Developing the Self-Calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index
description
Transcript of Developing the Self-Calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index
Developing the Self-Calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index
Is this computer science or climatology?
Steve Goddard
Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Outline
1. What is Drought? 1. What is Drought?
2. The PDSI 2. The PDSI
3. Self-Calibrating the PDSI 3. Self-Calibrating the PDSI
4. Summary4. Summary
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
What is Drought?
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
What is the PDSI?
• The PDSI is a drought index that models the moisture content in the soil using a supply and demand model.
• Is an accumulating index• Developed during the early
1960’s by W. C. Palmer, published in 1965.
• Designed to allow for comparisons over time and space.
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Where is it used?
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
How is it calculated?
Latitude Temperature Average Temp
Estimate Moisture Demand
Moisture Departure
Estimate Potential Evapotranspiration
Available Water Holding Capacity
Precipitation
Subtract
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
How is it calculated?
Moisture Departure
Weighting process
Weighted Combination
Moisture Anomaly Previous PDSI
Duration Factors
Climatic Characteristic
Current PDSI
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Problems with the PDSI
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
• Step 1: Supply Demand
More Detail on PDSI Calculations
P̂-P d =
.P as symbolized is whichlevel, moisture soil normal
a maintain to needed ionprecipitat the Calculate
ˆ
ion.precipitat actual the and
P between difference the is Departure Moisture The ˆ
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Moisture Departure: d
• The moisture departure represents the excess or shortage of moisture.
• The same value of d may have a different effect at different places, as well as at different times.– Examples:
• A shortage of 1” will matter more during the growing season than during winter.
• An excess of 1” will be more important in a desert region than in a region that historically receives several inches of rain each month.
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Step 2: Adjustment
• The moisture departure, d, is adjusted according to the climate and time of year to produce what is called the Moisture Anomaly, which is symbolized as Z.
• Z is the significance of d relative to the climate of the location and time of year.
• Z is calculated by multiplying d by K, which is called the Climatic Characteristic.
Kd Z ⋅=
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Climatic Characteristic: K
• K is calculated as follows:
i
jjj
i KKD
K ′′
=∑=
12
1
67.17
5.08.2
log5.1 10 +
⎥⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡ ++
++
⋅=′i
ii
iii
i DLPRORPE
K
where
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Step 3: Combine with Existing Trend
• The PDSI is calculated using the moisture anomaly as follows:
Zii ⋅+⋅=⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
− 31PDSI897.0PDSI 1
The values of 0.897 and 1/3 are empirical constants derived by Palmer, and are called the Duration Factors. They affect the sensitivity of the index to precipitation events.
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Self-Calibration
Improving the spatial and temporal resolution of the index requires automatic calibration of:
• Duration Factors
• Climatic Characteristic
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Duration Factors
• The Duration Factors are the values of 0.897 and 1/3 that are used to calculate the PDSI.
• They affect the sensitivity of the index to precipitation as well as the lack of precipitation.
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Duration Factors - from Palmer
Palmer calculated his duration factors by examining the relationship between the driest periods of time and the ΣZ over those periods.
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Duration Factors - from Palmer
The equation for this linear relationship is:
∑=
−−=t
tii tZ 764.10236.1
31
1244
897.01
==+
=⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛
+−
bm
bmm
Let b = -10.764 and m = -1.236.
Then the duration factors can be found as follows:
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Duration Factors - Wet and Dry
• Most locations respond differently to a deficiency of moisture and an excess of moisture.
• Calculate separate duration factors for wet and dry periods by repeating Palmer’s process and examining extremely wet periods.
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Duration Factors - Automated
Example from Madrid, NE
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Climatic Characteristic
• The climatic characteristic adjusts d so that it is comparable between different time periods and different locations.
• The resulting value is the Moisture Anomaly, or the Z-index.
• This process can be broken up into two steps.
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
The first step adjusts the moisture departure for comparisons between different time periods.
Climatic Characteristic - Step 1
5.08.2
log5.1 10 +
⎥⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡ ++
++
⋅=′i
ii
iii
i DLPRORPE
K
KdZ ′=′
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Climatic Characteristic - Step 2
The second step adjusts for comparisons between different regions.
Z
KD
Z
iii
′′
=∑=
12
1
67.17
locations.
different nine fromaverage the is 17.67 value The 12
1∑=
′i
iiKD
• Edwards Plateau, Texas• Southern Texas• Western Kansas• Texas High Plains
• Western Tennessee• West Central Ohio• Central Iowa• Scranton, Pennsylvania
• Northwestern North Dakota
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Climatic Characteristic - Redefinition
All of the problems with the Climatic Characteristic come from Step 2.
∑=
′12
1
67.17
iiiKD
What does this ratio really represent?
