Developing a National Qualifications Framework The Namibian Experience………. - Franz E. Gertze...
-
Upload
jessie-charles -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Developing a National Qualifications Framework The Namibian Experience………. - Franz E. Gertze...
Developing a National Qualifications Framework
The Namibian Experience………. -
Franz E. GertzeDirector
LuandaANGOLA
29 January 2008
Overview of the presentation
Introduction Context of the the Education and Training System
– History
– Globalisation
– Economic demands
– Expectations by the world of work
– Globalisation
– The current situation
Overview of the presentation
NQF Standards Setting Beneficiaries Conclusion
Standards Assessment
Portability
NQFNQFRecognitionArticulation
Unit Standards
Qualification
CapabilitiesSkills
Competencies
Is the recognition of
is the recognition of
Is built up of
Is built up of
Education and Training in Namibia
Historical Perspective
Apartheid and Colonialism
Inequities to access
Emphasis on formal education and training
Uneven quality of education and training
Education and Training in Namibia
Expectations by the World of Work
Demand driven Competency based outlook Requires labour market mobility Developed inertia to re-training of graduates Flexible and Multi-skilled workforce needed New approach to education and training warranted
Education and Training in Namibia
Economical Demands
Globalisation
Changes in the world economy
Global competitiveness the order
International Trade Agreements (WTO, NAFTA, EU,
MERCUSUR, SADC)
Investment in Human Capital is imperative
Education and Training in Namibia
Socio-Political and Demographic DynamicsDifferent Education levels
High levels of Unemployment
Skewed Age distribution
Income disparities
Employment equity and Affirmative Action
Impact of HIV and AIDS
Education and Training in Namibia
Globalisation Free movement of goods and services including education and
training Affects decisions that have to be made Education and training responded by:
– Differentiation– Privatisation– Consumerism– CBET– Internationalisation– Massification– Review of Quality
Education and Training in Namibia
The Status Quo Two Ministries for Education Towards Education for All
Access, Equity, Quality, Democracy and LLL Funding = 25% of National Budget Strategic Alignment to: Vision 2030, NDPII World Bank Study: Human Capital Dev. And
Knowledge mgt ETSIP
Education and Training in Namibia
Other Challenges
Too many role players (NCHE, NEAC, NTA…..) No nationally agreed nomenclature for qualifications No validation for courses developed, delivered and
certified No source of public information on recognised
qualifications No structured involvement of stakeholders E-learning Mushrooming of providers
NQA Mandate
The Objects of the NQA are to:-a. Set up and administer a NQF;
b. Be a forum for matters pertaining to quals;
c. set up occupational standards for any occupation or position in any career structure
d. Set the curriculum standards required for achieving the occupational standards;
e. Promote the development of, and to analyse benchmarks of acceptable performance norms for any occupation, job or position;
NQA Mandate
f. Accredit persons, institutions and organisation providing education and courses of instruction or training of meeting certain requirements;
g. Evaluate and recognise (certify) competencies learnt outside formal education;
h. Establish facilities for the collection and dissemination of information wrt qualifications;
i. Enquire whether qualifications meet national standards;
j. Advise on matters pertaining to qualifications.
NQA Accountability
A body established by the Namibia Qualifications Authority Act ( Act 29 of 1996)
Governed by a Council of 36 members from key stakeholder areas
Serviced by a Secretariat
Advise Minister on matters pertaining to quals
The National Qualifications Framework
Principles of the NQF
* Relevance * Integration
* Credibility * Coherence
* Flexibility * Standards
* Access * Legitimacy
* Life long Learning * Portability
* Articulation and Progression
THE NQF
A national system for organising qualifications in a way that makes qualifications easy to understand and compare.
A register of all relevant, legal and quality assured qualifications.
System that gives consistency and clarity to the way qualifications are expressed.
The NQF
Make-up of the NQF
The NQF has three distinct types of ‘awards’:1. ‘Portal’ or whole qualifications - components of a qualification are
not separately registered on the NQF
2. Credit-accumulation qualificationsThe components of a qualification are separately registered on the NQF and can be separately awarded. Once specified components have been accumulated, the qualification may be issued.
3. Registered qualification components – unit standardsThe separately registered components that can be used to meet the requirements of credit-accumulation qualifications
The NQF is based on outcomes – what people
know and can do after learning.
Ability is more than time spent learning.
