Determinants of Sam Adams Beer
description
Transcript of Determinants of Sam Adams Beer
June 20, 2007 MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H. Dash, Jr.
Determinants of Sam Adams Beer
Leah SemonelliIryna Sieczkiewicz Meghan SmithAdamson E. Streit
2 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Agenda• Objective
• Hypotheses
• Variable Identification
• Methodology
• Statistics
• Results
• Conclusion
3 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Objective• Develop an econometric model
that explains the determinants of sales in Sam Adams beer
• Use a variety of pertinent data to help explain this relationship
4 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Hypotheses• H1: Weather conditions influence Sam
Adams sales
• H2: Advertising affects Sam Adams sales
• H3: Major sporting events lead to quarterly increases in Sam Adams sales
• H4: Major holidays lead to quarterly increases in Sam Adams sales
5 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Variables – Dependent
• Quarterly beer sales of the Boston Beer Company, Inc. from 1997 to 2006
6 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Variables – Independent • Nat’l Quarterly Precipitation Data
• Nat’l Quarterly Temperature Data
• No. Major U.S. Holidays per Qtr.
• Major Sporting Events per Qtr.
• Sam Adams Advertising Allowance
7 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
• Exogenous– Major Sporting Events– U.S. Holidays– Temperature– Precipitation
• Endogenous– Advertising
Variable ID & Definitions
8 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Methodology• Data was collected from the U.S.
gov’t websites on Internet– E.g., SEC, NOAA
• Monthly data was converted into quarterly data using Microsoft Excel
9 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Methodology, Cont’d• WinORS™ software package was used to
perform all calculations
• Stepwise Regression was used to determine the most significant variables
• Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) tested data for:– Normality– Homoscedasticity– Multi-Colinearity– Serial Correlation
10 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Statistics• Variables not statistically
significant:– No. Major U.S. Holidays
• (E.g., Memorial Day, Labor Day)
– No. Major Sporting Events• (E.g., World Series, Superbowl)
11 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Statistics, Cont’d• Variables are statistically
significant:– Precipitation levels
– Avg. Temperature
– Advertising Expense
12 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Results• The Derived Equation:
Q = 122.746 + 0.0005A + 1.909T – 1.490P
• Q = No. Barrels sold (Thousands)• A = Advertising ($ Thousands)• T = Avg. Temperature (oF)• P = Avg. Precipitation (In.)
13 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Result’s Cont’d• Regression Predictive Model Plot
Predictive Ability (OLS)Dependent Variable: Barrels, thousands
Actual Predicted
Observation454239363330272421181512963
Act
ual &
Pre
dict
ed
440
420
400
380
360
340
320
300
280
260
14 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Result’s Cont’d• Model Data
Root MSE 29.714
SSQ (Res) 31785.83
Dep. Mean 322.975
Coef of Var. (CV) 9.20%
R2 75.86%
Adj. R2 72.18%
P value = 0.00002; CI =99.998%
15 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Result’s Cont’d• Multicolinearity
– Variance Inflation Factors (VIFs)• Measure the impact of colinearity in a
regression model on the precision of estimation. It expresses the degree to which colinearity among the predictors degrades the precision of an estimate.
– In practice, VIF < 10.0– Our VIF = 2.128
16 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Result’s Cont’d• VIF Parameters
Variable VIF
Advertising, $ thousands 1.089
Temperature 2.718
Precipitation 2.576
Avg. VIF 2.128
NOTE: WinORS calculates our VIF at 2.128, which is the same as above
17 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Result’s Cont’d• Residual Error (Constant Var.)
White's Test for Homoscedasticity 13.294
P-Value for White's 0.14974
Note: Ho for White’s Test states that residuals are Homoscedastic
18 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Result’s Cont’d• Constant Variance Plot
Constant Variance Test (OLS)Dependent Variable: Barrels, thousands
Predicted396384372360348336324312300288276264252
Res
idua
l
60
48
36
24
12
0
-12
-24
-36
-48
19 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Result’s Cont’d• Outliers & Normality Plot
Normal Probability Chart (OLS)Dependent Variable: Barrels, thousands
Expected Residual7260483624120-12-24-36-48-60-72
Sor
ted
Res
idua
l
60
48
36
24
12
0
-12
-24
-36
-48
20 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Result’s Cont’d• Elasticities
Variable Avg. Elasticity
Advertising 0.33869
Temperature 0.32025
Precipitation 0.38340
All variables are inelastic!!
21 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Conclusions• Major Holidays & Major Sporting
Events do not affect sales of Sam Adams
• Advertising, Temperature, & Precipitation affect Sam Adams sales– More in-depth data needed to prove or
disprove
R2 ~ 75% at CI = 99%
22 of 23June 20, 2007MBA 555 – Professor Gordon H.
Dash, Jr.
Result’s Cont’dReferencesSecurities & Exchange Commission
http://www.sec.gov
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationhttp://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html
Class Notes, Professor Gordon H. Dash, Jr.