Development of a Health Effects-based Priority Ranking System for Air Emissions Reductions from Oil...

1
Development of a Health Effects-based Priority Ranking System for Air Emissions Reductions from Oil Development of a Health Effects-based Priority Ranking System for Air Emissions Reductions from Oil Refineries in Canada Refineries in Canada Stephanie Gower, Stephen McColl, Stephanie Gower, Stephen McColl, John Hicks, John Shortreed, Lorraine Craig John Hicks, John Shortreed, Lorraine Craig University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada In Canada, the National Air Issues Coordinating Committee (NAICC) is currently engaged in a process to determine how best to reduce air emissions from oil refineries. The NFPRER (National Framework for Petroleum Refinery Emission Reduction) is being developed with the input of stakeholders including industry, NGOs, and regulatory jurisdictions. One component of this framework is the development of a tool to help prioritize air emissions for reduction based on estimated health impacts. Background Background Future Research Future Research Further testing and validation Incorporating uncertainty analysis Sensitivity and importance analysis Examine implications of predictions for each refinery site Perform “what if” scenario analysis for priority exposure reductions (i.e how much % reduction required to move a substance down by one ranking level) To obtain the HEIDI II model program, user’s guide and technical report, please visit www.irr-neram.ca Users select the refinery of interest from the Inputs sheet: Identification of 20 quadrants /zones surrounding the Chevron Refinery in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 20 “Zones” were defined around each refinery. These were delineated by circular radii at 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 25 km from the centre of the refinery site, divided into northeast, southeast, southwest, and northwest quadrants. In each zone, the following were determined: Predicted concentration of each emitted chemical according to air dispersion model Population of youth (0-19 years), adults (20-59 years), and seniors (60+ years) Predicted case incidence of disease associated with each emitted chemical Predicted incidence can be summed across zones to calculate total predicted incidence in the region of the refinery resulting from each of its air emissions Geographical Exposure Mapping Geographical Exposure Mapping HEIDI II: Modular Structure HEIDI II: Modular Structure Air Exposure Module Health Effects Module Health Impacts Module NPRI annual emissions - air toxics - PM and PM precursors (NOx, SOx), Refinery-related air concentrations - carcinogenic air toxics - non-carcinogenic air toxics - PM2.5 Meteorolog y Concentration- Response factors (by age groups) 0-18 19-65 65+ Site- specific background air concentratio ns Predicted population case-incidence rates (sum across radial zones, by age groups) - cancer - non-cancer - cardiorespiratory illness related to CACs RANKING by number of incident cases RANKING by severity simple DALYs RANKING by severity complex DALYs Radial Zone populations Dispersion to Radial Zones sex-age group apportionment of disease morbidity and mortality Air degradation Modelling Dose-Response in Modelling Dose-Response in HEIDI II HEIDI II HEIDI II: Health Effects HEIDI II: Health Effects Indicators Decision Index Indicators Decision Index HEIDI II is an Excel spreadsheet-based model that prioritizes a series of air toxics and criteria air contaminants commonly emitted from Canadian oil refineries. It was developed according to the fundamental concepts of a Level 4 LCIA (life cycle impact analysis) as described by Pennington and Bare (2001). HEIDI II also incorporates several software switches that allow variation of model input parameters such as •stack height (metres) •average daily sunlight hours (for calculating photodegradation). •If a refinery reports emissions of zero for any chemicals, the user may opt to specify a percent of regulatory reporting thresholds as input in place of notional zero (below reporting Annual reported emissions: Environment Canada’s NPRI (National Pollutant Release Inventory) for Canada’s 20 active oil refineries Air dispersion: using a generic ISC3/AERMOD approach Photodegradation rates: SRC (Syracuse Research Corporation) database Ambient background levels of each substance: Environment Canada monitors Toxicity parameters for each substance for children, adults and seniors: Health Canada, EPA, CalEPA Population living in areas surrounding refinery: Canada Census data at dissemination area level (smallest geographical census subdivisions available) Data Sources Data Sources HEIDI II uses a linear non-threshold approach to model dose-response for carcinogens and criteria air contaminants (CACs) A linearized transform of log dose:probit approach was used to model dose-response for substances that may exhibit threshold-type behaviour. Substances that are included in HEIDI II Selected by a group of stakeholders including industry, Health Canada (government), and NGOs Secondary PM 2.5 from sulfuroxides (N H 4SO 4) Secondary PM 2.5 from nitrogen oxides (NH4NO 3) Prim ary PM 2.5 M ethyl isobutylketone M ethyltert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-H exane Phenol Propylene Styrene Sulphuric acid Vanadium and its com pounds Zinc (and its com pounds) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Am m onia (Total) BTEX (Benzene,Toluene, Ethylbenzene,Xylene) C yclohexane Dicyclopentadiene Diethanolam ine (and its salts) H ydrogen sulphide Isoprene M ercury (and its com pounds) M ethanol Methylethylketone 1,3-Butadiene Benzene Ethylene (as oxide) N ickel (and its com pounds) PAH (as benzo(a)pyrene) CACs (C riteria A ir C ontam inants) (linear,non-threshold dose-response) M odelled as N on-carcinogens (log dose:probitdose-response) M odelled as C arcinogens (linear,non-threshold dose- response) HEIDI II ranks substances emitted from each refinery in order of greatest predicted impact on human health, using one of three different methods: Ranking by Predicted Incidence Ranking by Predicted Incidence Ranking by Predicted Simple DALYs Ranking by Predicted Simple DALYs (Disability Adjusted Life Years) Ranking by Predicted Complex DALYs Ranking by Predicted Complex DALYs Model Output Model Output Model Input Model Input Parameters Parameters Acknowledgments of Support Acknowledgments of Support Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) CCME Health Prioritization Sub-group Exposure Exposure- response relationship response relationship (conventionalapproach) (conventionalapproach) Exposure level Exposure level Carcinogens non-threshold linear N on-carcinogens threshold ‘hockey-stick’ H ealth H ealth risk risk Threshold dose Exposure Exposure- response relationship response relationship (continuous approach) (continuous approach) Exposure level Exposure level Log Log H ealth risk H ealth risk C arcinogens non-threshold linear N on-carcinogens non-threshold Log(dose):probitlinear Probit Probit H ealth risk H ealth risk ED01 ED05 References References Pennington, D.W., and Bare, J.C. (2001). Comparison of chemical screening and ranking approaches: The waste minimization prioritization tool versus toxic equivalency potentials. Risk Analysis, vol. 21, No. 5, 897-912. Using the DALY approach, priority rankings can be calculated within each of the three chemical classes, or across all three classes together. Sample Output
  • date post

