DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison
description
Transcript of DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison
![Page 1: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports
in GAM 13
Bill Hutchison, Ph.D., P.E., P.G.
TAGD Quarterly Meeting
February 25, 2014
![Page 2: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Topics
• GMA 13 background– Geography– Groundwater Availability Model– Initial DFC
• Activities to date
• Overview of draft explanatory report
![Page 3: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
GMA 13
![Page 4: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
GMA 13:All or part of17 counties
![Page 5: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
GMA 13:All or part of8 GCDs
![Page 6: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
GMA 13:All or part of8 GCDs + EAA
![Page 7: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Groundwater Availability Model:QCSP-South
• Aquifers– Sparta (Layer 1)– Queen City (Layer 3)– Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer (Layers 5 to 8)
• Confining Layers– Weches (Layer 2)– Reklaw (Layer 4)
![Page 8: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
76
543 2
1
From pg 2-33 of GAM Report (Kelley and others, 2004)
![Page 9: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Carrizo-Wilcox, Queen City and Sparta Aquifers
• GMA 13 Adopted DFC on April 9, 2010
• DFC establishment relied on results from several model simulations– DFC expressed as GMA-wide average (23 ft)– Scenario 4 of GAM Run 09-034
• 61 year simulation
• Assumed a starting point in 2000
![Page 11: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Summary of Activities: Fall 2012 to Date
• Comparison of actual data with current DFC (Task 0)
• Extended GAM with updated pumping estimates from 2000 to 2011
• Updated future pumping
• Completed alternative simulations
• Completed draft of explanatory report
![Page 12: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Summary of Activities: Fall 2012 to Date
• Comparison of actual data with current DFC (Task 0)
• Extended GAM with updated pumping estimates from 2000 to 2011
• Updated future pumping
• Completed alternative simulations
• Completed draft of explanatory report
![Page 13: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Comparison of Actual Data with Current DFC (Task 0)
• Initial task to assess current DFC
• Address issues regarding use of “average” drawdown as DFCs
• Key element of “Factor 1” (Aquifer Uses and Conditions)
![Page 14: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
DFC and GAM Run
• How to compare actual data to DFC?
• How to compare actual data to results from an “idealized” model run?
• How to compare “average” drawdown over entire GMA (23 ft) with individual well measurements?
![Page 15: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Point-by-Point Comparison
• Comparisons at discrete locations
• Extract predicted groundwater levels/ drawdown from model files
• Compare to actual monitoring data
• Limited use of averaging
![Page 16: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
6,956 Wells in GMA 13 in the TWDB Database
• 1,844 wells with screen top and bottom
• 748 are completed in exactly one GAM layer
• 92 have 10 or more groundwater elevation measurements with at least one after 2000
![Page 17: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Hydrographs for 92 Wells
• Presented in Task 0 report
• Pumping (in immediate area of the well)
• Land surface elevation
• Screen top and bottom elevation
• Actual groundwater elevation
• Calibrated model groundwater elevation
• Simulated groundwater elevation (DFC run)
![Page 18: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Data Comparison Approach
• DFC Drawdown minus Actual Drawdown– Positive number means that actual groundwater
level is higher than DFC groundwater level• DFC drawdown = 10 ft
• Actual drawdown = 8 ft
• Difference = 2 ft
– Negative number means that actual groundwater level is lower than DFC groundwater level
![Page 21: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Data Comparison
• Well-by-well drawdown comparison requires:– Groundwater elevation measurement in late
1999/early 2000– Groundwater elevation measurement in year of
interest
• Task 0 report contains maps, tables, and graphs for the GMA and for each County
• Only one GMA-level example shown here
![Page 22: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
90 101113
96
13274
86
14274 76
132
45
Precipitation as % Average
![Page 26: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Observations
• Actual drawdown less than DFC drawdown– In most counties and in most years, MAG was
much higher than actual pumping
• Exception in 2010 and 2011– Increased use due to drought?– Increase use due to hydraulic fracturing water
use?– Decreased recharge due to drought?
![Page 27: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Summary of Activities: Fall 2012 to Date
• Comparison of actual data with current DFC (Task 0)
• Extended GAM with updated pumping estimates from 2000 to 2011
• Updated future pumping
• Completed alternative simulations
• Completed draft of explanatory report
![Page 28: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Updated Pumping 2000 to 2011
• More accurate pumping estimates – Based on TWDB Water Use Survey and GCD
input
• Provides ability to use end of 2011 as starting point for any drawdown based DFC
![Page 29: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Pumping Updates for 2000 to 2011
• WUS and GCD estimates were used as starting point– Included updated well locations in Gonzales and
Caldwell Counties
• “Calibrated” annual pumping on a county-aquifer basis based on groundwater elevation data from TWDB database
• Technical memorandum will be provided to TWDB
![Page 32: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Summary of Activities: Fall 2012 to Date
• Comparison of actual data with current DFC (Task 0)
• Extended GAM with updated pumping estimates from 2000 to 2011
• Updated future pumping
• Completed alternative simulations
• Completed draft of explanatory report
![Page 33: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Future Pumping Estimates(2012 to 2070)
• “Factor 2” (Water Supply Needs and Water Management Strategies)– TWDB MAG report associated with 2010 DFCs– DB12 data from TWDB (Sources, Demands,
Water Management Strategies)– Oil and Gas Water Use Estimates (BEG study)– SAWS input (email of June 27, 2013)– GCD input
![Page 34: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Summary of Activities: Fall 2012 to Date
• Comparison of actual data with current DFC (Task 0)
• Extended GAM with updated pumping estimates from 2000 to 2011
• Updated future pumping
• Completed alternative simulations
• Completed draft of explanatory report
![Page 35: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Alternative Simulations
• 59-year simulations (2012 to 2070)
• Use 2011 conditions as starting point– Based on model update that covered 2000 to
2011– Developed “Base Case” that included current
MAG and input from SAWS, GCDs
![Page 36: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Alternative Scenarios
• Scenario 1 – 0.7*Base Case
• Scenario 2 – 0.8*Base Case
• Scenario 3 – 0.9*Base Case
• Scenario 4 – Base Case
• Scenario 5 – 1.1*Base Case
• Scenario 6 – 1.2*Base Case
• Scenario 7 – 1.3*Base Case
![Page 37: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Simulation Output
• Average Drawdown (Maps, Tables, Graphs)– GMA– County– GCD– Aquifer– County-Aquifer– GCD-Aquifer
![Page 38: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000Pumping (AF/yr)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Dra
wd
ow
n (
ft)
Legend
Scenarios 1 to 7
Current DFC/MAG
GMA 13 Average Drawdown (ft)in 2070 (from 2011 Conditions)
![Page 39: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Other Simulation Outputs
• Maps, Tables and Graphs– Storage change– Outcrop vs. confined drawdown or storage
• Individual well summaries– Groundwater elevation– Drawdown (from 2011)– Height of water above (or below) top of screen
![Page 40: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Status of GAM Simulations
• Scenarios 1 to 7 presented to GMA 13 on October 9, 2013
• Requested input regarding changes by December 31, 2013– Two GCDs requested modifications to future
pumping• Gonzales UWCD
• Guadalupe County GCD
![Page 41: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Status of GAM Simulations• Made changes and completed Scenario 8
– Presented preliminary results to Guadalupe on February 13, 2014
• Complete summary report before next GMA 13 meeting (March 13, 2014)
• Discuss results at GMA 13 meeting– Accept as basis for proposed DFC– Make additional revisions
• Discuss level of detail of DFC expression
![Page 42: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Summary of Activities: Fall 2012 to Date
• Comparison of actual data with current DFC (Task 0)
• Extended GAM with updated pumping estimates from 2000 to 2011
• Updated future pumping
• Completed alternative simulations
• Completed draft of explanatory report
![Page 43: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Explanatory Report
• Statute requires that GMA 13 consider the nine factors (and the balancing) prior to adopting a “proposed” DFC
• An “explanatory” report is required when submitting “final” DFC to TWDB, and must include documentation of these factors– “Explanatory” report not required for
“proposed” DFC
![Page 44: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
GMA 13 Approach
• “Preliminary” explanatory report – Document factor review for “proposed” DFC– Useful documentation for GCDs during public
review period after “proposed” DFC is adopted
![Page 45: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Initial Draft of Explanatory Report
• Covers elements required by statute and rule– Generally follows outline suggested by TWDB
• Main text
• Appendices
![Page 46: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
![Page 47: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
1.0 Groundwater Management Area 13
• Overview of GMA 13 Geography and GCDs
![Page 48: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
2.0 Proposed Desired Future Condition
• To be completed after “Proposed” DFC adoption
• Draft resolution is Appendix A (no signature block yet)
![Page 49: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
3.0 Policy Justification
• Lists nine factors
• Includes balancing language
• To be completed after “Proposed” DFC is adopted
![Page 50: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
4.0 Technical Justification
• Discusses GAM used and its limitations
![Page 51: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
5.0 Factor Consideration
• Discussion of nine factors required by statute
![Page 52: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
5.1 Aquifer Uses and Conditions
• Pumping estimates (Appendix B)– 1999 Pumping from GAM– 2000 to 2008 TWDB Water Use Survey
estimates– Gonzales UWCD estimates – Plum Creek CD estimates
• Also references and includes Task 0 report as Appendix C
![Page 53: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
5.2 Water Supply Needs and Water Management Strategies
• Included in Appendix D– DB12 data from TWDB (Sources, Demands,
Water Management Strategies)– Oil and Gas Water Use Estimates (BEG study)– SAWS input (email of June 27, 2013)– GCD input– TWDB MAG report associated with 2010
DFCs
![Page 54: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
5.3 Hydrologic Conditions• 5.3.1 – Storage (from TWDB)
– Included as Appendix E
• 5.3.2 – Recharge, Inflows and Discharge (Appendix F)– Table of Average Historic Water Budget (from
February 19, 2010 GMA 13 meeting) with a column for proposed DFC (pending GMA 13 action)
– More detailed water budget data from GAM Run 09-034
![Page 55: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
5.4 Other Environmental Impacts
• Spring flow and groundwater-surface water interactions
• Covered in water budget discussion in Section 5.3.2 and data in Appendix F
![Page 56: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
5.5 Subsidence
• Not applicable
![Page 57: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
5.6 Socioeconomic Impacts
• State Water Plan strategies are an important foundation for this DFC
• Included Region K, L, and M socioeconomic reports completed by TWDB in 2010 in Appendix G– Assesses impacts of not meeting water needs
![Page 58: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
5.7 Impact on Private Property Rights
• Balancing discussion– Existing well impacts vs. impacts to property
owners who “conserved” groundwater
• Will include maps of well specific impacts based on Task 0 wells– Feet of water above/below top of screen– Feet of water above/below bottom of screen
![Page 59: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
5.8 Feasibility of Achieving DFC
• Monitoring discussion
• Recommendation for analyses similar to Task 0 evaluation
• Discussion on updates every five years
![Page 60: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
5.9 Other Information
• Included James Bene paper and presentation to GMA 13 as Appendix H
• Include comparison of model output to simple Darcian approach forwarded by Bill Klempt
![Page 61: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
6.0 Discussion of Other DFCs Considered
• To be completed
• Drawn from alternative simulations
![Page 62: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
7.0 Discussion of Other Recommendations
• To be completed once public hearings are held (i.e. part of final explanatory report)
![Page 63: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
8.0 References
• References cited in report
![Page 64: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Appendices
• A – DFC Resolution
• B – Historic use Estimates
• C – Task 0 report
• D – Various future pumping projections
• E – TWDB storage report
• F – Water budget estimates
• G – Socioeconomic reports
• H – Other information
![Page 65: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
TWDB Review
• TWDB staff developed a checklist of required elements
• Initiated a review of the draft
• All elements were found in draft (10/25/2013 email)
![Page 66: DFC Updates and Explanatory Reports in GMA 13, Bill Hutchison](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/5465fe60b4af9f4e3f8b52df/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Summary• GMA 13 has reviewed and compared current DFC
and actual data (resulted in extended GAM – pumping through 2011)
• GMA 13 has considered the relevant factors to “propose” a new DFC
• GMA 13 has completed alternative GAM simulations (more to be completed?)
• GMA 13 is reviewing draft of explanatory report
• Next GMA 13 meeting is March 13, 2014