Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

download Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

of 65

Transcript of Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    1/65

    Annjaneth Briones and Nathalie Dagmang

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    2/65

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    3/65

    an electron is transferred from one

    reactant to another

    Zn(s)

    + Cu2+ Cu(s)

    + Zn2+

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    4/65

    An electron-exchange

    reaction/oxidation or reduction

    at an electrodeqa spontaneous redox reaction

    produces energy or

    a non-spontaneous redox

    reaction uses up energy

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    5/65

    Direct Electrochemical Cell

    No work done Work done/needed

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    6/65

    Spontaneous

    reactionGenerates or

    stores energy

    ex. batteries

    Non-spontaneous

    reactionUses up electrical

    ex. Metal plating,

    recovery of metal

    from ores

    Voltaic/GalvanicCell ElectrolyticCell

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    7/65

    Voltaic/GalvanicCell ElectrolyticCell

    load Power

    supply

    energy

    energy

    +- + -

    Work done by

    system to

    surroundings

    Work done on

    system by

    surroundings

    cathodecathode anodeanode

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    8/65

    ANODE CATHODE

    Rxn Ion movingtowards it

    Sign Rxn Ion movingtowards it

    Sign

    Galvanic

    Cell

    oxidation anions _ reduction cations +

    Electrolytic

    celloxidation anions + reduction cations _

    difference b/w the anode and cathode of galvanic and

    electrolytic cells is their polarity

    Flow of electrons: ANODE CATHODE (ALWAYS)

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    9/65

    Voltaic/Galvanic Cell

    Volt-

    meter

    +

    Cu

    CuSO4

    -

    Zn

    ZnSO4

    Salt bridge

    e- e-

    2K+

    SO42-

    Zn(s)Zn2+

    (aq) + 2e- Cu2+ (aq) + 2e

    - Cu(s)

    Cathode = ReductionAnode = Oxidation

    Zn|Zn2+

    ||Cu2+

    |Cu

    1

    2

    3

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    10/65

    Has infinite resistance = wont consumeelectricity

    Measures the potential difference of the 2half cells (Voltage)

    parameter for the tendency of the reaction toproceed to an equilibrium state (same Vs)

    potential continues to decrease until it reaches0.00 V.

    Measures the Electromotive Force (EMF)

    Electric work it can do/ can be extracted

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    11/65

    Prevents the direct reaction but stillmaintains electrical contact b/w the halfcells.

    Provides ions to neutralize its charges

    Negative ions positive half-cell (Zinc)

    Positive ions negative half-cell (Copper)

    Some SO42-ions (from the cathode vessel) and some

    Zn2+ ions (from the anode vessel) also migrate intothe salt bridge.

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    12/65

    Solid conductor through which an electric

    current enters or leaves

    Collector or emitter of electric charge

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    13/65

    -

    Oxidation takes place

    Zn(s)Zn2+

    (aq) + 2e-

    ZnSO4electrolyte

    Zn2+

    SO42-

    Zn(s)

    e-

    e-

    Reducing agent causes the cathode

    to reduce

    less e-

    affinity

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    14/65

    +

    Reduction takes place

    Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- Cu(s)

    CuSO4electrolyte

    Cu2+

    SO42- Cu(s)

    e-

    e-

    Oxidizing agent causes the anode

    to oxidize

    more e-

    affinity

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    15/65

    Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- Cu(s)

    Zn(s) Zn2+

    (aq) + 2e-

    Zn(s) + Cu2+ Cu(s) + Zn

    2+

    (reduction)

    (oxidation)

    (Over-all reaction)

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    16/65

    Electric current - transfer of charge throughelectrolytic and metallic conduction

    Electrolytic or ionic conduction- charge is carried

    by ions: cations move toward the cathode and anionsmove toward the anode

    Metallic conduction- charge is carried by flow ofelectrons from the negative pole to the positive pole

    the electrical conductors in an electrochemical cellare the electrodes (via metallic conduction), and theelectrolyte solution (via electrolytic conduction)

