Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

23
Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level NSF Workshop on Quantum Engineering Education Sophia Economou

Transcript of Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Page 1: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

NSF Workshop on Quantum Engineering Education

Sophia Economou

Page 2: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Questions to address

• Does quantum engineering require its own department, or is it better implemented as a specialized track in existing engineering disciplines?

• How can we build affordable hands-on quantum education at the undergraduate level?

• What courses should be included in a quantum engineering major or minor?

• How do we increase diversity in our quantum engineering students?

Page 3: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Does quantum engineering require its own department, or is it better implemented as a specialized track in existing engineering disciplines?

• Extremely diverse topic

• Very different types of expertise fit within QISE

A few examples• Superconducting QC; expertise:

• RF engineering, physics, QEC, q. algorithms expert, … • Quantum network science

• Theory of communication, classical networks, entanglement, cryptography, …, but also, implementations: emitters, devices, linear/nonlinear optics, transduction, …

• Sensing using color centers; expertise: • Engineering/nanophotonics, physics, materials science, …

Page 4: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

How can we build affordable hands-on quantum education at the undergraduate level?

• Leverage existing resources/programs

• Select future investments judiciously

• Shared facilities?

Page 5: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Expertise to acquire

• Field at very early stage à firm grasp of fundamentals is crucial

• E.g., specialized programming software of particular processors could become obsolete quickly

• Leverage tools provided by industry without narrowing focus too much; “low-level” knowledge still critical

• Domain expertise compliments quantum skills

Page 6: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Challenges

• Cost• Experimental setups expensive• For some experiments, demos can be purchased• For more complicated experiments (e.g., involving dilution

refrigerators) very difficult to include in a scaled up program• Shared facilities?

• Teaching staff

• Creating a meaningful curriculum given how broad the field is

Page 7: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Additional challenges at graduate level

• Masters level: short time, need to choose focus; each university should focus on leveraging faculty expertise

More in Bob Joynt’s talk

• PhD level: • Physics programs very rigid• Engineering departments probably lack critical mass of QISE faculty

• Leveraging existing interdepartmental resources/curriculum most likely the way to go

Page 8: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

QISE is one of the most interdisciplinary fields

Great opportunity and big challenge!

Page 9: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

The potential pitfalls of interdisciplinary programs

• Too restrictive

• Students have diverse backgrounds, strengths and weaknesses

• Prerequisite hell

Page 10: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Specialization is unavoidable and actually helpful!

• Not everyone can (or should) be taught everything

• Topics considered absolutely necessary by a typical physicist or engineer may not be in every student’s curriculum. E.g.:• QISE students may never solve the Schrödinger equation for continuous

problems and may never work on time-dependent problems• Some students may not touch any experiments• Some students will not take EM

• There are fundamentals to which everyone should have exposure

Page 11: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

• Multidisciplinary interest and expertise (7 depts involved)• Opportunity for an interdisciplinary program• Provide flexibility • avoid issues with prerequisites, etc• Students can tailor degree to their interests & background

• Absolutely necessary knowledge• Linear algebra• Programming & collaborative software• Quantum computing and quantum communications fundamentals

Virginia Tech approach-I

Page 12: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

• Mandatory courses• Linear algebra• Programming (classical and quantum computers)• Quantum computing and information concepts (freshman level)• Quantum information technologies—hardware agnostic (senior level)

• Electives set 1 (quasi-mandatory)• Out of short list of quantum-focused courses select at least one (hardware/software)

• Electives set 2• Long list of domain-specific courses (freshman-junior level), select at least one

• Electives set 3• Long list of domain-specific courses (mostly senior level), select at least one

• Optional project: choose among (i) academic research, (ii) industry/national lab internship, (iii) outreach*

*VT has multiple “5+ Club” awards for graduating five or more physics teachers in a given year

Virginia Tech approach-II

Page 13: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

• Build (unofficial) specializations (enforced via structure)