The NQF LevelsThe NQF reflects TEN levels of qualification complexity, each level described by a series of descriptor statements that reflect this complexity (not years of study)
The NQF Levels are descriptive and not prescriptive- qualifications (and courses) may not cover everything described for a particular Level – but must be clearly aligned with a Level
The NQF Levels are cumulative
The descriptor statements provide a broad framework from which specific and contextualised outcomes of learning may be derived
The NQF Levels
Cognitive ability – and context
Technical/scholastic skills – in context
Responsibility for actions
Accountability for own and others actions
NQF Level Descriptors10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Creation ofnew knowledge
through scholarship
andresearch
Recall of narrow rangeof existing knowledge
Analysis and application of
focussed specialistand theoretical
knowledge
Application of knowledge and skillsin and to
familiar situations
Application of existing knowledge
and skills to create or expand,
often in completely abstract situations
Application invariable routine or
non-standard, non routinesituations
OftenInnovative solutions
Self initiatedand directed
Closely supervised
“Loose” guidance
Responsible for managing
others
Accountablefor self
and others
Others are accountable for actions
and outputs
Qualifications of the NQF
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CERTIFICATES
DIPLOMAS
Bachelor Degree
Bachelor Honours
Masters Degree
Doctoral Degree
Professional Bachelor
Differentiating Qualification Types
Degrees require minimums of 720 hours of learningeffort associated with learning outcomes/abilitiesat or above NQF Level 7
– in some cases, all effort must be at the level the degree is registered.
Honours and Prof Bachelor require at least 1200hours at Level 8 complexity
Masters requires at least 2400 hours at Level 9 complexityand requires considerable evidence through research result
Standards Setting
CurriculumDevelopment
Accreditation
NQA NTA/NHEC NQA NTA PROVIDERS NQA/NHEC NQA NEACB/PROVIDERS NHEC/NEACB NEACB/NTA/PROVIDERS
RegistrationAnd
Licensing EducationTraining
AndSkills Development
Assessment
Moderation
Certification
Recognition and
ValidationNational Qualifications Framework
Unit standards
Components of qualifications, each representing a significant
available to be formally awarded
Their award can be certificated and/or listed
Separately registered on the NQF to make them
separately from the qualification
on the Record of Learning for that recipient
outcome of learning or workplace competency
The NQF and Unit Standards
Responsibility of industry or profession Developing unit standards is an activity that
sits firmly as a responsibility of the industry or profession that requires national benchmarks for certification. The NQA is able to assist through the provision of technical advice and guidance – but it does not have the subject matter expertise to set national standards on behalf of different sectors.
Anatomy of National Standards
National standards, what are they?– National standards are nationally applied statements
of knowledge, skills, attitudes, values and special attributes required and combined through underlying understanding to carry out the roles or sets of tasks in a particular occupation and the criterion to be used to determine the achievement at a specified minimum level of performance.
Policy on the the Setting of Standards for qualifications in Namibia
Anatomy of Standards (cont)
What is a standard?
“….a measure, devised by general consent, as a basis for comparison against against which judgements might be made as to the levels of acceptability….”
Anatomy of standards (cont)
Steps in Setting Standards Standards are set by a National Standards Setting
Body normally appointed by the NQA Council and in concurrence with the Ministers of Education
Six critical interest groups are represented on each NSSB
SGB’s provide expertise Techniques Employable in Stds Setting
Anatomy of standards (cont)
Critical interest groups are– Employers
– Employees
– Education and Training Providers
– Professional Bodies
– Lobby Groups
– NQA
– Government Representatives
Anatomy of Standards
Uses of Standards
Human Resource Interventions Performance Management Systems (PMS) Training Curriculum Development – CBET Assessment / Moderation Labour Market Efficiency Accreditation Validation
Scope for the use of Standards
.
Facilities and Infrastructure
Facilities and Infrastructure
Curriculum DevelopmentCurriculum
Development
Teacher EducationTeacher
Education
Teaching andLearning
Teaching andLearning
AssessmentAssessment
Quality AssuranceQuality Assurance
AccreditationAccreditation
Schools ImprovementProgramme
Schools ImprovementProgramme
Scope for the use of Standards
Provider Accreditation
Course/ProgrammeAccreditation
AccreditationAccreditation
•Teaching Learning ModelPhilosophy, Techniques, Resources,Transfer Promotion, articulation…
•Purpose•RPL•Selection, Orientation•Assessment and Moderation•Certification
•Bus. Structure•Financial viability•Staffing and development•Ethical stds.•Access and Equity•Assessment•Physical Resources•Admin and student records•etc
Scope for the use of Standards
Teacher Education
Who benefits from the NQF
Learners
Access for everyone to learning Learning pathways and opportunities for progression for
the previously disadvantaged
Learners develop to their full potential
Quality assured learning
National records of learners achievement*
Who benefits from the NQF
Namibia Means to transform education and training in Namibia -
advances a culture of lifelong learning and a single NQF Provides information for planning for socio-economic
development - ensures Namibia a world class learning system, building block in HRD strategy
The Nation A proud and confident nation able to stay abreast of
change (See the vision statement)
Challenges faced
Interpretations and Perceptions– Definitions for Higher/Tertiary education and training
– Meanings of accreditation / evaluation / audit / assessment / recognition / registration
Elitism and Disengagement– Institutions claim autonomy and academic freedom and
become insular from national HRD programmes
– Leads to disengagement from QA arrangements
Challenges
Uneven capacity and incongruent development
– Quality implementation requires interaction of strategic partners e.g. NQA, NTA, NCHE, MoE.
– Responsiveness to NQA requirements by the institutions
Conflicting priorities– Challenge between quantity and quality
– Funding of Research or Technical training or basic education
Challenges faced
Commercialization and Competition– Results in over-duplication of “soft
programmes”– Cooperation and collaboration is compromised– Competition for funding
Policy formulation – Different interpretation about the scope
Message
Quality is never an accident, it is the product of attitude, intention, skill and effort!
THANK YOU.
Definitions for quality
Numerous definitions by quality Gurus
A. Feienbaum
“An effective system for integrating the quality development, management and improvement efforts of the
various groups in an organisation so as to enable production and service (through put) at the most economical levels which allow for full customer
satisfaction”
K. Ishikawa “Optimisation of product design”
Definitions for quality
W.E. Demming J.M. Juram: “Fitness of use” P.B. Crosby “conformance to requirements
“Prevention not appraisal”
Definitions for quality
Prof. David Garvin: Categorised definitions into five approaches
Transcendent approach Innate excellence Rolex, Virgin Airlines, MB,
Manufacturing based Free of errors
User-based Fit for purposes
Product-based Measurable set of characteristics
Value based approach Cost and price
Why make Quality a Priority?
Who needs quality in Education and Training, is it
Learners Providers Employers Governments NQA Employers ………….?
CommunityOthersNQAEmployersGovernmentsProvidersLearner
International Developments
EuropeSorbonne and Bologna Declarations
“The vitality and efficiency of any civilization is measured in the fact by the attraction that its cultural system exerts on other countries. We must ensure that the European system of education acquires in the world a degree of attraction equal to our extraordinary cultural and scientific traditions.”
Bologna Declaration, p.2.
Southern African Development Community
SADCQF
Rationale and Background
2. Historical legacy of members states
All members states are former colonies and are at varying levels of development
Southern African Development Community
SADCQF
Rationale and Background
3. Diverse Education and Training Systems
4. Globalization and Competitiveness
5. Efforts to enhance cooperation and Unification
6. Development of National Qualification Frameworks in member states
Southern African Development Community
SADCQF
Beneficiaries of the SADCQF Member States and the region as a whole National education and training systems and
institutions Students and the society at large Employers The global community
Southern African Development Community
SADCQFBenefits of the SADCQF
Promotion of dialogue and mutual understanding Creation of a wider pool of knowledge, skills,
values and experience in the region Increased access to skilled and knowledgeable
personnel Greater flexibility and mobility of learner and
workers Easy and fair determination of qualification
equivalencies and credit transfers Regulation of cross-border provisioning Streamlining and rationalization of resource
allocation
Southern African Development Community
SADCQFDesign Features
Standardized terminology Eight to Ten levels Credit based Common standards and Procedures Regional database Common quality assurance criteria and procedure
.
Our destiny (destination) is in our hands
RecognizedEFA
Mechanisms for the Recognition of Life Skills
THANK YOU!
Key Learning
Quality assurance SOLVE many problems relating to:
Articulation Credit transfer Comparability (public/Private, local/global) Funding Justice Relevance Transparency
Conclusion
The NQF as a social construct must be– Based on Democratic participation– Sustainably resourced– Subjected to intellectual scrutiny
The NQF is a tested and proven means to meaningful Human Capital Development
Provide data for Human Resources planning nationally