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    17/65

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    18/65

    Potential at standard conditions: 1.00 M

    1 atm

    25 C

    Independent on number of moles Cu2+

    (aq)+ 2e- Cu

    (s)E = 0.34 V

    2Cu2+ (aq) + 4e- 2Cu(s) E = 0.34 V

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    19/65

    Measure of the tendency for a reduction

    to occur (when SHE is the anode) (+) V = spontaneous

    (-) V = non-spontaneous

    When reaction is reversed (turned into

    oxidation), V changes sign

    Standard reduction potential Potential when the SHE (Standard Hydrogen

    Electrode) is the anode

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    20/65

    Potential assigned as 0.00 V

    2H+ + 2e- H2

    H2

    2H+ + 2e-

    E = 0.00 V

    E = 0.00 V

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    21/65

    Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- Cu(s)

    Zn(s) Zn2+

    (aq) + 2e-

    Zn(s) + Cu2+ Cu(s) + Zn

    2+ Ecell = 1.103 V

    E cathode = 0.340 V

    E anode = -0.763 V

    E cathode - E anode = E cell*reduction potentials are used

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    22/65

    Factors affecting cell potential: Concentration

    Temperature

    Nature of reactant

    E = E - RT ln QnF

    where:

    R (gas constant) = 8.314 J/molK,

    T = temperature in Kelvin,

    n= number of moles e- in rxn

    F (Faraday ) = 96, 485 Coulombs

    Q = reaction quotient

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    23/65

    (Substituting the constants and assuming 25C

    temperature)

    E = E - 0.0592 log Qn

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    24/65

    At equilibrium, G = 0, Ecell = 0, and Q = Keq

    thus,

    becomes

    Solving for Keq, we get:

    Note that Keq can be Ksp, Ka, Kb, Kf, etc.

    Qlog

    n

    0592.0EE cell

    ocell !

    eqcello

    Klogn

    0592.0E !

    !

    0592.0

    )E)(n(logantiK

    cello

    eq

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    25/65

    Thus, the reaction is spontaneous only ifG isnegative and Ecell is positive

    Example: Calculate the Go in J/mol for

    3 Sn4+

    + 2 Cr

    3 Sn2+

    + 2 Cr3+

    Cathode: 3(Sn4+ + 2e- Sn2+) Eo = + 0.15 VAnode: 2(Cr Cr3+ +3e-) Eo = - 0.74 V

    Eocell = (+0.15 V) (-0.74 V) = + 0.89 V

    The very negative value ofG indicates that thereaction is product-favored. This is consistent with the

    positive value of Ecell

    cellnFEG !(

    where F = 96485

    C/mol e-, n = no. of

    e

    -

    transferred

    mol/J230,515V89.0emol

    C485,96

    rxnmol

    emol6nFEG cell

    oo !

    !!(

    Note: 1 J = 1 CV

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    26/65

    Let us now calculate for the Keq of theprevious example

    Recall: E

    o

    cell = (+0.15 V) (-0.74 V) = + 0.89 VThus,

    the very large value of Keq reinforces ourprevious conclusion that the reaction isproduct-favored

    90eq 10x59.1

    0592.0

    )89.0)(6(loganti !

    !

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    27/65

    C = AtWhereC = amount of electricity passing

    A (ampere) = current

    T= seconds

    1 F = 96,500 Coulomb/mole e-

    the mass of the product formed or the reactant

    used is proportional to the amount of electricity

    that passes through the system

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    28/65

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    29/65

    1 Set-up the following half-cells:

    Zn

    1 M ZnSO4

    Zn|Zn2+(1 M)

    C

    2 M FeSO4+2 M FeCl3

    Fe3+(1 M), Fe2+|Fe

    Cu

    1M CuSO4

    Cu|Cu2+(1 M)

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    30/65

    C

    2 M FeSO4+2 M FeCl2

    Fe3+(1 M), Fe2+|Fe

    * Why graphite and not Iron nail?

