DEVELOPING A MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK … · training support, psychosocial support and...
Transcript of DEVELOPING A MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK … · training support, psychosocial support and...
DEVELOPING A MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR
IMPLEMENTING OPERATION CHILD SUPPORT ACTIVITIES AT REACH OUT
MBUYA PARISH HIV/AIDS INITIATIVES
FELLOW: MASABA DAVID WANALOBI BA (ARTS)
MA. DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
January 2010
ii
Table of Contents
Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... ii List of figures ................................................................................................................................ iv
Figure 1: ROM Organization Hierarchy ................................................................................... iv Figure 2: Conceptual framework ............................................................................................... iv Figure 3: OVC Support module ................................................................................................. iv Figure 4 Process of developing the module ............................................................................... iv Figure 5 supported children’s unique identification numbers .................................................... iv
Declaration..................................................................................................................................... v Declaration..................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ vi List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 Introduction and Background ............................................................................................... 1
1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ........................................................................................................................... 2
Reach Out Mbuya .................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Literature review .................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 M&E framework ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Why M&E ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Constraints ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Human resource capacity ...................................................................................................... 5 2.5 Tools, data storage and use ................................................................................................... 5
3.0 Statement of the problem, justification, conceptual framework ........................................ 6 3.1 Statement of the problem ...................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Justification ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Conceptual framework for developing an M&E framework ................................................ 6
4.0 Project objectives .................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 General objective ................................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Specific objectives ................................................................................................................. 8
5.0 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 8 5.1 Project implementation .......................................................................................................... 9
5.1.1 Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation framework ........................................................ 9 5.1.2 Developing and selecting suitable performance indicators .............................................. 11 5.1.3 Reviewing existing data collection tools .......................................................................... 11 5.1.4 Training staff in the implementation of the framework ................................................... 12 5.1.5 Developing an electronic Relational Database ................................................................. 12
6.0 Ethical considerations ........................................................................................................... 14 7.0 Dissemination ........................................................................................................................ 14
iii
8.0 Sustainability of the project ................................................................................................. 14 References .................................................................................................................................... 15 Appendix I ................................................................................................................................... 17 Appendix II .................................................................................................................................. 24
iv
List of figures
Figure 1: ROM Organization Hierarchy
Figure 2: Conceptual framework
Figure 3: OVC Support module
Figure 4 Process of developing the module
Figure 5 supported children’s unique identification numbers
v
Declaration
I Masaba David Wanalobi do hereby declare that this programmatic report titled DEVELOPING A
MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTING OPERATION
CHILD SUPPORT ACTIVITIES AT REACH OUT MBUYA PARISH HIV/AIDS
INITIATIVES has been prepared and submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the MUSPH-CDC
HIV/AIDS Fellowship Program and has not been submitted for any academic qualification.
Signed ……………………………………………. Date……………………………….. Masaba David Wanalobi, Fellow Signed………………………………………….. …Date ………………………………… Dr. Alamo Stella-Talisuna Host Mentor Signed………………………………………….. Date ……………………………….. Dr. John Ssempebwa Academic mentor
vi
Acknowledgments
I acknowledge the support provided to me by my mentors: Dr. Alamo Stella-Talisuna, Mr.
Ssebyatika Elly, Mr. Wamara Moses and Dr. John Ssempebwa (academic mentor) for the
guidance and technical support provided to me while preparing this proposal.
I am indebted to the Fellowship programme office for the support visits.
Special thanks to all Operation Child Support (OCS) team for supporting me in activities at the
host institution.
Special regards to all the ROM staff for the support they rendered to me.
And my fellow Fellows for the constant support they render to me.
vii
List of Acronyms
AIDS Acquired Immune-Deficiency Syndrome
FBO Faith Based Organization
HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus
M&E Monitoring and Evaluation
NSP National Strategic Plan for HIV/AIDS activities in Uganda
OCS Operation Child Support
OSF Operation School Fees
OVC Orphans and Vulnerable Children
PHA People Living With HIV/AIDS
PMMP Performance Measurement and Management Plan
ROM Reach Out Mbuya
Ss Social Support
TWG Technical Working Group
UAC Uganda AIDS Commission
UNAIDS The Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS
WHO World Health Organization
viii
Executive Summary To date Reach Out Mbuya (ROM) is supporting over 1,000 OVC, through its OVC project
Known as Operations Child Support (OCS). The OCS project provides education and vocational
training support, psychosocial support and Child Protection. There is an M&E department at
ROM whose main role is to design and implement the M&E strategy involving: guiding strategic
planning, articulation of the information needs and data collection system, report writing,
monitoring and evaluating programme progress in all departments and ensuring continuous
quality improvement.
Although ROM has an M&E system with most of its components functional, a situational
analysis conducted in April 2009 as part of the Fellowship project showed some need for
improvement Some of the challenges found were attributed to the sudden increase in the number
of OVC supported and activities involved in. Among the gaps identified were difficulties of
collecting accurate data on the actual number of OVC supported, M&E functions were not
integrated into the OVC program, there was limited involvement and appreciation of the
significance of M&E by the OVC project implementers(Staff), indicators that existed lacked
Means of Verification (MOV), there was limited documentation of goals and objectives and lack
of a uniform understanding of the problem that the OVC project was addressing and the
strategies being used to address the problem . All these factors affected the effectiveness of the
decision making process, decisions were often based on haphazardly collected field
information. Therefore this project was undertaken to create a common frame work that will
ensure guided comprehensive data collection, supportive trucking of project progress,
compliance to set standards, efficiency and stakeholders involvement in M&E for enhanced
program performance and organizational learning.
