Detailed Project Report - Rajasthanwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...6.5 Entry...
Transcript of Detailed Project Report - Rajasthanwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed...6.5 Entry...
Detailed Project Report Integrated Watershed Management Programme
[IWMP-II, Jahazpur, District: Bhilwara, Raj.]
Project Implementation Agency: Foundation for Ecological Security
Period of Project: 2009-2016
Total Area: 7191 Ha & Total Budget: 862.92 lacs
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
2
Table of Contents 1. Project at a Glance
2. Watershed Map
3. Introduction
4. Conceptual Buildup: Strengthening Watershed Development Work
5. Project Purpose, Objectives and Outcomes
6. Area Details 4.1 Geographical Profile
4.2. Geological Profile
4.3. Ecological Profile
4.4. Land Use Profile
4.5. Edaphic Profile
4.6. Socio-demographic Profile
4.7. Livelihood Profile
7. Elements of Work
8.1 Ecologically sound regeneration
8.2 Institutional mechanism
8.3 Building dialogue and discussion
8. Components of Work
6.1 Capacity building and community mobilization
6.2 Work on landscape components
6.2.1 Work on arable land
6.2.2 Work on non arable land
6.2.3 Drainage line treatment
6.3 Livelihood promotion activities
6.4 Energy conservation
6.5 Entry Point Activities
9. Technical Plan
10. Budget
11. Annexure
12. Glossary
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
3
Project at a Glance 1. Name of watershed : Integrated Watershed Management Programme
2. Total watershed area : 7191 ha
3. Macro watershed number : 1 and 3
4. Micro-watershed number : Macro: 1 [Micro 1]
Macro: 3 [Micro 4,5,6 & 8]
5. Gram Panchayat : Baori, Teetori, Gandher, Phalasiya & Pandher
6. Villages in watershed area : Baori, Taswariya, Teetori, Gulabpura,
Bheelri, Dhagariya, Gandher, Bheempura,
Maganpura, Teetora- Mafi, Indokia,
Sihana, Jaswantpura, Gokulpura & Pandher
7. Panchayat Samiti : Jahazpur
8. Tehsil : Jahazpur
9. Name of project : Integrated Watershed Management
Program
10. Budget : 8.63 crore
Sl. No. Details
1 Name of project [as per GOI] IWMP –II
2 Year of Sanction Vide letter F.18(199) WSD & SWC/PFC/2009/1822-2104
dated 11.11.2009. Issue of Sanction 9th March 2010. MOU
signed between DWDU & FES on 31st May 2010
3 No. of gram panchayat &
revenue villages
5 & 15 respectively
4 Elevation Highest 360 & lowest 337 MSL.
5 Slope (%) 6-8
6 Type of project Other
7 River Catchment Banas
8 Treatable area 7191 ha @ Rs 12000/ ha cost
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
4
1. Introduction:
The Government of Rajasthan and Foundation for Ecological Security has signed an
agreement in April 2010 for implementation of the “IWMP” watershed in Jahazpur
Tehsil of Bhilwara district. It has been proposed to develop 7191 ha through
budgetary support from Government of India and Government of Rajasthan under
Integrated Watershed Management Programme [IWMP-II]. Acknowledging the
potential of watershed development, the project aims to promote sustainable
livelihoods through strengthening the ecological and institutional foundation in the
area.
The project will guide an intervention which is anchored on people’s engagement at
various levels and is based on the specific characteristics of the socio-economic-
ecological settings, to foster a healthy relationship between livelihoods and natural
surroundings and offer stable economic opportunities. In translating this to action, it
is essential to realistically assess the potential of the farming system, common and
private resources, and soil, water, biodiversity and nutrient capacity. The scope of the
desired intervention is in terms of bringing equilibrium between supply and demand
both quantitatively and qualitatively, so as to develop a balance between
appropriation and production needs. Realistic assessment and movement towards a
balanced land use and livelihood strategies would significantly depend on the
strength and character of the institutions of collective management and regulation.
FES as the Project Implementing Agency (PIA) would make efforts towards engaging
with different stakeholders in initiating and strengthening systems of collective
management over land and water. Village level institutions would be strengthened to
put in place good governance for development and equitable appropriation of
commons. Capacities of the Watershed Development Committees, User Groups and
Self Help Groups would be enabled for the post-project operation and maintenance
and further development of the assets created during the project period. Adoption of
low cost and indigenous technology would be promoted. Convergence of additional
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
5
financial resources from other government programmes such as MGNREGA,
National Horticulture Mission, Rashtriya krishi Vikas Yojana, Tribal Welfare Schemes,
Artificial Groundwater Recharging, and Green India Mission would be facilitated.
The project thus, provides a unique opportunity to work on issues of ecological
security and improvement in the well being of the different sections of the society and
will guide the planning, implementation and the capacity building aspects. Keeping
in view the watershed-based development approach, a detailed project report has
been prepared to guide the implementation process. During the preparation of the
report detailed discussions and negotiations with the community and the village level
institutions were conducted to analyze the need reflected by the individual household
level survey, primary data and secondary sources of data. Sequential capacity
building programmes were organised with PRI representatives, community members
and Watershed committee aimed at enabling capacities to understand information’s
and assist in the planning process of the DPR preparation.
During the process of planning the entry point activities [EPA] had become the
epicenter of the village level discussions, and the community members who were
monitoring the EPA activities were capacitated to prepare the village level activity
plan & budget on the basis of the local need and also the monitoring management
plan for effective & efficient implementation. The area being effected by acute floride
so the community response to roof rain water harvesting in the schools was
overwhelming supported.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
6
2. Conceptual Build-up: Strengthening Watershed Development
Approach
Rural poverty is mostly associated with recurrent occurrences of drought, poor
maintenance and degradation of natural resources. Degradation of land and water
resources particularly in the semi arid areas has led to adverse economic and
ecological consequences in contemporary rural society, where survival, sustenance
and growth are intimately linked to the health and productivity of the surrounding
natural resources. In the recent past, several interventions were made to reduce
poverty through drought-proof technologies. Transition in climate and degradation of
Natural Resources is one of the reasons for the increasing popularity of the Watershed
Development approach. Watershed Development has huge prospects in transforming
rural lives and looks into a holistic process of:
Introducing new knowledge and technology.
Appreciating, maintaining and adapting traditional knowledge.
Building effective exchange systems through a diverse set of institutional
arrangements.
Building and strengthening specific, responsive, accountable and adaptive
systems.
Although in general ‘guidelines’ and conceptual documents incorporate these
elements, specific focus on only one or two components have led to limited success in
fulfilling the major objectives of watershed development programmes. In this respect
specific attention needs to be given to further strengthen watershed development
approach. Some of the key issues highlighted for this are:
a) Addressing comprehensively the micro-drivers of change:
Watershed development projects have huge potential to address the micro-drivers
effectively. However the degree to which the various
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
7
drivers in the three major components of social-economic-ecological aspects are
comprehensively addressed in watershed development projects leaves much to be
desired. The degree to which these drivers are properly understood and incorporated
in watershed management plans will directly influence how much the project is able
to influence the various aspects of livelihood strategies.
Another important aspect is comprehensively looking both the supply side
enhancement measures and the demand side management measures in watershed
development programs. Focusing only on the supply side enhancement measures has
been unable to ensure sustainable and judicious use of the resources created. Demand
management through better socio-institutional capability, technological adoption etc.,
would need to be properly incorporated in the project design to impart sustainability
to resource management practices.
b) Watershed development and adaptive management
Watershed management has several characteristics which include:
Multiple stakeholders with multiple interests.
Complex ecological systems with a variety of land use.
High level of uncertainty and many unknown factors.
Watershed Development
Projects
Drivers of change: Soil and nutrient
properties Biomass availability Water availability Land use Social and institutional
capability Technological adoption Patterns of demand and
supply Natural resource usage
Economic status Energy availability
Influencing livelihood strategies
Agriculture Livestock Production of other
materials Labour and
migration Biomass Energy Landscape and
environmental management
Agro-ecosystem function
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
8
This makes watershed management a complex process requiring a learning
approach based on a process of experimental decision-making and monitoring.
Adaptive management has been developed to address these characteristics and ‘is
an approach for managing the complex systems based on incremental,
experiential learning and decision making, supported by active ongoing
monitoring and feedback from the effects of outcomes of decisions’. It involves the
process of building social capital among stakeholders for collaboration and
learning, and knowledge sharing among group members.
c) Watershed development with an Integrated Landscape Restoration Program
Watershed projects should be seen as means to put in sustainable land-use
planning. Landscape Restoration Approach (LRA) is a process that aims to regain
ecological integrity and enhance human well being in degraded landscapes. Key
aspects of LRA are that it focuses on:
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
9
Restoration decision on how best to restore functionality, that is, the goods,
services and processes that the different components of landscape delivers.
It recognizes that both the solutions to neither the complex land use problems
nor the outcomes of a particular course of action can be predicted accurately,
especially as ecosystems and land-use patterns change over time.
It recognizes the need for multi-solution approach to provide the practitioners
with sufficient flexibility to address the complex issues.
Landscape constitutes of different components and the pattern in which these
components are distributed makes each landscape a unique one. Based on the
location specificities landscape can be classified as agricultural landscape, pasture
landscape, forest landscape, or even more. In improving watershed management
approach the value of this framework is not only in clearly envisioning specific
restoration plans for each components but also in establishing the links with
different landscape component and its contribution for specific landscape
restoration.
d) Addressing groundwater in watershed development projects
In context of Rajasthan more than 80% of water requirement are met from
groundwater sources. However in most of the watershed development programs
interaction with this important aspect leaves much to be desired. Groundwater
exploitation problems can be classified under two broad problems:
I. Aquifer Overexploitation (Overdevelopment): Aquifer overexploitation or
overdevelopment is prolonged process of groundwater withdrawal from an
aquifer leading to persistent falls in groundwater level as the rate of
withdrawal is more than the average annual replenishment rate.
II. Groundwater mining: Groundwater mining can be used for those
situations of groundwater use where aquifer is having a predominantly
non-renewable resources and the reduction in aquifer reserves is essentially
permanent.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
10
In both these situations an adaptive approach to management has to be adopted,
recognizing the risks and uncertainties at the outset to reduce subsequent conflicts.
Unplanned depletion of groundwater reserves can undermine, and potentially
erode, the economic and social vitality of the traditional groundwater-dependent
community and instances of the collapse of such rural communities are known.
Hence, there is need to plan the exploitation of groundwater resources, and guide
their utilization with a view to making communities better socio-economically
prepared for coping with increasing water stress due to depleting aquifer storage.
Groundwater management can be widely classified as:
i. Unplanned exploitation and depletion
ii. Planned exploitation and depletion.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
11
iii. Planned exploitation and recovery.
In
Rajasthan, a mix of ‘ii’ and ‘iii’ strategies is required to cope with the looming crisis. In
areas where the geological settings are such that low recharge rates are prevalent
‘planned exploitation and depletion’ needs to be put up in consultation with all the
stakeholders. In such scenarios based on the supply side characteristics ‘planned
recovery’ can also be put up. In regions where geological setting promote recharge
regulated use with supply side enhancement measures can help in not only reducing
the trajectory of the fall of groundwater in given time frame but also will be able to
ensure that the system recovers after depletion to an optimum state.
e. Developing a comprehensive governance agenda
Conservation, protection and judicious use of resources depend on establishing strong
governance function at the community level. Crafting and strengthening strong
community institutions is the first critical aspect of this process. These institutions at
the first level ensure the sustainability of site level restoration actions, which with the
capacity building and enthused collective actions can also translate in governance
function on other components of landscape. Simultaneously, there is also a need to
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
12
strengthen institutions which can take up governance agenda to a higher scale from
these ‘micro level’ institutions.
The 73rd amendment to the Constitution of India has entrusted the Panchayats with
29 functions enabling them to be effective governance institutions. Therefore
capacitating the Panchayats to be resource/knowledge centers in terms of not only
developing them as institutions which have adequate knowledge of the resources
they inhabit, but also centers of planning and regulatory bodies in close association
with micro-level institutions can set in strong sustainability to community based
natural resource management plan. The proposed second layer of institutional
structure therefore can also be associations of Panchayats and micro-level institutions
governing an area which they associate themselves with in social-economical-
ecological terms. Also keeping in the complexity of such process, there is a need for
these institutions to involve experts, different government departments, other
agencies and local leaders in setting up an effective governance structure.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
13
3. Project Purpose, Objectives and Outcomes:
The broad purposes of the project are:
a. Strengthen the capacity of village institutions and Panchayats to implement
and support watershed development plan.
b. Restore functionality of different landscape components comprehensive
approach to conservation to deliver intended goods and services.
c. Restore ecological integrity by increasing flow of nutrients, water and biomass
across the landscape with improved biodiversity and stabilized production
systems.
d. Increase household incomes through strengthening current livelihood
strategies, introducing new ones and diversifying sources of income.
In this context, the objective of the project would be:
To assist village communities in obtaining tenure on public land or usufructs
and initiating strengthening systems of collective management and governance
over land and water, in a contiguous area to draw on the advantages of its
ecological and social structure.
To increase the availability of biomass through revegetation of the marginal
lands and increased availability of surface and ground water through soil and
moisture conservation and retention measures.
To assist communities in effectively integrating animal husbandry, agriculture
and natural resources management and in regulating the demand for biomass
and water through rules, regulations and mechanisms evolved by community
institutions at village and inter village levels
Landscape planning and management brings the conservation fully into the
rural development discourse by highlighting the importance of ecosystem
services in supporting continued agricultural production. It emphasizes both
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
14
the need and the opportunity to foster synergies among conservation,
agricultural production, livestock production and rural livelihoods.
To strengthen the village level and meso-level governance of biomass and
water resources by village communities, including involvement of Panchayats
in addressing natural resource management along with other initiatives of the
Government, Multilateral agencies.
To promote partnerships between the village communities, academia, civil
society and district administration that collectively envision, develop and
implement land use plans for the conservation and judicious use of natural
resources.
To promote convergence by implementing watershed works in private land
through different ongoing development schemes.
Implementation of the project for seven years would result in the following
outcome:
Strong collective management by village institutions over their landscape, with
appropriate tenure arrangements, in contiguous areas in each location. As the
setting and level of discussion in each of the institutions would vary, processes
on appropriation and production would be at different levels of maturity and
intensity. However, processes on integration of various components of the
ecosystem, an assessment of their status and a proactive course of action would
be evolved by the communities within and across habitations.
Improved biomass and biodiversity of common lands and increased
availability of surface as well as recharge of ground water.
Effective integration of animal husbandry, agriculture and natural resources
management and the demand for biomass and water regulated through rules,
regulations and mechanisms evolved by communities at village and inter
village levels.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
15
Village level and meso-level governance of biomass and water resources by
village communities, strengthened along with the involvement of Panchayats,
government, civil society, other agencies etc.
Landscape planning and management engaging different actors (scientific
experts, professionals and village communities) in an informed, iterative and
participatory planning process. This planning process through understanding
alternative future scenarios helps to encourage informed discussions of
alternatives. The discussion leads to a landscape plan that is adaptive in terms
of implementation, monitoring and learning.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
16
4. Area Details:
4.1 Geographical Profile: Jahazpur is situated between 7502’50”E to 75027’ 42” E and 25021’6” N to 25046’23” N.
Located in the north east of Bhilwara district, the Tehsil shares its boundary with
Ajmer district in the north and Shahpura, Kotri and Mandalgarh tehsils of District
Bhilwara on the other sides. It has an average elevation of 334 mts from mean sea
level. The average annual temperature ranges between 28-32C and rainfall ranges
between 280-630 mm. Spanning over an area of 7191 ha, the project area encompasses
fourteen villages in five of the Panchayats of the Tehsil. The topography is both
undulating as well as plain. The district is a part of the Banas (9157.2 sq km), Chambal
(1164.9 sq km) & Luni basin (133.0 sq km).
4.2 Geological Profile:
The main rock types found in the area are Migmatite, Composite Gneiss, Granite,
Granite Gneiss, Biotite Schist and Calc-silicates. The minerals found are mainly
quartz, feldspar, pyroxene, amphibole, biotite, apatite, muscovite, fluorite, tourmaline
etc. The presence of fluoro-apatitie and the presence of tourmaline is the main
indicator for presence of fluoride which is dissolved in ground water. The soil in this
area is also contaminated in terms of fluoride due to presence of fluoride minerals in
rocks.
Hydrogeology of the area – The water table pattern shows a more or less flat
hydraulic gradient with a general trend of north east direction of ground water
movement. The rock type is almost same throughout the area with fracture and
disintegrated zone. One hundred sixty six wells have been monitored for post
monsoon water table. The water levels in the wells have been collected and
simultaneously latitude, longitude and altitude have been marked through Global
Positioning System (GPS). These locations have been plotted in GIS and water table
with respect to mean sea level has been calculated. On the basis of water table data,
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
17
Water table map has been generated with 3 meter contour interval. This map shows
that the regional trend of ground water movement is towards north east direction in
this area and has been shown in the map. Almost all the area is moderate to low
recharge area, but with a comparative analysis, the south west area is more recharge
prone than the north east and the rest of the area.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
18
4.3 Ecological Profile:
Ecosystem Types of Jahazpur
In a good mosaic of natural and man-engineered ecosystems is found in the
landscape. Thus, the major ecosystem types of whole of Jahazpur area can be broadly
classified into:
1. Natural Ecosystems
Terrestrial Ecosystem
Forest Ecosystem
Grassland Ecosystem
Aquatic Ecosystem
Fresh water Ecosystem
Lentic (Standing-water like ponds/lakes/Reservoirs)
Lotic (Running-water of non-perennial rivers)
2. Man-engineered Ecosystems
Cropland Ecosystem
Farmland Ecosystem
Agro forestry/Orchard Ecosystem
Grassland Ecosystem
Grassland ecosystem is a type of terrestrial ecosystem. Grasslands occupy
comparatively huge stretches of landscape approx. Nearly 9% of the area is under
permanent pastures. These grasslands are at degradation stage of tropical dry
deciduous forests. Both types of grasslands are found in the district. In Jahazpur area,
Dicanthium-Cenchrus-Lasiurus Grassland is found.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
19
Table 1: Grass species present in the area
Flora &Fauna
In hilly area, where forest cover is better, Apluda mutica is seen growing in
abundance. This is an annual tall grass that can grow under partial shade up to some
extent. Along moist shady streams, Ammania pentandra, Bergia ammanoides,
Cyperus rotundus etc grass can be seen. In the plains, Prosopis juliflora, Acacia
nilotica, Azadirecta indica, Acacia lucophloea, Butea monospermum, Anogeisus
pendula and related species, Date Palm along the drainage lines etc are found in
abundance.
