Device design gallbladder.pdf

download Device design gallbladder.pdf

of 6

Transcript of Device design gallbladder.pdf

  • 8/10/2019 Device design gallbladder.pdf

    1/6

    Design and application of a new series of gallbladder endoscopes that facilitate

    gallstone removal without gallbladder excision

    Tie Qiao, Wan-Chao Huang, Xiao-Bing Luo, and Yang-De Zhang

    Citation: Review of Scientific Instruments 83, 015115 (2012); doi: 10.1063/1.3673472

    View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3673472

    View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/83/1?ver=pdfcov

    Published by the AIP Publishing

    This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded

    78.164.118.148 On: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:09:33

    http://scitation.aip.org/search?value1=Tie+Qiao&option1=authorhttp://scitation.aip.org/search?value1=Wan-Chao+Huang&option1=authorhttp://scitation.aip.org/search?value1=Xiao-Bing+Luo&option1=authorhttp://scitation.aip.org/search?value1=Yang-De+Zhang&option1=authorhttp://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi?ver=pdfcovhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3673472http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/83/1?ver=pdfcovhttp://scitation.aip.org/content/aip?ver=pdfcovhttp://scitation.aip.org/content/aip?ver=pdfcovhttp://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/83/1?ver=pdfcovhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3673472http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi?ver=pdfcovhttp://scitation.aip.org/search?value1=Yang-De+Zhang&option1=authorhttp://scitation.aip.org/search?value1=Xiao-Bing+Luo&option1=authorhttp://scitation.aip.org/search?value1=Wan-Chao+Huang&option1=authorhttp://scitation.aip.org/search?value1=Tie+Qiao&option1=authorhttp://oasc12039.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/www.aip.org/pt/adcenter/pdfcover_test/L-37/1081159092/x01/AIP-PT/Brooks_RSIDL_2_011514/Brooks-Granville_Phillips_Ad_2RGB.jpg/5532386d4f314a53757a6b4144615953?xhttp://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi?ver=pdfcov
  • 8/10/2019 Device design gallbladder.pdf

    2/6

    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 83, 015115 (2012)

    Design and application of a new series of gallbladder endoscopesthat facilitate gallstone removal without gallbladder excision

    Tie Qiao,1, a) Wan-Chao Huang,1 Xiao-Bing Luo,1 and Yang-De Zhang21The Second Peoples Hospital of Panyu District, Panyu, Guangzhou 511470, Peoples Republic of China2The National Hepatobiliary and Enteric Surgery Research Center, Central South University, Changsha,

    Hunan 410008, Peoples Republic of China

    (Received 8 August 2011; accepted 5 December 2011; published online 31 January 2012; corrected

    3 February 2012)

    In recent years, some Chinese doctors have proposed a new concept, gallstone removal without gall-

    bladder excision, along with transition of the medical model. As there is no specialized endoscope

    for gallstone removal without gallbladder excision, we designed and produced a new series of gall-

    bladder endoscopes and accessories that have already been given a Chinese invention patent (No.

    ZL200810199041.2). The design of these gallbladder endoscopes was based on the anatomy and

    physiology of the gallbladder, characteristics of gallbladder disease, ergonomics, and industrial de-

    sign. This series of gallbladder endoscopes underwent clinical trials in two hospitals appointed by

    the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The clinical trials showed that surgeries of

    gallstones, gallbladder polyps, and cystic duct calculus could be smoothly performed with these prod-

    ucts. In summary, this series of gallbladder endoscopes is safe, reliable, and effective for gallstone re-

    moval without gallbladder excision. This note comprehensively introduces the research and design of

    this series of gallbladder endoscopes. 2012 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3673472]

    I. INTRODUCTION

    Cholecystolithiasis is a common disease with a world-

    wide incidence of 10%. The traditional treatment method

    for more than 100 years has been cholecystectomy.1, 2 In

    recent years, gallstone removal without gallbladder excision

    has been proposed as a novel treatment for such disease, but

    implementation has been restricted by the lack of specialized

    endoscopes.

    What type of device could be used to carry out this novel

    treatment? We researched and designed a series of hard chole-

    cystoscopes and have clinically applied them since June 2007.

    II. DESIGN

    This series of hard cholecystoscopes includes the three-

    channel hard cholecystoscope, single-channel hard cholecys-

    toscope, mother-baby endoscope comprising a cholecysto-

    scope and cystic duct endoscope, ultrasonic cholecystoscope,

    and respective connection systems.3 The former two scopes

    were designed to treat gallbladder cavity lesions, the third was

    designed to treat cystic duct lesions, and the last was designed

    to treat lesions within the gallbladder wall.

