Development of the port of Poti by strategic investor in the post-crisis world by Andrii Kuzmenko...
-
Upload
alondra-barnet -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of Development of the port of Poti by strategic investor in the post-crisis world by Andrii Kuzmenko...
Development of the port of Poti by strategic investor in the post-crisis world
by Andrii Kuzmenko
Poti Sea Port Corp. – an APM Terminals company
Statistics
3
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
6,124 6,127 6,6867,734 8,082
6,0817,292 7,163 7,456
Export17%
Import37%
Transit46%
Break bulk10%
Bulk36%
Liquid16%
Containers27%
Ro-Ro&Ferry11%
Cargo composition(2011)
‘000 tons
4
● Water area – 65.34 ha;
● Length of approach channel – 1.6 km;
● Length of breakwater – 1.8 km;
● Operating area – 30.0 ha;
● Present capacity – 9 million ton;
● After CAPEX capacity – 16-19 million ton;
● Total length of berth’s – 2.9 km;
● Total length of railway - 17.0 km;
● Direct access to hinterland ways;
● 100 hectare of port development area.
● 250 ha of free industrial zone nearby.
● Abundant and skilled workforce
● Water area – 65.34 ha;
● Length of approach channel – 1.6 km;
● Length of breakwater – 1.8 km;
● Operating area – 30.0 ha;
● Present capacity – 9 million ton;
● After CAPEX capacity – 16-19 million ton;
● Total length of berth’s – 2.9 km;
● Total length of railway - 17.0 km;
● Direct access to hinterland ways;
● 100 hectare of port development area.
● 250 ha of free industrial zone nearby.
● Abundant and skilled workforce
APM Terminals acquired 80% ofPoti Sea Port Corporation in May 2011
No depth inside (6-10 m) or on approach (12,5)
No turning circle inside (max LOA 160 m)
No long berths (150-250 m max)
No land beyond the quaywall (60-150 m max)
Present Poti: first look
Capacity – 8-9 mio mt PA with little reserves
Modern port requirements
Regional port Present Poti International port
Turning circle diameter, m 550 200 700
LOA at berths, m 230-270 170-200 310-330
Depth at berth, m 13,5 6,0-12,5 16,0
Depth at approach channel, m 14,5 12,5? 17,0
Land beyond quaywall, m 250-300 m 60-150 m 500 m
Rail connection upto 30 mio 25 mio? upto 40-50 mio
Road connection simplified restricted unrestricted
Conclusions:
1. Within current boundaries, Poti risks to stagnate.
2. However, thanks to the rail capacity, Poti does have future
3. To remain the major regional port, complete port overhaul is needed, creating at least panamax capacity on the nautical and land-side.
Guesstimate of hinterland traffic forecast after 2020
Major commodities Volume, mio mt Relevant capacity Notes
Crude oil 9,7 12,0 Export
Oil products 1,5 2,0 In and out
Containers 5,8 (1 mio TEU) 7,0 (1,2 mio) Domestic and transit
Non-food bulk 4,2 5,0 Coal, ore, cement, fertilizers
Food bulk 2,5 3,0 Grain, sugar, etc
Gencargo 2,8 3,5 Including reefer cargo
Rolling stock 0,6 0,8 Trucks, wagons and cars
TOTAL 27,1 33,3
Conclusions:
1. Above volumes do justify development of specialized terminals.2. Specialized terminals will allow for highest efficiency within limited area thus
reducing the investments and payback period.
What would it take to handle?Liquid bulk Bulk Bulk
foodGC+roro+
contCont. Cold
storeFertilizers
Berth # D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 10 12
Expected vessel DW, mt
150 000 80 000 60 000-80 000
50 000-60 000
60 000 80 000 15 60-70
Berth length, m 300(see 1)
300 300(see 2)
280 250(see 3)
280 200 270
Capacity per berth, mio mt
8,0 4,5 2,3 2 3,2 5,0 0,2 1,5
Estimated terminal area, sq.ms (see 4)
130 000 170 000 153 000 112 000 95 000 16 800(see 6)
52 100
Desirable terminal area sq.ms (see 5)
155 000 200 000 159 000 134 000 135 200(see 7)
10 000 82 000
Required installed capacity – 26,7 mio mt
Ideal Poti: how could it look
New approach channel
-17 m +2000 m
New terminals
ICT
Breakwater extension
+500 m
-16 mdredging
New breakwater
+ 360 m
-13,5 mdredging
Old port area
ICT external access road
Berth D1Oil
DW 150 000300x50x16
Berth D3Oil/Bulk
DW 80 000270x46x13
Berth D6 ContainersDW 80 000270x32x13
Cold store0,2 mio
17 000 m2Berth 12 Fertilizers
DW 70 000210x32x12,5
Fertilizers 1,5 mio
52 000 m2
Berth D2 Oil/Bulk
DW 80 000270x46x13
Berth D4Food bulk
DW 60 000200x32x13
Berth D5 Containers/
GC/ro-roDW 80 000230x46x13
Containers/GC/ro-ro3,2 mio
112 000 m2
Bulk2,3 mio
170 000 m2
Liquid bulk12,5 mio
130 000 m2
Containers5,0 mio
95 000 m2
325 mquaywall13,5 m
805 mquaywall13,5 m
D 3/4 212 mquaywall13,5 m
980 mquaywall13,5 m
Food bulk2,0 mio
15 300 m2
Poti NG look: berths & terminals
Poti NG: pros and cons of the proposed layout
Pros ConsSuggests minimum possible terminals/berth construction for a given cargo base
Subject to expansion to the non-available areas
Keeps minimal internal basin area Requires rehabilitation of the breakwater to allow 16 m dredging within
Focuses deep-water dredging next to port entrance, thus minimizing the cost
Seemingly tight on land available for terminals to reach required capacities, will require a deeper study and further prioritization/optimization of terminals borders and available land.
Wherever possible allows for overlaps of the vessels on adjacent berths
Some old berths may be out of operations due to navigational or operational constraints (lack of storage space)
Utilizes available basin and berths layout to the maximum possible
Calls for major investments commitment
Keeps old harbor for coastal trade, not wasting money on its rehab as no storage space available anyway
Has certain extra reserves of old berths to assist neighboring terminals or to handle some opportunity cargo
Utilizes all land available (main bottleneck)
Keeps open bulk handling away of residential areas
Utilizes ICT resources for container terminal
Significant investm
ents are
required
Poti NG: how much could it cost?Liquid bulk Bulk Bulk
foodGC+roro
+contCont. Idle GEO
navyTotal
Berth # D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D0 D3/4
Berth length, m 300 300 300 280 250 280 185 270
Est. quaywall, mio USD(60 000 USD/r.m.)
1,2(piles)
18 18 16,8 15,0 16,8 11,1 16,2 113,1
Est. reclamation, mio m3
0 0,81 0,9 0 0 0 0 0
Est. reclamation, mio USD (8 USD/m3)
0 6,5(0,8 mio m3)
7,2(0,9 mio m3)
0 0 0 0 0 13,7
Est. dredging volume,mio m3
1,5(-16m)
2,5(-13,5 m)
Est. dredging, mio USD (8 USD/m3)
12,0 20 32,0
Breakwater extension, mio USD (85 000 USD/r.m.)
73,1(860 m total)
73,1
Approach channel, mio USD (8 USD/m3)
11,2(1,4 mio m3: 160 m wide with 2x42 ms slopes )
11,2
Est. total for marine infrastructure, mio USD
243,1
Total new quay wall: 2165 m. Total dredging: 3,7 mio m3. Total reclamation: 1,7 mio cu.ms.
Is it
feasible?