The primary consumers are the herbivores feeding on grasses comprising mainly of
cow, buffalo, sheep, hare, blue-buck, mouse, millipedes, centipedes, ants,
grasshoppers, beetles, babbler, crow, Bulbul, etc. Besides, secondary consumers are
those who feed on herbivores. They are hyena, jackal, fox, lizard, snakes, mongoose,
etc. Hawks feed on small secondary consumers, thus becoming the tertiary
consumers. Decomposers active in decay of dead organic matter of different life forms
are fungi like Mucor, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Cladosporium, Rhizophus, Fusarium
etc., and some bacteria and actinomycetes. They bring about the mineral back to the
soil, thus making them available to the producers.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
20
Pond/Reservoir Ecosystem
A pond as a whole serves a good example of a fresh water ecosystem. Jahazpur is a
drought prone area. Therefore, traditionally, ponds/reservoirs/water bodies have
been developed at many places to meet the water requirement/availability for
domestic consumption, irrigation use as well as livestock drinking during stress
period mostly. Coincidentally, these water bodies provide very good aquatic habitats.
Terrestrial animals like migratory birds also find solace for their breeding during
winter.
These ponds are a self-sufficient and self-regulating system. They are very rich in
basic inorganic and organic compounds, such as water itself, carbon dioxide gas,
oxygen gas, calcium, nitrogen, phosphates, amino acids, humic acid, etc. Some
proportions of nutrients are in solution state but most of them are present as stored in
particulate matter as well as in living organisms. Various organisms that constitute
the biotic component like Potamogeton, Hydrilla, Vallisneria, Utricularia, Azolla,
Lemna, Oscillatoria, Anabaena, Chlamydomonas, Spirula etc. A few insects and both
small and large fishes are found in various ponds or lakes.
Non-perennial River Ecosystem
Major rivers of Jahazpur is Banas. The river which was perennial 10 years ago has
become non-perennial now. Numerous small as well as large dams have been
constructed along the river. Not only this stored water provide water for irrigation
and drinking purposes of the people, the reservoirs act as pond/lake ecosystem as
well. Ecologically also, these water systems are very important. Several aquatic life
forms emerge during the period of water-flow, but as soon as they dry up in winter
and summer, the aquatic life suddenly disappears.
As they drive up, the entire tract of their courses glows with the shinning of sands.
Large deposits of gravels and pebbles also occur along the banks. The riverbeds of
some of these rivers are predominantly composed of hard rocks, exposed and literally
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
21
dead. Though some small life forms occur sporadically where the stagnant water is
found along the course.
Cropland Ecosystem
Cropland ecosystems are artificial or man-engineered, where, in order to obtain more
food, cloth, timber, medicines and other useful products, man becomes responsible
for the replacement of natural systems. To secure maximum production, man makes
much planned manipulations in the physico-chemical environment. These include
addition of fertilizers to soil, use of chemicals for disease control, proper irrigation
practices etc. Thus, a cropland ecosystem is an artificial system aimed primarily to
grow a single species of one’s choice.
We have ecosystems of dominant crop species like maize, jowar, wheat, bajra,
vegetables, etc. under suitable conditions of their growth and yield. It is generally
argued that in a natural ecosystem, the nature maximizes for gross production,
whereas in an artificial ecosystem, man maximizes for net production. In a cropland
ecosystem, there is not necessarily an increase in the total dry matter production of
the whole plants, but generally most of the production goes into grain and less into
leaves, stems and roots. Thus, in agriculture, there is an objective to achieve high rate
of production (P) of readily harvestable products with little standing crop (B) left in
the field for accumulation or we may say that there is a high P/B efficiency. Nature,
on the other hand, follows just the reverse efficiency, i.e. a high B/P ratio where the
standing crop is generally accumulated to its maximum.
The pattern of interconnectedness among different components of ecosystem:
Every ecosystem comprises of two major components: Abiotic and Biotic. They are
intricately inter-twined and dependent on each other, and ensure a delicate but
complex ecological linkage leading to nutritional and energy flow through various
trophic levels both within and between ecosystems. The pattern of inter-
connectedness among different components of ecosystems therefore, lies in its explicit
recognition of complexity, interaction, functional processes and change over time.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
22
Functionally, there is a constant exchange of matter and energy between the physical
environment and the living community. Structurally, different components of
ecosystems can be represented as follows:
Abiotic Component
These include the climatic conditions such as rainfall, temperature, wind velocity,
frost, hail, humidity etc. are suitable for the above mentioned crops, especially
maize.
Biotic Component
The various living organisms in the food chain are as follows:
o Producers:
The dominant plant species would naturally be Zea mays, Urad, Jowara and
Till. A number of weeds like Cynodon dactylon, Launnea nudicaulis,
Euphorbia hirta, Cyprus rotundus, Digitaria Spp., Alysicarpus spp. also
contribute to primary production of the field.
o Consumers:
Primary consumers are herbivores represented by a variety of animals, big as
well as small. The smaller animals include chiefly the insects as aphids, trips,
beetles, etc. which feed and lay their eggs on maize leaves. Larger animals are
rabbits, rats, birds and man feeding on leaves, flowers and fruits of maize.
Secondary consumers are carnivores like frogs and some birds that eat insects.
Tertiary consumers are carnivores like snakes and hawks which feed on the
secondary consumers: frogs and small birds. Decomposers are microbes
present in soil as well as air that decompose the dead organic matter of plants
and animals. These are chiefly bacteria, Actinomycetes and fungi responsible
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
23
for decay, decompositions and humification making the minerals available
again to the producers.
Interdependence of different Ecosystems:
Consequent to the manipulation and exploitation of the natural environment by
tremendous human pressure, the natural ecosystems are shrinking and gradually
vanishing into oblivion. Natural ecosystems have been reduced to a few isolated
pockets. Despite this, they still possess or support various food chains within the
system and, in turn, are inter-linked with various other adjoining systems. On the
other hand, man-made ecosystems predominantly occupy the landscape of the project
area. The extensive agricultural fields spread across the area. Food and fodder
security being the major concerns, the system is intensively manipulated as well as
managed by the individual owners.
There exists a general spatial, functional, temporal and complex interdependence
among these ecosystems. Most of the forestlands /Banni (Forest Ecosystems), Gorges
(Lotic Ecosystems) and community-owned & protected plots (Protected & Managed
Grassland Ecosystems) are found in the upper ridges of the hill ranges, while other
ecosystems like ponds/lakes/reservoirs (Lentic Ecosystems), agricultural land,
orchards (Cropland Ecosystems) occur in the low-lying flat lands or valleys in the
area. Though the forests are highly degraded, they provide such benefits to local
people as fuel wood, fodder, fruits, apart from ecological services like interception of
surface run-off, etc. thus, ensuring moisture conservation, ground water recharge,
alleviation of soil cutting &loss, minimizing siltation in reservoirs in the down-stream.
As a cascading effect, the water availability in rivulets, streams, reservoirs and
agricultural fields is enhanced and prolonged. Usually, biological processes and
activities in forest ecosystems are more complex, indicative of higher level of
successional ecological stage. Micro-organisms and microbial activities are found
more in the system, disintegrating and decomposing dead plant and animal and their
parts, helping the system recuperate with nutrients. During precipitation or storm,
some of the nutrients reach the valley area through the flowing water. Consequently,
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
24
the fertility of the agricultural lands is increased, which, in, turn, pushes up the
agricultural land productivity.
Being a drought-prone area with poor average annual rainfall and scanty forest
coverage, major livelihood source of the people is rain-fed agriculture and animal
husbandry. Major crops grown are coarse grains like maize, jowar, which are, in
addition to, being hardy, less water demanding and typical food-habits of dry land
areas, very good fodder crops, especially their leaves and succulent stems. But the
bulk of fodder requirement is mostly fulfilled from Common grasslands. There is,
therefore, tremendous dependence on grazing land. Years of unregulated grazing
have adversely affected the grassland ecosystem. From sustainability point of view,
these lands have been brought to the brink of highly degraded wasteland. Of late,
farmers, particularly big and medium ones, are maintaining a portion of their field as
‘private bids/ grassland’ for meeting fodder for both bovine and small ruminants.
This acts as important secondary source to meet requirement and complementary
adaptive management Therefore, fodder requirement is also increasingly being met
from private agricultural lands.
Farmers, again, use dung cake and pellets as manure in their fields to raise the fertility
as well as productivity. This way, the livestock pressure on commons and forestland
is mitigated. Furthermore, water in reservoirs/ponds is mostly used for drinking
purposes (human and livestock) and irrigation for Rabi crop. So, there is, clearly, a
symbiotic linkage among these systems.
4.4 Land Use Profile
As per the revenue records of these fourteen villages, only 333 ha of land is irrigated
while the remaining is rainfed. Around 9% of the total land area has been categorized
as pasture land. However, the availability of pasture land across the project villages
varies significantly with villages like Baori and Teetora Mafi having more than 10%
pasture land while Gulabpura has only 1.4% of the land as pasture land. Further, the
area does not have forest land. Bilanaam nakabil kasht and bilanaam kabil kasht form
other major land categories in the area.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
25
Map 2: Land use/ land cover map of Jahazpur
Nearly 75% of the land in the area is current fallow. 0.3 and 6.3 percents of the land
are scrub and degraded forest, and other wasteland respectively. Only 1.5 percent of
the area is double/ triple cropped. There are mainly 8 types of land use/land cover
which have been identified from the Land Sat Imageries. Current fallow forms the
largest part of the land area. Nearly 75% lies as fallow in the project area. 7.3 and 7.5
percent of the land is cultivated only in Kharif and Rabi respectively. About 100 ha of
land constituting 1.5% of the land area is double/ triple cropped. Scrub/ degraded
forest land constituting about 1.7 and 6.3 percent of the area respectively can be
prominently seen especially in Taswariya and Baori which is situated in the south
west region of the project area.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
26
4.5 Edaphic Profile:
Soil of Jahazpur generally comes under great a group which is dominated by antisols
& alfisols of having brown color in domination. It ranges from dark brown to light
pale brown & grey color. On the basis of texture of soil, Jahazpur soils can be
classified in to sandy loam to clay loam. In this type of soil, percolation of water is
good to medium. Most of the soils are calcareous in nature generally this calcareous
layer is found between the 50 to 100 cm. In some patches saline and alkaline soils are
also found. Organic carbon in the soil in Jahazpur ranges from 0.15 to 0.67%. Nitrogen
in surface layer is generally low across the physiographic region in the area where as
P2O5 and K2O is medium. In general N and P status of intensively cultivated in plains
and valleys is relatively low and K is high compared to hills and pediments. Available
Cu and Mn are generally adequate, whereas available Zn and Fe is low to marginal. In
Vindhyan and Aravali available micronutrient is generally high in valley/plain as
compared to hills and pediment. However available micronutrient is generally low in
intensively cultivated area of eastern plain.
Soil depth
Soil Depth suggests the volume of soil from which roots can acquire nutrient and
water for their growth. In Jahazpur district moderately shallow soil constitute 37.3%,
moderately deep to deep 27.2%, besides rock outcrops is 13.73 %.
Texture
It affects soil characteristics directly or indirectly and gives an idea of soil water
retention, availability of water to plants, soil genesis, infiltration rate, and drainage
and crop suitability class. Particle size class distribution of soil of Jahazpur shows
predominance of fine loamy to fine soils (63.8%). Surface textural class distribution in
soils of Bhilwara shows predominant sandy loam soils (46.8%) followed by sandy clay
loam to clay (36%). Sandy loam soil constitutes more than 50% in Aravali landscape
and eastern plain.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
27
Soil Erosion
Soil of Jahazpur is moderately to severely eroded mainly by rivers and nallahs, mostly
during the rainy months. Besides, stagnation of water has given rise to the problem of
salinity and alkalinity.
4.6 Socio-Demographic Profile:
The project area consists of a total population
of 11905 with nearly 33% of the population
belonging to the Scheduled Caste and
Scheduled Tribe communities. The sex ratio
in the area is 963. The area has a low level of
literacy of 37.63% as compared to 50.74% at
the district level. With the female literacy
rate being a mere 18.44%, the status of
literacy in the area is one of the indicators of
the deplorable plight of the women in the
area.
As per the baseline survey conducted in the fourteen villages of the project area, there
are 2969 households with a total population of 11688. The size of the villages vary
from less than 100 households in villages like Gulabpura, Jaswantpura, Thagariya and
Bheempura to more than 350 households in Titodi Mafi, Titodi and Bavdi. Some of the
predominant communities inhabiting the area include Gujjar, Reger, Meena, Bheel,
Khatik, Jat, Rajput, Vaishnav, Brahmin, Naik and Nath. As high as 56% of the households
belong to Other Backward Classes while 34% of the households hail from
communities categorized as Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes.
Age-wise distribution of the population shows that children and youth constitute a
significant portion of the population. This indicates that efforts to channelize the
Table 3: Demographic Profile of Jahazpur Project Area, 2001
POPULATION 2001
Total population 11905
Male Population (%) 50.94
Female Population (%) 49.06
Sex ratio (female per thousand males) 963
% Population of Scheduled Caste 21.54
% Population of Scheduled Tribe 11.83
Literacy rate Total (percent) 37.63
Literacy rate male (percent) 56.11
Literacy rate female (percent) 18.44
Source: Government of Rajasthan and Census of India
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
28
Figure 1: Age-wise distribution of population Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Figure 2: Mean Income from different sources Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
energies of these people and tapping
their untapped potentials would
lead to an improved quality of life
and the overall development of the
area. Simultaneously, while 28% of
the population are in between 35-60
years of age, a mere 8% of the total
population are above 60 years. One of
the most direct inferences that one
can draw from this figure is that the
status of health is poor in the area
and effective measures need to be undertaken to address the health related issues. The
status of health and sanitation in the area is poor. Presence of fluoride in the water
beyond the permissible limits is one of the most important concerns in this area.
Dental fluorosis and skeleton fluorosis are two of the most common diseases which
the people in the area suffer from. Instances of fluorosis and disability is high
particulary in the villages like Baori, Bheelri, Teetori and Teetora Mafi where the
fluoride concentration is high (Annexure 1). Absence of effective measures to address
this has aggravated this.
4.7 Livelihood Profile
Agriculture and animal husbandry
have been central to the livelihoods of
the people living in this area.
Frequent occurrences of drought in
the recent years has however,
increased the vulnerability of the
farming communities. Increased
pressure on land, decline in the
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
29Figure 3: Distribution of landholding categories Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
productivity of agricultural land combined with shrinking of forests and common
pasture land has threatened the viability of farming as a primary livelihood option in
the area.
Only 45% of the income is derived from farming and the people have to resort to
other options for sustaining their families. Low levels of literacy, absence of
programmes for developing skills particularly in the non-farm sector and limited
access to basic infrastructural facilities and services has impinged on the people’s
right to choose the best livelihood option. Migration can be seen as a prominent
phenomenon with nearly 13% of the income coming from migration. Launch of
MGNERGA has helped in generating employment in the area with about 13% of the
income of the people being derived from working on MGNREGA sites.
Development Indicators:
Sl.No. Development Indicators State Project area
Per Capita Income 16260 12660
Poverty Ratio 0.22 0.37
Literacy % 0.60 0.58
Sex Ratio 921 933
4.7.1. Agriculture
Land and water resources have been the key drivers of farm based production
systems which form the predominant source of livelihoods of the people in this area.
The area is characterized by land
based economy. Land has also been
crucial in defining the social and
political relations of the people in the
area. 25% of the households are
landless while 55% are small and
marginal farmers. With very low
landholdings and subject to vagaries of
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
30
nature agriculture remains a high risk-
low input-low output activity.
The area mostly has sandy loam to
clay loam soil where the percolation of
water ranges from good to medium.
Most of the soil is calcareous while in
some patches, saline and alkaline soil is also found. The soil is moderately to severely
eroded mainly by rivers and nallahs. Substitution of organic fertilizer with chemical
fertilizer has further worsened the soil quality. The nature of agriculture and farming
practices is also strongly conditioned by the availability of water. Depletion in the
surface as well as ground water resources has adversely affected agriculture. Some of
the villages in the area have access to canal and tank irrigation; wells are the most
common source of irrigation. The farmers mostly use engine to draw water for
irrigation from wells. Besides, flood irrigation is a common practice that can be found
in the area.