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
∑∑
′′KDKD
Observed Expected
∑∑
′′Kd
Kd
Average Observed
Average Expected
∑∑
′′Z
Z
Average Observed
Average Expected
Now what?
Climatic Characteristic - Redefinition
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Answer: use the relationship between the ∑Z and the PDSI
Climatic Characteristic - Redefinition
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
PDSI Average ObservedPDSI Average Expected
What is the “expected average” PDSI?
If there is one, it would be zero.
Now what?
Climatic Characteristic - Redefinition
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
• Besides zero, what other benchmarks does the PDSI have?
Answer: A user would expect “extreme” values to be extremely rare.
The only other benchmarks are the maximum and minimum of the range.
Climatic Characteristic - Redefinition
• From a user’s point of view, what are the expected characteristics of the PDSI?
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
• If extreme values are truly going to be considered extreme, they should occur at the same low frequency everywhere.
• What should this frequency be?– There should be one extreme drought per
generation.• Frequency of extreme droughts about 2%• 12 months of extreme drought every 50 years.
Climatic Characteristic - Redefinition
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
• Consider both extremely wet and dry periods:– To make the lowest 2% of the PDSI values
fall below -4.00, map the 2nd percentile to -4.00.
– To make the highest 2% of the PDSI values fall above +4.00, map the 98th percentile to +4.00.
Climatic Characteristic - Redefinition
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
⎪⎪
⎩
⎪⎪
⎨
⎧
≥⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛⋅′
<⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛⋅′
=
0 if(PDSI)percentile 98
4.00
0 if(PDSI)percentile 2
4.00-
th
nd
dK
dK
K
Climatic Characteristic - Final Redefinition
Wait a second…. Isn’t K used to calculate the PDSI?
How can the PDSI be used to calculate K?
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Calibration Technique
KdZ ′=′ using PDSI the Calculate 1.
PDSI. the of spercentile 98th and 2nd the using Calculate 2.
K
.K index with-Z the eRecalculat 3.
index.-Znew the using PDSI final the Calculate 4.
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Calibration Technique - Summary
– Dynamically calculate the duration factors, following Palmer’s method and adjusting for poor correlation and abnormal precipitation.
– Redefine the climatic characteristic to achieve a regular frequency of extremely wet and dry readings by mapping the 2nd percentile to -4.00 and the 98th to +4.00
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Calibration Technique
• Effects:– The index is now calibrated for both wet and
dry periods.– Almost all stations have about the same
frequency of extreme values.– The same basic algorithm can be used to
calculate a PDSI over multiple time periods.
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Multiple Time Periods
• Why?– To more easily correlate the PDSI with
another type of climate data such as tree rings, or satellite data.
• Valid monthly periods are divisors of 12:– Single month, 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 6-month.
• Valid weekly periods are divisors of 52:– Single week, 2-week, 4-week, 13-week, 26-week.
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Analysis
• How do we evaluate the Self-Calibrated PDSI?– Best way
Try to correlate the Self-Calibrated PDSI to actual conditions.
– Easy waySimply compare the Self-Calibrated PDSI to the original PDSI.
– Computer Science way:Write a few number-crunching scripts to do the work; performing any number of statistical examinations of the Self-Calibrated PDSI.
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Statistical Analysis
• What to look for in the statistical analysis.– Frequency of extreme values– Stations that are wet more often than dry and
vice versa. – Average range of PDSI values
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Statistical Analysis
Original Monthly
Self-Calibrating
Monthly
Self-Calibrating
Weekly
(max + min) > 1.0The maximum PDSI value was significantly higher than the minimum was low.
35.90% 16.03% 16.67%
(max + min) < -1.0 The minimum PDSI value was significantly lower than the maximum was high.
16.67% 1.92% 4.49%
The frequency with which extremely wet PDSI values (above 4.00) was between 1% and 3%
13.46% 91.03% 91.03%
The frequency with which extremely dry PDSI values (below -4.00) was between 1% and 3%
2.56% 87.82% 87.82%
Range was greater than 16 17.31% 0.00% 0.00%
Range was greater than 12 92.31% 1.92% 3.28%
Range was greater than 10 100.00% 52.56% 65.38%
Range was greater than 8 100.00% 99.36% 100.00%
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Spatial Analysis
Percent of time the PDSI and SC-PDSI are at or above 4.0
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Spatial Analysis
Percent of time the PDSI and SC-PDSI are at or below -4.0
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Conclusion
• The SC-PDSI is now used throughout the world.• Increased spatial and temporal resolution than
feasible with PDSI. • It is more spatially comparable than PDSI• Performs the way we believe Palmer meant his
drought index to perform, and the way he would have implemented it if computers were as readily available as they are today.• Well, that is what we tell the climatologist
anyway…
Oct. 26th, 2007 Computer Science & Engineering, UNL
Questions