The methodology and approach used in the implementation of this project were participatory and
phased as it entailed wide consultation at all stages. Project meetings, discussions and mini-
workshops were held involving the Executive Director, senior managers, team leaders and OCS
staff members. These consultations were aimed at enhancing ownership that would in effect
bring effective accountability at the stage of implementation. The first phase focused on
ix
developing an M&E framework that clearly defines goals and objectives of OCS interventions in
order to structure the M&E process. A log frame was developed, indicators identified,
assumptions and means of verification defined. A project Monitoring and Evaluation Plan was
developed based on the critical M&E questions in planning of (what, why, when, for whom, who
and how).
Following the project implementation the Fellow learnt that stakeholders, especially program
implementers must be involved in M&E management for they uphold the functioning of the
M&E system. For organizational effectiveness and efficiency the M&E functions should be
integrated into all relevant program areas and the M&E unit oversees the entire M&E system of
the organization and it is important to clearly define how the M&E system operates
1
1.0 Introduction and Background
1.1 Introduction In Uganda, the number of children under age 18 who have lost one or both parents stands at 2.3
million of which approximately 46% are due to HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS, UNICEF & USAID,
2004). Many more children live with one or more chronically ill parents.
Children who have lost one or both parents to HIV face challenges in their long-term health. In
addition to having an increased risk of illness or injury, orphaned and vulnerable children (OVC)
often receive inadequate food or shelter, may live with caregivers that ignore, exploit, or abuse
them, and have to cope with the trauma of seeing their parents get sick and die (USAID, 2007).
Despite recognition of the magnitude and negative consequences of this problem, there is little
evidence on “what works and what does not work” to improve the well-being of children
affected by HIV/AIDS. Given the lack of information on the impact of care and support
strategies for OVC, there is an urgent need to learn more about how to improve the effectiveness,
quality, and reach of these efforts. (USAID, 2007)
In an attempt to fill these knowledge gaps, the government of Uganda in partnership with other
stakeholders developed a country-level monitoring and evaluation system, with the formulation
of the National Performance Measurement and Management Plan (PMMP). This replaced the
National M&E framework which was ridden with short-comings (UAC, 2007).
The PMMP for the National Strategic Plan (NSP) for HIV/AIDS activities 2007/08 to 2011/12 is
a major step in ensuring that there is one country-level monitoring and evaluation system. The
PMMP outlines how the Government of Uganda plans to track the performance of the NSP.
The goal of the PMMP is to ensure collection and reporting of all national level HIV/AIDS
indicators. The purpose of the PMMP is to guide coordinated and efficient collection,
collation, analysis, interpretation and dissemination of information for HIV/AIDS
programs. This PMMP is designed to serve as a guide for baseline and subsequent annual
reports on national and district indicators for HIV/AIDS in Uganda.
2
Monitoring will be carried out through sector management information systems and
evaluations will include the Uganda Demographic and Health Survey, AIDS Indicator
Survey, Antenatal clinic sentinel surveillance, Most-At-Risk-Population Surveys, cohort
analyze of patients on ARVs as well as longitudinal studies for determination of HIV
incidence.
There are 53 national level indicators in the National HIV/AIDS PMMP. Of these, there are
4 OVC support indicators (indicators Nos. 39, 40, 41 and 43) and these are: percentage of
OVC whose households received emotional support in the past 12 months, percentage of
disadvantaged groups that have received vocational training the last 12 months, ratio of
current school attendance among orphans to that among non-orphans aged 6-14 in the past
year and percentage of OVC whose households received free basic external support in
caring for the children in the last 12 months (UAC, 2007).
1.2 Background
Reach Out Mbuya
Reach Out Mbuya (ROM) parish HIV/AIDS Initiatives is a faith based non governmental
organization under our lady of Africa Church, Mbuya Parish, Kampala District. Since its
inception in 2001 ROM has provided a holistic model of care with interventions designed to
target the mind, body, soul and the community to 3100 people living with HIV and over 1000
children infected and affected by HIV. ROM currently serves a targeted population of 60,000
poor residents of seven communities of Nakawa, Giza Giza, Banda, Acholi quarters, Kinawataka
1 and 2 and has more recently expanded to Kasaala in Luwero (ROM, 2008).
As a result of HIV and poverty, many clients of ROM are unable to keep their children in school.
Those who pass on leave children more vulnerable, such vulnerability leads to children being
stigmatized and neglected. To reduce this vulnerability, the OVC project, known as operation
Child Support (OCS) was started and this is a component of the social support department
activities. The social support department is one of the six departments that make up ROM, see
organogram in figure 1.
3
Figure 1: ROM Organization Hierarchy
This project was implemented under the social support department, which houses the OVC
project, known as OCS, under OCS we have the education support section known as operation
school fees (OSF) and the Psychosocial support section.
OCS has been in operation for 8 years. This project provides education support, material support,
child monitoring at school, home visits, and community based child friendly recreation activities,
psychosocial support and child protection. However, since the inception of this project, there
have been difficulties of collecting accurate data on the actual number of OVC supported, M&E
functions were not integrated into this project, there was limited involvement of implementers
(Staff) in M&E operations, the project implementers never appreciated the significance of
M&E, indicators that existed lacked Means of Verification (MOV), there was limited
documentation of goals and objectives and lack of a uniform understanding of the problem that
the OVC project was addressing and the strategies being used to address the problem . To
resolve the above challenges, the Fellow gave support to the OCS project team particularly to
streamline the M&E issues in the section to enable evidence based planning and decision making
using reliable and well articulated data.
