Dissolution test strategies for colon- targeting drug products
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF DISSOLUTION TEST …
Transcript of DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF DISSOLUTION TEST …
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2034
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF DISSOLUTION TEST
METHOD FOR ALISKIREN IN TABLET BY HPLC
Kiran N. Kale and Krishna R. Gupta*
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Smt Kishoritai Bhoyar College of Pharmacy,
New Kamptee, Nagpur (MS)
ABSTRACT
A dissolution test method was developed and validated for the Quality
control of Aliskiren in its tablet dosage form using RP-HPLC method.
The dissolution condition includes USP apparatus II at a paddle
rotation rate of 50 rpm and 900 mL of 0.1N HCL buffer at
37°C±0.5°C. The described method showed good results under
optimized conditions. The in-vitro release was evaluated on
Hyperchrom- ODS 5µ C18 column (250 X 4.6 mm) with flow rate was
1.0mL/ min and detection wavelength 280nm. The mobile phase was
prepared by mixing Acetonitrile and 0.05 M KH2PO4 Buffer
(45:55v/v) and pH was adjusted to 2.5 with 10% Ortho –phosphoric
acid. The developed method was successfully validated according to
USP Guidelines. The proposed method for dissolution test in tablet
formulation showed reliable, precise, accurate results. Hence this method could be used in
routine monitoring of the quality control of the Aliskiren in its tablet dosage form.
KEYWORDS: Dissolution test; HPLC; Aliskiren; validation.
INTRODUCTION
Dissolution is a technique in which a solid substance solubilises in a given solvent i.e. Mass
transfer from the solid surface to the liquid phase. It is the primary quality control test to
determine whether a drug product can release its active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) in a
timely manner.[1]
Dissolution test is required for various dosage forms for product release
testing. It is also commonly used as a predictor of the in vivo performance of a drug product.
The basic destination of dissolution testing is to allow the measurement of bioavailability of a
dose in addition to bioequivalence of batch to batch. The focus of dissolution testing in QC is
WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
SJIF Impact Factor 5.210
Volume 4, Issue 10, 2034-2049 Research Article ISSN 2278 – 4357
Article Received on
17 Aug 2015,
Revised on 09 Sep 2015,
Accepted on 29 Sep 2015
*Correspondence for
Author
Krishna R. Gupta
Department of
Pharmaceutical
Chemistry, Smt Kishoritai
Bhoyar College of
Pharmacy, New Kamptee,
Nagpur (MS).
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2035
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
batch consistency and detection of manufacturing deviations. The test should be designed to
demonstrate that the dosage forms were manufactured according to specifications and all
critical manufacturing steps result in a consistent product. In vitro dissolution data, together
with bioavaibility and chemistry, manufacturing and control data, is a critical component of
any new drug application (NDA) submitted to the FDA.[2]
Aliskiren Hemifumarate (Alsk) chemically described as (2(2S,4S,5S,7S)-5-amino-N-(2-
carbamoyl-2,2-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-7-{[4-methoxy-3-(3 methoxypropoxy)phenyl]
methyl}-8-methyl-2-(propan-2-yl) nonanamide .(Fig. 1) is an orally active rennin inhibitor
for the treatment of essential hypertension and heart failure. Aliskiren metabolized slowly in
the body resulting in stronger half lives which restrict it once a day dosing.[3,4]
Literature survey reveals that few spectrophotometric methods and HPLC methods for assay
has been reported for the estimation of Aliskiren alone or in combination with other
antihypertensive agents in pharmaceutical formulations 3-10
. Literature survey revealed no
methods are reported for dissolution test by RP-HPLC method. The present work describes
the development and validation of a RP-HPLC method for dissolution test analysis for
Aliskiren, which was then optimized on the basis of solubility and stability considerations.
METHOD AND MATERIALS
Aliskiren Hemifumarate was kindly obtained as a gift sample from Morepen Lab. Ltd.
(Delhi). Commercial tablets containing Aliskiren 150mg was procured from the local chemist
shop manufactured by Novartis. Acetonitrile, used was of HPLC grade. Double distilled
water was used for preparing both dissolution media and HPLC mobile phase. Other
chemicals were of either AR grade or GR grade.
