DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF RICKETTSIAE IN … · ompA and ompB genes respectively). The two...
Transcript of DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF RICKETTSIAE IN … · ompA and ompB genes respectively). The two...
DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF
RICKETTSIAE IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Helen Clare OWEN, BVMS
This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch
University, 2007.
ii
I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main
content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary
education institution
…………………………………………
Helen Clare OWEN
iii
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to address the shortfall in current, in-depth knowledge of
Western Australian rickettsiae. Historically, murine typhus had been extensively
reported and, more recently, serological studies and a small number of diagnosed
cases indicated that spotted fever group rickettsiae were also present in the State,
however no attempts had been made to isolate or characterize these rickettsiae.
To facilitate investigation, ectoparasites (principally ticks) were opportunistically
collected from across the State, with an emphasis on native and feral animals and
people. All ectoparasites were screened for rickettsial infection using a polymerase
chain reaction incorporating Rickettsia-specific citrate synthase gene (gltA) primers.
Preliminary sequencing was performed on representative PCR-positive samples from
each geographical location, vertebrate host and ectoparasite in order to identify and
characterize the infecting rickettsia. Isolation in cell culture and further genotypic
characterization was then performed. Finally, a serosurvey and questionnaire were
implemented in one of the study areas to determine whether people were being
infected with a Rickettsia spp. and whether infection was associated with clinical
signs.
Ectoparasite collection produced three genera of ticks (Ixodes, Amblyomma and
Haemaphysalis) from native animals, feral pigs and people, primarily from the
southwest of Western Australia and Barrow Island in the Pilbara region. Ticks from a
number of sources were shown to be infected with rickettsiae by the PCR, including
feral pigs, people, bobtail lizards, kangaroos, bandicoots, burrowing bettongs,
iv
common brushtail possums and yellow-footed antechinus. Genotypic characterization
of positive amplicons from ticks revealed the presence of two novel spotted fever
group rickettsiae. Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov., named in honour of Dr Stephen Graves,
was identified extensively throughout the southwest of the State and on Barrow Island
in Ixodes, Amblyomma and Haemaphysalis spp. ticks from multiple hosts. Candidatus
“Rickettsia antechini” was detected in Ixodes spp. only from yellow-footed antechinus
in Dwellingup. In addition, a novel Bartonella spp. (Bartonella sp. strain Mu1) was
also detected from Acanthopsylla jordani fleas collected from yellow-footed
antechinus in Dwellingup.
Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov. is most closely related to the Rickettsia massiliae
subgroup of the spotted fever group and to R. rhipicephali in particular. Sequence
similarities between this novel species and the subgroup were 99.7%, 98.4%, 95.8%
and 97.4% based on its 16S rRNA, gltA, ompA and ompB genes respectively.
Candidatus “Rickettsia antechini” also demonstrated a close relationship to the R.
massiliae subgroup (99.4%, 94.8% and 97.1% sequence similarity based on its gltA,
ompA and ompB genes respectively). The two novel Western Australian species
demonstrated 98.4%, 96.3% and 96.7% sequence similarity to each other based on
gltA, ompA and ompB genes respectively indicating separate species. The novel
Bartonella spp. (Bartonella sp. strain Mu1) detected in fleas collected from yellow-
footed antechinus in Dwellingup demonstrated greatest gltA gene sequence similarity
to Bartonella strain 40 at 86.1%.
Results from the serosurvey and questionnaire-based investigation into the zoonotic
importance of R. gravesii sp. nov. on Barrow Island supported the results of the tick
v
study and suggested that a tick-borne rickettsia(e) was infecting people on the island.
However, a significant association between seroconversion and a history of symptoms
consistent with a rickettsiosis was not found, and it is possible therefore, that R.
gravesii sp. nov. produces only asymptomatic infections.
Future work on rickettsiae in Western Australia will involve phenotypic
characterization of the novel species, further investigation of their epidemiology and
pathogenicity and an ongoing search for additional undiscovered species.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page ……………………………………………………………………………i
Declaration …………………………………………………………………………..ii
Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………...iii
Table of Contents ……………………………………………………………………vi
List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………….xii
List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………xiii
Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………xvi
CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1.1 ORDER RICKETTSIALES ………………………………………................... 1
1.1.1 Introduction ……………………………………………………...…………... 1
1.1.2 Taxonomy ……………………………………………………...……………...3
1.1.3 Epidemiology ………………………………………………...…….................4
1.1.3.1 The association between ectoparasites and rickettsiae...…..………………….6
1.1.3.2 Vertebrate hosts and the effects of rickettsial infection …..……………….....7
1.1.3.3 Public health significance of rickettsial infections ………..…………………..9
1.2 DIAGNOSIS OF RICKETTSIAL INFECTION …………………………....11
1.2.1 Serology ……………………………………………………...……………...11
1.2.2 Culture of rickettsiae………………………………………….……………...13
1.2.3 PCR detection of rickettsial DNA ……………………………… ………..…14
1.3 CHARACTERIZATION OF NOVEL RICKETTSIAE ……...……………..15
1.3.1 Antigenic and serological characterization ………………………………….15
1.3.2 Molecular-biological assays for identification…………………………….…16
vii
1.4 REVIEW OF RICKETTSIOSES ……………………………………….…...19
1.4.1 Typhus group ……………………………………………………………..…19
1.4.1.1 Epidemic typhus …………………………………………………..............…19
1.4.1.2 Murine/endemic typhus………………………………………….………...…19
1.4.2 Spotted fever group ……………………………………………...………..…21
1.4.2.1 Rocky Mountain spotted fever ………………………………..…………..…22
1.4.2.2 Mediterranean spotted fever ……………………………………..………….23
1.4.2.3 Queensland tick typhus ……………………………………………..……….23
1.4.2.4 Flinders Island spotted fever ……………………………………..……….…24
1.4.2.5 Rickettsia felis ……………………………………………………………….26
1.4.2.6 “Australian spotted fever” ………………………………………..…………27
1.4.2.7 Unidentified spotted fever group rickettsiae in Australia …………..………28
1.4.2.8 Other pathogenic spotted fever group rickettsiae …………………..………29
1.4.2.9 Rickettsiae of unknown pathogenicity ……………………………..………35
1.4.2.10 Non-pathogenic spotted fever group rickettsiae …………………..………36
1.4.3 Scrub typhus ………………………………………………………………….36
1.4.4 Bartonella spp…………………………………………………………..........39
1.5 OBJECTIVES …………………………………………………………………42
CHAPTER 2. COLLECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF ECTOPARA SITES
2.1 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………...45
2.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ……………………………………............45
2.2.1 Sample collection …………………………………………………….……45
2.2.2 Tick identification …………………………………………………………49
2.3 RESULTS ……………………………………………………………………50
2.4 DISCUSSION …………………………………………………………….......54
viii
CHAPTER 3. DETECTION OF RICKETTSIAE
3.1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………….….60
3.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ………………………………………..…..…61
3.2.1 Study design …………………………………………………………….........61
3.2.2 Ectoparasite identification …………………………………………………....62
3.2.3 Detection of rickettsial DNA using PCR ………………………………..........62
3.2.3.1 Extraction of DNA …………………………………………………………62
3.2.3.2 Screening PCR ………………………………………………………............62
3.2.3.3 PCR product detection methods …………………………………………..…64
3.2.4 Sequencing ………………………………………………………………….…65
3.2.4.1 Sequencing of gltA and ompA genes ………………………………………...65
3.2.4.2 Sequence analysis………………………………………………………….…67
3.3 RESULTS ……………………………………………………………………….67
3.3.1 Screening of ectoparasites ……………………………………………….…….67
3.3.2 Prevalence ……………………………………………………………………..69
3.3.3 Sequence similarities ……………………………………………………….…69
3.4 DISCUSSION …………………………………………………………………..72
3.4.1 Aetiology ……………………………………………………………………...72
3.4.2 Prevalence …………………………………………………………………..…73
3.4.3 Life cycle: vectors and vertebrate hosts ……………………………….............75
3.4.4 Geographical distribution ……………………………………………………...78
3.4.5 Zoonotic potential ……………………………………………………………..80
CHAPTER 4. CHARACTERIZATION OF RICKETTSIA spp. STRAIN BWI-1
4.1 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………….…82
4.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ……………………………………………….84
ix
4.2.1 Sample collection ……………………………………………………………..84
4.2.2 Cell culture ………………………………………………………………........84
4.2.3 Immunofluorescence assay ……………………………………………….......85
4.2.4 Sequencing ………………………………………………………………........86
4.2.5 Sequence analysis …………………………………………………………….88
4.3 RESULTS ………………………………………………………………………89
4.3.1 Sequence analysis …………………………………………………………….89
4.4 DISCUSSION ………………………………………………………………….97
CHAPTER 5. DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF NOVEL
RICKETTSIAE FROM YELLOW -FOOTED ANTECHINUS.
5.1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………..........102
5.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ………………………………………….......103
5.2.1 Sample collection ……………………………………………………...……..103
5.2.2 Ectoparasite identification ……………………………………………..…….103
5.2.3 Cell culture ……………………………………………………………...……103
5.2.4 DNA extraction…………………………………………………..…….......…103
5.2.5 PCR screening ………………………………………………………………..104
5.2.6 Sequencing …………………………………………………………………...104
5.2.7 Sequence analysis …………………………………………………………….105
5.3 RESULTS ………………………………………………………………………105
5.3.1 Prevalence ……………………………………………………………………105
5.3.2 Sequence similarities ……………………………………………………...….107
5.4 DISCUSSION ……………………………………………………………….....115
5.4.1 Aetiology ………………………………………………………………..........115
5.4.2 Ecology ………………………………………………………………………..117
x
CHAPTER 6. INVESTIGATING THE PATHOGENIC POTENTIAL OF
RICKETTSIA GRAVESII AND THE RISK FACTORS FOR ZOONOTIC
INFECTION.
6.1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………..120
6.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ………………………………………………...121
6.2.1 Study design ……………………………………………………………………121
6.2.2 Questionnaire design …………………………………………………………..122
6.2.3 Questionnaire administration …………………………………………………..122
6.2.4 Blood collection ………………………………………………………………..122
6.2.5 Analysis ………………………………………………………………………..123
6.3 RESULTS ……………………………………………………………………….124
6.3.1 Descriptive epidemiology ……………………………………………………..124
6.3.2 Analysis of questionnaire results …………………………………….………..127
6.4 DISCUSSION ………………………………………………………………….. 129
6.4.1 Review of major findings …………………………………………. ………….129
6.4.2 Limitations of the study …………………………………………….………… 131
6.4.3 Public health implications of the study ………………………….…………….133
6.4.4 Recommendations for further research ………………………………………..134
CHAPTER 7. GENERAL DISCUSSION
7.1 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………...……… 136
7.2 FINDINGS OF THE STUDY IN RELATION TO AIMS…….. ……………......136
7.3 FUTURE DIRECTIONS ………………………………………………………...141
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ……………………………………………...145
APPENDICES ………………………………………………………………………190
APPENDIX 1. ABREVIATIONS ………………………………………………….. 190
xi
APPENDIX 2. SAMPLE COLLECTION INSTRUCTIONS ……………………..192
APPENDIX 3. COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES …………………………193
APPENDIX 4. GENBANK ACCESSION NUMBERS …………………………...194
APPENDIX 5. GENBANK ACCESSION NUMBERS AND SEQUENCES OF THE
NOVEL STRAINS ……………………………………………………………….. 196
APPENDIX 6. MINIMUM EVOLUTION AND MAXIMUM PARSIMONY TREES
………………………………………………………………………………………199
APPENDIX 7. QUESTIONNAIRE ………………………………………………. 217
APPENDIX 8. RESULTS OF THE SEROSURVEY ……………………...………235
xii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1. Hosts from which tick species were collected in Western Australia, the
collection sites and the numbers of animals on which ticks were found…..……...…51
Table 2.2 Tick species reported in Western Australia …………………………….....55
Table 3.1. Tick samples collected from different hosts and locations in Western
Australia and their screening PCR status…………………..…………..…………….68
Table 3.2. Percentage gltA sequence similarity between the two strains identified in
this study and those of previously characterised Rickettsia spp……………………. 70
Table 3.3. Percentage ompA sequence similarity between the two strains identified in
this study and those of previously characterised Rickettsia spp. ……………………71
Table 4.1. . Primers used for PCR and sequencing of DNA from Ricketssia spp. strain
BWI-1.……………………………………………………………………………….87
Table 4.2 Conditions and the premix used for the PCR reactions amplifying Rickettsia
spp. BWI-1 DNA ,,,,,,…………………………………………………………..……88
Table 4.3. PCR cycling conditions used in all reactions …………………………….88
Table 4.5 The percentage similarity between Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 and the
previously characterized rickettsial species …………………………………………91
Table 5.1 Results of PCR screening of ticks and fleas collected from yellow-footed
antechinuses in Dwellingup, WA….………………………………………………..106
Table 5.2. Comparison of Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 and previously characterized
species of Rickettsia based on 3 genes ……………………………………….….....109
Table 5.3. Comparison of Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 and previously characterized
species of Bartonella based on gltA gene sequences …………………………...….110
xiii
Table 6.1 Description of the population of Barrow Island workers that responded to
the questionnaire……………………….……………………………………………126
Table 6.2 Summary of odds ratios for exposure variables versus rickettsial serology
………………………………………………………………………………………128
Table A.1 Rickettsial Genbank accession numbers………………………………..194
Table A.2 Bartonella sp. GenBank accession numbers …………………………...195
Table A.3 Titration results for the serology performed on respondents to the Barrow Island questionnaire…………………………………………………………………235
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Composite diagram of the life cycle of Rocky Mountain spotted fever,
Rickettsialpox, and murine typhus ………………………………………………........5
Figure 2.1. Native animal trapping on Barrow Island ……………………………….47
Figure 2.2. Tick on the ear of a burrowing bettong …………………………….……47
Figure 2.3 Map of Western Australia showing sample collection sites..…………….48
Figure 2.4 Map of southwest WA showing sample collection sites .………………..49
Figure 2.5. Dorsal view of Amblyomma triguttatum collected from a person on
Barrow Island ……………………………………………………………………......52
Figure 2.6. Ventral view of Haemophysalis ratti collected from a golden bandicoot on
Barrow Island ………………………………………………………………………..53
Figure 2.7. Dorsal view of Amblyomma limbatum collected from a common brushtail
possum on Barrow Island ……………………………………………………………53
xiv
Figure 2.8. Dorsal view of Ixodes antechini collected from a yellow-footed antechinus
in Dwellingup ………………………………………………………………………..54
Figure 2.9 A map of Western Australia demonstrating previously recorded
distribution of ticks collected in this study ………………………………..…….…..56
Figure 3.1 Distribution of the rickettsial isolates across WA ………………….…....79
Figure 4.1. Unrooted neighbour-joining tree based on 16S rRNA sequences
demonstrating the relationship between Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 and previously
characterised rickettsiae. …..………………………………………………………..92
Figure 4.2. Neighbour-joining tree based on gltA gene sequences demonstrating the
relationship between Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 and previously characterised rickettsiae..93
Figure 4.3. Neighbour-joining tree based on ompA gene sequences demonstrating the
relationship between Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 and previously characterised rickettsiae..94
Figure 4.4. Neighbour-joining tree based on ompB gene sequences demonstrating the
relationship between Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 and previously characterised rickettsiae..95
Figure 4.5. Neighbour-joining tree based on sca4 sequences demonstrating the
relationship between Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 and previously characterised rickettsiae..96
Figure 5.1. Acanthopsylla jordani, lateral view ……………………………………107
Figure 5.2. Neighbour-joining tree based on gltA sequences demonstrating the
relationship between Rickettsia sp. D-1 and previously characterised rickettsiae….111
Figure 5.3. Neighbour-joining tree based on ompA sequences demonstrating the
relationship between Rickettsia sp. D-1 and previously characterised rickettsiae …112
Figure 5.4. Neighbour-joining tree based on ompB sequences demonstrating the
relationship between Rickettsia sp. D-1 and previously characterised rickettsiae….113
Figure 5.5. Neighbour-joining tree of Bartonella spp. based on gltA sequences
demonstrating the relationship between Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 and previously
characterised Bartonella spp…………………………………………………... …..114
xv
Figure A.1. Minimum-evolution tree based on 16S rRNA sequences (R. gravesii)
………………………………………………………………………………………199
Figure A.2. Maximum-parsimony tree based on 16S rRNA sequences (R. gravesii)
…………………………………………………………………………………..…..200
Figure A.3. Minimum-evolution tree based on gltA sequences (R. gravesii) ……...201
Figure A.4. Maximum-parsimony tree based on gltA sequences (R. gravesii) ……202
Figure A.5. Minimum-evolution tree based on ompA sequences (R. gravesii) ……203
Figure A.6. Maximum-parsimony tree based on ompA sequences (R. gravesii) …..204
Figure A.7. Minimum-evolution tree based on ompB sequences (R. gravesii) …….205
Figure A.8. Maximum-parsimony tree based on ompB sequences (R. gravesii).......206
Figure A.9. Minimum-evolution tree based on sca4 sequences (R. gravesii) ……...207
Figure A.10 Maximum-parsimony tree based on sca4 sequences (R. gravesii) …...208
Figure A.11. Minimum-evolution tree based on gltA sequences (R. antechini) …...209
Figure A.12. Maximum-parsimony tree based on gltA sequences (R. antechini) ….210
Figure A.13. Minimum-evolution tree based on ompA sequences (R. antechini) ….211
Figure A.14 Maximum-parsimony tree based on ompA sequences (R. antechini)…212
Figure A.15 Minimum-evolution tree based on ompB sequences (R. antechini)......213
Figure A.16. Maximum-parsimony tree based on ompB sequences (R. antechini)
……………………………………………………………………………………...214
Figure A.17 Minimum-evolution tree based on gltA sequences (Bartonella sp. strain
Mu1)………………………………………………………………………..………215
Figure A.18 Maximum-parsimony tree based on gltA sequences (Bartonella sp. strain
Mu1) …………………………………………………………………. ……………216
xvi
I had a lot of help.
Thank you to my principal supervisor, Associate Professor Stan Fenwick for
obtaining funding, recruiting collaborators and for his infectious enthusiasm for the
project. Thanks also to my Murdoch co-supervisors, Associate Professor Ian
Robertson and Associate Professor Phillip Clark. Ian agreed to help despite being a
self-confessed molecular-biology sceptic, his presence on my supervisory panel was a
constant source of reassurance and thanks to Phil especially for his perceptive and
often amusing editing of my thesis. Thanks also to Dr Angus Cook, School of
Population Health, UWA who guided me closely through the analysis of the
questionnaire and Yazid Abdad, my fellow PhD candidate who kindly allowed me to
use his serology results in my analysis.
I am also eternally thankful to everyone at The Australian Rickettsial Reference
Laboratory. Thanks to my co-supervisor Dr John Stenos, colleague Dr Nathan
Unsworth and Chelsea Nyugen for their extensive knowledge of all things rickettsial.
John did a fantastic job of interstate supervising and Nathan performed much of the
initial culturing of the Western Australia rickettsiae while trying to pass on some of
his formidable skills to me. Thank you also to Dr Stephen Graves, the laboratory’s
director, who is such a knowledgeable and willing collaborator and who provided
such a catchy name for our novel rickettsia. Thank you to Gorgon, in
particular Russell Langdon for their interest in the project and for
contributing a great deal towards its funding.
Thank you to my wonderful friend Patchara Phuektes who introduced me to the
foreign world of the laboratory with unlimited patience. Thank you to Russ Hobbs for
helping me identify my ectoparasite samples and also to Dr Andrew Mikosa, Dr Peter
Spencer and Dr Ryan Jeffries who kindly helped me with the phylogenetic component
xvii
of my project. Dr Peter Adams also provided a lot of helpful advice. Thank you to Dr
Liam O’Connor, Dr Pierre-Edouard Fournier and Professor Didier Raoult for
allowing me to spend time in their laboratories.
Scientists from the Department of Environmental Conservation (formerly CALM)
especially Keith Morris and Tony Start, Kanyana Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre,
Damien Cancilla, Roberta Bencini, Harriet Mills and John Drummond were kind
enough to provide me with samples and thank you to Rod Armistead, Maggie Lilith
and Felicity Donaldson for letting me come on some very entertaining fieldtrips as
well.
I’m fairly certain that I couldn’t have gotten through this without all the moral support
and welcome distractions provided by my lovely friends Peter Wai’in and Maggie
Lilith. Thank you also for the companionship provided by my office mates: Kim,
Danka, Celia, Jordan and Nico, who usually let me win the war over the air
conditioner controls.
Thank you to my extra-curricular friends Karen, Emma, Leigh, Emma and Russell,
Megs and everyone in the UQ veterinary pathology department for not having the first
idea about what rickettsiae are and thank you to Judy and Jan for looking after me
while I was working in Victoria.
The largest chunk of my gratitude must go to my family for their unfaltering support,
especially my Mum who can always lessen the high drama that seems to accompany
all my life’s endeavours.
1
CHAPTER 1
LITERATURE REVIEW
1.1 ORDER RICKETTSIALES
1.1.1 Introduction
Rickettsioses represent some of the oldest recorded infectious diseases. Scrub typhus
was described in China in the 3rd century and it is suspected that epidemic typhus was
the cause of a plague described in Athens in the 5th century (Groves and Harrington,
1994; Raoult and Roux, 1997). More recently, the importance of rickettsiae as emerging
pathogens has also been highlighted (Raoult and Roux, 1997).
The genus Rickettsia is named after Howard Ricketts, a medical practitioner, trained in
pathology and microbiology, who was pivotal in the early investigation of Rocky
Mountain spotted fever (Rickettsia rickettsii) in 1906 and 1907. Ricketts was the first
person to identify what would later be classified as rickettsiae, describing them as
obligatory intracellular bacteria, a novel category of pathogen at the time. He also
developed laboratory methods for detecting the presence of rickettsiae in ecologic and
clinical samples and demonstrated the importance of ticks and the role of mammalian
hosts in the maintenance of Rickettsia rickettsii in nature (Walker, 2004).
The order Rickettsiales comprises short, rod-shaped, coccobacillary or pleomorphic
micro-organisms which are structurally and biochemically similar to Gram-negative
bacteria. They are obligate intracellular parasites requiring a host cell cytoplasm to
stabilise their unusually permeable cell membranes and to supply co-factors required for
2
metabolism. They are found not within a phagosome or phagolysosome but lie in free
contact with the host cell cytoplasm (Winkler, 1990; Munderloh and Kurtti, 1995).
Rickettsiae range in size from 0.8 to 2.0 micrometres in length and 0.3 to 0.5
micrometres in diameter (La Scola and Raoult, 1997). The rickettsial envelope consists
of an inner cytoplasmic membrane, a trilaminar cell wall and a microcapsular layer
present on the outside of the outer leaflet of the cell wall (Silverman and Wisseman,
1978; Yano et al., 2004). Internally, rickettsiae have ribosomes and a small genome
consisting of a single circular chromosome, but lack a discrete nucleus (Raoult and
Roux, 1997; Yano et al., 2004). Rickettsiae are able to function with a small amount of
genetic material due to their obligate intracellular nature and their reliance on the host
cell for many compounds rather than having to synthesise them. This small genome is
thought to be the result of a reductive evolutionary process from an ancestral genome of
a larger size (Andersson and Andersson, 1999; Harrison and Gerstein, 2002; Renesto et
al., 2005). Rickettsiae replicate by binary fission in the host cell cytoplasm (Yano et al.,
2004).
The precise origin of rickettsiae remains uncertain. Rickettsiae and the eukaryotic cell
mitochondria may have evolved from a common ancestor because many DNA
sequences are shared (Weisburg et al., 1985; Emelyanov, 2003, 2003a). An alternative
theory suggests that rickettsiae may have evolved from free-living bacteria (Roux et al.,
1997). The “original” rickettsiae are thought to have parasitised invertebrate host cells
and when vertebrates appeared on Earth both the invertebrates and rickettsiae
subsequently adapted to become parasites on the vertebrate newcomers. This highly
successful adaptation allowed cycling of the organisms between invertebrates and
3
vertebrates and accounts for the widespread dispersal of rickettsiae into many
ecological systems today (Graves, 1998).
1.1.2 Taxonomy
The original taxonomy of rickettsiae described in Bergey’s Manual of Systematic
Bacteriology (1939) divided the order Rickettsiales into three families: Rickettsiaceae,
Bartonellaceae and Anaplasmataceae. The family Rickettsiaceae was further divided
into the tribes Rickettsieae, Ehrlicheae and Wolbachieae, with the tribe Rickettsieae
being subdivided into three genera: Coxiella, Rickettsia and Rochalimea (La Scola
and Raoult, 1997).
Molecular taxonomic methods have demonstrated that this classification is not the
most appropriate one. Substantial revision has subsequently occurred and members of
the order are now placed into subgroups of Proteobacteria based on their 16S rRNA
gene sequences. The genus Rickettsia has been placed into the α-1 subgroup and the
genus Rochalimaea has been combined with the genus Bartonella and placed into the
α-2 subgroup (La Scola and Raoult, 1997).
Initially, species within the genus Rickettsia were divided into two biogroups, the
typhus group (TG) and the spotted fever group (SFG). This distinction was made
based on the particular species’ intracellular position and optimal growth temperature
and the cross reaction of sera from an infected patient with somatic antigens of three
strains of Proteus (Raoult and Roux, 1997). More recently however, it has been
suggested that two species, Rickettsia bellii and Rickettsia canadensis, represent a
phylogenetic line that predates the typhus-spotted fever group split. They have
4
subsequently been placed into a third “ancestral group” (Stothard et al., 1994). At
present the typhus group contains the species Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia
prowazekii and the spotted fever group contains R. rickettsii, R. conorii, R. africae, R.
sibirica, R. slovaca, R. honei, R. japonica, R. australis, R. akari, R. felis, R.
aeschlimannii, R. helvetica, R. massiliae, R. rhipicephali, R. montanensis, R. parkeri
and R. peacockii. In addition to these species, there are many isolates that have not yet
been fully characterized which may represent new species (Fournier et al., 2003).
Rickettsia tsutsugamushi has been recognised as being distinct from other members of
the genus Rickettsia warranting its own genus (also in the α-1 subgroup of
Proteobacteria) designated Orientia to reflect the geographic distribution of scrub
typhus throughout the Orient (Raoult and Roux, 1997; Graves, 1998) .
Coxiella burnetii has also been shown to be distinct from other rickettsiae. It has been
demonstrated that its 16S rRNA sequence shows greater similarity to members of the
γ-subgroup of Proteobacteria, within which it is now placed (La Scola and Raoult,
1997). It is no longer considered a rickettsia by many authorities (Graves, 1998).
Despite this taxonomy, the classification of the order Rickettsiales continues to be
reassessed as new data becomes available (Parola et al., 2005).
1.1.3 Epidemiology
Rickettsial life cycles are complex and often involve a wide range of vectors,
vertebrate hosts and modes of transmission (figure 1.1).
5
Figure 1.1. Composite diagram of the life cycle of Rocky Mountain spotted fever,
rickettsialpox, and murine typhus.
A. life cycle of Rickettsia rickettsii in its tick and mammalian hosts; B. life cycle of Rickettsia akari;
and C. life cycle of Rickettsia typhi (Azad and Beard, 1998).
6
1.1.3.1 The association between ectoparasites and rickettsiae
Ectoparasites play an integral role in rickettsial life-cycles and much of the
rickettsiae’s ability to survive and propagate can be attributed to their association with
ectoparasites. Rickettsial diseases can be maintained in silent ectoparasite transovarial
and transstadial cycles for many years and re-emerge as epidemics when conditions
are favourable (Walker and Fishbein, 1991; Azad and Beard, 1998). The ectoparasite
acts as a vector, reservoir and/or amplifier and, with a few exceptions (eg.
Dermacentor andersoni infected with R. rickettsii and Pediculus hominis corporis
infected with R. prowazekii), does not appear to be adversely affected by the infection
(Raoult and Roux, 1997; Azad and Beard, 1998; Parola et al., 2005).
The ecology of the invertebrate host determines many of the epidemiological features
of the associated rickettsial infections. Influential ecological factors include favoured
environment, host specificity and feeding behaviour of the ectoparasite, and these in
turn can affect geographical and seasonal distribution, occurrence of zoonotic disease
and the number of vertebrate hosts one ectoparasite can infect. It has been speculated
that any rickettsial species found in an ectoparasite capable of biting humans should
be considered a potential human pathogen (Raoult and Roux, 1997; Azad and Beard,
1998).
Rickettsiae infect ectoparasites through one of two routes: 1. When the ectoparasite
feeds on a rickettsaemic host. 2. Through transovarial transmission from an infected
female ectoparasite to her offspring. Rickettsiae initially infect the ectoparasite’s gut,
predominantly in the midgut region, before entering the haemolymph of the
ectoparasite’s circulatory system and spreading systemically. Rickettsiae infect and
7
multiply in almost all organs of their invertebrate hosts following infection. If the
ovaries of the ectoparasite become infected, rickettsiae can be transmitted to the
ectoparasite’s offspring. A small proportion of the rickettsiae may persist in the tick’s
gut when it moults to form subsequent life stages, described as transstadial
transmission. As immature stages of an arthropod are often less host-specific than
adults, this must be taken into account when considering incidence and host-
specificity of the infecting rickettsiae (Reháček, 1989; Munderloh and Kurtti, 1995;
Raoult and Roux, 1997).
Transmission to a vertebrate host can occur through inhalation or wound inoculation
with infected ectoparasite faeces; however, when rickettsiae infect the ectoparasite’s
salivary gland then transmission can also occur via the ectoparasite’s bite. This is the
most common route of infection for SFG rickettsiae (Raoult and Roux, 1997; Azad
and Beard, 1998).
Ixodid (“hard-bodied ticks”) plus other species of ticks are the arthropod vectors
associated with spotted fever group rickettsiae (except the mite-borne R. akari) and
Coxiella burnetii. Fleas are the vectors of R. typhi, R. felis and Bartonella henselae.
Mites are the vectors of R. akari and Orientia tsutsugamushi and lice are the vectors
of R. prowazekii (Raoult and Roux, 1997; Azad and Beard, 1998).
1.1.3.2 Vertebrate hosts and the effects of rickettsial infection
The range of vertebrate hosts that may be infected by a specific rickettsia depends
largely on the host-specificity of the ectoparasite vector. For example, the human
body louse (Pediculus hominis corporis), the vector of R. prowazekii, is very host-
8
specific whereas Amblyomma species, which transmit R. africae, will bite almost any
mammal (Kelly et al., 1994; Raoult and Roux, 1997).
Most vertebrate hosts have a clinically inapparent infection and do not remain
rickettsaemic for long periods of time, however even this brief period is usually long
enough for them to serve as significant reservoirs of infection for ectoparasites (Kelly
et al., 1992a). Rickettsia prowazekii, the aetiological agent of epidemic typhus, is an
example of a rickettsia that causes a clinically apparent infection in its human
vertebrate host. Epidemic typhus is the only rickettsiosis in which humans are the
natural host, infection causes disease and then the rickettsiae sequester in the person.
The latent infection can be re-activated (Brill-Zinsser disease) and the subsequent
rickettsaemia will provide a source of infection for lice (Azad and Beard, 1998).
Rickettsia rickettsii has been reported to produce a disease in its canine host
characterized by fever, depression and anorexia, neurological signs, scrotal erythema
and rash, ecchymoses, epistaxis and death (Kelly et al., 1992a; Paddock et al., 2002).
It has been suggested that R. conorii is also capable of causing disease in dogs,
however, artificial infection failed to produce conclusive clinical signs (Kelly et al.,
1992a).
Native and feral animals are of major importance in the epidemiology of many
zoonotic diseases and their role in rickettsial life cycles should be taken into account
when considering the zoonotic risk, control and prevention of specific diseases
(Reháček and Tarasevich, 1991; Webster and Macdonald, 1995; Richards et al., 1997;
Ibrahim et al., 1999; Parola et al., 2003; Kruse et al., 2004). Rickettsiae are
9
effectively maintained in silent sylvatic cycles, and, as reservoir hosts, wild animals
are important in the transmission of infection to domestic animals and humans when
the opportunity arises. There is increasing interaction between the domestic and
sylvatic life cycles as the human population expands and encroaches on previously
undisturbed habitats, making vector-borne zoonotic diseases with wildlife reservoirs
increasingly significant as emerging infectious diseases (Kruse et al., 2004).
Wildlife have been shown to be significant in many rickettsial life cycles. In the
U.S.A. for example, R. felis and R. typhi have been found to be present in
Ctenocephalides felis fleas infecting opossums. The infection in this sylvatic cycle
can enter the domestic cat-flea cycle when the opossums begin to scavenge around
houses in suburban environments (Sorvillo et al., 1993; Boostrom et al., 2002). There
is also evidence in the U.S.A. that flying squirrels are able to act as non-human
reservoirs of Rickettsia prowazekii, and small mammals such as chipmunks, voles,
ground squirrels and rabbits have been identified as reservoirs of Rickettsia rickettsii
(Lane et al., 1981; Raoult and Roux, 1997; Niebylski et al., 1999). In Australia, the
bandicoot has been identified as a reservoir host in the life cycle of Rickettsia
australis and Orientia tsutagamushi (Campbell and Domrow, 1974; Raoult and Roux,
1997).
1.1.3.3 Public health significance of rickettsial infections
Humans are accidental hosts for all rickettsiae other than Rickettsia prowazekii. While
infection in the natural vertebrate host is usually inapparent, human infection can
result in clinical disease ranging from mild to severe.
10
Members of the family Rickettsiaceae have an affinity for endothelial cells. After an
arthropod bite, rickettsiae initially infect an undetermined cell type before spreading
via the lymphatic vessels to regional lymph nodes and then to the blood stream. A
short period of rickettsaemia follows before they infect and then multiply in the
endothelial lining of small arteries, veins and capillaries. Lysis of the host cell
membrane follows infection. The resulting vasculitis leads to increased vascular
permeability, oedema, hypovolaemia and hypotension (Raoult and Roux, 1997; Díaz-
Montero et al., 2001; Wilson et al., 2002).
The clinical consequences of rickettsioses range from asymptomatic infections to
severe and fatal disease syndromes. The main clinical signs of acute rickettsial
infection are non-specific and influenza-like. Fever, headache and malaise usually
occur, with or without a rash. The gastrointestinal system can also be involved,
resulting in nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea (La Scola and Raoult, 1997; Parola et al.,
2005). In many instances there is an eschar at the site of the ectoparasite bite which
starts as a raised, red papule that becomes a vesicle before it ruptures, the centre then
becomes dark purple and then black (Andrew et al., 1946). The course of the disease
is usually 2 to 3 weeks (Raoult and Roux, 1997). Occasionally complications such as
respiratory, cardiac, neurological, hepatic and renal abnormalities can result (Chi et
al., 1997; Bernabeu-Wittel et al., 1998; Araki et al., 2002; Parola et al., 2005).
Rickettsioses are often not recognised due to their similar clinical manifestation to
many other diseases, including measles, chicken pox, unspecified viral exanthema,
dengue fever and leptospirosis. Due to the non-specific clinical signs, the often mild
course of the diseases, and their transient nature, rickettsioses often go unrecognised
11
and unreported (Sexton et al., 1990; Walker and Fishbein, 1991; Azad and Beard,
1998; Graves 1998). It is estimated that undiagnosed cases of murine typhus exceed
reported cases by a factor of four to one (Azad, 1990).
1.2 DIAGNOSIS OF RICKETTSIAL INFECTIONS There are many serological, molecular and culture-based techniques available for the
diagnosis of rickettsial infections. When deciding which particular diagnostic test to
use, factors such as specimen type, access to equipment and expertise, sensitivity and
specificity required and whether the results will be used for clinical or research
purposes must be taken into account.
1.2.1 Serology
Serology is widely used to diagnose rickettsial illness however it has the limitation of
only being useful diagnostically when Rickettsia-specific antibodies can be
demonstrated. In most cases these antibodies are not produced for a week or more
following infection by which time the patient has often recovered or died. There have
also been cases where rickettsioses, definitively diagnosed by other means have
produced no increase in antibody titre during or even after the illness (Fournier et al.,
2005). Another limitation of some serological tests is their lack of specificity due to
the presence of cross-reacting antibodies which occur between biogroups (SFG and
TG), between species and with Legionella and Proteus species. Most of the
serological tests currently used for diagnosis however, are Rickettsia-specific.
Serology is a very useful tool in epidemiological studies however, as antibodies,
particularly IgG, will persist in vertebrate hosts for a long time after infection has
passed (Walker and Dumler, 1995; La Scola and Raoult, 1997).
12
The Weil-Felix serological test was one of the first assays developed for the diagnosis
of rickettsial infections. It was used to detect antibodies to various Proteus species
which contain antigens that cross-react with members of the genus Rickettsia (except
R. akari). This test is poorly sensitive and not Rickettsia-specific and it is only useful
for a short period of time following infection as it detects principally IgM antibodies.
It is rarely used now as it has been superseded by more sophisticated techniques with
the advent of improved serological tests and methods of culturing the micro-
organisms (Hechemy et al., 1979; Raoult and Dasch, 1989; La Scola and Raoult,
1997).
The more recently developed serological tests rely on anti-rickettsial
antibody/rickettsial antigen interactions for the identification of current or historical
disease. These tests include the complement fixation (CF), indirect haemagglutination
and latex agglutination tests, the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA),
indirect immunofluorescence test (IF) and western blotting. The test of choice for the
serodiagnosis of rickettsial infection however is the IF test (La Scola and Raoult,
1997; Graves, 1998). The sensitivity of the IF is 94-100% and the specificity can be
up to 100% depending on the cut-off titre selected (Walker and Dumler, 1995; Parola
et al., 2005).
Species-specific monoclonal antibodies and western blot immunoassays have also
been used to identify the aetiology of SFG rickettsiae infections in epidemiological
surveys and are particularly valuable when more than one pathogenic rickettsiae is
13
known to occur in a region (Raoult and Dasch, 1989; Raoult et al., 1994; Xu et al.,
1997).
1.2.2 Culture of rickettsiae
Culture is used to isolate rickettsiae from clinical samples. Tick, amphibian and
mammalian cell lines such as L-929, Vero, BGM, HeLa, XTC, human embryonic
lung and primary chick embryo cells may be used for growing rickettsiae. As
rickettsiae cannot grow in the presence of most antibiotics, strict attention must be
paid to aseptic technique to avoid contamination with bacteria that will overgrow
rickettsiae. Rickettsiae have relatively slow growth rates, with an average doubling
time of 10 hours. Species of rickettsiae differ in their growth characteristics, such as
optimal growth temperature, time until plaque formation and favoured cell-line, and
exhibit a range of cytopathic effects in cell cultures (Baird et al., 1992; Walker and
Dumler, 1995; Raoult and Roux, 1997; Simser et al., 2001).