Executive Director
Bread of Life (Micro finance)
M&E Dept
Roses of Mbuya (tailoring)
Operation Child Support Section
Operation School Fees Psycho-Social Support
Finance Dept
E .D’s Dept
Social Support Department
Medical Dept
Community Dept
4
2.0 Literature review
2.1 M&E framework A Monitoring and Evaluation framework is a tool that provides a roadmap for how the M&E
process will be conducted over the life of the project. Few countries in the world today have
effective and comprehensive systems in place to gather this data (WHO, 2004).
2.2 Why M&E
With the availability of resources, more Programs targeting OVC are being implemented. This
calls for increased efforts to monitor and evaluate these efforts at various levels to ensure the cost
effective use of these resources. Decision-makers need to be able to measure whether policies
and programs are working, and whether progress is being made towards set goals that have been
set. Donors are also placing more emphasis on performance, linking the release of funds to
performance based measures. In all this data/information is central and forms the basis of
decision making. Decision-making is critically dependent on the timely availability of sound
data/information (Zahr, 2005). Therefore a framework to guide collection, analysis, use and the
provision of information that will enable tracking successful interventions or best practices, as
well as constraints to OVC interventions is key to the sustainability of programs.
Investment in M&E can have multiple benefits, including: supporting evidence based planning
and allocating resources, enhancing transparency and helping to demonstrate results as part of
accountability to key stakeholders (WHO, 2004).
2.3 Constraints
Organizations and managers are often aware that in order to be effective they need to know on a
regular basis how well their organizations are doing; in reality, however, they often base
decisions on personal and staff judgment, anecdotal data, or haphazardly collected field
information. An assessment conducted by Ministry of Gender Labour and social Development
(MGLSD) in 2005 to establish OVC data needs and indicators being used to monitor OVC
interventions revealed that managers commonly tend to place less emphasis on monitoring and
evaluation because they perceive measuring performance as complex and time-intensive, and
they do not see a benefit to investing in M&E systems. Many organizations and their
5
management consider M&E to be a requirement of the funding agencies that support them,
because they required organizations to provide M&E plans for their proposed projects, an
external rather than internal necessity (MGLSD 2005). For instance, few managers consider
M&E to be a strategic system that they can adapt to assess their organizational capacity, judge
their economic effectiveness, or predict their organization’s future sustainability (McCoy et al.,
2005). Increasingly, very few resources are committed to capacity building and where they are
provided, it mostly target skills related to management and finance handling. Such factors and
many others, inhibit good M&E practices and improvement of project effectiveness and
efficiency.
2.4 Human resource capacity
One of the most important aspects of M&E is to ensure that the people in charge of M&E are
skilled enough to report accurately. Organizations that have interest in training health service
managers also recognize the need for more skills in M&E (Gladwin, 2000). Training should
therefore be a priority to ensure that the personnel have the necessary skills to capture data
(WHO, 2005). The staff directly involved in the generation of the data should be informed of the
importance of having accurate information as this will enable proper planning and
accountability.
2.5 Tools, data storage and use
One of the temptations in M&E is to get carried away with the technical aspects of data
collection, storage and analysis, rather than focusing on the more fundamental issues of making
sure the data is correct in the first place. This entails having in place correct tools for capturing
data first. There is no doubt that computerization of data storage and analysis has sped up data
handling considerably, but it has also drawn attention away from other more critical, and more
challenging aspects of M&E, such as coding and personnel capacity. In terms of data use,
countries have been consistently poor at supporting workers who are collecting data to use it
locally for planning and management purposes. Some observers speculate that facilitating greater
local use of data could improve data quality overall, as those doing the data collection should.
The developing countries and organizations should take action to strengthen M&E using the
available ICT. Though this due to poor economic and communication infrastructure, have been
6
limited to the national and higher levels, there should be effort to extend this to the lower
facilities (Simba, 2004).
3.0 Statement of the problem, justification, conceptual framework
3.1 Statement of the problem The orphans and vulnerable children’s project at ROM has been in operation for 8 years. However, since its inception there has been no guide that clearly defines what data needs to be collected, why the data is being collected, when the data should be collected, for whom the data needs to be collected (consumer), Who is responsible for data collection and how this data is reported). This has hindered the capacity of M&E to quantify the impact that the OVC project has had on the target population, justifying the results of the OVC projects interventions and the existence of the OVC project. This situation is further complicated by the existence of multiple funding partners, each demanding different data for different needs.
3.2 Justification The M&E framework based on the critical M&E questions in planning of (what, why, when, for
whom, who and how) will work to:
• Guide and align donor support to ROM priorities
• Outline how ROM plans to track the performance of its OVC project intervention,
• Provide guidance to the implementing staff in developing annual operations plans and
aligning them to ROM goals and targets
• Act as an instrument to assist with the mobilization and allocation of resources to the
OVC project
The framework intends to set out for ROM staff the tools and formats for the monitoring and
evaluation of the OCS interventions. It focuses on partner and internal reporting and some
additional instruments to track impact.
3.3 Conceptual framework for developing an M&E framework The Conceptual framework for developing an M&E framework for implementing OCS
interventions was based on the results chain model.
One level of objective should lead to the next level of objective as follows:
7
Figure 2: Conceptual framework for developing an M&E framework for implementing OCS interventions
‐National OVC policy, NSPPI, NSP, PMMP and ROM strategic plan -M&E technical working group & resource persons - Other relevant OVC and M&E materials -Energies - Financial resources
-Review existing documents
-Review the ROM OVC project
-Facilitate the establishment of the M&E
technical working group
- Develop and gain consensus on results
frame matrix & Indicators
- Review and where necessary design
new appropriate data collection tools
Ongoing discussions and feedback with
the M&E technical working group to
agree on content, draft documents,
materials and emerging issues
-Consultations & Consensus building
meeting
-Review workshops
-Train staff
-Develop an operational manual
M&E framework
focusing on
education, child
protection and
psychosocial
interventions at
ROM.
Inputs Processes Outputs
Effective and efficient
collection, analysis, use
and provision of
information that will
enable tracking
successful interventions
or best practices, as well
as constraints to OVC
interventions.
Improved quality of ROM OVC programming
Outcomes Impact
4.0 Project objectives
4.1 General objective To develop a comprehensive Monitoring and Evaluation framework that will effectively guide
data collection, analysis, use and the provision of information that will lead to improved quality
of OVC programming at ROM.
4.2 Specific objectives To develop a Monitoring and Evaluation framework that clearly defines goals and objectives of
Operation Child Support interventions.
1. To develop and select suitable performance indicators for output and outcomes of the
Operation Child Support interventions.
2. To review existing tools and make suggestions on how best they can be improved and
aligned to the organizations goals and objectives
3. To train staff in the implementation of the framework
5.0 Methodology Project implementation mainly followed a participatory approach involving all the relevant
stakeholders. The project implementation methods included:
1. Technical discussions with the technical working group (TWG), there was on going
consultation with the academic mentor who helped the Fellow to conceptualize the
project idea, Host mentors and some of the senior managers at ROM.
2. Worked through a project team: The Fellow worked with a project team which comprised
of the M&E Coordinator, Social support Coordinator, OCS Team Leaders and Assistants.
The team members were vital in guiding the activities under their respective areas of
specialty.
3. Used a phased implementation strategy/approach: The project was implemented
following a two phased approach i.e. in the initial stages an M&E framework was
developed and in the later stages of the project the capacity of the OVC section staff was
built in the use of the framework through training.
9
4. Mini-workshop, meetings and discussions: a mini-workshop was held with the senior
Managers to review structure, sections, content, flow, format, volume and consistency of
the draft M&E Framework.
5. Worked with an external facilitator: to guide the project team through the process of
developing the Log frame and the M&E matrix.
5.1 Project implementation
5.1.1 Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation framework This process involved holding of a two days workshop in which we had an external facilitator
hired to guide the project team through the process of developing the project goal, and objectives
which are the core of any M&E frame. The Fellow was largely involved in facilitating the
workshop, synthesizing the workshop discussions into a draft document, reviewing the
organisations documents, streamlining the objective hierarchy, defining the means of verification
and assumptions. A draft log frame was developed and discussed. A mini workshop was held to
discuss the draft log frame with senior Managers and directors.
Figure 1: The project team in the process of developing the project goal, and objectives-
guided by an External Facilitator
Figure 2: Some of the photos taken during the workshops
5.1.2 Developing and selecting suitable performance indicators This process involved reviewing old indicators, developing new indicators, and collecting all
these into a summary sheet, while doing this the fellow focused on the impact, outcome, output
and processes of all the indicators (See Appendix 2 –M&E Matrix). This was the starting point
for the fellow and the project implementers to clarify what exactly the OCS team was to measure
prior to the generation of the indicators. Other donors supporting OCS have specific indicators to
be monitored. These plus indicators from OCS were merged and indicated in the M&E Matrix.
Emphasize was put on the frequency of data collection, the sources of data and the responsible
persons. The indicators were arranged as per the objectives hierarchy i.e. impact, out come,
output and process indicators.
5.1.3 Reviewing existing data collection tools
Data collection tools were developed and standardized to capture all the data that is needed for a
particular OVC program.
The forms developed address all reporting requirements by ROM and other stakeholders.
Particularly, the following tools were developed and approved:
• OVC Assessment form
• OVC enrollment form was improved to accommodate unique identification number and
other important variables like date of birth and Site.
• Supported Children’s follow-up form was developed.
• Attendance form for all OCS activities: In order to ensure that the number of children
and youth involved in OCS activities are consistently collected, a standardized attendance
form was designed to record participants of any OCS activity carried out. This Form will
be attached to the minutes or narrative report.
• Activity report form for psychosocial activities: Every time a psychosocial support
activity is carried out, this form will be completed. The form will include information on
the types of activities carried out, the content of activities and who was involved, as well
as details of the content of any training.
12
• Support/Material distribution form: Whenever any materials are distributed or issued,
this form will be filled by the responsible person and will be recorded and captured
against the OVC unique number
5.1.4 Training staff in the implementation of the framework Capacity building of the staff in the use of the framework through training was done. Lecturing,
coaching, facilitation, discussions, questions and answers, brain storming, presentation and
discussions were the main methods used.
5.1.5 Developing an electronic Relational Database As part of the project, the fellow managed the process of developing an electronic Relational
Database with tables that store the data and interfaces were developed using Visual Basic to
access data from MYSQL database. SQL (Structured Query Language) is used to generate
reports from the database. This will improve monitoring and evaluation of OVC activities at
ROM, given the fact that most of the data is on paper
Figure 3: OVC Support module
13
The database was installed on the server and a workstation was created and is being used to
capture the data through the computer network to the centralized database. The following logical
structure was used in the Process of developing the module:
PROCESS OF DEVELOPING THE MODULE
Figure 4 Process of developing the module
Supported children are allocated unique numbers to facilitate follow up through the system.
Data can now be entered online from the workstations connected to the server and reports can be
generated easily.
Figure 5 supported children’s unique identification numbers
14
6.0 Ethical considerations
The proposal was reviewed by the Makerere University School of Public Health Higher Degree
Research and Ethics Committee and obtain clearance from the Uganda National Council of
Science and Technology (See appendix for Copies of clearance letters).