INSTRUMENTATION
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2036
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Dissolution apparatus USPXVIII, Model no. EF 1 W, Electrolab Pvt. Ltd was used for
dissolution. Chromatographic separation was performed on Analytical Technology Limited
isocratic system consisted of hyperchrome ODS 5µ C18 column (250 X 4.6 mm), Uv-3000
detector and P-3000 Pump, Rheodyne injector with 20μL capacity. The mobile phase
comprised of 0.05M Potassium Dihydrogen phosphate Buffer: Acetonitrile, pH 2.5 (55:45) at
flow rate 1.0 mL/min. The mobile phase was filtered through a 0.45 μ membrane filter and
sonicated for 15min. Analysis was performed at ambient temperature. The detection was
monitored at 280nm.
Selection of Wavelength
The standard solutions aliskiren was prepared and subjected to U.V. spectrophotometeric
study to determine λ max of drug using mobile phase as blank solution. Aliskiren shows
maximum absorption at 280nm. The wavelength was selected as 280 nm, such that the drug
exhibit sufficient absorbance at the selected wavelength. The spectrum recorded was shown
in Fig. 2
-1
7
0
2
4
6
200 400250 300 350
Abs
Wavelength [nm]
Fig. 2: UV spectra of Aliskiren standard solution
Preparation of Mobile Phase
Preparation of 0.05M Phoshphate Buffer solution: Potassium Di hydrogen orthophosphate, 7g
was dissolved in 1000 mL of water and Mixed, pH adjusted to 2.5 using ortho-phosphoric
acid, sonicated to degas the buffer.
The mobile phase was prepared by mixing Acetonitrile and Buffer in the ratio of 45:55v/v.
The mobile phase was filtered through nylon 0.45μm membrane filter. The same mobile
phase was used as diluents.
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2037
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Aliskiren stock solution
A standard stock solution of Aliskiren was prepared in mobile having the concentration of
1mg/mL. A 2.0 mL portion of the above solution was further diluted up to 25.0 mL with
mobile phase (80μg/mL).
System Suitability Parameters
System suitability tests were carried out by making five replicate injections of a standard
solution containing 80μg/mL of aliskiren and analyzing the chromatograms for peak area,
theoretical plates, RSD and tailing factor. Triplicate of 20 μL injections were utilized for each
analysis. The results are shown in Table 1
Table 1: Result of System Suitability Studies
Solubility Studies
The in vitro studies were performed using different dissolution conditions. According to USP
32, dissolution medium may be water, an aqueous solution (typically pH 4.0 to 8.0) or a
dilute acid solution (0.001 to 0.1mol L-1 HCl). Due to the drug is a hydrophilic molecule
with high aqueous solubility, surfactants and electrolytes were not added.[10,11]
Dissolution Test Conditions
Drug release tests were carried out with paddle method (USP apparatus II) at 50 rpm and 75
rpm, dissolution volume of 900 mL. The temperature of the cell was maintained
Sr. No.
Standard
Weight
Taken(mg)
A.U.C of ASK
(mV)
1
~167.0
279.78
2 279.27
3 278.77
4 278.54
5 279.04
Mean 279.08
±S.D. 0.174
%RSD 0.1714
Theoretical plate/column 7255
Retention time 3.893
Asymmetry 1.123
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2038
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
at37°C±0.5°C by using a thermostatic bath. Various dissolution media’s were tried out of
which 0.1N HCl buffer was selected. Weighed and dropped 1 tablet in each of the six
dissolution vessel containing 0.1N HCL for the respective drug under analysis. Sampling
aliquots of 10.0 mL were withdrawn at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60 min and infinity time interval
and replaced with an equal volume of the fresh medium to maintain a constant total volume.
After the end of each test time, sample aliquots were filtered and quantified. The percentage
content was calculated by validated HPLC method and these contents results were used to
calculate the percentage release on each time of dissolution.