Kharif is the main cropping season in the area. Major cereals grown during Kharif
include maize, bajra and jowar. Crop production during Rabi remains limited to such
farmlands which have access to irrigation. Wheat is the main cereal crop grown
during Rabi. Besides cereal crops, pulses, fodder crops like rajka and oilseeds such as
groundnut and mustard are also cultivated in the area. Over the years, the
agricultural practices have undergone a remarkable change in the area. Besides the
traditional plough, tractors are also being increasingly used. Chemical fertilizer is
used intensively. The types of seeds, pesticide and fertilizer across the different
villages in the area are detailed in the tables below:
Table 4: Households Accessing Different Sources of Irrigation
Villages Wells Tanks Borewell Canal Baori 257 7 2 3
Bheelri 87 1 0 0
Bheempura 51 0 0 0
Gandher 190 49 1 49
Gokulpura 24 0 0 0
Gulabpura 21 0 0 0
Indokia 138 47 0 0
Jaswantpura 13 1 0 0
Maganpura 142 1 0 0
Sihana 49 16 0 0
Dhagariya 58 0 0 0
Taswariya 157 32 4 28
Teetori 212 8 0 2
Teetora Mafi 96 1 0 0
Total 1495 163 7 82
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
31
Table 5: Households following various agricultural practices for maize
Village Seed from home
Hybrid seed Certified seed
Chemical pesticide
Organic pesticide
Chemical fertilizer
Baori 295 21 76 68 8 293
Bheelri 101 7 8 23 6 99
Bheempura 64 12 5 11 3 64
Gandher 190 24 24 53 18 187
Gokulpura 78 6 5 22 2 71
Gulabpura 40 5 1 3 0 41
Indokia 169 29 25 53 19 171
Jaswantpura 49 7 1 10 1 47
Maganpura 142 14 13 51 12 141
Sihana 74 9 6 18 5 65
Dhagariya 31 2 1 6 2 30
Taswariya 134 17 34 27 13 132
Teetori 131 20 57 43 19 131
Teetora Mafi 75 51 69 69 56 115
Total 1573 224 325 457 164 1587
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Table 6: Households following various agricultural practices for wheat
Seed from home Hybrid seed
Certified seed
Chemical pesticide
Organic pesticide
Chemical fertilizer
Baori 226 33 51 50 6 221
Bheelri 63 12 5 12 2 64
Bheempura 40 6 1 8 0 38
Gandher 132 25 23 41 13 137
Gokulpura 61 8 2 17 0 60
Gulabpura 32 8 2 3 0 35
Indokia 112 24 21 33 11 117
Jaswantpura 28 6 0 7 0 26
Maganpura 83 18 8 27 5 85
Sihana 40 10 3 9 2 39
Dhagariya 17 6 0 2 1 19
Taswariya 85 23 28 17 9 89
Teetori 91 15 43 20 12 89
Teetora Mafi 37 8 10 10 2 36
Total 1047 202 197 256 63 1055
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
32
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Table 7: Households following various agricultural practices for Jowar/Bajra
Seed from home Hybrid seed
Certified seed
Chemical pesticide
Organic pesticide
Chemical fertilizer
Baori 30 6 7 17 3 30
Bheelri 14 2 3 4 3 15
Bheempura 7 1 0 2 0 5
Gandher 26 10 12 15 6 31
Gokulpura 10 1 0 2 0 8
Gulabpura 6 1 1 0 0 7
Indokia 30 10 15 16 10 34
Jaswantpura 5 1 0 1 1 4
Maganpura 25 2 3 8 2 23
Sihana 8 2 2 1 1 6
Dhagariya 2 1 0 1 0 2
Taswariya 18 8 10 10 8 17
Teetori 15 9 11 13 10 18
Teetora Mafi 6 1 1 2 1 5
Total 202 55 65 92 45 205 Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Table 8: Households following various agricultural practices for groundnut
Seed from home Hybrid seed
Certified seed
Chemical pesticide
Organic pesticide
Chemical fertilizer
Baori 7 0 2 1 0 5
Bheelri 6 0 1 2 1 7
Bheempura 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gandher 8 2 0 2 0 5
Gokulpura 6 0 0 1 0 6
Gulabpura 3 0 0 1 0 2
Indokia 8 1 2 1 0 9
Jaswantpura 1 1 0 0 0 2
Maganpura 5 0 0 0 0 5
Sihana 4 0 0 1 0 4
Dhagariya 2 0 0 0 0 2
Taswariya 3 0 1 1 0 3
Teetori 1 0 0 1 0 1
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
33
Teetora Mafi 3 0 1 0 0 3
Total 57 4 7 11 1 54
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
4.7.2. Livestock
Agriculture supplemented with livestock keeping forms the basis of sustenance for
the farmers in this area. Crop residue and grazing provides fodder and forage to
livestock. Livestock keeping on the other hand acts as a drought power and source of
energy, nutrition and manure. The symbiotic relation between the two systems is
clearly visible and change in one has a direct impact on the other. As per the baseline
survey, livestock rearing contributes 17% of the income of the people in the area.
The livestock composition shows that smaller ruminants are more than the larger
ruminants. However, the number of cows is much higher than other animals in the
area. Degradation of common grazing lands and frequent occurrences of drought in
the recent years has raised serious questions pertaining to fodder security in the area.
Loss of vegetative cover as a result of high degrees of soil erosion and overgrazing has
adversely affected the productivity of these common grazing lands. Changes in the
cropping pattern along with the substitution of organic fertilizer with chemical
fertilizer reduced the fertility of the soil as well as the quality of fodder available from
crop residue. Further, frequent occurrences of drought leading to crop failure also
affected the fodder availability from crop residue which has increased the pressure on
the already overexploited common grazing land. The factors mentioned above have
not only led to a decline in the productivity of the livestock but have also increased
instances of distress sale of livestock.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
34
Figure 4: Distribution of BPL and APL households Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
4.7.3. Poverty Trends
As per the baseline survey, there are 991 households
below poverty line in the area which constitutes
33.4% of the population. The percentage of BPL is
higher in villages like Gulabpura, Indokia,
Taswariya and Titodi as compared to the other
villages of the area. The table shows the
distribution of BPL households across the
different social categories. The proportion of BPL to APL households is higher among
those belonging to the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes as compared to other
communities. Nearly 53% of the households hailing from the Scheduled Castes are
below poverty line in this area as compared to 23% in case of those belonging to the
General category.
Table 9: Livestock composition in Jahazpur
Cow Buffalo Sheep Goat
Baori 648 229 462 674
Bheelri 252 137 99 131
Bheempura 110 84 279 166
Gandher 717 260 436 380
Gokulpura 205 113 432 177
Gulabpura 90 25 8 65
Indokia 657 275 319 499
Jaswantpura 221 56 361 189
Maganpura 484 217 90 218
Sihana 529 191 132 401 Dhagariya 295 128 75 157 Taswariya 828 353 818 972 Teetori 710 342 282 503 Teetora Mafi 471 268 606 450
Total 6217 2678 4399 4982 Source: Livestock Census, 2008
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
35
In an economy which largely demands skilled manpower, lack of skill enhancement
opportunities is an added disadvantage for the people in this area. Most of the people
in the area who have resorted to non-farm employment end up as daily wage earners
in the nearby cities. The ones who migrate to
cities have to leave their families back in the
village as their earning in the city is not able
to substitute returns from farm but only
supplement it. As per the baseline survey,
about 18% of the households in the area
migrate. Migration to cities and towns is
usually in mining and quarrying,
construction and in some small trading and
manufacturing work.
4.7.4. Livelihood Needs of the People:
As per the baseline survey, the livelihood
needs of the people in the area are as
follows:
Table 11: Training requirements of the people in the area Agriculture 437
Animal Husbandry 174
Computer 328
Dairying 103
Driving 31
Electrical Works 2
Household Industry 58
Kasidakari 134
Land Development 1
Mechanic works 8
Mid-Wife Training 1
Mobile Repair 1
Others 240
Poultry farming 37
Stitching 529
Total 2084
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Table 10: Households Migrating
HH % of total
HH Baori 74 18.23 Bheelri 18 12.41 Bheempura 10 10.64 Gandher 40 14.93 Gokulpura 14 14 Gulabpura 6 12 Indokia 41 15.13 Jaswantpura 9 13.85 Maganpura 39 16.46 Sihana 22 15.94 Dhagariya 17 21.25 Taswariya 66 19.64 Teetori 91 22.75 Teetora Mafi 88 23.22
Total 535 18.02 Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
36
Table 12: Households that indicated a need for various land development activities and physical interventions
Village Land
Development Farm
Bunding Farm Pond
Continuous Contour
Trench (CTT) Check Dam Anicut
Baori 0 317 91 15 2 12
Bheelri 0 101 15 13 9 10
Bheempura 2 70 24 4 25 5
Gandher 36 198 35 0 5 19
Gokulpura 0 64 1 0 0 0
Gulabpura 0 37 19 4 1 21
Indokia 1 139 3 0 0 3
Jaswantpura 1 33 1 0 0 0
Maganpura 113 187 124 89 139 131
Sihana 1 85 1 0 0 0 Dhagariya 0 57 33 1 1 4 Taswariya 10 245 27 34 3 19 Teetori 0 298 24 2 1 12 Teetora Mafi 28 210 62 1 77 37
Total 192 2041 460 163 263 273
Source: Baseline survey (2010)
Table 13: Households that indicated a need for new well or well deepening
New Well Well Deepening
Baori 43 132
Bheelri 22 58
Bheempura 20 36
Gandher 71 90
Gokulpura 24 23
Gulabpura 6 13
Indokia 11 93
Jaswantpura 12 13
Maganpura 173 168
Sihana 7 47
Dhagariya 8 19
Taswariya 56 75
Teetori 40 146
Teetora Mafi 80 94
Total 573 1007
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
37
Table 14: Households that indicated the need for various agriculture-related services
Villages Crop
Exhibition Live
Fencing Seed
Production Vermi
Compost Gypsum
Application Nursery Farm
Implements Plant
Protection
Baori 3 185 1 4 242 39 27 0
Bheelri 4 84 0 0 93 10 14 0
Bheempura 37 51 2 10 57 14 29 2
Gandher 0 51 3 2 54 7 21 7
Gokulpura 0 59 0 0 35 1 0 0
Gulabpura 0 17 1 6 22 17 6 2
Indokia 0 133 0 0 77 15 1 0
Jaswantpura 0 32 0 0 25 1 0 0
Maganpura 112 118 113 112 154 121 133 119
Sihana 0 84 2 0 56 12 0 0
Dhagariya 11 43 0 0 24 0 2 0
Taswariya 9 126 2 5 90 34 8 4
Teetori 3 287 0 0 255 80 31 0
Teetora Mafi
12 203 49 64 170 71 81 50
Total HHs 191 1473 173 203 1354 422 353 184
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Table 15: Households that indicated a need for irrigation facilities
Villages Pipeline for Irrigation Sprinkler irrigation Drip Irrigation
Baori 85 1 16
Bheelri 40 8 2
Bheempura 27 12 6
Gandher 107 11 18
Gokulpura 0 0 0
Gulabpura 12 4 3
Indokia 37 0 4
Jaswantpura 0 0 0
Maganpura 151 126 130
Sihana 21 1 5
Dhagariya 15 0 0
Taswariya 40 3 8
Teetori 38 0 6
Teetora Mafi 110 75 82
Total 683 241 280
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
38
Table 16: Households that indicated a need for breed improvement services
Villages Cow Breed
Improvement Buffalo Breed Improvement
Goat Breed Improvement
Sheep Breed Improvement
Baori 116 203 65 3
Bheelri 58 91 32 8
Bheempura 44 50 35 5
Gandher 141 239 64 11
Gokulpura 35 48 57 34
Gulabpura 13 25 19 1
Indokia 36 32 28 5
Jaswantpura 26 26 28 17
Maganpura 185 196 153 126
Sihana 40 40 37 12
Dhagariya 15 58 5 2
Taswariya 95 112 94 19
Teetori 122 190 61 9
Teetora Mafi 314 311 131 28
Total HHs 1240 1621 809 280
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Table 17: Households that indicated a need for various livestock related services
Villages Fodder Improvement Artificial Insemination Livestock Insurance
Baori 3 80 93
Bheelri 1 19 62
Bheempura 6 4 40
Gandher 6 33 38
Gokulpura 0 22 2
Gulabpura 1 0 2
Indokia 0 95 3
Jaswantpura 0 18 0
Maganpura 119 118 152
Sihana 0 49 0
Dhagariya 0 0 1
Taswariya 6 16 76
Teetori 4 201 157
Teetora Mafi 17 27 40
Total HHs 163 682 666
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
39
Table 18: Households that seek information and capacity building services
Villages No. of HHs that want Information
Services No. of HHs that seek Capacity
Building Services
Baori 250 239
Bheelri 93 69
Bheempura 23 14
Gandher 19 7
Gokulpura 0 30
Gulabpura 45 45
Indokia 46 122
Jaswantpura 0 19
Maganpura 111 110
Sihana 36 59
Dhagariya 9 2
Taswariya 190 190
Teetori 73 140
Teetora Mafi 2 17
Total HHs 897 1063
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Table 19: Households that indicated a need for resource center in their village
Villages Number of HHs
Baori 198
Bheelri 46
Bheempura 10
Gandher 5
Gokulpura 1
Gulabpura 44
Indokia 13
Jaswantpura 0
Maganpura 110
Sihana 7
Dhagariya 0
Taswariya 139
Teetori 15
Teetora Mafi 1
Total 589
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
40
Table 19: Households that indicated a need for SHG and Consumer Group
Study Village SHG CG
Baori 87 34
Bheelri 27 7
Bheempura 27 1
Gandher 52 10
Gokulpura 55 45
Gulabpura 36 0
Indokia 136 91
Jaswantpura 39 33
Maganpura 128 114
Sihana 81 41
Dhagariya 1 0
Taswariya 66 3
Teetori 97 74
Teetora Mafi 127 30
Total 959 483
Source: Baseline Survey (2010)
5. Elements of Work 5.1 Ecologically sound regeneration
While Nature functions as a fairly independent system and could perhaps rejuvenate
and reach an equally good state in the long run, the direct and immediate impact of
the degradation of natural systems would decimate several species and severely affect
the poor who depend on natural surroundings for their survival. Moreover the scale
and extent of degradation of the natural surroundings and the inadequate attention
that such fundamental concerns receive in development planning brings us face-to-
face with a situation where concerted action is necessary to halt and reverse such
trends. We also observe that ecological degradation is mostly caused by social and
economic factors necessitating an interdisciplinary action in safeguarding Nature. A
few of the phases of ecological restoration inculcates in (i) assisting village
communities in protecting their forests and grazing lands to enable natural
regeneration of the existing rootstock and (ii) assessing the stock and flow of biomass,
biodiversity and water across natural and production systems so as to place the
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
41
relevance of the efforts on regeneration and bring to the table an informed discussion
around the permissible levels of extraction so as to draw strategies for conservation
action.
5.2 Institutional mechanism
Good governance has been seen as a panacea to make development efforts
meaningful for the citizens - that which enables citizens and communities to fulfill
their lives and destinies, enable people to create sustainable livelihoods for
themselves, facilitate the fulfillment of basic needs, and promote an attitude of self-
reliance. Institutional process involve in strengthening, nurturing and reviving of
village institutions and working towards enabling them to gain a sound legal foothold
on the natural resources, where it is uncertain or disputed, and where a legal
provision exists.
5.3 Building dialogue and discussion
We know that any progress will require a complex of social, political and economic
changes. The challenge ahead is to synergize scientific and technological innovation
with a much greater capacity for institutional innovation. Such innovation and
change relies to a large extent on the effectiveness with which a diversity of
stakeholders with different interests and from different sectors and scales can interact.
In such a context, there is an increasing recognition that governing a landscape is no
longer solely the domain of government. Evidences show that due to the complexities
of socio-economic and political environments government cannot govern forest and
nature on its own. The rapid processes of decentralization and devolution that is
taking place around the world indicates the need to shift towards collaborative
governance in which various actors (e.g. governments, local communities, local
entrepreneurs and civil society) are expected to co-manage resources such as forest
and nature.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
42
Although multi-stakeholder processes (MSPs) are based on recognising the
importance of achieving equity and accountability between stakeholders, win-win
solutions are not always possible. The complexity of issues and stakes, across different
levels and timescales, may lead to a negotiated compromise in which win-lose or even
lose-lose solutions have to be accepted. In such situations it is critical to understand
the role of the state as (at least in theory) the protector of the common good for the
long-term. Policy makers often find themselves caught between their public service
duties, short-term electoral interests and the splintered interests of different
stakeholder groups.
Setting up and facilitating long term processes that bring different groups into
constructive engagements, dialogue and decision making towards good governance
of the landscape. Processes that aim to involve stakeholders in improving situations
that affect them; forms of social interaction that enable different individuals and
groups, who are affected by an issue, to enter into dialogue, negotiation, learning,
decision making and collective action; about getting government staff, policy makers,
community representatives, scientists, business people and NGO representatives to
think and work together.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
43
6. Components of Work
6.1 Capacity Building and Community Mobilization
Training and exposure enhances knowledge, skill, attitude and human relationships.
Though, a number of measures had been taken in this regard, experiences show that
the training programmes should aim at (i) strengthening those processes, skills and
knowledge that help in the delivery of various watershed development activities; (ii)
improving the quality of watershed management and its governance iii) providing
more number of relevant trainings involving more community participation
particularly rural women and; (iv) strengthening the various habitation level
institutions by promoting traditional practices of good governance mechanism of
Natural Resources.
6.2 Work on landscape component 6.2.1 Work on arable land
Arable land constitutes ha of the total project area. The area has minimal slope and
is less undulated. The community primarily depends on agriculture and animal
husbandry for sustaining their livelihoods. Discussions with community and
intensive survey revealed that these areas are prone to soil erosion due to runoff,
wrong agronomic practices and poor vegetation. As soil depth is moderately low and
regular erosion of valuable top soil has its impact on not only decreasing the
productivity levels but also raising the question of sustainability of the most critical
production system. Presently there is least physical measures to retain soil moisture
for longer periods which leads to increasing exploitation of groundwater for irrigation
and for poor farmers frequent crop failures due to lack of water availability at
different phases of crop growth.
Work to restore the functionality of this component of landscape will involve not only
intensive physical treatment but also regular discussions and awareness building of
the communities to adopt better agronomic practices like rotational cropping, use of
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
44
green/organic manure, agro-forestry etc., Focus will be to increase the productivity of
each land unit per drop of water which not only help in raising farm incomes both in
terms of food grains and fodder but also leads to sustainable and judicious use of
resources.
Physical treatments planned constitute of measures to harvest water which provide
soil moisture for longer periods. The physical treatment measures will also aim to
minimize soil erosion under safe levels. Activities planned to address these includes
farm ponds, farm bunds, gully plugs and loose boulder check dam keeping in view
the parameters like soil depth, slope, vegetation, erodibility and rainfall.
6.2.2 Work on non arable land
These are the most degraded portions in the landscape with very low productivity
due to continuous process of soil erosion which has in many pockets completely
removed the soil cover. Lack of any physical treatment measures, very low vegetative
cover and prolonged neglect to effectively manage them, has led to non functionality
of this landscape component to provide any substantial goods and services which
have played a critical role in sustaining farming and livestock systems in semi arid
conditions. These landscape components also play a critical role in nutrient and water
transfer and have a organic link with private lands. The project will intensively focus
on these common and private wastelands to build spaces for poor who mainly
depend on these marginal lands to meet their resource needs. Restoration of these
lands will also aim to strengthen the intricate link these have with the low lying farm
lands and strengthen ecological security.
The physical activities planned will address two main components of regeneration
and soil and water conservation. However crafting and strengthening strong
institutions which can establish strong governance on these lands will be the key to
sustainability of these physical measures.
Regeneration Activities:
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
45
On village grazing lands: the project plans to regenerate ha of Panchayat
grazing lands with appropriate mix of trees and grasses.
On revenue lands: The project aims improve the productive capacity of the
ha of revenue wastelands which have been subject to acute degradation.
Efforts would be made to increase the soil moisture regime by appropriate soil and
moisture conservation activities such as:
Contour Trenching
Earthen gully plugs
Loose Boulder Check Dam
6.2.3 Drainage line treatment
Stream orders of 1, 2 and 3 are present in the project area. Firstly it is observed that
due to minimal slope sheath erosion is very prominent leading to extensive
siltasion in the drains. Secondly the drainage density combined with geological
understanding of the area shows a high recharge potential in the area.
The project aims in this context to further enhance the recharge with combination
of various physical measures to check water flow and harvest water. The project
also aim to enhance the availability of surface and ground water through the
construction of various water harvesting and recharge structures such as:
Masonry Check Dam
Earthen structure
Gabions
Stone slab structures
The structures primarily aim to check runoff, soil erosion and enhance recharge.
These structures also have been aimed to serve as structures for livestock drinking.
6.3 Livelihood promotion activities
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
46
Poverty alleviation programme is not an exclusive entity but will necessarily include
dynamic nature and integration of range of context specific interventions. Poverty
itself is an abstract phenomenon and requires sensitization of beneficiaries,
implementers and the policy workers. Collective associations will be basis of
intervention strategy. Diversification of livelihood alternatives with ecological and
social considerations will be the guiding principle. Skill enhancement will open new
opportunities to strengthen the employment options.
Poverty alleviation programme should closely knit the concurrent context specific
realities and then draw a household specific dynamic plan which can be updated in
the subsequent stages, since the intervention requirement will change automatically.
The major challenge is poverty among working people. The poor needs a number of
(new) employment opportunities to come out of the poverty.
6.4 Use of Non conventional energy:
Energy conservation with Bio-Gas:
Energy conservation programme under the watershed project is associated with multi
lateral objectives. This is not only use of non conventional energy source, but
recycling the dung cakes will ensure further additional benefits to farm production.
Use of Pressure cookers & Energy efficient Solar lights:
Efficient energy usage will be promoted by promoting usage of pressure cookers,
Solar lights with additional multipurpose facility will be promoted to popularize the
use of non convention energy and diversify the dependency on multiple energy bases.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
47
CHAPTER V Year-wise Plan for 5 Panchayat
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
48
Annexure Water Quality of Jahazpur Project Area:
Water quality is a very broad subject as it is affected by a plethora of factors. A study
was undertaken wherein samples were collected from different wells and hand
pumps in the project area. pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, salinity,
dissolved oxygen, fluoride concentration and turbiity at different temperature were
tested using various reagents and instruments.
The result of the analysis is as follows:
MAP4: Location of Sample collection in Jahazpur Project area
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
49
Table2: Water Quality data for Jahazpur Project Area.
pH Levels in Surface and Groundwater Wells
The trends in pH in Jahazpur project area are clear with definite patterns. To begin
with, the normal pH values for drinking water should be from 6.5-8.5 (Freeze, 1979).
The lowest obtained pH value is 6.58 and the highest is 7.9. pH levels are highest in
the wells around the northeast part of the watershed and in the southern part (mainly
in Gandher, Gulabpura and Bheelri). (ref: Map 5). Wells with low pH values are in
the middle of the watershed (in the rest of the villages). Additionally, pH differs
between sub-surface aquifer groundwater and surface well water. The surface water
wells ranged from being acidic to basic whereas the deep groundwater from the hand
pump was basic with high pH values. Possible reasons for these trends are differences
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
50
Map5: pH in Ground water of Jahazpur project area.
in ion concentrations in the different wells. Wells with high pH values are near farms,
which are also rich in ions that come from fertilizers as well as the crops planted in
the fields. The alkaline nature of the fields that are rich in minerals add to the high
pH of well water. Ground water was also full of alkaline minerals possibly because
water percolating through the ground to the deep aquifers is exposed to a number of
ions and minerals in the soil. Thus, most of the wells have normal pH values. High
pH values in some of the wells could be due to the ions in the minerals that shift the
equilibrium of hydronium towards the hydroxide side. The low pH values are due to
an increase in the hydronium ion in well water. Water with high pH content is called
hard water (Freeze, 1979). Hard water is not adverse to health, but in large quantities,
it poses some health risks. Other effects of hard water are deposits in faucets or pipes
as well as a slight bitter taste in water (EPA, 2010). Low pH water under the value of
six is called soft water. Soft water could contain trace metals such as copper, mercury,
and lead. These metals are harmful to health and the acidic soft water is very
dangerous should not be used for drinking purposes (EPA, 2010). Thus, the high pH
in the wells and the groundwater by itself will not pose any significant health risks,
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
51
Map6: Salinity map in ground water of jahazpur project area.
but will change the taste of the water as well as leave deposits of various precipitates
when the water is collected. Soft water in some of the wells is very dangerous to
health as it fosters the growth of bacteria and many diseases (Freeze 1979).
Additionally, soft water with low pH values can corrode pipelines or pumps over
time. Water from the lower pH wells is not suitable to drink because of a higher
probability of bacterial growth in these wells.
Salinity Levels in Surface and Groundwater Wells
Map 6 depicts the distribution of salinity in wells in the Jahazpur project area. Salinity
is basically a measurement of all the salt concentrations in the water such as sodium
chloride, magnesium chloride, magnesium sulfate etc. The soil is not rich with
different ions because there are no fields there and the vegetation is sparse.
Drinking water with salinity of 100 ppm is the norm for drinking water, and salinity
up to 500 ppm is acceptable in many situations (EPA, 2010). Salinity must stay below
500 ppm if the water is for drinking. For irrigation purposes, it is ideal if salinity is
lower than 2000 ppm (EPA, 2010). The maximum salinity obtained is 10700 ppm in a
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
52
hand pump which is much greater than normal acceptable one. But this is a case for
only one hanpump and the reason may be the occurrence of local salt dome beneath
the surface. Otherwise the maximum salinity in the open wells is 2500 ppm and
minimum is 400 ppm.
The salinity is more in the villages of Gulabpura, Bheelri, Maganpura and some part
of Teetora mafi and rest of the area is acceptable in terms of salinity of the ground
water for drinking water purpose.
Conductivity in Surface and Groundwater Wells:
The conductivity of the watershed as depicted in map 7 is a measure of ion
concentration in the wells of the area. Data from the field indicates that conductivity is
very low in the north eastern side of the project area (mainly in Gandher village) and
increases drastically towards the south western side (Taswariya village). The wells in
the northern side have the lowest conductivity, whereas in the central and south
western portion, the water has the highest conductivity in the watershed. The second
trend indicates an increase in conductivity from the surface water to the groundwater.
Groundwater from the hand-pump has a very high conductivity while most of the
surface wells in the watershed have a comparatively lower conductivity.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
53
Map7: Electrical conductivity map of Jahazpur project area.
The reasons for variations in conductivity lie in the nature of conductivity itself.
Conductivity is a measure of the ease with which electrons can flow through a
substance. Conductivity increases with the presence of ions in any solution. Hence,
water with the highest concentration of ions will have the highest conductivity.
Watershed well data shows that water towards the southern side of the watershed as
well as groundwater has higher conductivity than northern side and surface water
and this is due to the accumulation of ions in the water as it flows toward the rich
lowland soils. As this is also where farms are situated, fertilizers increase the ion
concentration in the ground and the conductivity of the wells near the fields is
increased. The groundwater is also rich in ions than surface water because of
percolation through the soil. As the water percolates down into the aquifers, the ion
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
54
concentration in the water increases as it is exposed to rich soil throughout the
lowlands of the watershed.
The effects of high conductivity on health are dependent on which ions are causing
the high conductivity. Ions such as nitrate and copper are very harmful in small
quantities while potassium and sodium require very high concentrations to be
harmful. However, conductivity must be below 0.5 mS/cm in general for drinking
water (EPA, 2010). Wells with conductivity of 1.1 mS/cm, are potentially harmful for
people.
Dissolved Solids in Groundwater:
The total dissolved solids in each of the wells of Jahazpur watershed is shown in map
8. There are two trends of importance in this map. The first, total dissolved salt
values increase from Eastern side to the western side. Secondly, groundwater in
Gulabpura, Bheelri has more dissolved salts than rest of the area. Well water in the
Gandher is devoid of ions and minerals because soil in this area may be without any
ions or minerals to enrich it. Therefore, the data show that wells in this area have low
total dissolved solids. On the other hand, are rich in minerals and ions, which are
associated with extensive vegetation and farms that exist in this region of this
watershed area and these minerals are present in wells. Groundwater will also have
relatively larger total dissolved solids than surface well water. Groundwater is
surface water percolated down through the soil and into sub-surface aquifers. Ions
accumulate in the water as it percolates down in to the sub-surface aquifers.
Additionally, groundwater at the drainage basin, where the hand-pump (WT5) is
located, will be full of salts due to the coming together of all the salt rich streams in
the watershed or may be due to presence of salt dome locally.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
55
Map8: Total Dissolve solid map of Jahazpur project area.
The impact of total dissolved solids on health is dependent upon solids that are
dissolved in the water. The recommended concentration limit by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency of total dissolved solids is 500 ppm (Freeze, 1979).
The highest value in the project area is about 8580 ppm. By these standards, water in
some wells of the watershed is harmful for drinking.
Temperature in Surface and Groundwater:
Temperature itself is not a health risk but may lead to many health hazards. High
temperature waters are breeding grounds for many kinds of bacteria. Additionally,
temperature is inversely associated with pH and dissolved oxygen content, which
may affect the quality of water in question. But in case of the studied area, the
temperature is almost varying from 28 to 30 degree Celsius which is not harmful.
Dissolved Oxygen in Groundwater:
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
56
The dissolved oxygen content of wells in the project area is represented in map9. The
dissolved oxygen content is very high in Gandher, Maganpura, Gulabpura, part of
Teetori and Bheelri. There are handpumps (WT5, WT20) in the area those have a very
high dissolved oxygen content. As a whole, however, the dissolved oxygen content of
wells is high in the above mentioned villages and low everywhere else in the
watershed.
Map9: Dissolve oxygen in ground water in Jahazpur project area.
Temperature is related to dissolved oxygen content very closely. When temperature
is low, the dissolved oxygen content is high. The dissolved oxygen itself may not
determine the quality of water. Oxygen is harmless when dissolved in water and so
the dissolved oxygen concentration cannot deteriorate water quality. Additionally,
high dissolved oxygen content is needed to sustain aquatic life and there is a higher
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
57
Map10: Turbidity map of ground water in Jahazpur project area.
chance of bacterial contamination as well. Thus, dissolved oxygen content is related
to other characteristics of water that may directly affect water quality in the wells.
Turbidity of the Water:
Turbidity is the cloudiness or haziness of a fluid caused by individual particles
(suspended solids) that are generally invisible to the naked eye, similar to smoke in
air. The measurement of turbidity is a key test of water quality. Fluids can contain
suspended solid matter consisting of particles of many different sizes.
While some suspended material will be large enough and heavy enough to settle
rapidly to the bottom of the container if a liquid sample is left to stand (the settable
solids), very small particles will settle only very slowly or not at all if the sample is
regularly agitated or the particles are colloidal. These small solid particles cause the
liquid to appear turbid.
In drinking water, the higher the turbidity level, the higher the risk that people may
develop gastrointestinal diseases [citation needed]. This is especially problematic for
immune-compromised people, because contaminants like viruses or bacteria can
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
58
become attached to the suspended solid. The suspended solids interfere with water
disinfection with chlorine because the particles act as shields for the virus and
bacteria. Similarly, suspended solids can protect bacteria from ultraviolet (UV)
sterilization of water. Governments have set standards on the allowable turbidity in
drinking water. In the United States, the allowable standard is 0.3 NTU, with many
drinking water utilities striving to achieve levels as low as 0.1 NTU.
In Jahazpur project area, (ref, Map 10) the turbidity varies from 0 to 10.5 NTU in
different places. Most of the area is having clear water in terms of turbidity while the
villages Baori, Bheempura, Maganpura and some part of Bheelri is having turbidity
more than normal which may be problematic in terms of human drinking.
FLUORIDE CONTAMINATION IN GROUND WATER OF JAHAZPUR PROJECT
AREA:
Water is most useful matter on the earth for all lives. Significance of water as natural
agent is not only determined by its availability on the surface of the earth but also
determined by its physical & chemical properties. High fluoride in drinking water is a
problem found on both the ground & surface of water. Water is universal solvent so it
has the capability to dissolve nearly all natural compounds. The chemical composition
of natural water is developed as the results of many diseases in men. Fluoride is
natural component of the earth crust and also found in many mineral, like fluorite,
fluoroapetite, etc due to high electronegative. Only fluoride form found in water.
Fluoride form sparingly soluble in natural water. It enhances the fluoride
accumulation of high fluoride concentration in soil & water due to this accumulation
of high fluoride concentration lead health problem in livestock. It has been reported
by health organization 5-8 as an essential substance in water for building healthy teeth
at level with in 1 mg/L concentration. The maximum permissible limit of fluoride in
water is 1.5 mg/L by WHO & ICMR. The effects of fluoride in drinking water have
been studied. Fluorosis is a most widespread geochemical disease affecting more than
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
59
66 million people including million children under the age of 14 year. The first
presentation of water quality slandered was made in 1914 by USPHS. The fluoride
concentration laid down by USPHS (1962) WHO (1963) and ICMR (1962). In India
nearly 177 districts in 19 states have been confirmed to be fluoride affected. In
Rajasthan out of 27 districts 16 districts have been confirmed fluoride affected area
and have more than permissible limit concentration of fluoride. In Jahazpur project
area almost 27 samples from different parts of the watershed have been collected and
analyzed with JalTara fluoride testing kit. This is a simple testing method where 50 ml
of sample water has been treated with 2.5 ml of zerkonyl alegarine (acid) and left for a
few hours.
Map 11: Fluoride contamination distribution map in Jahazpur project area.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
60
The color changed due to the reaction between fluoride and the acid has been
observed and the color has been matched with the color matching code. It gives the
value of fluoride <1, 1 to 1.5, 1.5 to 3 and >3. With this kit all the 27 samples have been
analyzed and then the results have been mapped by using GIS with the location of the
sampling collected by the GPS. The following map (Map11) is the distribution of
fluoride contamination of ground water in different parts of Jahazpur project area. In
the map 11, the red colors are the area where fluoride even exceeds the upper
acceptable limit of the fluoride (>2.7 ppm). All the area in the color yellow to red is
not acceptable in terms of drinking purpose. Only few areas like Gandher, Gulabpura,
Teetora Mafi and few part of Taswariya is less affected by Fluoride contamination.
Rest of the part is severely affected with fluoride contamination. Out of 27 assessed
samples, 13 samples have fluoride more than 3 ppm and 3 samples have value more
than 1.5 ppm. Only, 11 samples out of 27 have fluoride contamination less than
1.5ppm which is the maximum permissible limit for drinking water.
Drinking water containing fluoride more than 1.5ppm causes dental fluorosis.
Drinking this water for a period of more than six months may cause skeletal fluorosis
which is an incurable disease. In such a case, the people in the project area are highly
affected with this disease and it has been evidenced from the local people whose teeth
have yellow layer (even the children) and many of them have curved legs.
Safe drinking water is one of the most important concerns for any developed,
developing or under developed country and in any social, economical or ecological
set up without considering the religion, caste or any other issues. Almost 50 percent
of diseases are due to unsafe drinking water contaminated chemically or biologically.
Non contaminated drinking water has emerged as one of the biggest challenges we
face today. In different parts of the world, fluoride and arsenic are the two most
common contaminations which cause different diseases and some fatal disease like
fluorosis which are not curable and very painful for the survivors for a long time.
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
61
In the present context, it has been evident that the drinking water quality in Jahazpur project
area is highly contaminated with fluoride and TDS, salinity are also high in different parts (as
describe in table2). Almost 50% of the assessed well have much more than the normal
fluoride content and people are drinking this water directly or using this for their cooking.
This may cause a health hazard for the people using this water for their domestic purpose
(drinking or cooking). Therefore it is highly recommended that possible solutions to this
problem be sought and people have safe drinking water. Since, it is a problem with the
occurrences of minerals and rocks, no direct process can solve the problem permanently.
However, there are a few possible solutions which are as follows:
1. Providing filter with Nalgonda technique to reduce the fluoride content in
drinking water.
2. Water supply through pipe line from nearby area where fluoride content is less
than 1.5 ppm.
3. Roof rain water harvesting as much as possible in the villages.
4. Campaigning and providing the information to the village community
regarding the contamination and the health hazard caused by this
contamination.
5. Water quality testing in each and every well or hand pumps which are being
used for drinking purpose.
6. Digging of deeper wells with proper casing by considering the depth of non
contaminated deeper confined aquifers after the detail study of the aquifers (as
geologically, there are some layers at deeper depth without presence of
fluoride minerals which do not cause the contamination in ground water at
different depths.)
Post Monsoon Water Table Data:
Sl.no Name of Farmer Village
Water Level (mt)
Elevation (mt) Latitude Longitude
Water Level
1 Sewa, Kamar Raju Taswaria 10.0 359 25.63 75.09 349.00
2 Gopal Taswaria 11.5 358 25.64 75.09 346.50
3 Kisan Teli Taswaria 10.2 359 25.64 75.10 348.80
4 Mohan Reger Taswaria 11.3 359 25.64 75.10 347.70
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
62
5 Dev lal Gujjar Taswaria 11.0 359 25.64 75.10 348.00
6 Mahavir Taswaria 12.0 359 25.64 75.10 347.00
7 Sugna Teli Taswaria 12.5 360 25.64 75.10 347.50
8 Ladu Das Taswaria 12.8 360 25.64 75.09 347.20
9 Gajanand Meena Taswaria 12.3 358 25.64 75.10 345.70
10 Mahavir Taswaria 13.5 359 25.64 75.09 345.50
11 Ramlal ji, Karan ji, Sakto ji Gujjar Taswaria 7.5 362 25.64 75.09 354.50
12 Debi Gujjar Taswaria 5.8 363 25.64 75.09 357.20
13 Jagdish ji, Shivji, Gopal ji, Sitaramji, Madan ji Taswaria 2.1 359 25.64 75.09 356.90
14 Prabhu ji,, Kailash ji Vashnav Taswaria 3.9 361 25.64 75.09 357.10
15 Gopal, Jagdish ji Vaishanav Taswaria 4.5 360 25.64 75.09 355.50
16 Rama Gulabpura 6.4 352 25.64 75.11 345.60
17 Viswaram Gulabpura 10.7 351 25.64 75.11 340.30
18 Gopal Gulabpura 6.4 352 25.65 75.11 345.60
19 Ranglal Gulabpura 5.8 354 25.65 75.11 348.20
20 Common Well Gulabpura 9.6 348 25.64 75.11 338.40
21 Mahavir Bheelri 9.4 351 25.64 75.12 341.60
22 Common Well Bheelri 10.7 353 25.65 75.12 342.30
23 Common Well Bheelri 6.4 352 25.65 75.13 345.60
24 Ladu Bheelri 0.0 351 25.66 75.12 351.00
25 Ramswaroop Bheelri 9.1 354 25.65 75.13 344.90
26 Chagna Teetori 9.4 349 25.67 75.13 339.60
27 Chagna Teetori 15.5 347 25.67 75.14 331.50
28 Rampal Teetori 10.1 350 25.67 75.14 339.90
29 Sarwan Teetori 13.4 353 25.67 75.14 339.60
30 Durga lal Teetoramafi 10.4 345 25.65 75.13 334.60
31 Common Well Teetoramafi 9.1 350 25.69 75.12 340.90
32 Ramswaroop Teetoramafi 8.5 350 25.69 75.13 341.50
33 Narayan Teetoramafi 11.6 350 25.69 75.13 338.40
34 Ratan, Rama, Kailash, Mahavir, Bhawar Bhopalpura 7.0 343 25.65 75.14 336.00
35 Gopal, Sampat Bhopalpura 6.4 339 25.64 75.14 332.60
36 Common Well Bhopalpura 1.5 341 25.64 75.14 339.50
37 Radheshyam Sadhu Bhopalpura 8.2 343 25.64 75.14 334.80
38 Ranmdev Dagaria 7.6 342 25.64 75.15 334.40
39 Baddi Bhopa Gujjar Dagaria 4.5 336 25.63 75.15 331.50
40 Ramkaran, Chandra Dagaria 6.1 338 25.65 75.14 331.90
41 Pappu Ramswaroop Dagaria 8.2 339 25.63 75.14 330.80
42 Common Well Gandher 5.8 343 25.69 75.17 337.20
43 Common Well Gandher 5.5 339 25.69 75.17 333.50
44 Sohan Dhakar Gandher 8.8 331 25.69 75.17 322.20
45 Chand Mal Jain Gandher 2.7 330 25.69 75.17 327.30
46 Ratan Dhakar Gandher 4.1 333 25.68 75.18 328.90
47 Ramlal Maganpura 9.1 335 25.70 75.15 325.90
48 Common Well Maganpura 13.7 339 25.70 75.16 325.30
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
63
49 Harchand Maganpura 10.7 338 25.71 75.16 327.30
50 Sukhlal Maganpura 11.0 347 25.71 75.16 336.00
51 Sonath Maganpura 11.6 346 25.70 75.16 334.40
52 Ramratan Bavdi 19.2 358 25.63 75.09 338.80
53 Banna Bavdi 13.8 357 25.63 75.09 343.30
54 Sonanarayan Bavdi 12.8 357 25.63 75.09 344.20
55 Mohan Bavdi 11.8 358 25.63 75.09 346.20
56 Jagganath Bavdi 11.7 370 25.63 75.09 358.30
57 Ramnarayan Bavdi 12.2 373 25.63 75.09 360.90
58 Bardi Bavdi 10.4 373 25.63 75.08 362.60
59 Narayan Bavdi 10.4 372 25.63 75.08 361.60
60 Rameshwar Bavdi 11.4 359 25.63 75.09 347.70
61 Bheru Gopalpura 7.9 341 25.70 75.15 333.10
62 Common Well Gopalpura 7.8 341 25.70 75.15 333.20
63 Ladu Gopalpura 6.4 340 25.70 75.15 333.60
64 Rameshwar Gopalpura 6.4 345 25.70 75.15 338.60
65 Ramkanya Gopalpura 7.9 347 25.70 75.15 339.10
66 Common Well Gokulpura 12.2 339 25.67 75.17 326.80
67 Japram Gujjar Gokulpura 12.2 339 25.67 75.17 326.80
68 Kalu Gokulpura 11.6 337 25.67 75.18 325.40
69 Nana Gokulpura 7.9 341 25.67 75.17 333.10
70 Chagna Sihana 7.9 341 25.61 75.13 333.10
71 Common Well Sihana 4.3 338 25.61 75.13 333.70
72 Common Well Sihana 10.7 351 25.61 75.13 340.30
73 Common Well Indokia 7.0 344 25.61 75.13 337.00
74 Kisan Teli Indokia 6.7 344 25.61 75.13 337.30
75 Sibaram Indokia 3.7 340 25.61 75.13 336.30
76 Common Well Indokia 8.2 351 25.61 75.11 342.80
77 Common Well Indokia 6.7 349 25.61 75.11 342.30
78 Common Well Indokia 10.1 350 25.61 75.12 339.90
79 Sojiram Indokia 9.1 351 25.61 75.11 341.90
80 Gajraj Bheempura 14.9 339 25.64 75.16 324.10
81 Laduram Bheempura 10.9 351 25.64 75.16 340.10
82 Mewa Gujjar Bheempura 13.0 352 25.65 75.16 339.00
83 Pema Reger Bheempura 10.2 353 25.65 75.16 342.80
84 Ranvir Bheempura 11.9 354 25.64 75.16 342.10
85 Banna Gujjar Jaswantpura 11.8 343 25.64 75.16 331.20
86 Ramnath Jaswantpura 9.1 342 25.64 75.16 332.90
87 Balu Jaswantpura 10.1 344 25.65 75.16 333.90
88 Common Well Jaswantpura 11.6 342 25.65 75.16 330.40
89 Balu Jaswantpura 11.3 342 25.64 75.16 330.70
90 Common Well Pander 2.1 334 25.64 75.19 331.90
91 Common Well Pander 4.0 329 25.64 75.19 325.00
92 Rameshwar Laskar Pander 6.7 329 25.64 75.20 322.30
93 Narayan Kumhar Pander 6.4 332 25.64 75.18 325.60
94 Bajraj Saju Pander 9.4 332 25.64 75.18 322.60
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
64
MOU
Detail Project Report IWMP-II-Jahazpur
PIA-FES: 2011: BHL/Raj
Foundation For Ecological Security (FES)
65
ESTIMATES
Rational:
The IWMP Jahazpur watershed is located in the Jahazpur Tehsil of Bhilwara district. The
project team has done a thorough analysis of the project area based on secondary and
primary data. Some studies have also been undertaken to understand the geo-hydrology
and ecology of the area. Efforts have been to map the community needs to help the
communities in planning interventions in the villages.
The secondary data and the topographical survey of the area suggest that the overall
topography of the watershed area is flat with the majority of the area having a slope of
0-1%. The total geographical area of the watershed is 7191 Ha of which 63% area is
under agriculture. But the agriculture is largely rainfed with only 5.4 % under irrigation.
The farmers depend mainly on the open wells for irrigation. The secondary data suggest
that only 37.6 % of the people fall under the literate category. The total numbers of
household in the region are 2969 with a total population of 11905. The Schedule caste
and Schedule tribes form a significant portion of the overall population with 33%
belonging to these categories.
The ground water of the area has a high fluoride contamination with almost 50% of the
wells have fluoride contamination. This is hazardous for human health as well as health
of the livestock. The total livestock population is around 18276 which have a large
population of cows which is nearly 34%of the total population while the small
ruminants constitute 51% of the total livestock population.
The household survey helped in developing a better understanding of the villages and
helped in preparing plans for the area. The survey could through light on some of the
finer aspects of village life in the region. Looking at the overall income follows of the
area nearly 17% income comes form animal husbandry sector while the most prominent
is the agriculture which occupies nearly 28% of the total income. The total contribution
of wage employment in terms of MGNREGA, Wage employment in other place and
migration, total to around 32 % which indicate that the agriculture though being
significant in terms of the geographical spread does not account in a proportionate
manner when it comes of income. Nearly 25% of the households in the area are land less,
while 66% of the household come under the small, medium and marginal category. Only
9% of the farmers are large farmers. One of the most characteristic features of the area is
33.4% of the household are below poverty line. Nearly 53% of the Household under the
scheduled caste and tribe category are below poverty line. 18% of the households are
forced to migrate in search of better income generation opportunities.
During the survey and village meeting the kind of needs expressed by the village
communities are as follows:
Capacity building needs: Capacity building needs is generated in consonance
with the kind of occupation the people of the area have. Largely demands have
been to build the capacities under agriculture, AH, Dairying, Poultry farming,
Land development. However some of the people have also demanded for off
farm livelihood training such as Computer literacy, driving, electrical works,
midwifery training, mobile repair stitching and kasida kari.
I) Programmatic Interventions:
To supplement the above, it was found that Awareness building programs,
Institutional strengthening trainings, Exposure visits will be the tools to
capacitate and sensitize the community on various programs and policies,
strengthen the
Land based physical intervention: a large percentage of the people nearly 2501
households have come up with demands for farm bunds and farm ponds. People
have demanded for well deepening and new wells both for drinking water as
well as irrigation. In addition there are demands for soil and water conservation
activities on commons lands.
Agriculture and Agro culture based intervention: People in the area have
expressed there interest in improving the agro culture of the area with advance
agronomic practices. There have been cases where people have demanded for
new varieties being introduced in the area by means of crop demonstration. The
area has a scarcity of water thereby making people realize the importance of
water. People have demanded for support in improving the water transport and
irrigation systems in the villages by usage of pipes and water efficiency devises.
Livestock which is also significant for the area in terms of livelihood support has
also been a focus of the people who have demanded for breed improvement,
fodder improvement, AI, livestock insurance.
Savings also have gained importance in the area where people around 1000
household demanding for SHGs.
Based on these ground data following issues have been identified as key intervention
area for the region. These are:
Land development including farm lands.
Water harvesting to enhance availability for water.
Livelihood enhancement.
Skill enhancement.
Land development:
Arable lands: As part of the arable land treatment work activities such as farm bund
and farm pond have been planned for the in-into conservation of water. These would
enhance the soil moisture in the farm lands and will support critical irrigation during
situation of failure in monsoon during critical growth periods. In addition neem
plantation is being promoted in the farm lands to augment the fodder needs of the area
as well as enhancing the biomass availability in the region.
Common land: Pasture lands will be developed to enhance the availability of fodder for
the large livestock population of the area. This would also mean talking up plantations
of fodder trees on these pastures which would also suffice to the needs of the small
ruminants which is nearly 50% of the livestock population. Efforts would be undertaken
for the in-situ conservation of soil in the village commons by digging of contour
trenches.
Water Harvesting: The area is having acute water scarcity as well has 50% if it water
sources being contaminated with fluoride. Therefore there is an urgent need to harvest
water above ground and facilitate recharge of shallow wells to solve the problem of
drinking and irrigation water. For this a large proportion of the budget has been kept for
the purpose of creation of masonry dams and earthen water harvesting structures.
Provision has also been made to prevent siltation of these structures by construction of
loose boulder check dams on the drainages leading to these structures.
Production Enhancement and Livelihood activities for Asset less person: The
livelihood enhancement program is directed towards farm based intervention. Efforts on
one hand are to reduce the cost of intervention for farmers, improve the productivity
and increase the income both by market linkages and improved usage of byproducts. In
this are efforts would be made by promoting low external inputs based conservation
agriculture, promoting the concept of seed bank both for conservation of traditional
seeds as well as reduce market dependence for seed. To enhance the soil nutrition
attempts will be made to demonstrate the concepts of BD compositing and Pit
composing. These are all attempts to promote on farm production of quality manure so
that the agriculture shifts form inorganic to organic agriculture.
There was a demand for diversifying agriculture by promoting dry land horticulture.
Efforts will be made to promote Anar cultivation on 10 ha of land. These plantations
will be supported by water efficiency measures such as drip with horticulture. The area
also reflects physical deficiencies which are also subject to poor drinking water and lack
of nutrition. Therefore 55 kitchen gardens are being promoted for increasing the intake
of green leafy vegetable in the regular diet of the people.
To promote market linkages SHGs, Water user association and federation will be
capacitated to take up activities such agri-business. Activity such as vermin-composting
as a livelihood option for poor livestock keepers will be promoted. As a departure from
the normal thinking of Biogas as a energy saving device the project also uses this as an
option to add value to the cow dung by generating valuable energy, improved manure
and also would contribute towards reducing methane emissions.
To support the livestock based livelihoods there has been a demand for breed
improvement. The project plans to work on these aspects on three fonts:
Improving the herd by providing improved breeds of cows, buffalos and goats.
By Artificial insemination.
By providing natural service bull/bison/buck.
In addition the project will be promoting integrated livestock and dairy based
enterprises with people who have shown a strong inclination towards livestock
management. During meetings and surveys people explained the way they feed the
animals’ especially feeding of maize Stover’s. This is a very unscientific way where a lot
of feed is wasted and many a times the animal is also injured. Therefore electric chaff
cutters will be promoted to improve the fodder efficiencies as well will be an income
generating activity for the SHGs.
To promote energy conservation pressure cookers and solar light have been proposed as
demonstration. These will be given across different caste and class groups to facilitate in
scaling up of these initiatives.
Skill enhancement: The skill enhancement proposed is based on the needs to enhance
the income levels in different groups to support the households. These groups are:
Women and differentially abled group: activities such as tailoring and Kasida kari.
People have expressed needs to learn tailoring and Kasida kari as an activity that they
can pursue during their free period and can earn some money to support their financial
needs. The facilities for such training are also available in Bhilwara.
Skill enhancement of para workers: The project aims at building a cadre of technically
abled people in the field of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Soil and moisture
conservation activities, energy conservation, accounts. This is largely to address issues of
project implementation as well as post project sustainability issues.
Off farm skill building: People have expressed need for technical capability in the area
of hardware maintenance in case of mobile. This also is a good income generating skill
as mobile technology has become very popular in the villages. There are agencies that
are providing quality training ion this filed which have been contacted for providing
these training in the area. The number of people has been proposed based on average
two persons per village. Trainings to people for repair and maintenance of electrical
appliances has also been proposed. 7 flour mills have been proposed for remote villages
as the bigger villages have existing flour mills.
