developing a typeface for people with dyslexia - Designing With
Transcript of developing a typeface for people with dyslexia - Designing With
Read:developing a typeface for people with dyslexia
Helen Hamlyn Research Associate: Natascha Frensch: RCA Communication, Art & Design
Research Partner: Audi Design FoundationOctober 2002 – 2003
i~design case studiesThis is one of a series of inclusive design case
studies published as part of the i~design research
programme. These case studies document inclusive
design collaborations between the Helen Hamlyn
Centre (HHC) and industry and voluntary sector
partners, under the Helen Hamlyn Research
Associates programme. They also document the
results of the DBA ‘Inclusive Design Challenge’, a
design competition co-ordinated by the Helen
Hamlyn Centre and the Design Business
Association (DBA).
i~design is a multi-centre collaborative research
programme funded by the Engineering and Physical
Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). The purpose
is to foster the adoption of inclusive design by
business decision makers and professional designers,
in particular by presenting the business case,
developing tools and techniques, and building
a network of researchers around the projects.
i~design partners• The Royal College of Art Helen Hamlyn Centre,
is a centre for inclusive design, with extensive
contacts in industry and the design professions.
• The Engineering Design Centre at the University
of Cambridge has a strong reputation in
the improvement of design process and
development of design methodologies
to address specific issues.
• Applied Computing at the University of Dundee
develops information technology systems to
support older and disabled people.
• The HCI Group at the University of York has
a long history of inter-disciplinary research
in the area of user centred design arising from
collaboration between the departments of
Psychology and Computer Science.
• The Design Council inspires and enables the
basic use of design by business, education
and government to improve prosperity and
well-being.
�© helen hamlyn centre 2003
AbstractThis study, supported by the Audi Design Foundation, formed the final year of a three-year
investigation into the relationship between dyslexia and typography. Frensch, who is herself
dyslexic, began it while studying for her MA in Communication Art and Design at the Royal
College of Art (RCA). There are two million severely dyslexic individuals in Britain. Much
has been done in the field of computer software, particularly for children, but relatively
little design research has been carried out in the area of type design. Frensch began by
experimenting with hand-drawn letterforms that were independent in character and could
be easily distinguished from each other by dyslexics. The project developed through a
programme of user research from which a new typeface emerged. This was then exhaustively
tested, amended and improved, leading to the introduction of ‘Read’, a family of three new
typefaces. This case study demonstrates how significant improvements in ease of reading
for dyslexics can result from relatively straightforward but carefully- researched typeface
enhancements. An accompanying limited edition book has been produced in English and
Dutch and a website (www.readregular.com) introduced to promote the typeface and explain
its development.
Keywords Dyslexia, typography, typefaces, reading difficulties, inclusive design.
Project periodOctober 2002 – October 2003
Read:developing a typeface for people with dyslexia
Overview Of the two million severely dyslexic [1] people in
Britain, some 375,000 are schoolchildren who
struggle with reading and writing. Similar patterns
of occurrence can be seen in Europe and North America.
Despite normal intellectual ability and largely
sympathetic teaching, the incidence is independent of
socio-economic or language background. Much help is
now available for dyslexics through the development
of software, talking books and encyclopaedias. The
study set out to discover whether these difficulties
might be combated by something as simple and
straightforward as improved typography and type
design. Frensch had already developed what was
thought to be a suitable typeface during her MA. The
initial objective of this study was to take her existing
typeface and develop a range of weights. Her
MA dissertation had played a major role in determining
the core message of her project whose major concerns
and qualities were characterised as follows:
• Individual
• Personal
• Determined
• Variety
• Difference
• Gaining confidence
• Saving preferences
Frensch’s personal experience of dyslexia helped
her to form an appreciation of the impact of the
condition on individuals and the efforts they made
to disguise and overcome their particular difficulties.