Dissolution Method Parameter Optimization
Change in the USP Apparatus
0.1 N HCL was selected as dissolution media to study the effect of change in USP apparatus
due to high solubility of Aliskiren in 0.1 N HCL .A media volume of 900 mL was kept
constant as in trial and error basis the dissolution was performed on two different USP
apparatus.The results were obtained for Aliskiren. The % Drug release in different apparatus
was calculated.
Change in the Volume of Dissolution Media
The dissolution media was kept same as used in the above study where as dissolution was
performed using USP II with media volume varied from 1000 mL to 500 mL. The % release
was calculated.
Change in Dissolution Media (Buffer)
Phosphate buffer [pH 5.0] and phosphate buffer [pH 6.8] were used as dissolution media,
with a media volume of 900 mL as above. The % release was calculated.
Method Validation
The dissolution test method was validated to through the determination of linearity, precision,
accuracy, solution stability. Prior to injecting sample solutions, the column was equilibrated
for at least 30 min with the mobile phase flowing through the system.
1. Linearity
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2039
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
To assess the linearity, 10%-200% level of target concentration (83.33μg/mL for Aliskiren)
solutions were prepared and chromatographed. The peak area of each solution was noted. The
plot of concentration vs area is shown in Fig. 3
Fig. 3: Graph showing linearity of Aliskiren at different concentration
2. Precision
The precision of the method was determined by measuring the precision expressed as %
RSD. Tablet samples were subjected to dissolution test conditions 900 mL of dissolution
medium (0.1 N HCL) preheated at 37°C±0.5°C, paddle with stirring rate of 50 rpm).Test
solutions obtained from dissolution were chromatographed using optimized chromatographic
conditions. Thus, the %RSD was calculated ascertaining the precision of the method.
3. Accuracy
The accuracy was evaluated for the proposed method by spiking method i.e. adding known
amount of Aliskiren and standard drug (30%-125% ) to that of target concentration in the
dissolution medium considering the label claim of respective drug at 100% drug target
concentration [167 μg of aliskiren ] and performing the dissolution test. Each solution were
analysed in triplicate. The accuracy was calculated as the percentage of the drug recovered
from the formulation matrix. Total amount of drug estimated was calculated using following
formula-
Total amt of drug estimated - Label claim
% Recovery = -------------------------------------------------- X 100
Amt of drug (mg) added
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2040
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Where, At = Peak area of test sample, As= Peak area of standard sample Ws = Weight of
standard, V1 = Volume of diluent usedfor dissolving the standard, V2 = Amount of volume
taken from ‘V1’, V3 = Volume used to dilute the ‘V2’, up to mark,V4 = Volume of diluent
used for dissolving the test, L= Label claim.
4. Range
The range study was performed to show the range of method in which method is linear,
accurate and precise. The test solutions prepared for accuracy study were used for the range
determination.
5. Ruggedness
a. Standard Solution Stability
The standard solution stability was analyzed over as specified period of time, verifying the
response of the standard solution. Five injections of standard solution were injected at 0th
hr,
24th
hr and 48th
hr and the chromatograms were recorded. The relative standard deviation
was calculated for the area of standard.
b. Test Solution Stability
The test solution stability was analyzed over a specified period of time, verifying the
response of the sample solution stored at bench top condition (25°C) and refrigeration (5°C).
The chromatograms were recorded using optimized chromatographic conditions HPLC
method from.
6. Robustness of Test Method
The robustness of an analytical procedure is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by
small, but deliberate variations in method parameters and provides an indication of its
reliability during normal usage. The robustness was carried out for following parameters:
a. Change in flow rate
b. Change in pH of mobile phase
c. Change in detection wavelength
d. Change in mobile phase composition
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2041
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
HPLC method development and optimization
The optimized chromatographic condition mentioned below was kept constant throughout the
experimentation and mobile phase was allowed to equilibrate with stationary phase which
was indicated by a steady line.