    Pro/ENGINEER was used as 3D modeling software in

    the contour and physical design of these hard cholecysto-scopes because of its present acknowledgement and important

    position in the CAD(computer aided design)/CAE(computer

    aided engineering)/CAM (computer aided manufacturing)

    and 3D-modeling fields.4

    A gun type appearance was adopted in the contour de-

    sign, which means that the eyepiece input terminal was sim-

    ilar to a pistol grip, forming a 45 angle toward the principal

    a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail:[email protected]. Tel.: 86-20-34999950. Fax: 86-20-34994386.

    axis, while the photo-source input terminal was similar to a

    trigger, situated perpendicular to the principal axis. This de-

    sign may help doctors to operate very precisely, as if they are

    gripping a handgun while performing surgery.

    The optical system, another main part, was designed and

    modeled by ZEMAX. Because the optical system is the most

    delicate part in an endoscope, the requirement for the machin-

    ing and assembling of the lens is very high. The miniature and

    sophisticated lens were arranged in order and used in the op-

    tical systems of the three- or single-channel hard cholecysto-

    scopes. Meanwhile, delicate machines were chosen to grindand polish the surface of the lenses to ensure their coaxiality

    and optical capabilities. Lenses were arranged and assembled

    precisely and debugged repeatedly to attain the presupposed

    precision. Optical fibers were used to transfer images because

    they were more applicable to the optical system with lenses

    of 2.0 mm or less despite the fact that they had insufficient

    imaging quality.57 The parameters of the optical system of

    the endoscope as shown in TableI.

    A. Design outline of the three-channel hardcholecystoscope

    The three-channel hard cholecystoscope was specificallydesigned to handle large lesions in the gallbladder cavity.

    The inner diameter of its linear appliance channel is 3.0 mm,

    such that every surgical instrument with an outer diameter of

    2.8 mm or less (soft and hard biopsy forceps, stone-free bas-

    kets, electric coagulation hemostats, hemostatic bars, ultra-

    sonic mini-probes, laser probes, and microwave probes) is

    allowed to pass through. This design has some advantages

    in clinical application; for example, when gallstones are too

    large to be directly extracted from the patients body, the op-

    erator can use a ballistic gravel bar with air pressure to enter

    0034-6748/2012/83(1)/015115/5/$30.00 2012 American Institute of Physics83, 015115-1

    This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http:/ /scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded

    78.164.118.148 On: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:09:33

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3673472http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3673472http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3673472http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3673472mailto:%[email protected]:%[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3673472http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3673472http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3673472
  • 8/10/2019 Device design gallbladder.pdf

    3/6

    015115-2 Qiao et al. Rev. Sci. Instrum.83, 015115 (2012)

    TABLE I. Parameters of the optical system of the endoscope.

    Hard endoscope type Lens (mm) View direction Field angle Magnification Depth of field

    Three channel endoscope 2.8 10 6575 6 330 mm

    Single channel endoscope 2.0 0 and 30 5060 2 330 mm

    Cystic duct endoscope 1.2 10 5060 4 330 mm

    the gallbladder cavity through the channel, break the stonesinto pieces, and remove them in order.8, 9

    The front end of the cholecystoscope was designed as a

    circular pipe (length, diameter, and thickness of 203.5, 6.5,

    and 0.1 mm, respectively). The top of the pipe, termed the

    apex department, contains the lens, light-guided optical fibers,

    and three exit channels (water entry channel, water exit chan-

    nel, and appliance channel) (Fig.1).

    The three channels are the water entry channel

    (1.0 mm), water exit channel (1.0 mm), and appliance

    channel (3.0 mm). The valves of the water entry and exit

    channels stretch toward the different sides of the main parts

    and form an angle of 45 in relation to each other. In gen-

    eral, the two fluid entry and exit channels are used to maintainclear vision in the operational area. On the other side, either of

    them can be used as appliance channels as necessary so that

    instruments with a diameter of 0.8 mm or less can be used

    to enter the gallbladder cavity. Meanwhile, independent water

    entry and exit channels allow water to freely enter and exit the

    gallbladder cavity without affecting the operation. Moreover,

    the gallbladder cavity can be expanded by water injection to

    facilitate maintenance of a clear surgical field.

    B. Design outline of the single-channel hardcholecystoscope

    The single-channel hard cholecystoscope has generallybeen applied to surgery of common gallbladder lesions. It has

    FIG. 1. Apex of the three-channel hard cholecystoscope. (a) Optical lens,

    (b) light-guide fiber, (c) water entry, (d) appliance channel, and (e) water

    exit.

    a single appliance channel (2 mm) that is also used as wa-ter entry and exit channel. The terminal of the single-channel

    hard cholecystoscope (diameter 4.55 mm; length 267 mm) is

    smaller than that of the three-channel cholecystoscope.