    18-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    212
  • download

    0

Transcript of Development of a Health Effects-based Priority Ranking System for Air Emissions Reductions from Oil...

Page 1: Development of a Health Effects-based Priority Ranking System for Air Emissions Reductions from Oil Refineries in Canada Stephanie Gower, Stephen McColl,John.

Development of a Health Effects-based Priority Ranking System for Air Emissions Reductions from Oil Refineries in CanadaDevelopment of a Health Effects-based Priority Ranking System for Air Emissions Reductions from Oil Refineries in Canada

  Stephanie Gower, Stephen McColl,Stephanie Gower, Stephen McColl, John Hicks, John Shortreed, Lorraine CraigJohn Hicks, John Shortreed, Lorraine Craig

University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada  

 In Canada, the National Air Issues Coordinating Committee (NAICC) is currently engaged in a process to determine how best to reduce air emissions from oil refineries. The NFPRER (National Framework for Petroleum Refinery Emission Reduction) is being developed with the input of stakeholders including industry, NGOs, and regulatory jurisdictions. One component of this framework is the development of a tool to help prioritize air emissions for reduction based on estimated health impacts.

BackgroundBackground

Future ResearchFuture ResearchFurther testing and validation

Incorporating uncertainty analysis

Sensitivity and importance analysis

Examine implications of predictions for each refinery site

Perform “what if” scenario analysis for priority exposure reductions (i.e how much % reduction required to move a substance down by one ranking level)

To obtain the HEIDI II model program, user’s guide and technical report, please visit www.irr-neram.ca

Users select the refinery of interest from the Inputs sheet:

Identification of 20 quadrants /zones surrounding the Chevron Refinery in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

20 “Zones” were defined around each refinery. These were delineated by circular radii at 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 25 km from the centre of the refinery site, divided into northeast, southeast, southwest, and northwest quadrants. In each zone, the following were determined:

Predicted concentration of each emitted chemical according to air dispersion model

Population of youth (0-19 years), adults (20-59 years), and seniors (60+ years)

Predicted case incidence of disease associated with each emitted chemical

Predicted incidence can be summed across zones to calculate total predicted incidence in the region of the refinery resulting from each of its air emissions

Geographical Exposure MappingGeographical Exposure MappingHEIDI II: Modular StructureHEIDI II: Modular Structure

Air Exposure Module

Health Effects Module

Health Impacts Module

NPRI annual emissions

- air toxics

- PM and PM precursors (NOx, SOx),

Refinery-related air concentrations

- carcinogenic air toxics

- non-carcinogenic air toxics

- PM2.5

Meteorology

Concentration-Response factors (by age groups)

0-18

19-65

65+

Site-specific background air concentrations

Predicted population case-incidence rates (sum across radial zones, by age groups)

- cancer

- non-cancer

- cardiorespiratory illness related to CACs

RANKING by number of incident cases

RANKING by severity simple DALYs

RANKING by severity complex DALYs

Radial Zone

populations

Dispersion to

Radial Zones

sex-age group apportionment of disease morbidity and mortality

Air degradation

Modelling Dose-Response in HEIDI IIModelling Dose-Response in HEIDI II

HEIDI II: Health Effects Indicators HEIDI II: Health Effects Indicators Decision IndexDecision IndexHEIDI II is an Excel spreadsheet-based model that prioritizes a series of air toxics and criteria air contaminants commonly emitted from Canadian oil refineries. It was developed according to the fundamental concepts of a Level 4 LCIA (life cycle impact analysis) as described by Pennington and Bare (2001).