Panchayat Villages Area BudgetBaori Taswariya 707 8484000
Baori 791 9492000Total 1498 17976000
Titori Titori 991 11892000Dhagariya 369 4428000Bheelari 404 4848000Gulabpura 168Total 1932 23184000
Phalasiya Indokiya 188 2256000Sihana 106 1272000Total 294 3528000
Pandher Gokulpura 144 1728000Jaswantpura 64 768000Pander 120 1440000Total 328 3936000
Gandher Bhimpura 187 2244000Maganpura 645 7740000Gandher 1435 17220000Titoda Mafi 872 10464000Total 3139 37668000
Grand Total 7191 86292000
Village Wise & Panchayat Budget IWMP-II Jahazpur Watershed
Sl.No Micro No Name of Village
Area (ha) Total Area
1 1/1Gandher Bhimpura 187Gandher Maganpura 645Gandher Gandher 1435Gandher Titoda Mafi 872Titori Teetori 651Pander Gokulpura 144Pander Jaswantpura 64
2 3/4Pander Pander 120Titori Dhagariya 182
3 3/5Titori Dhagariya 60Titori Bheelari 220Titori Teetori 340Titori Gulabpura
4 3/6Baori Taswariya 707Titori Bheelari 452Titori Dhagariya 27Phalasiya Indokiya 188Phalasiya Sihana 106
5 3/8 Baori Baori 791 791Total 7191 7191
IWMP-II JAHAZPUR
3998
302
620
1480
Sl.No Village Area (ha)
Total Amount [Rs]
EPA Amount [Rs]
1 Bhimpura 187 2244000 897602 Maganpura 645 7740000 3096003 Gandher 1435 17220000 6888004 Titoda Mafi 872 10464000 4185605 Teetori 991 11892000 4756806 Gokulpura 144 1728000 691207 Jaswantpura 64 768000 307208 Pander 120 1440000 576009 Dhagariya 369 4428000 17712010 Bheelari 404 4848000 19392011 Taswariya 707 8484000 33936012 Indokiya 188 2256000 9024013 Sihana 106 1272000 5088014 Baori 791 9492000 37968015 Gulabpura 168 2016000 80640
Total 7191 86292000 3451680
Village Wise Budget & EPA detailsIWMP-II Jahazpur Watershed
Land_Detail_of_Jahazpur_revised
Sl.No. Villages
Total Geographic
al Area
Total Watershed
Area Irrigated UnirrigatedPasture
Land
Billanam Nakabil
KastBillanam
Kabil Kast Forest
Percentage(%) wise
bifurcation1 Gulabpura 356 168 7 87 2 42 30 0 472 Dagariya 399 369 32 203 36 55 43 0 923 Teetori 1123 991 38 639 99 80 135 0 884 Bheelri 404 404 15 175 35 107 72 0 1005 Taswariya 959 707 21 395 56 88 147 0 746 Baori 1335 791 39 414 81 139 118 0 597 Sihana 648 106 3 45 6 16 35 0 168 Indokiya 837 188 5 96 15 52 20 0 229 Gandher 1435 1435 50 886 105 218 176 0 100
10 Teetoramafi 870 872 10 563 119 88 92 0 10011 Maganpura 645 645 17 436 75 58 59 0 10012 Bheempura 187 187 3 136 16 13 19 0 10013 Pander 2611 120 4 60 18 24 14 0 514 Jaswantpura 293 64 1 48 6 6 2 0 2215 Gokulpura 400 144 1 122 9 6 6 0 36
Total 12502 7191 247 4305 679 993 968 0 58
Land detail of Jahazpur Project Area in ha
Foundation For Ecological SecuirtyF-33 Subhash Nagar(Extension East),Bhilwara-311001
Page 1
Sl.No. ITEM DETAILS1 Name of watershed IWMP-II2 Name of panchayat samiti Jahajpur3 Macro No 1 & 34 Micro No 1/1,3/4,3/5,3/6,3/85 Topographical area , Ha 71916 Area not available for treatment,pal, habitition,rasta etc 0
7 Effective area 71918 Average annual rainfall, mm 3509 From strange table proposition of estimated runoff by
given rainfall% of runoff to rainfall
i In good catchment 8.3ii In average catchment 6.2iii In bad catchment 4.1
Type of watershed Area of watershed, Ha
Factor in cum per ha
Expected yield, cum
Good 791 290.0 229390.0Average 3596 217.0 780332.0
Bad 2804 143.5 402374.0Gross Total water runoff in the watershed 1412096.0
Less 40% Water evaporation loss 564838.4Net water collection for watershed 847257.6
10
Sl.No. Name of structure No / Area Storage capacity in cum
Total storage, in cum
a Big structure 6 30000.0 180000.0b Small structure 7 9600.0 67200.0c Local depressions Considering 11% of
total expected yield155330.6 155330.6
Storage of water by existing structures 402530.611 Balance runoff = Expected yield - Present storage in
cum444727.04
12 Considering as per norms 75% of balance amount 333545.2813 Cosidering Average land slope,PRA
exercise,Recconaciance survey,GT sheet etc,The following proposed new measures
Sl.No. Type of structure / Measures No / Area Storage capacity per unit
Total Storage capacity in cum
Arable LandFarm Bunding 1045.5 90.0 94095.0Farm Pond (Puccka) 31 400.0 12400.0Land Development and RegenerationP. D. on Private Land 184.6 90.0 16614.0P.D. on Common Land 340 138.5 47106.9Open contour Trench 118 60.8 7168.5Earthen Dugout Pond 21 400.0 8400.0New Nadi 19 3300.0 62700.0Drainage Line TreatmentR.R Stone Masonary Structure 5 5184.0 25920.0Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir 15 4900.0 73500.0Planned storage of water by watershed interventions 347904.4
Conservation plannned for 3, 47,904 Cum water
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar, Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Water Budgeting of the watershed Area
Total water runoff in the watershedTable -1
Present storage of water by existing runoff structureTable - 2
Table - 3
Total Area 7191 HaTotal Sanction Amount 862.92 Lack
Sl.No. Budget component % of the Budget Units No/Ha Quantity Rate in Rs Budget in
LakhsUnits Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget
0 2 20 21 20 20 170 0.9122514 7.814801836 8.179702406 7.87181755 7.87181755 6.7096092 39.36
1 Administrative costs 10 86.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.00 12.94 0.00 27.61 0.00 24.16 0.00 8.63 0.00 8.63 0 86.292 Monitoring 1 8.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.73 0.00 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.45 0.00 0.00 0 8.633 Evaluation 1 8.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.02 0.00 3.02 0.00 0.00 0 8.63
Sub-total (1+2+3) 103.55 0 0.00 0 4.31 0 17.26 0 31.07 0 27.18 0 15.10 0 8.63 0 103.554 Entry Point activity 4 34.52 0 0 0 10.24 0 24.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.51
Total [4] 34.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.24 0.00 24.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.515 Detailed project Report 1 8.63 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.63
Total [5] 8.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.95 0.00 1.30 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.636 Institution and Capacity building 5 43.15
0.86 8.63 9.06 8.63 8.63 7.33 43.15a Awareness Programme No 58.00 0.08 4.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 1.13 16.00 1.28 18.00 1.44 10.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 58 4.65b Institutrional building No 39.00 0.20 7.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.00 9.00 1.80 9.00 1.80 11.00 2.20 0.00 0.00 39 7.80c Exposure visit [External] No 22.00 0.35 7.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.40 6.00 2.10 5.00 1.75 7.00 2.45 0.00 0.00 22 7.70d Exposure visit [local] No 26.00 0.15 3.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.05 5.00 0.75 8.00 1.20 6.00 0.90 0.00 0.00 26 3.90e Field training No 28.00 0.10 2.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.70 6.00 0.60 7.00 0.70 8.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 28 2.80f Padyatra/ Campaign No 5.00 0.75 3.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.75 2.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 5 3.75g Vaternary and Health Camp No 26.00 0.25 6.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.23 8.00 1.96 7.00 1.72 6.00 1.47 0.00 0.00 26 6.37h SHG Capacity building No 25.00 0.08 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.32 7.00 0.56 8.00 0.64 6.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 25 2.00i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 28.00 0.08 2.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.32 8.00 0.64 8.00 0.64 8.00 0.64 0.00 0.00 28 2.24j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 24.00 0.08 1.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.48 6.00 0.48 5.00 0.40 7.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 24 1.92
Total [6] 281 43.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.00 8.63 73.00 11.67 76.00 11.04 71.00 11.80 0.00 0.00 281.00 43.13
Sub-Total (4+5+6) 86.28 0 0.00 0 17.19 61 34.20 73 12.05 76 11.04 71 11.80 281 86.27
7 Watershed development works 60 517.757.a Arable Land 7.18 0.14 1.44 1.51 1.44 1.44 1.22 7.18a Farm Bunding Ha 1045.50 0.13 139.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122.00 16.23 255.00 33.92 215.38 28.65 238.00 31.65 215.12 28.61 1046 139.05b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 7.00 1.34 9.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.34 3.00 4.03 2.00 2.68 1.00 1.34 0.00 0.00 7 9.39c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 24.00 0.73 17.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.92 7.00 5.10 5.00 3.65 6.00 4.37 2.00 1.46 24 17.50d Regeneration No 782.00 0.02 15.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 3.90 195.00 3.90 196.00 3.92 149.00 2.99 47.00 0.94 782 15.65
Total (7.a) 181.59 0 0.00 0 0.00 322 24.38 460 46.94 418 38.89 394 40.36 264 31.01 1859 181.59
7.b Land Development and Regeneration 9.83
0.20 1.97 2.06 1.97 1.97 1.67 9.83a P. D. on Private Land Ha 184.60 0.097 17.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.60 3.26 44.00 4.27 39.00 3.88 36.00 3.49 31.00 3.01 184 17.91b P.D. on Common Land Ha 340.00 0.43 144.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.00 39.62 77.00 32.80 88.00 37.49 52.00 22.15 30.00 12.78 340 144.84c Open contour Trench Ha 118.00 0.07 8.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.00 2.73 20.00 1.40 18.00 1.26 19.00 1.33 22.00 1.54 118 8.26d Earthen Dugout Pond No 21.00 0.62 13.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.50 7.00 4.37 5.00 3.12 4.00 2.50 1.00 0.62 21 13.10e New Nadi No 19.00 1.67 31.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 6.68 3.00 5.01 4.00 6.68 7.00 11.69 1.00 1.67 19 31.73f Repair of Nadi No 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 3.00 8.00 12.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.13 2.00 7.41 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.80 4 12.34
Total (7.b) 0 228.18 0 0.00 0 0.00 174 54.78 152 50.98 156 59.83 118 41.16 86 21.42 686 228.187.c Drainage Line Treatment 6.61
0.13 1.32 1.39 1.32 1.32 1.12 6.61a LBCD No 337.50 0.056 18.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.00 3.98 96.00 5.38 75.50 4.23 95.00 5.32 0.00 0.00 338 18.90b Gabions No 19.00 0.492 9.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.97 7.00 3.44 5.00 2.46 3.00 1.48 0.00 0.00 19 9.35c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 5.00 10.674 22.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.50 1.00 3.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 15.52 5 22.60
d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 15.00 3.809 57.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 11.43 3.00 11.43 2.00 7.62 3.00 11.43 4.00 15.24 15 57.14
Total (7.c) 0 107.99 0 0.00 0 0.00 79 20.87 107 23.83 83 14.31 101 18.22 7 30.76 377 107.98
Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 517.76 0 0.00 0 0.00 575 100.04 719 121.75 657 113.03 613 99.74 357.12 83.19 2921 517.75
8 Production Enhancement & Livelihood activities for the asset less persons 15 129.44
8.a Women / differentially abled centered micro enterprise 0.18
0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.18
a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 57.00 0.09 5.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.72 15.00 1.35 10.00 0.90 10.00 0.90 14.00 1.26 57 5.13
Total [8.a] 57 5.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.72 15.00 1.35 10.00 0.90 10.00 0.90 14.00 1.26 57.00 5.138.b Livestock & Dairy management 25.89
0.52 5.18 5.44 5.18 5.18 4.40 25.89a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 30.00 0.325 9.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.98 8.00 2.60 8.00 2.60 4.00 1.30 7.00 2.28 30 9.75b Goat Rearing No 125.00 0.064 7.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.95 32.00 2.03 24.00 1.52 30.00 1.91 24.00 1.52 125 7.94c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 56.00 0.025 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.18 18.00 0.45 12.00 0.30 13.00 0.33 6.00 0.15 56 1.40d Breed Improvement [AI] No 887.00 0.00150 1.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.00 0.15 181.00 0.27 183.00 0.27 220.00 0.33 205.00 0.31 887 1.33
e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 8.00 0.30 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.30 3.00 0.90 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.30 2.00 0.60 8 2.40
WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Total
f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 9.00 0.25 2.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.25 3.00 0.75 1.00 0.25 3.00 0.75 1.00 0.25 9 2.25
g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 9.00 0.11 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.11 3.00 0.33 3.00 0.33 1.00 0.11 9 0.99
Total [8.b] 1124 26.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 126.00 2.91 246.00 7.11 232.00 5.58 274.00 5.24 246.00 5.22 1124.00 26.068.c Energy conservation 11.65
0.23 2.33 2.45 2.33 2.33 1.98 11.65a Bio-gas No 40.00 0.21 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.05 10.00 2.05 8.00 1.64 9.00 1.85 3.00 0.62 40 8.20b Pressure cookers No 116.50 0.02 2.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.41 21.50 0.37 29.00 0.50 23.00 0.40 19.00 0.33 117 2.01c Energy efficient light No 80.00 0.02 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.00 0.31 12.00 0.22 22.00 0.40 15.00 0.27 14.00 0.25 80 1.44
Total [8.c] 237 11.65 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 51 2.77 44 2.64 59 2.54 47 2.51 36 1.19 237 11.65
8.d Skill enhancement of Para workers/ individuals on agreed sectors 0.56
0.01 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.56
a Skill development of Para-workers per training cost
159.00 0.08 12.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 2.24 33.00 2.64 34.00 2.72 32.00 2.56 32.00 2.56 159 12.72Total [8.d] 159 12.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 2.24 33.00 2.64 34.00 2.72 32.00 2.56 32.00 2.56 159.00 12.72
8.e Agriculture 1.190.02 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.20 1.19
a Low External Input for Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA)
Ha 180.00 0.04 6.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.00 1.67 46.00 1.67 43.00 1.57 42.00 1.53 3.00 0.11 180 6.55b Fodder Demo Ha 12.00 0.37 4.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.10 3.00 1.10 4.00 1.46 2.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 12 4.39c Grain / Seed Bank No 5.00 0.70 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.70 2.00 1.41 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 5 3.52d BD Composting No 61.00 0.01 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.20 12.00 0.17 18.00 0.26 14.00 0.20 3.00 0.04 61 0.87e Pit Composting No 72.00 0.01 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.00 0.16 8.00 0.08 24.00 0.24 13.00 0.13 11.00 0.11 72 0.72f Integrated Farm Model No 5.00 1.74 8.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.74 3.00 5.23 1.00 1.74 0.00 0.00 5 8.72
Total [8.e] 330 24.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 3.84 72.00 6.18 93.00 9.46 73.00 5.04 17.00 0.26 335.00 24.788.f Horticulture 0.44
0.01 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.44a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 10.00 0.64 6.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.28 4.00 2.56 3.00 1.92 1.00 0.64 10 6.40b Kitchen garden No 57.00 0.05 2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.33 12.00 0.57 15.00 0.71 15.00 0.71 8.00 0.38 57 2.71
Total [8.f] 67 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.33 14.00 1.85 19.00 3.27 18.00 2.63 9.00 1.02 67 9.118.g Efficient Irrigation 5.18
0.10 1.04 1.09 1.04 1.04 0.88 5.18a Pipe line Irrigation No 43.00 0.12 5.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.20 7.00 0.84 8.00 0.96 11.00 1.32 6.00 0.72 42 5.04
Total [8.g] 43 5.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.20 7.00 0.84 8.00 0.96 11.00 1.32 6.00 0.72 42.00 5.048.h Agriculture based micro enterprise 19.42
0.39 3.88 4.08 3.88 3.88 3.30 19.42
a Provision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs etc (lumpsum) No 16.00 0.50 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 4.00 8.00 4.00 16 8.00
b Vermi composting 26.00 0.29 7.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.14 5.00 1.43 7.00 2.00 6.00 1.72 4.00 1.14 26 7.44c Electric Multipurpose thresher 20.50 0.10 4.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.60 6.00 1.20 5.00 1.00 3.50 0.70 3.00 0.60 21 4.10
Total [8.h] 16 19.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.74 11.00 2.63 12.00 3.00 17.50 6.42 15.00 5.74 62.50 19.548.i Livestock & Dairy based enterprise 0.30
0.01 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.30
a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 17.00 0.33 5.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.33 2.00 0.65 4.00 1.30 5.00 1.63 5.00 1.63 17 5.53
b Chaff Cutter 22.00 0.08 2.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.40 4.00 0.40 4.00 0.40 6.00 0.60 4.00 0.40 22 2.20Total [8.i] 17 7.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.73 6.00 1.05 8.00 1.70 11.00 2.23 9.00 2.03 39.00 7.73
8.j Non farm micro enterprise 0.390.01 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.39
a Mobile repairing per candidate cost 32.00 0.09 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.82 19.00 1.72 4.00 0.36 32 2.90
b Domestic Electric and based appliances repair training
per candidate cost 30.00 0.09 2.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 16.00 1.45 13.00 1.18 30 2.72
c Flour Mill 7.00 0.30 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.20 3.00 0.90 7 2.10Total [8.j] 69 7.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.91 39.00 4.38 20.00 2.44 69.00 7.72
Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 129.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 322.00 16.48 447.50 26.29 485.00 31.04 532.50 33.22 404.00 22.44 2191.00 129.47
9 Consolidation phase 3 25.890.52 5.18 5.44 5.18 5.18 4.40 25.89
a Capacity Enhancement for post project management 0.00 8.29 25.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.89 0 25.89
b Impact documentation 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00c Scalling up operation 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00d Monitoring and Evaluation 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00e Photography 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Sub-Total (9) 25.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.89 0.00 25.89Grand Total 100 863.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.50 957.60 167.97 1239.50 191.15 1217.88 182.29 1216.50 159.86 761.12 140.15 5392.60 862.93
Total Area 3139 HaTotal Sanction Amount 376.68 Lack
Sl.No. Budget component % of the Budget Units No/Ha Quantity Rate in Rs Budget in
LakhsUnits Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget
0 2 20 21 20 20 170 8.7303574 74.78860659 78.2807495 75.33425393 75.33425393 64.211779 376.68
1 Administrative costs 10 37.67 0.00 1.88 5.65 12.05 10.547 3.77 3.77 0 37.672 Monitoring 1 3.77 0.00 0.75 1.51 1.51 0 3.773 Evaluation 1 3.77 0.00 1.13 1.318 1.32 0 3.77
Sub-total (1+2+3) 45.20 0 0.00 0 1.88 0 7.53 0 13.56 0 11.87 0 6.59 0 3.77 0 45.204 Entry Point activity 4 15.07 3.91 11.16 0 15.07
Total [4] 15.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.91 0.00 11.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15.075 Detailed project Report 1 3.77 3.77 0 3.77
Total [5] 3.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3.776 Institution and Capacity building 5 18.83
0.38 3.77 3.96 3.77 3.77 3.20 18.83a Awareness Programme No 31 0.08 2.48 0.00 0.00 8 0.64 8 0.64 11 0.88 4 0.32 0.00 31 2.48b Institutrional building No 20 0.20 4.00 0.00 0.00 5 1.00 5 1.00 5 1.00 5 1.00 0.00 20 4.00c Exposure visit [External] No 10 0.35 3.50 0.00 0.00 2 0.70 3 1.05 2 0.70 3 1.05 0.00 10 3.50d Exposure visit [local] No 10 0.15 1.50 0.00 0.00 3 0.45 2 0.30 3 0.45 2 0.30 0.00 10 1.50e Field training No 10 0.10 1.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.20 3 0.30 2 0.20 3 0.30 0.00 10 1.00f Padyatra/ Campaign No 2 0.75 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.75 0.00 1 0.75 0.00 2 1.50g Vaternary and Health Camp No 10 0.25 2.45 0.00 0.00 3 0.74 2 0.49 3 0.74 2 0.49 0.00 10 2.45h SHG Capacity building No 10 0.08 0.80 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 3 0.24 2 0.16 3 0.24 0.00 10 0.80i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 10 0.08 0.80 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 3 0.24 3 0.24 2 0.16 0.00 10 0.80j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 10 0.08 0.80 0.00 0.00 3 0.24 2 0.16 2 0.16 3 0.24 0.00 10 0.80
Total [6] 123 18.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 4.29 32.00 5.17 33.00 4.53 28.00 4.85 0.00 0.00 123.00 18.83
Sub-Total (4+5+6) 37.66 0 0.00 0 7.68 30 15.45 32 5.17 33 4.53 28 4.85 0.00 0.00 123 37.67
7 Watershed development works 60 226.017.a Arable Land 84.44 1.69 16.89 17.73 16.89 16.89 14.35 84.44a Farm Bunding Ha 498 0.13 66.23 0.00 0.00 44 5.85 121 16.09 95 12.64 122 16.23 116 15.43 498 66.23b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 2 1.34 2.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.34 0.00 1 1.34 0.00 2 2.68c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 13 0.73 9.48 0.00 0.00 3 2.19 3 2.19 2 1.46 3 2.19 2 1.46 13 9.48d Regeneration No 302 0.02 6.04 0.00 0.00 76 1.52 75 1.50 76 1.52 52 1.04 23 0.46 302 6.04
Total (7.a) 84.44 0 0.00 0 0.00 123 9.56 200 21.12 173 15.61 178 20.80 141 17.35 815 84.44
7.b Land Development and Regeneration 115.95
2.32 23.19 24.35 23.19 23.19 19.71 115.95a P. D. on Private Land Ha 50 0.097 4.85 0.00 0.00 13 1.26 13 1.26 12 1.16 6 0.58 6 0.58 50 4.85b P.D. on Common Land Ha 200 0.43 85.20 0.00 0.00 50 21.30 50 21.30 50 21.30 25 10.65 25 10.65 200 85.20c Open contour Trench Ha 20 0.07 1.40 0.00 0.00 5 0.35 5 0.35 3 0.21 5 0.35 2 0.14 20 1.40d Earthen Dugout Pond No 8 0.62 4.99 0.00 0.00 2 1.25 2 1.25 1 0.62 2 1.25 1 0.62 8 4.99e New Nadi No 8 1.67 13.36 0.00 0.00 2 3.34 1 1.67 2 3.34 2 3.34 1 1.67 8 13.36f Repair of Nadi No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 1 6.14 6.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 4.34 0.00 1 1.80 2 6.14
Total (7.b) 0 115.95 0 0.00 0 0.00 72 27.50 71 25.83 69 30.98 40 16.17 36 15.47 288 115.947.c Drainage Line Treatment 25.63
0.51 5.13 5.38 5.13 5.13 4.36 25.63a LBCD No 100 0.056 5.60 0.00 0.00 25 1.40 25 1.40 25 1.40 25 1.40 0.00 100 5.60b Gabions No 2 0.492 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.49 1 0.49 0.00 0.00 2 0.98c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 5 3.809 19.05 0.00 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81 1 3.81 1 3.81 1 3.81 5 19.05
Total (7.c) 0 25.63 0 0.00 0 0.00 26 5.21 27 5.70 27 5.70 26 5.21 1 3.81 107 25.63
Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 226.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 221 42.27 298 52.65 269 52.29 244 42.17 178.00 36.62 1210 226.01
8 Production Enhancement & Livelihood activities for the asset less persons 15 56.50
8.a Women / differentially abled centered micro enterprise 2.25
0.05 0.45 0.47 0.45 0.45 0.38 2.25
a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 25 0.09 2.25 0.00 0.00 5 0.45 5 0.45 5 0.45 5 0.45 5 0.45 25 2.25
Total [8.a] 25 2.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.45 5.00 0.45 5.00 0.45 5.00 0.45 5.00 0.45 25.00 2.25
Total
WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PANCHAYAT-GANDHER, TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
8.b Livestock & Dairy management 11.300.23 2.26 2.37 2.26 2.26 1.92 11.30
a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 12 0.325 3.90 0.00 0.00 3 0.98 3 0.98 2 0.65 2 0.65 2 0.65 12 3.90b Goat Rearing No 60 0.064 3.81 0.00 0.00 15 0.95 15 0.95 7 0.44 15 0.95 8 0.51 60 3.81c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 20 0.025 0.50 0.00 0.00 5 0.13 5 0.13 2 0.05 5 0.13 3 0.08 20 0.50d Breed Improvement [AI] No 300 0.00150 0.45 0.00 0.00 75 0.11 75 0.11 37 0.06 75 0.11 38 0.06 300 0.45
e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 4 0.30 1.20 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 1 0.30 0.00 1 0.30 1 0.30 4 1.20
f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 4 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 4 1.00
g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 4 0.11 0.44 0.00 0.00 1 0.11 1 0.11 1 0.11 1 0.11 0.00 4 0.44
Total [8.b] 404 11.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101.00 2.83 101.00 2.83 49.00 1.31 100.00 2.50 53.00 1.84 404.00 11.308.c Energy conservation 5.09
0.10 1.02 1.07 1.02 1.02 0.86 5.09a Bio-gas No 18 0.21 3.69 0.00 0.00 4 0.82 5 1.03 4 0.82 3 0.62 2 0.41 18 3.69b Pressure cookers No 50 0.02 0.86 0.00 0.00 12 0.21 13 0.22 12 0.21 7 0.12 6 0.10 50 0.86c Energy efficient light No 30 0.02 0.54 0.00 0.00 8 0.14 7 0.13 9 0.16 3 0.05 3 0.05 30 0.54
Total [8.c] 98 5.09 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 24 1.17 25 1.38 25 1.19 13 0.79 11 0.57 98 5.09
8.d Skill enhancement of Para workers/ individuals on agreed sectors 5.60
0.11 1.12 1.18 1.12 1.12 0.95 5.60
a Skill development of Para-workers per training cost
70 0.08 5.60 0.00 0.00 14 1.12 14 1.12 14 1.12 14 1.12 14 1.12 70 5.60Total [8.d] 70 5.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 1.12 14.00 1.12 14.00 1.12 14.00 1.12 14.00 1.12 70.00 5.60
8.e Agriculture 10.830.22 2.17 2.27 2.17 2.17 1.84 10.83
a Low External Input for Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA)
Ha 36 0.04 1.31 0.00 0.00 9 0.33 9 0.33 10 0.36 8 0.29 0.00 36 1.31b Fodder Demo Ha 4 0.37 1.46 0.00 0.00 1 0.37 1 0.37 1 0.37 1 0.37 0.00 4 1.46c Grain / Seed Bank No 3 0.70 2.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.70 1 0.70 0.00 3 2.11d BD Composting No 27 0.01 0.38 0.00 0.00 7 0.10 7 0.10 7 0.10 6 0.09 0.00 27 0.38e Pit Composting No 32 0.01 0.32 0.00 0.00 6 0.06 7 0.07 7 0.07 7 0.07 5 0.05 32 0.32f Integrated Farm Model No 3 1.74 5.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.74 1 1.74 1 1.74 0.00 3 5.23
Total [8.e] 102 10.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.00 0.85 26.00 3.31 27.00 3.35 24.00 3.26 5.00 0.05 105.00 10.838.f Horticulture 3.96
0.08 0.79 0.83 0.79 0.79 0.67 3.96a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 5 0.64 3.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.64 2 1.28 1 0.64 1 0.64 5 3.20b Kitchen garden No 16 0.05 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 0.19 4 0.19 4 0.19 4 0.19 16 0.76
Total [8.f] 21 3.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.83 6.00 1.47 5.00 0.83 5.00 0.83 21 3.968.g Efficient Irrigation 2.16
0.04 0.43 0.45 0.43 0.43 0.37 2.16a Pipe line Irrigation No 18 0.12 2.16 0.00 0.00 3 0.36 3 0.36 4 0.48 5 0.60 3 0.36 18 2.16
Total [8.g] 18 2.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.36 3.00 0.36 4.00 0.48 5.00 0.60 3.00 0.36 18.00 2.168.h Agriculture based micro enterprise 8.56
0.17 1.71 1.80 1.71 1.71 1.46 8.56
aProvision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs etc (lumpsum)
No 8 0.50 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 1.50 5 2.50 8 4.00
b Vermi composting 10 0.29 2.86 0.00 0.00 2 0.57 2 0.57 1 0.29 2 0.57 3 0.86 10 2.86c Electric Multipurpose thresher 9 0.20 1.70 0.00 0.00 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.30 1 0.20 9 1.70
Total [8.h] 8 8.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.97 4.00 0.97 3.00 0.69 6.50 2.37 9.00 3.56 26.50 8.568.i Livestock & Dairy based enterprise 3.35
0.07 0.67 0.70 0.67 0.67 0.57 3.35
a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 8 0.33 2.60 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.33 2 0.65 2 0.65 3 0.98 8 2.60
b Chaff Cutter 8 0.10 0.80 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.10 1 0.10 2 0.20 2 0.20 2 0.20 8 0.80Total [8.i] 16 3.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.10 2.00 0.43 4.00 0.85 4.00 0.85 5.00 1.18 16.00 3.40
8.j Non farm micro enterprise 3.350.07 0.67 0.70 0.67 0.67 0.57 3.35
a Mobile repairing per candidate cost 14 0.09 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 0.91 4 0.36 14 1.27
b Domestic Electric and based appliances repair training
per candidate cost 13 0.09 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0.73 5 0.45 13 1.18
c Flour Mill 3 0.30 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.60 1 0.30 3 0.90Total [8.j] 30 3.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 2.23 10.00 1.12 30.00 3.35
Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 56.50 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 175 7.85 185 11.67 137 10.90 196.50 15.01 120.00 11.07 814 56.50
9 Consolidation phase 3 11.300.23 2.26 2.37 2.26 2.26 1.92 11.30
a Capacity Enhancement for post project management
0 11.30 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 11.30 0 11.30b Impact documentation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00c Scalling up operation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00d Monitoring and Evaluation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00e Photography 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub-Total (9) 11.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.30 0.00 11.30Grand Total 100 376.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 426.00 73.10 515.00 83.05 439.00 79.59 468.50 68.62 298.00 62.76 2146.50 376.68
Total Area 1932 HaTotal Sanction Amount 231.84 Lack
Sl.No. Budget component % of the Budget Units No/Ha Quantity Rate in Rs Budget in
LakhsUnits Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget
2 20 21 20 20 170.00 5.37 46.03 48.18 46.37 46.37 39.52 231.84
1 Administrative costs 10 23.18 0.00 1.16 3.48 7.42 6.492 2.32 2.32 0 23.182 Monitoring 1 2.32 0.00 0.46 0.93 0.93 0 2.323 Evaluation 1 2.32 0.00 0.70 0.811 0.81 0 2.32
Sub-total (1+2+3) 27.82 0 0.00 0 1.16 0 4.64 0 8.35 0 7.30 0 4.06 0 2.32 0 27.824 Entry Point activity 4 9.27 2.92 6.35 0 9.27
Total [4] #REF! 9.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.92 0.00 6.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 9.275 Detailed project Report 1 2.32 1.8 0.52 0 2.32
Total [5] #REF! 2.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.80 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2.326 Institution and Capacity building 5 11.59
0.23 2.32 2.43 2.32 2.32 1.97 11.59a Awareness Programme No 12 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 3 0.24 3 0.24 3 0.24 3 0.24 0.00 12 0.96b Institutrional building No 8 0.20 1.60 0.00 0.00 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40 0.00 8 1.60c Exposure visit [External] No 6 0.35 2.10 0.00 0.00 1 0.35 1 0.35 2 0.70 2 0.70 0.00 6 2.10d Exposure visit [local] No 5 0.15 0.75 0.00 0.00 1 0.15 2 0.30 1 0.15 1 0.15 0.00 5 0.75e Field training No 8 0.10 0.80 0.00 0.00 2 0.20 2 0.20 2 0.20 2 0.20 0.00 8 0.80f Padyatra/ Campaign No 2 0.75 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.75 0.00 1 0.75 0.00 2 1.50g Vaternary and Health Camp No 8 0.25 1.96 0.00 0.00 2 0.49 2 0.49 2 0.49 2 0.49 0.00 8 1.96h SHG Capacity building No 8 0.08 0.64 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 0.00 8 0.64i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 8 0.08 0.64 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 0.00 8 0.64j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 8 0.08 0.64 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 0.00 8 0.64
Total [6] 73 11.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.00 2.31 19.00 3.21 18.00 2.66 19.00 3.41 0.00 0.00 73.00 11.59
Sub-Total (4+5+6) 23.18 0 0.00 0 4.72 17 9.18 19 3.21 18 2.66 19 3.41 0.00 0.00 73 23.18
7 Watershed development works 60 139.107.a Arable Land 43.82 0.88 8.76 9.20 8.76 8.76 7.45 43.82a Farm Bunding Ha 283 0.13 37.57 0.00 0.00 30.00 3.99 71.00 9.44 62.38 8.30 70.00 9.31 49 6.53 283 37.57b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 2 1.34 2.68 0.00 0.00 1 1.34 0.00 1 1.34 0.00 0.00 2 2.68c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 2 0.73 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.73 0.00 1 0.73 0.00 2 1.46d Regeneration No 174 0.02 3.48 0.00 0.00 42 0.84 44 0.88 43 0.86 21 0.42 24 0.48 174 3.48
Total (7.a) 45.19 0 0.00 0 0.00 73 6.17 116 11.05 106 10.50 92 10.46 73 7.01 461 45.19
7.b Land Development and Regeneration 57.73
1.15 11.55 12.12 11.55 11.55 9.81 57.73a P. D. on Private Land Ha 99.5 0.097 9.65 0.00 0.00 12 1.12 22 2.13 22 2.13 22 2.13 22 2.13 99.5 9.65b P.D. on Common Land Ha 80 0.43 34.08 0.00 0.00 20 8.52 20 8.52 20 8.52 20 8.52 0.00 80 34.08c Open contour Trench Ha 40 0.07 2.80 0.00 0.00 20 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 20 1.40 40 2.80d Earthen Dugout Pond No 5 0.62 3.12 0.00 0.00 1 0.62 1 0.62 2 1.25 1 0.62 0.00 5 3.12e New Nadi No 3 1.67 5.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.67 1 1.67 1 1.67 0.00 3 5.01f Repair of Nadi No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 1 3.07 3.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 3.07 0.00 0.00 1 3.07
Total (7.b) 0 57.73 0 0.00 0 0.00 53 11.66 44 12.95 46 16.64 44 12.95 42 3.53 229 57.737.c Drainage Line Treatment 42.70
0.85 8.54 8.97 8.54 8.54 7.26 42.70a LBCD No 117 0.056 6.55 0.00 0.00 29 1.62 29 1.62 29 1.62 30 1.68 0.00 117 6.55b Gabions No 5 0.492 2.46 0.00 0.00 1 0.49 2 0.98 1 0.49 1 0.49 0.00 5 2.46c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 3 11.93 11.93 0.00 0.00 1 3.50 1 3.58 0.00 0.00 1 4.85 3 11.93
d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 4 3.809 15.24 0.00 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81 4 15.24
Total (7.c) 0 36.18 0 0.00 0 0.00 32 9.43 33 10.00 30 2.12 32 5.98 2 8.66 129 36.18
Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 139.10 0 0.00 0 0.00 158 27.26 193 34.00 182 29.25 168 29.39 117.12 19.21 818 139.10
8Production Enhancement & Livelihood activities for the asset less persons
15 34.78
8.a Women / differentially abled centered micro enterprise 1.35
0.03 0.27 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.23 1.35
a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 15 0.09 1.35 0.00 0.00 2 0.18 4 0.36 4 0.36 3 0.27 2 0.18 15 1.35
Total
WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PANCHAYAT-TITORI, TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Total [8.a] 15 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.18 4.00 0.36 4.00 0.36 3.00 0.27 2.00 0.18 15.00 1.358.b Livestock & Dairy management 7.11
0.14 1.42 1.49 1.42 1.42 1.21 7.11a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 8 0.325 2.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.33 4 1.30 0 0.00 3 0.98 8 2.60b Goat Rearing No 43 0.064 2.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 0.70 11 0.70 10 0.64 11 0.70 43 2.73c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 19 0.025 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 0.25 5 0.13 4 0.10 0 0.00 19 0.48d Breed Improvement [AI] No 283 0.00150 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 30 0.05 71 0.11 70 0.11 112 0.17 283 0.42
e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 1 0.30
f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 1 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 0.00 1 0.25
g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 3 0.11 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.11 1 0.11 1 0.11 3 0.33
Total [8.b] 358 7.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.00 1.32 93.00 2.59 85.00 0.95 128.00 2.25 358.00 7.118.c Energy conservation 3.13
0.06 0.63 0.66 0.63 0.63 0.53 3.13a Bio-gas No 10 0.21 2.05 0.00 0.00 2 0.41 2 0.41 2 0.41 3 0.62 1 0.21 10 2.05b Pressure cookers No 30 0.02 0.52 0.00 0.00 8 0.14 0 0.00 8 0.14 7 0.12 7 0.12 30 0.52c Energy efficient light No 31 0.02 0.56 0.00 0.00 8 0.14 0 0.00 8 0.14 7 0.13 8 0.14 31 0.56
Total [8.c] 71 3.13 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 18 0.69 2 0.41 18 0.69 17 0.86 16 0.47 71 3.13
8.d Skill enhancement of Para workers/ individuals on agreed sectors 3.44
0.07 0.69 0.72 0.69 0.69 0.58 3.44
a Skill development of Para-workers per training cost
43 0.08 3.44 0.00 0.00 7 0.56 9 0.72 9 0.72 9 0.72 9 0.72 43 3.44Total [8.d] 43 3.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.56 9.00 0.72 9.00 0.72 9.00 0.72 9.00 0.72 43.00 3.44
8.e Agriculture 6.670.13 1.33 1.40 1.33 1.33 1.13 6.67
a Low External Input for Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA)
Ha 56 0.04 2.04 0.00 0.00 14 0.51 14 0.51 14 0.51 14 0.51 0.00 56 2.04b Fodder Demo Ha 5 0.37 1.83 0.00 0.00 1 0.37 2 0.73 1 0.37 1 0.37 0.00 5 1.83c Grain / Seed Bank No 1 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.70d BD Composting No 17 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.00 4 0.06 3 0.04 5 0.07 4 0.06 1 0.01 17 0.24e Pit Composting No 11 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 5 0.05 4 0.04 2 0.02 11 0.11f Integrated Farm Model No 1 1.74 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.74 0.00 0.00 1 1.74
Total [8.e] 90 6.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.93 20.00 1.99 26.00 2.74 23.00 0.97 3.00 0.03 91.00 6.678.f Horticulture 2.39
0.05 0.48 0.50 0.48 0.48 0.41 2.39a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 3 0.64 1.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.64 1 0.64 1 0.64 0.00 3 1.92b Kitchen garden No 10 0.05 0.47 0.00 0.00 2 0.09 1 0.05 2 0.09 2 0.09 3 0.14 10 0.47
Total [8.f] 13 2.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.09 2.00 0.69 3.00 0.73 3.00 0.73 3.00 0.14 13 2.398.g Efficient Irrigation 1.44
0.03 0.29 0.30 0.29 0.29 0.24 1.44a Pipe line Irrigation No 12 0.12 1.44 0.00 0.00 3 0.36 0.00 3 0.36 3 0.36 2 0.24 11 1.32
