Rosiglitazone (Avandia)

• Both with metformin or glimepiride• Pioglitazone with alogliptin (DPP-4

inhibitor)

Insulin sensitivity

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Activates the nuclear transcription factor PPAR-gamma – takes longer to work as this is a gene upexpression

Thiazolidinediones – From the Table

Insulin sensitivity

Thiazolidinediones

• Increases insulin sensitivity• High Efficacy• No risk of hypoglycemia• Potential weight gain• Pioglitazone may be beneficial in CVD• Increased risk of CHF (fluid retention)• Low cost• Oral

Insulin sensitivity

Thiazolidinediones

• Neutral for kidneys, avoid use in RI due to fluid retention risk

• BLACK BOX WARNING for both CHF• Risks

– Fluid retention– May be beneficial in NASH– Risk of bone fracture– Pioglitazone bladder cancer– Rosiglitazone increased LDL cholesterol

Insulin sensitivity

Presenter
Presentation Notes
No dose adjustment if use in renal impaired patients Careful or avoid with osteoporosis, heart failure, edema Not weight neutral, can be cumulative with sulfonurea

DPP-4 Inhibitors

• Sitagliptin (Januvia)• Saxagliptin (Onglyza)• Linagliptin (Tradjenta)• Alogliptin (Nesina)

Insulin*

Glucagon*

DPP-4 Dipeptidyl peptidase-4

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Inhibits DPP-4 increased postprandial incretin (GLP-1 and GIP) concentrations Glucose Dependent Starting to become generic

DPP-4 Inhibitors

• Sitagliptin Ertugliflozin (SGLT-2i); simvastatin

• Saxagliptin Dapagliflozin (SGLT-2i)• Linagliptin Empagliflozin (SGLT-2i)• Alogliptin Pioglitazone (TDZ)

• All 4 with metformin

Insulin*

Glucagon*

DPP-4 Inhibitors – From the Table

Insulin*

Glucagon*

DPP-4 Inhibitors

• Increase insulin secretion and decreases glucagon secretion

• Intermediate efficacy• No risk of hypoglycemia• Neutral for weight gain• CVD neutral; CHF potential with

Saxagliptin and Alogliptin

Insulin*

Glucagon*

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Good for smaller reductions in HgA1c, weight neutral and low risk of hypoglycemia There is a warning for CHF based on SAVOR-TIMI trial for Saxagliptin over placebo for admissions for heart failure; the EXAMINE trial for Alopliptin over placebo.

DPP-4 Inhibitors

• High cost• Oral, once daily• May need renal dose adjustment• Can use in RF• Potential risk of pancreatitis/ joint

pain

Insulin*

Glucagon*

Presenter
Presentation Notes
If pancreatitis – discontinue medication

SGLT-2 Inhibitors

• Canagliflozin (Invokana)• Dapagliflozin (Farxiga)• Empagliflozin (Jardiance)• Ertugliflozin* (Steglatro)

Glucose

SGLT-2 Sodium GLucose co-Transporter 2

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Ertuglifolzin – newest in the class Best when cost is not an issue and HgAc1 is above goal Inhibits SGLT2 in the proximal nephron Glucosuria

SGLT-2 Inhibitor Combos

• Canagliflozin Metformin• Dapagliflozin Metformin;

Saxagliptin (DPP-4i)• Empagliflozin Metformin;

Linagliptin (DPP-4i)

Glucose

SGLT-2 Inhibitor – From the TableGlucose

SGLT-2 Inhibitors

• Blocks glucose reabsorption by the kidney increases glucosuria

• Intermediate effectiveness• No risk of hypoglycemia• Promotes weight loss• Canagliflozin and Empagliflozin may

benefit CVD and CHF• High cost

Glucose

SGLT-2 Inhibitors

• Oral• Canagliflozin and Empagliflozin

may help avert diabetic renal disease

• Care with decreased GFR• Reference table as each has

different recommendations for renal insufficiency

Glucose

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Dapagliflozin- <60 not rec; CI <30 Canagliflozin- <60 decreased dose; CI <45 Empagliflozin- <45 CI Ertugliflozin- 30-60 avoid use; <30 CI

SGLT-2 Inhibitors

• Canagliflozin - Black box warning Risk of amputation

• Canagliflozin – risk of bone fractures• DKA risk (all) – rare• GU infections (all)• Risk of hypovolemia; hypotension• Elevated LDL

Glucose

Presenter
Presentation Notes
While the SGLT-2 and GLP-1 RA (next class) are both effective, promote weight loss and low risk of hypoglycemia, this is oral and qD, make preferred. Careful if on loop diuretics, consider stopping or reducing dose of all diuretics; after 2-3 months intravascular volume is back and can be resumed/ redosed �Genital yeast infections – treatable; UTI risk increased (both in women more than men)

