Development of Improved Enzyme for Lignocellulosic Biomass ...
Transcript of Development of Improved Enzyme for Lignocellulosic Biomass ...
Mian LiBiomass Applications GroupGenencorPalo Alto, [email protected]
Development of Improved Enzyme for Lignocellulosic Biomass Conversion
4th European Bioethanol Technology MeetingDetmold, Germany, April 15-16, 2008
2
Today’s Presentation
Current Enzyme Technology for Fuel Ethanol from StarchThe Challenges of Cellulosic Ethanol and Genencor’s RoleFirst Biomass Enzyme-Accellerase™1000 and its applicationConclusions
3
CellFactory
Fuels
Chemicals
Polymers
Specialties
Enzym
esGlucose
MixedSugars
Sucrose
Sugar CaneBeet
Starch Grains
Lignocellulose
The BioRefinery
Co-Products
Upgraded Co-Products
4
Major Feedstocks in Starch Ethanol Production
Rice Triticale Wheat Rye Barley Corn Sorghum
USEurope
Asia Pacific
5
Enzymes for Fuel Ethanol Production from Starch
EnzymeLiquefying enzymes
Saccharifying enzymes
Protein hydrolyzing enzymes
Viscosity reduction enzymes
Granular starch hydrolyzing enzymes
PurposeThermostable alpha-amylases for liquefaction of starch at high temperatures
Glucoamylases and blends for hydrolysis of starch to glucose
Proteases for improved fermentation efficiency
Multi-component enzymes for wheat, barley & rye
Alpha-amylase and glucoamylase blend for processing of uncooked starch
Product nameSPEZYME® XTRASPEZYME® FREDMAXALIQ® ONE
G-ZYME ® 480 FERMENZYME ® L-400
FERMGEN ™
OPTIMASH ™ (wheat, rye and barley)
STARGEN ™ 001STARGEN ™ 002
6
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
BG
PY
gas
olin
eBiofuel Opportunity in US Gasoline Replacement
12-15 BGPY limitfor starch ethanol
Bush SOTU target: 30% (45BGPY)
% Gasoline Replacement.% Gasoline Replacement. (All USA information)
7
Sources of BiomassCourtesy of Rod Bothast
Wood chips
Switchgrass Corn stover
Sugarcane
Cottonwoods Paper
Wheat Straw
8
Cellulosic ethanol : Enzyme Cellulosic ethanol : Enzyme challengeschallenges
Biomass much more recalcitrant to hydrolysisComplex, synergistic mix of cellulases & hemicellulases neededEnd product inhibition, enzyme stability, non-productive binding…..Enzyme dosing is much higher than for starch
9
Hydrolyzing the β-1,4 linkage
Cellulose digestion requires at least 3 types of activities working synergistically:
• Exo-1,4-β-glucanase (cellobiohydrolase): processive, attacks reducing (CBH I) or non-reducing (CBH II) end of cellulose chain, releasing cellobiose units.
• Endo-1,4-β-glucanase: non-processive, attacks along chain; reduce dp and viscosity, creating more chain ends for the exo’s.
• Beta-glucosidase (β-glu): converts soluble oligosaccharides to glucose, relieving product inhibition.
Cellobiohydrolase
Endoglucanase
β-Glucosidase
1010
2nd Generation Biorefinery Concept and Challenge
Cost of EnzymesStarting ~$5/gal EtOHNeeded < 10c/gal EtOH
Pretreatment:AcidAlkali
MechanicalEtc.,
Fermentation
Product Recovery
LigninUtilization EthanolEthanol
C5 C6 C5/C6Organism Fermenting
EnzymaticCelluloseHydrolysis
Biomass
11
Advanced Cellulase Development Programs
Project Structure and Funding• U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) funded >$15 million over
a 4-year period beginning in June 2000• Sub-contract through the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL)• Genencor contributed ~$5 million
Goal: Improved Low Cost Cellulase for Biomass Conversion to Ethanol
• Original program targeted a 10-fold cellulase cost reduction• Program achieved a 30-fold reduction per gallon on NREL
model substrate
Awards• R&D Magazine, Top 100 Innovations, 2004
2008: Genencor proposal chosen for new DOE Enzyme Improvement subcontract
12
How Will the Market Emerge?
2008 to 2010 – pilot plants at 0.5 to ~ 2 MGPY (1,500 MT~3,000 MT)
2009 to 2012 – demonstration plants at 2 to 10 MGPY (6,000~30,000 MT)
2009 to 2014 – first commercial plants deployed @ 20 to 50 MPGY (60,000~ 150,000 MT)
2007 Unmet Need:Process developers & engineers need an enzyme solution that is
representative of final, optimal enzyme preparations so they can design their systems.