This set out the context for the project. Fairly early in
© helen hamlyn centre 2003�
Read | Natascha Frensch
the study, however, she began to realise the potential
significance of the benefits that could be gained by
developing a better understanding and appreciation
of the relationship between dyslexia and typography.
An outline research and development programme was
then devised which would allow her meaningfully to
explore these issues.
As is customary in the HHRC Research Associates
Programme, the one-year project was divided into
four stages:
Stage �: Explore (October – December)
Stage �: Focus (January – March)
Stage 3: Develop (April – June)
Stage 4: Deliver (July – September)
MethodsThe ‘explore’ stage began by researching dyslexia in
greater detail [2] and in particular the major reasons
why reading and writing difficulties occur. Dyslexia
causes difficulty with the left side of the brain, the
area that is responsible for language processing. The
cerebellum is the small brain part, which is thought to
provide ‘automatic reading’ or language dexterity for
non-dyslexics. For dyslexics the cerebellum experiences
difficulty in functioning smoothly and this translates
into delays and uncertainties, which can interrupt the
visual demand of reading [3]. There may therefore
be a problem of translating the shapes of characters
and assembling the sound into a word, all of which
can lead to the necessity to re-read any given word or
passage. This delays and interferes with the normal
reading process. Similar problems manifest themselves
during writing, but the process is reversed and these
specialised difficulties did not need to be taken into
account in this study. Dyslexic children have trouble
learning the shapes of individual characters when
they are learning how to read, especially with charac-
ters that look similar [4].
A network of some 100 dyslexic contacts, who
would take part in the proposed user research was
then set up in conjunction with RCA Dyslexia Coor-
dinator, Qona Rankin. Frensch’s dyslexia gave her a
head start in comparing and evaluating alternative
proposals and design solutions. The user groups were
divided into order by age: young children who were
just getting familiar with reading and writing; older
schoolchildren, and adults aged between 18 and 70.
Students and adults were grouped together as the
process of learning and understanding is by then
largely complete. Thus the first and second age groups
lay quite close together in age. Much of the research
work centred on a comparison of various formats of
the ‘Read’ typeface with other typefaces (Figure 2)
having broadly similar characteristics. The user tests
were made up of a mixture of one-to-one interviews,
questionnaires and handouts. Six typographers and
type designers were consulted including two Dutch
experts - Robin Kinross, Miles Newlyn, Rosemary Sas-
soonm Adrian Williams, Gerard Under and Just van
Rossum. These consultations took place in November/
December 2002, February 2003 and July/August 2003,
and specialist conferences were attended including a
3-day ‘Typo Berlin’ conference in Berlin [6]
Figure 2. Comparison with other typefaces
Figure 1. Read Space
4
Results and Design OutcomesDuring all stages of the project it became clear that
no two dyslexics came up with the same answers. This
made testing more difficult than anticipated. However
it was possible to categorise their responses, which
could then be fed into the design process. Individual
comments were still taken into consideration to see if
there could be a general way of incorporating those
suggestions. It was found that the older age group
were more open and responsive to the user test work
and had more specific reasons for liking or disliking
particular proposals. In general, dyslexics can be said
to have a pronounced ability to make decisions and
therefore held strong preferential opinions. Some
typefaces were found to be more difficult than others
for dyslexics, with variations in form, complexity and
distinctness having negative effects (eg. Rockwell,
Ariel Black and Courier). This was unsurprising as
it had been established that dyslexics spend two
to three times as much time taking in, acquiring,
processing, storing and reproducing information.
Research revealed the effect of the rest of the
word on the nature of the first letter for a dyslexic.
‘Normal’ readers are able automatically to read
ahead a few words without being aware of this
which speeds up the reading process. Dyslexics can
experience difficulty with peripheral vision in this
context, which causes distortion leading to fatigue,
headaches and eyestrain. These factors led to the
design principle of creating an individual approach
for each of the characters, thereby questioning the
traditional typeface design philosophy of searching
for consistency and an overall look while integrating
differences purely for reasons of style.