Culturing of most Rickettsia spp. presents a degree of risk to laboratory personnel as
infection can be acquired through accidental parenteral inoculation or through
exposure to infectious aerosols. In 1976 there were 63 reported cases of laboratory
aquired infection with Rickettsia ricketsii, 11 of these were fatal. To minimise the risk
of infection, it is generally recommended that culture of Rickettsia spp. is undertaken
in physical containment 3 (PC3) facilities (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/msds-
ftss/msds129e.html). The development of non-culture techniques is therefore
desirable due to these requirements and risk posed to personnel.
14
1.2.3 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of rickettsial DNA
The use of PCR and its application in the diagnosis of rickettsioses has alleviated the
need for fresh or frozen specimens and for difficult and hazardous culture procedures
(Tzianabos et al., 1989; Azad et al., 1990; Carl et al., 1990; Sexton et al., 1994).
Unlike serology, no reference sera are required (Webb et al., 1990; Raoult and Roux,
1997); as many rickettsial genes are highly conserved, DNA for positive controls can
be extracted from generic continuous cell cultures. PCR, in conjunction with DNA
sequencing, is more specific than most other diagnostic tests, however traditional
PCR has low sensitivity when used to detect organisms in commonly collected
specimens such as sera and whole blood as the rickettsaemia is transient and there are
often low concentrations of circulating organisms. A highly sensitive and specific
real-time PCR assay has recently been developed by Stenos et al. (2005). This assay
is capable of detecting 1 SFG rickettsia per PCR reaction. Traditional PCR is more
sensitive when used for clinical specimens such as cerebrospinal fluid, lymphocytes
and skin biopsies (Reynolds et al., 2003).
PCR assays using primers to detect a number of rickettsial genes have been
described. These include the 16S rRNA gene (Wilson et al., 1990), the 17 kilodalton
antigen gene (Anderson and Tzianabos, 1989), the citrate synthase gene gltA (Roux et
al., 1997), genes for outer membrane proteins rOmpB (Sekeyová et al., 2001) and
rOmpA for spotted fever group rickettsiae (Roux et al., 1996; Bouyer et al., 2001), the
groEL gene which encodes for a 60 kilodalton heat shock protein (Lee et al., 2003)
and sca4 (formerly ‘gene D’) which encodes for the PS120 protein (Sekeyova et al.,
2001). None of these PCR reactions are species-specific however and PCR products
15
must be analysed further by sequencing of amplicons in order that a particular species
can be identified (Raoult and Roux, 1997).
1.3 CHARACTERIZATION OF NOVEL RICKETTSIAE Due to their obligatory intracellular nature rickettsiae express few of the phenotypic
and biochemical characteristics traditionally used for bacterial taxonomy, therefore
other methods of characterization must be utilized (Raoult and Roux, 1997). In the
past, rickettsial isolates were classified into the SFG, TG or scrub typhus group based
on the cross reactions of patient’s sera with somatic antigens of strains of Proteus
(Raoult et al., 2005). Phenotypic criteria such as arthropod vector, pathogenicity,
geographical distribution of the strain, optimal culture temperature, plaque formation,
growth in embryonic chicken eggs and haemolytic activity have also been used to
characterize rickettsial strains (Raoult et al., 2005).
1.3.1 Antigenic and serological characterization
Until the mid-1980s, micro-immunofluorescence using polyclonal mouse sera and
monoclonal antibody serotyping were the reference methods for identifying new
rickettsiae (Philip et al., 1978; Raoult et al., 2005). Comparison of proteins by sodium
dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western
immunoblotting were also performed so that a novel isolate’s antigenic profile and
phylogenetic position could be examined in relation to previously characterized
rickettsiae. These techniques primarily targeted the proteins rOmpA and rOmpB,
which contain species-specific epitopes. The assays were often difficult to perform
and time-consuming and had the drawback of only being possible in a specialised
reference laboratory as physical containment level 3 (PC3) clearance is required for
16
the cultivation of rickettsiae; laboratory animal housing, a large panel of specific
antisera and appropriately trained staff are also pre-requisites (Bouyer et al., 2001;
Parola and Raoult, 2001a). Although the recent advent of molecular taxonomic
methods has provided an alternative to serological assays, they can still be used to
provide valuable information about rickettsial relationships and novelty (Philip et al.,
1978; Beati et al., 1992; Walker et al., 1995; Xu et al., 1997; Xu and Raoult, 1998).
These methods have also become more accessible recently with the development of
new culture techniques providing a reliable source of antigens for the assays
(Eremeeva et al., 1995; Walker et al., 1995; La Scola and Raoult, 1997; Fang and
Raoult, 2003).
1.3.2 Molecular-biological assays for identification
Genotypic approaches for identifying rickettsiae are being increasingly employed,
characteristically providing more objective and definitive information than serotyping
(Parola et al., 2005), however criteria for the taxonomic definition of novel rickettsial
isolates are still under consideration (Raoult and Roux, 1997).
It has been proposed that rickettsiae experience less evolutionary pressures than most
convential bacterial species due to their small genome size and strict intracellular
nature; these factors result in a low rate of mutation and the 70% DNA-DNA
relatedness cut off used to describe conventional bacterial species does not therefore
adequately differentiate between rickettsiae. Using this criterion, all the members of
the SFG would be classed as a single species, even though they have different
17
ecologies and produce distinct diseases (Stenos et al., 1998; Fournier et al., 2003;
Renesto et al., 2005).
In 2003, Fournier et al. described a set of objective guidelines for the classification of
new rickettsial isolates at various taxonomic levels, including genus, group and
species, based on sequences from selected genes. While rickettsial taxonomy remains
an evolving and controversial field, their criteria are now widely used.
The panbacterial 16S rRNA gene has been used extensively to differentiate bacterial
species however, it demonstrates minimal variation across the range of rickettsial
species, so significant inferences about intra-genus phylogeny are not possible
(Weisburg et al., 1991; Roux and Raoult, 1995). The citrate synthase encoding gene
(gltA) has been shown to mutate more rapidly than other rickettsial genes and
therefore provides a more sensitive tool for analysing phylogenetic relationships
(Roux et al., 1997). One of the outer membrane protein encoding genes, ompA, is
specific for spotted fever group rickettsiae and is relatively divergent between
members of the group (Fournier et al., 1998). An additional outer membrane protein
(ompB) (Roux and Raoult, 2000) and sca4 (which codes for the PS-120 protein)
(Sekeyová et al., 2001) are common to both typhus and spotted fever group rickettsiae
and are also used in the taxonomic definition of a novel isolate (La Scola and Raoult,
1997; Fournier et al., 2003). Analysis of these genes concurs with recommendations
made by the Ad Hoc Committee for the Re-evaluation of the Species Definition of
Bacteriology that a minimum of five genes should be sequenced when characterising
a new isolate (Fournier et al., 2003).
18
Fournier et al. (2003) recommend that in order to be classified as a member of the
genus Rickettsia an isolate should be 98.1% similar to 16S rRNA genes and 86.5%
similar to citrate synthase genes from any of the 20 Rickettsia species studied
previously. A member of the typhus group should fulfil at least two of the following
four criteria: nucleotide sequence similarities with 16S rRNA, citrate synthase, ompB
and sca4 genes of either Rickettsia typhi or Rickettsia prowazekii of ≥ 99.4, ≥ 96.6, ≥
92.4, ≥ 91.6% respectively. A member of the spotted fever group should either
possess the ompA gene or fulfil at least two of the following criteria: nucleotide
sequence similarities with 16S rRNA, citrate synthase, ompB and sca4 genes of any
other member of this group of ≥ 98.8, ≥ 92.7, ≥ 85.8 and 82.2% respectively.
To be classified as a new Rickettsia species, an isolate should not exhibit more than
one of the following degrees of nucleotide similarity with the most homologous
validated species: ≥ 99.8 and 99.9% for the 16S rRNA and the citrate synthase genes
respectively and when amplifiable, ≥ 98.8, 99.2 and 99.3% for the ompA, ompB and
sca4 genes respectively. The suitability of this classification scheme was confirmed
by the study of isolates in vitro (Fournier et al., 2003).
In addition, it has recently been proposed that bacterial isolates that do not qualify for
separate species status based on this criteria can be considered distinct subspecies if
they have differing serotypic and epidemio-clinical characteristics. This proposal
applies to members of the R. conorii species: “R. conorii subsp. conorii subsp. nov.”,
“R. conorii subsp. indica subsp. nov.”, “R. conorii subsp. caspia subsp. nov” and “R.
conorii subsp. israelensis subsp. nov” (Philip et al., 1978; Parola et al., 2005; Zhu et
al. 2005).
19
1.4. REVIEW OF RICKETTSIOSES
1.4.1 Typhus group
1.4.1.1 Epidemic typhus
Epidemic typhus (R. prowazekii) is most frequently seen when conditions are
favourable for the proliferation of its vector, the human body louse. Poverty, lack of
hygiene and cold weather stimulates the close contact between people that supports
the transmission of epidemic typhus. Currently the disease is limited to North and
South America, Asia and Africa (Raoult and Roux, 1997; Raoult et al., 1997; Roux
and Raoult, 1999).
Epidemic typhus is the only rickettsiosis in which humans are the primary vertebrate
host. Once a person has contracted epidemic typhus they may retain a latent infection
for life. This can re-activate as Brill-Zinsser disease, a milder form of typhus, under
stressful conditions. The onset of typhus is usually acute. Patients present with high
fever, headaches and severe myalgia. A rash and pneumonia are also common. It is
fatal in 10 to 30% of patients depending on underlying diseases and nutritional status
(Raoult and Roux, 1997). There is evidence that flying squirrels are able to act as non-
human reservoirs of epidemic typhus as close contact with these animals or exposure
to their nests, dander or ectoparasites has been linked to most cases of sporadic
epidemic typhus occurring in the United States (Reynolds et al., 2003).
1.4.1.2 Murine/endemic typhus
The agent of murine typhus, Rickettsia typhi, is closely related to R. prowazekii but
the epidemiology, including mode of transmission and the clinical diseases produced
20
are quite different (Wheatland, 1926; Hone, 1927; Fournier et al., 2003). In contrast to
epidemic typhus, murine typhus is more prevalent in warmer countries and it is
generally a milder disease (Raout and Roux, 1997). The natural hosts of R. typhi are
rats and mice, although other rodents and even other mammals such as shrews,
skunks, opossums and cats have been shown to be capable of acting as vertebrate
hosts (Azad, 1990). The natural invertebrate vectors are rodent fleas (Xenopsylla
cheopis, Nosopsylla fasciatus and Leptopsylla segnis). Rickettsia typhi has also been
isolated from the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis (Azad and Beard, 1998) but the
significance of this vector in the transmission cycle remains unclear. The rickettsia
infects the gut and is excreted in the faeces of the flea, with the most common mode
of transmission believed to be by inhalation of infected flea faeces. Infection via
wound contamination with flea faeces or through flea bites can also occur (Azad,
1990; Graves, 1998). Murine typhus is most prevalent in warmer countries, with most
reports occurring in the USA, Africa, Europe and Asia (Raoult and Roux, 1997).
Dr Frank Hone, a general practitioner and the Chief Quarantine Officer for South
Australia recognised an outbreak of acute “typhus-like illness” in waterside workers
in 1922 (Hone, 1922; 1923; 1927). He was the first person to describe murine typhus
and the first person to suspect a non-ectoparasite mode of transmission for a typhus-
like disease. The causative micro-organism, named Rickettsia mooseri at the time,
was later identified by scientists working at the United States Public Health Service
(Burnet, 1942; Stewart, 1991). By the 1930s the association of the disease with rodent
contact was established and in 1942 inhalation of dust containing infected flea faeces
was suggested as the mode of transmission by FM Burnet (Burnet, 1942; O'Connor et
al., 1996).
21
After the initial outbreak in Adelaide described by Dr Hone, Wheatland described a
“typhus-like fever” in farm workers in the Toowoomba district of Queensland where a
rodent plague had preceded the outbreak in the human hosts (Wheatland, 1926).
Murine typhus also occurred in Western Australia with 1332 cases notified between
1927 and 1952, resulting in 50 deaths, mainly amongst the elderly. The main foci of
infection were Perth and Fremantle although cases occurred as far north as Geraldton
and as far south as Albany (Saint et al., 1954). Another outbreak in the Toowoomba
area in Queensland was described between 1948 and 1959, when 44 cases occurred
(Derrick and Pope, 1960; O'Connor et al., 1996). The geographical range of murine
typhus in Australia was recently expanded after a human case was reported from
Geelong, Victoria (Jones et al., 2004).
Murine typhus is probably endemic Australia-wide and cases are documented
occasionally; such as the cluster of six cases occurring in Albany, Western Australia
between 1995 and 1996 (Forbes et al., 1991; Graves et al., 1992; Kelly et al, 1995;
O'Connor et al., 1996; Graves, 1998; Beaman and Marinovitch, 1999). However,
what was once a common disease is now quite rare, perhaps because of effective rat
and mouse control programmes (Saint et al., 1954; Dwyer et al., 1991). Failure to
recognise and report cases may result in under-recognition of murine typhus as a
human disease (Forbes et al., 1991).
1.4.2 Spotted fever group
The use of new culture techniques and molecular biological tools has led to an
increase in the identification of novel SFG rickettsiae over the past 20 years. Spotted
22
fever group rickettsiae are widely distributed, occurring on every continent other than
Antarctica (Parola et al., 2005).
1.4.2.1 Rocky Mountain spotted fever
Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) was first reported in 1899 (Parola et al., 2005)
and first described in 1904 in an article published by Wilson and Chowning in the
first volume of “The Journal of Infectious Diseases”. The authors were investigating
the high incidence of cases of an often fatal “spotted fever” occurring on the western
side of the Bitterroot River, Western Montana. In their initial investigation they
identified an increased incidence of cases in the spring and a lack of communicability
between people. They identified outdoor activities as being a risk factor for infection
and hypothesised that transmission might have occurred following tick bites and that
Colombian ground squirrels might have played a role in the life cycle of the infectious
agent (Walker, 2004).
Rocky Mountain spotted fever (R. rickettsii) is believed to be the most clinically
severe of the SFG rickettsioses. Without treatment, infection in people can lead to
severe systemic manifestations, including pneumonitis, myocarditis, hepatitis, renal
failure, encephalitis, gangrene and a case-fatality rate as high as 30%. Even with
treatment, hospitalisation rates of 72% and case-fatality rates of 4% have been
reported (Levy et al., 2004). Infections can also be lethal in young and previously
healthy patients. Rickettsia rickettsii has been recovered from various anthropophilic
(attracted to humans) tick genera including Amblyomma, Dermacentor and
Rhipicephalus spp., which have a wide range of domestic and wild animal vertebrate
hosts. Rickettsia rickettsii is also atypical in that it can produce a clinically apparent
23
infection, characterized by fever, neurological signs, scrotal erythema and rash, in its
canine vertebrate host (Paddock et al., 2002). It occurs in areas of Canada, and North,
Central and South America, where it is also the causative agent of Brazilian spotted
fever (Fuentes, 1986; Raoult and Roux, 1997; Galvão et al., 2003; Horta et al., 2004;
Schoeler et al., 2005).
1.4.2.2 Mediterranean Spotted Fever
Mediterranean spotted fever (MSF), caused by R. conorii, is also known as
“boutonneuse” fever and Kenyan tick typhus. This disease occurs all around the
Mediterranean coast, in sub-Saharan Africa, India, around the Black Sea and in the
eastern part of Russia. It is more common in summer. Typically, MSF has a similar
but milder presentation than Rocky Mountain spotted fever with mortality rates of
approximately 2.5%. The disease is most often characterized by a single eschar and a
generalized macropapular rash that may involve the palms and the soles.
Rhipicephalus spp. act as the vector and dogs, which are the preferred hosts of this
tick species, may also be utilised by the rickettsiae as reservoirs (Tinelli et al., 1989;
Raoult and Roux, 1997; Antón et al., 2003; Rutherford et al., 2004).
1.4.2.3 Queensland tick typhus
Queensland tick typhus (QTT), caused by R. australis, was initially recognised in
1946, with many of the first cases observed among Australian troops training in the
bush of northern Queensland (Mathew, 1938; Andrew et al., 1946; Brody, 1946; Plotz
et al., 1946; Raoult and Roux, 1997). Antibodies were detected in bandicoots and
rodents in serological studies of vertebrate reservoirs (Fenner, 1946; Campbell and
24
Domrow, 1974; Raoult and Roux, 1997) and Rickettsia australis was isolated from
Ixodes holocyclus and I. tasmani in 1974 (Campbell and Domrow, 1974).
After the initial identification of the disease in north-eastern Queensland, QTT was
found to occur in southern Queensland and New South Wales and subsequently down
the eastern coast of Australia to Gippsland in Victoria (Streeten et al., 1948; Neilson,
1955; Pope, 1955; Knyvett and Sanders, 1964; Campbell et al., 1979; Dwyer et al.,
1991; Sexton et al., 1991; 1991a; Graves et al., 1993). Cases all occur on the eastern
side of the Great Dividing Range where rainfall is conducive to the survival of Ixodes
spp. ticks (Sexton et al., 1991; Hudson et al., 1993; Hudson et al., 1994; Ash and
Smithurst, 1995; Graves, 1998; Roberts et al., 2000). It has been estimated that 20
cases a year on average are seen by medical practitioners working in the northern
beaches region of Sydney (Russell, 2001) and there have been two fatal cases reported
to date (Sexton et al., 1990; Parola et al., 2005).
While many spotted fever group rickettsiae are genetically very similar, R. australis is
relatively distinct (Regnery et al., 1991). It has been demonstrated that R. australis is
the most evolutionarily distant rickettsia in the SFG, this divergence being especially
evident in the amino acid sequence of domain II of the ompA gene (Stenos and
Walker, 2000).
1.4.2.4 Flinders Island spotted fever
Flinders Island spotted fever (FISF), caused by R. honei, was first described in 1991
by Dr Robert Stewart, a general practitioner on the island. He had seen 26 cases of
this typical rickettsial disease, which occurred most often in the summer months and
25
which usually presented with a macropapular rash most obvious on the trunk and
limbs and more prominent centrally than on the periphery (Stewart, 1991). Initially it
was suspected that R. australis was the causative agent but the disease was slightly
different in presentation and epidemiology when compared to Queensland tick typhus
(Graves et al., 1991; Sexton et al., 1991a; Graves, 1998). The aetiological agent of
Flinders Island spotted fever was confirmed as a new species in 1992 when an isolate
was characterised, and it was named Rickettsia honei to honour Frank Sandland Hone
an early Australian rickettsiologist (Baird et al., 1996; Raoult and Roux, 1997; Stenos
et al., 1997).
In 2003, it was proposed that R. honei was the same aetiological agent as the rickettsia
that causes Thai Tick Typhus (TTT-118) (Graves and Stenos, 2003). This organism
had first been isolated from a pool of Ixodes and Rhipicephalus spp. larval ticks in
Thailand in 1962 and was identified as a human pathogen in 2005 (Kollars et al.,
2001; Jiang et al., 2005). In 1996, R. honei was also identified in Amblyomma
cajennense ticks parasitising cattle in Texas, USA making it the SFG rickettsia with
the widest recognized distribution to date (Graves and Stenos, 2003).
The tick Bothriocroton hydrosauri (formerly Aponomma hydrosauri), which has been
associated with reptiles such as blue tongue lizards, copperhead and tiger snakes has
been identified as an important vector of R. honei on Flinders Island. This was
confirmed after demonstration of the rickettsia in the ticks’ salivary glands,
malpighian tubules, midgut epithelial cells and oocytes (Stenos et al., 2003;
Whitworth et al., 2003). The range of R. honei was recently extended in Australia,
when cases of human disease were described from South Australia, and from
26
Schouten Island, south of the Freycinet Peninsula in Tasmania. Recently a R. honei-
like agent was detected in a Haemaphysalis tick collected from the Cape York
Peninsula in far north Queensland (Dyer et al., 2005; Lane et al., 2005; Unsworth et
al., 2005).
1.4.2.5 Rickettsia felis
In 1990, when cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) were being examined for the presence
of R. typhi using an electron microscope, a Rickettsia-like organism was observed in
the flea’s midgut (Adams et al., 1990). The agent was provisionally named the ELB
agent after the EL Laboratory (Soquel, California). After initial detection, the ELB
agent was identified in blood samples from opossums and their fleas in an area in
California where a rickettsia-like disease of humans had occurred (Williams et al.,
1992). In 1996, the ELB agent was renamed Rickettsia felis and it has subsequently
been identified as the cause of human disease in a number of locations including:
North and South America, Europe, Africa, New Zealand and along the Thai-Myanmar
border (Schriefer et al., 1994; Higgins et al., 1996; Zavala-Velazquez et al., 2000;
Bouyer et al., 2001; Raoult et al., 2001; La Scola et al., 2002a; Richter et al., 2002;
Parola et al., 2003; Kelly et al., 2004).
Rickettsia felis was initially placed within the typhus group of Rickettsia as it reacts
with antibodies of R. typhi and due to the historical association of members of the TG
with insects and SFG with acarines. However, data from more recent genetic and
antigenic studies, notably the presence of an ompA gene, place R. felis in the SFG
(Bouyer et al., 2001; Fang and Raoult, 2003). Further analysis of the 16S rRNA gene
placed R. felis in a clade with R. akari and R. australis. Assessment of the 17 kDa
27
protein demonstrated that R. felis is 11% divergent from the TG which corresponds
with the 10-12% divergence recognised previously between members of the SFG and
the TG (Bouyer et al., 2001). Rickettsia felis has been shown to be transmitted
horizontally and vertically in fleas (Fang and Raoult, 2003). In 2003, R. felis was also
detected in the ticks Haemaphysalis flava, H. kitasatoe and Ixodes ovatus in Japan.
However, the significance of ticks in the life cycle of R. felis is unknown at this stage
(Ishikura et al., 2003). The disease produced by R. felis is usually mild and similar to
murine typhus (Schoeler et al., 2005).
Following the outbreak of murine typhus cases in Albany, Western Australia in the
1990s, a survey was conducted using human serum from the south-west of Western
Australia and fleas from rats in Albany and from cats in Perth. No R. typhi DNA was
detected from the fleas but 10 out of 37 pools of fleas from the cats in Perth were
PCR/RFLP positive for R. felis infection, however, sequencing for confirmation of the
identification was not performed (Kilminster T. An Investigation of Typhus in
Western Australia. Honours Thesis: Department of Microbiology, University of
Western Australia; 1997). In 2004, R. felis was sequenced from flea samples
collected from various locations across Western Australia, providing definitive
evidence for its existence here (Schloderer et al., 2006). Rickettsia felis has not yet
been recorded from a human patient in Australia.
1.4.2.6 “Australian Spotted Fever”
Recently, seven cases of a SFG rickettsiosis caused by infection with the newly-
recognised rickettsia “R. marmionii” have been diagnosed from Queensland,
Tasmania and South Australia. Genotypic studies have demonstrated a close
28
relationship between R. marmionii and R. honei. Potential vectors include
Haemaphysalis novaeguineae (Graves et al., 2006).
1.4.2.7 Unidentified spotted fever group rickettsiae in Australia
Further evidence is available suggesting that there are other, as yet unidentified SFG
rickettsiae present in Australia. For example, a mild SFG rickettsiosis of people has
been recognised in northern Tasmania. This has been diagnosed serologically but no
isolation and characterization has occurred to date (Chin and Jennens, 1995; Graves,
1998). In addition, a survey performed in 1997 on serum samples collected from the
south west of Western Australia demonstrated that 42 out of 866 samples were
positive for SFG antibodies (Kilminster T. An Investigation of Typhus in Western
Australia. Honours Thesis: Department of Microbiology, University of Western
Australia; 1997). In 1999, a serosurvey performed on 920 non-randomly collected
serum samples from the Kimberley region of Western Australia (WA) demonstrated
that 15 out of 920 samples tested were positive for spotted fever group antibodies
(Graves et al., 1999).
Rickettsial infections have also been reported in both people travelling into Australia
and Australians travelling abroad. In 1988, two cases of Rickettsia conorii infection
were diagnosed in Perth, Western Australia. Both patients had recently returned from
Africa (Graves, 1998). A Japanese man who spent a short time on the Gold Coast,
Queensland in 2000 later developed symptoms consistent with a rickettsiosis, these
symptoms were thought to be associated with an Ixodes holocyclus bite. Western blot
analysis demonstrated reactivity of the serum to proteins specific for Rickettsia
helvetica however no further evidence for the presence of R. helvetica in Australia has
29
been reported (Inokuma et al., 2003). Until the current study, no native SFG
rickettsiae had been isolated in WA, however, cases have been defined serologically
(Dyer, pers. comm., 2006).
1.4.2.8 Other pathogenic spotted fever group rickettsiae
• Israeli spotted fever (Rickettsia conorii israelensis)
The agent of Israeli spotted fever (ISF) belongs to the R. conorii complex. It was first
isolated from ticks and humans in 1974, and it has been reported from Israel, Portugal
and Italy. The brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus, has been identified as the
most common vector of the organism. The Israeli spotted fever rickettsia is capable of
producing a life-threatening illness especially as treatment is often delayed as there is
usually no eschar present to assist with the diagnosis (Aharonowitz et al., 1999;
Bacellar et al., 1999; Giammanco et al., 2003).
• Astrakhan fever (Rickettsia conorii caspia)
The agent of Astrakhan fever (AF) was first described in 1991 in Astrakhan on the
Caspian Sea. It has since been detected in Africa and Kosovo. Astrakhan fever shows
a similar clinical presentation and seasonal distribution to MSF. Its clinical
presentation differs in that AF produces a milder disease, is yet to cause a fatality and
has a low rate of eschar formation. The suspected vectors are the dog ticks
Rhipicephalus pumilio and R. sanguineus (Tarasevich et al., 1991; Eremeeva et al.,
1994; Eremeeva et al., 1995; Rydkina et al., 1999; Parola and Raoult, 2001a; Parola
et al., 2005).
30
• African tick bite fever (R. africae)
African tick bite fever was first described in Mozambique and South Africa in 1911.
Although these and subsequent cases were generally thought to be MSF, there was
some debate as to whether tick bite fever could be caused by a distinct species based
on a different epidemiology and clinical presentation. This debate was not resolved
until 1990 when Kelly et al. isolated and characterized R. africae from the tick species
Amblyomma hebraeum (Parola et al., 2005).
Rickettsia africae is transmitted by Amblyomma hebraeum and A. variegatum and has
been reported from South and Central Africa and the West Indies. It usually produces
a mild, self-limiting disease with fever, multiple eschars, regional lymphadenopathy
and, rarely, a skin rash (Kelly et al., 1992; 1992a; Kelly et al., 1996; Parola et al.,
2001; Parola and Raoult, 2001a; Jensenius et al. 2003; Toutous-Trellu, 2003;
Rutherford et al., 2004; Kelly, 2006).
• Rickettsia sibirica mongolotimonae
This rickettsial species was isolated from Hyalomma asiaticum ticks in Mongolia and
was initially thought to be non-pathogenic. Later, R. sibirica mongolotimonae was
isolated from patients in southern France with fever, headache, an eschar,
lymphangitis and lymphadenopathy. This presentation led to the proposed naming of
the disease as “lymphangitis-associated rickettsiosis”. It has subsequently been
detected in Hyalomma truncatum ticks from cattle in sub-Saharan Africa (Parola et
al., 2001; Parola and Raoult, 2001a; Fournier et al., 2005).
31
• North Asian tick typhus (R. sibirica sibirica)
This rickettsiosis was first described in 1936 and has now been shown to occur
widely in Asiatic Russia. Disease occurs most often in summer and ranges from
asymptomatic to serious infections with complications such as pneumonia and sepsis.
The tick vectors of R. sibirica are Dermacentor spp. and Haemaphysalis spp. (Yu et
al., 1993; Xu et al., 1997; Chen et al., 1998; Rydkina et al., 1999; Lewin et al., 2003;
Parola et al., 2005).
• “Far Eastern Spotted Fever” (R. heilongjiangensis)
Rickettsia heilongjiangensis was first isolated from Dermacentor sylvarum ticks
collected in the Heilongjian Province of China in 1982. Subsequent serological
studies have confirmed that R. heilongjiangensis is the agent of a mild human
rickettsiosis that occurs in China and the Russian far east. Infections occur most
frequently at the end of June and July, in contrast to infections caused by R. sibirica
sibirica in the same geographical area, which occur more commonly at the end of
April and May (Zhang et al., 2000; Mediannikov et al., 2004). Haemaphysalis spp.
ticks are believed to be the vectors of this rickettsia (Parola et al., 2005).
• Rickettsialpox (R. akari)
Rickettsialpox, an asymptomatic to mild disease characterized by low-grade fever,
headache and a vesicular eruption over the trunk and extremities (similar in
appearance to chicken pox) was first described in New York City in 1946. It has also
recently been detected in the Ukraine, Slovenia, Croatia, Turkey and Korea
(Radulovic et al., 1996; Raoult and Roux, 1997; Ozturk et al., 2003). It is transmitted
32
by Liponyssoides sanguineus (formerly Allodermanyssus sanguineus), a mite that
parasitises the domestic mouse, and high risk groups include intravenous drug users
and people living within densely populated areas (Raoult and Roux, 1997; Parola et
al., 1998; Comer et al., 1999; Comer et al., 2001; Choi et al., 2005; Schoeler et
al.,2005).
• Rickettsia slovaca
Rickettsia slovaca is an example of a SFG rickettsia that does not usually produce a
rash in affected patients. It was first isolated from Dermacentor marginatus ticks in
Slovakia in 1968 however, its pathogenic potential was not confirmed until 1980. A
rickettsiosis caused by R. slovaca was first described in 1997 in a patient who
presented with a single lesion on the scalp and enlarged cervical lymph nodes after
receiving a bite from a Dermacentor spp. tick. These clinical signs led to the infection
being termed “tick-borne lymphadenopathy” (TIBOLA). The clinical syndrome
produced by R. slovaca has also recently been referred to as “Dermacentor-borne
necrosis-erythema-lymphadenopathy” (DEBONEL) in Spain (Oteo et al., 2004;
Parola et al., 2005). Most reported cases have been mild and afebrile however the full
spectrum of disease is still unknown as R. slovaca infection has been suspected in
some patients displaying neurological signs. Rickettsia slovaca is thought to be widely
distributed across Europe and can be differentiated from MSF based on its
geographical distribution, the absence of a rash that is common in cases of R. conorii
infection and differences in seasonal occurrence (Beati et al., 1994; Raoult et al.,
1997a; Sekeyová et al., 1998; Parola and Raoult, 2001a; Raoult et al., 2002a).
33
• Rickettsia helvetica
Rickettsia helvetica was originally designated the ‘Swiss agent’ after being isolated
from Ixodes ricinus ticks in Switzerland in 1979 (Beati et al., 1993). More recently,
this rickettsia has been implicated as the cause of two cases of fatal cases of peri-
myocarditis in young patients in Sweden and an unexplained febrile illness in a
French patient. Serological evidence of R. helvetica infections has been demonstrated
in eight patients from Italy, France and Thailand who presented with fever, headache
and myalgia, but no cutaneous rash (Fournier et al., 1998; Nilsson et al., 1999;
Fournier et al., 2004). Rickettsia helvetica has also been reported from Slovenia,
Japan and along the central Thai-Myanmar border. The vector is the tick Ixodes
ricinus (Parola et al., 1998; Nilsson et al., 1999; Fournier et al., 2000; Parola and
Raoult, 2001; Fournier et al., 2002; Satoh et al., 2002; Giammanco et al., 2003;
Ishikura et al., 2003; Parola et al., 2005).
• Japanese spotted fever (JSF), Oriental spotted fever (R. japonica)
The first case of JSF was reported in a patient from Tokushima Prefecture, Japan in
1984 and the causative agent was isolated in 1986 (Takao et al., 2000). Since then it
has been shown to be endemic in areas of southern Japan, where it occurs most
frequently between April and November (Chiya et al., 2000; Takao et al., 2000; Satoh
et al., 2001; Ishikura et al., 2003; Choi et al., 2005). Japanese spotted fever presents
as a typical rickettsiosis with skin rashes that develop initially on the extremities and
then spread to the entire body. Central nervous system involvement and a single
mortality have also been reported (Takao et al., 2000; Araki et al., 2002). Initial
studies identified wild mice as the main mammalian reservoir for R. japonica.
However, recent studies have suggested that dogs and wild deer may also play an
34
important role in the life cycle (Takao et al., 2000; Satoh et al., 2001). The vector
ticks identified are Dermacentor taiwanensis, Haemaphysalis flava and Ixodes spp. in
Japan (Takao et al., 2000; Fournier et al., 2002; Ishikura et al., 2003) and recently,
Haemaphysalis longicornis in Korea (Choi et al., 2005).
• Rickettsia parkeri
Rickettsia parkeri was first detected in Amblyomma maculatum ticks in the southern
United States in 1939. It was thought to be non-pathogenic until a case of human
disease was described in 2004. Rickettsia parkeri produces a mild disease
characterized by multiple eschars and a maculopapular rash. Its true prevalence is
unknown as it is likely that R. parkeri has been mistaken previously for RMSF or
rickettsialpox as it occurs in the same geographical areas (Paddock et al., 2004;
Raoult, 2004). Recently, R. parkeri DNA has also been detected from A. maculatum
ticks in South America (Parola et al., 2005).
• Rickettsia massiliae
Rickettsia massiliae was identified in Rhipicephalus turanicus ticks near Marseilles,
France in 1990. Since then it has also been detected in Rhipicephalus spp. ticks in
other areas of France, Greece, Spain, Portugal and Central Africa (Beati and Raoult,
1993; Parola and Raoult, 2001a). This rickettsia was classified as a “rickettsia of
unknown pathogenicity” until R. massiliae DNA was identified in the blood of an
Italian man who had presented with an eschar and macropapular rash 20 years
previously. A rickettsia was cultured from a blood sample collected at the time of
presentation in 1985 and then stored, making this retroactive study possible (Vitale et
al., 2005).
35
• R. aeschlimannii
Rickettsia aeschlimannii was first detected in Hyalomma marginatum rufipes ticks
collected from Zimbabwe and H. marginatum marginatum ticks collected from
Portugal, however it wasn’t characterized until 1997 following its isolation from H.
marginatum marginatum ticks from Morocco. Rickettsia aeschlimannii has also been
detected in H. marginatum rufipes ticks from Niger and Mali (Pretorius and Birtles,
2002). In 2002, the pathogenicity of R. aeschlimannii was established when an
infection was reported in a patient returning from Morocco to France, and an infection
was subsequently reported in a patient in South Africa (Pretorius and Birtles, 2002).
The rickettsiosis caused by R. aeschlimannii is characterized by an eschar, fever and a
generalized maculopapular skin rash. The widespread nature of R. aeschlimannii has
recently been demonstrated following its isolation in Croatia, Spain and Corsica and
the detection of a rickettsia closely related to R. aeschlimannii from Haemaphysalis
punctata ticks in Kazakhstan and Hyalomma dromedarii and H. truncatum ticks from
the Sudan (Raoult et al., 2002; Fernández-Soto et al., 2003; Punda-Polic et al., 2003;
Matsumoto et al., 2004; Morita et al., 2004; Shpynov et al., 2004).
1.4.2.9 Rickettsiae of unknown pathogenicity
Many rickettsiae whose pathogenicities are still not determined have been identified
worldwide, including R. bellii, R. canadensis, R. montanensis, R. rhipicephali, BJ-90,
R. hulinensis, Rickettsia tamurae sp. nov. and Rickettsia spp. Strain S (Raoult and
Roux, 1997; Zhang et al., 2000; Mediannikov et al., 2004; Fournier et al., 2006).
36
1.4.2.10 Non-pathogenic spotted fever group rickettsiae
Rickettsia peacockii is the only non-pathogenic rickettsia characterized to date. It is
believed to be a tick-symbiotic rickettsia that interferes with the maintenance and
transmission of R. rickettsii in Dermacentor andersoni tick populations. It has been
suggested that the high prevalence of R. peacockii in tick ovaries on the east side of
the Bitterroot Valley in Montana, and in areas of Colorado, interferes with the ability
of R. rickettsii to be transmitted transovarially in these ticks, however it can still be
acquired orally and transmitted transstadially or horizontally. Rickettsia peacockii is
closely related to R. rickettsii however it differs in its limited ability to translate
ompA. Consequently, adhesion to host cells is impaired as is its ability to undergo
actin-based motility, which may explain its restriction to tick vectors and its non-
pathogenic nature (Niebylski et al., 1997; Munderloh and Kurtti, 1995; Azad and
Beard, 1998; Simser et al., 2001; Baldridge et al., 2004).
Non-pathogenic SFG rickettsiae are speculated to have arisen from pathogenic
rickettsiae that over time lost the ability to cause disease in both mammalian and tick
hosts. It is possible that this process could be reversed under certain conditions. Study
of rickettsiae such as R. peacockii may help in defining mechanisms that would allow
non-pathogenic organisms to re-emerge as pathogens and may provide information on
how non-pathogenic endosymbionts could be manipulated for control of the ticks and
the pathogens they harbour (Simser et al., 2001).
1.4.3 Scrub typhus (Orientia tsutsugamushi)
Scrub typhus is an ancient disease. It was described in China in the third century and
it appeared in Western medical literature as early as 1879. Historically, disease had
37
been associated with farmers who entered lowlands to plant crops following spring
floods. Investigators believed that the small red mites that were always plentiful
during disease outbreaks probably played a role in transmission. In the early 1920s,
investigators in Malaysia noticed that there were two distinct forms of typhus fever
occurring. One, probably murine typhus, was seen most often in urban areas, while
the other appeared to be a rural disease and was associated mainly with exposure to
areas of “scrub”, cleared forest lands with secondary vegetation. In 1930 the
rickettsial agent was identified by Nagayo and named Rickettsia orientalis. “Scrub
typhus” was the term used to describe the disease and it is still used commonly around
the world, except in Japan where it is referred to as tsutsugamushi disease (Groves
and Harrington, 1994).
The organism has undergone a number of taxonomic changes and currently belongs to
the genus Orientia. Orientia tsutsugamushi (“tsutsugamushi” means “noxious mite” in
Japanese) is made up of a collection of antigenically and genetically diverse serotypes
(Walker and Fishbein, 1991). The three classic serotypes are: Karp (from Papua New
Guinea), Kato (from Japan) and Gilliam (from Burma) although there are many other
serotypes present in east and south-east Asia and northern Australia (Graves, 1998).
The devastating effect of scrub typhus was particularly noticeable during World War II,
when an estimated 40 000 soldiers were affected by the disease in southern Asia. It was
also thought to be the major cause of “fever of unknown origin” in US troops in
Vietnam (Groves and Harrington, 1994).
38
Scrub typhus has a long history of occurrence in Australia. “Coastal fevers” were first
described in northern Queensland in the agricultural population of farm labourers,
wood and cane cutters in 1877. Scrub typhus was subsequently found to account for a
significant proportion of these cases (Langan and Mathew, 1935) after all attempts to
equate the fevers with known infections such as malaria, typhoid and plague failed
(Derrick, 1957; Graves et al., 1999). Six possible cases of scrub typhus were recorded
in the tropical region of the Northern Territory from 1937 to 1939 (Odorico et al.,
1998). Scrub typhus was again identified as the cause of infections in northern
Queensland during jungle and amphibious warfare training of troops on the Atherton
Tableland during World War II (McCulloch, 1944; Southcott, 1947). In 1941, Gordon
Heaslip demonstrated that the rickettsia was present in rats and bandicoots (Derrick,
1957) and the importance of bandicoots as reservoirs of infection in the scrub typhus
life cycle was emphasised by Campbell and Domrow in 1974.
Since 1990, ten cases (one fatal) of scrub typhus have been reported in Litchfield
Park, Northern Territory and it is suspected that other foci of infection will be
identified in similar rainforest pockets with increased tourism (Currie et al., 1993;
Ralph et al., 2004). The causative agent of this disease has been identified as a novel
strain and called O. tsutsugamushi “Litchfield” (Odorico et al., 1998; Graves et al.,
1999). In 1996 and 1997 there was another outbreak of scrub typhus in army
personnel in north Queensland and in 2000 and 2001, a cluster of scrub typhus cases
were diagnosed in the Torres Strait islands of northern Australia (McBride et al.,
1999; Faa et al., 2003).
39
In 1999, a survey was performed on 920 non-randomly collected serum samples from
the Kimberley region of Western Australia. Twenty four of the 920 samples tested
positive for scrub typhus antibodies. This result, together with a confirmed case from
the area, is highly suggestive of the presence of infection in the north of Western
Australia (Quinlan et al., 1993; Odorico et al., 1998; Graves et al., 1999).
Larvae of the trombiculid mites of the genus Leptotrombidium are the only known
vectors of O. tsutsugamushi. Mites acquire infection at a low rate by feeding on
subdermal lymph and tissue fluids from an infected vertebrate. Infection is maintained
in the mite population through extremely efficient transovarial transmission (Groves
and Harrington, 1994). The trombiculid mites are very susceptible to drying so disease
occurs only in areas of high rainfall and within these areas scrub typhus occurs in focal
areas as there are sharply delineated islands of infected mites (Cook, 1944; Derrick,
1957; 1961; Groves and Harrington, 1994).
Infection of vertebrates occurs after a mite bite. Small rodents of the genus Rattus are
the natural hosts, although over 55 species of mammal have been shown to be naturally
infected with O. tsutsugamushi (Groves and Harrington, 1994). Scrub typhus is one of
the more serious rickettsioses, with mortality prior to the discovery of effective
antibiotic treatment sometimes reaching 60% (Devine, 2003).
1.4.4 Bartonella spp.
Members of the genus Bartonella are fastidious, intracellular, Gram-negative bacilli
that are capable of causing vector-transmitted zoonotic diseases. In the original
40
organisation of bacterial taxonomy, Bartonella was placed in the order Rickettsiales.
However, subsequent revision removed the genus Bartonella (which does not contain
any obligate intracellular pathogens) from the order. The genus Bartonella has since
been combined with the genus Rochalimaea and the new genus Bartonella has been
placed into the α-2 subgroup of Proteobacteria based on 16S rRNA sequence analysis
(La Scola and Raoult, 1997).
The pathogenesis of Bartonella spp. infections differs from that of other rickettsiae in
that they target erythrocytes in the host, however they can also cause proliferation of
vascular endothelial cells and the formation of new blood vessels, a characteristic
unique to the genus (Anderson and Neuman, 1997; Windsor, 2001; La Scola et al.,
2002). Bartonelloses in people can result in a highly variable pattern of disease, with
presentations including haemolytic anaemia, septicaemia, endocarditis, osteolysis,
bacillary angiomatosis, myositis, retinitis, encephalopathy and lymphadenopathy
(Kordick et al., 1999) To date, 10 of the 19 recognised species of Bartonella (B.
bacilliformis, B. quintana, B. henselae, B. elizabethae, B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii, B.
vinsonii subsp. arupensis,. B. koehlerae, B. grahamii, B. washoensis and B.
clarridgeiae) have been implicated in human disease (Zeaiter et al., 2002; Jardine et
al., 2006).
“Carrion’s disease”, which is caused by Bartonella bacilliformis, was perhaps the first
recognised bartonellosis, with descriptions dating back to the 16th century (Ihler,
1996). It is transmitted by sandflies and infection can result in two forms of disease.
The acute form manifests as severe, life threatening anaemia, while the chronic form
results in vascular proliferative lesions of the skin termed “verruga peruana”. It is
41
limited to certain regions of the Andes mountains and although outbreaks still occur
occasionally it is principally viewed as a medical curiosity (Ihler, 1996; Anderson and
Neuman, 1997).
Other Bartonella spp. have had a more devastating impact. “Trench fever”, caused by
Bartonella quintana and transmitted by the human body louse (Pediculus humanus),
was estimated to have affected over 1 million troops during World War I (Anderson
and Neuman, 1997). Cat scratch disease (CSD) which is caused by Bartonella
henselae is also the cause of significant morbidity in many areas of the world. The cat
flea (Ctenocephalides felis) has been shown to be responsible for transmission of B.
henselae between cats, human infection results when the organism is inoculated via
contaminated cat teeth or claws (Windsor, 2001). Cat scratch disease manifests as
lymphoid hyperplasia, granuloma formation, microabscess development, and in some
cases suppuration, and while it is usually a benign and self-limiting disease,
complications and mortalities can occur especially in immuno-compromised
individuals.
Bartonella henselae is the only Bartonella spp. to be extensively recorded in Australia
however there has also been a single case of Bartonella quintana infection reported in
an immuno-compromised patient (Rathbone et al., 1996; Branley, 1997).
42
1.5 OBJECTIVES The overall objective of this study was to address the shortfall of in-depth knowledge
on Western Australian rickettsiae, paying particular attention to the role of native and
feral animals and their ectoparasites as vertebrate hosts and vectors. More specifically,
the aims of this study were:
1. To gain a better understanding of whether species of Rickettsia are present in
WA, with the main emphasis on the tick-borne spotted fever group.
Our understanding of the occurrence of SFG rickettsiae in particular in the State is
lacking. We have serological data and unpublished case information indicating the
presence of members of the biogroup, but so far none have been isolated or
characterized. The first aim of this study therefore is to screen ectoparasite samples
(concentrating on ticks) for rickettsial infection, to confirm their presence and to
identify them either as a previously characterized or a novel species of rickettsia.
2. To identify geographical areas, vectors and vertebrate hosts of interest in local
rickettsial life cycles, in particular, the role of native and feral animals in
rickettsial ecology.
Samples will be opportunistically collected from different geographical locations and
screened to determine whether there is any difference in infection prevalence across
the areas sampled. The potential role of different vertebrate host species will also
investigated, with particular emphasis on the role of WA’s unique native fauna as
reservoir hosts.
43
3. To perform a preliminary investigation into the pathogenic potential of any
novel species identified during this study.
It is important to investigate the zoonotic potential of any novel isolate recovered as
this will largely dictate the course of any future studies on the organism and will
determine whether the investment of resources into control and prevention strategies
is warranted. As yet there is no laboratory-based method for distinguishing pathogenic
from non-pathogenic Rickettsia species and a species can only be established as
pathogenic after it has been isolated from a person demonstrating symptoms of a
rickettsiosis. A questionnaire will be issued and a serosurvey performed on a
population at risk to investigate whether infection is occurring and whether this
infection is associated with symptoms.
4. To contribute to the body of knowledge on rickettsial ecology worldwide in
order to aid in developing a better understanding of the genus Rickettsia.
Due to their obligate intracellular nature, small amount of genetic information and
slow rate of mutation it is very difficult to develop tools for genetic manipulation to
gain a better understanding of rickettsial gene function. Rickettsiologists therefore
have relied almost entirely on the comparison of sequences and phenotypes from
different Rickettsia species to gain an understanding of gene function, rickettsial
ecology, evolution and dissemination. In order to gain the maximum amount of
benefit from this comparison it is imperative therefore to have as much sequence
information as possible from around the world. At the moment, rickettsial research is
very active in Europe and the USA however shortfalls in rickettsial research in other
parts of the world mean that there are still pieces of the rickettsial puzzle missing.
Sequence information from WA Rickettsia species will aid in filling this deficit.
44
Identifying and understanding methods of rickettsial dissemination using molecular
epidemiological techniques is also critical for the development of effective control
strategies.
5. To contribute, through opportunistic sampling, to the current knowledge of tick
presence in Western Australia, including the species of tick present, their
distribution and vertebrate host preference.
Knowledge of the tick species present in an area can aid in predicting which
vector-borne diseases are endemic and will also aid in prompt recognition of
exotic vectors, before they become established in an area.
45
CHAPTER 2
COLLECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF
ECTOPARASITES
2.1 INTRODUCTION
In 1970, F. H. S. Roberts published a comprehensive survey of Australian ticks
performed over a period of approximately 30 years. Since then there has been little
published on the subject (Halliday, 2001). The aim of the initial stage of this project
was to opportunistically collect ticks from different locations throughout the state, in
particular from native animals, and to use the information on vector distribution, in
addition to that published by Roberts, to determine the likelihood of tick-borne
diseases being present in a particular geographical or ecological area of the state.
2.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.2.1 Sample collection
Ectoparasites (ticks primarily, although some fleas were also collected) were
opportunistically collected from wildlife trapped by researchers from the Departments
of Biological Sciences and Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University;
the Department of Animal Science, University of Western Australia and the
Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). These ectoparasites
were collected using guidelines developed by the author (Appendix 2). Additionally,
ectoparasites were collected from animals at a wildlife rehabilitation centre in the
outer suburbs of the Perth metropolitan area. Ticks were also collected from
individuals whose work (researchers trapping animals, workers on Barrow Island) or
46
recreational activities (rogainers, bush walkers) necessitated spending time in heavily
vegetated areas which exposed them to ticks. Maps showing the locations of trap sites
and other collection sites are shown in Figures 2.3 and 2.4. All ticks collected were
placed in Eppendorf vials containing 70% ethanol and catalogued prior to
identification and analysis for the presence of rickettsiae. A list of all ticks collected
and their hosts is shown in Table 2.1.
Trapping of animals on Barrow Island (BWI) was performed in established grids as
part of an annual wildlife census with CALM and strategically around burrowing
bettong warrens (which are also utilised by common brushtail possums and golden
bandicoots) as part of a concurrent PhD project on bettong populations (figure 2.1).
Trapping of yellow-footed antechinuses in Dwellingup was performed in established
grids, again as part of a concurrent PhD project. Trapping by CALM staff used
methods established by the agency over many years.
Briefly, animals were trapped in cage or small Elliot traps placed strategically in study
areas and baited with a mixture of peanut butter, rolled oats and sardines. The traps
were opened in the evening and checked for animals in the early morning. Animals
were handled in bags made from soft material. All trapped animals were examined for
ectoparasites, with particular attention being paid to areas around the animals’ face,
ears, elbows and scrotum or pouch (figure 2.2) (Roberts, 1970). This work was
approved by Murdoch University’s animal ethics committee.
47
Figure 2.1 Native animal trapping on Barrow Island
Figure 2.2 Tick on the ear of a burrowing bettong
48
Figure 2.3. Map of Western Australia showing sample collection sites.
49
Figure 2.4. Map of the southwest of Western Australia showing sample collection sites.
2.2.2 Tick identification
Ticks were identified based on their morphology by light microscopy, using a
dissecting microscope and the taxonomic key outlined in Roberts, 1970. Where
possible, the species was identified. However, in some cases, mouthparts or other
areas of the body used for differentiation were damaged during removal from the host
50
and it was only possible to identify them to the genus level. Fleas were also identified
using light microscopy and a standard key (Dunnet and Mardon, 1974).
2.3 RESULTS
The following is a description and discussion of the results from the tick collection.
Results pertaining to the fleas will be discussed in chapter 5. Table 2.1 shows the
collection site, tick species, the tick’s vertebrate hosts and the number of animals
infected. The scientific names for the animals are listed in Appendix 3.
Tick samples belonging to three different genera (Ixodes, Amblyomma and
Haemaphysalis) were collected in 208 instances from animals, humans or the
environment. Three species of Ixodes were identified, namely I. australiensis, I.
antechini and I. myremecobii. Three different species of Amblyomma were also
collected (A. triguttatum, A. albolimbatum and A. limbatum). One species of
Haemaphysalis, H. ratti was identified. The tick species most commonly collected are
pictured in figures 2.5 – 2.8.
Many of the vertebrate hosts were only infected with one species of tick. For
example, Ixodes antechini was the only tick species collected from yellow-footed
antechinuses, and bobtail lizards were exclusively infected with Amblyomma
albolimbatum, even though the reptiles sampled were from widely separated locations
(Perth and Lake Magenta). Two different species of tick were collected from humans:
Ixodes myremecobii from Lake Magenta and the Fitzgerald River National Park, the
most south-eastern sites from which samples were collected, and Amblyomma
triguttatum from the south-west and from Barrow Island. Of the samples collected
51
from the mainland, Amblyomma triguttatum was the only tick species collected from
more than one vertebrate host species (kangaroos and people).
Table 2.1. Hosts from which tick species were collected in Western Australia, the collection sites and the numbers of animals on which ticks were found.
Host species Collection site (fig.s 2.1 and 2.2)
Ectoparasite species No. of animals or humans with ticks or number of ticks collected from the environment
Bobtail lizard Perth Amblyomma albolimbatum 17
Bobtail lizard Lake Magenta Amblyomma albolimbatum 1
Olive python Kimberleys Amblyomma spp. 1 Yellow-footed Antechinus
Dwellingup Ixodes antechini (fig.2.8) 15
Southern brown Bandicoot
Dwellingup Ixodes australiensis 1
Golden bandicoot Barrow Island Haemaphysalis ratti (fig.2.6) 34
Golden bandicoot Barrow Island Amblyomma limbatum 1
Bandicoot Kimberleys Haemaphysalis spp. 6 Common brushtail Possum
Barrow Island Amblyomma limbatum 15
Common brushtail Possum
Barrow Island Haemaphysalis ratti 4
Burrowing bettong Barrow Island Haemaphysalis ratti 18
Burrowing bettong Barrow Island Amblyomma limbatum 24
Western brush wallaby
Fitzgerald River National Park
Ixodes sp. 1
Western grey kangaroo
Perth Amblyomma triguttatum (fig.2.5)
4
Kimberley rock rat Kimberley Haemaphysalis sp. 1 Rat Kimberley Haemaphysalis sp. 1 Feral pig Serpentine Ixodes sp. 1 Feral pig Nannup Ixodes sp. 1 Humans Fitzgerald River
National Park Ixodes myremecobii 1
Humans Waychinicup National Park
Ixodes myremecobii 1
Humans Lake Magenta Ixodes myremecobii 1 Humans Perth Amblyomma triguttatum 1 Humans Williams Amblyomma triguttatum 14 Humans Barrow Island Amblyomma triguttatum 32
Environment Boddington Amblyomma triguttatum 12
52
Two species of ticks (Haemaphysalis ratti and Amblyomma limbatum) were found on
all three marsupial species trapped on Barrow Island. Golden bandicoots were
predominantly infected with Haemaphysalis ratti ticks (34/35 animals) however a
small number of Amblyomma limbatum ticks (1/35 animals) were also collected from
trapped animals. Conversely, common brushtail possums were predominantly
parasitised by Amblyomma limbatum, however one animal had a Haemaphysalis ratti
tick. Burrowing bettongs had similar numbers of each species of tick collected from
them: Amblyomma limbatum on 24/39 animals, Haemaphysalis ratti on 18/39
animals). Three bettongs were co-infected with both species of ticks at the time of
capture.
Figure 2.5. Dorsal view of Amblyomma triguttatum collected from a person on
Barrow Island.
53
Figure 2.6. Ventral view of Haemaphysalis ratti collected from a golden bandicoot on
Barrow Island.
Figure 2.7. Dorsal view of Amblyomma limbatum collected from a common brushtail
possum on Barrow Island.
54
Figure 2.8. Dorsal view of Ixodes antechini collected from a yellow-footed antechinus
in Dwellingup.
2.4 DISCUSSION
Most of the results obtained in this chapter concur with those reported by Roberts in
his survey (table 2.2 and figure 2.9), the novel findings of this study are discussed
below.
The occurrence of Ixodes antechini in Western Australia has not been previously
reported. Records of this tick species in Australia have been from Antechinus species
(Antechinus flavipes, A. minimus minimus, A. swainsonii swainsonii, A. s. mimetes, A.
m. maritimus, A. stuartii), eastern quolls (Dasyurus viverrinus) and dunnarts
(Smithopsis spp.) in New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia
(Roberts, 1970). A single I. antechini has also been recorded from a bird, the fairy
prion (Pachyptila turtur) in Tasmania (Roberts, 1970). Based on its population
density at the time of trapping, I. antechini seems well established on yellow-footed
antechinuses in the Dwellingup area. It is likely therefore that it has always been
present but was not detected in the survey performed by Roberts. It is not surprising to
55
find that Roberts’ data is incomplete as his survey was a very ambitious undertaking
and could not have hoped to be exhaustive.
Table 2.2 Tick species reported in Western Australia (Roberts, 1970; Stenos et al.,
2003). *: indicates species collected in this study.
Genus Ixodes eudyptidis
tasmani hydromyidis australiensis* fecialis vestitus myremecobii* Genus Haemaphysalis humerosa ratti* lagostrophi Genus Boophilus microplus Genus Rhipicephalus sanguineus Genus Amblyomma calabyi postoculatum limbatum* australiense triguttatum* Genus Aponomma fimbriatum Genus Bothriocroton hydrosauri (formerly Aponomma hydrosauri) Genus Ornithodoros gurneyi
56
Figure 2.9 A map of Western Australia demonstrating previously recorded
distribution of ticks collected in this study (Roberts, 1970; Pearce and Grove, 1987;
M. Harvey, pers. comm., 2003).
IA – Ixodes australiensis; IM- Ixodes myremecobii; AT – Amblyomma triguttatum; HR –
Haemaphysalis ratti; AL – Amblyomma limbatum.
57
If I. antechini is a recent introduction to the state however, it is possible that
movement of the fat-tailed dunnart (Sminthopsis crassicaudata) or the western quoll
(Dasyurus geoffroyi) within their habitat range was responsible for this introduction.
The fat-tailed dunnart’s range extends from the eastern states across to WA. The
distribution of the western quoll is now confined to the southwest of WA although
previously its distribution extended across to the eastern states. It is less likely that the
migration of other marsupial species could have facilitated the introduction as
although Antechinus flavipes occurs in both WA and the eastern states, these
populations have been shown to be separated by a large geographical barrier
(Menkhorst and Knight, 2001). Migration of fairy prions could have been responsible
for the introduction of this tick species as they have been recorded in Tasmania and
WA. This would be less likely however, as fairy prions are uncommon in WA, they
are also seabirds and Dwellingup is located a considerable distance inland (Roberts,
1970; Simpson and Day, 1986). These observations however are merely speculative
and would need to be proved by comparing populations of ticks across Australia using
genetic methods.
Another interesting finding of this study is the identification of the reptile-associated
tick Amblyomma limbatum (Roberts, 1970) from mammals, namely the common
brushtail possum and the burrowing bettong on Barrow Island. Although, Amblyomma
limbatum ticks are relatively non-specific about their choice of reptile host, finding
such a large number on mammalian hosts is unusual (Belan and Bull, 1995). This
could mean that the range of this tick species is not dependent on the presence of
reptiles.
58
Throughout the world, in tropical, temperate and even tundra regions, ticks are serious
veterinary and medical pests. As vectors, ticks surpass all other arthropods in the
variety of microparasites that they transmit to humans as well as to livestock. These
include fungi, viruses, bacteria, rickettsia and protozoan parasites (Randolph, 2000).
For this reason it is important to determine the range of tick species present in the
State, and their geographical distribution and ecology. This information can then be
used to assess the risk of tick-borne diseases, which are often associated with specific
tick genera or species (eg. the association of Queensland tick typhus with Ixodes spp.
in the eastern states) and to prioritise the areas where control and prevention measures
are implemented. Baseline knowledge of the tick species present in an area will also
aid in the prompt recognition of exotic species which can be introduced by migratory
birds and people travelling into the country. For example, Dermacentor variabilis
ticks, which are vectors of Rocky Mountain spotted fever, have been removed from
travellers returning to the east coast of Australia, and an eco-climatic analysis
indicated that they would be capable of establishing and propagating in the area if left
to do so unchecked (Russell, 2001).
There are no previous reports incriminating Ixodes antechini as a vector for agents of
zoonotic or animal disease. At this stage therefore, the likelihood of tick-borne
diseases being present in WA is not increased by finding this previously unreported
tick species here. Of the ticks collected in this study and already reported in the state,
Amblyomma triguttatum and the Ixodes spp. are of potential zoonotic importance.
Amblyomma triguttatum is a recognised vector of Coxiella burnetii and is likely to be
involved in its life cycle in Western Australia (McDiarmid, et al., 2000) and Ixodes
spp. are known vectors of many zoonotic pathogens including Rickettsia australis, R.
59
helvetica and Borrelia spp. (Estrada-Pen~ and Jongejan, 1999), it is possible therefore
that these pathogens are present or could become established in the state if introduced.
Although this study is by no means comprehensive, due to the logistical problems of
sampling across a large State, the findings have contributed to our knowledge of tick
ecology in Australia and have set a firm basis for further studies of sub-populations in
the future.
60
CHAPTER 3
DETECTION OF RICKETTSIAE IN ECTOPARASITES COLLECTED IN WA
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The significance of rickettsioses to human and animal health is becoming increasingly
recognised worldwide (Raoult and Roux, 1997). In contrast to the eastern states, there
is a limited amount of information on the presence of rickettsiae in Western Australia,
a State which is effectively isolated by the Nullarbor Plain in the south and by the
Great Sandy, Gibson and Great Victoria Deserts further north. Murine typhus was
first reported in the state in 1927 and cases have since been described from Albany in
the south to Exmouth in the north (Saint et al., 1954; Forbes et al., 1991; Kelly et al.,
1995; O'Connor et al., 1996; Beaman and Marinovitch, 1999). The presence of scrub
typhus was also confirmed in the north of the state when a case was diagnosed in the
Kimberleys in 1998 (Odorico et al., 1998). In addition, there is strong circumstantial
evidence that spotted fever group rickettsiae are present in WA as a few cases of
spotted fever have been diagnosed clinically and serologically in people who have not
been outside the State in the months preceding their illness, including one case in a
veterinarian associated with Murdoch University (J. Stenos, pers. comm., 2005).
Preliminary epidemiological studies have detected spotted fever antibodies in human
sera from the north and southwest of the state and scrub typhus antibodies in the
north, however no rickettsiae have been isolated thus far (Burnet, 1942; Stewart,
1991; Kilminster T. An Investigation of Typhus in Western Australia. Honours
Thesis: Department of Microbiology, University of Western Australia; 1997; Graves
et al., 1999). The aim of the current study was to investigate the presence of
61
rickettsiae in WA and to determine some epidemiological aspects of the infections,
including distribution, vertebrate hosts and tick vectors.
3.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.2.1 Study design
A comprehensive survey of the whole State was not possible therefore the aim of this
study was to use the opportunistically collected ectoparasite samples described in
chapter 2 for analysis. Barrow Island (BWI), which is located about 1300km north of
Perth and approximately 60 km off the coast, was particularly targeted for sampling as
there had been anecdotal evidence for the occurrence of a disease of unknown but
possibly rickettsial origin (J. Drummond, pers. comm., 2003) and workers on the
island suffered a high incidence of tick bites.
Ectoparasite samples were collected for analysis as, in addition to being a relatively
non-invasive, easily collected sample, they are also a vital part of the rickettsial life
cycle, making them a sensitive indicator of the presence of rickettsiae in an area. Once
infected, ectoparasites remain so for life and rickettsial infection is easily detected
using molecular techniques, while in vertebrate hosts molecular-based screening relies
entirely on the detection of the transient rickettsaemic phase (Kelly et al., 1992a;
Raoult and Roux, 1997).
62
3.2.2 Ectoparasite identification
The methods and results for ectoparasite collection and identification are described in
chapter 2.
3.2.3 Detection of rickettsial DNA Using PCR
3.2.3.1 Extraction of DNA
DNA was extracted from the ethanol preserved ticks using Chelex-100 resin (Bio-rad
Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and a protocol based on that previously described
by Guttman et al. (1996). If the tick was large (approximately 4mm or greater in
length) it was bisected longitudinally and the remaining half was stored in 70%
ethanol. If the ticks were smaller, up to four ticks from a single animal were used for
extraction.
Ticks were removed from the 70% ethanol and washed with distilled water.
Dissection was performed using a sterile scalpel blade and a new disposable glass
microscope slide. Each dissected tick was placed into an Eppendorf tube containing
300µL of 10% Chelex and the tube was incubated at 56°C overnight. After vortexing
for 15 s the samples were heated at 95°C for 15 min and then vortexed for a further 15
s. The samples were finally centrifuged at 14 000 rpm for 5 min before the
supernatant containing the DNA was removed for use in the PCR reactions. The DNA
was stored at 4°C between uses (12-48 hours) and at -20°C for longer-term storage.
3.2.3.2 Screening PCR
The preparation of the PCR pre-mix was performed in a “DNA-free” room. DNA
extraction, the loading of DNA into the PCR premix, the running of the PCR assays
63
and the loading of PCR products into gels were also performed in separate areas to
avoid cross-contamination.
DNA from Rickettsia typhi, R. honei and R. australis was used as positive control
material (kindly provided by Dr Stephen Graves from the Australian Rickettsial
Reference Laboratory (ARRL)) and DNA from Coxiella burnetii, Bartonella henselae
and Rickettsia felis was supplied by the World Health Organisation (WHO) Rickettsia
Reference Center, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, U.S.A.
(kindly supplied by Dr. Greg Dasch). Positive and negative controls (distilled water)
were used with every PCR reaction, the reaction was repeated if the expected result
was not obtained for either of the controls. All primers were purchased from
Invitrogen Life Technologies (Mount Waverley, Victoria, Australia).
Primers that amplify a 381 base pair segment of the citrate synthase gene (gltA) of
Rickettsia prowazekii (RpCS.877p GGG GGC CTG CTC ACG GCG G and
Rp.CS.1258n ATT GCA AAA AGT ACA GTG AAC A) were chosen from published
studies for the initial screening of samples (Regnery et al., 1991). These primers
detect DNA from members of the genus Rickettsia, the genus Bartonella and Coxiella
burnetii (Regnery et al., 1991; Birtles and Raoult, 1996). They do not amplify DNA
from Orientia tsutsugamushi.
PCR was performed using a buffer concentration of 1x (Fisher Biotech, West Perth,
Western Australia), dideoxynucleotide triphosphate concentrations of 0.2 mM (dNTP,
Fisher Biotech), primer concentrations of 0.2 µM and 0.5 units of Taq DNA
polymerase (Fisher Biotech) per tube. During validation of the PCR, a MgCl2 (Fisher
64
Biotech) concentration of 2mM was found to be optimal. The PCR premix was made
up to 17µL and 3µL of DNA template was added for each reaction.
PCR cycling conditions described by Regnery et al. (1991) were used with an
increased annealing temperature found to be more optimal for the laboratory’s PCR
thermocyclers. A hot start of 95°C for 5 minutes was followed by 35 cycles of
denaturation (20s at 95°C), annealing (30s at 53°C) and extension (2min at 60°C). A
final extension (7 min at 72°C) was then performed and reactions were held at 14°C.
Amplification was carried out using a Perkin Elmer 2400 thermocycler machine
(Perkin Elmer, Wellesley, MA, USA).
3.2.3.3 PCR product detection methods
PCR products were visualised using ultraviolet light following electrophoresis on 1%
agarose gels. One gram of agarose (Bio-rad Laboratories) was added to 100 ml of
tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer (40 mM Tris-HCL; 20 mM acetate; 2 mM EDTA;
pH 7.9) and dissolved in the microwave. After the agarose had cooled slightly, 1µL of
ethidium bromide was added. The agarose solution was then poured into a gel tray
with a 20 well comb that had been taped with autoclave tape. Once the gel had set,
4µL of loading buffer (Sigma, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA) was added to 20µL of
PCR product and the mixture was loaded into the wells. The DNA was
electrophoresed on horizontal gels in electrophoretic cells (Bio-rad Laboratories) at 80
volts for approximately 40 minutes and visualised under ultraviolet light. The image
was then saved digitally for analysis with the Molecular Analyst program (Bio-rad
Laboratories).
65
3.2.4 Sequencing
3.2.4.1 Sequencing of the gltA and ompA genes
At least one PCR positive sample from each location (and within these locations from
each vector and vertebrate host), was sequenced using the gltA gene primers
previously described. Eighty microlitres of PCR product were electrophoresed on a
1% agarose gel (4 x 20µL of PCR product were run in adjacent wells), visualized
using ultraviolet light and cut out of the gel using a sterile scalpel blade. The PCR
product was purified from unincorporated primers and nucleotides using the
QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the protocol described
by the manufacturer, with the exception that the final DNA was stored in 30 µL of
elution buffer.
Sequencing was performed using 5µL of DNA template, 4µL of Big Dye version 3.1
terminator mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and 3.2pM of primer.
The reaction mix was made up to 10µL using PCR grade water. The sequencing PCR
amplification conditions were as follows: an initial step of 95°C for 2 min followed by
25 cycles of denaturing (96°C for 10s), annealing (50°C for 5s) and extension (60°C
for 4 min) before being held at 14°C indefinitely.
The dye terminators were removed using Centrisep columns (Princeton Separations,
Inc., Adelphia, NJ, USA) and the protocol described by the manufacturer. The
purified PCR product was sequenced using an Applied Biosystems 377 XL automatic
sequencer and sequences were analysed using the Chromas version 1.45 program
(Technelysium Pty. Ltd., Tewantin, QLD, Australia). Each gene fragment was
sequenced in the forward and reverse directions.
66
The initial gltA sequences of several of the PCR-positive samples were compared to
previously characterized rickettsiae using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
(BLAST, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) program. As some of these isolates
were identified as members of the SFG it was thought to be prudent to do further
sequencing of these samples using primers for the SFG-specific ompA gene. The
ompA gene mutates more rapidly than the gltA gene and therefore is a more sensitive
indicator of any divergence between the closely related SFG rickettsial species
(Regnery et al., 1991). The primers used were Rp.190.70 (ATG GCG AAT ATT TCT
CCA AAA) and Rp.190.701 (GTT CCG TTA ATG GCA GCA TCT) (Fournier et al.,
1998). These primers amplify an approximately 630 base pair region of the ompA
gene.
PCR was performed using a buffer concentration of 1x, dNTP concentrations of 0.2
mM, primer concentrations of 0.1 µM and 1.25 units of Taq DNA polymerase per
tube. During validation of the PCR, a MgCl2 concentration of 2mM was found to be
optimal. The PCR premix was made up to 49µL and 1µL of DNA template was added
for each reaction.
PCR cycling conditions involved a “hot start” of 95°C for 3 minutes followed by 35
cycles of denaturation (20s at 95°C), annealing (30s at 46°C) and extension (1min at
65°C). A final extension (7 min at 72°C) was then performed before holding at 14°C
(Fournier et al., 1998).
67
3.2.4.2 Sequence analysis
After an initial alignment the sequences were cut so that they were all the same
length. In order to determine how many species of rickettsia had been detected in this
study, fragments of the gltA and ompA genes from a selection of samples from
different geographical areas, vectors and vertebrate hosts were sequenced, aligned and
compared using the multisequence alignment program CLUSTAL W in the
BISANCE software package. The novel strains were then compared to Rickettsia
species with validly published names (Genbank accession numbers are listed in
appendix 4). Sequence similarities were calculated using the INFOALIGN program in
the EMBOSS software package (Williams, 2001).
3.3 RESULTS
3.3.1 Screening of ectoparasites
The ectoparasite samples collected and the results of their PCR screening are
displayed in table 3.1.
68
Table 3.1. Tick samples collected from different hosts and locations in Western
Australia and their screening PCR status
Host species Collection site
Tick species GltA screening (+ve/no. screened)
Bobtail lizard Perth Amblyomma
albolimbatum
2/17
Bobtail lizard Lake Magenta Amblyomma
albolimbatum
0/1
Olive python Kimberley Amblyomma spp. 0/1 Yellow-footed Antechinus
Dwellingup Ixodes antechini 8/15
Southern brown Bandicoot
Dwellingup Ixodes australiensis 0/1
Golden bandicoot Barrow Island Haemaphysalis ratti 2/34
Golden bandicoot Barrow Island Amblyomma limbatum 0/1
Bandicoot Kimberleys Haemaphysalis spp. 2/6 Common brushtail Possum
Barrow Island Amblyomma limbatum 7/15
Common brushtail Possum
Barrow Island Haemaphysalis ratti 0/4
Burrowing bettong Barrow Island Haemaphysalis ratti 3/14
Burrowing bettong Barrow Island Amblyomma limbatum 4/4
Western brush wallaby Fitzgerald River National Park
Ixodes spp. 0/1
Western Grey Kangaroo
Perth Amblyomma triguttatum 4/4
Kimberley Rock Rat Kimberley Haemaphysalis spp. 0/1 Rat Kimberley Haemaphysalis spp. 0/1 Feral pig Serpentine Ixodes spp. 1/1 Feral pig Nannup Ixodes spp. 0/1 Humans Fitzgerald River
National Park Ixodes myremecobii 0/1
Humans Waychinicup National Park
Ixodes myremecobii 0/1
Humans Lake Magenta Ixodes myremecobii 0/1 Humans Perth Amblyomma triguttatum 1/1 Humans Williams Amblyomma triguttatum 4/14 Humans BWI Amblyomma triguttatum 15/32
Humans/environment Boddington Amblyomma triguttatum 0/12
69
3.3.2 Prevalence
Of the ticks collected on the mainland 8/15 (54%) Ixodes antechini ticks collected
from yellow-footed antechinuses were PCR positive for infection using gltA gene
primers. Four out of fourteen (29%) of the Amblyomma triguttatum ticks from
Williams were also positive as were 2/17 (12%) of the Amblyomma albolimbatum
ticks collected from bobtail lizards from Perth.
Of the ticks collected from Barrow Island 15/32 (47%) Amblyomma triguttatum ticks
collected from people, 2/34 (6%) Haemaphysalis ratti ticks collected from bandicoots
and 7/15 (47%) Amblyomma limbatum ticks collected from possums were PCR
positive. Although other ticks were positive for rickettsiae, the sample sizes from the
other sites and hosts were too small to use for any meaningful indications of
prevalence.
3.3.3 Sequence Similarities
The percentage nucleotide similarity comparing 328 bp of the gltA gene and 542 bp of
the ompA gene from the two strains identified in this study and previously
characterized Rickettsia species are displayed in tables 3.2 and 3.3.
70
Table 3.2. Percentage gltA sequence similarity between the two strains identified in
this study and those of previously characterised Rickettsia spp.
Name % Similarity to Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1
% Similarity to Rickettsia sp. strain D-1
Rickettsia sp. strain BWI- 1 100% 98.8%
Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 98.8% 100%
R. prowazekii 93.3% 93.3%
R. typhi 93.0% 93.0%
R. africae 98.2% 98.8%
R. conorii 98.2% 98.8%
R. sibirica 98.5% 99.1%
R. honei 98.5% 99.1%
R. slovaca 98.2% 98.8%
R. parkeri 98.5% 98.8%
R. rickettsii 97.5% 98.2%
R. massiliae 97.9% 98.5%
R. rhipicephali 98.2% 98.8%
R. aeschlimannii 98.8% 99.4%
R. montanensis 98.5% 99.1%
R. japonica 98.5% 99.1%
R. heilongjiangii 98.8% 99.4%
R. Helvetica 94.8% 94.8%
R. felis 95.1% 95.7%
R. akari 94.8% 95.4%
R. australis 95.7% 96.3%
R. bellii 86.0% 86.3%
71
Table 3.3. Percentage ompA sequence similarity between the two strains identified in
this study and those of previously characterised Rickettsia spp.
Name % Similarity to
Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1
% Similarity to
Rickettsia sp. strain D-1
Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 100% 96.7%
Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 96.7% 100%
R. africae 93.5% 94.6%
R. conorii 92.3% 93.2%
R. sibirica 93.2% 94.6%
R. honei 93.0% 94.3%
R. slovaca 93.7% 95.0%
R. parkeri 93.0% 93.7%
R. rickettsii 92.6% 93.2%
R. massiliae 95.4% 94.8%
R. rhipicephali 95.4% 94.8%
R. aeschlimannii 94.8% 94.1%
R. montanensis 94.4% 93.7%
R. japonica 93.2% 93.7%
R. heilongjiangii 94.1% 94.6%
R. felis 53.1% 53.9%
R. australis 85.9% 85.5%
Based on the alignment of the gltA gene segment the rickettsial strain present in the
samples from the feral pig from Serpentine, the people from Williams, the bobtail
lizards, kangaroos and people from Perth and the people, bandicoots, burrowing
bettongs and possums from BWI are identical. This was designated Rickettsia spp.
strain BWI-1. The other rickettsial strain was only present in the ticks collected from
72
the yellow-footed antechinuses, this strain was present in all the PCR positive
amplicons sequenced from these ticks. It is 98.8% similar to Rickettsia sp. strain
BWI-1 and was named Rickettsia spp. strain D-1. The ompA gene sequences
confirmed the gltA gene sequence results. Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 is 96.7% similar
to Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 based on the ompA gene sequences.
Sequencing of amplicons from the PCR-positive tick samples showed the possible
presence of two novel rickettsia strains. The gltA gene segment Rickettsia sp. strain
BWI-1 is most similar to R. heilongjiangii, R. aeschlimannii and Rickettsia sp. strain
D-1 at 98.8% sequence similarity. The ompA gene segment of Rickettsia sp. strain
BWI-1 is 95.6% similar to R. massiliae and R. rhipicephali, these are its closest
relative from the previously characterized rickettsial species however it shows a
higher degree of sequence similarity to Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 at 96.7%. Based on
the segment of the gltA gene sequenced, Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 shares 99.4%
nucleotide similarity with both R. heilongjiangii and R. aeschlimannii. The sequenced
ompA segment of Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 demonstrates 95.0% similarity with R.
slovaca.
3.4 DISCUSSION
3.4.1 Aetiology
In order to be classified as a novel species Fournier et al., 2003 recommend that an
isolate should be less than 99.9% similar with the most related species of previously
characterized rickettsia based on its gltA gene and less than 98.8% based on its ompA
gene. Based on these criteria, the percentage similarity shown by the two strains to
previously characterized rickettsiae and to each other provides strong evidence that
73
both Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 and Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 are novel and distinct
species.
3.4.2 Prevalence
Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 showed a wide range of prevalences in different tick
species, spanning from 6 to 47%. It is likely however that there were PCR inhibitors
present in the ticks that may not have been completely removed in the DNA
extraction process (Schwartz et al., 1997). These and other factors would have
contributed to the sensitivity of the PCR assay being less than 100%, so true
prevalence is probably higher than these figures suggest.
An infection rate of 47% is relatively high, as although tick surveys performed in
Africa have demonstrated a high prevalence of infection (up to 72%), studies
conducted in other parts of the world generally report lower rates of infection (Dupont
et al, 1994; Beati et al, 1995).
The range in prevalences may be due to different tick species being exposed to
rickettsiae at different rates or inherent differences in the vector capabilities of
different tick species, or it could be due to differences between the island and
mainland ecosystems where Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 occurs. It is also possible that
the vertebrate hosts identified in this study have varying levels of host competency for
an infecting rickettsia (i.e. susceptibility to infection, ability to support effective
proliferation of the rickettsiae and duration of rickettsaemia). Tick species that favour
a host with a relatively poor host competency are less likely to be exposed to the
rickettsia and therefore can be expected to have a lower prevalence of infection.
74
Conversely, if a tick species favours an efficient host, they are likely to have a higher
prevalence of infection.
It has previously been demonstrated that tick species can transmit rickettsial species
transovarially with different levels of efficiency. Dermacentor variabilis ticks, for
example, can become infected with either Rickettsia montanensis or R. rhipicephali.
A study found that while these ticks still had high levels of R. montanensis infection
after two generations they were unable to sustain infection with R. rhipicephali for
more than one generation. It is possible therefore, that even though infected ticks are
found in nature, Dermacentor ticks are not optimal hosts for R. rhipicephali, a species
originally isolated from the brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Macaluso et
al., 2002). Extrapolating this to the present study, it is possible that Haemaphysalis
ratti ticks are not as efficient vectors of Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 as Amblyomma
triguttatum.
Differences in prevalence rates could also be due to the ecosystems. As Barrow Island
is a closed ecosystem, a rickettsia that is transovarially transmitted efficiently and that
infects ticks permanently could reach a very high prevalence within a few generations.
In contrast, a mainland ecosystem would theoretically, have new, uninfected ticks
constantly moving in from surrounding areas which would mean that a lower
prevalence of infection could be expected.
The differences in prevalence of infection between the tick species could also be, in
part due to laboratory and statistical artifact. The unengorged Haemaphysalis ratti are
significantly smaller than the other species of ticks and it is possible that methods
75
used, particularly the extraction techniques may not detect infection as well in this
species. In addition, the number of these ticks screened in this study was relatively
small and may not have given a true indication of the prevalence of infection.
3.4.3 Life cycle: vectors and reservoir hosts
Rickettsiae often have complex life cycles involving a number of different
ectoparasite vectors, domestic animal and wildlife reservoir hosts. This ability to
utilise a range of vectors and hosts maximises the likelihood that the rickettsial
infection will be maintained and propagated. Sylvatic life cycles are particularly
advantageous being, in many cases, a reservoir of infection that is not reliant on or
contained by human activity. Ectoparasites and vertebrates can interact to maintain
infection in these sylvatic life cycles and consequently infection can be readily
transmitted from sylvatic to domestic life cycles where they can infect people.
The importance of sylvatic life cycles in the epidemiology of rickettsioses has been
widely demonstrated. For example, Ctenocephalides felis on opossums have been
shown to transmit R. felis and R. typhi infections to the domestic cat-flea cycle when
the opossums begin to scavenge around suburban houses (Sorvillo et al., 1993;
Boostrom et al., 2002). In Australia, R. australis utilizes the tick vectors Ixodes
tasmani, I. holocyclus and I. cornuatus in its life cycle. All these tick species can
infect both native and domestic animals and could therefore link the sylvatic and
domestic life cycles (Roberts, 1970; Pinn and Sowden, 1998).
The life cycle of Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 appears to involve several different tick
species and potentially a wide range of vertebrate hosts, including feral pigs, golden
76
bandicoots, kangaroos, burrowing bettongs, common brushtail possums and bobtail
lizards. It has not yet been established whether these vertebrates become infected and
therefore act as reservoirs of disease. This is especially true of the lizards, as despite
R. honei being found in a reptile-associated tick, the ability of reptiles to harbour
rickettsial infection is unknown (Stenos et al., 2003).
It is certainly possible that other species of vertebrate parasitised by these vectors
could also be involved in the ecology of the novel rickettsiae. It was not possible to
determine the species of the Ixodes tick on the pig however there are several species
of Ixodes known to occur in the southwest of the state that are non-specific in their
choice of vertebrate host. Ixodes australiensis were the only Ixodes spp. ticks
collected in a recent study on the tick species parasitizing feral pigs in the southwest
of WA, therefore it is highly likely that these ticks were also I. australiensis (Lee,
pers. comm., 2006). Haemaphysalis ratti has been shown by other researchers to
parasitise western-barred bandicoots (Perameles bougainville) on Dorre Island, off
the mid-west coast of WA. Amblyomma albolimbatum is known to infest a wide
variety of reptiles as is Amblyomma limbatum, which prior to this study has
predominantly been recorded from reptiles (Roberts, 1970). In this study it was found
on common brushtail possums, burrowing bettongs and golden bandicoots. If
Amblyomma limbatum is indeed prevalent on mammals it is possible that it could
transmit Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 to a wide range of hosts. Amblyomma
triguttatum ticks were only collected from people on Barrow Island; however, of the
animal species present on the island, the black-footed rock wallaby (Petrogale
lateralis), spectacled hare wallaby (Lagorchestes conspicillatus) and the euro
(Macropus robustus) are potential vertebrate hosts (Roberts, 1970; Menkhorst and
77
Knight, 2001). The western grey kangaroo (Macropus fuliginosus), a common host
for Amblyomma triguttatum ticks, is widespread throughout the state, although it is
not found on Barrow Island.
Another interesting finding is that, of the three marsupial species trapped on BWI,
golden bandicoots were predominantly infected with Haemaphysalis ratti, however,
one animal was also infected with an Amblyomma limbatum tick. In contrast, common
brushtail possums were most frequently infected with Amblyomma limbatum ticks but
a small number of Haemaphysalis ratti were also collected from them. Burrowing
bettongs were infested with relatively even numbers of each species of tick. It is
noteworthy that some bettongs and one possum were co-infected with both tick
species at the time of capture. This may explain the presence of Rickettsia sp. strain
BWI-1 in more than one species of tick as a rickettsaemic animal infected with both
Haemaphysalis ratti and Amblyomma limbatum ticks may be able to transmit the
same species of rickettsia to both tick types. There is a slight possibility however, that
two species of tick feeding in close proximity could transmit rickettsiae horizontally
without the host animal becoming infected (Raoult and Roux, 1997). If this is in fact
the case, it would alter how we must view the epidemiology of the novel strain, as a
reservoir host might not be necessary for the maintenance of the rickettsia (Richter et
al., 2002). Based on these results, it appears that Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 has a
complex life cycle that would make implementing effective control and prevention
measures difficult.
In contrast to Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1, Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 has only been
identified in one tick species to date, Ixodes antechini, and on one vertebrate host, the
78
yellow-footed antechinus. Ixodes antechini, the tick vector of Rickettsia sp. strain D-1
has not been previously recorded in WA. In the eastern states it has been known to
parasitise Antechinus species (Antechinus flavipes, A. minimus minimus, A. swainsonii
swainsonii, A. s. mimetes, A. m. maritimus, A. stuartii), eastern quolls (Dasyurus
viverrinus), dunnarts (Smithopsis spp.) and fairy prions (Pachyptila turtur). It would
be prudent to collect and analyse other tick species in the area to try and establish
whether this is a rickettsia that utilises a simple and specific life cycle or whether
these tick and vertebrate species are part of a more complex life cycle. If the life cycle
is in fact simple and specific then there is a decreased likelihood that people will
become infected and it is unlikely to be of great zoonotic significance.
3.4.4 Geographical distribution
Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 appears to be widely distributed across the sites sampled
in the southwest of the mainland and also on BWI. Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 has thus
far only been identified in one location. The locations where the strains were
identified are depicted in Figure 3.1.
79
Figure 3.1 Distribution of the rickettsial strains across WA. * - Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1;
^ - Rickettsia sp. strain D-1.
As rickettsiae can only be maintained in areas that are conducive to the survival of
their ectoparasite vectors an idea of their potential geographical distribution can be
obtained by examining the distribution of these vectors.
Most of the tick species utilised by Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 have a relatively
limited geographical distribution. Amblyomma triguttatum ticks occur in the
southwest of the state and on BWI. Ixodes spp. only occur in the state’s southwest
where there is sufficient rainfall for their survival. Haemaphysalis ratti, in addition to
80
occurring on BWI is present on Dorre Island (Roberts, 1970; M. Harvey, pers.comm,
2003). Amblyomma limbatum has only been reported from Abrolhos, Barrow and
Bernier Islands and Mount Wynne (Roberts, 1970). Amblyomma albolimbatum in
contrast, is known to occur extensively throughout the state. Consequently Rickettsia
sp. strain BWI-1 may have a wider geographical distribution than demonstrated by
this study if Amblyomma albolimbatum is a significant vector.
Ixodes antechini has not previously been recorded in Western Australia. Other species
of Australian Ixodes are distributed only where there is sufficient rainfall to provide
the ambient moisture they require, therefore it is unlikely that the range of Ixodes
antechini extends far into the drier areas surrounding the State’s southwest. Therefore,
unless Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 is able to utilise other tick species as vectors, it is
unlikely that it has a geographical range extending beyond the State’s southwest.
It is also possible that an unidentified rickettsia species is present in the Kimberley
region of WA. Spotted fever group and TG antibodies were detected in the region in a
survey conducted on human sera in 1999 (Graves et al., 1999) and the unsequenced
PCR-positive samples obtained from Haemaphysalis spp. collected from bandicoots in
this study provide further evidence for the existence of other species.
3.4.5 Zoonotic Potential
The pathogenic potential of Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 and Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 is
unknown. However, all SFG rickettsiae found in ticks that bite people should be
considered potential pathogens (Raoult, 2004) and in the current study Rickettsia sp.
strain BWI-1 has been found in Amblyomma triguttatum ticks most of which were
81
removed from people. It was not possible to speciate the Ixodes spp. tick infected with
Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 due to damage to the mouthparts, however, of the Ixodes
spp. present in WA, I. tasmani is the only species conclusively known to bite humans
(Roberts, 1970), and it is also a known vector of R. australis (Campbell and Domrow,
1974). The other vectors for Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 (Haemaphysalis ratti,
Amblyomma albolimbatum and Amblyomma limbatum) are not known to bite people.
Ixodes antechini is not known to bite people, however this does not definitely
discount Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 as a human pathogen as other anthropomophilic
vectors may be involved in the life cycle.
Subsequent stages of this project will investigate further the epidemiological and
genotypic characterization of the novel strains and their zoonotic potential.
82
CHAPTER 4
CHARACTERIZATION OF RICKETTSIA sp.
STRAIN BWI-1
4.1 INTRODUCTION
Extensive sequencing of novel rickettsial isolates gives us important insights not only
into the novel isolate itself but also into the Rickettsia genus as a whole, providing
valuable information on rickettsial pathogenicity, obligate intracellular parasitism and
bacterial evolution (Wood and Azad, 2000).
Rickettsial taxonomy is a controversial, continuously evolving field. Rickettsiologists
have demonstrated that the 70% DNA-DNA relatedness used to describe bacterial
species does not adequately differentiate rickettsiae. It has been proposed that
rickettsiae have been subjected to different evolutionary pressures due to their small
genome size and strict intracellular nature (Stenos et al., 1998; Fournier et al., 2003).
In 2003, Fournier et al. described a set of objective guidelines for the classification of
new rickettsial isolates based on sequences from several genes, namely the 16S
rRNA, citrate synthase (gltA), ompA and ompB and sca4 genes. Multiple genes with
different evolutionary pressures provide the maximum amount of information about a
new isolate.
Extensive characterization of the genotypic and phenotypic properties of novel
isolates and their comparison to previously characterized species of rickettsiae also
provides valuable information about the Rickettsia genus. The obligate intracellular
83
nature of rickettsiae causes technical difficulties which have long prohibited detailed
study of their gene function through traditional molecular-based methods. These
difficulties include having to ensure any genetic manipulation will not interfere with
the rickettsia’s ability to infect host cells or else the manipulation will automatically
fail. The successful isolation of the first “knock-out” of R. prowazekii was not
obtained until early 2005 (Renesto et al., 2005). The identification and isolation of
rickettsial transformants has also been difficult due to a lack of selectable markers.
In the absence of easily utilised genetic tools, rickettsiologists have relied on
information gained from comparing rickettsial genome sequences in order to identify
proteins to be targeted in specific diagnostic assays, novel treatments and vaccine
development. The recent inclusion of rickettsiae in the list of potential bio-terrorism
agents has made the development of tools to prevent, diagnose and treat these
infections a new priority (Renesto et al., 2005).
Extensive sequence information can also be utilised for purposes of molecular
epidemiology. For some infectious microbiological agents molecular epidemiology
can provide very specific information on the nature of transmission events, points of
outbreak and origin of an epidemic and whether a disease is caused by an endemic or
an introduced agent. Molecular epidemiology is not as sensitive for the study of
rickettsiae due to their low rate of genetic exchange, however it is still a valuable
technique that can be used to identify possible modes of dissemination and evolution
(Chae et al., 2003; Tarasevich et al., 2003; Renesto et al., 2005).
84
In Chapter 3, a rickettsia of unknown pathogenicity was detected from Barrow Island
and the southwest of Western Australia in Amblyomma triguttatum ticks collected
collected from people and kangaroos, Haemaphysalis ratti ticks collected from golden
bandicoots and burrowing bettongs, Amblyomma limbatum ticks collected from
burrowing bettongs and common brushtail possums, Amblyomma albolimbatum ticks
collected from bobtail lizards and an Ixodes spp. tick collected from a feral pig. In this
chapter, further characterization was performed on Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 in
order to gain a better understanding of the evolutionary mechanisms of Australian
rickettsiae in particular. This genetic information can also be used in conjunction with
any ecological and phenotypic properties of the isolate that may be identified in the
future in order to gain a better understanding of the Rickettsia genus as a whole.
4.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
4.2.1 Sample collection
Amblyomma triguttatum ticks, a vector of Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 identified in
Chapter 3, were collected from people working on BWI. These ticks were kept alive
in sterile, humid containers so that culture of the infecting rickettsiae could be
performed in the laboratory.
4.2.2 Cell culture
Culture of Rickettsia spp. from these ticks was then undertaken at the Australian
Rickettsia Reference Laboratory in Geelong, Victoria. In order to remove as much of
the surface bacteria as possible the live ticks were placed into a petri-dish and
immersed in 95% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 minutes. The ticks were dried,
sprayed with 70% ethanol and then crushed in 1.5 ml of sterile phosphate-buffered
85
saline (PBS) using the end of a disposable bacterial loop. One millilitre of the tick
solution was passed through a filter (0.45uM filter, Millex, Carrigtwohill, Ireland) and
the filtrate was inoculated into a 25cm2 flask (Nunc, Rochester, NY, USA) containing
confluent XTC-2 cells. The XTC-2 cells were incubated at 28°C in flasks containing
Leibovitz L-15 media (Invitrogen) supplemented with 5% heat inactivated foetal
bovine serum, 0.4% tryptose phosphate (Oxoid, Hampshire, England) and 200mM L-
glutamine (Invitrogen). Cultures were maintained and observed for evidence of
cytopathic effect by light microscopy weekly and by immunofluorescence assay (IFA)
monthly by scientists working at the laboratory.
4.2.3 Immunofluorescence assay
For the IFA, cells from the cultures were acetone-fixed to a slide before being
exposed to human serum that contained antibodies to spotted fever group, typhus
group and scrub typhus group rickettsiae (titre ≥ 1024, supplied by the Australian
Rickettsia Reference Laboratory). Slides were then stained with fluorescein
isothiocyanate (FITC) labelled goat anti-human (IgM, IgG and IgA) antibody
(Biomediq, Doncaster, Vic., Australia). Each conjugate was diluted 1:100 in casein
buffer (2% skim milk powder in PBS, heat inactivated at 56°C for 30 min), incubated
at 35°C for 30 minutes and then washed in 1:10 PBS. A continuous rickettsial culture
and an uninfected XTC-2 cell culture were used as positive and negative controls
respectively. DNA was extracted from IFA positive cultures using Gentra DNA
extraction kits (Gentra, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and the protocol described by the
manufacturer, their IFA-positive status was then confirmed by PCR. Cultures that
were IFA and PCR positive were then passaged into newly confluent XTC-2 flasks.
86
4.2.4 Sequencing
Once it had been established that the cell cultures were infected, gltA and ompA gene
segments from the infecting rickettsial isolate were amplified, sequenced and
compared to the sequences obtained from the tick isolate (Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-
1). DNA was extracted from the cultures using Gentra DNA extraction kits and the
protocol described by the manufacturer. The primers used were RpCS877p and
RpCS1258n for the gltA gene and Rr190.70p and Rr190.701 for the ompA gene.
These primers and their PCR cycling conditions were previously described in chapter
3.
Further PCR amplification and sequencing was performed on the isolate in culture
using other sections of the gltA gene along with segments of the ompB, sca4 and 16S
rRNA encoding genes. A 1098 bp gltA gene fragment, a 482 bp ompB encoding gene
fragment, a 763 bp sca4 fragment and a 1335 bp 16S rRNA fragment were all
sequenced using the primers listed in table 4.1, these were optimised with positive
control DNA before they were used on the samples. PCR conditions are listed in
tables 4.2 and 4.3. All primers were sourced from the literature where possible or
designed using the computer program Amplify 1.2 (Engels, 1993). Sequencing has
been previously described in section 3.2.4.
87
Table 4.1. Primers used for PCR and sequencing of DNA from Ricketssia spp. strain
BWI-1.
Gene primer Primer sequence Reference PCR conditions (table
4.2)
GltA RpCS877p 5’ GGGGGCCTGCTCACGGCGG 3’ (Regnery et al., 1991) 1
GltA RpCS1258n 5’ATTGCAAAAAGTACAGTGAACA 3’ (Regnery et al., 1991) 1
OmpA Rr190.70p 5’ATGGCGAATATTTCTCCAAAA 3’ (Regnery et al., 1991) 2
OmpA Rr190.701 5’ GTTCCGTTAATGGCAGCATCT 3’ (Fournier et al., 1998) 2
GltA CS162F 5’GCAAGTATCGGTGAGGATGTAATC
3’
(Stenos et al., 1998) 3
GltA CS398SF 5’ATTATGCTTGCGGCTGTCGG 3’ (Stenos et al., 1998) 3
GltA CS764SF 5’ATTGCCTCACTTTGGGGACC3’ (Stenos et al., 1998) 3
GltA CS731SR 5’AAGCAAAAGGGTTAGCTCC 3’ (Stenos et al., 1998) 3
GltA CS411SR 5’AATGCCGCAAGAGAACCGACAG3’ (Stenos et al., 1998) 3
GltA CS877R 5’CCGCCGTGAGCAGGCCCCC Designed 3
Omp B ompB120M59 5’CCGCAGGGTTGGTAACTGC 3’ (Roux and Raoult, 2000) 4
ompB ompBr 5’GAGGAGCTTTTTGAGTTGTAG 3’ Designed 4
16s
rRNA
rRNA 1 5’GACTCGGTCCTAGTTTGAGA 3’ (Rogall et al., 1990) 5
16S
rRNA
rRNA3 5’TTTGAGTTTCCTTAACTCCC3’ (Rogall et al., 1990) 5
16S
rRNA
rRNA2 5’CAGCCGACCTAGTGGAGGAA 3’ (Rogall et al., 1990) 5
16S
rRNA
rRNA 4 5’CATAATGGCGCCGACGAC 3’ (Rogall et al., 1990) 5
Sca4 geneD1f 5’ATGAGTAAAGACGGTAACCT 3’ (Sekeyova et al., 2001) 4
Sca4 Gene D928 5’ AAGCTATTGCGTCATCTCCG (Sekeyova et al., 2001) 4
88
Table 4.2. Conditions and the premix used for the PCR reactions amplifying
Rickettsia spp. BWI-1 DNA - all reactions used a buffer concentration of 1x and a
dNTP concentration of 0.2 mM.
PCR conditions (see table 4.1)
Primer concentration (µµµµM)
MgCl2
Concentration (mM)
Taq (u/tube)
Premix volume (µµµµL)
DNA volume (µµµµL)
1 and 3 0.2 2 0.5 17 3
2 0.1 2 1.25 49 1
4 0.25 2.5 1 45 5
5 1 2 2 21 4
Table 4.3. PCR cycling conditions used in all reactions
PCR conditions (see table 4.1) Number of cycles Denaturation Annealing extension
1 35 20 s at 95°C 30 s at 53°C 2 min at 60°C
2 35 20 s at 95°C 30 s at 46°C 1 min at 65°C
3 35 20 s at 95°C 30 s at 50°C 2 min at 70°C
4 40 20 s at 95°C 30 s at 50°C 1.5 min at 68°C
5 40 30 s at 95°C 30 s at 51°C 1 min at 72°C
4.2.5 Sequence analysis.
The sequences were initially subjected to BLAST analysis. The sequences of the gltA,
ompA, ompB, sca4 and 16S rRNA genes for Rickettsia species with validly published
names were then accessed from GenBank (accession numbers in appendix 4) before
the sequences were aligned using the multi-sequence alignment program CLUSTAL
X in the BISANCE software package. All the rickettsial sequences for a gene were cut
to the length of the shortest sequence.
89
The percentage of similarity between the species was determined using the
INFOALIGN program in the EMBOSS software package (Williams, 2001). Sequence
similarities were calculated based on pairwise transitions and transversions between
sequences. Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses were conducted using
MEGA version 2.1 (Kumar et al., 2001). Evolutionary distance matrices were
determined using Kimura 2-parameter methods (Kimura, 1980) and based on these
matrices dendrograms were inferred using the neighbour-joining (NJ), minimum
evolution (ME) and maximum parsimony (MP) analyses. The stability of the
predicted branches was determined using bootstrap analysis. Bootstrap values were
obtained for a consensus tree based on 1000 randomly generated trees using the same
program.
4.3 RESULTS
4.3.1 Sequence analysis.
The rickettsial isolate from the tick culture was 100% homologous with Rickettsia sp.
strain BWI-1, previously characterized in Chapter 3 based on citrate synthase and
ompA gene segments. It was therefore assumed that Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 had
been isolated successfully. Segments of the 16S rRNA (1293 bp), gltA (1098 bp),
ompA (548 bp), ompB (451 bp) and sca4 (758 bp) genes were then sequenced and
compared to previously characterized rickettsial species. These sequences have been
submitted to GenBank (Appendix 5).
The percentage similarity between Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 and the previously
characterized rickettsial species is displayed in Table 4.5. Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1
consistently shows greatest sequence similarity to the R. massiliae subgroup of the
90
spotted fever group (R. massiliae, R. massiliae strain Bar 29, R. rhipicephali, R.
aeschlimanni and R. montanensis (Roux et al., 1997; Fournier et al., 1998)). Based on
the 16S rRNA gene sequences, Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 is most closely related to
R. massiliae and R. rhipicephali at 99.7% sequence similarity. Based on the gltA gene
sequences it is most closely related to R. aeschlimannii at 98.4% sequence similarity.
OmpA gene sequences place Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 closest to R. massiliae at
95.8% similarity. Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 is 97.4% similar to R. rhipicephali based
on its ompB gene sequence and 96.5% similar to R. aeschlimannii based on its sca4
gene sequence.
For most of the genes, the three methods of dendrogram inference (NJ, ME and MP)
produced trees with similar arrangements (Appendix 6), the main difference being the
level of bootstrap support for the branches. Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 appears most
commonly on a branch of its own lying just outside the main clustering of the R.
massiliae subgroup (Figures 4.1- 4.5).
91
Table 4.5. Percentage similarity between Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 and Rickettsia
species with validly published names.
Name % Similarity 16S rRNA
GltA ompA ompB sca4
R. prowazekii 98.8% 92.4% NS 76.7% 76.5%
R. typhi 98.7% 92.2% NS 81.5% 79.7%
R. africae 99.5% 97.6% 93.8% 92.7% 95.3%
R. conorii 99.5% 98.1% 92.7% 91.9% 95.3%
R. sibirica 99.5% 98.2% 93.4% 93.2% 95.6%
R. honei 99.5% 98.0% 93.2% 92.3% 96.0%
R. slovaca 99.5% 98.1% 94.0% 95.6% 96.0%
R. parkeri 99.4% 98.2% 93.2% 92.5% 95.2%
R. rickettsii 99.5% 97.8% 92.9% 94.5% 95.9%
R. massiliae 99.7% 98.0% 95.8% 97.1% 95.8%
R. rhipicephali 99.7% 97.9% 95.6% 97.4% 95.7%
R. aeschlimannii 99.5% 98.4% 95.1% 96.9% 96.5%
R. montanensis 99.3% 98.3% 94.5% 96.0% 95.3%
R. japonica 99.5% 97.6% 93.4% 93.8% 96.0%
R. heilongjiangii 99.4% 98.0% 94.3% 93.8% 96.3%
R. helvetica 99.2% 95.8% NS 51.8% 89.2%
R. felis 99.5% 93.4% 53.7% NS 88.6%
R. akari 98.6% 93.4% NS 85.7% 84.7%
R. australis 99.4% 93.7% 85.2% 87.7% 86.0%
R. bellii 99.2% 85.7% NS NS NS
NS – not sequenced.
92
Figure 4.1. Unrooted neighbour-joining tree based on 16S rRNA sequences
demonstrating the relationship between Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 and previously
characterized rickettsiae.
The percentage of similarity between the species was determined using the INFOALIGN program in the EMBOSS software package (Williams, 2001). Sequence similarities were calculated based on pairwise transitions and transversions between sequences. Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA version 2.1 (Kumar et al., 2001). Evolutionary distance matrices were determined using Kimura 2-parameter methods (Kimura, 1980). Bootstrap values were obtained for a consensus tree based on 1000 randomly generated trees using the same program. Scale indicates percentage divergence. Bootstrap values >70% are indicated at the nodes. The strain of interest in this study is highlighted in red, the other species of rickettsiae recorded in Australia are highlighted in blue.
R. parkeri R. sibirica
R. conorii
R. africae R. rickettsii R. honei
R. slovaca R. japonica
R. heilongjiangii R. montanensis
Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 R. aeschlimannii
R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
R. prowazekii R. typhi
R. helvetica R. felis
R. bellii R. akari
R. australis
100
93
0.2%
93
Figure 4.2. Neighbour-joining tree based on gltA gene sequences demonstrating the
relationship between Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 and previously characterised rickettsiae.
Scale indicates percentage divergence. Bootstrap values >70% are indicated at the nodes. The strain of
interest in this study is highlighted in red, the other species of rickettsiae recorded in Australia are
highlighted in blue.
.
R. rickettsii R. conorii R. honei
R. africae R. sibirica R. parkeri R. slovaca
R. japonica R. heilongjiangii
R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 R. montanensis
R. helvetica R. felis
R. akari R. australis R. prowazekii R. typhi
R. bellii 100
99 98
87 94
97
98
99 78
2%
94
Figure 4.3. Neighbour-joining tree based on ompA gene sequences demonstrating the
relationship between Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 and previously characterised rickettsiae.
Scale indicates percentage divergence. Bootstrap values >70% are indicated at the nodes. The strain of
interest in this study is highlighted in red, the other species of rickettsiae recorded in Australia are
highlighted in blue.
.
R. africae R. parkeri
R. sibirica R. conorii
R. slovaca R. honei
R. rickettsii R. japonica
R. heilongjiangii R. aeschlimannii
R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 R. montanensis
R. australis
93 100
100
98 99
71
2%
95
Figure 4.4. Neighbour-joining tree based on ompB gene sequences demonstrating the
relationship between Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 and previously characterised rickettsiae.
Scale indicates percentage divergence. Bootstrap values >70% are indicated at the nodes. The strain of
interest in this study is highlighted in red, the other species of rickettsiae recorded in Australia are
highlighted in blue.
.
R. africae R. parkeri
R. sibirica R. mongolotimonae
R. conorii R. slovaca R. rickettsii
R. honei R. japonica R. heilongjiangii
Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 R. montanensis
R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
R. akari R. australis
R. prowazekii R. typhi 100
98
100
97
96 88
76 99
99
71
5%
96
Error!
Figure 4.5. Neighbour-joining tree based on sca4 sequences demonstrating the
relationship between Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 and previously characterised rickettsiae.
Scale indicates percentage divergence. Bootstrap values >70% are indicated at the nodes. The strain of
interest in this study is highlighted in red, the other species of rickettsiae recorded in Australia are
highlighted in blue.
.
R. conorii R. parkeri R. sibirica R. africae
R. slovaca R rickettsii R. honei R. japonica
R. heilongjiangii R. montanensis R. aeschlimannii
R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 R. felis
R. akari R. australis
R. helvetica R. prowazekii
R. typhi 100
100 99
100
97 81
74
84
5%
97
4.4 DISCUSSION
These results demonstrate that Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 is sufficiently divergent to
be classified as a novel species and they also provide some information on the
possible origin of the species and the evolutionary route that Rickettsia sp. strain
BWI-1 may have taken from its ancestors.
Although bootstrap support for the phylogenetic position of Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-
1 is not strong (>70) for most of the gene sequences examined, its placement is fairly
consistent when examining different genes with different evolutionary origins, giving
weight to the results.
Taking all the gene sequences into account, Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 is more
closely related to members of the R. massiliae subgroup of the SFG than to the
Australian SFG species. This is not totally unexpected however as previous studies
have found that the other species of Australian SFG rickettsiae are also quite distinct
from one another. Rickettsia australis is a comparatively divergent member of the
SFG while R. honei is closely related to species in the core SFG branch in
phylogenetic analyses. It is estimated that that the divergence of R. honei and R.
australis occurred 65 million years ago (Stenos et al., 1998). It seems unlikely
therefore that rickettsiae in the eastern states of Australia evolved from a recent
common ancestor as might be expected given their close proximity, instead it has
been suggested that the occurrence of R. honei in southeast Australia could be the
result of migrating birds carrying infected ticks (Stenos et al., 1998).
98
Similarly, it also seems likely that Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 does not share a recent
common ancestor, and has not evolved in parallel, with either of the recognised
Australian species of SFG. An alternative explanation for its occurrence must
therefore be hypothesised. Of interest is that Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 occurs both
on the mainland of WA and on Barrow Island, which has been separated from the
mainland since the last ice age approximately 8000 years ago. It therefore represents a
rickettsia that has not evolved significantly during this time. Alternatively, a breach in
BWI quarantine may have occurred, with ticks moving off BWI onto the mainland or
vice versa. Due to the wide range of this rickettsial species however, the most likely
scenario is that the species was present in WA prior to the island being formed.
A closer examination of the SFG subgroup with which Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1
clusters provides some information on its characteristics and possible evolutionary
route. The R. massiliae subgroup contains rickettsiae of unknown (R. rhipicephali and
R. montanensis), or recently recognised, pathogenicity (R. massiliae, R. massiliae
strain Bar 29 and R. aeschlimannii). Rickettsia massiliae DNA was recently identified
in the blood of an Italian man who had presented with an eschar and macropapular
rash 20 years previously. A rickettsia had been cultured and stored from a blood
sample collected at the time of presentation, making this retroactive study possible
(Vitale et al., 2005). Rickettsia massiliae strain Bar 29 has been detected in tick
saliva, and a human serosurvey performed in Spain identified R. massiliae strain Bar
29 antibodies, both of these factors imply a possible pathogenic role although no
human cases have been reported to date (Parola et al., 2005). The pathogenicity of R.
aeschlimannii was not established until 2002 when an infection was reported in a
patient returning from Morocco to France. An infection was later reported from a
99
patient in South Africa. Rickettsia aeschlimannii produces a disease characterized by
an eschar, fever and a generalized maculopapular skin rash (Roux et al., 1997;
Cardenosa et al., 2003; Raoult, 2004).
Members of the R. massiliae subgroup of SFG have been identified in Europe, Africa,
North and South America, the Astrakhan region, Siberia, Kazakhstan, Thailand and
Japan (Babalis et al., 1994; Beati et al., 1996; Azad and Beard, 1998; Rydkina et al.,
1999; Bernasconi et al., 2002; Pertorius and Birtles, 2002; Satoh et al., 2002;
Cardenosa et al., 2003; Parola et al., 2003; Ammerman et al., 2004; Morita et al.,
2004; Labruna et al., 2005; Eremeeva et al., 2006). These last three locations are the
closest geographically to Western Australia and although it has been suggested that
rickettsiae readily switch to different tick hosts over evolutionary time (Weller et al.,
1998), the rickettsiae in Kazakhstan were detected in Haemaphysalis spp. tick vectors
and those in Japan were detected in Amblyomma spp. which are both genera of vectors
from which Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 has been amplified in this study. The
Rickettsia spp. identified in Thailand were detected in Dermacentor spp. (Parola et
al., 2003). It is possible that the presence of closely related species of rickettsiae in
Kazakhstan, Thailand, Japan and Australia may be the result of dissemination of tick
vectors (not necessarily this particular tick species) through the movement of
migratory birds as suggested in other instances (Stenos et al., 1998; Kelly, 2006;
Santos-Silva et al., 2006).
The pathogenic potential of Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 is, at this stage unknown.
Although several people working on Barrow Island have presented with influenza-like
clinical signs and rash characteristic of a rickettsiosis (J. Drummond, pers. comm.,
100
2003) diagnostic confirmation was not performed at the time. The R. massiliae
subgroup contains rickettsiae of both known and unknown pathogenicity however, the
pathogenic members were initially classified as rickettsiae of unknown pathogenicity
before subsequent reclassification. Another factor that increases the likelihood that
Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 is a human pathogen is its presence in an anthropophilic
tick species, Amblyomma triguttatum (Roberts, 1970; Pearce and Grove, 1987; Storer
et al., 2005). The statement has been made that all rickettsiae utilising tick vectors that
feed on people are capable of infecting people (Raoult, 2004).
It has been speculated previously that a mechanism exists by which non-pathogenic
symbiotic rickettsiae that possess an ompA gene may evolve into pathogenic strains
through changes in their outer membrane proteins (Weller et al., 1998), so even if
evidence to support the pathogenicity of Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1 is lacking in this
study this is by no means conclusive, and does not discount the need for further
research on the rickettsia and its possible disease syndromes.
Description of a new species:
Given the results of experiments detailed in this chapter, we therefore propose the
creation of a new species name for Rickettsia sp. strain BWI-1: Rickettsia gravesii
(graves.i.i. L. gen. n. gravesii) after Stephen Graves, an Australian pathologist and
microbiologist who is the founder and director of The Australian Rickettsial
Reference Laboratory and who has a long history of promoting and contributing to
Australian rickettsial research.
101
Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov. grows on XTC-2 cells at 28°C in Leibovitz L-15 media
supplemented with 5% foetal calf serum, 0.4% tryptose phosphate and 200mM L-
glutamine.
The type strain is strain BWI-1. This was isolated from an Amblyomma triguttatum
tick from Barrow Island, Western Australia in 2004 and the isolate has been deposited
in the Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory collection. Preparations are
underway to also deposit it in the Collection de souches de L’Unité des Rickettsies
(CSUR), World Health Organization Collaborative Center for Rickettsioses,
Borrelioses and Tick-borne Infections, Marseilles, France.
102
CHAPTER 5
DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF NOVEL
RICKETTSIAE FROM YELLOW -FOOTED
ANTECHINUSES
5.1 INTRODUCTION
The role of wildlife as reservoirs of rickettsioses and bartonelloses has been widely
documented from many countries, however it is still poorly understood in Australia
(Niebylski et al., 1999; Birtles et al., 2001; Boostrom et al., 2002; Jacomo et al.,
2002; Holmberg et al., 2003; Bown et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2006). Yellow-footed
antechinuses (mardos, Antechinus flavipes) are small, mainly insectivorous marsupials
that are native to Australia. There are several subspecies and these are found in a
variety of habitats across Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia
and the southwest of WA. All the males of the species die after two weeks of
intensive mating activity in August (Menkhorst and Knight, 2001). The male
mortality is precipitated by a failure of the animals’ glucocorticoid feedback
mechanism. The resulting excess of corticosteroids produces immunosuppression and
other stress-related pathology including gastric bleeding, negative nitrogen balance
and hypoglycaemia (McAllan et al., 1998).
During a concurrent study to examine the ecology of yellow-footed antechinuses,
ectoparasites were collected and a novel rickettsia (Rickettsia sp. strain D-1) was
identified (described in Chapter 3). The aim of this section of the study was to further
103
characterize Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 and to determine whether yellow-footed
antechinuses and their ectoparasites harbour other potentially zoonotic rickettsiae.
5.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
5.2.1 Sample collection
Additional trapping was performed in dry sclerophyll forests surrounding the town of
Dwellingup in the southwest of WA, an area of interest identified in chapter 2 and 3.
The methods used for trapping and ectoparasite removal have been described
previously in Chapter 2.
5.2.2 Ectoparasite identification
Ticks were identified by light microscopy according to a standard key (Roberts,
1970). Similarly, fleas were identified using light microscopy and a standard
taxonomic key (Dunnet and Mardon, 1974).
5.2.3 Cell culture
Culture from the tick samples was attempted. The methods for cell culture are
described in section 4.2.2.
5.2.4 DNA extraction
The protocol for extraction of DNA from ticks has been described in Chapter 3.
DNA was extracted from the fleas using Qiagen minikis. Up to five fleas from an
individual animal were pooled to increase the efficiency of the screening process.
DNA was extracted from fleas following the manufacturer’s tissue protocol, with the
exception that the DNA was stored in 70 µL of elution buffer rather than 200µL as
104
recommended by the manufacturer. This modification was made in order to increase
the final concentration of DNA.
5.2.5 PCR screening
The methods used for PCR screening have been described previously in Chapter 3.
5.2.6 Sequencing
The methods used for sequencing have been described previously in Chapter 4. The
sequences generated were initially compared to those in Genbank using the BLAST
program. Samples that showed sequences similar to those of previously characterized
SFG rickettsiae were further sequenced using gltA, ompA and ompB gene primers. If
the BLAST analysis indicated that the positive sample was a Bartonella spp., for
which there is no amplifiable ompA or ompB gene, only gltA sequencing was
performed.
Repeated attempts to culture the Rickettsia spp. identified (Rickettsia sp. strain D-1)
from the ticks were unsuccessful therefore no 16S rRNA sequencing was undertaken.
As the 16S rRNA gene is highly conserved across the eubacteria, attempts to
sequence it directly from tick samples could result in the amplification of
endosymbionts that are often present in ticks, leading to confusing results (Edwards et
al., 1989; Noda et al., 1997; Stenos et al., 2005).
105
5.2.7 Sequence Analysis
The methods for sequence analysis have been described previously in Chapter 4.
5.3 RESULTS.
5.3.1 Prevalence
Ectoparasites were collected in 48 instances of trap success. This figure includes the
animals described in chapter 2 and 3 and animals trapped on subsequent field trips.
Thirty six individual animals were captured and this number includes initial trapping
of an animal and any subsequent re-trappings (table 5.1). Two species of flea (38/48
of the animals with ectoparasites carried Acanthopsylla jordani; Echidnophagia
perilis was collected from one animal) and one species of tick (27/48 of the animals
with ectoparasites had Ixodes antechini) were collected from the yellow-footed
antechinuses. In 17 instances, an animal was co-infected with A. jordani and I.
antechini.
Following screening with gltA gene primers, fourteen of the twenty seven animals
infested with Ixodes antechini (51.9%) had PCR positive ticks and 44.7% (17/38) of
animals with Acanthopsylla jordani had PCR positive fleas. The single E. perilis
specimen collected was PCR negative. Of the animals that were co-infected with two
species of ectoparasite, there were 6 cases of PCR positive A. jordani and PCR
negative I. antechini, 7 cases of positive I. antechini and negative A. jordani, 2
instances in which both ectoparasites were positive and 2 where they were both
negative (table 5.1).
106
Table 5.1 Results of PCR screening of ticks and fleas collected from yellow-footed antechinuses in Dwellingup, WA.
I.a. – Ixodes antechini; A.j. – Acanthopsylla jordani
Individual Number of times sampled Result for PCR screening 1 1 Negative (I.a.) 2 1 Negative (I.a) 3 4 Positive (A.j)
Negative (A.j.) Positive (A.j), negative (I.a) Negative (A.j.), positive (I.a.)
4 1 Negative (A.j.) 5 1 Negative (I.a.) 6 1 Negative (I.a.) 7 1 Negative (I.a.) 8 1 Positive (A.j.) 9 3 Positive (A.j.), negative (I.a.)
Negative (A.j.), positive (I.a.) Negative (A.j.)
10 1 Positive (A.j.), negative (I.a.) 11 1 Positive (A.j.) 12 1 Negative (A.j.) 13 2 Positive (A.j.)
Positive (A.j), negative (I.a.) 14 3 Positive (A.j.)
Negative (A.j.), positive (I.a) Negative (A.j.), positive (I.a)
15 1 Positive (A.j.), positive (I.a.) 16 2 Negative (A.j.)
Positive (A.j.), negative (I.a) 17 1 Negative (A.j.) 18 1 Negative (A.j.) 19 1 Negative (A.j.), negative (I.a) 20 1 Negative (A.j.), Positive (I.a) 21 1 Positive (A.j.) 22 1 Negative (A.j.), Positive (I.a) 23 2 Positive (I.a.)
Positive (A.j.), positive (I.a.) 24 1 Positive (I.a.), negative (A.j) 25 1 Negative (A.j.) 26 2 Negative (A.j.), negative (I.a.)
Positive (I.a.) 27 1 Positive (A.j.) 28 1 Positive (I.a.) 29 1 Positive (I.a.) 30 1 Positive (A.j.), positive (I.a.) 31 1 Negative (A.j.) 32 2 Positive (A.j.), negative (I.a.)
Negative (A.j.) 33 1 Negative (A.j.) 34 1 Positive (A.j.) 35 1 Negative (E. perilis), negative (A.j.) 36 1 Negative (A.j.)
107
Figure 5.1. Acanthopsylla jordani: lateral view.
5.3.2 Sequence similarities
The sequences from the novel strains have been submitted to GenBank (Appendix 5).
Sequencing of multiple PCR positive tick samples revealed identical sequences. The
percentage nucleotide similarity between the novel strains identified in this study and
previously characterized Rickettsia and Bartonella species are shown in tables 5.2 and
5.3.
Sequencing of the gltA gene segment from multiple PCR positive samples obtained
from A. jordani revealed that the fleas were infected with a Bartonella spp. which is
108
most closely related to Bartonella sp. strain 40 at 86.1% sequence similarity. Based
on its gltA gene, Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 is most closely related to R. aeschlimannii,
demonstrating 99.4% sequence similarity. Comparison of ompA gene sequences
demonstrates a 95.6% sequence similarity to R. massiliae and R. slovaca and it is
97.1% similar to R. rhipicephali based on its ompB gene. The phylogenetic position of
the Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 based on analysis of these genes is demonstrated in
figures 5.2 – 5.5 (and ME and MP trees in appendix 6). The phylogenetic position of
the novel Bartonella species (Bartonella sp. strain Mu1) based on gltA sequences is
demonstrated in figure 5.6.
109
Table 5.2. Comparison of Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 and Rickettsia species with validly
published names based on 3 genes.
Name GltA ompA ompB
R. gravesii 98.4% 96.3% 96.7%
R. prowazekii 92.9% NA 76.0%
R. typhi 92.6% NA 80.6%
R. africae 98.8% 95.2% 92.3%
R. conorii 99.1% 93.9% 90.5%
R. sibirica 99.3% 95.2% 92.3%
R. honei 99.1% 94.8% 93.2%
R. slovaca 99.2% 95.6% 94.1%
R. parkeri 99.2% 94.3% 91.9%
R. rickettsii 98.7% 93.7% 93.8%
R. massiliae 99.1% 95.6% 96.9%
R. rhipicephali 99.0% 95.4% 97.1%
R. aeschlimannii 99.4% 94.6% 96.3%
R. montanensis 99.2% 93.9% 95.6%
R. japonica 98.7% 94.1% 93.8%
R. heilongjiangii 99.0% 95.0% 93.3%
R. helvetica 96.6% NA 52.1%
R. felis 94.5% 53.9% NA
R. akari 93.9% NA 85.0%
R. australis 94.8% 85.2% 87.7%
R. bellii 86.8% NA NA
110
Table 5.3. Comparison of Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 and previously characterized
species of Bartonella based on gltA gene sequences.
Name % Similarity
B. quintana 84.4%
B. henselae 85.7%
B. koehlerae 85.2%
B. bacilliformis 80.2%
B. doshiae 83.5%
B. elizabethae 81.9%
B. grahamii 83.1%
B. tribocorum 82.7%
B. vinsonii 84.8%
B. clarridgeiae 84.4%
B. taylorii 83.1%
B. peromysci 35.4%
Bartonella sp. Strain 1phy 84.8%
Bartonella sp. Strain 4phy 83.1%
Bartonella sp. Strain R phy1 85.2%
Bartonella sp. Strain phy2 83.1%
Bartonella sp. Strain C4phy 83.1%
Bartonella sp. Strain C7rat 81.9%
Bartonella sp. Strain 40 86.1%
111
Error!
Figure 5.2. Neighbour-joining tree based on gltA sequences comparing the novel
strain and previously characterised rickettsiae.
Scale indicates percentage divergence. Bootstrap values >70% are indicated at the nodes. The strain of
interest in this study is highlighted in red, the other species of rickettsiae recorded in Australia are
highlighted in blue.
R. rickettsii R. conorii R. honei R. africae
R. sibirica R. parkeri R. slovaca
R. japonica R. heilongjiangii
R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae
R. rhipicephali R. gravesii
Rickettsia sp. D-1 R. montanensis
R. helvetica R. felis
R. akari R. australis R. prowazekii R. typhi
R. bellii 100
99 98
82
93
99
95 100
83
2%
112
Error!
Figure 5.3. Neighbour-joining tree based on ompA sequences comparing the novel
strain and previously characterised rickettsiae.
Scale indicates percentage divergence. Bootstrap values >70% are indicated at the nodes. The strain of
interest in this study is highlighted in red, the other species of rickettsiae recorded in Australia are
highlighted in blue.
R. africae R. parkeri
R. sibirica R. conorii
R. slovaca R. rickettsii
R. honei R. japonica
R. heilongjiangii Rickettsia sp. D-1
R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
R. gravesii
R. montanensis R. australis
94 100
100
84
93 93
75
70 99
2%
113
Figure 5.4. Neighbour-joining tree based on ompB sequences comparing the novel
strain and previously characterised rickettsiae.
Scale indicates percentage divergence. Bootstrap values >70% are indicated at the nodes. The strain of
interest in this study is highlighted in red, the other species of rickettsiae recorded in Australia are
highlighted in blue.
R. africae R. parkeri
R. sibirica R. mongolotimonae
R. conorii R. slovaca R. rickettsii
R. honei R. japonica R. heilongjiangii
R. gravesii R. montanensis
Rickettsia sp. D-1 R. aeschlimannii
R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
R. akari R. australis
R. prowazekii R. typhi 100
98
100
96 94
91 77
99
100
5%
114
Figure 5.5. Neighbour-joining tree of Bartonella spp. based on gltA sequences
comparing the novel strain and previously characterised Bartonella spp.
Scale indicates percentage divergence. Bootstrap values >70% are indicated at the nodes. The strain of
interest in this study is highlighted in red, the other species of rickettsiae recorded in Australia are
highlighted in blue.
B. bacilliformis
B. doshiae
B. clarridgeiae
Bartonella sp. Mu1
B. quintana
B. henselae
B. koehlerae
Bartonella sp. Strain40
B. taylorii
B. vinsonii
Bartonella sp. StrainC1phy
Bartonella sp. StrainR1phy
Bartonella sp. StrainC4phy
Bartonella sp. StrainR2phy
B. tribocorum
B. grahamii
Bartonella sp. StrainC7rat
B. elizabethae
B. peromysci
90
99
70
76
20
115
5.4 DISCUSSION
5.4.1 Aetiology
Attempts to cultivate Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 from ticks in XTC and Vero cell lines
were unsuccessful. This could be due to laboratory factors however it is also possible
that an inability to grow in these cell lines is a phenotypic property of the strain. This
is the case for R. peacockii, which has only been successfully propagated in tick cell
lines (Simser et al., 2001). Rickettsia sp. strain D-1 has been assigned the name
Candidatus “Rickettsia antechini” following instructions given for the naming of
bacteria that are yet to be cultured (Murray and Stackenbrandt, 1995; Raoult et al.,
2005). The culture of Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 was deemed to be outside the scope
of this project, it will be performed as part of future work.
The identification of novel Rickettsia and Bartonella species and the examination of
their evolutionary lineages increases our understanding of the natural history of the
genera, their ecology and their mechanisms of pathogenicity. As previously described,
in order to be classified as a novel species of rickettsia, Fournier et al (2003)
recommended that an isolate should not exhibit more than one of the following
degrees of nucleotide similarity with the most homologous validated species: ≥ 99.8,
≥99.9%, ≥98.8%, ≥99.2% and ≥99.3% for the 16S rRNA, gltA, ompA, ompB and sca4
genes respectively. Based on the results from this study therefore, it is likely that
Candidatus “Rickettsia antechini” constitutes a novel species, however insufficient
genotypic information has been gathered to propose it as such at this stage.
Candidatus “Rickettsia antechini” falls within the R. massiliae subgroup of the SFG,
and is closely related to R. gravesii, the other novel species identified during this
116
study. Rickettsia gravesii has also been detected in geographical locations close to
Dwellingup, the yellow-footed antechinus study site. It seems possible therefore that
R. gravesii and Candidatus “R. antechini” could have evolved from a recent common
ancestor.
The classification of the genus Bartonella is less well defined (Birtles and Raoult,
1996). It has been determined that rpoB and gltA gene sequences provide the most
sensitive indication of the phylogenetic position of a Bartonella species (La Scola et
al. 2003). The value of other genes is limited by the high degree of sequence
similarity in the gene fragments between species and the lack of sequence data across
the range of Bartonella species (Houpikian and Raoult, 2001; La Scola et al., 2003).
Phylogenetic studies based on gltA gene sequences have demonstrated a range of
similarities between previously characterized Bartonella species (from 83.7% to
93.2%) and it has been suggested that a newly detected isolate should be considered a
novel species if it demonstrates <96.0% similarity to the corresponding 327 bp gltA
fragment of previously validated species (Birtles and Raoult, 1996; La Scola et al.,
2003). Based on this criterion, Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 falls within the genus and is
sufficiently divergent to be classified as a novel species. Further characterisation
based on sequencing of the genes mentioned above (in particular rpoB) was not
performed due to difficulties in collecting follow-up samples, this should be
performed in the future in order to more accurately classify this novel Bartonella
species.
Bartonella henselae has been widely reported from Australian cats (Branley et al.,
1996; Rathbone et al., 1996) and a single case of Bartonella quintana infection has
117
been reported in an immunocompromised patient in 1996 (Branley et al., 1996;
Rathbone et al., 1996). From the sequences generated it seems unlikely that
Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 shares a recent common ancestor with other Australian
members of the genus and the Bartonella species occurring in Australia are probably
the result of multiple independent introductions.
The zoonotic potential of the two novel species identified are presently unknown. A
previous serological survey of people in the southwest of the state detected the
presence of SFG antibodies so it is likely that at least one infectious Rickettsia species
is present in the area (Kilminster T. An Investigation of Typhus in Western Australia.
Honours Thesis: Department of Microbiology, University of Western Australia;
1997). Further investigations need to be performed to determine whether the rickettsia
detected in this study is responsible for the sero-conversion or whether there are other,
yet to be isolated, species of rickettsia present.
5.4.2 Ecology
Sylvatic life cycles for infectious agents are particularly advantageous, involving, in
many cases, reservoirs of infection that are not reliant on or contained by human
activity. Both ectoparasites and vertebrates are utilised in order to maintain infection
in these sylvatic life cycles and to allow the transition into domestic life cycles.
The potential vector of Candidatus “R. antechini”, Ixodes antechini, has not been
recorded from WA previously (Roberts, 1970). In addition, there is a limited amount
of information available on the flea species Acanthopsylla jordani, which has
previously only been recorded from dunnarts (Smithopsis murina) in the Dryandra
118
Forestry Reserve (Dunnet and Mardon, 1974). Therefore we cannot speculate as to
whether Candidatus “R. antechini” and Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 are likely to occur
elsewhere in WA.
The role of the yellow-footed antechinus in the life cycles of Candidatus “R.
antechini” and Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 life cycles is unclear, as it is yet to be
determined if they are competent hosts for either of these micro-organisms (i.e.
susceptible to infection, able to support effective proliferation of the micro-organisms
and infective to the vectors for a significant period of time (Richter et al., 2000)). No
intra-erythrocytic Bartonella spp. were detected microscopically in blood smears
obtained from the ears of yellow-footed antechinus following collection of tissue
samples for DNA analysis (P. Clark, pers. comm.., 2003); however, it has been
previously noted that conventional staining and microscopy is a relatively insensitive
technique for Bartonella spp. detection and even high levels of bacteraemia can go
undetected (Kordick et al., 1999). Inherent limitations involved with working on
small native animals in the field prevented the collection of larger volumes of blood
for serology, molecular based screening and blood culture at this stage.
It has been hypothesized that co-evolution may have occurred between bacteria and
their mammalian reservoir hosts and information on novel Bartonella spp. will go
some way to proving or disproving this hypothesis (Houpikian and Raoult, 2001;
Jacomo et al., 2002). Based on the limited sequence information obtained in this
study, the Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 is most closely related to Bartonella spp. strain
40 which was detected in wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) in the United Kingdom.
This result would therefore support the hypothesis of co-evolution of bacteria and
119
host. Wood mice and yellow-footed antechinuses share many common features, as
opposed to other vertebrate hosts used by Bartonella spp. such as dogs and coyotes
(B. visonii subsp. berkhoffii), cattle (B. bovis), humans (B. quintana and B.
bacilliformis) and cats (B. koehlerae, B. clarridgeiae, B. henselae and B. bovis)
(Breitschwerdt and Kordick, 2000; Jacomo et al., 2002).
It would also be interesting to examine the role of rickettsiae and Bartonella spp. in
the annual male yellow-footed antechinus die off. It has been demonstrated that some
Bartonella and Rickettsia spp. can be pathogenic to their vertebrate hosts (Kelly et al.,
1992a; O'Reilly et al., 1999; Paddock et al., 2002), and it is therefore possible that
infection with these agents could contribute to the demise of severely
immunosuppressed male yellow-footed antechinuses.
The zoonotic potential of Candidatus “R. antechini” and Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 is
unknown. As stated previously, a previous serological survey in the southwest of the
state detected the presence of SFG antibodies in human sera so it is likely that an
infectious rickettsia is present in the area (Kilminster T. An Investigation of Typhus in
Western Australia. Thesis: Department of Microbiology, University of Western
Australia; 1997). Nevertheless, further investigation needs to be performed to
determine whether the rickettsia detected in this study is responsible for this
seroconversion or whether there are other, yet to be isolated species of rickettsia in the
area.
120
CHAPTER 6
INVESTIGATION OF THE PATHOGENIC POTENTIAL
OF RICKETTSIA GRAVESII AND THE RISK FACTORS
FOR ZOONOTIC INFECTION
6.1 INTRODUCTION
Determining the pathogenicity of a novel Rickettsia spp. is an important step in
understanding its role in infections and will largely influence the nature of any future
work on the organism. The emphasis of research on pathogenic rickettsiae is more
likely to focus on their zoonotic significance, epidemiology, control and prevention,
whereas future studies relating to non-pathogenic Rickettsia spp. are aimed at defining
mechanisms that allow non-pathogenic organisms to emerge as pathogens and may
provide information on how non-pathogenic endosymbionts could be manipulated for
control of ticks and the pathogens they harbour (Simser et al., 2001).
The many technical difficulties involved in the detailed study of rickettsial gene
functions have prevented the definitive identification of their virulence factors thus far
(Renesto et al., 2005). It is not yet possible therefore to classify a novel isolate as
pathogenic or non-pathogenic based on genotypic or proteomic methods: the
pathogenicity of a Rickettsia spp. can only be definitively established after its
isolation from a patient presenting with the clinical signs of a rickettsiosis (Sarov et
al., 1992; Paddock et al., 2004).
The main objective of this preliminary study was to explore the pathogenic potential
of Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov. by investigating its links to any clinical signs reported
121
in people living or working in an area of endemnicity (as established by the work
described in previous chapters).
6.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
6.2.1 Study design
The study design used was a combined serosurvey and retrospective cohort study
using an internal control group. The serological survey was based on the collection of
one blood sample from each participant. Exposure and symptom data for the
retrospective cohort analysis were collected utilising a questionnaire.
Barrow Island was chosen as the site of the study as it provided a well-defined
geographical area with an established R. gravesii presence. The island, a class A
nature reserve, contains an abundance of native animals and therefore a large tick
population. The island’s human population consists entirely of employees of a mining
company and scientists monitoring the impact of the mining activities on the
environment, thus providing an easily contactable and organised population to study.
People who work on Barrow Island also represent a high-risk population because
much of their work is performed in the bush adjacent to the wildlife. These people are
not permanent residents on the island, instead spending a discrete period of time on
the island, usually 2 weeks, alternating with 2 weeks on the mainland. The only
criterion for participation in the study was having recently spent time on the island.
This work was approved by Murdoch University’s Human Ethics committee.
122
6.2.1 Questionnaire design
The main objective of the questionnaire was to establish whether people on the island
were being exposed to a tick-borne rickettsia and whether infection was associated
with any characteristic symptoms. The symptoms being investigated were chosen
based on descriptions of clinical signs commonly displayed by people with
established rickettsioses.
A second objective of the questionnaire was to obtain demographic information and to
identify other factors that could increase the respondent’s exposure to tick-borne
illnesses both on the island (job description, time spent on the island, time spent in the
bush and exposure to potential vertebrate hosts of ticks), on the Western Australian
mainland, interstate or overseas (Appendix 7).
6.2.3 Questionnaire administration
Two sessions were arranged with a two week interval to administer the questionnaires
(22.6.06 and 6.7.06) in order to give both shifts of workers the opportunity to
participate in the survey. A presentation explaining the project was provided for the
group, and then interested volunteers filled out the self-administered questionnaire
over approximately 20-30 minutes. Informed consent forms were signed by all study
participants (Appendix 7).
6.2.4 Blood collection
In addition to filling out the questionnaire, participants were asked to submit a blood
sample at each session, collected at the island’s medical centre by a registered nurse
hired for the purpose. Approximately 8 mls of blood was collected from each
123
participant and allowed to clot at room temperature before serum was removed,
aliquoted and stored at 4oC prior to testing. The serology was performed at the
Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory, Geelong, by Yazid Abdad, PhD
candidate, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University as part
of his PhD thesis. He kindly permitted the inclusion of his preliminary results for
analysis alongside the questionnaire. A standard micro-immunofluorescence assay
(IFA) was utilised to test the reactivity of the serum to R. australis, R. honei, R.
conorii, R. sibirica, R. rickettsii, R. akari, R. typhi and R. prowazekii antigens (Graves
et al, 1999). Although a titre of 1:64 is usually accepted as the cut-off for positive
sera, a cut-off of 1:128 was used in this study so that the influence of cross-reacting
antibodies would be minimised (Walker and Dumler, 1995; Graves et al, 1999).
6.2.5 Analysis
Microsoft Excel, SPSS 14 and Stata 9.0 were used for data management, descriptive
analysis and the calculation of logistic regression and odds ratios. Three categories of
symptoms were proposed as being consistent with a rickettsiosis and respondents who
fell into any of these categories were considered to have had a syndrome “consistent
with a rickettsiosis” and were grouped together for the analysis. The proposed
definition of “consistent with a rickettsiosis” was kept reasonably non-specific in
order to avoid false-negative results. Thus, based on a review of the literature
describing clinical signs associated with rickettsioses (section 1.1.3.3) respondents
who reported at least two symptoms from rash, fever, headache, aching
sensations, tiredness, scabbing around a tick bite or shortness of breath were
considered positive for the purposes of analysis. Respondents reporting a generalised
rash (that is, a skin reaction not in immediate proximity to the tick bite) in the
124
absence of other symptoms were also examined in a separate analysis. Actitivities and
incidents occurring the preceeding 2 years were concentrated on as it was thought that
the respondants would remember these most accurately.
The presence of a significant association between the variables “age, gender, length
of time the respondent had been working on the island, time spent in the bush on
the island, use of insect repellent and whether the respondent was frequently
bitten by ticks” and the dependent variable “symptoms consistent with a
rickettsiosis” was investigated using stepwise regression followed by binary logistic
analysis. A significant association between the same variables (and symptoms) and a
positive serology result was also investigated using binary and ordinal logistic
regression (titres of 1:128 were placed in one group, 1:256 in another and >1:256 into
the final group) and the calculation of odds ratios, both unadjusted and adjusted for
age and gender. A limitation of this study was that a comparative serosurvey on a
control group from the Western Australian mainland was not able to be performed
therefore the respondents who were not exposed to the potential risk factors in any
category were used as the reference group for the calculation of odds ratios.
6.3 RESULTS
6.3.1 Descriptive epidemiology
Approximately 30% of people on the island at the time of the questionnaire
administration session (30/100 at each visit) consented to participate in the study. The
study sample consisted of 59 volunteers and this population is described in table 6.1.
The majority of the population was male (93.0%) and over 40 years old (55.9%).
Most of the respondents had been working on the island for over 3 years (40.8%) and
most spent time in the bush everyday (45.8%). The majority of respondents recalled
125
finding ticks on themselves only occasionally after spending time in the bush (55.9%)
and 22.1% (percentage of respondents reporting symptoms after a tick bite plus
percentage of respondents with symptoms but no tick bite history plus percentage of
respondents responding positively to both these categories) of the population reported
having had symptoms consistent with a rickettsiosis. The titration results from the
serology are listed in appendix 8. Forty six percent (27/59) of the population had an
antibody titre greater than or equal to 1:128: 21/27 had a titre of 1:128, 5/27 had a titre
of 1:256 and 1/27 had a titre >1:256. On analysis, the majority of serological samples
demonstrated a higher affinity for rickettsial serotypes in the spotted fever group
compared with the typhus group.
126
Table 6.1 Description of the population of Barrow Island workers that responded to
the questionnaire.
Variable Categories % Age <28 years old 20.4 28-40 23.7 >40 55.9 Gender Male 93.0 Female 7.0 Time worked on BWI <1year 25.4 1-3 years 25.4 >3 years 40.8 Infrequent visitor 8.5 Time in bush on BWI Everyday 45.8 Often (>3x/week) 23.7 Occasionally 16.9 Hardly ever 13.9 Time in bush on mainland WA More than once per year 47.5 Once per year or less 50.8 1.7 Time in bush (other Aust. States) More than once per year 6.8 Once per year or less 91.5 Time in bush (overseas) More than once per year 11.9 Once per year or less 86.4 Tick bites Most or every time in bush 1.7 Often (25-75%) 13.6 Occasionally 55.9 Never 22.0 Don’t know 6.8 Symptoms (following bite) None or 1 symptom 84.7 Rash (not just round bite) 5.1 2 symptoms from rash, fever/chills and headache 0 Any 2 symptoms from rash, fever, headache, aching,
tiredness, scabbing, shortness of breath 10.2
Symptoms (no bite history) None or 1 symptom 89.8 Rash (not just round bite) 1.7 2 symptoms from rash, fever/chills and headache 0 Any 2 symptoms from rash, fever, headache, aching,
tiredness, scabbing, shortness of breath 8.5
Total symptoms None or 1 symptom 77.9 Symptoms after tick bite 11.9 Symptoms with no bite history 6.8 Both 3.4 Medical conditions None 79.6 Minor 8.5 Major (more systemic eg. Heart, asthma, diabetes) 11.9
127
6.3.2 Analysis of questionnaire results
Logistic regression and the calculation of odds ratios demonstrated that there were (i)
no significant associations between any of the variables and symptoms, and (ii) no
significant associations between any of the variables (including symptoms) and a
positive serology result (table 6.2).
128
Table 6.2 Summary of odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) for exposure variables versus rickettsial serology
Variable Categories Unadjusted odds ratios
95% CI
Adjusted odds ratios **
95% CI
Time worked on BWI ≤1 year (baseline)
1.00 1.00
>1 year 1.43 0.48 4.25 1.27 0.41 3.96
Tick repellent used? No 1.00 1.00 Yes 1.11 0.33 3.79 1.06 0.30 3.67
Time in bush on BWI Never/rarely 1.00 1.00 Everyday/often 2.10 0.66 6.67 1.96 0.55 6.94
Time in bush on the mainland (WA) Never/infrequently 1.00 1.00 Often (>once per year) 1.61 0.57 4.51 1.64 0.58 4.66
Time in bush (other Aust. States) Never/infrequently 1.00 1.00 Often (>once per year) 3.29 0.93 11.61 3.09 0.86 11.12
Time in bush (overseas) Never/infrequently 1.00 1.00 Often (>once per year) 0.86 0.17 4.28 0.91 0.18 4.67
Tick bites Never/Infrequently 1.00 1.00 Often 0.87 0.21 3.67 0.77 0.18 3.29 Any history of systemic symptoms following bite
No 1.00 1.00
Yes 0.52 0.09 3.11 0.44 0.07 2.66
Any history of unexplained systemic symptoms; no bite history
No 1.00 1.00
Yes 0.27 0.03 2.57 0.24 0.03 2.34
Total bites (years on island x intensity of tick bites)
Low 1.00 1.00
High 0.91 0.32 2.65 0.68 0.22 2.11
129
6.4 DISCUSSION
6.4.1 Review of major findings
A particularly noteworthy finding of this study is the high percentage of the
population with evidence of antibodies to rickettsiae. International serosurveys of the
general population have demonstrated a prevalence rate of 5% or less, therefore the
prevalence rate detected in this study (46%) suggests that there is at least one species
of infectious Rickettsia on the island. From a global perspective, a prevalence rate this
high is unusual even in Rickettsia-endemic areas, and similar rates have only been
reported in regions associated with R. africae transmission in Africa (Parola, 1999).
Thus, the findings in the study population could be the result of a very high and
continuous rate of infection, perhaps unsurprising given that most of the study
population spend a high proportion of their work day in scrub, surrounded by an
abundant, tick-carrying native animal population. The workers would, therefore, be
constantly exposed to ticks. The most anthropophilic of the tick species on the island,
the ornate kangaroo tick, Amblyomma triguttatum, has been shown to have a high rate
of Rickettsia spp. infection (chapter 3). It is also possible that the antibodies resulting
from infection persist for a long period of time.
The regression and odds ratio results indicate that there is no increased risk of
symptoms or seropositivity associated with a particular age group or sex, and that
seropositivity was not associated with symptoms consistent with a rickettsiosis
[OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.09, 3.11 (with a tick bite history) and OR=0.27, 95% CI=0.03,
2.57 (without a tick bite history)] or a history of tick bite (OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.21,
3.67) or with related variables that would increase the respondents exposure to ticks
such as the length of time worked on the island (OR=1.43, 95% CI=0.48, 4.25) and
130
the amount of time spent in the bush (OR=2.10, 95% CI=0.66, 6.67). The use of
insect repellent did not appear to have a protective effect (OR=1.11, 95% CI=0.33,
3.79).
These results suggest that the people working on Barrow Island are being exposed to a
rickettsia (or multiple rickettsiae) that produces an asymptomatic infection. Similar
results were obtained in a prospective study of soldiers who had been bitten by
Amblyomma triguttatum ticks while in the southwest of WA, an area also identified as
harbouring R. gravesii. Although no specific pathogen was being studied, no
symptomatic evidence to incriminate the ticks as vectors of disease was observed
(Pearce and Grove, 1987).
It is unlikely that the lack of a significant association between a history of tick bite
and an antibody titre is a true result, as SFG rickettsiae are transmitted, in the vast
majority of instances, via a tick bite. Although it was not overtly reflected in this
study, informal discussions with people working on the island, and personal
experience (!), indicated that a large population of ticks that avidly bite people exists
on the island, therefore it is more likely that the bites have occurred and that they have
gone unnoticed. Other studies surveying people who were most likely exposed to a
known tick-transmitted SFG Rickettsia spp. have also failed to demonstrate a
significant association between antibody titre and recollection of tick bites (Hilton et
al, 1999).
The lack of any association between age or gender and antibody titre (although there
was only a very small population of females in this study) is in agreement with the
131
results of previous studies on other Rickettsia spp.. Where people from a particular
demographic were infected more often, it was generally conjectured that this related
to participation in activities that exposed them more frequently to vectors of
rickettsiae rather than to any factor inherent in a particular age group or sex
(Aharonowitz et al., 1999; Anton et al., 2003).
6.4.2. Limitations of the study
This study was designed to gain the most informative and robust results within the
limitations imposed by the respondents’ employer. Barrow Island is remote and
flights for non-essential personal are only sporadically available, employees also work
12 hour shifts so they are not always available to attend sessions such as the ones
performed for this study. Results from this retrospective, questionnaire-based study
cannot be considered conclusive however, given that it was based on a relatively
small sample size (emphasized by the wide confidence intervals in the odds ratio
calculations) and was reliant on the accuracy of people’s recollections. It is also
possible that the clinical signs nominated as being consistent with a rickettsiosis did
not include symptoms that may have been relevant, because such infections can
manifest as a diverse range of conditions (Helmick et al., 1984; Fournier et al., 2004;
Oteo et al., 2004; Fournier et al., 2005). There was also potential in the extremely hot,
humid environment where the study was based, for relevant symptoms to be
dismissed as heat stress, sunburn, sweat rash or the result of hard manual labour. The
frequency of tick bites could also have been under-represented as they are often
painless and due to the very small, immature stages may have therefore gone
unnoticed (Gross et al., 1983; Helmick et al., 1984)
132
It is possible that there was a degree of selection bias; people who were more
concerned about tick bites (and therefore more sensitive to bites, relevant symptoms
etc.) may have been more likely to respond. It was not possible to determine whether
selection bias would have influenced the results.
Factors inherent in the serology results used in this study also prohibit the drawing of
definitive conclusions. Specificity was maximised through the use of a high cut-off
titre (so that antibodies cross reacting with non-rickettsia-specific antigens were
eliminated from consideration) (Walker and Dumler, 1995) and by the demonstration
of a higher affinity for antigens from the spotted fever group members tested than for
antigens from the typhus group members. However, results were not specific for
members within the spotted fever biogroup. It was not possible to determine,
therefore, whether the antibody titre was due to R. gravesii or to another species
encountered on or off the island. In addition, the use of a high cut-off titre increases
specificity to the detriment of sensitivity. Although this was considered a worthwhile
sacrifice in this preliminary study to minimise false positives, the low sensitivity may
have resulted in the prevalence of infection being under-represented.
If R. gravesii is responsible for the antibodies detected in this study it is possible that
it produces an asymptomatic infection. However, it is not possible to completely
dismiss the pathogenic potential of R. gravesii based on these results because of the
limitations of the study described above and the fact that asymptomatic rickettsial
infections have been recorded in other serological studies, sometimes in people
thought to be exposed to rickettsiae of known pathogenic potential such as R.
rickettsii, R. conorii and R. africae (Gross et al., 1983; Mansueto et al., 1984; Liu et
133
al., 1995). For example, in one serological and questionnaire-based study in a R.
rickettsii endemic area, 4% of the subjects were seropositive to SFG rickettsia but
none recalled having had relevant symptoms (Hilton et al., 1999). Additionally,
serosurveys performed in areas where R. africae is endemic have demonstrated that
despite a prevalence of up to 100%, reports of symptomatic infection in indigenous
people are extremely rare (Jensenius et al., 2003; Kelly, 2006). Explanations offered
for such asymptomatic infections in populations thought to be exposed to rickettsiae
which are in fact pathogenic include the development of immunity through exposure
at a young age, variation in strain virulence, and infection with an antigenically
similar, but non-pathogenic, organism (Marx et al., 1982; Mansueto et al., 1984;
Sanchez et al., 1992; Sarov et al., 1992; Hilton et al., 1999; Jensenius et al., 2003;
Kelly, 2006). Nevertheless, in the present study, workers on Barrow Island would not
have been exposed to infection at a young age (unless they were infected with R.
gravesii on the mainland), and therefore it is unlikely that they would have developed
immunity to explain the lack of symptoms recorded. It is possible however that
variation in strain virulence does occur in R. gravesii, or that some of the antibody
titres were in response to infection with another, non-pathogenic rickettsiae.
6.4.3 Public health implications of the study
This work has identified that a large proportion of the workforce on Barrow Island are
being exposed to a member of the spotted fever group of Rickettsia. Although the
findings of this study also suggest that this rickettsia produces an asymptomatic
infection, increasing awareness of the risks amongst workers and detailing measures
to limit exposure are warranted until further work is performed on the Rickettsia spp.
to confirm its non-pathogenic nature.
134
A significant association between exposure to ticks and an antibody titre was not
shown, however, as all SFG rickettsiae are transmitted by ticks it is likely that they
are also involved in transmission of the recently identified rickettsia on Barrow
Island, R. gravesii. Tick exposure can be minimised by identifying high risk areas (eg.
shady, moist environments frequented by animals) and either minimising time spent
in these areas or increasing vigilance when at risk. People entering high risk areas
could treat clothing with repellents, wear long trousers tucked into their shoes and
apply an effective repellent to exposed skin to minimise risk of tick attachment.
Clothing should be checked regularly while in tick infested areas, this is facilitated by
wearing light coloured clothes.
If a tick does attach, removing it promptly is critical, as the risk of transmission of a
rickettsia or other pathogen by a tick increases with the duration of attachment and
generally requires 24-48 hours (Gammons and Salam, 2002). Ticks are removed most
effectively using blunt, rounded forceps to grasp the mouthparts of the tick as close to
the skin as possible. Other methods of removing ticks, such as using fingers, or
irritants to kill the ticks in situ, should be avoided because they may increase the risk
of regurgitation by the tick and consequently, the transmission of infectious agents.
6.4.4 Recommendations for further research
This preliminary study has produced some interesting results however they cannot be
considered conclusive due to the reasons discussed above. Information obtained from
this study should be used in the future to design more focused and specific projects.
Further blood sampling and serology from these individuals and a Western Australian
135
based control group should be performed to determine whether the infection is current
or historical, and, together with a prospective study of new workers on the island, will
produce more robust results.
136
CHAPTER 7.
GENERAL DISCUSSION
7.1 INTRODUCTION
Spotted fever group rickettsiae are becoming increasingly recognised as emerging
infectious diseases of significance (Parola et al., 2005). As rickettsiology is a
developing discipline, new species of rickettsiae are constantly being detected and the
knowledge of established species is often revised. This study attempted to address
some of the shortfalls in our knowledge of rickettsial presence in Western Australia,
concentrating particularly on the role of native and feral animals as reservoir hosts.
7.2 FINDINGS OF THE STUDY IN RELATION TO AIMS
The overall objective of this study was to make a preliminary assessment of rickettsial
presence in Western Australia. More specifically the aims were:
Aim 1. To gain a better understanding of whether species of Rickettsia are present in
WA, with the main emphasis on the tick-borne spotted fever group.
This aim was met as two novel SFG rickettsiae [designated Rickettsia gravesii sp.
nov. (Chapter 4) and Candidatus “Rickettsia antechini” (Chapter 5)] and one novel
Bartonella species [Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 (Chapter 5)] were identified in the
study. Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov. is most closely related to the Rickettsia massiliae
subgroup of the SFG rickettsiae, demonstrating sequence similarities of 99.7%,
98.4%, 95.8% and 97.4% for 16S rRNA, gltA, ompA and ompB gene fragments
respectively. Candidatus “Rickettsia antechini” also demonstrated a close relationship
to the R. massiliae subgroup (99.4%, 94.8% and 97.1% sequence similarity based on
its gltA, ompA and ompB genes respectively). The two novel Western Australian
137
species demonstrated 98.4%, 96.3% and 96.7% sequence similarity to each other
based on gltA, ompA and ompB genes respectively. The third novel species identified,
Bartonella sp. strain Mu1, demonstrated greatest gltA gene sequence similarity to
Bartonella strain 40 at 86.1%. The close relationship between the two species of
rickettsiae detected in this study could indicate that they both evolved from a recent
common ancestor. The lack of a close genetic relationship with R. australis and R.
honei (the two documented pathogenic SFG species in Australia) however, suggests
that the species of rickettsiae in WA have evolved independently of those present in
the eastern states in recent times and probably had different routes of introduction.
This is not a surprising finding as there is increasing evidence that Rickettsia spp. are
capable of wide dissemination, illustrated by the presence of R. honei in Australia,
Thailand and the USA (Graves and Stenos, 2003). No previously characterised
species of rickettsiae were detected in the study.
Aim 2. To identify geographical areas, vectors and vertebrate hosts of interest in
local rickettsial life cycles, in particular, the role of native and feral animals
in rickettsial ecology.
The tick species identified as potential vectors of R. gravesii sp. nov. by PCR are
Amblyomma triguttatum, Amblyomma limbatum, Haemaphysalis ratti, Amblyomma
albolimbatum and Ixodes spp.. Of these, Amblyomma triguttatum is most likely to
have the greatest zoonotic significance as it has a relatively high prevalence of
infection, a wide host range and it feeds on humans readily (Chapter 3). Ixodes
antechini has been identified as a potential vector of Candidatus “R. antechini”
(Chapter 3), however, I. antechini has not been found to infest humans to date and
therefore the zoonotic significance of this Rickettsia spp. is unknown.
138
Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov. was detected in several, widely separated areas in the state
while Candidatus “R. antechini” and Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 were only detected in
Dwellingup in the State’s southwest (Chapter 3 and 5). Potential vertebrate hosts of R.
gravesii sp. nov. identified in this study (i.e. found in ectoparasites collected from the
animals but not from the animals themselves) are golden bandicoots, common
brushtail possums, burrowing bettongs, western grey kangaroos, feral pigs and bobtail
lizards (Chapter 3). The yellow-footed antechinus was identified as a potential
vertebrate host of Candidatus “R. antechini” and Bartonella sp. strain Mu1 (Chapter 3
and 5).
Early Australian rickettsiologists undertook preliminary investigations into the role of
native animals, particularly bandicoots, in the life cycle of rickettsiae, however little
work has been performed in the area recently (Campbell and Domrow, 1974; Huang
et al., 1990). The potential role of feral pigs in rickettsial life cycles has been
identified in north-eastern Spain, where Rickettsia slovaca was identified in
Dermacentor marginatus ticks removed from wild boars killed by hunters (Ortuno et
al., 2006). Strategies are already in place to control the feral pig population in the
south west of WA due to their destructive nature, nevertheless the potential role of the
population as a reservoir of R. gravesii is a finding that could contribute to the
argument for control of the feral pig population.
Although an Australian Rickettsia spp., R. honei, has been shown to be transmitted by
a reptile-associated tick, it has not yet been determined whether reptiles can function
as a vertebrate host of the organisms as their physiology is vastly different from that
139
of mammals (Stenos et al., 2003). Therefore, the potential role of reptiles and the
reptile-associated ticks Amblyomma limbatum and Amblyomma albolimbatum in the
life cycle of R. gravesii is unclear and should be investigated further.
Aim 3. To perform a preliminary investigation into the pathogenic potential of any
novel rickettsia species identified during this study.
The serosurvey performed on Barrow Island workers suggests that there is at least one
species of rickettsia infective for people on the island, an area which has been shown
to be endemic for R. gravesii sp. nov. Although these results, together with the results
from the questionnaire, imply that infection is not significantly associated with
symptoms, asymptomatic rickettsial infections have been recorded in serological
studies performed in other parts of the world, sometimes in people thought to be
exposed to rickettsiae of known pathogenic potential such as R. rickettsii, R. conorii
and R. africae (Gross et al., 1983; Mansueto et al., 1984; Liu et al., 1995). Therefore,
further investigation into the pathogenic potential of R. gravesii should be performed
before it is definitively established as a non-pathogenic species, particularly as it is
highly prevalent in Amblyomma triguttatum, a tick species that feeds readily on
humans.
Aim 4. To contribute to the body of scientific knowledge on rickettsial ecology
worldwide, in order to aid in developing a better understanding about the
genus Rickettsia.
The sequences for the novel Rickettsia and Bartonella species identified in this study
have been submitted to GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html)
(appendix 5), adding to the rapidly growing global literature on the genera (Chapters 4
140
and 5). Cultures of R. gravesii sp. nov. have been submitted to The Australian
Rickettsial Reference Laboratory in Geelong, and are in the process of being
submitted to the Collection de souches de L’Unité des Rickettsies (CSUR), World
Health Organization Collaborative Center for Rickettsioses, Borrelioses and Tick-
borne Infections, Marseilles, France. This information will be used by rickettsial
researchers throughout the world to compare rickettsial species and to determine
lineages, routes of transmission and many other factors of the epidemiology and
ecology of these fascinating organisms.
This study has provided important information on the potential routes for
dissemination of rickettsiae, both within Australia and in a global context. Results
from this study have identified ectoparasite vectors and potential vertebrate hosts of
novel rickettsiae, many of which are unique to WA and have not been investigated
thus far. The demonstration of a high prevalence of rickettsial infection in a tick
population on Barrow Island, an ecosystem where no new animals or ectoparasites
have been introduced for thousands of years, is a fascinating finding. Results from
this study have highlighted the high level of exposure to rickettsiae that has occurred
in people working in this environment, with the potential for the SFG rickettsia to be
an emerging infectious disease resulting in the incursion of humans into a new niche.
Aim 5. To contribute, through opportunistic sampling, to the current knowledge of
tick presence in Western Australia, including the species of tick present, their
distribution and vertebrate host preference.
Most of the findings from this section of the study (Chapter 2) confirmed those of
previous authors (Roberts 1970; Halliday, 2001). A novel finding however was the
141
detection of Ixodes antechini in WA. This tick species may have always been present
here and was just not detected in Roberts’ survey, however it is possible that it may
have been more recently introduced through the migration of its’ previously identified
vertebrate hosts the fat-tailed dunnart and the western quoll. In the past, migration of
tick species across the breadth of the continent would have taken a significant amount
of time. Now however, captive breeding and release programs and relocation of native
species (particularly those that are endangered) are common practices and the
potential of such strategies to also disseminate ectoparasites and any infectious agent
they may harbour should be taken into consideration.
Another unusual finding of this study was the collection of the reptile-associated tick
Amblyomma limbatum from mammals (golden bandicoots and common brushtail
possums) (Roberts, 1970). As Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov. was also detected in
Amblyomma limbatum ticks in this study (Chapter 3), it is possible that this rickettsia
is not dependent solely on a mammalian host population for its maintenance and
propagation.
7.3 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
While significant findings have been made in this study, it is highly likely that this
work represents the “tip of the iceberg” for rickettsiology in Western Australia. The
results have raised many important questions, including the zoonotic nature of
rickettsiae in WA, and there are many geographical areas, vectors and vertebrate hosts
that are yet to be explored.
142
Future work in this area should involve further attempts to culture Candidatus
“Rickettsia antechini” to determine whether culturing of this organism is possible, or
whether it is possibly a non-pathogenic endosymbiont similar to R. peacockii, which
has been unamenable to culture thus far. Mouse serotyping and phenotypic
characterization of both novel strains to support the proposal of R. gravesii sp. nov. as
a new rickettsial species will also be part of future work on Western Australian
rickettsiae as these studies were not able to be performed during the current study.
Phenotypic properties, including cell culture growth characteristics (temperature,
growth media and cell line preference) and patterns of antibiotic resistance should
also be investigated. For example, other members of the R. massiliae subgroup have
been found to be the only species belonging to a subgroup of the SFG to be rifampin-
resistant (Rolain et al., 1998). It would be interesting to determine whether the novel
strains, which appear to be part of the R. massilae subgroup, also demonstrate this
phenotypic property and have the associated genotypic characteristics.
Further investigation into the pathogenic potential of the novel strains is also
warranted, as although preliminary results suggest that R. gravesii sp. nov. results in
asymptomatic infections, this is by no means conclusive. Several cases of SFG
rickettsial infection have been diagnosed serologically in the outer suburbs of Perth in
recent years (J. Stenos, pers. comm. 2005; J. Dyer, pers. comm. 2006), therefore R.
gravesii (which has been detected in this area) or another, as yet unidentified,
rickettsia is capable of producing a symptomatic infection. Future work will hopefully
involve ongoing serological testing of the Barrow Island individuals already tested
and also people who are about to commence work on the island for the first time, in
order to identify people with a rising titre and therefore an active infection. These
143
people can then be questioned more closely about the development of symptoms.
Serosurveys in other areas of the State should also be performed in the future, adding
to the knowledge gained in this study. Attempts to isolate and sequence rickettsiae
from human blood samples and biopsies from humans diagnosed with spotted fevers
in the State should also continue so that the identity of any infecting rickettsia can be
determined. Finally, education of the medical fraternity in WA on the potential role of
rickettsiae in fevers of unknown origin could also play an important part in
investigating their role in the State.
Determining the role of the local tick species and vertebrate hosts in the rickettsial life
cycles would also provide important information that could be used to better predict
distribution of the novel strains and the risk factors for infection, as shown in previous
studies (Rehacek and Tarasevich, 1991; Mills and Childs, 1998; Kitron, 2000;
Randolph, 2000; 2004). For example, the role of the tick species as biological vectors
could be examined though the use of transmission studies or electron microscopy of
different anatomical structures. Such studies could differentiate true vectors from tick
species that have just ingested a blood meal containing the Rickettsia spp. Electron
microscopy of the vectors could also provide further supporting information on the
potential pathogenicity of the rickettsiae. Salivary gland infection would suggest that
the Rickettsia spp. can be transmitted to people during tick feeding, while detecting
the Rickettsia spp. only in the ticks’ ovaries is a finding that suggests it is more likely
to be a non-pathogenic endosymbiont (Raoult and Roux, 1997). Transmission studies
on native animals to determine which species are susceptible to infection, are able to
support effective proliferation of the rickettsiae, and are infective to vectors for
significant periods of time are not practical, however a serological test has been
144
developed to detect Rickettsia australis antibodies in native fauna and development of
a similar test for the novel strains may be possible (Huang et al., 1990). Continued
screening of ticks collected from animals in the State will continue to provide
information on the distribution and prevalence of the novel strains and may also detect
the presence of other novel species.
In conclusion, this “pioneer” study in Western Australia has just scraped the surface
of this fascinating genus and the results suggest that there is tremendous scope for
further exciting and enlightening work to be performed in the area of rickettsiology in
this geographically isolated region in the future.
145
REFERENCES
Adams, J., Schmidtmann, E., and Azad, A. (1990) Infection of colonized cat fleas,
Ctenocephalides felis (Bouche), with a rickettsia-like microorganism. American
Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 22: 400-409.
Aharonowitz, G., Koton, S., Segal, Anis, E. and Green, M. (1999) Epidemiological
characteristics of spotted fever in Israel over 26 years. Clinical Infectious Diseases.
29: 1321-1322.
Ammerman, N., Swanson, K., Anderson, J., Schwartz, T., Seaberg, E., Glass, G. and
Norris, D. (2004) Spotted-fever group Rickettsia in Dermacentor variabilis,
Maryland. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 10: 1478-1480.
Anderson, B., and Neuman, M. (1997) Bartonella spp. as emerging human pathogens.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 10: 203-219.
Anderson, B., and Tzianabos, T. (1989) Comparative sequence analysis of a genus-
common rickettsial antigen gene. Journal of Bacteriology. 171: 5199-5201.
Andersson, J., and Andersson, S. (1999) Genome degradation is an ongoing process
in Rickettsia. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 16: 1178-1191.
Andrew, R., Bonnin, J., and Williams, S. (1946) Tick typhus in north Queensland.
The Medical Journal of Australia. II : 253-258.
146
Antón, E., Font, B., Muñoz, T., Sanfeliu, I., and Segura, F. (2003) Clinical and
laboratory characteristics of 144 patients with Mediterranean spotted fever. European
Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 22: 126-128.
Araki, M., Takatsuka, K., Kawamura, J., and Kanno, Y. (2002) Japanese spotted fever
involving the central nervous system: two case reports and a literature review. Journal
of Clinical Microbiology. 40: 3874-3876.
Ash, M., and Smithurst, B. (1995) A case of Queensland tick typhus. The Medical
Journal of Australia. 163: 167.
Azad, A. (1990) Epidemiology of murine typhus. Annual Review of Entomology. 35:
553-569.
Azad, A., and Beard, C. (1998) Rickettsial pathogens and their arthropod vectors.
Emerging Infectious Diseases. 4: 179-186.
Azad, A., Webb, L., Carl, M., and Dasch, G. (1990) Detection of rickettsiae in
arthropod vectors using the polymerase chain reaction. Annals of the New York
Academy of Science. 590: 557-563.
Babalis, T., Tselentis, Y., Roux, V., Psaroulaki, A. and Raoult, D. (1994) Isolation
and identification of a rickettsial strain related to Rickettsia massiliae in Greek ticks.
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 50: 365-372.
147
Bacellar, F., Beati, L., França, A., Poças, J., Regnery, R. and Filipe. A. (1999) Israeli
spotted fever rickettsia (Rickettsia conorii complex) associated with human disease in
Portugal. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 5: 835-836.
Baird, R., Lloyd, M., Stenos, J., Ross, B., Stewart, R. and Dwyer, B. (1992)
Characterization and comparison of Australian human spotted fever group rickettsiae.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 30: 2896-2902.
Baird, R., Stenos, J., Stewart, R., Hudson, B., Lloyd, M., Aiuto, S. and Dwyer, B.
(1996) Genetic variation in Australian spotted fever group rickettsiae. Journal of
Clinical Microbiology. 34: 1526-1530.
Baldridge, G., Burkhardt, N., Simser, J., Kurtti, T. and Munderloh, U. (2004)
Sequence and expression analysis of the ompA gene of Rickettsia peacockii, an
endosymbiont of the Rocky Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni. Applied
and Environmental Microbiology. 70: 6628-6636.
Beaman, M., and Marinovitch, N. (1999) Murine typhus in metropolitan Perth. The
Medical Journal of Australia. 170: 93-94.
Beati, L., Finidori, J., Gilot, B. and Raoult, D. (1992) Comparison of serologic typing,
sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis protein analysis, and
genetic restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of
rickettsiae: characterization of two new rickettsial strains. Journal of Clinical
148
Microbiology. 30: 1922-1930.
Beati, L., Humair, P., Aeschlimann, A. and Raoult, D. (1994) Identification of spotted
fever group rickettsiae isolated from Dermacentor marginatus and Ixodes ricinus
ticks collected in Switzerland. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
51: 138-148.
Beati, L., Kelly, P., Matthewman, L., Mason, P. and Raoult, D. (1995) Prevalence of
rickettsia-like organisms and spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks (Acari: Ixodidae)
from Zimbabwe. Journal of Medical Entomology. 32: 787-792.
Beati, L., Péter, O., Burgdorfer, W., Aeschlimann, A. and Raoult, D. (1993)
Confirmation that Rickettsia helvetica sp. nov. is a distinct species of the spotted fever
group of rickettsiae. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 43: 521-526.
Beati, L., and Raoult, D. (1993) Rickettsia massiliae sp. nov., a new spotted fever
group rickettsia. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 43: 839-840.
Beati, L., Roux, V., Ortuño, A., Castella, J., Segura Porta, F. and Raoult, D. (1996)
Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of spotted fever group rickettsiae isolated
from Catalan Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 34:
2688-2694.
149
Belan, I. and Bull, C, (1995) Host-seeking behaviour by Australian ticks (Acari:
Ixodidae) with differing host specificites. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 19:
221-232.
Bernabeu-Wittel, M., Villanueva-Marcos, J., de Alarcón-González, A. and Pachón, J.
(1998) Septic shock and multiorganic failure in murine typhus. European Journal of
Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 17: 131-132.
Bernasconi, M., Casati, S., Péter, O. and Piffaretti, J. (2002) Rhipicephalus ticks
infected with Rickettsia and Coxiella in southern Switzerland (Canton Ticino).
Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2: 111-120.
Birtles, R., Hazel, S., Bennett, M., Bown, K., Raoult, D. and Begon, M. (2001)
Longitudinal monitoring of the dynamics of infections due to Bartonella species in
UK woodland rodents. Epidemiology and Infection. 126: 323-329.
Birtles, R., and Raoult, D. (1996) Comparison of partial citrate synthase gene (gltA)
sequences for phylogenetic analysis of Bartonella species. International Journal of
Systematic Bacteriology. 46: 891-897.
Boostrom, A., Beier, M., Macaluso, J., Macaluso, K., Sprenger, D., Hayes, J.,
Radulovic, S. and Azad, A. (2002) Geographic association of Rickettsia felis infected
opossums with human murine typhus, Texas. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 8: 549-
554.
150
Bouyer, D., Stenos, J., Crocquet-Valdes, P., Moron, C., Popov, V., Zavala-Velazquez,
J., Foil, L., Stothard, D., Azad, A. and Walker, D. (2001) Rickettsia felis: molecular
characterization of a new member of the spotted fever group. International Journal of
Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 51: 339-347.
Bown, K., Bennett, M., and Begon, M. (2004) Flea-borne Bartonella grahamii and
Bartonella taylorii in bank voles. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 10: 684-687.
Branley, J. (1997) High prevalence of Bartonella henselae in Australian cats.
Pathology. 29: 334.
Branley, J., Wolfson, C., Waters, P., Gottlieb, T. and Bradbury, R. (1996) Prevalence
of Bartonella henselae bacteraemia, the causative agent of cat scratch disease, in an
Australian cat population. Pathology. 28: 262-265.
Breitschwerdt, E., and Kordick, D. (2000) Bartonella infection in animals: carriership,
reservoir potential, pathogenicity, and zoonotic potential for human infection. Clinical
Microbiology Reviews. 13: 428-438.
Brody, J. (1946) A case of tick typhus in north Queensland. The Medical Journal of
Australia. 1: 511-513.
Burnet, F. (1942) The rickettsial diseases in Australia. The Medical Journal of
Australia. II : 129-134.
151
Campbell, R., Abeywickrema, P. and Fenton, C. (1979). Queensland tick typhus in
Sydney: a new endemic focus. The Medical Journal of Australia. 1: 350-351.
Campbell, R., and Domrow, R. (1974) Rickettsioses in Australia: isolation of
Rickettsia tsutsugamushi and R. australis from naturally infected arthropods.
Transactions of the Royal Scoiety of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 68: 397-402.
Cardeñosa, N., Segura, F. and Raoult, D. (2003) Serosurvey among Mediterranean
spotted fever patients of a new spotted fever group rickettsial strain (Bar29).
European Journal of Epidemiology. 18: 351-356.
Carl, M., Tibbs, C., Dobson, M., Paparello, S. and Dasch, G. (1990) Diagnosis of
acute typhus infection using the polymerase chain reaction. The Journal of Infectious
Diseases. 161: 791-793.
Chae, J., Kim, C., Kim, E., Hur, E., Klein, T., Kang, T., Lee, H. and Song, J. (2003)
Molecular epidemiological study for tick-borne disease (Ehrlichia and Anaplasma
spp.) surveillance at selected U.S. military training sites/installations in Korea. Annals
of the New York Academy of Science. 990: 118-125.
Chen, M., Fan, M., Bi, D., Zhang, J. and Chen, X. (1998) Sequence analysis of a
fragment of rompA gene of several isolates of spotted fever group rickettsiae from
China. Acta Virologica. 42: 91-93.
Chi, W., Huang, J. Sung, J., Lan, R., Ko, W. and Chen, F. (1997) Scrub typhus
152
associated with multiorgan failure: a case report. Scandanavian Journal of Infectious
Diseases. 29: 634-635.
Chin, R., and Jennens, I. (1995) Rickettsial spotted fever in Tasmania. The Medical
Journal of Australia. 162: 669.
Chiya, S., Takahashi, N., Yasuoka, T., Komatsu, T. and Suzuki, H. (2000) Japanese
spotted fever cases in Kochi Prefecture. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. 53.
Choi, Y., Jang, W., Kim, J., Ryu, J., Lee, S., Park, K., Paik, H., Koh, Y., Choi, M. and
Kim, I. (2005) Spotted fever group and typhus group rickettsioses in humans, South
Korea. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 11: 237-244.
Comer, J., Diaz, T., Vlahov, D., Monterroso, E. and Childs, J. (2001) Evidence of
rodent-associated Bartonella and Rickettsia infections among intravenous drug users
from central and east Harlem, New York City. American Journal of Tropical
Medicine and Hygiene. 65: 855-860.
Comer, J., Tzianabos, T., Flynn, C., Vlahov, D. and Childs, J. (1999) Serologic
evidence of rickettsialpox (Rickettsia akari) infection among intravenous drug users
in inner-city Baltimore, Maryland. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and
Hygiene. 60: 894-898.
Cook, C. (1944). Observations on the epidemiology of scrub typhus. The Medical
Journal of Australia: 539-545.
153
Currie, B., O'Connor, L., and Dwyer, B. (1993) A new focus of scrub typhus in
tropical Australia. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 49: 425-429.
Derrick, E. (1957) The challenge of north Queensland fevers. Australasian Annals of
Medicine. 6: 173-187.
Derrick, E. (1961) The incidence and distribution of scrub typhus in north
Queensland. Australasian Annals of Medicine. 10: 256-267.
Derrick, E., and Pope, J. (1960) Murine typhus, mice, rats and fleas on the Darling
Downs. The Medical Journal of Australia. 2: 924-927.
Devine, J. (2003) A review of scrub typhus management in 2000-2001 and
implications for soldiers. Journal of Rural and Remote Environmental Health. 2: 14-
20.
Díaz-Montero, C., Feng, H., Crocquet-Valdes, P. and Walker, D. (2001) Identification
of protective components of two major outer membrane proteins of spotted fever
group rickettsiae. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 65: 371-378.
Dunnet, GM and Nardon, DK (1974). A Monograph of Australian Fleas
(Siphonaptera). Australian Journal of Zoology Supplementary Series. 22: 1–273.
Dupont, H., Cornet, J. and Raoult, D. (1994) Identification of rickettsiae from ticks
154
collected in the Central African Republic using the polymerase chain reaction.
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 50: 373-380.
Dwyer, B., Graves, S., McDonald, M., Yung, A., Doherty, R. and McDonald, J.
(1991) Spotted fever in East Gippsland, Victoria: a previously unrecognized focus of
rickettsial infection. The Medical Journal of Australia. 154: 121-125.
Dyer, J., Einsiedel, L., Ferguson, P., Lee, A., Unsworth, N., Graves, S. and Gordon,
D.(2005) A new focus of Rickettsia honei spotted fever in South Australia. The
Medical Journal of Australia. 182: 231-234.
Edwards, U., Rogall, T., Blöcker, H., Emde, M. and Böttger, E. (1989) Isolation and
direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene
coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Research. 17: 7843-7853.
Emelyanov, V. (2003) Mitochondrial connection to the origin of the eukaryotic cell.
European Journal of Biochemistry. 270: 1599-1618.
Emelyanov, V. (2003a) Common evolutionary origin of mitochondrial and rickettsial
respiratory chains. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 420: 130-141.
Engels, W. (1993) Contributing software to the Internet: the Amplify program. Trends
in Biochemical Sciences. 18: 448-450.
Eremeeva, M., Balayeva, N., Ignatovich, V. and Raoult, D. (1995) Serologic response
155
to rickettsial antigens in patients with Astrakhan fever. European Journal of
Epidemiology. 11: 383-387.
Eremeeva, M., Beati, L., Makarova, V., Fetisova, N., Tarasevich, I., Balayeva, N. and
Raoult, D. (1994) Astrakhan fever rickettsiae: antigenic and genotypic analysis of
isolates obtained from human and Rhipicephalus pumilio ticks. American Journal of
Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 51: 697-706.
Eremeeva, M., Bosserman, E., Demma, L., Zambrano, M., Blau, D. and Dasch, G.
(2006) Isolation and identification of Rickettsia massiliae from Rhipicephalus
sanguineus ticks collected in Arizona. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 72:
5569-5577.
Estrada-Pen~, A. and Jongejan, F. (1999) Ticks feeding on humans: a review of
records on human-biting Ixodoidea with special reference to pathogen transmission.
Experimental and Applied Acarology. 23: 685-715.
Faa, A., McBride, W., Garstone, G., Thompson, R. and Holt, P. (2003) Scrub typhus
in the Torres Strait islands of north Queensland, Australia. Emerging Infectious
Diseases. 9: 480-482.
Fang, R., and Raoult, D. (2003) Antigenic classification of Rickettsia felis by using
monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory
Immunology. 10: 221-228.
156
Fenner, F. (1946) The epidemiology of north Queensland tick typhus: natural
mammalian hosts. The Medical Journal of Australia. 666-668.
Fernández-Soto, P., Encinas-Grandes, A. and Pérez-Sánchez, R. (2003) Rickettsia
aeschlimannii in Spain: molecular evidence in Hyalomma marginatum and five other
tick species that feed on humans. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 9: 889-890.
Forbes, G., McComish, M. and Edis, R. (1991) Rickettsial infection - how often is the
diagnosis missed? The Medical Journal of Australia. 155: 63.
Fournier, P., Allombert, C., Supputamongkol, Y., Caruso, G., Brouqui, P. and Raoult,
D. (2004) Aneruptive fever associated with antibodies to Rickettsia helvetica in
Europe and Thailand. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 42: 816-818.
Fournier, P., Dumler, J., Greub, G., Zhang, J., Wu, Y. and Raoult, D. (2003) Gene
sequence-based criteria for identification of new Rickettsia isolates and description of
Rickettsia heilongjiangensis sp. nov. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 41: 5456-
5465.
Fournier, P., Fujita, H., Takada, N. and Raoult, D. (2002) Genetic identification of
rickettsiae isolated from ticks in Japan. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 40: 2176-
2181.
Fournier, P., Gouriet, F., Brouqui, P., Lucht, F. and Raoult, D. (2005) Lymphangitis-
associated rickettsiosis, a new rickettsiosis caused by Rickettsia sibirica
157
mongolotimonae: seven new cases and review of the literature. Clinical Infectious
Diseases. 40: 1435-1444.
Fournier, P., Grunnenberger, F., Jaulhac, B., Gastinger, G. and Raoult, D. (2000)
Evidence of Rickettsia helvetica infection in humans, eastern France. Emerging
Infectious Diseases. 6: 389-391.
Fournier, P., Roux, V. and Raoult, D. (1998) Phylogenetic analysis of spotted fever
group rickettsiae by study of the outer surface protein rOmpA. International Journal
of Systematic Bacteriology. 48: 839-849.
Fournier, P., Takada, N., Fujita, H. and Raoult, D. (2006) Rickettsia tamurae sp. nov.,
isolated from Amblyomma testudinarium ticks. International Journal of Systematic
and Evolutionary Microbiology. 56: 1673-1675.
Fuentes, L. (1986) Ecological study of Rocky Mountain spotted fever in Costa Rica.
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 35: 192-196.
Galvão, M., Dumler, J., Mafra, C., Calic, S., Chamone, C., Filho, G., Olano, J. and
Walker, D. (2003) Fatal spotted fever rickettsiosis, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Emerging
Infectious Diseases. 9: 1402-1404.
Gammons, M. and Salam, G. (2002) Tick removal. American Family Physician. 66:
643-645.
158
Giammanco, G., Mansueto, S., Ammatuna, P. and Vitale, G. (2003) Israeli spotted
fever Rickettsia in Sicilian Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks. Emerging Infectious
Diseases. 9: 892-893.
Graves, S., Banks, J., Dwyer, B. and King, G. (1992) A case of murine typhus in
Queensland. The Medical Journal of Australia. 156: 650-651.
Graves, S. (1998) Rickettsial diseases: the Australian story so far. Pathology. 30: 147-
152.
Graves, S., Dwyer, B., McColl, D. and McDade, J. (1991) Flinders Island spotted
fever: a newly recognized endemic focus of tick typhus in Bass Strait part 2:
serological investigations. The Medical Journal of Australia. 154: 99-104.
Graves, S., and Stenos, J. (2003) Rickettsia honei a spotted fever group rickettsia on
three continents. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 990: 62-66.
Graves, S., Stewart, L., Stenos, J., Stewart, R., Schmidt, E., Hudson, S., Banks, J.,
Huang, Z. and Dwyer, B. (1993) Spotted fever group rickettsial infection in south-
eastern Australia: isolation of rickettsiae. Compendium of Immunology and
Microbiology of Infectious Diseases. 16: 223-233.
Graves, S., Unsworth, N. and Stenos, J (2006) Rickettsioses in Australia. Annals of
the New York Academy of Science. 1078: 74-79.
Graves, S., Wang, L., Nack, Z. and Jones, S. (1999) Rickettsia serosurvey in
159
Kimberley, Western Australia. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
60: 786-789.
Gross, E., Goldwasser, R., Bearman, J., Sarov, I., Sarov, B., Torok, V. and Naggan, L.
(1983) Rickettsial antibody prevalence in southern Israel: IgG antibodies to Coxiella
burnetti, Rickettsia typhi, and spotted fever group rickettsiae among urban- and rural-
dwelling and bedouin women. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
32: 1387-1391.
Groves, M., and Harrington, K. (1994) Scrub typhus. In Handbook of Zoonoses:
Bacterial, Rickettsial, Chlamydial and Mycotic. G. Beran [ed.], Boca Raton, Fla: CRC
Press, pp. 463-472.
Guttman, D., Wang, P., Wang, I., Bosler, E., Luft, B. and Dykhuizen, D. (1996)
Multiple infections of Ixodes scapularis ticks by Borrelia burgdorferi as revealed by
single-strand confirmation polymorphism analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
34: 652-656.
Halliday, R. (2001) 250 years of Australian acarology. In Acarology: Proceedings of
the 10th International Congress. R. Halliday, D. Walter, H. Proctor, R. Norton and M.
Colloff [eds.], Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 3-16.
Harrison, P., and Gerstein, M. (2002) Studying genomes through the aeons: protein
families, pseudogenes and proteome evolution. Journal of Molecular Biology. 318:
1155-1174.
160
Hechemy, K., Stevens, R., Sasowski, S., Michaelson, E., Casper, E. and Philip, R.
(1979) Discrepancies in Weil-Felix and microimmunofluorescence test results for
Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 9: 292-293.
Helmick, C., Bernard, K. and D'Angelo, L. (1984) Rocky Mountain spotted fever:
clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological features in 262 cases. The Journal of
Infectious Diseases. 150: 480-488.
Higgins, J., Radulovic, S., Schriefer, M. and Azad, A. (1996) Rickettsia felis: a new
species of pathogenic rickettsia isolated from cat fleas. Journal of Clinical
Microbiology. 34: 671-674.
Hilton, E., DeVoti, J., Benach, J., Halluska, M., White, D., Paxton, H. and Dumler, J.
(1999) Seroprevalence and seroconversion for tick-borne diseases in a high-risk
population in the northeast United States. The American Journal of Medicine. 106:
404-409.
Holmberg, M., Mills, J., McGill, S., Benjamin, G. and Ellis, B. (2003) Bartonella
infection in sylvatic small mammals of central Sweden. Epidemiology and Infection.
130: 149-157.
Hone, F. (1922) A series of cases closely resembling typhus fever. The Medical
Journal of Australia. 1: 1-13.
161
Hone, F. (1923). A further series of cases closely resembling typhus fever. The
Medical Journal of Australia. 1. 435-443.
Hone, F. (1927) Endemic typhus fever in Australia. The Medical Journal of Australia.
2. 213-226.
Horta, M., Labruna, M., Sangioni, L., Vianna, M., Gennari, S., Galvão, M., Mafra, C.,
Vidotto, O., Schumaker, T. and Walker, D. (2004) Prevalence of antibodies to spotted
fever group rickettsiae in humans and domestic animals in a Brazilian spotted fever-
endemic area in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: serologic evidence for infection by
Rickettsia rickettsii and another spotted fever group rickettsia. American Journal of
Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 71: 93-97.
Houpikian, P., and Raoult, D. (2001) Molecular phylogeny of the genus Bartonella:
what is the current knowledge? FEMS Microbiology Letters. 200: 1-7.
Huang, Z., Graves, S., Stewart, L., Banks, J. and Dwyer, B. (1990) Enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assays for detecting antibody to Rickettsia australis in sera of various
animal species. Compendium of Immunology and Microbiology of Infectious
Diseases. 13: 119-125.
Hudson, B., McPetrie, R., Kitchener-Smith, J. and Eccles, J. (1994) Vesicular rash
associated with infection due to Rickettsia australis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 18:
118-119.
162
Hudson, B., McPetrie, R., Ravich, R., Chambers, I. and Cross, D. (1993) Queensland
tick typhus in Sydney Harbour. The Medical Journal of Australia. 159: 356-357.
Ibrahim, I., Okabayashi, T., Ristiyanto, Lestari, E., Yanase, T., Muramatsu, Y., Ueno,
H. and Morita, C. (1999) Serosurvey of wild rodents for rickettsioses (spotted fever,
murine typhus and Q fever) in Java Island, Indonesia. European Journal of
Epidemiology. 15: 89-93.
Ihler, G. (1996) Bartonella bacilliformis: dangerous pathogen slowly emerging from
deep background. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 144: 1-11.
Inokuma, H., Takahata, H., Fournier, P., Brouqui, P., Raoult, D., Okuda, M., Onishi,
T., Nishioka, K. and Tsukahara, M. (2003). Tick paralysis by Ixodes holocyclus in a
Japanese traveler returning from Australia. Annals of the New York Academy of
Science. 990: 357-358.
Ishikura, M., Ando, S., Shinagawa, Y., Matsuura, K., Hasegawa, S., Nakayama, T.,
Fujita, H. and Watanabe, M. (2003) Phylogenetic analysis of spotted fever group
rickettsiae based on gltA, 17-kDa, and rOmpA genes amplified by nested PCR from
ticks in Japan. Microbiology and Immunology. 47: 823-832.
Jacomo, V., Kelly, P. and Raoult, D. (2002). Natural history of Bartonella infections
(an exception to Koch's Postulate). Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.
9: 8-18.
163
Jardine, C., Waldner, C., Wobeser, G. and Leighton, F. (2006) Demographic features
of Bartonella infections in Richardson’s ground squirrels (Spermophilus
richardsonii). Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 42: 739-749.
Jensenius, M., Fournier, P., Kelly, P., Myrvang, B. and Raoult, D. (2003) African tick
bite fever. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 3: 557-564.
Jiang, J., Sangkasuwan, V., Lerdthusnee, K., Sukwit, S., Chuenchitra, T., Rozmajzl,
P., Eamsila, C., Jones, J. and Richards, A. (2005) Human infection with Rickettsia
honei, Thailand. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 11: 1473-1475.
Jones, S., Athan, E., O'Brien, D., Graves, S., Nguyen, C. and Stenos, J. (2004) Murine
typhus: the first reported case from Victoria. The Medical Journal of Australia. 180:
482.
Kelly, P. (2006). Rickettsia africae in the West Indies. Emerging Infectious Diseases.
12: 224-226.
Kelly, P., Beati, L., Matthewman, L., Mason, P., Dasch, G. and Raoult, D. (1994) A
new pathogenic spotted fever group rickettsia from Africa. Journal of Tropical
Medicine and Hygiene. 97: 129-137.
Kelly, P., Beati, L., Mason, P., Matthewman, L., Roux, V. and Raoult, D. (1996)
Rickettsia africae sp. nov., the etiological agent of African tick bite fever.
International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 46: 611-614.
164
Kelly, H., Lubich, J. and O'Connor, L. (1995) Two cases of murine typhus in Albany,
Western Australia. Communicable Diseases Intelligence. 19: 370-372.
Kelly, P., Matthewman, L., Beati, L., Raoult, D., Mason, P., Dreary, M. and
Makombe, R. (1992) African tick-bite fever: a new spotted fever group rickettsiosis
under an old name. The Lancet. 340: 982-983.
Kelly, P., Matthewman, L., Mason, P., Courtney, S., Katsande, C. and Rukwava, J.
(1992a) Experimental Infection of dogs with a Zimbabwean strain of Rickettsia
conorii. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 95: 322-326.
Kelly, P., Meads, N., Theobald, A., Fournier, P. and Raoult, D. (2004) Rickettsia felis,
Bartonella henselae and B. clarridgeiae, New Zealand. Emerging Infectious Diseases.
10: 967-968.
Kim, C., Yi, Y., Yu, D., Lee, M., Cho, M., Desai, A., Shringi, S., Klein, T., Kim, H.,
Song, J., Baek, L., Chong, S., O'Guinn, M., Lee, J., Lee, I., Park, J., Foley, J. and
Chae, J. (2006) Tick-borne rickettsial pathogens in ticks and small mammals in
Korea. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 72: 5766-5776.
Kimura, M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base
substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of
Molecular Evolution. 16: 111-120.
165
Kitron, U. (2000) Risk maps: transmission and burden of vector-borne diseases.
Parasitology Today. 16: 324-325.
Knyvett, A., and Sandars, D. (1964) North Queensland tick typhus: a case report
defining a new endemic area. The Medical Journal of Australia. 2. 592-594.
Kollars, T., Tippayachai, B. and Bodhidatta, D. (2001) Short report: Thai tick typhus,
Rickettsia honei, and a unique Rickettsia detected in Ixodes granulatus
(Ixodidae:Acari) from Thailand. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and
Hygiene. 65: 535-537.
Kordick, D., Brown, T., Shin, K. and Breitschwerdt, E. (1999) Clinical and pathologic
evaluation of chronic Bartonella henselae or Bartonella clarridgeiae infection in cats.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 37: 1536-1547.
Kruse, H., Kirkemo, A., and Handeland, K. (2004) Wildlife as source of zoonotic
infections. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 10: 2067-2072.
Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Jakobsen, I. and Nei M. (2001). MEGA2: molecular
evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics. 17: 1244-1245.
La Scola, B., Davoust, B., Boni, M. and Raoult, D. (2002) Lack of correlation
between Bartonella DNA detection within fleas, serological results and results of
blood culture in a Bartonella-infected stray cat population. Clinical Microbiology and
Infection. 8: 345-351.
166
La Scola, B., Meconi, S., Fenollar, F., Rolain, J., Roux, V. and Raoult, D. (2002a)
Emended description of Rickettsia felis (Bouyer et al. 2001), a temperature-dependent
cultured bacterium. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary
Microbiology. 52: 2035-2041.
La Scola, B., and Raoult, D. (1997) Laboratory diagnosis of rickettsioses: current
approaches to diagnoses of old and new rickettsial diseases. Journal of Clinical
Microbiology. 35: 2715-2727.
La Scola, B., Zeaiter, Z., Khamis, A., Raoult, D. (2003) Gene-sequence-based criteria
for species definition in bacteriology: the Bartonella paradigm. Trends in
Microbiology. 11: 318-321.
Labruna, M., Camargo, L., Camargo, E. and Walker, D. (2005) Detection of a spotted
fever group Rickettsia in the tick Haemaphysalis juxtakochi in Rondonia, Brazil.
Veterinary Parasitology. 127: 169-174.
Lane, R., Emmons, R., Dondero, D. and Nelson, B. (1981) Ecology of tick-borne
agents in California. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 30: 239-
252.
Lane, A., Shaw, M., McGraw, E. and O'Neill, S. (2005) Evidence of a spotted fever-
like rickettsia and a potential new vector from northeastern Australia. Journal of
Medical Entomology. 42: 918-921.
167
Langan, A., and Mathew, R. (1935) The establishment of "Mossman", "Coastal" and
other previously unclassified fevers of north Queensland as endemic typhus. The
Medical Journal of Australia. 145-148.
Lee, J., Park, H., Jang, W., Koh, S., Kim, J., Shim, S., Park, M., Kim, Y., Kim, B.,
Kook, Y., Park, K. and Lee, S. (2003) Differentiation of rickettsiae by groEL gene
analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 41: 2952-2960.
Levy, C., Burnside, J., Tso, T., Englender, S., Auslander, M., Billings, S., Brandley,
K., Bos, J., Burnsed, L., Brown, J., Mahoney, D., Chamberlain, K., Porter, M.,
Duncan, C., Johnson, B., Ethelbah, R., Robinson, K., Wessel, M., Savoia, S., Garcia,
C., Dickson, J., Kvamme, D., Yost, D., Traeger, M., Krebs, J., Paddock, C., Shieh,
W., Guarner, J., Zaki, S., Swerdlow, D., McQuiston, J., Nicholson, W. and Demma,
L. (2004) Fatal cases of Rocky Mountain spotted fever in family clusters - three
states, 2003. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 53: 407-410.
Lewin, M., Bouyer, D., Walker, D. and Musher, D. (2003) Rickettsia sibirica
infection in members of scientific expeditions to northern Asia. The Lancet. 362:
1201-1202.
Liu, Q., Chen, G., Jin, Y., Te, M., Niu, L., Dong, S. and Walker, D. (1995) Evidence
for a high prevalence of spotted fever group rickettsial infections in diverse ecologic
zones of Inner Mongolia. Epidemiology and Infection. 115: 177-183.
Macaluso, K., Sonenshine, D., Ceraul, S. and Azad, A. (2002). Rickettsial infection in
168
Dermacentor variabilis (Acarari: Ixodidae) inhibits transovarial transmission of a
second Rickettsia. Journal of Medical Entomology. 39: 809-813.
Mansueto, S., Vitale, G., Miceli, M., Tringali, G., Quartararo, P., Picone, D. and
Occhino, C. (1984) A sero-epidemiological survey of asymptomatic cases of
Boutonneuse fever in western Sicily. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical
Medicine and Hygiene. 78: 16-18.
Marx, R., McCall, C., Abramson, J. and Harlan, J. (1982) Rocky Mountain spotted
fever: serological evidence of previous subclinical infection in children. American
Journal of Diseases of Children. 136: 16-18.
Mathew, R. (1938) Endemic typhus in north Queensland. The Medical Journal of
Australia. 371-377.
Matsumoto, K., Parola, P., Brouqui, P. and Raoult, D. (2004) Rickettsia aeschlimannii
in Hyalomma ticks from Corsica. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and
Infectious Diseases. 23: 732-734.
McAllan, B., Roberts, J. and O'Shea, T. (1998) The effects of cortisol and testosterone
on renal function in male Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia). Journal of Comparative
Physiology, Biochemical, Systematic and Environmental Physiology. 168: 248-256.
McBride, W., Taylor, C., Pryor, J. and Simpson, J. (1999) Scrub typhus in north
Queensland. The Medical Journal of Australia. 170: 318-320.
169
McCulloch, R. (1944). Notes on the habitats and distribution of trombiculid mites in
Queensland and New Guinea. The Medical Journal of Australia. 2: 543-545.
McDiarmid, L., Petney, T., Dixon, B. and Andres, R. (2000) Range expansion of the
tick Amblyomma triguttatum triguttatum, an Australian vector of Q fever.
International Journal for Parasitology. 30: 791-793.
Mediannikov, O., Sideinikov, Y., Ivanov, L., Mokretsova, E., Fournier, P.,
Tarasevich, I. and Raoult, D. (2004) Acute tick-borne rickettsiosis caused by
Rickettsia heilongjiangensis in Russian Far East. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 10:
810-817.
Menkhorst, P., and Knight, F. (2001) A Field Guide to the Mammals of Australia.
Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
Mills, J., and Childs, J. (1998) Ecologic studies of rodent reservoirs: their relevance
for human health. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 4: 529-537.
Morita, C., Hussein, A., Matsuda, E., Gabbar, K., Muramatsu, Y., Rahman, M.,
Eleragi, A., Hassan, S., Chitambo, A. and Ueno, H. (2004) Spotted fever group
rickettsiae from ticks captured in Sudan. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. 57:
107-109.
Munderloh, U., and Kurtti, T. (1995) Cellular and molecular interrelationships
between ticks and prokaryotic tick-borne pathogens. Annual Review of Entomology.
170
40: 221-243.
Murray, R., and Stackenbrandt, E. (1995) Taxonomic note: Implementation of the
provisional status Candidatus for incompletely described procaryotes. International
Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 45: 186-187.
Neilson, G. (1955). A case of Queensland tick typhus. The Medical Journal of
Australia. 763-764.
Niebylski, M., Peacock, M. and Schwan, T. (1999) Lethal effect of Rickettsia
rickettsii on its tick vector (Dermacentor andersoni). Applied and Environmental
Microbiology. 65: 773-778.
Niebylski, M., Schrumpf, M., Burgdorfer, W., Fischer, E., Gage, K. and Schwan, T.
(1997) Rickettsia peacockii sp. nov., a new species infecting wood ticks, Dermacentor
andersoni, in western Montana. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 47:
446-452.
Nilsson, K., Lindquist, O. and Påhlson, C. (1999) Association of Rickettsia helvetica
with chronic perimyocarditis in sudden cardiac death. The Lancet. 354: 1169-1173.
Noda, H., Munderloh, U. and Kurtti, T. (1997) Endosymbionts of ticks and their
relationship to Wolbachia spp. and tick-borne pathogens of humans and animals.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 63: 3926-3932.
171
O'Connor, L., Kelly, H., Lubich, J., Lindsey, R. and McCormish, M. (1996) A cluster
of murine typhus cases in Western Australia. The Medical Journal of Australia. 165:
24-26.
O'Reilly, K., Bauer, R., Freeland, R., Foil, L., Hughes, K., Rohde, K., Roy, A., Stout,
R. and Triche, P. (1999) Acute clinical disease in cats following infection with a
pathogenic strain of Bartonella henselae (LSU16). Infection and Immunity. 67: 3066-
3072.
Odorico, D., Graves, S., Currie, B., Catmull, J., Nack, Z., Ellis, S., Wang, L. and
Miller, D. (1998) New Orientia tsutsugamushi strain from scrub typhus in Australia.
Emerging Infectious Diseases. 4: 641-644.
Ortuno, A., Quesada, M., Lopez, S., Miret, J., Cardenosa, N., Castella, N., Anton, E.,
Segura, F. (2006) Prevalence of Rickettsia slovaca in Dermacentor marginatus ticks
removed from wild boar (Sus scrofa) in northeastern Spain. Annals of the New York
Academy of Science. 1078: 324-327.
Oteo, J., Ibarra, V., Blanco, J., Martínez de Artola, V., Márquez, F., Portillo, A.,
Raoult, D. and Anda, P. (2004) Dermacentor-borne necrosis erythema and
lymphadenopathy: clinical and epidemiological features of a new tick-borne disease.
Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 10: 327-331.
Ozturk, M., Gunes, T., Kose, M. Coker, C. and Radulovic, S. (2003) Rickettsialpox in
Turkey. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 9: 1498-1499.
172
Paddock, C., Brenner, O., Vaid, C., Boyd, D., Berg, J., Joseph, R., Zaki, S. and
Childs, J. (2002) Short report: concurrent Rocky Mountain spotted fever in a dog and
its owner. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 66: 197-199.
Paddock, C., Sumner, J., Comer, J., Zaki, S., Goldsmith, C., Goddard, J., McLellan,
S., Tamminga, C. and Ohl, C. (2004) Rickettsia parkeri: a newly recognized cause of
spotted fever rickettsioses in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 38: 805-
811.
Parola, P., Beati, L., Cambon, M. and Raoult, D. (1998) First isolation of Rickettsia
helvetica from Ixodes ricinus ticks in France. European Journal of Clinical
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 17: 95-100.
Parola, P., Cornet, J., Sanogo, Y., Miller, R., Thien, H., Gonzalez, J., Raoult, D.,
Telford, S. and Wongsrichanalai, C. (2003) Detection of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma
spp., Rickettsia spp., and other eubacteria in ticks from the Thai-Myanmar border and
Vietnam. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 41: 1600-1608.
Parola, P., Inokuma, H., Camicas, J., Brouqui, P. and Raoult, D. (2001) Detection and
identification of spotted fever group rickettsiae and ehrlichia in African ticks.
Emerging Infectious Diseases. 7: 1014-1017.
Parola, P., Paddock, C. and Raoult, D. (2005) Tick-borne rickettsioses around the
world: emerging diseases challenging old concepts. Clinical Microbiology Reviews.
173
18: 719-756.
Parola, P. and Raoult, D. (2001) Tick-borne bacterial diseases emerging in Europe.
Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 7: 80-83.
Parola, P. and Raoult, D. (2001a) Ticks and tick-borne bacterial diseases in humans:
an emerging infectious threat. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 32: 897-928.
Parola, P., Vestris, G., Martinez, D., Brochier, B., Roux, V. and Raoult, D. (1999)
Tick-borne rickettsiosis in Guadeloupe, The French West Indies: isolation of
Rickettsia africaefrom Amblyomaa variegatum ticks and serosurvey in humans, cattle
and goats. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 60: 888-893.
Pearce, R. and Grove, D. (1987) Tick infestation in soldiers who were bivouacked in
the Perth region. The Medical Journal of Australia. 146: 238-240.
Philip, R., Casper, E., Burgdorfer, W., Gerloff, R., Hughes, L. and Bell, E. (1978)
Serologic typing of rickettsiae of the spotted fever group by
microimmunofluorescence. Journal of Immunology. 121: 1961-1968.
Pinn, T., and Sowden, D. (1998) Queensland tick typhus. Australian and New
Zealand Journal of Medicine. 28: 824-826.
Plotz, H., Smadel, J., Bennett, B., Reagan, R. and Snyder, M. (1946) North
Queensland tick typhus: studies of the aetiological agent and its relation to other
174
rickettsial diseases. The Medical Journal of Australia. 2: 263-268.
Pope, J. (1955) The isolation of a rickettsia resembling Rickettsia australis in south-
east Queensland. The Medical Journal of Australia. 761-763.
Pretorius, A., and Birtles, R. (2002) Rickettsia aeschlimannii: a new pathogenic
spotted fever group rickettsia, South Africa. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 8: 874.
Punda-Polic, V., Petrovec, M., Trilar, T., Duh, D., Bradaric, N., Klismanic, Z. and
Avsic-Zupanc, T. (2003) Detection and identification of spotted fever group
rickettsiae in ticks collected in southern Croatia. Experimental and Applied
Acarology. 28: 169-176.
Quinlan, M., Chappell, T. and Golledge, C. (1993) Scrub typhus in Western Australia.
Communicable Diseases Intelligence. 17: 570-571.
Radulovic, S., Feng, H., Morovic, M., Djelalija, B., Popov, V., Crocquet-Valdes, P.
and Walker, D. (1996) Isolation of Rickettsia akari from a patient in a region where
Mediterranean spotted fever is endemic. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 22: 216-220.
Ralph, A., Raines, M., Whelan, P. and Currie, B. (2004) Scrub typhus in the Northern
Territory: exceeding the boundaries of Litchfield National Park. Communicable
Diseases Intelligence. 28: 267-269.
Randolph, S. (2000) Ticks and tick-borne disease systems in space and from space.
175
Advances in Parasitology. 47: 217-243.
Randolph, S. (2004) Tick ecology: processes and patterns behind the epidemiological
risk posed by ixodid ticks as vectors. Parasitology. 129: S37-S65.
Raoult, D. (2004) A new rickettsial disease in the United States. Clinical Infectious
Diseases. 38: 812-813.
Raoult, D., Arzouni, J., Jambon, M., Beytout, J. and Ramousse, O. (1994) Western
blot as a seroepidemiologic tool for detecting foci of Mediterranean spotted fever
(MSF). European Journal of Epidemiology. 10: 37-40.
Raoult, D., Berbis, P., Roux, V., Xu, W. and Maurin, M. (1997a) A new tick-
transmitted disease due to Rickettsia slovaca. The Lancet. 350: 112-113.
Raoult, D., and Dasch, G. (1989) Line blot and western blot immunoassays for
diagnosis of Mediterranean spotted fever. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 27: 2073-
2079.
Raoult, D., Fournier, P., Abboud, P. and Caron, F. (2002) First documented human
Rickettsia aeschlimannii infection. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 8: 748-749.
Raoult, D., Fournier, P., Eremeeva, M., Graves, S., Kelly, P., Oteo, J., Sekeyova, Z.,
Tamura, A., Tarasevich, I. and Zhang, L. (2005) Naming of rickettsiae and rickettsial
diseases. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 1063: 1-12.
176
Raoult, D., Lakos, A., Fenollar, F., Beytout, J., Brouqui, P. and Fournier, P. (2002a)
Spotless rickettsiosis caused by Rickettsia slovaca and associated with Dermacentor
ticks. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 34: 1331-1336.
Raoult, D., La Scola, B., Enea, M., Fournier, P., Roux, V., Fenollar, F., Galvao, M.
and de Lamballerie, X. (2001) A flea- associated Rickettsia pathogenic for humans.
Emerging Infectious Diseases. 7: 73-81.
Raoult, D., and Roux, V. (1997) Rickettsioses as paradigms of new or emerging
infectious diseases. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 10: 694-719.
Raoult, D., Roux, V., Ndihokubwayo, J., Bise, G., Baudon, D., Martet, G. and Birtles,
R. (1997) Jail fever (epidemic typhus) outbreak in Burundi. Emerging Infectious
Diseases. 3: 357-360.
Rathbone, P., Graves, S., Miller, D., Odorico, D., Jones, S., Hellyar, A., Sinickas, V.
and Grigg, A. (1996) Bartonella (Rochalimaea) quintana causing fever and
bacteremia in an immunocompromised patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Pathology. 28: 80-83.
Regnery, R., Spruill, C. and Plikaytis, B. (1991) Genomic identification of rickettsiae
and estimation of intraspecies sequence divergence for portions of two rickettsial
genes. Journal of Bacteriology. 173: 1576-1589.
177
Reháček, J. (1989). Ecological relationships between ticks and rickettsiae. European
Journal of Epidemiology. 5: 407-413.
Reháček, J., and Tarasevich, I. (1991) Ecological questions concerning rickettsiae.
European Journal of Epidemiology. 7: 229-236.
Renesto, P., Ogata, H., Audic, S., Claverie, J. and Raoult, D. (2005) Some lessons
from Rickettsia genomics. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 29: 99-117.
Reynolds, M., Krebs, J., Comer, J., Sumner, J., Rushton, T., Lopez, C., Nicholson,
W., Rooney, J., Lance-Parker, S., McQuiston, J., Paddock, C. and Childs, J. (2003)
Flying squirrel-associated typhus, United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 9:
1341-1343.
Richards, A., Soeatmadji, D., Widodo, M., Sardjono, T., Yanuwiadi, B., Hernowati,
T., Baskoro, A., Roebiyoso, Hakin, L., Soendoro, M., Rahardjo, E., Putri, M.,
Saragih, J., Strickman, D., Kelly, D., Dasch, G., Olson, J., Church, C. and Corwin, A.
(1997) Seroepidemiologic evidence for murine and scrub typhus in Malang,
Indonesia. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 57: 91-95.
Richter, D., Spielman, A., Komar, N. and Matuschka, F. (2000) Response to Dr.
Randolph and Drs. Gern and Humair. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 6: 659-662.
Richter, J., Fournier, P., Petridou, J., Haussinger, D. and Raoult, D. (2002) Rickettsia
felis infection acquired in Europe and documented by polymerase chain reaction.
Emerging Infectious Diseases. 8: 207-208.
178
Roberts, F. H. S. (1970) Australian Ticks. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.
Roberts, S., McClelland, T. and Lang, S. (2000) Queensland tick typhus infection
acquired whilst on holiday in Queensland. New Zealand Medical Journal. 343.
Rogall, T., Wolters, J., Flohr, T. and Böttger, E. (1990) Towards a phylogeny and
definition of species at the molecular level within the genus Mycobacterium.
International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 40: 323-330.
Rolain, J., Maurin, M., Vestris, G. and Raoult, D. (1998) In vitro susceptibilities of 27
rickettsiae to 13 antimicrobials. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 42: 1537-
1541.
Roux, V., Fournier, P. and Raoult, D. (1996) Differentiation of spotted fever group
rickettsiae by sequencing and analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism of
PCR-amplified DNA of the gene encoding the protein rOmpA. Journal of Clinical
Microbiology. 34: 2058-2065.
Roux, V., and Raoult, D. (1995) Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Rickettsia by 16S
rDNA sequencing. Research in Microbiology. 146: 385-396.
Roux, V., and Raoult, D. (1999) Body lice as tools for diagnosis and surveillance of
reemerging diseases. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 37: 596-599.
179
Roux, V., and Raoult, D. (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of members of the genus
Rickettsia using the gene encoding the outer-membrane protein rOmpB (ompB).
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 50: 1449-1455.
Roux, V., Rydkina, E., Eremeeva, M. and Raoult, D. (1997) Citrate synthase gene
comparison, a new tool for phylogenetic analysis, and its application for the
rickettsiae. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 47: 252-261.
Russell, R. (2001) The medical significance of Acari in Australia. In Acarology:
Proceedings of the 10th International Congress. R. Halliday, D. Walter, H. Proctor,
R. Norton and M. Colloff [eds.] Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 535-546.
Rutherford, J., Macaluso, K., Smith, N., Zaki, S., Paddock, C., Davis, J., Peterson, N.,
Azad, A. and Rosenberg, R. (2004) Fatal spotted fever rickettsiosis, Kenya. Emerging
Infectious Diseases. 10: 910-913.
Rydkina, E., Roux, V., Fetisova, N., Rudakov, N., Gafarova, M., Tarasevich, I. and
Raoult, D. (1999) New rickettsiae in ticks collected in territories of the former Soviet
Union. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 5: 811-814.
Saint, E., Drummond, A. and Thorbum, I. (1954) Murine typhus in Western Australia.
The Medical Journal of Australia. 6: 731-737.
Sanchez, J., Candler, W., Fishbein, D., Greene, C., Cote, T., Kelly, D., Driggers, D.
and Johnson, B. (1992) A cluster of tick-borne infections: association with military
training and asymptomatic infections due to Rickettsia rickettsii. Transactions of the
180
Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 86: 321-325.
Santos-Silva, M., Sousa, R., Santos, A., Melo, P., Encarnação, V. and Bacellar, F.
(2006) Ticks parasitizing wild birds in Portugual: detection of Rickettsia
aeschlimannii, R. helvetica and R. massiliae. Experimental and Applied Acarology.
39: 331-338.
Sarov, B., Manor, E., Hanuka, N., Sikuler, E., Galil, A. and Sarov, I. (1992)
Comparison of structural polypeptides, detected by immunoblotting technique, in the
sera of spotted fever group rickettsia positive cases - symptomatic versus
asymptomatic. Acta Virologica. 36: 57-61.
Satoh, H., Motoi, Y., Camer, G., Inokuma, H., Izawa, M., Kiyuuna, T., Kumazawa,
N., Muramatsu, Y., Ueno, H. and Morita, C. (2002) Characterization of spotted fever
group rickettsiae detected in dogs and ticks in Okinawa, Japan. Microbiology and
Immunology. 46: 257-263.
Satoh, H., Tsuneki, A., Inokuma, H., Kumazawa, N., Jahana, Y., Kiyuuna, T.,
Okabayashi, T., Muramatsu, Y., Ueno, H. and Morita, C. (2001) Seroprevalence of
antibodies against spotted fever group rickettsia among dogs and humans in Okinawa,
Japan. Microbiology and Immunology. 45: 85-87.
Schloderer, D., Owen, H., Clark, P., Stenos, J. and Fenwick, S. (2006) Rickettsia felis
in fleas, Western Australia. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 12: 841-843.
Schoeler, G., Morón, C., Richards, A., Blair, P. and Olson, J. (2005) Human spotted
fever rickettsial infections. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 11: 622-624.
181
Schriefer, M., Sacci, J., Dumler, J., Bullen, M. and Azad, A. (1994) Identification of a
novel rickettsial infection in a patient diagnosed with murine typhus. Journal of
Clinical Microbiology. 32: 949-954.
Schwartz, I., Varde, S., Nadelman, R., Wormser, G. and Fish, D. (1997) Inhibition of
efficient polymerase chain amplification of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in blood-fed
ticks. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 56: 339-342.
Sekeyová, Z., Roux, V. and Raoult, D. (2001) Phylogeny of Rickettsia spp. inferred
by comparing sequences of a "gene D" which encodes an intracytoplasmic protein.
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 51: 1353-1360.
Sekeyová, Z., Roux, V., Xu, W., Recháček, J. and Raoult, D. (1998) Rickettsia
slovaca sp. nov., a member of the spotted fever group rickettsiae. International
Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 48: 1455-1462.
Sexton, D., Banks, J., Graves, S., Hughes, K. and Dwyer, B. (1991) Prevalence of
antibodies to spotted fever group rickettsiae in dogs from southeastern Australia.
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 45: 243-248.
Sexton, D., Dwyer, B., Kemp, R. and Graves, S. (1991a) Spotted fever group
rickettsial infections in Australia. Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 13: 876-886.
182
Sexton, D., Kanj, S., Wilson, K., Corey, G., Hegarty, B., Levy, M. and Breitschwerdt,
E. (1994) The use of a polymerase chain reaction as a diagnostic test for Rocky
Mountain spotted fever. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 50: 59-
63.
Sexton, D., King, G. and Dwyer, B. (1990) Fatal Queensland tick typhus. The Journal
of Infectious Diseases. 162: 779-780.
Shpynov, S., Fournier, P., Rudakov, N., Tankibaev, M., Tarasevich, I. and Raoult, D.
(2004) Detection of a rickettsia closely related to Rickettsia aeschlimannii, "Rickettsia
heilongjiangensis", Rickettsia sp. strain RpA4, and Ehrlichia muris in ticks collected
in Russia and Kazakhstan. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 42: 2221-2223.
Silverman, D., and Wisseman, C. (1978) Comparative ultrastructural study on the cell
envelopes of Rickettsia prowazekii, Rickettsia rickettsii, and Rickettsia tsutsugamushi.
Infection and Immunity. 21: 1020-1023.
Simpson, K., and N. Day. 1986. The Birds of Australia. Lloyd O'Neil Pty. Ltd.
Simser, J., Palmer, A., Munderloh, U. and Kurtti, T. (2001) Isolation of a spotted
fever group rickettsia, Rickettsia peacockii, in a Rocky Mountain wood tick,
Dermacentor andersoni, cell line. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 67: 546-
552.
Sorvillo, F., Gondo, B., Emmons, R., Ryan, P., Waterman, S., Tilzer, A., Andersen,
E., Murray, R. and Barr, A. (1993) A suburban focus of endemic typhus in Los
183
Angeles County: association with seropositive domestic cats and opossums. American
Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 48: 269-273.
Southcott, R. (1947) Observations on the epidemiology of Tsutsugamushi disease in
north Queensland. The Medical Journal of Australia. II : 441-450.
Stenos, J., Graves, S., Popov, V. and Walker, D. (2003) Aponomma hydrosauri, the
reptile-associated tick reservoir of Rickettsia honei on Flinders Island, Australia.
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 69: 314-317.
Stenos, J., Graves, S. and Unsworth, N. (2005) A highly sensitive and specific real-
time PCR assay for the detection of spotted fever and typhus group rickettsiae.
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 73: 1083-1085.
Stenos, J., Ross, B., Feng, H., Crocquet-Valdes, P. and Walker, D. (1997) Protein
characterization of Australian spotted fever group rickettsiae and monoclonal
antibody typing of Rickettsia honei. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 35: 261-263.
Stenos, J., Roux, V., Walker, D. and Raoult, D. (1998) Rickettsia honei sp. nov., the
aetiological agent of Flinders Island spotted fever in Australia. International Journal
of Systematic Bacteriology. 48: 1399-1404.
Stenos, J., and Walker, D. (2000) The rickettsial outer-membrane protein A and B
genes of Rickettsia australis, the most divergent rickettsia of the spotted fever group.
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 50: 1775-1779.
184
Stewart, R. (1991). Flinders Island spotted fever: a newly recognised endemic focus
of tick typhus in Bass Strait. Part 1. The Medical Journal of Australia. 154: 94-99.
Storer, E., Sheridan, A., Warren, L. and Wayte, J. (2005) Ticks in Australia.
Australasian Journal of Dermatology. 44: 83-89.
Stothard, D., Clark, J. and Fuerst, P. (1994) Ancestral divergence of Rickettsia bellii
from the spotted fever and typhus groups of Rickettsia and antiquity of the genus
Rickettsia. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 44: 798-804.
Streeten, G., Cohen, R., Gutteridge, N., Wilmer, N., Brown, H., Smith, D. and
Derrick, E. (1948) Tick typhus in south Queensland: report of three cases. The
Medical Journal of Australia. 1:372-373.
Takao, S., Kawada, Y., Ogawa, M., Fukuda, S., Shimazu, Y., Noda, M. and
Tokumoto, S. (2000) The first reported case of Japanese spotted fever in Hiroshima
Prefecture, Japan. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. 53: 216-217.
Tarasevich, I., Makarova, V., Fetisova, N., Stepanov, A., Miskarova, E., Balayeva, N.
and Raoult, D. (1991) Astrakhan fever, a spotted-fever rickettsiosis. The Lancet. 337:
172-173.
185
Tarasevich, I., Shaginyan, I. and Mediannikov, O. (2003) Problems and perspectives
of molecular epidemiology of infectious diseases. Annals of the New York Academy of
Science. 990: 751-756.
Tinelli, M., Maccabruni, A., Michelone, G. and Zambelli, A. (1989) Mediterranean
spotted fever in Lombardy: an epidemiological, clinical and laboratory study of 76
cases in the years 1977-1986. European Journal of Epidemiology. 5: 516-520.
Toutous-Trellu, L., Péter, O., Chavaz, P and Saurat, J. (2003) African tick bite fever:
not a spotless rickettsiosis! Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 48:
S18-19.
Tzianabos, T., Andersen, B. and McDade, J. (1989) Detection of Rickettsia ricketsii
DNA in clinical specimens by using polymerase chain reaction technology. Journal of
Clinical Microbiology. 27: 2866-2868.
Unsworth, N., Stenos, J., McGregor, A., Dyer, J. and Graves, S. (2005) Not only
"Flinders Island" spotted fever. Pathology. 37: 242-245.
Vitale, G., Mansueto, S., Rolain, J. and Raoult, D. (2005) Rickettsia massiliae human
isolation. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 12: 174-175.
Walker, D. (2004) Ricketts creates rickettsiology, the study of vector-borne obligately
intracellular bacteria. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 189: 938-942.
186
Walker, D., and Dumler, J. (1995) Rickettsiae: spotted fever and typhus group. In
Diagnostic Procedures for Viral, Rickettsial, and Chlamydial Infections. E. Lennette,
D. Lennette and E. Lennette [eds.] Washington, DC: American Public Health
Association, pp. 575-582.
Walker, D., Feng, H., Saada, J., Crocquet-Valdes, P., Radulovic, S., Popov, V. and
Manor, E. (1995) Comparative antigenic analysis of spotted fever group rickettsiae
from Israel and other closely related organisms. American Journal of Tropical
Medicine and Hygiene. 52: 569-576.
Walker, D., and Fishbein, D. (1991) Epidemiology of rickettsial diseases. European
Journal of Epidemiology. 7: 237-245.
Webb, L., Carl, M., Malloy, D., Dasch, G. and Azad, A. (1990) Detection of murine
typhus infection in fleas by using the polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical
Microbiology. 28: 530-534.
Webster, J., and Macdonald, D. (1995) Parasites of wild brown rats (Rattus
norvegicus) on UK farms. Parasitology. 111: 247-255.
Weisburg, W., Woese, C., Dobson, M., and Weiss, E. (1985) A common origin of
rickettsiae and certain plant pathogens. Science. 230: 556-558.
Weisburg, W., Barns, S., Pelletier, D. and Lane, D. (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA
amplification for phylogenetic study. Journal of Bacteriology. 173: 697-703.
187
Weller, S., Baldridge, G., Munderloh, U., Noda, H., Simser, J., and Kurtti, T. (1998)
Phylogenetic placement of rickettsiae from the ticks Amblyomma americanum and
Ixodes scapularis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 36: 1305-1317.
Wheatland, F. (1926) A fever resembling a mild form of typhus fever. The Medical
Journal of Australia. 1. 261-265.
Whitworth, T., Popov, V., Han, V., Bouyer, D., Stenos, J., Graves, S., Ndip, L. and
Walker, D. (2003) Ultrastructural and genetic evidence of a reptilian tick, Aponomma
hydrosauri, as a host of Rickettsia honei in Australia – possible transovarial
transmission. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 990: 67-74.
Williams, S., Sacci, J., Schriefer, M., Andersen, E., Fujioka, K., Sorvillo, F., Barr, R.
and Azad, A. (1992) Typhus and typhus-like rickettsiae associated with opossums and
their fleas in Los Angeles County, California. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 30:
1758-1762.
Williams, G. (2001). InfoAlign computer program. MRC Rosalind Franklin Centre
for Genomics Research Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge.
Wilson, J., Schurr, M., LeBlanc, C., Ramamurthy, R., Buchanan, K. and Nickerson,
C. (2002) Mechanisms of bacterial pathogenicity. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 78:
216-224.
188
Wilson, K., Blitchington, R. and Greene, R. (1990) Amplification of bacterial 16S
ribosomal DNA with polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
28: 1942-1946.
Windsor, J. (2001). Cat-scratch disease: epidemiology, aetiology and treatment.
British Journal of Biomedical Science. 58: 101-110.
Winkler, H. (1990) Rickettsia species (as organisms). Annual Review of Microbiology.
44: 131-153.
Wood, D., and Azad, A. (2000) Genetic manipulation of rickettsiae: a preview.
Infection and Immunity. 68: 6091-6093.
Xu, W., Beati, L. and Raoult, D. (1997) Characterization of and application of
monoclonal antibodies against Rickettsia africae, a newly recognized species of
spotted fever group rickettsia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 35: 64-70.
Xu, W., and Raoult, D. (1998) Taxonomic relationships among spotted fever group
rickettsiae as revealed by antigenic analysis with monoclonal antibodies. Journal of
Clinical Microbiology. 36: 887-896.
Yano, Y., Fujita, H. and Takada, N. (2004) Ultrastructure of a Japanese rickettsial
strain genetically identified as Rickettsia helvetica which was originally found in
Europe. Microbiology and Immunology. 48: 535-539.
189
Yu, X., Jin, Y., Fan, M., Xu, G., Liu, Q. and Raoult, D. (1993) Genotypic and
antigenic identification of two new strains of spotted fever group rickettsiae isolated
from China. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 31: 83-88.
Zavala-Velazquez, J., Ruiz-Sosa, J., Sanchez-Elias, R., Becerra-Carmona, G. and
Walker, D. (2000) Rickettsia felis rickettsiosis in Yucatan. The Lancet. 356: 1079-
1080.
Zeaiter, Z., Liang, Z. and Raoult, D. (2002) Genetic classification and differentiation
of Bartonella species based on comparison of partial ftsZ gene sequences. Journal of
Clinical Microbiology. 40: 3641-3647.
Zhang, J., Fan, M., Wu, Y., Fournier, P., Roux, V. and Raoult, D. (2000) Genetic
classification of "Rickettsia heilongjiangii" and "Rickettsia hulinii", two Chinese
spotted fever group rickettsiae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 38: 3498-3501.
Zhu, Y., Fournier, P., Eremeeva, M. and Raoult, D. (2005) Proposal to create
subspecies of Rickettsia conorii based on multi-locus sequence typing and an
emended description of Rickettsia conorii. BMC Microbiology. 5: 11.
190
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1. ABREVIATIONS AF (Astrakhan fever) A.j. (Acanthopsylla jordani) ARRL (Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory) BLAST (Basic local alignment search tool) Bp (base pairs) BWI (Barrow Island) °C (degrees Celsius) CALM (Department of Conservation and Land Management) CF (complement fixation) CI (confidence interval) CSD (cat scratch disease) DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) DEBONEL (“Dermacentor-borne necrosis-erythema-lymphadenopathy”) Dntp (Deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate) ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) FISF (Flinders Island spotted fever) FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) gltA (citrate synthase gene) I.a. (Ixodes antechini) IF (indirect immunofluorescence test) IFA (immunofluorescence assay) IgA (immunoglobulin A) IgG (immunoglobulin G) IgM (immunoglobulin M) ISF (Israeli spotted fever) JSF (Japanese spotted fever) KDa (kilodalton) ME (minimum evolution analyses) Min (minutes) MM (millimoles) MP (maximum parsimony analyses) MSF (Mediterranean spotted fever) NJ (neighbour-joining) OmpA (outer membrane protein gene A) OmpB (outer membrane protein gene B) OR (odds ratio) PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) PCR (polymerase chain reaction) PCR/RFLP (polymerase chain reaction/ restriction fragment length polymorphism) QTT (Queensland tick typhus) RMSF (Rocky Mountain spotted fever) Rpm (revolutions per minute) rRNA (ribosomal ribonucleic acid) S (seconds) SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis)
191
SFG (spotted fever group) TAE (tris-acetate-EDTA) TG (typhus group) TIBOLA (“tick-borne lymphadenopathy”) WA (Western Australia) WHO (World Health Organisation)
192
APPENDIX 2. SAMPLE COLLECTION INSTRUCTIONS
PROTOCOL FOR ECTOPARASITE COLLECTION
Background: The broad aim of our project is to investigate the epidemiology of rickettsial diseases in Western Australia. Rickettsiae are responsible for several human diseases known to be present in this state which include Q fever, murine and scrub typhus, spotted fevers and cat scratch disease. Ticks, fleas, lice and trombiculid mite larvae are known vectors of these diseases but the ability of other ectoparasites to act as vectors has not been ruled out. We aim to achieve a better understanding of these diseases and possibly identify new ones by investigating the distribution and prevalence of infection in Western Australian ectoparasites and native and domestic animals. The vertebrate host range is also thought to be wide for many of these diseases so we will be looking at ectoparasites from any mammals/marsupials (although reptile and bird ectoparasites are worth collecting if you see them). The first step of our project will be to collect ectoparasites, which are an essential part of the rickettsial life cycle, from different regions of the state. These will be examined using a sensitive molecular diagnostic test (PCR) to detect the presence of infection. While we would like to concentrate on collection of ticks and fleas, we would be interested in any ectoparasites that were found as unknown ecological cycles may exist in WA. Suggested protocol : 1. Collect any ectoparasites with flea comb or tweezers. Hair with lice eggs on it can be cut. Ticks can be removed by grasping the mouthparts against the skin with tweezers and pulling firmly but slowly backwards until the tick is eased out of the skin. Trombiculid mite larvae are very small, red-orange and are often found in animals’ ears. The vials contain 70% ethanol as a preservative and can probably fit 2-3 ectoparasites from the same animal. Hair samples and fleas can be put in the dry containers if more convenient. 2. Record vial number, animal species and where the animal comes from on the data sheet. If possible, information such as approximate number of ectoparasites on the animal (+, ++, +++) and condition of the animal (poor, average, good) would be helpful.
193
APPENDIX 3. COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES
Black-footed rock wallaby (Petrogale lateralis)
Bobtail lizard (Trachysaurus rugosus)
Burrowing bettong (Bettongia lesuer)
Common brushtailed possum (Trichosurus vulpecular)
Dunnart (Smithopsis spp.)
Eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus)
Euro (Macropus robustus)
Fairy prion (Pachyptila turtur)
Fat-tailed dunnart (Sminthopsis crassicaudata)
Feral Pig (Sus scrofa)
Golden bandicoot (Isoodon auratus)
Kimberley rock rat (Zyzomys woodwardi)
Olive python (Liasis olivaceous)
Southern brown bandicoot (Isoodon obesulus)
Spectacled hare wallaby (Lagorchestes conspicillatus)
Western-barred bandicoot (Perameles bougainville)
Western brush wallaby (Macropus irma)
Western grey kangaroo (Macropus fuliginosus)
Western quoll (Dasyurus geoffroyi)
Yellow-footed antechinus (Antechinus flavipes)
194
APPENDIX 4. GENBANK ACCESSION NUMBERS
Table A.1 Rickettsial genbank accession numbers NA – not available Species 16S rRNA GltA ompA ompB sca4
R. prowazekii M21789 M17149 NA AF200340 AF200340
R. .typhi L36221 U59714 NA L04661 L04661
R. bellii L36103 U59716 NA NA NA
R. helvetica L36212 U59723 NA AF123725 AF163009
R. rickettsii L36217 U59729 U43804 X16353 AF163000
R. conorii AF541999 U59730 U43806 AF163008 AF163008
R. africae L36098 U59733 U43790 AF123706 AF151724
R. sibirica L36218 U59734 U43807 Af123722 AF155057
R. honei L36220 U59726 U43809 AF123724 AF163004
R. slovaca L36224 U59725 U43808 AF123723 AF155054
R. parkeri L36673 U59732 U43802 AF123717 AF155059
R. japonica L36213 U59724 U43795 AF123713 AF155055
R. akari L36099 U59717 NA AF123707 AF213016
R. australis L36101 U59718 AF149108 AF123709 AF187982
R. felis L28944 AF210692 AF210694 AF210695 AF196973
R. massiliae L36214 U59719 U43799 AF123714 AF163003
R. montanensis L36215 U74756 U43801 AF123716 AF163002
R. rhipicephali L36216 U59721 U43803 AF123719 AF155053
R. aeschlimannii U74757 U59722 U43800 AF123705 AF163006
R. heilongjiangii AF178037 AF178034 AF179362 AY260451 AY331396
195
Table A.2 Bartonella spp. Genbank Accession Numbers. Species gltA
Bartonella bacilliformis Z70021
B. doshiae Z70017
B. elizabethae Z70009
B. grahamii Z70016
B. quintana Z70014
B. taylorii Z70013
B. vinsonii Z70015
Bartonella sp. Strain C1-phy Z70022
Bartonella sp. Strain C4-phy Z70019
Bartonella sp. Strain C5-rat Z70018
Bartonella sp. Strain C7-rat Z70020
Bartonella sp. Strain R-phy 1 Z70010
Bartonella sp. Strain R-phy2 Z70011
Bartonella sp. Strain N40 Z70012
B.clarridgeiae U84386
B.koehlerae AF176091
B.peromysci AY805110
B. tribocorum AJ005494
196
APPENDIX 5. GENBANK ACCESSION NUMBERS AND SEQUENCES
OF THE NOVEL STRAINS
Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov. 16S rRNA gene - accession number: DQ269434 gttagtggca gacgggtgag taacacgtgg gaatctgtcc atcagtacgg aataactttt agaaataaaa gctaataccg tatattctct acggaggaaa gatttatcgc tgatgggtga gcccgcgtca gattaggtag ttggtgaggt aatggctcac caagccgacg atctgtagct ggtctgagag gatgatcagc cacactggga ctgagacacg gcccagactc ctacgggagg cagcagtggg gaatattgga caatgggcga aagcctgatc cagcaatacc gagtgagtga tgaaggcctt agggttgtaa agctctttta gcaaggaaga taatgacgtt acttgcagaa aaagccccgg ctaactccgt gccagcagcc gcggtaagac ggagggggct agcgttgttc ggaattactg ggcgtaaaga gtgcgtaggc ggtttagtaa gttggaagtg aaagcccggg gcttaacctc ggaattgctt tcaaaactac taatctagag tgtagtaggg gatgatggaa ttcctagtgt agaggtgaaa ttcttagata ttaggaggaa caccggtggc gaaggcggtc atctgggcta caactgacgc tgatgcacga aagcgtgggg agcaaacagg attagatacc ctggtagtcc acgccgtaaa cgatgagtgc tagatatcgg aagattctct ttcggtttcg cagctaacgc attaagcact ccgcctgggg agtacggtcg caagattaaa actcaaagga attgacgggg gctcgcacaa gcggtggagc atgcggttta attcgatgtt acgcgaaaaa ccttaccaac ccttgacatg gtggtcgcgg atcgcagaga tgcttttctt cagctcggct ggaccacaca caggtgttgc atggctgtcg tcagctcgtg tcgtgagatg ttgggttaag tcccgcaacg agcgcaaccc tcattcttat ttgccagcgg gtaatgccgg gaactataag aaaactgccg gtgataagcc ggaggaaggt ggggacgacg tcaagtcatc atggccctta cgggttgggc tacacgcgtg ctacaatggt gtttacagag ggaagcaaga cggcgacgtg gagcaaatcc ctaaaagaca tctcagttcg gattgttctc tgcaactcga gagcatgaag ttggaatcgc tagtaatcgc ggatcagcat gccgcggtga atacgttctc gggccttgta cacactgccc gtcacgccat gggagttggt ttt Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov. gltA gene - accession number: DQ269435 gcaagtatcg gtgaggatgt aatcgatata agtagggtat ctgcggaagc cgattgcttt acttccgacc cgggttttat gtctcctgct tcttgtcagt ctactatcac ctatatagac ggtgataaag gaaacttgcg gcatcgagga tatgatatta aagacttagc tgagaaatgt gattttttag aagtagctta tttactgatt tatggggaac taccaagtgg cgagcagtat aataatttca ctaaacaggt tgctcatcat tctttagtga atgaaagatt acactattta tttcaaacct tttgtagctc ttctcatcct gtggctatta tgcttgcggc tgtcggttct ctttcggcat tttatcctga tttattgaat tttaaggaag cagattacga acttaccgct attagaatga ttgctaagat acctaccatc gccgcaatgt cttataaata ttctatagga caaccgttta tttatcctga taattcgtta gattttaccg aaaattttct gcatatgatg tttgcaacgc cttgtacgaa atataaagta aatccaataa taaaaaatgc tcttaataag atatttatcc tacatgccga tcatgagcag aatgcttcta cttcaacagt ccgaattgct ggttcatccg gagctaaccc ttttgcttgt attagcacgg gtattgcctc actttggggg cctgctcacg gcggggctaa tgaagcggta ataaatatgc ttaaaaaaat tggtagttct gagtatattc ctaaatacat agctaaagct aaggataaaa atgatccatt taggttaatg ggttttggtc atcgtgtata taaaaactat gacccgcgtg ccgcagtact taaaaaaacg tgcaaagaag tattaaagga actcgggcag ctagacaaca atccgctctt acaaatagca atagaacttg aagctatcgc tcttaaagat gaatatttta ttgagagaaa attatatcca aatgttgatt tttattcggg tattatctat aaagctatgg gtataccgtc gcaaatgttc
197
actgtacttt ttgcaata Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov. ompA gene - accession number: DQ269437 tcttaaagcc gctttattca ccacctcaac cgcagcgata gtgctgagta gtagcggggc actcggtgtt gctgcaggtg ttatttctac taataatgca gcatttagtg atcttgctgt tgccaataat tggaatgaga taacggctga aggggtagct aatggtgctc ctgctgacgg tcctcaagac aattgggcat ttacttacgg tggtgatcat actatcactg cagataaagt cggtcgtatt attacggcta taaatgttgc gggtactact cccgtaggtc taaatattac tcaaaatacc gtcgttggtt cgattatgac gggaggtaac ttgttgcctg ttactattac tgccggcaaa agcttaactt taaatggtac taatgctgtt gctgcaaatc atggttttga tgctcctgcc gataattata caggtttagg aaatataact ttagggggag tgaatgctgc actaattata caatctgcaa ccccggcaaa gataacactt gcaggaaata tatatggag Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov. ompB gene - accession number: DQ269438 ccatagtagc cagttttgca ggttcagcta tgggtgctgc tatacagcag aatagaacaa caaacggagt tgctacaact gttgatggtg cgggatttga ccaaactgcc gccgttcctc ctgtaaatgt tgcggttgct ctaaatgcag ttattactgc taatgctaat aatggtatta atttaaatac tccagccggt agttttaacg gtttgttttt agatactgca aacaatttag cagtgacagt gagtgcagat actaccttag ggttcatcac taatgttgct aataaaggta acttctttga ccttacgctt gatgccggta aaactcttac tataacaggt caaggtatta ctaatgcaca agctgctgtt acaaaaaatg ctcaaaatgt tgttgcacaa tttaatggtg gtgctgctat tgccaataat gatcttagcg gtgtaggaag Rickettsia gravesii sp. nov. sca4 gene - accession number: DQ269438 agcaataagg aatatacaga agaacaagag caaaaagaat ttttatctca aactacaacc ccagaactag aagctgacga tggttttatc gttacttctg catcttctgc tcaatttacc ccttcaatta gtgctttatc ggacaatatc tctcctgaca gtcagatatc agacccaata accaaggctg taagggaaac aattatacaa ccgcaaaaag ataatttaat agaacaaata ttaaaaaacc tggcagtcct tacagaccgt gatttagctg aacaaaaaag aaaagaaata gaagaagaaa aagataaagc attaagtact tttttcggta atccggctaa tagagagttt attgataagg ctttagaaaa tcctgagctt aaaaagaaat tagaatcaat agaaatagcc ggctataaaa atattcataa tacatttagt gccgctagtg ggtaccctgg tggatttaaa ccggtacagt gggaaaatca agtaagtgca agcgatctta gagcaacagt agttaaaaat gatgcaggtg atgaactctg taccttaaat gaagcaactg ttaaaactaa gccttttact ttagctaaac aagacggtac tcaggttcag atcagctcat atagggaaat agattttcct ataaaacttg ataaagccga tggatcaatg catttatcga tggtagcatt aaaagctgat ggcacaaagc cctctaaaga taaagccgta tatttcactg tccactac Candidatus “Rickettsia antechini” gltA gene - accession number: DQ372954 gcaagtatcg gtgaggatgt aatcgatata agtagggtat ctgcggaagc tgattgcttt acttacgacc cgggttttat gtctactgct tcttgtcagt ctactatcac ctatatagac ggtgataaag gaatcttgcg gcatcgagga tatgatatta aagacttagc tgagaaaagt gattttttag aagtggcata tttactgatt tatggggaac taccaagtgg cgagcagtat aataatttca ctaaacaggt tgctcatcat tcattagtga atgaaagatt acactattta tttcaaacct tttgtagctc ttctcatcct atggctatta tgcttgcggc tgtcggttct ctttcggcat tttatcctga tttattgaat tttaaggaag cagattacga acttaccgct
198
attagaatga ttgctaagat acccaccatc gccgcaatgt cttataaata ttctatagga caaccgttta tttatcctga taattcgtta gattttaccg aaaattttct gcatatgatg tttgcaacgc cttgtacgaa atataaagta aatccaataa taaaaaatgc tcttaataag atatttatcc tacatgccga tcatgagcag aatgcttcta cttcaacagt ccgaattgcc ggctcatccg gagctaaccc ttttgcttgt attagcacgg gtattgcctc actttggggg cctgctcacg gcggggctaa tgaagcggta ataaatatgc ttaaagaaat cggtagttct gagtatattc ctaaatatat agctaaagct aaggataaaa atgatccatt taggttaatg ggttttggtc atcgtgtata taaaaactat gacccgcgtg ccgcagtact taaagaaacg tgcaaagaag tattaaagga actcgggcag ctagacaaca atccgctctt acaaatagca atagaacttg aagctatcgc tcttaaagat gaatatttta ttgagagaaa attatatcca aatgttgatt tttattcggg tattagctat aaagctatgg gtataccgtc gcaa Candidatus “Rickettsia antechini” ompA gene - accession number: DQ372955 tcttaaagcc gctttattca ctacctcaac cgcagcgata atgctgagta gtagcggggc actcggtgtt gctgcaggtg ttattgctac taataatgca gcatttagtg atcttgctgt tgccaataat tggaatgaga taacggctgg aggggtagct aatggtactc ctgctggcgg tcctcaaaac aatggggcat ttacttacgg tggtgatcat actatcactg cagatgcagt tgatcgtatt attacggcta taaatgttgc gggtactact cccgtaggtc taaatattgc tcaaaatacc gtcgttggtt cgattatgac gggaggtaac ttgttgcctg ttactattac tgccggcaaa agcttaactt taaacggtac taatgctgtt gctgcaaatc atggttttga tgctcctgtc gataattata caggtttagg aaatataact ttagggggag cgaatgctgc actaattata caatctgcaa ccccggcaaa gttaacactt gcaggaaata tagatggag Candidatus “Rickettsia antechini” ompB gene - accession number: DQ372956 ccatagtagc cagttttgca ggttcagcta tgggtgctgc tatacagcag aatagaacaa caaacggagc tgctacaact gttgatggtg cgggatttga ccaaattgcc gctcctgcaa atgttgcggt tgctctaaat gcagttatta ctgctaatgc taataatggt attaatttaa atactccagc cggtagtttt aacggtttgt ttttagatac tgcaaacaat ttagcagtga cagtgagtgc agatactacc ttagggttca tcactaatgc tgctaataac ggtaactcct ttaaccttac gcttggtgct ggtaaaactc ttactataac aggtcaaggt attactaatg cacaagctgc tgttacacac aatgctaaaa atgttgttgt acaatttaat ggtggtgctg ctattgccaa taatgatctt agcggtgtgg gaac Bartonella spp. strain Mu1 gltA gene – accession number: DQ372957 gaaaaaattc ctcaatttat tgcacgtgcg aaagataaag acgacccttt ccgccttatg ggttttggcc accggatata taaaaattat gatccgcgcg cgaaaattat gcaaaaaact tgccataaag ttttaaaaga attgaatatt aaagatgatc cactccttga tatcgctata aaacttgaaa atatagctct taatgacgaa tattttgttg aaaagaaact ttatcct
199
APPENDIX 6. MINIMUM EVOLUTION AND MAXIMUM PARSIMONY TREES.
Figure A4.1 Minimum evolution tree based on 16S rRNA sequences.
R. parkeri R. sibirica
R. conorii R. africae R. honei
R. slovaca R. rickettsii
R. japonica R. heilongjiangii
R. montanensis R. aeschlimannii
R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
Rickettsia sp.BWI-1 R. helvetica
R. felis R. prowazekii
R. typhi R. bellii
R. akari R. australis
100
93
0.2%
200
Figure A4.2 Maximum parsimony tree based on 16S rRNA sequences.
R. conorii R. sibirica R. africae R. parkeri R. honei R. rickettsii R. slovaca R. japonica R. heilongjiangii R. aeschlimannii Rickettsia sp.BWI-1 R. massiliae R. rhipicephali R. montanensis R. helvetica R. felis R. akari R. prowazekii R. typhi R. bellii R. australis
94
99
201
Figure A4.3. Minimum evolution tree based on gltA sequences.
R. sibirica R. parkeri
R. africae R. slovaca R. honei
R. rickettsii R. conorii
R. japonica R. heilongjiangii
R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 R. montanensis
R. helvetica R. felis R. akari
R. australis R. prowazekii R. typhi
R. bellii 100
99
98
92 81
94
99
100 76
72
2%
202
Figure A4.4. Maximum parsimony tree based on gltA sequences.
R. rickettsii R. conorii R. honei R. slovaca R. africae R. sibirica R. parkeri R. japonica R. heilongjiangii Rickettsia sp.BWI11
R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali R. montanensis R. helvetica R. felis R. akari R. australis R. prowazekii R. typhi R. bellii
97
96 70
86
100
99 96
83
203
Figure A4.5 Minimum evolution tree based on ompA sequences.
R. africae R. parkeri
R. sibirica R. conorii R. rickettsii
R. slovaca R. honei
R. japonica R. heilongjiangii
R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
Rickettsia sp. BWI-1
R. montanensis R. australis
93 100
100 84
97
98
2%
204
Figure A4.6 Maximum parsimony tree based on ompA sequences.
R. africae R. sibirica R. parkeri R. slovaca R. honei R. rickettsii R. conorii R. japonica
R. heilongjiangii Rickettsia sp. BWI-1
R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali R. montanensis R. australis
78 99
97
99
94
77
205
Figure A4.7 Minimum evolution tree based on ompB sequences.
R .africae R .parkeri
R. sibirica R. mongolotimonae
R. conorii R. slovaca R. rickettsii
R. honei R. japonica R. heilongjiangii
R. aeschlimannii Rickettsia sp. BWI-1
R. montanensis R. massiliae
R. rhipicephali R. akari
R. australis R. prowazekii
R. typhi 100
99
100
76
94 92
85 80
99
71
99
77
5%
206
Figure A4.8. Maximum parsimony tree based on ompB sequences.
R. africae R .parkeri R. sibirica R. mongolotimonae R. conorii R. slovaca R. rickettsii R. honei R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 R. montanensis R. japonica R. heilongjiangii R. akari R. australis R. prowazekii R. typhi
80 83
92
89
95
96
99
99
100
207
Figure A4.9. Minimum evolution tree based on sca4 sequences.
R. conorii R. parkeri R. sibirica R. africae
R. slovaca R. rickettsii R. honei R. japonica
R heilongjiangii R. montanensis R. aeschlimannii
R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
Rickettsia sp. BWI-1 R. felis
R. akari R. australis
R. prowazekii
R. typhi 100
100 100
83 91
100
98
5%
208
Figure A4.10. Maximum parsimony tree based on sca4 sequences.
R. conorii R. parkeri R. sibirica R. africae
R. honei R. rickettsii
R. slovaca R. japonica R. heilongjiangii R. montanensis R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali Rickettsia sp.BWI1 R. felis R. akari R. australis R. helvetica R. prowazekii R. typhi
100
83
71
99
74
100
90
100
209
Figure A4.11. Minimum evolution tree based on gltA sequences (Rickettsia sp. D-1).
R. sibirica R. parkeri
R. africae R. slovaca R. honei
R. rickettsii R. conorii
R. japonica R. heilongjiangii
R. gravesii Rickettsia sp. D-1
R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
R. montanensis R. helvetica
R. felis R. akari
R. australis R. prowazekii R. typhi
R. bellii 100
99 98
89
83
99
94
100 75
2%
210
Figure A4.12. Maximum parsimony tree based on gltA sequences.
R. rickettsii R. conorii R. honei R. sibirica R. parkeri R. slovaca R. africae R. japonica R. heilongjiangii R. gravesii Rickettsia sp. D-1 R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae
R. rhipicephali R. montanensis R. helvetica R. felis R. akari R. australis R. prowazekii R. typhi R. bellii
98
95 70
99
90
96
84
100
211
Figure A4.13. Minimum evolution tree based on ompA sequences.
R. africae R. parkeri
R. sibirica R. conorii R. rickettsii
R. honei R. slovaca
R. japonica R. heilongjiangii
Rickettsia sp. D-1 R. aeschlimannii
R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
R. gravesii R. montanensis
R. australis
94 99
100
85
91
94
99
2%
212
Figure A4.14. Maximum parsimony tree based on ompA sequences.
R. africae R. parkeri R. sibirica R. conorii R. rickettsii R. honei R. slovaca R. japonica R. heilongjiangii Rickettsia sp. D-1 R. aeschlimannii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali R. gravesii R. montanensis R. australis
99
98
93
76 99
90
85
213
Figure A4.15. Minimum evolution tree based on ompB sequences.
R. africae R. parkeri
R. sibirica R. mongolotimonae
R. conorii R. slovaca R. rickettsii
R. honei R. japonica R. heilongjiangii
R. aeschlimannii R. gravesii
Rickettsia sp. D-1 R. montanensis
R. massiliae R. rhipicephali
R. akari R. australis
R. prowazekii R. typhi 100
99
99
77
94
90 88
82 99
99
5%
214
Figure A4.16. Maximum parsimony tree based on ompB sequences.
R. africae R. parkeri R. sibirica R. mongolotimonae R. conorii R. slovaca R. rickettsii R. honei R. japonica R. heilongjiangii R. aeschlimannii R. gravesii R. massiliae R. rhipicephali Rickettsia sp. D-1 R. montanensis R. akari R. australis R. prowazekii R. typhi
97
80 83
92
90
96
99 99
100
215
Figure A.17. Minimum evolution tree based on gltA sequences (Bartonella sp. strain Mu1).
B. elizabethae
Strain C7rat
B. grahamii
StrainR1phy
Strain C4phy
Strain R2phy
B. taylorii
B. vinsonii
Strain C1phy
B. bacilliformis
B. doshiae
Strain40 Bartonella sp.strain Mu1
B. quintana
B. henselae
100
100
100
99
85
95
79
0.02
216
Figure A.18. Maximum-Parsimony Tree Based on gltA Sequences (Bartonella sp. strain Mu1).
B. elizabethae
Strain C7rat
B. grahamii
Strain R1phy
Strain C4rphy
Strain R2phy
Strain 40 Bartonella sp.strain Mu1
B. quintana
B. henselae
B. bacilliformis
B. doshiae
B. vinsonii
Strain C1phy
B. taylorii
98
100
79
99
95
217
APPENDIX 7. QUESTIONNAIRE
BARROW ISLAND HEALTH AND SAFETY QUESTIONNAIRE
PATIENT INFORMATION STATEMENT AND CONSENT FORM
Principal Investigators : A/Prof Stan Fenwick Epidemiology & Public Health School of Veterinary & Biomedical Sciences Murdoch University Dr John Dyer Infectious Diseases Physician SMAHS Infectious Diseases Service Fremantle Hospital Dr Angus Cook, Director, Ecology and Heath Research Group, School of Population Health, University of Western Australia
Contact Person : A/Prof Stan Fenwick Epidemiology & Public Health School of Veterinary & Biomedical Sciences Murdoch University Ph 08 9360 7418 You are invited to participate in the research study outlined below.
218
1. Background to Research Study Before you decide whether or not to take part in this research study, it is important that you understand why the study is being done, the procedures and assessments involved, and other important study information. Please read this information carefully and, if you have further questions, please ask the Principal Investigator. Rickettsias are a type of bacteria that are passed to humans by tick bite, and they may be an important unrecognised cause of infection in Western Australia. We plan to investigate whether this infection affects people working on Barrow Island, who are frequently exposed to ticks during their work or recreational activities. Any germs found as a result of these studies will be analysed to see if they are like other species known to cause human disease. 2. Purpose of the Study This study will find out if the bacteria (rickettsias) causing spotted fever are present in Western Australia. We want to discover if individuals engaged in activities in the bush, who have a high risk of tick contact, may have increased rates of infection from ticks. The ultimate goals of this research are:
• to identify the risk of transmission of this type of infection in Western Australia • to reduce the chance of individuals living, working or recreating in high-risk
areas getting infections • to develop health and safety guidelines for individuals at risk of infection
3. The Study Design An ethics committee has approved this study before any participant is allowed to enrol in the study. We are seeking a total of approximately 100-120 workers on Barrow Island. This study will involve:
(a) a blood test obtained at the beginning of the study period season to see if there has been any previous exposure to infection, and if this relates to contact with ticks;
(b) a second blood test 6 months later to see if any new cases of infection have occurred over this period of time. At the time of collection of the initial blood test, those who participate will be asked to fill out a questionnaire to measure previous level of contact with ticks. 4. Procedures If you decide to take part after reading this information sheet and discussing the trial with the study investigators, you will be asked to sign a form confirming that you agree to participate.
219
As part of this study you will have blood drawn (approximately 10mL or 1.5 tablespoons) at the time of enrolment, and another 10mL sample will be taken about 6 months later. This is a very important stage as it tells us about whether your body has been contact with these bacteria. At the time of your first visit you will be asked to fill in a questionnaire asking about your past level of risk for tick exposure. These documents will be collected by the study investigators and analysed to determine correlations between blood test results and intensity of tick exposure. The information you provide is confidential and will only be used for the purposes of this study. 5. Risks of Study Procedures Risks of Blood Drawing As part of this study, you will have your blood drawn (approximately 10mL) at each visit. Blood will be drawn by a health professional with extensive experience in blood taking. This procedure is uncomfortable but rarely results in any significant problems. Side effects that have been noted with drawing blood include feeling light-headed or faint, fainting, formation of a blood clot, bruising and/or infection at the site of the sampling. 6. Benefits of Participating in the Study We expect that this study, which has never been done before in WA, will benefit people involved in a number of jobs that involve a high level of contact with the natural environment. For the first time, we will understand if there are risks of this important type of infection in WA and will be able to make suggestions for reducing the chance of getting infected. 7. Study expenses There are no financial costs to you by your involvement.
8. Financial Support for the Study Financial support to cover the costs of this study is being provided by Chevron
and Fremantle Hospital. These funds are placed in a nominated account of
the Hospital and the expenditure of the funds is in accordance with the
approval given by the Human Research Ethics Committee.
9. Questions about the study
220
The Principal Investigator will do all that is possible to answer your questions and concerns as they arise.
10. Statement of Subject Rights Your participation in this study is entirely voluntary. This means that if you decide not to take part or to withdraw from the study at any time, you will not be penalised nor lose any benefits to which you are otherwise entitled.
The research team will have explained the details of this trial to you and answered any questions you may have. You should be satisfied with the information you have been given and had adequate time to consider whether you want to participate. If you decide you would like to take part in this study, you will be asked to sign a consent form. If you do not want to take part, or if you choose to withdraw from the trial at any time, you will continue to receive the best medical care offered by your doctor. You do not have to give a reason if you withdraw. All information obtained in connection with this st udy will remain confidential. You will never be identified in any publication or public presentation of data from this study. Only authorised personnel at Fremantle Hospital and the School of Population Health, University of Western Australia will have access to the study documents and results. This information is kept in a locked, password protected facility. By signing this form, you give permission that these authorised persons may have access to study documents if necessary. Your employer has NO access to this personal inform ation at any time and cannot ever request it. If new information becomes available during the course of the study that is relevant to your willingness to continue taking part in the study you will be informed promptly. If you would like more information about the study, do not hesitate to ask Dr Stan Fenwick: Contact No: 08 9360 7418 If you have a problem during the study and would like to talk to an independent person you may contact: Murdoch University Human Ethics Committee Representative Contact No: 08 9360 2393. You will be given a copy of this form to keep.
221
1.1.1 CONSENT FORM
1. I, ..................................................................... of ...............................................
......................................................................., aged ......................... years,
agree to participate in the experiment described in the patient information
statement set out in the attached form.
2. I acknowledge that I have read the patient information statement, which
explains why I have been selected, the aims of the experiment and the nature and the possible risks of the investigation, and the statement has been explained to me to my satisfaction.
3. Before signing this consent form, I have been given the opportunity of asking
any questions relating to any possible physical and mental harm I might suffer as a result of my participation and I have received satisfactory answers.
4. I understand that I can withdraw from the experiment at any time without
prejudice to my relationship with my doctor. 5. I agree that research data gathered from the results of the study may be
published, provided that I cannot be identified. 6. I understand that if I have any questions relating to my participation in this
research, I may contact Dr Stan Fenwick at Murdoch University on 08 9360 7418, who will be happy to answer them.
7. I acknowledge receipt of a copy of this Consent Form and the Subject Information Statement.
Complaints may be directed to Chair of Murdoch University Human Research Ethics Committee on 08 9360 2393
__________________________ __________________________ _______ Signature of Participant Please PRINT name Date ___________________________ __________________________ _______ Signature of Investigator(s) Please PRINT name Date __________________________ _________________________ _______ Signature of Witness Please PRINT name Date __________________________ Nature of Witness
222
1.1.2 CONSENT FORM
1.1.3 REVOCATION OF CONSENT
I hereby wish to WITHDRAW my consent to participate in the research proposal described above and understand that such withdrawal WILL NOT jeopardise any treatment or my relationship with my doctor. ___________________________ _______________________ Signature Date ___________________________ Please PRINT Name __________________________ Signature of Investigator(s) __________________________ ______________________ Please PRINT name Date __________________________ Signature of Witness __________________________ ______________________ Please PRINT name Date __________________________ Nature of Witness
223
Identification code: |_|_|_|_|_|
BBAARRRROOWW IISSLLAANNDD HHEEAALLTTHH AANNDD SSAAFFEETTYY
QQUUEESSTTIIOONNNNAAIIRREE
Thank you for your interest and co-operation in our research. We are a group of doctors and veterinarians from Murdoch University, Fremantle Hospital, and the School of Population Health at the University of Western Australia and are looking at whether contact with ticks affects human health. We have a particular interest in a range of diseases which ticks can carry and transmit to people, such as Q fever, Flinders Island spotted fever and Queensland tick typhus in other parts of Australia. It is not known whether any of these problems exist on Barrow Island. The information you give us is vital to understanding whether such diseases affect humans and what activities may affect a person’s chances of catching them. The research you are involved in has never been done before in Western Australia.
224
GENERAL QUESTIONS
1. Date today: / / 2006 2. Gender: � Male � Female
3. Year of birth: |_|_|_|_|
4. What is your current job/role on Barrow Island:
…………………………………..
5. What are the main work tasks you do in this job?
……………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………..……………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………….…………………………..
6. How long have you worked on Barrow Island? |_|_| Months |_|_| Years
7. Approximately how many times a year do you go to the island?
|_|_| Times
8. Approximately how long do you spend on the Island each time you work there?
|_|_|_| Days OR |_|_|Weeks OR |_|_| Months
225
RECORD OF PAST AND CURRENT ACTIVITIES ON BARROW ISLAND
9. While you are on Barrow Island, how often do you go into the bush or scrub for work ? (please tick the answer that most applies to you)
� Very frequently (5 or more days a week) � Frequently (1-4 days a week) � Often (1-3 times a month) � Occasionally (Less than once a month) � I spend NO time in the bush for work
10. While you are on Barrow Island, how often do you go into the bush or scrub on Barrow Island for recreation (eg bush walking) ?
(please tick the answer that most applies to you)
� Very frequently (5 or more days a week) � Frequently (1-4 days a week) � Often (1-3 times a month) � Occasionally (Less than once a month) � I spend NO time in the bush for recreation
����If you answered “ I spend NO time in the bush” to question 9 AND 10, please go straight to QUESTION 17 . Otherwise, please proceed to QUESTION 11.
11. How long do you spend in the bush on an average day?
� No time � Less than 1 hour � 1 to 3 hours � Greater than 3 hours
12. Is time you spend in the bush on Barrow Island:
� Mainly for work reasons � Mainly recreational reasons � Equally related to work and recreation
13. How often do you wear short-sleeved shirts and/or shorts during recreational time spent in bush or scrub on Barrow Island?
� Every time I go out for recreational reasons � Often (50% or more of the time I go out for recreational reasons) � Sometimes (less than 50% of the time I go out for recreational reasons) � Never
226
14. How often do you see animals (such as marsupials) or evidence that they have been there?
� Every time I go out � if so, What animals?
………………………………….. � Often (50% or more of the time I go out) � if so, What animals?
………………………………….. � Sometimes (less than 50% of the time I go out ) � if so, What animals?
………………………………….. � Never
15. How often do you find ticks on yourself after time spent in the bush on Barrow Island?
� Every time I go out � Often (50% or more of the time I go out) � Sometimes (less than 50% of the time I go out) � Never
16. How often do you apply tick repellent before spending time in the bush or scrub?
� Every time I go out � Often (50% or more of the time I go out) � Sometimes (less than 50% of the time I go out ) � Never
227
17. In the past 2 years, how often have you been bushwalking, hiking, camping or working in the bush or forest in other parts of Australia or overseas ? This does NOT include your time on Barrow Island.
Bushwalking, hiking, camping or working
in the bush or forest in other parts of Western Australia (except for Barrow
Island) or interstate
(please tick the answer that most applies to you)
Bushwalking, hiking, camping or working in the bush or forest overseas (outside
Australia)
(please tick the answer
that most applies to you)
� Not at all in past 2 years
� Not at all in past 2 years
� Less than once a year � Which state(s)/territories?…………
� Less than once a year
� Which country/countries?…………
� About once a year � Which state(s)/territories?…………
� About once a year
� Which country/countries?…………
� More than once a year � Which state(s)/territories?…………
� More than once a year
� Which country/countries?…………
228
RECORD OF TICK BITES 18. IN THE PAST 2 YEARS, how often have you been bitten by ticks? This refers to tick bites that may have occurred while on Barrow Island, or while in some other location in Australia or overseas.
� Most or every time I am in the bush (more than 75% of the time) � Often when I am in the bush (25-75% of the time) � Occasionally when I am in the bush (Less than 25% of the time) � Never (Go to Q19) � Not sure (Go to Q19)
���� If the subject answered “ Never I spend no time in the bush part from rogaining” or “Not sure” to question 18, please go straight to question 19. Otherwise, please proceed.
a. In which months do the bites usually occur? (e.g. Mar-May) ……. b. In what locations have you been training when you were bitten by ticks IN THE PAST 2 YEARS? (TICK ALL THAT APPLY)
� on Barrow lsland � elsewhere in Australia or overseas
Location (eg name of area, park or district): ……………. State: ……………. Country: …………….
c. In which part(s) of your body do the bite(s) usually occur? (TICK ALL THAT APPLY)
� on chest, back or abdomen (stomach region) � hands, arms or shoulders � feet or legs � on neck, face or scalp � on groin or buttocks
d. Have you experienced any of the following after tick bites IN THE PAST 2 YEARS?
Nature of reaction Please tick any symptoms that you have had
Immediate (up to a couple of days after tick bites)
- Local swelling of the skin around the bite
� Most or e very time I get bitten (more than 75% of the time) � Often when I get bitten (25-75% of the time) � Occasionally when I get bitten (Less than 25% of the time) � Never � Not sure
- Tenderness of the skin around the bite � Most or e very time I get bitten (more than 75% of the time)
� Often when I get bitten (25-75% of the time) � Occasionally when I get bitten (Less than 25% of the time) � Never � Not sure
- Discharge, pus or fluid coming out of the skin around the bite
� Most or e very time I get bitten (more than 75% of the time) � Often when I get bitten (25-75% of the time) � Occasionally when I get bitten (Less than 25% of the time) � Never � Not sure
229
- Itchiness around the bite � Most or e very time I get bitten (more than 75% of the time) � Often when I get bitten (25-75% of the time) � Occasionally when I get bitten (Less than 25% of the time) � Never � Not sure
At any time in the 2 weeks after tick bites
- Prolonged headache (> 3 days)* � When did this occur? (e.g. Feb 2005)
……/……….
- Fever or chills* � When did this occur? (e.g. Feb 2005)
……/……….
- Rash* TICK ALL THAT APPLY
� around the bite � on chest, back or abdomen (stomach region) � hands, arms or shoulders � feet or legs � on neck, face or scalp � on groin or buttocks
� When did this occur? (e.g. Feb 2005) ……/……….
� - Tender or painful ‘glands’ (lumps or nodes under the skin, usually away from the bite mark)*
TICK ALL THAT APPLY � in the groin � in the armpits � in the neck � other; where_____________
� When did this occur? (e.g. Feb 2005) ……/……….
- Aching in joints, limbs, back or neck without reason*
� When did this occur? (e.g. Feb 2005) ……/……….
- Tiredness/ Feeling ‘out of energy’ without reason*
� When did this occur? (e.g. Feb 2005) ……/……….
- Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing without reason*
� When did this occur? (e.g. Feb 2005) ……/……….
- Blistering/scabbing around skin area where bitten*
� When did this occur? (e.g. Feb 2005) ……/……….
����If the subject answered “At any time in the 2 weeks after the tick bite” to ANY OF THE SYMPTOMS, please continue. Otherwise, pl ease go straight to question 13. I would like to ask you about the [*symptoms/symptoms] which occurred in ……/………. (START WITH THE EARLIEST DATE). Thinking back to th e
230
tick bites that occurred in the two weeks before th ese symptoms:
e. Where were you when you were bitten?
� on Barrow lsland � elsewhere in Australia or overseas
Location (eg name of area, park or district): ……………. State: ……………. Country: …………….
f. In which part(s) of your body did the bite(s) occur? (TICK ALL THAT APPLY)
� on chest, back or abdomen (stomach region) � hands, arms or shoulders � feet or legs � on neck, face or scalp � on groin or buttocks
g. Did you remove the tick(s) yourself?
� Yes � No: removed at a medical clinic � No : removed by someone else: who?.........
h. Did you seek medical advice for the tick bite(s)?
� Yes � No � Not sure
i. Were you treated with antibiotics after the tick bite(s)? � Yes
� No � Not sure j. Did you miss any work because of the tick bite(s)?
� Yes � if yes, How many days in total? . . . . . . . . . . � No
����NOW PROCEED TO THE NEXT DATE ON THE TABLE ABOVE: I would now like to ask you about the [*symptoms/symptoms] which occurred in ……/………. Thinking back to the tick bites that occurred in th e two weeks before these symptoms:
e. Where were you when you were bitten? � on Barrow lsland � elsewhere in Australia or overseas
Location (eg name of area, park or district): ……………. State: ……………. Country: …………….
f. In which part(s) of your body did the bite(s) occur? (TICK ALL THAT APPLY)
� on chest, back or abdomen (stomach region) � hands, arms or shoulders � feet or legs � on neck, face or scalp � on groin or buttocks
g. Did you remove the tick(s) yourself?
� Yes
231
� No: removed at a medical clinic � No : removed by someone else: who?.........
h. Did you seek medical advice for the tick bite(s)?
� Yes � No � Not sure
i. Were you treated with antibiotics after the tick bite(s)? � Yes
� No � Not sure j. Did you miss any work because of the tick bite(s)?
� Yes � if yes, How many days in total? . . . . . . . . . . � No
232
����NOW PROCEED TO THE NEXT DATE ON THE TABLE ABOVE: I would now like to ask you about the [*symptoms/symptoms] which occurred in ……/………. Thinking back to the tick bites that occurred in th e two weeks before these symptoms:
e. Where were you when you were bitten? � on Barrow lsland
� elsewhere in Australia or overseas Location (eg name of area, park or district): ……………. State: ……………. Country: ……………. f. In which part(s) of your body did the bite(s) occur? (TICK ALL THAT APPLY)
� on chest, back or abdomen (stomach region) � hands, arms or shoulders � feet or legs � on neck, face or scalp � on groin or buttocks
g. Did you remove the tick(s) yourself?
� Yes � No: removed at a medical clinic � No : removed by someone else: who?.........
h. Did you seek medical advice for the tick bite(s)?
� Yes � No � Not sure
i. Were you treated with antibiotics after the tick bite(s)? � Yes
� No � Not sure
j. Did you miss any work because of the tick bite(s)? � Yes � if yes, How many days in total? . . . . . . . . . . � No
233
19. APART FROM ANY SYMPTOMS YOU HAVE MENTIONED ALREADY, have you EVER experienced any of the following since you started working on Barrow Island?
(Please tick all the symptoms you have had and answer the questions in that row. If you haven’t had any of the following symptoms th en please go straight to question 20 )
Nature of reaction
Please tick any
symptoms that you have had
How many times have these
symptoms occurred since you started
working on Barrow?
What time of the year did these
symptoms occur? (eg:
February)
Do you remember being bitten by a tick anytime in the 2 weeks before these symptoms developed?
Skin swelling/ tenderness
� Yes�� � No � Not sure
if YES:
|_|_|_|
� Yes � No � Can’t remember
Prolonged headache (> 3 days)
� Yes�� � No � Not sure
if YES:
|_|_|_|
� Yes � No � Can’t remember
Rash over parts or all of my body
� Yes�� � No � Not sure
if YES:
|_|_|_| TICK ALL THAT APPLY � around the bite � on chest, back or abdomen (stomach region) � hands, arms or shoulders � feet or legs � on neck, face or scalp � on groin or buttocks
� Yes � No � Can’t remember
General aching in joints, limbs, back or neck without reason
� Yes�� � No � Not sure
if YES:
|_|_|_|
� Yes � No � Can’t remember
Prolonged tiredness/ Feeling ‘out of energy’ (> 3 days) without reason
� Yes�� � No � Not sure
if YES:
|_|_|_|
� Yes � No � Can’t remember
Fever or chills � Yes��
� No � Not sure
if YES:
|_|_|_|
� Yes � No � Can’t remember
Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing without reason
� Yes�� � No � Not sure
if YES:
|_|_|_|
� Yes � No � Can’t remember
234
OTHER MEDICAL HISTORY
20. Do you have any major medical conditions?
� Yes � No
�If YES: Please describe ……………………………….……………………
……………………………………………………
21. Are you routinely on any medications or treatments?
� Yes � No
�If YES: a. What is the name of the medication?
……………………………….…………………… ……………………………………………………
b. What condition or health problem do you take this for?
……………………………….…………………… ……………………………………………………
Thank you for taking the time to complete this surv ey.
235
APPENDIX 8. RESULTS OF THE SEROSURVEY
Table A3. Titration results for the serology performed on respondents to the Barrow Island questionnaire. Respondant No.
austral honei conorii sibir rickett akari typhi prow
1 512 512 256 256 128 128 256 256 2 512 512 256 256 128 128 256 256 3 256 256 256 256 256 256 256 256 4 256 128 128 256 128 128 128 128 5 256 512 256 256 128 128 256 256 6 256 256 256 512 256 256 256 256 7 256 256 256 256 256 256 256 256 8 128 1024 128 256 256 128 256 256 9 512 256 256 256 256 256 512 512 10 256 256 256 256 256 128 256 256 11 512 256 256 256 256 512 512 512 12 256 512 256 256 256 256 256 256 13 256 256 256 256 256 256 512 512 14 256 512 256 256 256 128 256 256 15 256 256 256 256 128 256 256 256 16 256 256 256 512 256 256 512 512 17 256 1024 256 512 256 128 256 256 18 256 512 128 512 256 256 512 512 19 256 512 512 256 512 256 256 256 20 256 256 512 256 256 256 256 256 21 256 256 512 256 256 256 256 256 22 256 256 256 256 256 256 128 128 23 - - - - - - - - 24 - - - - - - - - 25 - - - - - - - - 26 - - - - - - - - 27 256 128 128 128 256 128 256 256 28 512 256 256 256 256 256 256 256 29 256 256 256 256 512 128 256 256 30 128 256 256 128 256 256 256 256 31 256 256 128 128 256 256 256 256 32 256 256 256 128 128 - 256 256 33 256 256 256 128 256 256 256 256 34 512 256 512 256 256 256 512 512 35 128 128 128 128 256 128 128 128 36 - - - - - - - - 37 256 256 256 128 256 128 256 256 38 256 128 128 256 256 128 256 256 39 - - - - - - - -
Titration results
236
40 128 128 256 128 256 256 256 256 41 256 128 512 128 128 128 256 256 42 256 128 256 128 256 128 256 256 43 256 128 256 128 128 128 256 256 44 - - - - - - - - 45 128 256 256 256 128 256 256 256 46 128 256 256 256 128 256 256 256 47 256 256 256 256 256 128 256 256 48 - - - - - - - - 49 128 256 128 129 256 128 256 256 50 256 128 128 128 512 256 128 128 51 256 512 256 256 256 256 128 128 52 256 256 256 128 256 128 256 256 53 - - - - - - - - 54 256 128 256 256 256 256 256 256 55 - - - - - - - - 56 512 128 256 128 128 128 128 128 57 256 256 256 256 256 128 256 256 58 256 256 256 256 256 256 256 256 59 128 128 128 128 256 128 128 128
austral – R. australis; sibir – R. sibirica; rickett – R. rickettsii; prow – R. prowazekii. - no antibody titre.
237