Efforts were made to minimize bias by incorporating an external facilitator as opposed to using
pre-set notions by the TWG of what the process should be.
7.0 Dissemination Out puts of this activity were disseminated at consensus building meetings and technical working
group reviews.
8.0 Sustainability of the project ROM management was deeply involved in this project because this is the main reason why they
asked for a fellow. All members of the OCS project were fully involved right from the beginning
of the project, in the absence of the Fellow these documents will continue to be used.
References
Abou Zahr, C.; Boerma, T. More than money is needed to improve health information systems.
Bulletin of the World Health Organization (WHO): the International Journal of Public Health
(2005). Available online at: http://www.who.int/entity/bulletin/volumes/83/8/578.pdf
Agency for International Development (USAID) and MEASURE Evaluation Providing tools to
reliably measure the well being of vulnerable children, the U.S. http://www.cpc.edu/measure/
(2007)
Agency for International Development (USAID) and MEASURE Evaluation, Improving global
M&E of programs for orphans and vulnerable children, the U.S. http://www.cpc.edu/measure/
(2007)
Gladwin Jean, Robert A. Dixon and Tom D. Wilson Managing misinformation - introducing a
new health management information system in Uganda .University of Sheffield, UK / id21
Development Reporting Service (2002)
http://www.id21.org/health/h1jg4g2.html
Gladwin J, Dixon R.A, and Wilson T.D Strengthening health information management in an east
African country using eternal training materials. Health information Journal Vol 6 No. 1, 9-14
(2000)
McCoy K. Lynn et’al, Patricia Njeri Ngari Edwin E. Krumpe. Building monitoring, evaluation
and reporting systems for HIV/AIDS programs (2005)
Ministry of Gender Labour and Social Development the district capacity and M&E assessment
report (2005), unpublished
Reach-Out Mbuya 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
16
Simba DO, (2004) Application of ICT in strengthening the Health Information system in the
developing countries in the wake of globalization. African Health Sciences Dec; 4(3): 195-199.
(2004).
Uganda AIDS Commission (UAC). National Strategic Plan for HIV/AIDS 2007/08 to 2011/12,
Moving Towards Universal Access. (2007)
Uganda AIDS Commission, The National HIV/AIDS Performance Measurement and
Management plan (PMMP)for the National Strategic Plan for HIV/AIDS 2007/08 to
2011/12, Moving Towards Universal Access.(2007)
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). The Framework for Protection, Care and Support of
Orphans and Vulnerable Children Living in a World with HIV and AIDS. New York: UNICEF,
the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); 2004.
WHO Improving the use of information for health care decision-making: what is needed World
Health Organization / World Health Organization (WHO) (2005)
WHO Practical principles on building and improving health management information systems.
Regional Office for the Western Pacific / WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific (WHO-
WPRO) (2004)
WHO Practical principles on building and improving health management information systems.
Regional Office for the Western Pacific / WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific (WHO-
WPRO) (2004)
17
Appendix I Project Log frame
Project Title: OCS Start date: April 2010 End date: March 2015
NARRATIVE SUMMARY What does the project want
to achieve?
INDICATORS How can we
tell if we have
achieved it?
MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Where can we get information that will tell us
this?
ASSUMPTIONS What else must happen if it is to succeed?
Project goal IMPROVED QUALITY OF LIFE OF CHILDREN INFECTED AND AFFECTED BY HIV&AIDS IN MBUYA PARISH Objective1:0 Evaluation Indicators (contribution)
TO INCREASE THE PROPORTION OF CHILDREN OF SCHOOL GOING AGE WHO COMPLETE SCHOOL FROM (50%-75%) BY 2015.
% of children who complete school
SP-mid-term and end of term review report
Ministry of Education and other stakeholders remain committed in ensuring quality education
Output 1:1 Monitoring Indicators (attribution) Children Enrolled in schools
# of children enrolled in school
OVC Educational Support registry
School Authorities will be cooperative
Activity 1:1:1 Carry out House Hold assessment # of House Holds assessed HH assessment Report Criteria will be followed during assessment
Activity 1:1:2 Categorization of beneficiaries into Primary, secondary and Vocation
# of children per category established
OVC Educational Support registry per category
Activity 1:1:3 Identify and Enroll intended beneficiaries into formal education
# of children identified & enrolled into formal education
List of identified & enrolled children and project reports
Parents/guardians will be cooperative
Activity 1:1:4 Identification of suitable schools # of suitable schools identified & selected
List of suitable schools identified & project reports
Parents/guardians/school authorities will be cooperative
Activity 1:1:5 Placement in schools # of children placed in schools List of children placed in schools & project reports
Parents/guardians/school authorities will be cooperative
18
Project Log frame
Project Title: OCS Start date: April 2010 End date: March 2015
NARRATIVE SUMMARY What does the project want
to achieve?
INDICATORS How can we
tell if we have
achieved it?
MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Where can we get information that will tell us
this?
ASSUMPTIONS What else must happen if it is to succeed?
