Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18,...

46
Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014

description

Standard BT Model

Transcript of Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18,...

Page 1: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility

Chicago, HCEO working GroupApril 18, 2014

Page 2: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Motivations

1. Relation between inequality and mobility (Great Gatsby curve)

2. Size of the intergenerational persistence, eg Clark’s recent book. In contrast, in a study of surnames in the Catalonia census, 2001, Guell, Rodriguez Mora and Telmer find:

• In a calibration exercise estimating (Informational Content of surnames, Gini (of surnames), number of persons per surname) an intergenerational coefficient for education of 0.6

• Assortative mating is large, and has increased in the 20th century

Page 3: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Standard BT Model

Page 4: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Standard Model

Page 5: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Model

Page 6: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Mating rules

Page 7: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Predictions

Page 8: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

First intuition: Single gene model

Page 9: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Assortative mating on phenotype

Page 10: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

INCOME DISTRIBUTION

Small number of genes (5), 20 thousand individuals, 100 periodsas variance of income increases

Page 11: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.
Page 12: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.
Page 13: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.
Page 14: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.
Page 15: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.
Page 16: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

INTERGENERATIONAL IMMOBILITY

Page 17: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.20.4

0.60.8

1

Intergenerational immobility (rho)medium income variance

gamma

rho

beta

Page 18: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.20.4

0.60.8

1

Intergenerational Immobility (rho)small income variance

gamma

rho

beta

Page 19: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Small variance

Higher variance in income shock

beta

gam

ma

Page 20: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

INEQUALITY

Page 21: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

Den

sity

0 5 10Income

beta = 0.8, gamma = 1

0.2

.4.6

Den

sity

-1 0 1 2 3Income

beta = 0.8, gamma = 0.2

0.2

.4.6

.8D

ensi

ty

-1 0 1 2 3Income

beta = 0.2, gamma = 10

.51

1.5

2D

ensi

ty

-.5 0 .5 1Income

beta = 0.2, gamma = 0.2

Gini 0.14 Gini 0.33

Gini 0.18 Gini 0.41

Page 22: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

0.2

.4.6

.8Lo

renz

Inco

me

0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1Cumulative population proportion

beta = 0.2, gamma = 0.2

0.5

11.

52

Lore

nz In

com

e

0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1Cumulative population proportion

beta = 0.2, gamma = 1

0.5

11.

52

Lore

nz In

com

e

0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1Cumulative population proportion

beta = 0.8, gamma = 0.2

0.5

11.

52

Lore

nz In

com

e

0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1Cumulative population proportion

beta = 0.2, gamma = 1

Page 23: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

GammaBeta

0.2 1

0.2 0.30 0.97

0.8 0.94 1.000

Immobility

Page 24: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.2, gamma = 0.2

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.2, gamma = 1

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.8, gamma = 0.2

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.8, gamma = 1

Gene frequency, 5 genes, high variance

Deviations from HW

Page 25: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.2, gamma = 0.2

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.2, gamma = 1

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.8, gamma = 0.2

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.8, gamma = 1

Gene frequency, 5 genes, low variance

Deviations from HW

Page 26: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

LARGER NUMBER OF GENES

Larger number of genes (20), 10 thousand individuals, 100 periodsas variance of income increases

Page 27: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.
Page 28: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.
Page 29: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.
Page 30: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.
Page 31: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.
Page 32: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

0.5

11.

52

Den

sity

-.5 0 .5 1Income

beta = 0.2, gamma = 0.2

0.2

.4.6

.8D

ensi

ty

0 1 2 3Income

beta = 0.2, gamma = 10

.2.4

.6.8

1D

ensi

ty

-1 0 1 2 3Income

beta = 0.8, gamma = 0.2

0.0

5.1

.15

Den

sity

0 2 4 6 8 10Income

beta = 0.8, gamma = 1

Page 33: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

0.2

.4.6

.8Lo

renz

Inco

me

0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1Cumulative population proportion

beta = 0.2, gamma = 0.2

0.5

11.

5Lo

renz

Inco

me

0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1Cumulative population proportion

beta = 0.2, gamma = 10

.51

1.5

Lore

nz In

com

e

0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1Cumulative population proportion

beta = 0.8, gamma = 0.2

02

46

Lore

nz In

com

e

0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1Cumulative population proportion

beta = 0.8, gamma = 1

Page 34: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

GammaBeta

0.2 1

0.2 0.224 0.867

0.8 0.839 1.002

Immobility

Page 35: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.2, gamma = 0.2

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.2, gamma = 1

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.8, gamma = 0.2

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.8, gamma = 1

Gene frequency, 20 genes, high variance

Page 36: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.2, gamma = 0.2

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.2, gamma = 1

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.8, gamma = 0.2

0.1

.2.3

.4.5

.6Fr

actio

n

0 1 2Gene

beta = 0.8, gamma = 1

Gene frequency, 20 genes, low variance

Page 37: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Predictions on the genetic similarity among spouses

Page 38: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Notation

Page 39: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Similarity among individuals

Page 40: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Beta=0.2, gamma=0.2, v = 0.2

Page 41: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Beta=0.4, gamma=0.4, v = 0.2

Page 42: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

ASSORTATIVE ON WHAT?

Page 43: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

IQ: r = 0.37

8010

012

014

016

0IQ

_MO

M

60 80 100 120 140 160IQ_DAD

Page 44: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Traditionalism (MPQ) r = 0.43

3040

5060

70TR

_M

30 40 50 60 70TR_D

Page 45: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Control (MQP derived) r = 0.20

100

120

140

160

180

200

CN

_M

80 100 120 140 160 180CN_D

Page 46: Determinants of inequality and intergenerational mobility Chicago, HCEO working Group April 18, 2014.

Education: polychoric r = 0.777

02

46

810

ED

_MO

M

0 2 4 6 8 10ED_DAD