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists• Exenatide (Byetta)• Lixisenatide (Adlyxin)• Liraglutide (Victoza, Saxenda)• Exenatide (extended release -

weekly) (Bydureon)• Albiglutide (Tanzeum)• Dulaglutide (Trulicity)• Semaglutide (Ozempic)

Insulin*

Glucagon*

SatietyGastric Emptying

https://www.azpicentral.com/byetta/pi_byetta.pdf#page=1

GLP-1 Glucagon Like Peptide 1 (Incretin Mimetic)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Activates GLP-1 receptors First class – not oral SQ twice or weekly depending on medication/ formulation Glucose dependent

GLP-1 RAs – From the Table

Insulin*

Glucagon*

SatietyGastric Emptying

Presenter
Presentation Notes

GLP-1 RAs and Combos• With Basal Insulins:

– Liraglutide Degludec– Lixisenatide Glargine

• Mechanism of Action – 4– Increased insulin secretion (glucose

dependent)– Decreased glucagon secretion (glucose

dependent)– Slows gastric emptying– Increased satiety

Insulin*

Glucagon*

SatietyGastric Emptying

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Degludec is a long acting insulin with ½ life of 25 hours

GLP-1 RAs• High efficacy• No risk of hypoglycemia• Promotes weight loss• Liraglutide (regular not XR) may

benefit CVD• No CHF effect

Insulin*

Glucagon*

SatietyGastric Emptying

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Best when cost is not an issue and HgAc1 is above goal,

GLP-1 RAs• High cost• Subcutaneous• Liraglutide may help with renal

disease• Increased risk of Side Effects with RI

(check prescribing information)• GFR<30

– CI for Exenatide (both)– Caution with Lixisenatide

Insulin*

Glucagon*

SatietyGastric Emptying

Presenter
Presentation Notes

GLP-1 RAs Side Effects

• Black Box Warning Risk of thyroid C-cell tumors for 5 in class (see prescribing information)– End in ‘-TIDE’ think about ‘TIroiDE’

• GI side effects common• Injection site reactions• ? Pancreatitis risk

Insulin*

Glucagon*

SatietyGastric Emptying

http://togotv.dbcls.jp/ja/togopic.2014.4.html

Presenter
Presentation Notes
N, V, D (up to 30% may have nausea) CI in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma hx of FHx, or in MEN2. Council on risk of thyroid cancer and discuss tx – neck mass, dysphagia, dyspnea, persistent hoarseness (thyroid mass sx) Liraglutide, Albiglutide, dulaglutide, Exenatide (XR), Sematide have BLACK BOX WARNING Dose increases should only occur when needed and if side effects are absent If pancreatitis develops – stop the medication – no established link however Can combine the GLP-1RA and the SLGT-2i, seem to be synergistic

Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitors

• Acarbose (Preconse)• Miglitol (Glyset)

Carbohydrate digestion/ absorption

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Inhibits alpha glucosidase in intestines

Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitors

• Slows intestinal carbohydrate digestion and absorption

• Oral• Avoid use if Cr <30 (Acarbose) or

<25 (Miglitol)

Carbohydrate digestion/ absorption

https://www.kisspng.com/png-computer-icons-encapsulated-postscript-avatar-abdo-3469374/

Presenter
Presentation Notes
GI side effects common – Bloating, Nausea, Diarrhea, Flatulence

Bile Acid Sequestrants

• Colesevelam (Welchol)

Incretin levels?Hepatic glucose production?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Binds bile acids in GI tract, increases hepatic bile acid secretion

Bile Acid Sequestrants

• Unsure mechanism of action – think decreased hepatic glucose production and increased incretin levels

• Used for both DM and high cholesterol (same doses)

• Oral• No adjustment for renal or liver

issues

Incretin levels?Hepatic glucose production?

https://www.kisspng.com/png-computer-icons-encapsulated-postscript-avatar-abdo-3469374/

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Main side effects are GI (not absorbed) constipation, diarrhea, bloating, flatulence; bad taste in mouth

Dopamine-2 Agonists

• Bromocriptine quick release (0.8 mg)• Oral, first thing in the morning• Modulates hypothalamic regulation of

metabolism; may increase insulin sensitivity

• Lower doses (up to 4.8 mg daily)• Main side effect – Nausea• CI – Type I DM, syncope, psychosis

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3152192/

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Approved in 2009 for tx of DM II Thought to work on the circadian neuronal hypothalamic activities – to reset an abnormal elevated hypothalamic drive for increased glucose, FFA and Trig in insulin resistant patients. To address a Neurotransmitter dysfunction Can lower HgA1c by 0.4-0.8%; low risk of hypoglycemia

Dopamine-2 Agonists

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3152192/

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Side Effects – orthostatic hypotension in patients with syncopal migraines, inhibition of lactation in nursing women.

