Development of winter wheat varieties for organic farming
1
Development of winter wheat Development of winter wheat varieties varieties for organic farming for organic farming Vija Strazdina, Inga Jansone State Stende Cereals Breeding Institute, p/o Dizstende, Talsi region, LV-3258, Latvia E-mail [email protected] Introduction Winter wheat varieties realizing high yield and grain quality potential in conventional sistem often are less suitable for growing in organic conditions. There are some aspects of organic production that may make the genotypes required different from conventional system. Before to start the winter wheat breeding programm for organic farming it was neccessary to compare winter wheat genotypes performances in both systems and select more important indices for organic system. The aim of the research to compare yield and grain quality of winter wheat genotypes between conventional and organic farming systems and select suitable genotypes for organic farming. Materials and methods The trials with 9 winter wheat genotypes in 4 replications were set up at State Stende Cereal Breeding Institute paralelly in conventional breeding crop rotation field and certificied organic field in 2008/2009. In organic field the precrop was pea. In conventional field a precrop was the white mustard, fertilizers N-P-K 6-26-30 300 kg ha-1 and N150 kg ha-1was used. The grain yield and quality traits (crude protein , gluten content, Zeleny index, Test weight and 1000 kernel weight were evaluated in both farming systems and compared. Stastistical analyse were performed using Softwere packedge STASTISTICS Results The grain yield of 9 winter wheat wheat genotypes varied between 6.44 -8.79 t ha- 1, crude protein from 111.0 to 147.0 g kg-1, gluten content from 20.7% to 28.2%, Zeleny index from 32.8 to 54.3 mL, Volume weight from 806 to 879 g l-1 and TKW from 43.2 to 53.3 g in conventional crop rotation (C). In the organic field (O) the same genotypes realized yield 50.5% to 60.7 %, crude protein 76.9% to 95.8% and gluten content 67.0% to 96.1% in comparison with C system (Fig.1.). 1000 kernel weight (TKW) and Test weight (TW) of genotypes were more stable traits and a significant differences between growing systems were not found (Fig.2). In O field TKW varied from 96,7% to 101,9%, TKW- 82,4% to 102,1% in comparison with C farming. Three breeding lines (98-83, 99-115,02-28)selected in C crop rotation Fig.2. Test Weight ( III) and 1000 kernel weight ( IV) of winter wheat genotypes in C and O farming . Fig.1. Grain quality (protein content -I , gluten content-II) of winter wheat genotypes in C and O farming. Acknolegement.This study was performed with financial support of the Europen Social Fund cofinanced Project 2009/0218/1DP/1/1/1/2/0/09/APIA/VIAA/99 and Latvian Reseach Counsil Project 06.00.37. 29,9 29,6 28,9 27,8 27,4 22,6 28,2 20,7 19,1 16,8 17,7 20,9 18,4 15,7 18,9 17,05 20,8 20,0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 96-58 K rista Banga S Fredis L02-28 L99- 115 98-83 A1 00-178 % C onvention Organic 824 814 879 789 829 842 804 787 808 805 819 815 806 810 749 808 804 755 650 700 750 800 850 900 96-58 K rista Banga S Fredis L02- 28 L99- 115 98-83 A1 00-178 g L - Convention O rganic 133 145 144 147 137 117 112 139 110 106 100 102 114 105 90 107 107 98 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 g kg- Conventional O rganic 48,9 48,6 52,7 49,8 47,1 45,3 53,3 43,2 48,1 40,5 40,1 44,4 43,2 44,8 45,8 38,9 42,9 43,9 45,1 43,0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 96-58 K rista BangaS Fredis L02-28 L99-115 98-83 A1 00-178 vid g Conventional O rganic (I) (II) (III ) (IV)
-
Upload
keefe-bradley -
Category
Documents
-
view
26 -
download
4
description
Development of winter wheat varieties for organic farming. Vija Strazdina, Inga Jansone State Stende Cereals Breeding Institute, p/o Dizstende, Talsi region, LV-3258, Latvia E-mail [email protected]. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Development of winter wheat varieties for organic farming
Development of winter wheat varietiesDevelopment of winter wheat varietiesfor organic farmingfor organic farming
Vija Strazdina, Inga JansoneState Stende Cereals Breeding Institute, p/o Dizstende,
Talsi region, LV-3258, LatviaE-mail [email protected]
IntroductionWinter wheat varieties realizing high yield and grain quality potential in conventional sistem often are less suitable for growing in organic conditions. There are some aspects of organic production that may make the genotypes required different from conventional system. Before to start the winter wheat breeding programm for organic farming it was neccessary to compare winter wheat genotypes performances in both systems and select more important indices for organic system. The aim of the research to compare yield and grain quality of winter wheat genotypes between conventional and organic farming systems and select suitable genotypes for organic farming.