13
Http://www.genencor.com/cellulosicethanol
14
Accellerase™1000 Application
Hydrolysis of different pretreated lignocellulosic biomass
Process Development• Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation (SHF)• Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation (SSF)• Hybrid Saccharification and Fermentation (HSF)--pre-hydrolysis substrate for a period of
time between 4-16 hours at 50 C
Effect of additional nutrient of the unclarified enzyme on fermentation
15
Applications Data Across Different Biomass Substrates
Bagasse Corn Stover
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 1 2 3
Day(s)
% C
ellu
lose
dig
estib
ility
Accellerase 1000Spezyme CP
Softwood Pulp
0 1 2 3
Day(s)
Accellerase 1000Spezyme CP
0 1 2 3
Day(s)
Accellerase 1000
Acid pretreated sugar cane bagasse
Acid pretreated corn stover
Softwood pulp (Kappa = 14)
All samples with 7% cellulose loading, 50°C, and pH 5.0
16
Significantly Lower Cellobiose Levels During Hydrolysis
Sugar profiles of AccelleraseTM 1000 vs cellulase product Spezyme ® CP on acid pretreated corn stover (▲) and sugarcane bagasse (■), 7% cellulose loading, 50°C, and pH 5.0.
Cellobiose
Glucose
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 1 2 3
Day(s)
Suga
r con
cent
ratio
n (g
/L)
AccelleraseTM 1000Spezyme® CP
17
Enhanced SSF Performance
Ethanol profiles of AccelleraseTM 1000 vs. cellulase product Spezyme ® CP in SSF on sugarcane bagasse, 7% cellulose loading, 50°C, and pH 5.0.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 1 2 3
Day(s)
Etha
nol Y
ield
(g/l)
AccelleraseTM 1000Spezyme® CP
18
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (hr)
Etha
nol (
g/L)
acid-pretreated corn stover
acid-pretreated sugarcanebagasseSoftwood pulp
Theoretical Ethanol Yield
SSF of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass
Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of acid-pretreated corn stover, acid-pretreated sugar cane bagasse, and softwood pulp using Accellerase 1000 at 0.24 mL product /g cellulose at 7% cellulose loading, 38°C, and pH 5.0.
19
Effect of solids loading on SSF12.4% DS vs. 26% DS
Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of acid pretreated bagasse using Accellerase 1000 38°C, and pH 5.0.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (hr)
Etha
nol (
g/L)
7% cellulose13% cellulose
~ 7% V/V
20
Comparison of SSF, Hybrid Hydrolysis and Fermentation, and Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation—12.4% solids loading, 7% cellulose, APB
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 50 100
Time (hr)
Etha
nol C
once
ntra
tion
(g/L
) SSF
4 hr prehydrolysis
8hr prehydrolysis
16 hr prehydrolysis
Separate Hydrolysis andFermentation
21
Benefits of an Unclarified Product
Yeast Nutrients• 1 g/L Yeast Extract• 1 g/L Peptone• 1 g/L Urea
Urea supplementation used at full scale ethanol fermentation may be unnecessary!
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 1 2 3
Day(s)
Etha
nol Y
ield
(g/L
)
AccelleraseTM 1000 + yeast nutrientsAccelleraseTM 1000 - yeast nutrientsClarified AccelleraseTM - yeast nutrients
22
Conclusions
Genencor has launched its first cellulase product targeted at process developers for biomass application
• Synergistic effect of multiple enzyme activities including Endo, exoglucanase, β-glucosidase and hemicellulase for broad substrate application
• Ability to minimize residual cellobiose and increase saccharification rate & glucose concentration
• Ability to operate in different process configurations.
• Unclarified product with remaining nutrients from enzyme production available to the yeast in addition to the hydrolysis sugars after saccharification
Further improvements are on-going to meet the demand for• Improved performance• Lower cost
23
Genencor Biomass Team
R&D Team:Suzanne LantzEd LarenasBrad KelemenSteve KimNicole ChowMeredith FujdalaBob CaldwellLouise WallaceJasan ZimmermanBecky KongLuis Cascao-PereiraMike PepsinAlisha JarnaginSigrid PaechMegan HisJeff Pucci
Biomass Applications:Aaron Kelley Mian LiTom Huang Ryan WarnerBen Liu John McLaughlinChristina GutierrezColin Mitchinson
Business:Jack HuttnerScott PowerGeorg AnderlBjarne AdamsenLandon SteeleBrian CarterMichael Kolman
Plants:Mika RistimakiHenna LehtolaFrederik VaningelgemJing Yang
24