Amylin Mimetics• Pramlintide (Symlin)

• Decreased glucagon secretion• Slows gastric emptying• Increased satiety• No renal dosing changes• Risk of hypoglycemia• Subcutaneous• Expensive

Glucagon

SatietyGastric Emptying

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Similar to the GLP-1 receptor agonists minus the increased insulin sensitivity Side effects – injection source issues, decreased appetite, stomach pain, fatigue, dizziness, cough, sore throat, joint pain.

Specific Recommendation from Section 8

A patient-centered approach should be used to guide the choice of

pharmacologic agents. Considerations include efficacy, hypoglycemia risk,

history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, impact on

weight, potential side effects, renal effects, delivery method (oral versus

subcutaneous), cost, and patient preferences. E

Insulin

• Rapid acting analogs• Short-acting analogs• Intermediate acting analgos• Concentrated Regular • Basal analogs• Premixed• Premixed insulin/ GLP-1 RA (2)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Just to review.

Case 2

Presenter
Presentation Notes
With permission from The American Board of Family Medicine Part of the ABFM CKSA

Case 2 - Answer

Case 2 - Critique

References/ Additional Information

• American Diabetes Assocation: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes –2018. The Journal of Clinical and Applies Research and Education. 41 (Suppl. 1). January 2018. www.diabetes.org/diabetescare

• Summary of Revisions: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2018Diabetes Care 2018; 41(Suppl. 1):54-56

There’s an App for That!

Search for ADA Standards of Care app in app store or Google play

References/ Additional Information

• Cavaiola TS, Pettus JH. Management Of Type 2 Diabetes: Selecting Amongst Available Pharmacological Agents. [Updated 2017 Mar 31]. In: De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, et al., editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-.

• Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425702/

References/ Additional Information

• http://resources.aace.com/• http://outpatient.aace.com/slide-

library• www.diabetes.org/socrisktest• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/a

rticles/PMC3152192/

Educational Podcast

Section 3

Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities

Patient-Centered Collaborative Care

• A patient-centered communication style that uses person-centered and strength-based language, active listening, elicits patient preferences and beliefs, and assesses literacy, numeracy, and potential barriers to care should be used to optimize patient health outcomes and health-related quality of life. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
PATIENT-CENTERED COLLABORATIVE CARE Overarching theme

Overarching Themes

• Patient centered• Active listening• Patient preferences / beliefs• Barrier identification

– Literacy– Numeracy– Others

• Optimizing outcomes/ QOL

Presenter
Presentation Notes
PATIENT-CENTERED COLLABORATIVE CARE Overarching theme Interdisciplinary, including self-care Take into account age, complications, QOL, literacy, etc…..patient’s need to have an active role

Comprehensive Medical Evaluation1/3

• Confirm the diagnosis and classify diabetes (section 2). B

• Evaluate for diabetes complications and potential comorbid conditions. E

• Review previous treatment and risk factor control in patients with established diabetes. E

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Prologue for this A complete medical evaluation should be performed at the initial visit to:

Comprehensive Medical Evaluation2/3

• Begin patient engagement in the formulation of a care management plan. B

• Develop a plan for continuing care. B

Comprehensive Medical Evaluation – Follow up 3/3

• Interval medical history• Medication • Physical examination• Labs (A1C and metabolic targets)• Assessment:

– Complications risk– Self-management– Behaviors, nutrition, psychosocial health– Referral need– Immunizations and other routine health

maintenance screening. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Follow up visit should include Medication – compliance/ side effects

History ReviewColumns:1 – Initial2 – Follow up3 – Annual visit

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Note – may need to do these items in ‘chunks’ if time/ resource limitations; OK to use team to address them Follow up depending on need; initially at least every 3-6 months, then annually. Illustrates that glycemia is not the only goal of care – all other routine health issues addressed too; be sure to consider referrals to self-management, support and nutritional resources.

PMHx and FHx ReviewColumns:1 – Initial2 – Follow up3 – Annual visit

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Specialists – Optho, Nutrition, self-management, mental health, social work, dental and nutritional resources and others as needed.

Social History ReviewColumns:1 – Initial2 – Follow up3 – Annual visit

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Historical data that should be considered Sleep pattern and duration Meta-analysis found poor sleep quality, short and long sleep were associated with higher HgA1c in patients with DM. the only goal of care – all other routine health issues addressed too

Medication ReviewColumns:1 – Initial2 – Follow up3 – Annual visit

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Essential to see how/ if taking as only can really help if you know what the patient is doing.