Materials and methodsThe trials with 9 winter wheat genotypes in 4 replications were set up at State Stende Cereal Breeding Institute paralelly in conventional breeding crop rotation field and certificied organic field in 2008/2009. In organic field the precrop was pea. In conventional field a precrop was the white mustard, fertilizers N-P-K 6-26-30 300 kg ha-1 and N150 kg ha-1was used. The grain yield and quality traits (crude protein , gluten content, Zeleny index, Test weight and 1000 kernel weight were evaluated in both farming systems and compared. Stastistical analyse were performed using Softwere packedge STASTISTICSResultsThe grain yield of 9 winter wheat wheat genotypes varied between 6.44 -8.79 t ha-1, crude protein from 111.0 to 147.0 g kg-1, gluten content from 20.7% to 28.2%, Zeleny index from 32.8 to 54.3 mL, Volume weight from 806 to 879 g l-1 and TKW from 43.2 to 53.3 g in conventional crop rotation (C). In the organic field (O) the same genotypes realized yield 50.5% to 60.7 %, crude protein 76.9% to 95.8% and gluten content 67.0% to 96.1% in comparison with C system (Fig.1.). 1000 kernel weight (TKW) and Test weight (TW) of genotypes were more stable traits and a significant differences between growing systems were not found (Fig.2). In O field TKW varied from 96,7% to 101,9%, TKW- 82,4% to 102,1% in comparison with C farming. Three breeding lines (98-83, 99-115,02-28)selected in C crop rotation were suitable for O farming.
Fig.2. Test Weight (III) and 1000 kernel weight (IV) of winter wheat genotypes in C and O farming .
Fig.1. Grain quality (protein content -I , gluten content-II) of winter wheat genotypes in C and O farming.
Acknolegement.This study was performed with financial support of the Europen Social Fund cofinanced Project 2009/0218/1DP/1/1/1/2/0/09/APIA/VIAA/99 and Latvian Reseach Counsil Project 06.00.37.
29,9 29,6 28,9 27,8 27,4
22,6
28,2
20,719,1
16,8 17,720,9
18,415,7
18,917,05
20,820,0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
96-58 Krista BangaS
Fredis L02-28 L99-115
98-83 A1 00-178
%
Convention Organic
824814
879
789
829842
804787
808 805819 815
806810
749
808 804
755
650
700
750
800
850
900
96-58 Krista BangaS
Fredis L02-28
L99-115
98-83 A1 00-178
g L
-1
Convention Organic
133145 144 147
137
117 112
139
110106 100 102114
10590
107 10798
020406080
100120140160
g k
g-1
Conventional Organic
48,9 48,652,7
49,847,1 45,3
53,3
43,248,1
40,5 40,144,4 43,2 44,8 45,8
38,942,9
43,945,1
43,0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
96-58 Krista Banga S Fredis L02-28 L99-115 98-83 A1 00-178 vid
g
Conventional Organic
(I)
(II)
(III)
(IV)