The outcome of her research led Frensch to question
these contemporary boundaries of difference and
consistency in the context of finding overall optical
pleasure. This led her to depart from some of the
more traditional letter forms such as the normal ‘a’
which is seen as ‘two storey’ (rather like a number
8) and therefore disruptive, and ‘g’ which dyslexics
sometimes see as ‘two-eyed’ (spectacles turned
through 90°).
© helen hamlyn centre 2002
Read | Natascha Frensch
Figure 4. Double page spread from Read Regular
�© helen hamlyn centre 2003
Read | Natascha Frensch
AssessmentFairly early in the study, Frensch began to realise how
a typeface designed by a dyslexic for other dyslexics
could assist them and increase their motivation to
read. A decision was made to concentrate on a ‘sans
serif’ format to ensure the objective of reducing form
and detail, with the inner forms of the letters kept
large and open to prevent them from ‘bleeding’ out
to become a closed rather than an open form. The use
of serifs also tended to interfere with optimised letter
spacing. The issue of problems relating to reversing
and inverting similar letterforms was resolved as
can be seen in Figure 4. Great emphasis was placed
on the importance of not mirroring characters and
not producing mirrored and inverted versions of the
same letterform (rotated around a diagonal axis). A
further objective was therefore to create maximum
differential between those individual characters that
can create confusion, such as ‘b-d-p-q’, ‘f-t’ and ‘m-
n-r’. It was important to be able to produce a well-
resolved typeface together with the tools to promote
that result.
DiscussionThe user research outputs confirmed that ascenders
(the upward strokes in letters such as ‘d’) and
descenders (downwards strokes in letters such as
‘p’) should ideally be long to ensure their legibility.
This, together with other factors, led Frensch to
optimise respective character weighting as one of the
key drivers of the project, with the weight of each
character being carefully balanced to decrease the
competition for the reader’s attention between the
letterforms and the background (Figure 6). It was
found that many of the issues relating to characters
also applied to numerals, which were incorporated
using similar criteria (Figure 7).
Character spacing was increased slightly to
support the reader during their attempt to build
up the necessary word images, and verified by means
of further user testing. It was found that the standard
answer to problems experienced by dyslexics of simply
enlarging type sizes did not adequately address the
issue, in fact it tended to emphasise the problem
with dyslexics. Needing to be able to recognise
individual letter images rather than the shape of the
completed word form, particularly when the spelling
is not phonetic (eg. ‘Peugeot’), can and often does
lead to guesswork. Other recommendations
regarding issues such as paper colour, finish, line
length, justification and alignment are summarised
in Table 1.
Figure 4. Comparison of similar letterforms Figure 5. Similar letterforms are differentiated
Read | Natascha Frensch
Figure 6. The weight of each letter is carefully balanced
© helen hamlyn centre 2003�
Figure 7. Numbers and characters
Figure 8. Read Smallcaps, Read Regular, Read Space and examples of different sizes and tones
© helen hamlyn centre 2003�
Read | Natascha Frensch
Table1. Recommendations for ease of reading by dyslexics
Attribute
Fonts
Size
Leading
Numbers
Contrast
Layout
Reccomendation
Alternatives to the ‘Read regular’ family, ie Read regular, Read Smallcaps and Read
Space are acceptable providing they adhere to similar design guidelines. Copying or
mirroring shapes should be avoided to avoid the ‘swirl-effect’ (Figure 10). Avoid the
over-stylised. Italics and underlining are less recognisable. The use of capitals for large
amounts of text is not recommended
The printing in the ‘Read regular’ publication uses 9pt set on 13.5pt leading and
12pt set on 17pt leadingt
+ 4pt on the typesize gives enough space. For Microsoft systems 1.5 or double spacing
gives sufficient but not too much free space