Column - Hyperchrome ODS 5 μ C18 column (250 X 4.6mm)
Mobile Phase - Acetonitrile and Buffer pH 2.5 (45:55 v/v)
Detection Wavelength - 280nm
Flow rate - 1.0 mL/min
Temperature (Ambient) - 28-30°C
Injection volume - 20 μL
A 20 μL solution of above mix standard was injected through manual injector and
chromatogram was recorded. A standard chromatogram for Aliskiren and blank so recorded
is shown in Fig. 4a and 4b.
Optimization of Dissolution Method Parameters for Estimation of Alikiren
Various dissolutions were performed to optimize the parameters like dissolution media,
dissolution media volume, apparatus and rpm, using the optimized chromatographic
conditions and the solubility data of the drugs to select a set of parameter that will give
maximum % release of the drug. The chromatograms of dissolution analysis of formulation
under study at selected intervals recorded under optimized chromatographic parameters are
shown in Fig. (5a-5h)
Fig. 4a: Chromatogram of standard under optimized condition
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2042
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Fig. 4b: Chromatogram for Blank
Fig. 5a: Chromatogram for Test sample at 5 min
Fig. 5b: Chromatogram for Test sample at 10 min
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2043
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Fig. 5c: Chromatogram for Test sample at 15min
Fig. 5d: Chromatogram for Test sample at 20min
Fig. 5e: Chromatogram for Test sample at 30min
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2044
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Fig. 5f: Chromatogram for Test sample at 45min
Fig. 5g: Chromatogram for Test sample at 60min
Fig. 5h: Chromatogram for Test sample at infinity
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2045
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Change in USP Apparatus
The result of % release of drug is shown in Table 2. From the table, it was observed that the
release of drug in USP I was slow as compared to USP II. Also the release of drug at 50 rpm
was found to be optimum as compared to other rpm conditions; therefore USP II and 50 rpm
were selected as one of the optimized dissolution parameter and were further used in the
experimentation.
Table 2: Results Showing Effect of Change in USP Apparatus
Change in the Volume of Dissolution Media
The result of % release of drug is shown in Table 3. From the table, it can be observed that
the percent drug release in a media volume using 1000 mL and 500 mL was found to be less
as compared to a media volume of 900 mL. Hence media volume of 900 mL was selected as
one of the optimized dissolution parameter and was further used in the experimentation.
Table 3: Results Showing Effect of Change in Volume of Dissolution Media
Time
points
Mins
Dissolution Medium: 0.1N HCl Dissolution Volume:
900 mL
Apparatus: USP-I Apparatus: USP-II
% Release at RPM
50 75 50 75
Mean ±SD Mean ±SD Mean ±SD Mean ±SD
5 4.78 0.21 7.94 0.24 12.07 0.12 16.60 0.05
10 10.50 0.14 12.98 0.52 25.52 0.26 24.48 0.08
15 21.24 0.52 26.89 0.45 34.71 0.14 46.13 0.22
20 30.37 0.32 34.18 0.32 53.63 0.22 61.41 0.11
30 44.28 0.10 49.76 0.33 75.35 0.30 77.28 0.02
45 60.62 0.02 72.12 0.12 85.23 0.27 81.94 0.35
60 76.82 0.45 83.89 0.12 99.39 0.20 86.38 0.44
Infinity 79.97 0.14 86.36 0.17 101.29 0.11 95.21 0.12
ASK
Dissolution Media:0.1N HCl Apparatus: USP-II
900mL 500mL 1000mL
% Release at RPM
Time
points
50 75 50 75 50 75
Mean ±SD Mean ±SD Mean ±SD Mean ±SD Mean ±SD Mean ±SD
5 13.18 0.12 16.90 0.14 7.39 0.10 9.90 0.12 5.88 0.22 8.79 0.21
10 26.12 0.25 25.22 0.42 16.88 0.25 21.50 0.20 17.05 0.35 21.55 0.32
15 34.58 0.08 46.78 0.19 31.03 0.12 39.13 0.06 29.63 0.10 34.85 0.14
20 54.95 0.19 61.58 0.35 39.35 0.31 50.37 0.19 42.96 0.08 44.61 0.11
30 76.95 0.54 77.50 0.54 55.54 0.02 67.10 0.13 55.39 0.18 59.71 0.20
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2046
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Change in Dissolution Media (Buffer)
The result of % release of drug is shown in Table 4. From the Table, it was observed that the
release rate of the drug obtained was less in phosphate buffer (pH 5.0) and Phosphate Buffer
(pH 6.8) compared to 0.1 N HCl at Q point 60 min therefore, 0.1N HCl was selected as
optimized dissolution media and further used in the experimentation. The finalized
dissolution parameter selected for the dissolution test method of Aliskiren are shown in Table
5 and percent release of drug under final chromatographic and final dissolution parameters
are shown in Table 6 for aliskiren.
Table 4: Results Showing Effect of Change in Dissolution Medium
Table 5: Final Dissolution Method Parameters for the Drug
Table 6: Percent Release of drug Under final chromatographic condition
45 85.94 0.32 82.95 0.62 65.68 0.26 77.29 0.21 74.09 0.13 78.45 0.14
60 98.98 0.10 87.28 0.10 75.91 0.10 83.21 0.19 88.86 0.22 91.47 0.18
Infinity 101.50 0.20 95.42 0.15 82.50 0.05 89.10 0.11 90.62 0.14 93.84 0.10
ASK
Dissolution Media Volume:900 mL Apparatus: USP-II
%Release at RPM
0.1 N HCl Phosphate buffer pH 6.8 Phosphate buffer pH 5.0
Time
points
50 75 50 75 50 75
Mean ±SD Mean ±SD Mean ±SD Mean ±SD Mean ±SD Mean ±SD
5 12.90 0.20 15.40 0.32 9.21 0.40 12.21 0.34 7.18 0.12 9.90 0.23
10 25.42 0.15 26.20 0.12 21.62 0.05 32.21 0.18 20.03 0.10 23.30 0.19
15 35.19 0.12 44.56 0.34 39.95 0.12 47.42 0.19 37.16 0.19 39.40 0.11
20 54.95 0.24 62.25 0.27 52.27 0.15 59.25 0.12 61.36 0.07 63.58 0.42
30 77.30 0.39 76.85 0.10 63.68 0.19 66.05. 0.22 75.92 0.23 78.90 0.24
45 86.04 0.32 83.48 0.29 72.18 0.32 75.07 0.31 78.05 0.17 80.09 0.32
60 99.98 0.15 88.37 0.09 80.65 0.14 82.15 0.15 81.59 0.21 82.55 0.14
Infinity 100.90 0.20 95.30 0.11 85.21 0.29 88.08 0.12 84.36 0.18 86.42 0.31
Drugs Dissolution media volume USP Appratus Agitation/Rotation(RPM)
Aliskiren 0.1N HCL 900 ml II 50
Time
Point
Retention
time
A.U.C
(mV)
%Drug
Release Asymmetry
Theoretical
Plates
5 3.890 33.85 12.07 1.132 7055
10 3.865 71.96 24.84 1.130 7045
15 3.875 93.79 33.50 1.129 7015
20 3.870 151.75 54.23 1.128 6995
30 3.871 213.85 76.65 1.129 6985
45 3.880 241.05 86.31 1.130 6980
60 3.879 278.12 99.39 1.131 6965
Infinity 3.873 281.60 100.90 1.130 6950
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2047
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Validation Parameters
The peak area of linearity solutions noted was plotted against the corresponding
concentrations to obtain the calibration graphs. The coefficient of correlation for Aliskiren
was found to be 0.9999.The observation and the result of precision study for drug is
summarized in the Table 7. The proposed method was found to be precise as repeatability of
measurements was determined as percent dissolution which should not be less than 75%
release at 45 minutes and %RSD should not be more than 5.0% for drug under analysis. The
% release was found to be above the specification and %RSD of drugs was found to be
0.2145 ascertaining the precision of method. The results of accuracy data at different spike
level are shown in table 8. From the accuracy studies % recovery of drugs at each accuracy
level was found to be in the range of 98.0%-101% which is found to be in the acceptance
range of 95%-105%. Standard solutions of Aliskiren and its formulation under study are
stable for the period of up to 48 hrs. The relative standard deviation for peak areas of three
replicate injection of mix standard solution under varied condition should not be more than
5.0%.Hence, proposed method was found to be robust.