    The top of the front end of this cholecystoscope, also

    termed the apex, contains the lens, exit of the appliance chan-

    nel, and light-guided optical fiber. The design of the apex is

    shown in Fig.2.

    Because of the body motion and gallbladder self-

    contraction, stones within the gallbladder cavity can move

    and disperse to the slender neck of the gallbladder or the cys-

    tic duct, which forms a natural angle toward the bottom of

    the gallbladder cavity. Considering the fact that the linear ter-

    minal of the single-channel hard cholecystoscope cannot bebent to enter these areas, a guiding cap made of silica gel can

    be used to form a sheath over the apex. The guiding cap has

    a bent angle from 10 to 30, and the SHORE hardness is

    55A. Meanwhile, its inner diameter is slightly smaller than

    the outer diameter of the work terminal of the endoscope, so

    the cap can be fixed on the apex by self-elasticity and friction

    force (Fig.3).

    C. Design outline of the cystic duct endoscope

    The cystic duct endoscope was specially designed based

    on the structure of the cystic duct. In general, the diameter

    FIG. 2. Schematic diagram of the apex of the single-channel hard cholecys-

    toscope. (a) Optical lens, (b) light-guide fiber, and (c) exit of the appliance

    channel.

    This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http:/ /scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded

    78.164.118.148 On: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:09:33

  • 8/10/2019 Device design gallbladder.pdf

    4/6

    015115-3 Qiao et al. Rev. Sci. Instrum.83, 015115 (2012)

    FIG. 3. Guiding cap with a bent angle and the single-channel hard cholecys-

    toscope. (a) Guiding cap with a bent angle and (b) the single-channel hard

    cholecystoscope.

    of the human cystic duct is 23 mm; thus, the diameter of

    the cystic duct endoscope must comply with this. The diam-

    eter of the front end is 2.8 mm, which not only ensures that

    the endoscope enters the cystic duct, but that it also forms a

    mother-baby endoscope with the three-channel hard chole-

    cystoscope. Depending on the independent photograph cen-

    ter and monitor, the mother-baby endoscope can simultane-

    ously display images of both the gallbladder cavity and cystic

    duct for the operator.3 Using the three-channel hard cholecys-

    toscope as a platform, the operator may precisely find the en-

    trance of the cystic duct and enter the duct through the appli-

    ance channel with the cystic duct endoscope for observation

    and operation.9, 10

    There are some differences between the single-channel

    hard cholecystoscope and cystic duct endoscope, although the

    design styles of both are basically similar:

    1. The diameter of the front end of the cystic duct endo-

    scope (2.8 mm) was less than that of the single-channel

    hard cholecystoscope (4.55 mm).2. The length of the front end of the cystic duct endo-

    scope was 516 mm, while that of the single-channel

    hard cholecystoscope was 370 mm. Such a design could

    be adaptable to the whole length of the mother scope

    and ensure enough operative space to avoid disturbance

    when the mother scope was used simultaneously with

    the cystic duct endoscope.

    3. The optical systems of both also differed because of dif-

    ferences in diameter and length of the front end.

    D. Design outline of the ultrasonic cholecystoscope

    In order to clearly observe the structure of the gallblad-

    der wall, the ultrasonic cholecystoscope, which integrates the

    subtle mini-ultrasonic probe and three-channel hard cholecys-

    toscope, was designed. Using the appliance channel of the

    three-channel hard cholecystoscope as a platform, the oper-

    ator can use the work terminal of the mini-ultrasonic probe to

    enter the gallbladder cavity and perform 3D stereo scanning

    and linear scanning of each layer of the gallbladder wall in

    a short distance. Thus, each layer of the gallbladder wall and

    even the stones hidden in the wall are clearly shown through

    the feedback images. In this way, doctors can eliminate all

    stones in the patients body, including intramural stones.1113

    FIG. 4. System schematic diagram of the ultrasonic cholecystoscope.

    (a) Three-channel hard cholecystoscope, (b) mini-ultrasonic probe, (c) host

    of cold light source, (d) host of ultrasonic system, (e) host of camera system,

    (f) function keyboard, and (g) monitor.

    A schematic diagram of the ultrasonic cholecystoscope is

    shown in Fig.4.