Project goal IMPROVED QUALITY OF LIFE OF CHILDREN INFECTED AND AFFECTED BY HIV&AIDS IN MBUYA PARISH Output 1:2 Monitoring Indicators (attribution)
School fees for OVC attending school paid # of children whose fees has been paid
OVC Educational Support registry, Financial reports & beneficiary lists
Continued commitment of donors
Activity 1:2:1 Collection of previous terms reports to verify the child’s attendance
Previous terms reports on Childs file
Childs file
Activity 1:2:2 Develop school fees lists for active supported children
Active supported children’s school fees lists in place
Beneficiary lists & project reports
Activity 1:2:3
Processing payment of school fees
# of children whose fees has been paid
Financial reports & beneficiary lists, interview of beneficiaries
Continued commitment of donors
Activity 1:2:4 Negotiate and sign MOU with the school authorities Signed MOU in place MOU Terms of the MOU will be adhered to by the schools
Output 1:3 Monitoring Indicators (attribution)
Short term non-tuition materials support and other basic needs provided
# of children benefited Beneficiary lists, Distribution forms on Childs file & project reports
Continued commitment of donors
Activity 1:3:1 Development of beneficiaries lists beneficiaries lists in place Beneficiary lists file Willingness of the staffs to develop these lists
Activity 1:3:2 Preparations of procurement requests # of requisitions raised Financial reports & procurement records
Activity 1:3:3 Request and distribution of non-tuition materials # of children benefiting Beneficiary file & interview of beneficiaries
Continued commitment of donors
Activity 1:3:4 Narrative and financial report writing Narrative and financial report in place
Report File
19
Project Log frame
Project Title: OCS Start date: April 2010 End date: March 2015
NARRATIVE SUMMARY What does the project want
to achieve?
INDICATORS How can we
tell if we have
achieved it?
MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Where can we get information that will tell us
this?
ASSUMPTIONS What else must happen if it is to succeed?
Project goal IMPROVED QUALITY OF LIFE OF CHILDREN INFECTED AND AFFECTED BY HIV&AIDS IN MBUYA PARISH Output 1:4 Monitoring Indicators (attribution)
Children in school followed to ascertain their attendance and performance
# of children followed Internal audit & performance assessment report
Supported children will be willing to go to school
Activity 1:4:1 Develop schedule for the follow-up Schedule for school follow-up in place
Work plan Willingness of the staffs to develop the schedule
Activity 1:4:2 Carry out actual school visits # of school visits/Child follow-up forms on file
School visit reports staff will comply
Activity 1:4:3 Assessing the performance of the children at the end of the term
# of children whose performance has been assessed
Performance assessment report, School records and project reports
staff will comply
Activity 1:4:4 Follow up with home visits for the children who are at risk of dropping out of school
# of home visits conducted Child follow-up forms on file
Home visit reports staff will comply
Objective 2:0 Evaluation Indicators (contribution)
TO REDUCE THE RISK OF CHILD ABUSE AMONG CHILDREN WITHIN OUR CARE BY 2015
% level of OVC abused or exploited reduced
Evaluation and Baseline studies
The stakeholders will be supportive
Output 2:1 Monitoring Indicators (attribution) Awareness about child protection issues increased
# of awareness campaigns conducted
Attendance list & project reports
The community will adhere to the campaigns and put the message in practice
Activity 2:1:1 Carry out child safety assessment child safety assessment report on file
Assessment report & children’s fillies
The stakeholders will be supportive
Activity 2:1:2
Mobilization of stakeholders
Stakeholders mobilization report on file
Attendance lists, project reports, attendance reports and meeting minutes
20
Project Log frame
Project Title: OCS Start date: April 2010 End date: March 2015
NARRATIVE SUMMARY What does the project want
to achieve?
INDICATORS How can we
tell if we have
achieved it?
MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Where can we get information that will tell us
this?
ASSUMPTIONS What else must happen if it is to succeed?
Project goal IMPROVED QUALITY OF LIFE OF CHILDREN INFECTED AND AFFECTED BY HIV&AIDS IN MBUYA PARISH Activity 2:1:3 Develop and disseminate training manual guidelines Training manual in place resource center
Activity 2:1:4 Train staff, volunteers, children and the community of mbuya in child related advocacy
# of staff trained Attendance list & training reports
staff, volunteers, children and the community will practice the acquired skills
Output 2:3 Monitoring Indicators (attribution)
Basic assistance after abuse provided # of cases assisted, Basic assistance report on Childs file
On file The stakeholders will be supportive
Activity 2:3:1 Report child abuse cases to relevant authorities # of child abuse cases reported Report on child abuse cases on file
Project child abuse records
The stakeholders will be supportive
Activity 2:3:2 Refer child abuse cases to other networks # of cases referred Project child abuse records
The stakeholders will be supportive
Output 2:4 linkages established with other service providers to scale up child protection
# of organizations networked with
Activity 2:4:1 Identification of other service providers Other service providers Inventory in place
Other service providers Inventory
willingness of other service providers to cooperate
Activity 2:4:2 Create collaborations/networks # of organizations networked with
Report File
Activity 2:4:3 Refer child abuse cases to these networks # of cases referred Report File Objective3:0 Evaluation Indicators (contribution)
TO REDUCE THE PROPOTION OF CHILDREN PRESENTING WITH PSYCHOSOCIAL ISSUES IN MBUYA PARISH 2015
% of children and families reporting behavior change among children who previously presented themselves with PSS issues
Evaluation and Baseline studies
Behavior change will take place
21
Project Log frame
Project Title: OCS Start date: April 2010 End date: March 2015
NARRATIVE SUMMARY What does the project want
to achieve?
INDICATORS How can we
tell if we have
achieved it?
MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Where can we get information that will tell us
this?
ASSUMPTIONS What else must happen if it is to succeed?
Project goal IMPROVED QUALITY OF LIFE OF CHILDREN INFECTED AND AFFECTED BY HIV&AIDS IN MBUYA PARISH Output 3:1 Monitoring Indicators (attribution) Psychosocial support system strengthened
Activity 3:1:1 Develop and disseminate training manual (implication Tools)
Training manual in place resource center
Activity 3:1:2 Conduct refresher trainings for staff and volunteers to enable them identify, support and mentor CATTS in the provision of appropriate psychosocial services.