• Examples• Experimental/engineering (QM, solid state, lab courses)• Cryptography (classical and quantum crypto courses; no need for QM)• Chemistry (classical and quantum algorithms for chemistry, QM, many-body)• Machine learning/data analytics/QIS

• Can build a range of specializations: flexible but substantial

• Students will maintain contact with each other and build community through course involving collaborative projects

Virginia Tech approach-III

Page 14: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Freshman QISE course structure

• Applications/concepts-first approach: excite students, peak their interest, decouple concepts from mathematical framework

• Friendly pictorial approach (no advanced math required)

• But rigorous!

• Build toward linear algebra

• Use IMB Quatnum drag-and-drop interface (no coding experience required)

Page 15: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Qubits and gatesBlack: 1; White: 0

Single-(qu)bit gate: NOT (X) + +

+ + + +

Two-(qu)bit gate: NOT (X)

,

Superposition state (|+>):

Hadamard gate:

H H

, , -

, = , , ,- = =

, =, , ,

Rules

, = ,

Formalism from Terry Rudolph’s book “Q is for quantum”

Page 16: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Money or tiger? A quantum game

there are 3 possibilities

+

Tiger?open

? ?

+

Tiger?

H H

HH

Quantum computing allows us to determine if either door has a tiger in one try

• Analog of Deutsch’s algorithm• Allows students to see a

concrete example of something that can be done with quantum but not classical bits

Game invented by Ed Barnes, Virginia Tech

Economou, Rudolph, Barnes, arXiv:2005.07874

Page 17: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Concepts that will be taught with this approach (freshman level)

• Simple quantum algorithms

• Entangled vs separable states

• Quantum teleportation

• Non-cloning theorem

• Measurements in different bases

• QKD

• Entanglement swapping

• Quantum repeaters

• Quantum games, pseudo-telepathy, (non) contextuality, …

Page 18: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

From pictorial formalism to linear algebra

,

Motivate need for linear algebra instead of starting with it!E.g. superposition state |+>:

1,1 [1 1]1211

• Clouds à lists à vectors (+normalization)• Similarly for multi-qubit states• Shows tensor product structure naturally• Translate boxes to matrices: also natural, as linearity is already built into the rules

Page 19: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Summary of VT degree structure

• Early exposure to quantum concepts (friendly but rigorous)

• Very small set of courses that are mandatory across all students

• Restricted set of electives with structure (e.g., out of small sets of courses take at least 1, etc)

• Broader set of electives with more freedom to construct a degree that includes domain knowledge (and in case of QISE minor aligns with major)

Page 20: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

How do we increase diversity in our quantum engineering students?

• Resources available• Access to hardware and software• Online learning• Due to covid, lots of conferences, workshops virtual & talks posted online

• Potential issue with further imbalance based on gender and race

Page 21: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Toward a diverse QISE community

• Early outreach (K12, summer camps for HS students, transition programs )

• Target diverse/underrepresented groups

• QISE researchers should be careful with hype, aggressiveness, and competitive or esoteric language

Page 22: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Outreach in collaboration with engineering, VT

• VT Center for Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED)

• C-Tech2 program: 2 week STEM camp for 60 high school girls from all over US

• Barnes, Economou introduced a QISE module: 2-day event

• 1.5 hr lecture (all 60 students) followed by two 2 hr sessions (30 students each) of hands-on activities

• Lecture: background of QM and overview of quantum info technologies

pics from 20192020 was via Zoom (~65 students)2021 plans: virtual, expanded version (several days, additional instructors + student TAs)

Page 23: Developing Practical QISE Education at the Undergraduate Level

Our outreach/early QISE education program in a nutshell

• QM overview (lecture)

• QIST overview and formalism (hands on activity)

• IBM Q experience (hands on activity)

• A quantum game (hands on activity)

Economou, Rudolph, Barnes, arXiv:2005.07874 Support: