Development of Uniform Blowing Procedures for Grass Seeds · Conclusions and Recommendations 1) The...

40
Development of Uniform Blowing Procedures for Grass Seeds Example [email protected] Seed Laboratory

Transcript of Development of Uniform Blowing Procedures for Grass Seeds · Conclusions and Recommendations 1) The...

Development of Uniform Blowing Procedures for Grass Seeds

Example

[email protected]

Seed Laboratory

Presentation Goals1. Importance of Uniform Blowing Point

2. Finding the correct blowing point.

3. Making calibration samples••••

4. Using/maintaining calibration samples

5. Remaining questions•

Importance of

Uniform Blowing Procedures

(UBP)

Current methodVisual-manual separation

Physical properties of empty and filled seeds

Blanks (Inert) Pure seed

1/3 rule

Verification of separated portions by 100-seed weight, TF

0.0000

0.0500

0.1000

0.1500

0.2000

0.2500

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25

samples

100 s

eed

wt/

g

seeds in blowings seeds in heavy portion

Recent Advances in AOSA

Using uniform set of Master calibration

Samples (MCS) to find the correct point

Using the Equivalent Air Velocity (EAV) to

reproduce the point indefinitely

UBP is needed for:

Tall fescue, Ryegrasses; Fine fescues; Poa

secunda; Koeleria macrantha; Bromus spp;

Urochloa ramosa; Panicum spp; Echinochloa

frumentosa; California oatgrass; Poa

numeralis; Paspalum vaginatum;

Deschammpsia cespitosa; Wheatgrass; and

other grasses.

Some people simply suggested UBP for “All

grasses”

General Blower

Separation by

blowingSample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

Time saved by using the

blowing procedure

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Number of Referres/Laboratories

Tim

e t

o c

om

ple

te t

he t

est

(min

)

Blowing method

AOSA method

Mean of all labs using the blowing method = 10 min; Sd = 3.6

Mean of all labs using the AOSA method = 43 min; Sd = 23.2

Each bar represents the mean of three samples.

1. Finding the

Optimum blowing point (OBP)

Finding the blowing point

Based on visual separation by 1/3 rule

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2

Pure Seed

Empty seed

OO

Air velocity (m/s)

Nu

mb

er

of

seed

s

Sample 1 Sample 2

Sample 3

Finding the BP by visual

assessment in•Paspalum

vaginatum seeds

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

1.1 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.7

Air Velocity (m/s)

Nu

mb

er o

f S

eed

s

Sam ple 4

Sam ple 8

Sam ple 2

Sam ple 3

Sam ple 1

Sam ple 5

Sam ple 6

Sam ple 7

Sam ple 6

Sam ple 8

Sam ple 7

Sam ple 2

Sam ple 1

Sam ple 3

Sam ple 4

Sam ple 5

Finding BP by Germination

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Germination %

Germination %

Air opening

Finding the BP by

germination

Percentage of germination of TF blowings at different air velocity values of

General blower 4

0

20

40

60

80

100

2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.8 4.1 4.3 control

Air Velocity (m/s)

Germ

inati

on

%

Low inert matter

Med inert matter

High inert matter

Finding the BP by germination in

Paspalum vaginatum

Percentage of paspalum germination at different air velocities

0

20

40

60

80

100

1.1 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.9 2 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.7 4 HF

Air Velocity m /s

Ge

rmin

ati

on %

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4

Sample 5 Sample 6 Sample 7 Sample 8

Germination examples of blowings & heavy portion

Germination exampless of blowings & heavy portion

3. Preparation of Master

Calibration samples (MCS)

0.0 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2

Air velocity m/s

Relativ

e N

o. o

f seed

s

Heavy fraction

(Red se eds)

(fully mature seeds)

Light fraction

(Gre en see ds)

(empty and under-developed seeds

( less than 1/3 endosperm development)

Optimum blowing point for TF at a certain blower

mix

red & green

Finding the blowing point for tall fescue

using a master calibration sample

Red structures represent pure seeds

Green structures represent inert

Verifying Uniformity of

Master Calibration Samples

1 . 0

1 . 5

2 . 0

2 . 5

3 . 0

3 . 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

S a m p le s

Air

velo

cit

y m

/s

B l o w e r 2

B l o w e r 4

B l o w e r 6

Master calibration samples

4. Use and maintenance of

master calibration samples

Finding the blowing point for tall fescue

using a master calibration sample

Air gate

opening

Equivalent

Air velocity

(EAV)

Heavy florets

in

Light fraction

Light florets in

Heavy fraction

13.5 2.8 m/s 13 31

11 32

16 35

------------- ------------ ------------ -----------

13.9 2.9 m/s 19 16

20 16

23 18

Average 20.7 16.7

------------ ------------

-

------------ -----------

14.1 3.0 m/s 35 8

37 10

36 9

Blower Calibration

Measure the Equivalent Air Velocity

When the UBP is used

on the purity working

sample the gate

opening is adjusted to

match the equivalent

air velocity value

established during the

calibration for the kind

of seed being tested.

This setting will be

blower specific!

D. Meyer CDFA/PPDC 2006

Amount of light-weight inert blown out from three blind samples

In-house verification across 7 General Blowers

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

General Blowers

% L

igh

t in

ert

blo

wn

Low inert content Med inert content High inert content

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Number of Referees/Laboratories

% lig

ht

inert

ma

tter

Sample 1 - Low inert Sample 2 - Med inert Sample 3 - High inert

Mean = 0.97; Sd = 0.06

Mean = 2.02; Sd = 0.14

Mean = 3.85; Sd = 0.25

Separation of lightweight inert

First year referee

Comparison of Total Inert by

UBP and ISTA

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

No. sample

% I

nert

ma

tter

Proposed blowing procedure ISTA method

Results of all samples are within tolerance using the proposed blowing procedure or ISTA method

Conclusions and

Recommendations1) The development of calibration samples should start in “correct

identification of the optimum blowing point”.

2) It is important to use a uniform set of Master Calibration Samples.

This is a condition for assuring uniformity across labs.

3) Care should be taken when using master calibration samples.

Uniformity of MCS should be monitored. MCS can/should be

reconstituted when necessary.

4) The use of EAV is critical in the system. It eliminates repeated use

and variation of MCS and it reproduces the OBP indefinitely. ••

Advantages and

OpportunitiesSimplicity

Repeatability

Efficiency/Cost control

UBP can be developed for other

grasses

Challenges1. Training and Education Needed

3. Researchers/Developers Needed

4. How are we going to deal with so

many species?????

One Final Idea!!!!

Air velocity profile of a general blower

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0

Air-gate opening of the blower

Eq

uiv

ale

nt

air

ve

loc

ity

(m

/s)

1.5

3.5

2.5

Acknowledgements

The Oregon Seed Council and the Oregon Department of

Agriculture.

AOSA-SCST laboratories for their questions, ideas,

guidance and participation in referees.

Grass seed cleaners for feedback on usefulness of

calibration samples.

OSU seed laboratory staff for their tireless research and

development effort.