# of staff trained Attendance list & training reports
Availability of funds on time
Activity 3:1:3 Mobilize and offer PSS and life skills to OVC # of OVC supported per category
Beneficiary lists & project reports
Activity 3:1:4 Develop and disseminate PSS service delivery SOPs
PSS service delivery SOPs in place
in the resource center
Output 3:2 Monitoring Indicators (attribution)
IGAs to sustain the project strengthened # of children trained
Activity 3:2:1 Training in Brass band # of children who are trained & are active members of the brass band # Troops in place
Skills adopted will be used
Activity 3:2:2
Training in MDD
# of children who are trained & are active members of the MDD groups # Troops in place
The skills will be put to proper use
22
Project Log frame
Project Title: OCS Start date: April 2010 End date: March 2015
NARRATIVE SUMMARY What does the project want
to achieve?
INDICATORS How can we
tell if we have
achieved it?
MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Where can we get information that will tell us
this?
ASSUMPTIONS What else must happen if it is to succeed?
Project goal IMPROVED QUALITY OF LIFE OF CHILDREN INFECTED AND AFFECTED BY HIV&AIDS IN MBUYA PARISH Activity 3:2:3
Training in Art and crafts # of children trained & Items produced
The skills will be put to proper use
Output 3:3 Monitoring Indicators (attribution)
Issues presented by OVC addressed appropriately # of OVC with improved emotional well being (i.e. more self-reliant, skilled and assertive)
Activity 3:3:1 On-going emotional support, from trained facilitator or a peer
# of sessions conducted # of children accessing counseling
Beneficiary interviews & Reports
Activity 3:3:2 Conduct Health education sessions # of children equipped with appropriate value based life skills
project report and PSS records
The skills will be put to proper use
Activity 3:3:3 Behavior change program # of sessions conducted The right massage will be adopted by the children
Activity 3:3:4 Recreation activities Output 3:4 Monitoring Indicators (attribution)
Community involvement strengthened
Activity 3:4:1 Support to parents/caretakers to plan for the future of their children
Total number of care takers supported to plan for the future of their children
Attendance list, Willingness of these parents to collaborate
Activity 3:4:2 Meeting parents to discuss their children’s performance
Total number of parents/care takers met to discuss their children’s performance
Attendance list,
23
Project Log frame
Project Title: OCS Start date: April 2010 End date: March 2015
NARRATIVE SUMMARY What does the project want
to achieve?
INDICATORS How can we
tell if we have
achieved it?
MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Where can we get information that will tell us
this?
ASSUMPTIONS What else must happen if it is to succeed?
Project goal IMPROVED QUALITY OF LIFE OF CHILDREN INFECTED AND AFFECTED BY HIV&AIDS IN MBUYA PARISH Activity 3:4:3 Sensitizing parents on the importance of taking
children to school Total number of parents/care takers who attend the meeting
Attendance list,
Output 3:5 Monitoring Indicators (attribution)
Linkages established with other service providers # of organizations networked with
project & networking meetings reports
Willingness of these organizations to collaborate
Activity 3:5:1 Identification of other service providers Other service providers inventory in place
On file
Activity 3:5:2 Create collaborations/networks # of organizations networked with
project & collaboration meetings reports
Willingness of these organizations to collaborate
Activity 3:5:3 Refer child abuse cases to these networks # of cases referred project & referral reports
24
Appendix II
OCS M&E Matrix (2010-2015) Log Frame Reference Data Collection & Analysis Reporting & Information Use
Indicator Primary Data Source Frequency of Data Collection
Who is Responsible Reports Produced
Used by Who Feed Back To
Objective 1:0
% of children who complete school
SP-mid-term and end of term review report
Semi and end of SP period
M&E & Social Support Coordinator
Detailed Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
Output 1:1 # of children enrolled in school
OVC Educational Support registry
Quarterly/Annually Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Detailed quarterly Progressive report
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
Activity 1:1:1
# of House Holds assessed
HH assessment Report After the activity has been carried out
OCS Supervisor & OSF Team leader
Detailed HH assessment Report
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Activity 1:1:2
# of children per category established
OVC Educational Support registry per category
Annually OSF Team leader Detailed Annual Progressive report
OCS Team
Activity 1:1:3
# of children identified & enrolled into formal education
List of identified & enrolled children and project reports
After the activity has been carried out
OSF Team leader & Assistants
Detailed quarterly Progressive report
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Activity 1:1:4
# of suitable schools identified & selected
List of suitable schools identified & project reports
After the activity has been carried out
Social Support Coordinator , OCS Supervisor & OSF Team leader
Detailed List of suitable schools identified
Activity 1:1:5
# of children placed in schools
List of children placed in schools & project reports
After the activity has been carried out
OCS Supervisor , OSF Team leader & Assistants
Detailed List of children placed in schools
25
OCS M&E Matrix (2010-2015) Log Frame Reference Data Collection & Analysis Reporting & Information Use
Indicator Primary Data Source Frequency of Data Collection
Who is Responsible Reports Produced
Used by Who Feed Back To
Output 1:2 # of children whose fees has been paid
OVC Educational Support registry, Financial reports & beneficiary lists
Quarterly/Annually Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Detailed quarterly Progressive report
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
Activity 1:2:1
Previous terms reports on child’s file
child’s file OCS Assistants
Activity 1:2:2
Active supported children’s school fees lists in place
OSF Team leader
Activity 1:2:3
# of children whose fees has been paid
OVC Educational Support registry & Finance records
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Activity 1:2:4
Signed MOU in place Social Support Coordinator