Distinctive numbers are essential to avoid confusion which can occur with 3-5-8
and 6-9 series
This needs to be considered to ensure the right balance between the type, weight and
background to avoid the wash-out effect. Off-white and non-shiny paper colour and
finishes [5] are preferred (Figure 11)
An ideal maximum line length is 10 words. Sentences should not be too short other
than in the case of narrow columns. Left alignment is preferred or central for headings,
but not right aligned. Justified text interrupts word spacing and creates
non-consistency and ‘river-effect’ distortion. Hyphenation should also be avoided as
it creates difficulties in comprehension (Figure 12)
Figure 9. Text examples
Figure12. River-effect
Figure 11. Wash-out effect
Figure 10. Swirl-effect
�
Read | Natascha Frensch
Conclusions and future workThe main conclusions are as follows:
• A better awareness of the relationship between
typography and dyslexia needs to be encouraged;
• A fresh approach to typography in a form that
tends to include its easy assimilation by dyslexics
can extend the scope and coverage of the printed
matter. Dyslexia runs in families and many readers
can be dyslexic without knowing it. Thus all those
involved in the creation and reproduction of
typefaces should take these factors into account;
‘Read regular’ is therefore an inclusive typeface
which provides a better reading experience for all
• The important guidelines to emerge from the
study covered type size, line spacing, use of capitals,
paper colour and finish, alignment, justification and
hyphenation. They are addressed in the associated
publication ‘Read regular’ which should form an
important reference base for typographers. Their
use and adoption should be encouraged wherever
possible.
Frensch has created her own ‘Read’ website (www.
readregular.com) to accompany her publication
to promote the typeface to a wider educational
audience. She has also come to an agreement with
a number of publishing houses, who wish to use her
typeface in the production of a series of childrens’
books one of which has already been published: My
Friend has Dyslexia, published by Chrysalis books,
2004.
Bibliography[1] “Dys” (Greek) ‘Difficulty with’.
Lexis ‘Language’, ‘Speech’.
[2] Leij, van der, Prof SA, University of Amsterdam
“Dyslexia is defined as dysfunctioning that is
identified by serious problems in automating
word identification (reading) and/or written image
building (spelling)”, Dutch television documentary
[3] Miles, T.R, 1986, Understanding Dyslexia (paper-
back)
[4] Hofmeester, N, 2002, Studeren met dyslexie, Ant-
werpen-Apeldoorn
[5] Irlen, H, 1991, Reading by the colors (paperback),
pub. Penguin Group, New York
[6] www.typo-berlin.de
© helen hamlyn centre 2003
About the research partners Audi Design Foundation: launched in August 1997,
the aim of the Audi Design Foundation is to help
young people with innovative ideas realise their
inventions. The Audi Design Foundation has awarded
more than 100 grants totalling over £50,000. An Audi
Design Foundation grant can be for as little as £500
to over £20,000.
www.audifoundation.org
About the Research AssociateDutch. MA(RCA) Communication,
Art & Design 2002; BA Willem de
Kooning Academy, Graphic Design,
Rotterdam 2000. Work experi-
ence: Venture 3; RCA; Westminis-
ter University; Ecoscoop, Tom v/d
Haspel, Rotterdam; Via Vermeulen,
Rotterdam; Platvorm, architecture
magazine / collaboration, Rotterdam. Awards: Winner,
Best Verzorgde Boeken, Why Me Lord (Via Vermeulen,
2000); 2002 Winner, Deutsche Bank, Pyramid Award
for Design; 2002 Winner, Design for our Future Selves
competition.
Contact: [email protected]
The Helen Hamlyn Centre was set up at the Royal
College of Art in January 1999 to alert design and
business to the far-reaching implications of a
rapidly changing society. It works to advance a socially
inclusive approach to design through practical research
and projects with industry. Its Research Associates
Programme teams new RCA graduates with industry
partners.
www.hhc.rca.ac.uk
The Helen Hamlyn Centre
Royal College of ArtKensington Gore London SW7 2EU
T +44 (0)20 7590 4242 F +44 (0)20 7590 4244