    The diameter and working frequency of the mini-

    ultrasonic probe were designed to be 2.02.6 mm and 7.5

    20 MHz, respectively. The sound beam penetration depth is

    4050 mm when the frequency is 7.5 MHz, which is mainly

    used for the diagnosis of pathological changes of the gall-bladder wall and surrounding organs. On the other hand, the

    20-mm sound beam penetration depth (12.520 MHz) is

    mainly used for tiny local lesions of the gallbladder cavity and

    wall. Based on the practical experience, the best photographic

    quality is obtained when the distance between the probe and

    tissue is 1020 mm.

    E. Design and selection of the series of hardcholecystoscope accessories

    The series of hard cholecystoscope accessories consisted

    of a gallbladder sludge-like stones absorbing box, host com-

    puter system for the camera, and cold light source.

    Sludge-like stones in the gallbladder cavity are as small

    as sandwith a diameterof 1 mmor less, and the mucousmem-

    brane of the gallbladder is rough. For this reason, sludge-like

    stones that form in the gallbladder can be compared with sand

    sprinkled on the carpet, and they are difficult to completely

    remove with common methods. The gallbladder sludge-like

    stones absorbing box looks like a small horn that comprises a

    large terminal part and a small tunnel connected to the front

    end of the cholecystoscope (Fig.5). The box can help doctors

    FIG. 5. Gallbladder sludge-like stones absorbing box. (a) Large-diameter

    terminal and (b) small-diameter terminal.

    This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http:/ /scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded

    78.164.118.148 On: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:09:33

  • 8/10/2019 Device design gallbladder.pdf

    5/6

    015115-4 Qiao et al. Rev. Sci. Instrum.83, 015115 (2012)

    FIG. 6. Schematic diagram of the use of the sludge-like stones absorbing

    box combined with the series of hard cholecystoscopes. (a) Negative-pressure

    device, (b) gallbladder cavity, (c) sludge-like stones absorbing box, and (d)

    three-channel hard cholecystoscope.

    to conduct many operative techniques, such as those involv-

    ing pushing, squeezing, and pressing. The box is a diaphanous

    pipe made of silica gel, and its hardness is SHORE 40A60A

    (the best is 55A). The water in/out channel is linked to the

    interface of the vacuum aspiration equipment, which can be

    used to absorb the sludge-like stones by negative pressure,

    store stones in the horn-like tunnel, and finally remove them

    thoroughly like a vacuum cleaner. A schematic diagram of the

    use of sludge-like stones absorbing box combined with series

    of hard cholecystoscopes is shown in Fig. 6.

    All interfaces of these cholecystoscopes adopt interna-

    tional standards so that they can connect to all standard cam-era systems worldwide.

    III. CONCLUSION

    This series of hard cholecystoscopes that facili-

    tate gallstone removal without gallbladder excision have

    been authorized by a Chinese invention patent (No.

    ZL200810199041.2) as specialized surgical instruments for

    cholecystolithiasis. Several hard endoscopes in this series

    have all been authorized by a Chinese invention patent,

    including the three-channel hard cholecystoscope (No.

    ZL200810026985.X), the single-channel hard cholecysto-

    scope (No. ZL200820188854.7), the ultrasonic cholecysto-scope (No. ZL2009200005583.1), and the mother-baby

    endoscope comprising a cholecystoscope and cystic duct en-

    doscope (No. ZL200910126984.7). In addition, the gallblad-

    der sludge-like stones absorbing box has also been authorized

    by a Chinese utility model patent (No. ZL200720049447.3).

    These patent products underwent clinical trials in two

    hospitals appointed by the State Administration of Traditional

    Chinese Medicine after successful research and development.

    With approval of the Medical Ethics Committee and informed

    consent of patients, 120 patients with the appropriate surgi-

    cal indications were continuously selected to undergo surgery,

    observation, and recording of surgical information from April

    16, 2009 to July 14, 2010. Surgical indications were as fol-

    lows: (1) gallstones or gallbladder polyps with clinical symp-

    toms, (2) gallbladder polyps with a diameter of 10 mm or

    more, and (3) gallbladder stones complicated by gallbladder

    polyps. All patients with gallbladder cancer or gallbladder at-

    rophy and those who could not tolerate gallbladder surgery

    were excluded. The ages of the 120 patients ranged from

    18 to 70 years. The patients comprised 48 males and 72 fe-

    males. A total of 98 patients had gallstones, 16 had gallblad-der polyps, and 6 had gallbladder stones complicated by gall-

    bladder polyps.