    Desired reaction is

    Fe3+ Fe2+ not Fe3+ Fe

    When iron nail is used:

    Fe3+ Fe2+ FeOFe3+ is oxidized to Fe2+ which will cause rusting

    Graphite = semi-conductor

    - inert; wont participate, will only conduct

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    31/65

    2Connect the Cu2+/Cu half-cell with avoltmeter and a KNO3 salt bridge

    Volt-meter

    X

    CuSO4

    Salt bridge

    Cu

    X-

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    32/65

    3Record Voltmeter reading

    Volt-meter

    X

    CuSO4

    Salt bridge

    Cu

    X-

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    33/65

    1 Set-up the following half-cells:

    C

    1 M KCl

    Cl- (1 M), Cl2|C

    1 M KI1M KBr

    Br-(1 M), Br2|C I-(1 M), I2|C

    C C C C C

    Carbon = inert wont participate in the rxn

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    34/65

    2 Connect to 1.5 V dry cells for 1 minto generate X2

    C

    1 M KCl

    Cl-(1 M), Cl2|C

    1 M KX1M KBr

    Br-(1 M), Br2|C I-(1 M), I2|C

    C C C C C

    batt batt batt

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    35/65

    * What happened:

    C

    KI + I2

    I-(1 M), I2|C

    C

    batt

    Bubbles

    formed from

    H20

    Formed brownish

    substance

    (Iodine / I2)

    2I- I2 + 2e-

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    36/65

    * What happened:

    C

    KCl + Cl2

    Cl-(1 M), Cl2|C

    KBr + Br2

    Br-(1 M), Br2|C

    C C C

    batt batt

    Bubbles Bubbles

    Yell ish

    2Cl- Cl2 + 2e- 2Br- Br2 + 2e

    -

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    37/65

    3 Connect the electrolyzed solutions tothe Cu half cell

    Volt-

    meter

    CCu

    KX, X2

    Salt bridge

    CuSO4

    X2 + 2e- 2X-

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    38/65

    3 Record voltmeter reading

    Volt-meter

    CCu

    KX, X2

    Salt bridge

    CuSO4

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    39/65

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    40/65

    Cell Notation Volts

    Cu|Cu2+||Cu2+|Cu 0.0896

    Zn|Zn2+||Cu2+|Cu 1.08

    Cu|Cu2+||Fe3+|Fe 0.414

    C|Cl-,Cl2||Cu2+|Cu 0.468

    C|Br-,Br2||Cu2+|Cu 0.269

    C|I-,I2||Cu2+|Cu 0.121

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    41/65

    Finding for Eanode:

    Take second set-up:

    Zn|Zn2+||Cu2+|Cu

    Given:

    Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- Cu(s) , E = 0.34

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    42/65

    Finding for Eanode:

    Take second set-up:

    Zn|Zn2+||Cu2+|Cu

    Manipulating the equation:

    E cathode - E anode = E cell0.34 - E anode = E cell

    E anode = 0.34 - E cell

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    43/65

    Zn|Zn2+

    ||Cu2+

    |CuExperimental E cell = 1.08 V

    E anode = 0.34 - 1.08

    E anode

    = - 0.74Zn2+ (aq) + 2e

    - Zn(s) , E = 0.763

    % error = [-0.763 (- 0.74)]/-0.763

    = 3.01%

    Finding for Eanode:

    Take second set-up:

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    44/65

    Finding for Ecathode:

    Take third set-up:

    Cu|Cu2+||Fe3+, Fe2+|C

    Given:

    Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- Cu(s) , E = 0.34

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    45/65

    Finding for Ecathode:

    Take third set-up:

    Cu|Cu2+||Fe3+, Fe2+|C

    Manipulating the equation:

    E cathode - E anode = E cell

    E cathode = E cell + 0.34

    E cathode = 0.34 + E cell

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    46/65

    Finding for Ecathode:

    Take third set-up:

    Cu|Cu2+

    ||Fe3+

    , Fe2+

    |CExperimental E cell = 0.414 V

    E cathode = 0.414 + 0.34

    E cathode = 0.754 V

    Fe3+ + e- Fe2+ E= 0.771

    % error = [0.771- 0.754)]/0.771= 2.2 %

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    47/65

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    48/65

    Voltage reading: E = 0.468 V

    Ecathode = Ecell + 0.34

    Ecathode = 0.468 + 0.34 =0.808V

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    49/65

    Take 4th set-up:

    C|Cl-, Cl2||Cu2+|Cu

    Data:

    Ampere = 0.065 A

    Time = 270 seconds

    Substituting:

    C = 0.065 x 270 = 17.55 Coulombs

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    50/65

    Take 4th set-up:

    C|Cl-, Cl2||Cu2+|Cu

    From the equation,

    2 mol e- = 2 mol Cl- transformed to Cl2Hence,

    1.818 x 10-4 mol e- = 1.818 x 10-4 mol Cl-

    2Cl- (aq) Cl2+ 2e-

    17.55 C x(1 mole e-/96,500 C) = 1.818 x 10-4

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    51/65

    Take 4th set-up:

    C|Cl-, Cl2||Cu2+|Cu

    0.025 mol Cl- - 1.818 x 10-4 mol Cl- = 0.0248182 mol Cl- left0.0248182 mol Cl-/0.025 L = 0.992728 M

    [Cl-] = 0.992728 M

    Cl2 is a gas, so the activity of Cl2 is taken as 1,

    so Q = __1__[Cl-]2

    2Cl- (aq) Cl2+ 2e-

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    52/65

    E = E - 0.0592 log Q

    n

    Substituting E, n and Q in the equation

    0.808 = E - 0.0592 log (1.014704)2

    E = 0.808 + 0.0001876479346

    = 0.8081876479V

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    53/65

    Cell Notation Cathode Anode

    Cu|Cu2+||Cu2+|Cu Copper Copper

    Zn|Zn2+||Cu2+|Cu Copper Zinc

    Cu|Cu2+||Fe3+|Fe Iron Copper

    C|Cl-,Cl2||Cu2+|Cu Copper Chlorine

    C|Br-,Br2||Cu2+|Cu Copper Bromine

    C|I-,I2||Cu2+|Cu Copper Iodine

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    54/65

    Cell Notation Cathode Anode

    Cu(s)|Cu2+

    (aq) (1M)|| Cu2+

    (aq)

    (1M)|Cu(s)

    Cu2+(aq)(1M)|Cu(s)

    Cu(s)|Cu2+

    (aq) (1M)

    Zn(s)|Zn2+

    (aq) (1M)|| Cu2+

    (aq)

    (1M)|Cu(s)

    Cu2+(aq)

    (1M)|Cu(s)

    Zn(s)|Zn2+

    (aq) (1M)

    Cu(s)|Cu2+

    (aq) (1M) ||Fe3+

    (aq) (1M),

    Fe2+(aq) (1M)|C(graphite)

    Fe3+(aq) (1M),

    Fe2+(aq)(1M)|C(graphite)

    Cu(s)|Cu2+

    (aq) (1M)

    C(graphite)| Cl2(g) |Cl-(aq) (1M)||Cu

    2+(aq)

    (1M)|Cu(s)

    Cu(s)|Cu2+

    (aq)

    (1M)

    C(graphite)| Cl2(g)

    |Cl-(aq) (1M)

    C(graphite)| Br2(l),Br-(aq) (1M)||Cu

    2+(aq)

    (1M)|Cu(s)

    Cu(s)|Cu2+

    (aq)

    (1M)

    C(graphite)| Br2(l),Br-

    (aq) (1M)

    C(graphite)| I2(s),I-(aq) (1M)||Cu

    2+(aq)

    (1M)|Cu(s)

    Cu(s)|Cu2+

    (aq)

    (1M)

    C(graphite)| I2(s),I-(aq)

    (1M)

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    55/65

    Variable Half-

    Cell Notation

    Calculated

    Volts

    Book

    Value

    % Error

    Cu|Cu2+ 0.2504 0.34 26 %

    Zn|Zn2+ - 0. 4 - 0. 63 3.0 %

    Fe3+|Fe 0. 54 0. 2.2 %

    C|Cl-,Cl2 *0.808 .359 40.54 %

    C|Br-,Br2 *0.609 .08 43.9 %

    C|I-,I2 *0.46 0.6 5 25.04 %

    * assuming concentration did not change with electrolysis

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    56/65

    More (-) Ered Higher tendency to be oxidized

    Higher reducing power

    When placed as anode, reaction is spontaneous

    More (+) Ered

    Higher tendency to be reduced Higher oxidizing power

    When placed as cathode, reaction is spontaneous

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    57/65

    Take Electrolysis for 4th set-up:

    C|Cl-, Cl2

    Voltage is applied

    Vapplied = Eanode - Ecathode

    2Cl- (aq) Cl2+ 2e-

    Reduction potential = 1.359 V spontaneous

    Oxidation potential = -1.359 V non-spontaneous

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    58/65

    2Cl- (aq) Cl2+ 2e-

    At equilibrium,Eanode = EcathodeV = 0Oxidation and reduction at same rate

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    59/65

    If Eanode = Ecathode system at equilibriumIf Eanode > Ecathode Ecathode,EanodeIf Eanode < Ecathode Ecathode,Eanode

    2Cl- (aq) Cl2+ 2e-

    In the experiment, we want to produce more Cl2

    oxidation should predominate

    Eanode should increase

    should be Eanode > Ecathode

    Vapplied = Eanode - Ecathode

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    60/65

    Ecathode = E - 0.0592 log [Cl-]2

    n [Cl2]

    2Cl- (aq) Cl2+ 2e-

    Eanode

    = E - 0.0592 log [Cl2

    ]n [Cl-]2

    Cl2 = Ecathode = Ered = spontaneity

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    61/65

    Concentration changed as the halogen

    solutions were electrolyzed

    Electrolysis did not produce enough

    halogen, X2 that will be reduced

    Slightly different concentrations (not both

    exactly 1 M)

    increase in voltage reading(concentration difference can also cause

    potential diff)

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    62/65

    Example: Calculate the mass ofcopper metal produced at the

    cathode during the passage of 2.50

    amperes of current through a solution

    of copper(II) sulfate for 50.0 minutes.

    Cu2+(aq) + 2e- Cu(s)

    Current X

    Time

    no. of

    Coulombs

    Useful

    Conversions:

    1 J = 1 CV

    1 A = 1 C/s

    Mass of

    substanceMol. of e-

    passed

    Cug47.2emol2

    Cug5.63

    C485,96

    emol1

    s

    C50.2

    min1

    s60min0.50Cug !

    !

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    63/65

    A galvanic cell is to be constructed using a Fe3+/Fe2+ halfcell and a Br2/Br

    - half-cell. The Br2/Br- half-cell was

    constructed by electrolyzing 50 mL of 0.5 M KBr using a 2.5A current for 3 minutes. The Fe3+/Fe2+ half cell wasconstructed by mixing 25 mL of 2 M FeSO4 and 25 mL of 2 M

    FeCl3. (MW Br2: 159.8 g/mol)

    Fe3+ (aq) + e- Fe2+

    (aq) Eo

    red = +0.771 VBr2(aq) + 2e

    - 2Br-(aq) Eo

    red = +1.087 V

    a) Assuming that the bromide ions are converted to Br2(aq),

    crcalculate [Br2] and [Br

    -

    ] upon electrolysis.b) Write the cell notation (with the correct phases andconcentrations of ions) for the galvanic cell

    c) Calculate the Ecell for the galvanic cell.

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    64/65

    Answers:

    a) [Br2] = 0.046638 M, [Br-] = 0.406722 M

    b) Fe2+(aq) (1M), Fe3+

    (aq)

    (1M)||Br2(aq)(0.046638 M), Br-(aq)

    (0.406722 M)

    c) 0.2997243 V

  • 8/7/2019 Determination of Electrode Potentials Oral Report

    65/65

    Belcher, R. Quantitative Inorganic Analysis,1970

    Christian, G.D. Analytical Chemistry, 1986

    Day, Underwood, et al. Quantitative Analysis,

    1967Haenisch, Pierce, et al. Quantitative Analysis,

    1958

    Skoog, et al., Fundamentals of Analytical

    Chemistry, Eighth edition, 2004 http://academic.pgcc.edu/psc/chm103/103_m

    anual.pdf