HEIDI II also incorporates several software switches that allow variation of model input parameters such as

•stack height (metres)

•average daily sunlight hours (for calculating photodegradation).

•If a refinery reports emissions of zero for any chemicals, the user may opt to specify a percent of regulatory reporting thresholds as input in place of notional zero (below reporting threshold) values.

Annual reported emissions: Environment Canada’s NPRI (National Pollutant Release Inventory) for Canada’s 20 active oil refineries

Air dispersion: using a generic ISC3/AERMOD approach

Photodegradation rates: SRC (Syracuse Research Corporation) database

Ambient background levels of each substance: Environment Canada monitors

Toxicity parameters for each substance for children, adults and seniors: Health Canada, EPA, CalEPA

Population living in areas surrounding refinery: Canada Census data at dissemination area level (smallest geographical census subdivisions available)

Data SourcesData Sources

HEIDI II uses a linear non-threshold approach to model dose-response for carcinogens and criteria air contaminants (CACs)

A linearized transform of log dose:probit approach was used to model dose-response for substances that may exhibit threshold-type behaviour.

Substances that are included in HEIDI II

Selected by a group of stakeholders including industry, Health Canada (government), and NGOs

Modelled as Carcinogens(linear, non-threshold dose-response)

Modelled as Non-carcinogens(log dose: probit dose-respones)

CACs (Criteria Air Contaminants)(linear, non-threshold dose-response)

1,3-ButadieneBenzeneEthylene (as oxide)Nickel (and its compounds)PAH (as benzo(a)pyrene)

1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneAmmonia (Total)BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene)CyclohexaneDicyclopentadieneDiethanolamine (and its salts)Hydrogen sulphideIsopreneMercury (and its compounds)MethanolMethyl ethyl ketone

Methyl isobutyl ketoneMethyl tert-butyl etherNaphthalenen-HexanePhenolPropyleneStyreneSulphuric acidVanadium and its compoundsZinc (and its compounds)

Secondary PM2.5 from sulfur oxides (NH4SO4)

Secondary PM2.5 from nitrogen oxides (NH4NO3)

Primary PM2.5

Secondary PM2.5 from sulfur oxides (NH4SO4)

Secondary PM2.5 from nitrogen oxides (NH4NO3)

Primary PM2.5

Methyl isobutyl ketone

Methyl tert-butyl ether

Naphthalene

n-Hexane

Phenol

Propylene

StyreneSulphuric acid

Vanadium and its compounds

Zinc (and its compounds)

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene

Ammonia (Total)

BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene)

CyclohexaneDicyclopentadiene

Diethanolamine (and its salts)

Hydrogen sulphide

Isoprene

Mercury (and its compounds)Methanol

Methyl ethyl ketone

1,3-Butadiene

Benzene

Ethylene (as oxide)

Nickel (and its compounds)

PAH (as benzo(a)pyrene)

CACs (Criteria Air Contaminants)

(linear, non-threshold dose-response)

Modelled as Non-carcinogens

(log dose: probit dose-response)

Modelled as Carcinogens

(linear, non-threshold dose-response)

HEIDI II ranks substances emitted from each refinery in order of greatest predicted impact on human health, using one of three different methods:

Ranking by Predicted IncidenceRanking by Predicted Incidence

Ranking by Predicted Simple DALYsRanking by Predicted Simple DALYs (Disability Adjusted Life Years)

Ranking by Predicted Complex DALYsRanking by Predicted Complex DALYs

Model OutputModel Output

Model Input ParametersModel Input Parameters

Acknowledgments of SupportAcknowledgments of SupportDepartment of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) CCME Health Prioritization Sub-group

ExposureExposure--response relationship response relationship (conventional approach)(conventional approach)

Exposure levelExposure level

Carcinogensnon-threshold

linear

Non-carcinogensthreshold

‘hockey-stick’

HealthHealthriskrisk

Threshold dose

ExposureExposure--response relationship response relationship (continuous approach)(continuous approach)

Exposure levelExposure level

LogLogHealth riskHealth risk

Carcinogensnon-threshold

linear

Non-carcinogensnon-threshold

Log(dose):probit linearProbitProbitHealth riskHealth risk

ED01

ED05

ReferencesReferencesPennington, D.W., and Bare, J.C. (2001). Comparison of chemical screening and ranking approaches: The waste minimization prioritization tool versus toxic equivalency potentials. Risk Analysis, vol. 21, No. 5, 897-912.

Using the DALY approach, priority rankings can be calculated within each of the three chemical classes, or across all three classes together.

Sample Output