    The clinical trials have shown that compared with the

    OLYMPUS CHF-P20 choledochoscope, these hard cholecys-

    toscopes are associated with no significant difference in sur-

    gical safety. The lighting quality in the working distance

    (330 mm) showed no difference, but the image quality in

    this range was clearer (Fig. 7). Furthermore, the hard chole-

    cystoscopes also had an advantage in terms of the stabil-

    ity of the endoscope canal, flexibility, and reliability when

    combined with complementary products. This new series of

    FIG. 7. (Color) Images of every type of gallbladder lesion by the series of

    hard cholecystoscopes. (a) Stones in the gallbladder cavity, (b) intermural

    stones (stones shadow), (c) intermural stones (yellow ribbon), (d) tiny stones

    in gallbladder mucosa, (e) stone in cystic duct (cystic duct (1), stone (2)),

    and (f) gallbladder polyps, ultrasonic cholecystoscope (gallbladder cavity (1),

    gallbladder wall (2), gallbladder polyps (3)).

    This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http:/ /scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded

    78.164.118.148 On: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:09:33

  • 8/10/2019 Device design gallbladder.pdf

    6/6

    015115-5 Qiao et al. Rev. Sci. Instrum.83, 015115 (2012)

    endoscopes could be used to completely remove gallbladder

    cavity stones, intramural stones, tiny gallbladder stones, and

    cystic duct stones. Bile leakage, bleeding, and other adverse

    events did not occur intraoperatively or postoperatively in any

    patient. The average hospital stay was five days.

    All 120 patients were followed up after surgery. As of

    December 31, 2010, 109 patients were continuing follow-up,

    including five patients with recurrence of gallbladder stones.

    Recurrence of stones and polyps was determined based on theresults of the most recent B-type ultrasonic scanning exami-

    nation. Recurrence of gallbladder stones or polyps and other

    complications were not found in the remaining 104 patients.

    The short follow-up time was a limitation of this study.

    In summary, the development of this series of cholecys-

    toscopes offers instrumental support and the prospect of im-

    proved surgical outcomes for gallbladder stones and polyps

    without gallbladder excision.

    1Z. Yang-de,Endoscopics[M](Peoples Medical Publishing House, Beijing,

    2001), pp. 158220.2W. Meng-chao and W. Zai-de,Huang Jiasi Surgery[M](Peoples Medical

    Publishing House, Beijing, 2008), pp. 18201822.

    3Q. Tie, Z. Bao-shan, C. Xun-ru, and L. Jian-guo, The Patterns of ChiAO

    series of Hard Gallbladder endoscopy[M] (Military Medical Science Press,

    Beijing, 2010), pp. 727.4W. Liu-ji, D. Zhi-min, and H. Hua-mei, Fine Examples of Industrial Prod-

    uct Design Solution of Pro/engineer Wildfire 3.0. (Tsinghua University

    Press, Beijing, 2006), pp. 1541.5X. Feng and L. Qing-xiang, Precision Mechanical Design (Tsinghua

    University Press, Beijing, 2005), pp. 553557.6T. Qian, L. Yan-biao, and S. Li-qun, Optical Engineering (Tsinghua

    University Press, Beijing, 2006), pp. 3596.7

    L. Qing-xiang, W. Dong-sheng, and L. Yu-he,The Design of Modern Pre-cision Instruments (Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2004), pp. 1558

    and 192246.8Q. Tie, Z. Yang-de, Z. Bao-shan, F. Yu-yang, W. Xing-Qiang, W. Xiao-

    Feng, H. Wan-Chao, H. Hai-Yi, and Ma Rui-Hong, China J. Endoscopy

    16, 116 (2010).9Z. Yang-de, Q. Tie, F. Yu-yang, W. Xing-Qiang, W. Xiao-Feng, and H.

    Yi-Min, China J. Endoscopy 14, 449 (2008).10Z. Bao-shan, China J. Endoscopy8, 1 (2002).11J. A. Collett, R. B. Allan, R. J. Chisholm, I. R. Wilson, M. J. Burt, and

    B. A. Chapman, J. Ultrasound Med. 17, 207 (1998).12J. L. Thistle, P. A. Cleary, J. M. Lachin, M. P. Tyor, and T. Hersh, Ann.

    Intern. Med. 101, 171 (1984).13K. Sumiyama, C. J. Gostout, E. Rajan, T. A. Bakken, M. A. Knipschield,

    S. Chung, P. B. Cotton, R. H. Hawes, A. N. Kalloo, S. V. Kantsevoy, and

    P. J. Pasricha,Gastrointest. Endosc. 65, 1028 (2007).

    This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http:/ /scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded

    78 164 118 148 On: Thu 16 Jan 2014 17:09:33

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.01.010http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.01.010