Output 1:3 # of children benefited OVC Material Assistance Register
Quarterly/Annually Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
Activity 1:3:1
beneficiaries lists in place
OCS Assistants
Activity 1:3:2
# of requisitions raised OSF Team leader
Activity 1:3:3
# of children benefiting
OVC Material Assistance Register
After the activity has been carried out OCS Assistants
]Activity 1:3:4
Narrative and financial report in place
Review of project records Social Support Coordinator & Finance department
Output 1:4 # of children followed Review of project records Quarterly/Annually Social Support Coordinator & Supervisor
Directors, senior Managers & OCS
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
26
OCS M&E Matrix (2010-2015) Log Frame Reference Data Collection & Analysis Reporting & Information Use
Indicator Primary Data Source Frequency of Data Collection
Who is Responsible Reports Produced
Used by Who Feed Back To
Supervisor
Activity 1:4:1
Schedule for school follow-up in place
Review of project records OSF Team Leader
Activity 1:4:2
# of school visits/Child follow-up forms on file
OVC Educational Support Register
After the activity has been carried out
OCS Assistants
Activity 1:4:3
# of children whose performance has been assessed
OCS Supervisor and OSF Team Leader
Activity 1:4:4
# of home visits conducted Child follow-up forms on file
After the activity has been carried out
OCS Assistants
Objective 2:0
% level of OVC abused or exploited reduced
Semi and end of SP period
M&E Coordinator & Social Support Coordinator
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
Output 2:1 # of awareness campaigns conducted
Quarterly/Annually Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
Activity 2:1:1
child safety assessment report on file
After the activity has been carried out
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Activity 2:1:2
Stakeholders mobilization report on file
After the activity has been carried out Team Leaders and
Assistants
Activity 2:1:3
Training manual in place
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Activity # of staff trained After the activity has Social Support
27
OCS M&E Matrix (2010-2015) Log Frame Reference Data Collection & Analysis Reporting & Information Use
Indicator Primary Data Source Frequency of Data Collection
Who is Responsible Reports Produced
Used by Who Feed Back To
2:1:4 been carried out Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Output 2:3 # of cases assisted, Basic assistance report on child’s file
Quarterly/Annually
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
Activity 2:3:1
# of child abuse cases reported Report on child abuse cases on file
OCS (Legal support register) OCS Team
Activity 2:3:2
# of cases referred OCS Team
Output 2:4 # of organizations networked with
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
Activity 2:4:1
Other service providers Inventory in place PSS Team Leader
Activity 2:4:2
# of organizations networked with OCS Team
Activity 2:4:3
# of cases referred OCS Team
Objective 3:0
% of children and families reporting behavior change among children who previously presented themselves with PSS issues
Semi and end of SP period
M&E Coordinator & Social Support Coordinator
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
Output 3:1
Quarterly/Annually
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Directors, senior Managers & OCS
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
28
OCS M&E Matrix (2010-2015) Log Frame Reference Data Collection & Analysis Reporting & Information Use
Indicator Primary Data Source Frequency of Data Collection
Who is Responsible Reports Produced
Used by Who Feed Back To
Supervisor
Activity 3:1:1
Training manual developed and in place
Training document
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Activity 3:1:2
# of staff trained
Training register
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Activity 3:1:3
# of OVC supported per category PSS Team Leader
Activity 3:1:4
PSS service delivery SOPs in place PSS SOPs Document SP mid-term review PSS Team leader
Output 3:2 # of children trained
OVC Training Register Quarterly/Annually
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
Activity 3:2:1
# of children who are trained & are active members of the brass band # Troops in place OVC Club Register PSS Team leader
Activity 3:2:2
# of children who are trained & are active members of the MDD groups # Troops in place PSS Team leader
Activity 3:2:3
# of children trained & Items produced PSS Team leader
Output 3:3 # of OVC with improved emotional well being (i.e. more self-reliant, skilled and Quarterly/Annually
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Directors, senior Managers & OCS
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
29
OCS M&E Matrix (2010-2015) Log Frame Reference Data Collection & Analysis Reporting & Information Use
Indicator Primary Data Source Frequency of Data Collection
Who is Responsible Reports Produced
Used by Who Feed Back To
assertive) Supervisor
Activity 3:3:1
# of sessions conducted # of children accessing counseling PSS Team leader
Activity 3:3:2
# of children equipped with appropriate value based life skills PSS Team leader
Activity 3:3:3
# of sessions conducted PSS Team leader
Activity 3:3:4
0
Output 3:4 0
Quarterly/Annually
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
Activity 3:4:1
Total number of care takers supported to plan for the future of their children
After the activity has been carried out PSS Team leader
Activity 3:4:2
Total number of parents/care takers met to discuss their children’s performance
After the activity has been carried out PSS Team leader
Activity 3:4:3
Total number of parents/care takers who attend the meeting
After the activity has been carried out PSS Team leader
Output 3:5 # of organizations networked with
Quarterly/Annually
Social Support Coordinator & OCS Supervisor
Directors, senior Managers & OCS Supervisor
Other staff, CDC, Partners & MGLSD
30
OCS M&E Matrix (2010-2015) Log Frame Reference Data Collection & Analysis Reporting & Information Use
Indicator Primary Data Source Frequency of Data Collection
Who is Responsible Reports Produced
Used by Who Feed Back To
Activity 3:5:1
Other service providers inventory in place PSS Team leader
Activity 3:5:2
# of organizations networked with
After the activity has been carried out PSS Team leader
Activity 3:5:3
# of cases referred
After the activity has been carried out