Table 7: Result of Precision Study for Drugs
Table 8: Observation and Results of Recovery Studies
Spike
Level
Amt of pure
drug added
(mg)
AUC (mV)
Total Amt. of
Drug Estimated
(mg)
Amt
Recovered
%
Recovery
30% 17.80 147.970 41.92 17.46 98.08
50% 49.40 257.955 73.08 48.56 98.29
60% 64.87 315.940 89.51 65.11 100.37
75% 86.50 391.585 110.94 86.74 100.27
100% 124.90 530.960 150.43 125.68 100.94
125% 160.95 665.320 185.84 164.29 102.07
Mean 100.03
±SD 1.196
% RSD 1.195
S.NO AREA(mv) % Dissolution
1 281.58 100.37
2 280.16 99.85
3 280.83 100.09
4 280.94 99.99
5 281.39 100.29
Mean 100.116
%RSD 0.2145
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2048
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
CONCLUSION
The obtained results by the developed RP-HPLC method for Dissolution test of tablet
formulation containing Aliskiren was found to be precise, accurate and reliable. Hence the
proposed method can be adopted for routine dissolution analysis as well as Quality control
test of said drug in their formulation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am very much thank full to my guide and Principal, S.K.B. College of Pharmacy, Kamptee
for his guidance, kind help and constant encouragement at every step during the progress of
my work.
REFRENCES
1. Vaghela B, Kayastha R, Bhatt N, Pathak N, Rathod D. Development and validation of
analytical procedures. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 2011; 01(3): 50-56
2. Nissankararao S, Kallam V, Bhimavarapu R. (2013). Dissolution method development
and validation: A review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and
Development, 2013; 5(02): 06 –112.
3. Daugherty K, Aliskiren. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm, 2008; 65(14): 1323-32
4. Vaidyanathan S, Jarugula V, Dieterich H, Howard D, Dole W. Clin Pharmacokinet,
2008; 47(8): 515-31.
5. Sangoi MW, Secretti TL, Diefenbach FI. Development and validation of an uv
spectrophotometric method for the determination of aliskiren in tablet. Quim Nova, 2010;
33(6): 1330-1334.
6. Govindu RS, Nagaraju. VS, Rajan ST, Eshwaraiah SA, Kishore MA, Chakravarthy EI.
Stability indicating high performance liquid chromatographic method for the
quantification of aliskiren hemifumarate and its related substances. Der Pharma Chemica,
2014; 6(1): 290-298.
7. Raul KS, Kumar RB, Pattnaik KA, Rao NN. A RP-HPLC Method Development And
Validation For The Estimation Of Aliskiren Hemifumarate In Bulk And Pharmaceutical
Dosage Forms. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2012; 4(11): 4810-
4815.
8. Babu SK, Rao JVLNS, Bhargava KV. A Simple And Sensitive Method For The
Determination Of Aliskiren Hemifumarate Using Hplc-Uv Detection. Rasyan Journal
Chem, 2011; 4(2): 285-288.
www.wjpps.com Vol 4, Issue 10, 2015.
2049
Gupta et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
9. Prathyusha W, Tengli AR, Chandan RS, Gurupadayya BM, Thanuja SV. Development
and Validation of a Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation
of Aliskiren Hemifumarate, Amlodipine Besylate and Hydrochlorothiazide in Bulk and
Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, 2014; 9(1):
114-123.
10. Ezzeldin MI, Shokry E, Marwa A, Ramzia F, Elbagary. Application of Chromatographic
and Spectrophotometric Method for the Analysis of Aliskiren and Hydrochlorothiazide
antihypertensive combination. International Journal of Advanced Chemistry, 2013; 1(2):
13-20.
11. USP 32, The United States Pharmacopeia/The National Formulary, 32th ed.; United
States Pharmacopeial Convention: Rockville, 2009.
12. Luft FT., Weinberger MH. Antihypertensive therapy with aliskiren. Kidney Int, 2008;
73: 679-683.