Developmental Mathematics Redesign: Placement, Mathematics, Study Skills, and Teamwork
23
Developmental Mathematics Redesign: Placement, Mathematics, Study Skills, and Teamwork March 10, 2013 Innovations 2013 Dallas, Texas Dr. Tamara Carter and Dr. Max Simmons, Oklahoma City A Student’s Reflection Entering this class I was totally frightened about my chances at success. I’ve never been a good math student at all. But the way the class is set up totally allows you to succeed. They have all the resources readily available for any and all at any given time. It’s simply a matter of applying yourself. If you’ll do that you can’t fail with the way they implement the program. It’s been a real pleasure getting my feet wet while moving in a positive direction towards
description
A Student’s Reflection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Developmental Mathematics Redesign: Placement, Mathematics, Study Skills, and Teamwork
Developmental Mathematics Redesign: Placement, Mathematics, Study Skills, and Teamwork
March 10, 2013 Innovations 2013 Dallas, TexasDr. Tamara Carter and Dr. Max Simmons, Oklahoma City Community College
A Student’s ReflectionEntering this class I was totally frightened about my chances at success. I’ve never been a good math student at all. But the way the class is set up totally allows you to succeed. They have all the resources readily available for any and all at any given time. It’s simply a matter of applying yourself. If you’ll do that you can’t fail with the way they implement the program. It’s been a real pleasure getting my feet wet while moving in a positive direction towards College Algebra. Thanks sincerely.
07F 08 SP 08F 09 SP 09F 10 SP 10F CPM
11SP CPM
11F CPM
12SP CPM
12F CPM
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
45%48% 49%
47% 48%42%
55%57%
62% 63% 64%
22% 22% 22% 24% 22% 25%12%
16%12% 11% 10%
Developmental Mathematics at OCCC
Success Rates
Withdraw Rates
Percent of 11F students successful in CPM II based on MAP score
M1 70-75 M1 75-80 M1 80-85 M1 85-90 M1 90-95 M1 95-100 M2 30-35 M2 35-40 M2 40-45 M2 45-50 M2 50-55 M2 55-60 M2 60-65 M2 65-700
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Percent of 11F students successful in CPM III based on MAP score
M2 70-75 M2 75-80 M2 80-85 M2 85-90 M2 90-95 M2 95-1000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Percent of 11F students successful in CPM IV based on MAP score
M3 70-75 M3 80-85 M3 85-90 M3 90-95 M3 95-1000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Note: There were only 5 students in the last group
General Education Success
Note: These rates exclude students who earned an “I” or a “CIP”. FA10 was the first semester for the entire College Prep Math (CPM) sequence. Students in the “other” category might have taken the prerequisite more than a year ago or have demonstrated the prerequisite to an advisor.
Success in General Education Mathematics Classes (College Algebra, Contemporary Math, Statistics, & Precalculus) based on placement method
7
Spring 2011 College Algebra
A. B. C Total n
Passed CPM IV within last year 69% 137
Placed in with MAP (Math Assessment and Placement Exam)
82% 61
ACT >= 19 61% 237
Passed Int. Alg. within last year 53% 91
Other 60% 298
Total 63% 824
Spring 2011 College Algebra All General Ed
A. B. C Total n A. B. C Total n
Passed CPM IV within last year 69% 137 65% 168
Placed in with MAP (Math Assessment and Placement Exam)
82% 61 77% 91
ACT >= 19 61% 237 62% 329
Passed Int. Alg. within last year 53% 91 56% 134
Other 60% 298 63% 533
Total 63% 824 64% 1255
CPM I 1 classroom2 classes of students3 professional staffActive learning
Encourages deeper understanding and mastery of basic arithmetic skills
Large Group
Small Group
Computer
CPM II, III, and IV
Large Group
Small Group
Computer
3 classrooms4 classes of students5 professional staff35 minute rotations
Team TeachingMini-lectureGroup ActivitiesGuided PracticeStudy SkillsMath Lab support
CPM II, III, and IV
CPM I CPM II CPM III CPM IV Overall
8-week 223 of 354
1672 of 2688
2540 of 3701
1843 of 2518
6278 of 9261
16-week 284 of 595
1803 of 3691
887 of 1738
785 of 1292
3759of 7316
Success Rates: 8-week vs. 16-weekFall 2010 to Fall 2012 (excluding summers)
CPM I CPM II CPM III CPM IV Overall
8-week 63.0% 62.2% 68.6% 73.2% 67.8%
16-week 47.7% 48.8% 51.0% 60.8% 51.4%
General Education Success 10F-12F(excluding summers)
# Success # Enrollments Success Percentage
Contemporary Math 512 650 78.8%
CPM IV 137 167 82.0%
Other 375 483 77.6%
College Algebra 3102 5099 60.8%
CPM IV 828 1406 58.9%
Other 2274 3693 61.6%
Pre-Calculus 442 782 56.5%
CPM IV 74 151 49.0%
Other 368 631 58.3%
Statistics 767 1145 67.0%
CPM IV 89 152 58.6%
Other 678 993 68.3%
General Education Total
4823 7676 62.8%
College Algebra Success by SemesterSuccessful Total Enrollments Percentage Successful
10 Fall 648 1061 61.1%
Took CPM IV Other
13635
181043
72.2%60.9%
11 Spring 515 824 62.5%
Took CPM IV Other
145370
196628
74.0%58.9%
11 Fall 662 1079 61.4%
Took CPM IV Other
167495
275804
60.7%61.6%
12 Spring 529 915 57.8%
Took CPM IV Other
250279
436479
57.3%58.2%
12 Fall 748 1220 61.3%
Took CPM IV Other
253495
481739
52.6%67.0%
Grand Total 2795 4494 62.2%
Developmental Mathematics Redesign: Placement, Mathematics, Study Skills, and Teamwork
March 10, 2013 Innovations 2013 Dallas, TexasDr. Tamara Carter and Dr. Max Simmons, Oklahoma City Community College
[email protected] and [email protected]
A Student’s ReflectionEntering this class I was totally frightened about my chances at success. I’ve never been a good math student at all. But the way the class is set up totally allows you to succeed. They have all the resources readily available for any and all at any given time. It’s simply a matter of applying yourself. If you’ll do that you can’t fail with the way they implement the program. It’s been a real pleasure getting my feet wet while moving in a positive direction towards College Algebra. Thanks sincerely.