While catering for:
1. Bigger ships2. Bigger/on-dock CY.3. Good productivity
4. Blocktrain container service
Something more realistic is required
15
• Construction starts in 2013;
• Construction to be completed: end of 2014;
• Planned length – 285 m;
• Construction starts in 2013;
• Construction to be completed: end of 2014;
• Planned length – 285 m;
Poti: realistic approach #1Reconstruction of berth 12
• Planned depth – 13.4 m;
• 3 X LHC 550 LIEBHERR harbor cranes;
• Planned depth – 13.4 m;
• 3 X LHC 550 LIEBHERR harbor cranes;
16
• Construction starts in 2013;
• Construction to be completed: end of 2014;
• Planned length – 270 m;
• Planned depth – 12.5 m;
• 3xMHC
• Construction starts in 2013;
• Construction to be completed: end of 2014;
• Planned length – 270 m;
• Planned depth – 12.5 m;
• 3xMHC
Poti: realistic approach #2Reconstruction of berth 12
19
ICT parameters
● Distance – 1,7 km
● Available square - 10 ha;
● Expansion in 2013 – 9 ha;
● Bonded road
● Public road;
● Rail link for full train;
● Direct access to hinterland ways;
● 100 ha of development area.
ICT parameters
● Distance – 1,7 km
● Available square - 10 ha;
● Expansion in 2013 – 9 ha;
● Bonded road
● Public road;
● Rail link for full train;
● Direct access to hinterland ways;
● 100 ha of development area.
Poti: realistic approachExpansion and connection of ICT
20
• To be completed in March 2014;• Planned area – 10.37 ha;• New rail line – 975m;• Customs road – 1688.2 m• Public road – 1700 m• Parking Area – 5000 m² • Full train handling
• To be completed in March 2014;• Planned area – 10.37 ha;• New rail line – 975m;• Customs road – 1688.2 m• Public road – 1700 m• Parking Area – 5000 m² • Full train handling
Background1. Poti had never had a proper container yard due to lack of storage space in the port2. That led to the usage of the external off-docks with negative effect on traffic and safety3. Now 12 ha of container yard will be added which is equal to the 40% of the whole existing port area (29.7 ha)4. Equipped with modern machinery it will ensure safe and efficient operation 5. New bonded road for port transport, public road and rail connection will be built.
Poti: realistic approachExpansion and connection of ICT
Berth 14Multipurpose terminal
23
● Length – 253 m;
● Depth – 8.4 m;
● Storage area – 13 200 sq. m;
● Equipment – 2 LHM (100 ton each);
● Handling capacity – 250 000 TEU/year;
● Length – 253 m;
● Depth – 8.4 m;
● Storage area – 13 200 sq. m;
● Equipment – 2 LHM (100 ton each);
● Handling capacity – 250 000 TEU/year;
Berth 7Container terminal
24
● Berth 7;
● Length – 221 m;
● Depth – 8.2 m;
● Storage area – 16 300 sq. m;
● Equipment – 3 portal crane (40 ton each);
● Handling capacity – 200 000 TEU/year;
● Berth 7;
● Length – 221 m;
● Depth – 8.2 m;
● Storage area – 16 300 sq. m;
● Equipment – 3 portal crane (40 ton each);
● Handling capacity – 200 000 TEU/year;
Inland Container Terminal(ICT)
25
● Total area – 8.97 ha;
● Car parking – 654 slots (15 500 sq.m);
● Stripping area – 240 TEU (12 900 sq.m);
● Empty storage – 1700 TEU (5 high, 18 880 sq.m);
● Full storage – 432 TEU (3 high, 15 630 sq.m);
● Total area – 8.97 ha;
● Car parking – 654 slots (15 500 sq.m);
● Stripping area – 240 TEU (12 900 sq.m);
● Empty storage – 1700 TEU (5 high, 18 880 sq.m);
● Full storage – 432 TEU (3 high, 15 630 sq.m);
Main points:
1. Complete overhaul of the old port requires enormous investments2. Commercial reality does not support reasonable payback
3. Nevertheless, port’s key problems must be attended4. Thus focused investments and improvements are required 5. All of above shall be based on the regional growth picture