Immunizations• Provide routinely recommended vaccinations for

children and adults with diabetes by age. C– Annual influenza vaccine is recommended for all people

≥6 months of age. C• Pneumococcal disease

– PCV13 (13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) children before age 2 years. C

– PPSV23 (23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine) for ages 2 through 64 years with diabetes AND ≥65 years. C

• Hepatitis B – Unvaccinated adults with diabetes ages 19 through 59

years. C– Consider same for unvaccinated adults with diabetes

ages≥60 years. C

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Patients with DM higher risk for Hep B infection and are at increased risk for flu and Pnx disease. Advised for all 3. Flu – all folks including those with DM Pneumococcal vaccines – separate talk – 2 vaccines PCV 13 (conjugate) and PPSV23 (polysaccharide) PPPSV23 – age 65 and older regardless of vaccination history Hep B may be because of increased risk of exposure to blood or improper equipment use. If over 60 at provider discrestion.

? Technology ReviewColumns:1 – Initial2 – Follow up3 – Annual visit

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Remember my talk from last year on e-Health? �Technology, while not well studied, seems to be able to help here.

Screening Columns:1 – Initial2 – Follow up3 – Annual visit

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Note – Type I – consider screening for autoimmune thyroid and celiac disease soon after dx. Note – DM is associated with increased risk of Cancer – liver, pancreas, endometrium, colon/ rectum, breast and bladder. Unsure exact reason. Please follow routine cancer screening recommendations.

Other Co-Morbidities• In people with a history of cognitive

impairment/dementia, intensive glucose control cannot be expected to remediate deficits. Treatment should be tailored to avoid significant hypoglycemia. B

• Annually screen people who are prescribed atypical antipsychotic medications for prediabetes or diabetes. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
DM is associated with increased risk and rate of cognitive decline and increased risk of dementia. Intesive DM treatment does not improve cognitive function; can help prevent decline. Severe hypoglycemia can be associated with cognitive decline as well.

Other Recommendations• Check morning testosterone in men with DM

with signs/ sx of hypogonadism - B• Patients with HIV screened for DM before

treatment, when adjusting and regularly if negative (for DM) - E

• 2nd Generation antipsychotic usage in person with DM, weight, glucose control and lipids should be watched and reassess treatment regimen – C

• DM self-care activities with people with DM and serious mental illness

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Consider islet autotransplation for patients requiring total pancreatectomy to prevent postsurgical DM – C

Other Co-Morbidities• Fatty liver disease – can be improved

with DM and lipid tx• Fractures – increased hip fx risk

– Thiazolidinediones; SGLT-2 Inhibitors• Hearing impairment

– 2x as common in patients with Diabetes than those without.

• Obstructive Sleep Apnea– If present, treatment may improve BP, QOL

and some glycemic control

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Hip Fx – interestingly in type I OP, type 2 not OP – routine fracture prevention strategies. If type 2 and has fracture risks – use thiazolidinediones and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors with caution

Anxiety/ Depression

• Anxiety – screen those with anxious sxthat interfere with their life or tx. B

• Fear of hypoglycemia can be treated with blood glucose awareness training. A

• Depression – Consider annual screening, at diagnosis or significant changes. B

• Depression – Refer to experienced practitioners. A

Presenter
Presentation Notes
They recommend referral for anxiety Positive screens necessitate further evaluation/ treatment Referral with providers using CBT, interpersonal tx or other Evidence based Tx in conjunction with collaborative care

Disordered Eating• Providers should consider reevaluating the

treatment regimen of people with diabetes who present with symptoms of disordered eating behavior, an eating disorder, or disrupted patterns of eating. B

• Consider screening for disordered or disrupted eating using validated screening measures when hyperglycemia and weight loss are unexplained based on self-reported behaviors related to medication dosing, meal plan, and physical activity. In addition, a review of the medical regimen is recommended to identify potential treatment related effects on hunger/caloric intake. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Unique population

Physical/ Labs/ A&P

Columns:1 – Initial2 – Follow up3 – Annual visit

Physical Columns:1 – Initial2 – Follow up3 – Annual visit

Labs Columns:1 – Initial2 – Follow up3 – Annual visit

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Also – labs after medication/ lifestyle changes as indicated.

Assessment and Plan Columns:1 – Initial2 – Follow up3 – Annual visit

Presence of Coronary Artery Disease Risk Factors

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is also from section 9 Cardiovascular disease and risk management

Staging of Chronic Renal Disease

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is from section 10 Microvascular Complications and Foot Care

Section 6

Glycemic Targets

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This section is not as long as you’d think

Glycemic Targets

• Intensive insulin regimens should use SMBG (self-monitoring of blood glucose) before meals, snacks and bed and prn. B

• SMBG may help others with DM. E• Type 1 patients may benefit from

CGM (continuous). A

Presenter
Presentation Notes
General rule on intensive insulin – use SMBG at least 4x daily; prn includes suspected low or high blood sugars, before exercise, after treating hypoglycemia until normal Others not on insulin or fewer injections; Be sure patients know how to do SMBG, record results and act on the values (ie – what are they doing to do with the data?) CGM – good for hypoglycemia unawareness and/ or frequent hypoglycemia. Be sure proper assessment done and they need education, training and support. Not a lot of data to support that SMBG improves outcomes in patients without insulin therapy. ??? Anyone routinely recommend SMBG to their patients? How useful? Can allude to the eHealth talk that we may be able to do DM management using technology in the future. Note – new FLASH CGM – can measure glucose on demand, but does not have alarms or alerts

HgA1c Goals

• Non-pregnant adults 7% or less. A• More or less stringent on individual

basis. C/ B.

