Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various...

27
Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director of Engineering New England Ropes, Inc. 848 Airport Road Fall River, MA 02720 USA Phone: 508-678-8200 / 800-333-6679 Fax: 508-679-2363 / 800-647-6731 www.neropes.com

Transcript of Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various...

Page 1: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Determination of Dry CoatingEffectiveness Against Water impregnation.

An examination of various testing methods. 

William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E.Director of Engineering

New England Ropes, Inc.848 Airport Road

Fall River, MA 02720

USA

Phone: 508-678-8200 / 800-333-6679

Fax: 508-679-2363 / 800-647-6731

www.neropes.com

Page 2: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

UIAA Journal 2/2001 Pg. 25

Available at WWW.UIAA.CH

Page 3: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Definition

dry (dri) adj. Etymology: Middle English, from Old English dryge; akin to Old High German truckan dry, Old English drEahnian to drainDate: before 12th century

1 a : free or relatively free from a liquid and especially water b : not being in or under water <dry land>

c : lacking precipitation or humidity <dry climate>

Page 4: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

• Fact: By Definition: Reduced water impregnation will reduce weight gain.

• Assumption: Keeping water out will keep performance up 

• Proper care and handling to reduce unnecessary water exposure is best 1st choice.

Page 5: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Behavior of Nylon when Wet.

• Weight Gain

• Decrease of tensile strength by 10% - 15%

• Decreased resistance to Yarn on Yarn Abrasion.

• Reduced Elongation

• Increased Impact force

• Decreases number of drops sustained.

• Increased diameter

• Increased risk!

Page 6: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Yarn Finish/Coating Technology

• Spin Finishes

• Marine Overlay Finishes

• Wax Emulsions

• Mineral Oil based products

• Silicone

• Multi part polymer coatings

• Proprietary coatings

Page 7: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Dying process removes beneficial finishes

• Benefits of coating• Improved Hydrophobic properties

• Improved Yarn on Yarn Abrasion Resistance

• Improved Yarn on Metal Abrasion Resistance

• Decreased Internal Yarn on Yarn Friction

• Reduction of dirt impregnation

• Increased Life? 

Page 8: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Manufacturer Claim

Page 9: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Manufacturer Claim

Page 10: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Manufacturer Claim

Page 11: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Manufacturer Claim

Page 12: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Manufacturer Claim

Page 13: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Manufacturer Claim

Page 14: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Manufacturer Claim

Page 15: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Manufacturer Claim

Page 16: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Alternate Test Methods• Water Droplet Test

• Flotation / Buoyancy Test.

• Shower Test – Mammut

• German Military Standard– Test TL 4020-0015 (BWB) Dynamic Ropes.

Method AMethod B (72 Hour Immersion)

• U.S. Fed. Test Method Std. No. 191A – Method 4500

– Method 6011 (24 Hour Immersion)

• 1, 2, 4, 24, 48, 72 Hour Immersion

Page 17: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Test ParametersU.S. FED-STD-191A

(6011)German TL 4020-0015 -

Method BImmersion Test Shower Test

Sample Preparation Length of sample 15" 200mm 200mm 200mm

Sealing of ends No Yes Yes Yes

Water Specifications (Store Bought Distilled Water was used for all tests)Ph 7 7 7 7Hardness 0 0 0 0Temperature 21°C - 70°F 21°C - 70°F 21°C - 70°F 21°C - 70°F

MethodologyWetting Method 9" submerged in loop Placed in 75mm H20 Placed in 75mm H20 18 l/m showerTest Duration (Hours) 24 Hours 72 Hours 1, 2, 4, 24, 48, 72 Hours 2.5 Min.

Drainage Method 1.5 Hours (Rack) 500g weight-3 Min. 3 Min. (Rack)Shake excess/weigh

immediatelyWeighing of Sample Nearest 0.001g Nearest 0.001g Nearest 0.001g Nearest 0.001g

Page 18: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Results of testing.Water Absorption

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

Shower Test 1 Hour 2 Hour 4 Hour 24 Hour 48 Hour 72 Hour

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

Page 19: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Results of testing.Water Absorption

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

FED-STD-191A (6011) 24 Hour Immersion

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

Page 20: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Results of testing.Water Absorption

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

72 Hour Immersion TL 4020-0015 - Method B

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

Page 21: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

What happens if the rope is washed?

Page 22: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Results of testing.Water Absorption

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

1 Hour Immersion 1 Hour Immersion (After wash)

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

Page 23: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Results of testing.Water Absorption

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

FED-STD-191A (6011)

1 HourImmersion

2 HourImmersion

4 HourImmersion

24 HourImmersion

48 HourImmersion

72 HourImmersion

TL 4020-0015- Method B

1 Hour Immersion (After wash)

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

Page 24: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Conclusions

• All dry coatings are not equal.

• Ropes with better performance perform better in all tests.

• Some ropes have a barrier which allows them to float, this barrier is very fragile.

• These tests only address weight of water absorbed, not performance when wet.

Page 25: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Conclusions

• Best Test Method– Standard length samples.– Hold sample submerged to prevent surface

tension effect.– 1 hour duration, Longer is not necessary.– Drain on rack for 3 min.

Page 26: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.

Further Study Required

• Decrease in performance of nylon ropes vs. % of moisture gained.

• Real world exposure. Which method is most realistic?

Page 27: Determination of Dry Coating Effectiveness Against Water impregnation. An examination of various testing methods. William J. (Bill) Fronzaglia P.E. Director.