Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...
Transcript of Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...
![Page 1: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Developing a comprehensive Developing a comprehensive watershedwatershed--wide monitoring wide monitoring program for surface watersprogram for surface waters
Michael LyonsMichael LyonsStaff Environmental ScientistStaff Environmental Scientist
Watershed Regulatory ProgramWatershed Regulatory Program
September 29, 2010September 29, 2010
![Page 2: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Monitoring Program Design 101 Monitoring Program Design 101
•• Elements to Elements to consider:consider:–– ObjectivesObjectives–– Station locationsStation locations–– IndicatorsIndicators–– Assessment Assessment
thresholdsthresholds–– Data analysisData analysis
![Page 3: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
About MeAbout Me
•• 23 years 23 years -- LA Regional BoardLA Regional Board•• SWAMP coordinatorSWAMP coordinator•• NPDES permittingNPDES permitting•• Marine BiologistMarine Biologist
![Page 4: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
BrugesBruges
![Page 5: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Why Monitor ?Why Monitor ?
•• Compliance with Compliance with permit limitspermit limits
•• TMDL requirementsTMDL requirements•• BMP effectivenessBMP effectiveness•• Protection of Protection of
beneficial usesbeneficial uses•• Condition of resourceCondition of resource
![Page 6: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Where to Monitor ?Where to Monitor ?
•• Coastal ocean watersCoastal ocean waters•• Bays & estuariesBays & estuaries•• Lakes & reservoirsLakes & reservoirs•• Rivers & streamsRivers & streams•• WetlandsWetlands
•• GroundwaterGroundwater
![Page 7: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
FOCUS ON FRESHWATER STREAMSFOCUS ON FRESHWATER STREAMS
![Page 8: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
FOCUS ON FRESHWATER STREAMSFOCUS ON FRESHWATER STREAMS
![Page 9: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Starting PointStarting Point20052005
Most monitoring in lower Most monitoring in lower watershedwatershedNo monitoring in upper No monitoring in upper watershedwatershed
LA County San DistrictLA County San District’’s s NPDES monitoringNPDES monitoringLA County DPW LA County DPW stormwaterstormwater monitoringmonitoringSWAMP monitoringSWAMP monitoringOther stakeholder Other stakeholder monitoringmonitoring
_̂̂_̂_̂__̂
_̂_̂_̂
_̂̂_̂_̂_̂__̂_̂̂_̂_
#*
#*#*
#*#*
#*#*
#*#*
#* #*
Santa Fe Dam
Carbon Creek
Fullerto
nCreek
Coyote Creek
San G
abrie
l Rive
r
San Jose Creek
Walnut Creek
Water Reclamation Plants
_̂ Power Plants
#* Stormwater
Estuary
Flowing Streams
3rd Order Streams
Spreading Grounds
Lakes
San Gabriel River Watershed
0 5 10 15 202.5
Kilometers
N
![Page 11: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Integrated Monitoring PlanIntegrated Monitoring PlanMeet with StakeholdersMeet with Stakeholders
•• Los Angeles Los Angeles RegReg BdBd•• USEPAUSEPA•• So Cal Coastal Water So Cal Coastal Water
Research ProjectResearch Project•• Santa Ana Santa Ana RegReg BdBd•• LA County SanLA County San•• LA/SG River Watershed LA/SG River Watershed
CouncilCouncil•• LA Co Dept Public WorksLA Co Dept Public Works•• LA Co Dept Water & PowerLA Co Dept Water & Power•• AESAES
•• US Forest ServiceUS Forest Service•• City of DowneyCity of Downey•• Friends of SG RiverFriends of SG River•• Orange Co Orange Co StormwaterStormwater ProgProg•• Rivers & Mountains Rivers & Mountains ConservConserv•• SG Mountains SG Mountains RegReg ConservConserv•• US Army Corps of EngineersUS Army Corps of Engineers
![Page 12: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
DEFINE MONITORING OBJECTIVESDEFINE MONITORING OBJECTIVES
1.1. What is the overall What is the overall condition of streams in condition of streams in the watershed?the watershed?
2.2. Are local fish safe to eat?Are local fish safe to eat?3.3. Is it safe to swim?Is it safe to swim?4.4. Are conditions getting Are conditions getting
better or worse in the better or worse in the watershed?watershed?
5.5. Are receiving waters near Are receiving waters near discharges meeting water discharges meeting water quality objectives?quality objectives?
![Page 13: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
1. What Is the Overall Condition of 1. What Is the Overall Condition of Streams in the Watershed ?Streams in the Watershed ?
•• Targeted samplingTargeted sampling–– Areas of special interest or unique sitesAreas of special interest or unique sites
•• Major tributariesMajor tributaries•• High quality habitatHigh quality habitat•• Endangered speciesEndangered species•• Known sources of pollutionKnown sources of pollution
•• Probabilistic samplingProbabilistic sampling–– Overall conditionOverall condition–– Unbiased monitoring locationsUnbiased monitoring locations–– Percentage of stream affectedPercentage of stream affected
![Page 14: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Targeted SamplingTargeted Sampling
•• Good for tracking Good for tracking conditions at specific conditions at specific sites of interestsites of interest
•• Good for trend Good for trend monitoringmonitoring
•• Poor for determining Poor for determining overall health of overall health of watershedwatershed
•• Number of stations Number of stations depends depends (interest (interest vsvs $$)$$)
![Page 15: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Probabilistic SamplingProbabilistic Sampling
•• Good for Good for determining overall determining overall health of watershedhealth of watershed
•• Good for trend Good for trend monitoringmonitoring
•• Poor for tracking Poor for tracking conditions at specific conditions at specific sites of interestsites of interest
•• Number of stationsNumber of stations(n = 30)(n = 30)
![Page 16: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
San Gabriel River WatershedSan Gabriel River Watershed
•• Targeted sampling @ 12 Targeted sampling @ 12 stations in streams + 4 in stations in streams + 4 in estuaryestuary
•• Randomized sampling @ 30 Randomized sampling @ 30 stations in 2005stations in 2005
•• Randomized sampling @ 10 Randomized sampling @ 10 stations per year in 2006, stations per year in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, etc2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, etc
![Page 17: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Indicators of Stream HealthIndicators of Stream Health
•• Biological communityBiological community•• Habitat condition in the streamHabitat condition in the stream•• Toxicity (water column or sediment)Toxicity (water column or sediment)•• Chemical measurementsChemical measurements
–– NutrientsNutrients–– MetalsMetals–– OrganicsOrganics
![Page 18: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Biological CommunityBiological CommunityField SamplingField Sampling
![Page 19: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Biological CommunityBiological CommunityBioassessmentBioassessment MonitoringMonitoring
•• BioassessmentBioassessment monitoringmonitoring•• EPT EPT taxataxa = good= good
–– EphemeropteraEphemeroptera (mayfly)(mayfly)–– PlecopteraPlecoptera (stonefly)(stonefly)–– TrichopteraTrichoptera ((caddisflycaddisfly))
![Page 20: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Biological CommunityBiological CommunityBioassessmentBioassessment MonitoringMonitoring
•• Pollution tolerant Pollution tolerant species = badspecies = bad–– Midges (Midges (chironomidaechironomidae))–– Worms (Worms (oligochaetaoligochaeta))–– Flies (Flies (dipteradiptera))
![Page 21: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Toxicity TestingToxicity Testing
•• Acute toxicity = Acute toxicity = mortalitymortality
•• Chronic toxicity = Chronic toxicity = impaired growth or impaired growth or reproductionreproduction
•• Toxic (high, Toxic (high, moderate, low) moderate, low) vsvs NonNon--toxictoxic
![Page 22: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Chemical MonitoringChemical Monitoring
•• Nutrients (ammonia, nitrate, Nutrients (ammonia, nitrate, phosphate)phosphate)–– Comparison to Basin Plan Comparison to Basin Plan
objectivesobjectives
•• Metals (As, Metals (As, CdCd, Cr, Cu, , Cr, Cu, PbPb, Hg, , Hg, Ni, Se, Ag, Zn)Ni, Se, Ag, Zn)
•• Organics (Organics (DDTsDDTs, PCBs, , PCBs, PAHsPAHs, , pyrethroidpyrethroid pesticides)pesticides)–– Comparison to CTR and/or Basin Comparison to CTR and/or Basin
PlanPlan
![Page 23: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
San Gabriel River WatershedSan Gabriel River Watershed
![Page 24: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Assessment ThresholdAssessment ThresholdBiological CommunityBiological CommunityIBI = Index of Biotic IBI = Index of Biotic
IntegrityIntegrity
IBI 2005-09
0102030405060708090
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
IBI Score
Perc
enta
ge
![Page 25: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
HabitatHabitat
all lower main upper
3050
7090
CRAM
Ove
rall
Sco
re
all
lower
main
upper
0 20 40 60 80 100
Buffer
Score
all
lower
main
upper
0 20 40 60 80 100
Hydrology
Score
all
lower
main
upper
0 20 40 60 80 100
Physical structure
Score
all
lower
main
upper
0 20 40 60 80 100
Biotic structure
Score
![Page 26: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
ToxicityToxicity
Significant Response by Sub-Regionn = Sig Tox Mainstem Lower Rand Upper Rand
2005 CeriodaphniaSurvival 23 1 0 0 1
Reproduction 23 5 0 2 3
2006 CeriodaphniaSurvival 10 0 0 0 0
Reproduction 10 0 0 0 0
2007 CeriodaphniaSurvival 9 0 0 0 0
Reproduction 9 2 0 1 1
2008 CeriodaphniaSurvival 9 2 0 1 1
Reproduction 9 2 0 1 1
2009 CeriodaphniaSurvival 10 0 0 0 0
Reproduction 10 1 0 1 0
TOTALS 122 13 0 6 7
% 11% 0% 5% 6%
Significant Endpoints
![Page 27: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Chemical MonitoringChemical Monitoring
all lower main upper
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Lead
conc
entra
tion
(ug/
L)
all lower main upper
05
1015
20
Nickel
conc
entra
tion
(ug/
L)
all lower main upper
01
23
45
6
Selenium
conc
entra
tion
(ug/
L)
all lower main upper
010
2030
40
Zinc
conc
entra
tion
(ug/
L)
![Page 28: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Chemical MonitoringChemical Monitoring
all
low
er
mai
n
uppe
r
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Ortho Phosphorus
conc
entra
tion
(mg/
L)
all
low
er
mai
n
uppe
r
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Total Phosphorus
conc
entra
tion
(mg/
L)
all
low
er
mai
n
uppe
r
0
2
4
6
8
10
Nitrate as N
conc
entra
tion
(mg/
L)
all
low
er
mai
n
uppe
r
0
2
4
6
8
10
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
conc
entra
tion
(mg/
L)
![Page 29: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Are Local Fish Safe to Eat ?Are Local Fish Safe to Eat ?
•• Targeted popular fishing areasTargeted popular fishing areas–– La Mirada LakeLa Mirada Lake–– Puddingstone ReservoirPuddingstone Reservoir–– Santa Fe Dam ReservoirSanta Fe Dam Reservoir–– San Jose Creek (2 locations)San Jose Creek (2 locations)–– San Gabriel River (2 locations)San Gabriel River (2 locations)–– Estuary (2 locations)Estuary (2 locations)
•• Sample every 1Sample every 1--3 years3 years
![Page 30: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Are Local Fish Safe to Eat ?Are Local Fish Safe to Eat ?Mercury (ppb) Common Carp
Large Mouth Bass Catfish Striped Mullet Tilapia Redear Sunfish Bluegill
LakesLa Mirada Lake-06 NDLa Mirada Lake-08 10Puddingstone Lake 2004 54 320Puddingstone Lake 2006 327Puddingstone Lake 2007 223Puddingstone Lake 2008 160 10Puddingstone Lake 2009 20 290 40 20 20Puddingstone Lake 2009 210 20Puddingstone Lake 2009 40Santa Fe Dam 2006 81 448Santa Fe Dam 2007 162
RiversSan Jose Creek-06 22San Jose Creek-07 40 21SGR at Alondra Blvd-07 NDSGR at Alondra Blvd-08 ND
EstuariesUpper Estuary-06 NDUpper Estuary-07 40 NDUpper Estuary-08 10 ND 10Upper Estuary-09 NDLower Estuary-07 ND
![Page 31: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Is It Safe to Swim ?Is It Safe to Swim ?
•• Targeted popular recreational areas + Targeted popular recreational areas + sentinel sitessentinel sites–– Note that Note that ““swimswim”” means REC 1 (swimming, means REC 1 (swimming,
wading, waterwading, water--skiing, skin and scuba diving, skiing, skin and scuba diving, surfing, white water activities and fishing)surfing, white water activities and fishing)
•• 8 popular 8 popular recrec areas + 5 sites above areas + 5 sites above major confluences + 1 estuary sitemajor confluences + 1 estuary site
•• E. coli at E. coli at recrec & sentinel sites (weekly & sentinel sites (weekly MayMay--Sept)Sept)
•• Total & fecal Total & fecal coliformcoliform + + enterococcusenterococcus in in estuary (twice a week yearestuary (twice a week year--round)round)
![Page 32: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Is It Safe to Swim?Is It Safe to Swim?Sentinel Sites May June July August September
Year n = No. %
San Gabriel (R9W) 2007 257 181 417 260 239 19 12 63%2008 58 167 130 71 237 21 9 43%2009 52 232 102 273 203 24 9 38%
Coyote Creek (RA1) 2007 444 305 173 350 326 19 13 68%2008 455 296 341 416 357 21 9 43%2009 270 187 75 74 24 24 5 21%
Coyote Creek (Valley View) 2007 130 98 51 77 107 19 5 26%2008 162 29 29 48 199 21 2 10%2009 139 125 168 58 13 24 7 29%
San Jose Creek (C1) 2007 457 4481 1224 1495 929 19 17 89%2008 1337 3797 1339 4946 1228 21 19 90%2009 10140 4827 720 1477 2992 24 24 100%
Walnut Creek 2007 2281 322 378 468 407 16 9 56%2008 210 29 12 20 21 21 1 5%2009 171 33 49 51 128 24 8 33%
Totals 317 149 47%
Geometric Mean Single Sample Exceedances
E. coli 30 day standard – 126 MPN/100 mLSingle sample standard – 235 MPN/100 mL
![Page 33: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Is It Safe to Swim ?Is It Safe to Swim ?
![Page 34: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Are Conditions Getting Better or Are Conditions Getting Better or Worse Over Time ?Worse Over Time ?
Nitrate as N
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year
mg/
L
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
Total Phosphorous
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year
mg/
L
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
Total Organic Carbon
0
10
20
30
40
50
2009 2005 2006 2007Year
mg/
L
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
![Page 35: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Are Conditions Getting Better or Are Conditions Getting Better or Worse Over Time ?Worse Over Time ?Dissolved Copper
0
3
6
9
12
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year
µg/L
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
Dissolved Nickel
0
2
4
6
8
10
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year
µg/L
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
Dissolved Selenium
0
2
4
6
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year
µg/L
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
Dissolved Zinc
0
10
20
30
40
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year
µg/L
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
![Page 36: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Are Conditions Getting Better or Are Conditions Getting Better or Worse Over Time ?Worse Over Time ?
Ceriodaphnia Survival
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year
Perc
ent C
ontr
ol501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
Regulatory Threshold
Ceriodaphnia Reproduction
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Year
Perc
ent C
ontr
ol
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
Regulatory Threshold
![Page 37: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Are receiving waters near discharges Are receiving waters near discharges meeting water quality objectives ?meeting water quality objectives ?
![Page 38: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHEDSAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHEDPREPRE-- & POST& POST--COLLABORATIONCOLLABORATION
_̂̂_̂_̂__̂
_̂_̂_̂
_̂̂_̂_̂_̂__̂_̂̂_̂_
#*
#*#*
#*#*
#*#*
#*#*
#* #*
Santa Fe Dam
Carbon Creek
Fulle
rton
Creek
Coyote Creek
San G
abrie
l Rive
r San Jose Creek
Walnut Creek
Water Reclamation Plants
_̂ Power Plants
#* Stormwater
Estuary
Flowing Streams
3rd Order Streams
Spreading Grounds
Lakes
San Gabriel River Watershed
0 5 10 15 202.5
Kilometers
N
●
●●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
● ●
●●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲
▲
Santa Fe Dam
Carbon Creek
Fulle
rton
Creek
Coyote Creek
San
Gab
riel R
iver
San Jose Creek
Walnut Creek
Station Type▲ SWAMP Targeted
● SWAMP Random
▲ Local Partners Targeted
● Local Partners Random
Estuary
Flowing Streams
3rd Order Streams
Spreading Grounds
Lakes
San Gabriel River Watershed
0 5 10 15 202.5
Kilometers
N
![Page 39: Developing a comprehensive watershed-wide monitoring ...](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051801/62819191046860394e65792e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)