• More stringent?• Less Stringent?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
?? What consider for more stringent (ie – 6.5) low risk of low glucose, metformin or lifestyle only, long life expectancy, low CV risk ?? Less stringent? (ie – <8) h/o severe hypoglycemia, limited life expectancy, advanced micro or macro vascular complications, lots of co-morbidities, longstanding DM

Factors to Assist HgA1c Goal

HgA1c Frequency – How often check?

• If well controlled?• Not at goal? • Glycemic therapy changed?

HgA1c Frequency

• Check 2x yearly if well controlled. E• Check 4x yearly with changed

therapy or not at goals. E• POC testing can be useful. E

• To convert HgA1c to average blood glucose http://professional.diabetes.org/eAG

HgA1c and Microvascular Complications

• Reduced with HgA1c targets <7%• Suggestion that lower HgA1c further

reduces these complications (but at smaller absolute change)

• Have to weigh risks of hypoglycemia vs benefit of reduced microvascular complication

http://frpic.com/vectors/eyes-clipart/eyes-clipart.png

https://www.pixcove.com/neuron-axon-nerve-cell-dendrite-neurotransmission-cell-biology-neurocyte-lockup-nerves/

https://www.kisspng.com/png-kidney-human-body-organ-clip-art-kidney-896373/

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Microvascular retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic renal disease Reduced risk with lower A1c to 7, still beneficial lower than 7 but less so ACCORD, ADVANCE and VADT showed that lower HgA1c levels were reduces onset/ progression of microvascular. So lower HgA1c goals may be appropriate with some patients.

HgA1c and Cardiovascular Complications

• Type I diabetics with intensive glycemic control early in disease course with long term benefit

• Type II diabetics also with intensive glycemic control early had long term CV benefits.– Didn’t hold for patients with long

standing disease– ACCORD halted early

https://pixabay.com/en/cardiac-pulse-systole-heartbeat-156059/

Presenter
Presentation Notes
ACCORD, ADVANCE and VADT trials (older patient, longer duration of disease, with HgA1c goal of <6, <6.5 and a 1.5% reduction in VADT Some studies saw increased benefit with early intensive control (which has led to guidelines having recommendations for early intensive medication intervention) ACCORD stopped as increased mortality in the intensive treatment group; not sure why.

HgA1c and Cardiovascular Complications

• ADVANCE – ESRD was lower in intense group; no benefit or harm for CV events.

• VADT reduced risk in CV events with no benefit in CV or general mortality.

• Hypoglycemia is main risk of intensive therapy

• Risks/ benefits to be discussed for goal setting.

https://pixabay.com/en/cardiac-pulse-systole-heartbeat-156059/

Severe Hypoglycemia risk

• All 3 studies (ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT) found severe hypoglycemia:– Longer duration of diabetes– Known h/o hypoglycemia– Advanced atherosclerosis– Advanced age and/ or fraility

General HgA1c Goal

• Non-pregnant adults 7% or less. A• More or less stringent on individual

basis. C/ B.

• Individualize

Other Glycemic Goals

Presenter
Presentation Notes
What consider for more stringent (ie – 6.5) low risk of low glucose, metformin or lifestyle only, long life expectancy, low CV risk Less stringent? (ie – <8) h/o severe hypoglycemia, limited life expectancy, advanced micro or macro vascular complications, lots of co-morbidities, longstanding DM

Degrees of Hypoglycemia

• Ask!

• Oral glucose preferred ≤70 and conscious. E

• Glucagon for severe (Med alert). E• Revaluate regimen if severe/ recurrent. E

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Oral glucose – check SMBG after 15 minutes, repeat as needed; once at normal have a meal or snack to prevent reoccurance. Glucagon – caregivers, colleagues, friends should know how to use If on insulin and severe or unaware raise target for a few weeks. If low or declining cognition look for hypoglycemia by clinician, patient, caregivers

Section 9

Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management

CVD – Screening and Diagnosis

• Measure BP at each clinical visit, with BP ≥140/90 repeated. B

• All patients with DM and HTN should monitor BP at home. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Repeat using multiple BP readings, including the same day Follow guidelines – seated, feet on floor, arm at heart level, 5 min of rest, proper cuff Can also use 24 hour BP monitoring for dx

CV – Treatment Goals

• What is the goal for most patients with DM? Show of hands:

• A – Under 150/90• B – Under 140/90• C – Under 140/80• D – Under 130/80• E - Other

CV – Treatment Goals

• What is the goal for most patients with DM? Show of hands:

• A – Under 150/90• B – Under 140/90. A• C – Under 140/80• D – Under 130/80 • E - Other

CV – Treatment Goals• What is the goal for most patients with

DM? Show of hands:• A – Under 150/90• B – Under 140/90. A• C – Under 140/80• D – Under 130/80 • E – Other – Lower BP goal may be

appropriate if high risk for CVD and low risk of treatment. C

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Women that are HTN and become pregnant and have DM – goal BP range of 120-160/80-105 may be optimal for maternal health and minimizing impacted fetal growth. E

CV Studies

Presenter
Presentation Notes
- ACCORD BP – adults with DM and CVD or multiple CVD RF – intensive vs standard (<120 systolic vs 130-140 systolic). Results No change in primary end point of CV death, nonfatal MI or CVA. Stroke reduced 41% in intensive group, but not sustained beyond active trial. SE more common in intensive group (especially increased Cr and electrolyte disturbances) - ADVANCE BP – Adults with DM with CVD or multiple CVD RF – Combo pills (perindopril [ACE-I] and indapamide [Thiazide] vs placebo). Results Reduced primary endo point of major macro and microvascular events (9%), Death from CVD (18%) and Death from any cause (14%), over 6 year observational follow up, reduced death persisted but less so than prior HOT – Diastolic trial mostly of non-Dm but ~ <10% with DM – goal DBP <80 vs <90. Overall – no chang ein CV deaths; in DM group – lower DBP target with sig reduction (51%) in CV deaths SPRINT – Non-Dm trial, looking at SBP < 120 vs < 140. Intensive SBP goal reduced primary composite endpoint by 25% (MI, ACS, CHF and CV death); overall death reduced 27% with increased electrolye disturbances and Acute Renal Insufficiency

Lifestyle Recommendations

• BP over 120/80, weight loss (if appropriate, DASH diet, moderation of alcohol, increased physical activity. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Lower sodium Increased potassium

** TZD preferred (chlorthalidone or indapamide) *** DHP preferred (-pines, not diltiazem or verapamil)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Once diagnosed, recommend treatment go goals – A If over 160/100 – start 2 drugs - A Pick medications that will reduce CV events in DM. - A Avoid ACE-I with ARB AND ACE-I or ARB with direct renin inhibitors. – A ACE-I or ARB at maximal toerated dose is best for first line therapy for albuminuria (note – may be add on, no additional benefit for no albumin) – A, B ACE-I, ARB, diuretic – check GFR, Cr, K at least annually – B Ca Ch Blockers - amlodipine, felodipine, lacidipine, lercanidipine, nicardipine, nifedipine and nimodipine.
Presenter
Presentation Notes
If resistant HTN (3 meds including a diuretic), consider referral and/ or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist Spironolactone and eplerenone Careful with Potassium

Lipids

• Lifestyle modification including reduced saturated and trans fat and cholesterol and increased fiber, plant, exercise and n-3 FA. A

• High trigs (≥150)and/ or low HDL (<40 in men, <50 in women) intensify lifestyle therapy and glycemic control. C

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Check at diagnosis, and if not on statin or other therapy, every 5 years or as indicated. If on statin or other therapy – check every 4-12 weeks and annually later.

Lipids – Statin Therapy

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Summary of recommendations If CVD – high intensity statin tx If under 40 and other CVD risk factors – consider moderate intensity statin If over 40 w/o CVD – consider moderate intensity stating A for 40-75, B for over 75 If cannot get to goal dose, use highest tolerated dose If cannot get to LDL under 70 with CVD consider ezetimibe (preferred due to cost) or PCSK9 inhibitor High trigs – (over 500) – look for secondary causes and consider fish oil or fibric acid derivatives to reduce pancreatitis risk Note – not recommended to use statin/ fibrate (no change over statin alone) or statin/ niacin (may increase risk of CVA and has more side effects)

Aspirin• Good for secondary prevention (75-162

mg/ day). A• If CVD and ASA Allergy clopidogrel

(75 mg/ day). B• Dual anti-platet tx (ASA with P2Y12i)

for 1 year after ACS (may benefit longer too). A/ B.

• Primary prevention for increased CVD risk (age 50 or older with 1 major CVD RF with no increased bleed risk). C

Presenter
Presentation Notes
ASA not recommended for low risk folks

DM and CVD screening

• Not recommended if ASx. A• Consider looking of atypical cardiac

sx, signs/ symptoms of PVD or EKG abnormalities. E

DM and known CVD• If known CVD ACEi or ARB to reduce

risk of CV events. B• Prior MI ß-blockers for at least 2

years after event. B• If CHF and GFR over 30, OK to use

Metformin. B• If Type 2 and CVD, use lifestyle,

Metfomin and drug that reduces CV mortality (empagliflozin, liraglutide) if able. A Consider Canagliflozin. C

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Metformin as long as stable and not hospitalized with CHF For Type 2 and CVD – taking drug-specific and patient factors into account. Last point discussed with DM treatments. Empagliflozin, Canagliflozin SGLT-2 inhibitors (oral) Liraglutide GLP-1 Receptor Agonist (SQ)

Useful App – Demo

http://tools.acc.org/ASCVD-Risk-Estimator-Plus/#!/calculate/estimate/

Section 10

Microvascular Complications and Foot Care

Microvascular Complications –Kindey Screening

• Screen annually for renal disease with eGFR and urine for microalbumin in all patients with Type 2 DM, Type 1 > 5 years (or sooner if co-morbid HTN). B

Microvascular Complications –Renal Treatment

• Glucose control to reduce risk or progression of DKD. A

• BP control for same. A• If not on dialysis but have DKD, protein

intake should be 0.8 mg/ kg. B• ACEi or ARB for reduced GFR or protein

in urine. A, B.• Check K, Cr if on ACEi, ARB or

diuretics. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
If on dialysis – higher protein is allowed

Microvascular Complications –Renal Treatment

• Monitor urine protein if on ACEi or ARB to monitor response/ progression. E

• If normal BP, no protein in urine and normal BP, ACEi or ARB is not recommended for primary prevention. B

• If GFR <60, evaluate and managed CKD potential complications. E

• If GFR <30, refer for renal replacement.A

Presenter
Presentation Notes
If on dialysis – higher protein is allowed Refer when needed – if unsure of cause, or difficulty managing issues or rapidly progressing renal disease. B

Recommendations in Table Form

Complications of CKD

Presenter
Presentation Notes
What you should look for if / when GFR <60

Microvascular - Eyes

Same as for kidneys:• Glucose control to reduce risk or

progression of diabetic retinopathy. A• BP control for same. A

Diabetic Retinopathy• Screen at diagnosis of Type 2 and 5

years after diagnosis for Type 1. B• Future screening

– Well controlled DM and no retinopathy 1-2 years

– Any retinopathy at least annually– If progressive or sight-threatening more

frequent• There is a role for retinal photography,

not a substitute for comprehensive exam. E

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Women Planning pregnancy – preconception counseling that may progress or develop during pregnancy If pregnant and has DM – check eyes before pregnancy or during 1st trimester and then each trimester and for 1 year postpartum

DR Treatment

• Refer if macular edema, non- or proliferative retinopathy to experienced ophthalmologist. A

• DR is not a CI for aspirin therapy for cardioprotection as ASA does notincrease the risk of retinal hemorrhage. A

Presenter
Presentation Notes
There are other recommendation that are more ophto specific

Neuropathy• Screen at dx for Type 2 and 5 years

after dx for Type 1 for peripheral neuropathy. B

• Assessment of distal symmetric polyneuropathy history and either temperature or pinprick and vibration with 128 Hz tuning fork. 10gm monofilament done annually. B

• If other microvascular issues – look for autonomonic neuropathy. E

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Monofilament is to look for feet at risk for ulcers/ amputation

Neuropathy Treatment

• Glycemic and BP control to prevent /delay neuropathy. A, B

• Assess and treat patients to reduce pain of neuropathy and sx of autonomic neuropathy. B, E.

• Neuropathic pain pregabalin or duloxetine are recommended 1st line therapy. A

Foot Care• Comprehensive exam annually. B

– Skin, presence of deformities, neurologic and vascular assessment. B

• Check feet at each visit. C• Obtain foot history. B• If sx of claudication or reduced pedal

pulses ABI or other assessment. C• High risk feet and ulcers Multi-

disciplinary approach. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Neuro 10g monofilament with at least one other assessment (pinprick, temperature, vibration) Foot history h/o ulcer, Charcot foot, angioplasty or vascular surgery, smoking, retinopathy, renal or vascular disease. Ask about current neuropathy sx – pain, burning, numbness and vascular issues – claudication.

Foot Care• Refer to foot specialists smokers,

h/o LE complications, loss of sensation, structural abnormalities, PAD. Life-long surveillance. C

• Educate about foot self-care. B• Specialized therapeutic footwear for

high risk patients. B.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Neuro 10g monofilament with at least one other assessment (pinprick, temperature, vibration) Foot history h/o ulcer, Charcot foot, angioplasty or vascular surgery, smoking, retinopathy, renal or vascular disease. Ask about current neuropathy sx – pain, burning, numbness and vascular issues – claudication.

Section 1

Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Cover this briefly – to consider as we all figure out how to help on a population level Many of us are already addressing some/ all of these recommendations.

Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations

• Ensure treatment decisions are timely, rely on evidence-based guidelines, and are made collaboratively with patients based on individual preferences, prognoses, and comorbidities. B

• Align approaches to diabetes management with the Chronic Care Model, emphasizing productive interactions between a prepared proactive care team and an informed activated patient. A

Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations

• Care systems should facilitate team-based care, patient registries, decision support tools, and community involvement to meet patient needs. B

• Efforts to assess the quality of diabetes care and create quality improvement strategies should incorporate reliable data metrics, to promote improved processes of care and health outcomes, with simultaneous emphasis on costs. E

Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations

• Providers should assess social context, including potential food insecurity, housing stability, and financial barriers, and apply that information to treatment decisions. A

• Refer patients to local community resources when available. B

• Provide patients with self-management support from lay health coaches, navigators, or community health workers when available. A

Section 4

Lifestyle Management

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Spend a little time on this, most of this should be a review

Self-Management

• All people with DM should participate in DM self-management education. B

• 4 times to evaluate for self-management education and support:– At Dx– Annually– Complicating factors arise– Transition in care. E

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Self-management knowledge, skills, ability needed for DM self-care and self-management Patient Centered, with individual or group settings, may use technology Note – recommend 3rd party adequate reimbursement as self-care can improve outcomes

Exercise

• Children – 60 min/ d aerobic– 3x weekly muscle/ bone strengthening

• Most adults – 150 min/ week• Adults – 2-3 sessions/ week of

resistance exercise• Adults – reduce sedentary time• Older Adults – 2-3 times/ week of

balance and flexibility training

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Children – daily Most adults – at least 150 min/ week over at least 3 days with no more than 2 days rest between exercise; younger and more fit may do shorter durations of more intense exercise Prolonged sitting – get up and move every 30 minutes All B and C recommendations

Tobacco

• No tobacco or e-cigarettes. A/ C• Smoking cessation should be part of

routine DM care. B

Mental Health

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Mention mental health again as it is important. Mental health is important – be on the lookout for anxiety, depression, disordered eating, quality of life issues Note – look for ‘diabetes distress’ – when treatment goals are not met and/ or at onset of diabetic complications In older folks be aware of cognitive decline

Section 5

Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is about pre-diabetes, spend a little time here.

Prediabetes Recommendations

• Screen annually for DM if a patient has prediabetes. E

• Refer for intensive behavioral lifestyle intervention program. A– 7 ?– 150 ?

• Consider technology-assisted tools. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Screening for folks with prediabetes Program – Modeled on Diabetes Prevention Program; 7 % of initial body weight; 150 minutes of moderated intensity physical activity (walking or greater) a week Technology examples social networks, distance learning, mobile apps

Prediabetes Medication

• Metformin consideration– BMI ≥ 35– Age < 60– Women with h/o GDM– Vitamin B12

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Especially for those noted above Metformin may cause B12 deficiency, consider checking especially if anemia or peripheral neuropathy

Other Prediabetes Issues

• Look for modifiable CV risk factors. B• Self-Management may be helpful. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
CV targets for BP and lipids are the same for the general population.

Section 7

Obesity Management for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Brief time here

Obesity Management for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

• At each encounter, BMI recorded. B

• Be sure to do a readiness assessment, if ready, goal is >5% weight loss. A

Diet, Physical Activity and Behavioral Therapy

• High intensity, 500-750 kcal/ d deficit. A• Individualized diet. A• If successful, long-term (1+ year)

program prescribed. A• More aggressive short term weight loss

program can be done in selected patients by trained clinicians. B

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Long term program – monthly, continued reduced-calorie diet and high levels of physical activity (200-300 min/ week) ~3.5 to 5 hours/ week Short – term (3 month) program – very low calories <800 cal a day and total meal replacements with close monitoring. Must include long-term comprehensive weight maintenance counseling

Pharmacotherapy

• Consider medication effect on weight, and minimize where possible. E

• Risk benefit for weight loss medicines as adjunct for patients with type 2 DM and BMI ≥27. A

• Monitor, and if <5% weight loss after 3 months or side effects, stop medication and look at alternatives. A

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Specific medications will be mentioned later. DM meds – weight loss – metformin, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, GLP1 agonists and amylin mimetics. Weight neutral – Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors Weight gain – insulin secretagogues, thiazolidinediones and insulin. Other meds – weight gain – atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants, glucocorticoids, OCPS with progestins, anticonvulsants, and some antihistamines and anticholinergics. Weight loss meds – Phentermine (few weeks) 5 meds for long term weight loss.

Medications Approved for Weight Loss

Medications Approved for Weight Loss

Metabolic Surgery

Should be recommended:• BMI ≥40 (37.5*)• BMI 35-39.9 (32.5-37.4*)

– Inadequate control

Should be considered:• BMI 30-34.9 (27.5-32.4*)

– Inadequate control

Presenter
Presentation Notes
BMI over 40 regardless of regimen complexity or level of glycemic control * = Asian Americans Inadequate control despite lifestyle and optimal medical therapy If done – high volume centers with multidisciplinary teams; will need long-term support and nutritional support according to guidelines and other medical supports