Total [8.g] 12 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.36 3.00 0.36 2.00 0.24 11.00 1.328.h Agriculture based micro enterprise 5.20
0.10 1.04 1.09 1.04 1.04 0.88 5.20
aProvision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs etc No 4 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 1.00 2 1.00 4 2.00
b Vermi composting 7 0.29 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.57 1 0.29 2 0.57 1 0.29 1 0.29 7 2.00c Electric Multipurpose thresher 6 0.20 1.20 0.00 0.00 1 0.20 1 0.20 1 0.20 1 0.20 2 0.40 6 1.20
Total [8.h] 4 5.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.77 2.00 0.49 3.00 0.77 4.00 1.49 5.00 1.69 17.00 5.208.i Livestock & Dairy based enterprise 2.00
0.04 0.40 0.42 0.40 0.40 0.34 2.00
a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 5 0.33 1.63 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.33 0.00 1 0.33 1 0.33 2 0.65 5 1.63
b Chaff Cutter 5 0.10 0.50 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 5 0.50Total [8.i] 5 2.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.43 1.00 0.10 2.00 0.43 2.00 0.43 3.00 0.75 10.00 2.13
8.j Non farm micro enterprise 2.050.04 0.41 0.43 0.41 0.41 0.35 2.05
a Mobile repairing per candidate cost 8 0.09 0.73 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0.73 0.00 8 0.73
b Domestic Electric and based appliances repair training
per candidate cost 8 0.09 0.73 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0.73 8 0.73
c Flour Mill 2 0.30 0.60 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 1 0.30 2 0.60Total [8.j] 18 2.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.03 9.00 1.03 18.00 2.05
Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 34.91 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 56 4.02 92 6.07 161 9.40 158.00 7.81 180.00 7.50 647 34.79
9 Consolidation phase 3 6.960.14 1.39 1.46 1.39 1.39 1.18 6.96
a Capacity Enhancement for post project management 0 6.96 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 6.96 0 6.96
b Impact documentation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00c Scalling up operation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00d Monitoring and Evaluation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00e Photography 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub-Total (9) 6.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.96 0.00 6.96Grand Total 100 231.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.88 230.50 45.09 304.00 51.62 361.38 48.61 345.00 44.66 297.12 35.98 1538.00 231.84
Total Area 1498 HaTotal Sanction Amount 179.76 Lack
Sl.No. Budget component % of the Budget
Units No/Ha Quantity Rate
in RsBudget in
LakhsUnits Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget
0 2 20 21 20 20 170 4.166319 35.6907718 37.3572994 35.95116674 35.95116674 30.643276 179.76
1 Administrative costs 10 17.98 0.00 0.90 2.70 5.75 5.033 1.80 1.80 0 17.982 Monitoring 1 1.80 0.00 0.36 0.72 0.72 0 1.803 Evaluation 1 1.80 0.00 0.54 0.629 0.63 0 1.80
Sub-total (1+2+3) 21.57 0 0.00 0 0.90 0 3.60 0 6.47 0 5.66 0 3.15 0 1.80 0 21.574 Entry Point activity 4 7.19 2.63 4.56 0 7.19
Total [4] 7.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.63 0.00 4.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7.195 Detailed project Report 1 1.80 0.64 0.78 0.38 0 1.80
Total [5] 1.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1.806 Institution and Capacity building 5 8.99
0.18 1.80 1.89 1.80 1.80 1.53 8.99a Awareness Programme No 10 0.08 0.81 0.00 0.00 2 0.17 3 0.24 3 0.24 2 0.16 0.00 10 0.81b Institutrional building No 8 0.20 1.60 0.00 0.00 2 0.40 1 0.20 2 0.40 3 0.60 0.00 8 1.60c Exposure visit [External] No 4 0.35 1.40 0.00 0.00 1 0.35 1 0.35 1 0.35 1 0.35 0.00 4 1.40d Exposure visit [local] No 6 0.15 0.90 0.00 0.00 1 0.15 1 0.15 2 0.30 2 0.30 0.00 6 0.90e Field training No 7 0.10 0.70 0.00 0.00 3 0.30 1 0.10 2 0.20 1 0.10 0.00 7 0.70f Padyatra/ Campaign No 1 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.75 0.00 0.00 1 0.75g Vaternary and Health Camp No 6 0.25 1.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.49 2 0.49 2 0.49 0.00 6 1.47h SHG Capacity building No 5 0.08 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 2 0.16 1 0.08 0.00 5 0.40i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 8 0.08 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 3 0.24 3 0.24 0.00 8 0.64j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 4 0.08 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 1 0.08 1 0.08 0.00 4 0.32
Total [6] 59 8.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.37 15.00 2.01 19.00 3.21 16.00 2.40 0.00 0.00 59.00 8.99
Sub-Total (4+5+6) 17.98 0 0.00 0 3.27 9 6.71 15 2.39 19 3.21 16 2.40 0.00 0.00 59 17.98
7 Watershed development works 60 107.867.a Arable Land 38.34 0.77 7.67 8.05 7.67 7.67 6.52 38.34a Farm Bunding Ha 214 0.13 28.46 0.00 0.00 30 3.99 50 6.65 50 6.65 34 4.52 50 6.65 214 28.46b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 2 1.34 2.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.34 1 1.34 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 2.68c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 5 0.73 3.65 0.00 0.00 1 0.73 1 0.73 2 1.46 1 0.73 0 0.00 5 3.65d Regeneration No 202 0.02 4.05 0.00 0.00 51 1.02 50 1.00 51 1.02 50 1.01 0 0.00 202 4.05
Total (7.a) 38.84 0 0.00 0 0.00 82 5.74 102 9.72 104 10.47 85 6.26 50 6.65 423 38.84
7.b Land Development and Regeneration 35.90
0.72 7.18 7.54 7.18 7.18 6.10 35.90a P. D. on Private Land Ha 15 0.097 1.46 0.00 0.00 3 0.29 3 0.29 3 0.29 3 0.29 3 0.29 15 1.46b P.D. on Common Land Ha 40 0.43 17.04 0.00 0.00 20 8.52 5 2.13 5 2.13 5 2.13 5 2.13 40 17.04c Open contour Trench Ha 40 0.07 2.80 0.00 0.00 10 0.70 10 0.70 10 0.70 10 0.70 0.00 40 2.80d Earthen Dugout Pond No 5 0.62 3.12 0.00 0.00 1 0.62 2 1.25 1 0.62 1 0.62 0.00 5 3.12e New Nadi No 5 1.67 8.35 0.00 0.00 1 1.67 1 1.67 1 1.67 2 3.34 0.00 5 8.35f Repair of Nadi No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 1 3.13 3.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 3.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 3.13
Total (7.b) 0 35.90 0 0.00 0 0.00 35 11.81 22 9.17 20 5.42 21 7.09 8 2.42 106 35.907.c Drainage Line Treatment 33.13
0.66 6.63 6.96 6.63 6.63 5.63 33.13a LBCD No 41 0.056 2.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 21 1.18 0.00 20 1.12 0.00 41 2.30b Gabions No 10 0.492 4.92 0.00 0.00 2 0.98 3 1.48 3 1.48 2 0.98 0.00 10 4.92c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 2 10.674 10.674 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 10.67 2 10.67
d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 4 3.809 15.24 0.00 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81 1 3.81 1 3.81 0.00 4 15.24
Total (7.c) 0 33.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 3 4.79 25 6.46 4 5.29 23 5.91 2 10.67 57 33.12
Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 107.86 0 0.00 0 0.00 120 22.34 149 25.35 128 21.17 129 19.26 60.00 19.74 586 107.86
8Production Enhancement & Livelihood activities for the asset less persons
15 26.96
8.a Women / differentially abled centered micro enterprise 1.17
0.02 0.23 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.20 1.17
2015-16
WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PANCHAYAT-BAORI, TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Total
a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 13 0.09 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 0.54 0.00 0.00 7 0.63 13 1.17
Total [8.a] 13 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.63 13.00 1.178.b Livestock & Dairy management 5.39
0.11 1.08 1.13 1.08 1.08 0.92 5.39a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 8 0.325 2.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.65 2 0.65 2 0.65 2 0.65 8 2.60b Goat Rearing No 20 0.064 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 0.32 5 0.32 5 0.32 5 0.32 20 1.27c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 12 0.025 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0.08 3 0.08 3 0.08 3 0.08 12 0.30d Breed Improvement [AI] No 209 #### 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 53 0.08 52 0.08 52 0.08 52 0.08 209 0.31
e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 0.00 0.00 1 0.30
f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 2 0.25 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 2 0.50
g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 1 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.11 0.00 1 0.11
Total [8.b] 253 5.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.00 1.37 63.00 1.42 64.00 1.48 62.00 1.12 253.00 5.398.c Energy conservation 2.42
0.05 0.48 0.51 0.48 0.48 0.41 2.42a Bio-gas No 9 0.21 1.85 0.00 0.00 2 0.41 3 0.62 2 0.41 2 0.41 0.00 9 1.85b Pressure cookers No 24 0.02 0.41 0.00 0.00 3 0.05 6 0.10 6 0.10 6 0.10 3 0.05 24 0.41c Energy efficient light No 9 0.02 0.16 0.00 0.00 1 0.02 2 0.04 3 0.05 2 0.04 1 0.02 9 0.16
Total [8.c] 42 2.42 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 6 0.48 11 0.75 11 0.57 10 0.55 4 0.07 42 2.42
8.d Skill enhancement of Para workers/ individuals on agreed sectors 2.64
0.05 0.53 0.55 0.53 0.53 0.45 2.64
a Skill development of Para-workers per training cost
33 0.08 2.64 0.00 0.00 6 0.48 7 0.56 7 0.56 7 0.56 6 0.48 33 2.64Total [8.d] 33 2.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.48 7.00 0.56 7.00 0.56 7.00 0.56 6.00 0.48 33.00 2.64
8.e Agriculture 4.990.10 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 0.85 4.99
a Low External Input for Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA)
Ha 55 0.04 2.00 0.00 0.00 14 0.51 14 0.51 14 0.51 13 0.47 0.00 55 2.00b Fodder Demo Ha 1 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.37 0.00 0.00 1 0.37c Grain / Seed Bank No 1 0.70 0.70 0.00 0.00 1 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.70d BD Composting No 8 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 2 0.03 0.00 4 0.06 2 0.03 0.00 8 0.11e Pit Composting No 6 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 1 0.01 0 0.00 5 0.05 0.00 0.00 6 0.06f Integrated Farm Model No 1 1.74 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.74 0.00 0.00 1 1.74
Total [8.e] 71 4.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.00 1.25 14.00 0.51 25.00 2.73 15.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 72.00 4.998.f Horticulture 1.99
0.04 0.40 0.42 0.40 0.40 0.34 1.99a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 2 0.64 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.64 1 0.64 0.00 2 1.28b Kitchen garden No 15 0.05 0.71 0.00 0.00 5 0.24 2 0.09 4 0.19 4 0.19 0.00 15 0.71
Total [8.f] 17 1.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.24 2.00 0.09 5.00 0.83 5.00 0.83 0.00 0.00 17 1.998.g Efficient Irrigation 1.08
0.02 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.18 1.08a Pipe line Irrigation No 9 0.12 1.08 0.00 0.00 2 0.24 3 0.36 1 0.12 3 0.36 0.00 9 1.08
Total [8.g] 9 1.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.24 3.00 0.36 1.00 0.12 3.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.088.h Agriculture based micro enterprise 4.00
0.08 0.80 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.68 4.00
aProvision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs etc No 2 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.50 1 0.50 2 1.00
b Vermi composting 7 0.29 2.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.57 2 0.57 3 0.86 0.00 7 2.00c Electric Multipurpose thresher 5 0.20 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.40 2 0.40 1 0.20 0.00 5 1.00
Total [8.h] 2 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.97 4.00 0.97 5.00 1.56 1.00 0.50 14.00 4.008.i Livestock & Dairy based enterprise 1.70
0.03 0.34 0.36 0.34 0.34 0.29 1.70
a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 4 0.33 1.30 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.33 1 0.33 2 0.65 0.00 4 1.30
b Chaff Cutter 4 0.10 0.40 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 4 0.40Total [8.i] 4 1.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.43 2.00 0.43 3.00 0.75 1.00 0.10 8.00 1.70
8.j Non farm micro enterprise 1.570.03 0.31 0.33 0.31 0.31 0.27 1.57
a Mobile repairing per
candidate cost
7 0.09 0.63 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 7 0.63 0.00 0.00 7 0.63
b Domestic Electric and based appliances repair training
per candidate
cost
7 0.09 0.63 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 0.63 0.00 7 0.63
c Flour Mill 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 0.00 1 0.30Total [8.j] 15 1.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.63 8.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 15.00 1.57
Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 26.96 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 37 2.69 113 5.59 125 8.26 120.00 7.52 81.00 2.90 476 26.96
9 Consolidation phase 3 5.390.11 1.08 1.13 1.08 1.08 0.92 5.39
a Capacity Enhancement for post project management 0 5.39 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 5.39 0 5.39
b Impact documentation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00c Scalling up operation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00d Monitoring and Evaluation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00e Photography 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub-Total (9) 5.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.39 0.00 5.39Grand Total 100 179.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.17 166.00 35.33 277.00 39.80 272.00 38.30 265.00 32.33 141.00 29.83 1121.00 179.76
Total Area 328 HaTotal Sanction Amount 39.36 Lack
Sl.No. Budget component % of the Budget Units No/Ha Quantity Rate in Rs Budget in
LakhsUnits Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget
0 2 20 21 20 20 170 0.9122514 7.814801836 8.179702406 7.87181755 7.87181755 6.7096092 39.36
1 Administrative costs 10 3.94 0.00 0.20 0.59 1.26 1.102 0.39 0.39 0 3.942 Monitoring 1 0.39 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.16 0 0.393 Evaluation 1 0.39 0.00 0.12 0.138 0.14 0 0.39
Sub-total (1+2+3) 4.72 0 0.00 0 0.20 0 0.79 0 1.42 0 1.24 0 0.69 0 0.39 0 4.724 Entry Point activity 4 1.57 0.41 1.16 0 1.57
Total [4] 1.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1.575 Detailed project Report 1 0.39 0.39 0 0.39
Total [5] 0 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.396 Institution and Capacity building 5 1.97
0.04 0.39 0.41 0.39 0.39 0.33 1.97a Awareness Programme No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08b Institutrional building No 2 0.20 0.40 0.00 0.00 1 0.20 1 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.40c Exposure visit [External] No 1 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.35 0.00 1 0.35d Exposure visit [local] No 3 0.15 0.45 0.00 0.00 1 0.15 0.00 1 0.15 1 0.15 0.00 3 0.45e Field training No 2 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.10 1 0.10 0.00 2 0.20f Padyatra/ Campaign No 0 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Vaternary and Health Camp No 1 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25h SHG Capacity building No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 1 0.08i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 1 0.08j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08
Total [6] 13 1.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.43 3.00 0.53 3.00 0.33 4.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.97
Sub-Total (4+5+6) 3.93 0 0.00 0 0.80 3 1.59 3 0.53 3 0.33 4 0.68 0.00 0.00 13 3.93
7 Watershed development works 60 23.627.a Arable Land 7.18 0.14 1.44 1.51 1.44 1.44 1.22 7.18a Farm Bunding Ha 31 0.13 4.12 0.00 0.00 8 1.06 8 1.06 8 1.06 7 0.93 0.00 31 4.12b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 1.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 2 0.73 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.73 1 0.73 0.00 0.00 2 1.46d Regeneration No 80 0.02 1.60 0.00 0.00 20 0.40 20 0.40 20 0.40 20 0.40 0.00 80 1.60
Total (7.a) 7.18 0 0.00 0 0.00 28 1.46 29 2.19 29 2.19 27 1.33 0 0.00 113 7.18
7.b Land Development and Regeneration 9.83
0.20 1.97 2.06 1.97 1.97 1.67 9.83a P. D. on Private Land Ha 10.1 0.097 0.98 0.00 0.00 1 0.11 3 0.29 2 0.29 3 0.29 0.00 9 0.98b P.D. on Common Land Ha 10 0.43 4.26 0.00 0.00 3 1.28 2 0.85 3 1.28 2 0.85 0.00 10 4.26c Open contour Trench Ha 0 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00d Earthen Dugout Pond No 2 0.62 1.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.62 1 0.62 0.00 0.00 2 1.25e New Nadi No 2 1.67 3.34 0.00 0.00 1 1.67 0.00 0.00 1 1.67 0.00 2 3.34f Repair of Nadi No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 0 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Total (7.b) 0 9.83 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 3.05 6 1.77 6 2.19 6 2.81 0 0.00 23 9.837.c Drainage Line Treatment 6.61
0.13 1.32 1.39 1.32 1.32 1.12 6.61a LBCD No 50 0.056 2.80 0.00 0.00 10 0.56 13 0.73 14 0.78 13 0.73 0.00 50 2.80b Gabions No 0.492 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 10.674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 1 3.809 3.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81
Total (7.c) 0 6.61 0 0.00 0 0.00 10 0.56 13 0.73 14 0.78 13 0.73 1 3.81 51 6.61
Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 23.62 0 0.00 0 0.00 43 5.08 48 4.69 49 5.17 46 4.87 1.00 3.81 187 23.62
8Production Enhancement & Livelihood activities for the asset less persons
15 5.90
8.a Women / differentially abled centered micro enterprise 0.18
0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.18
a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 2 0.09 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 1 0.09 0.00 2 0.18
Total [8.a] 2 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.18
Total
WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PANCHAYAT-PANDER, TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
8.b Livestock & Dairy management 1.180.02 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.20 1.18
a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 1 0.325 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.33b Goat Rearing No 2 0.064 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.06 1 0.06 0.00 0.00 2 0.13c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 2 0.025 0.05 0.00 0.00 1 0.03 0.00 1 0.03 0.00 0.00 2 0.05d Breed Improvement [AI] No 15 0.00150 0.02 0.00 0.00 3 0.00450 3 0.00450 3 0.00450 3 0.00450 3 0.0045 15 0.02
e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30
f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 1 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 1 0.25
g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 1 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.11 0.00 0.00 1 0.11
Total [8.b] 23 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.03 6.00 0.69 6.00 0.20 4.00 0.25 3.00 0.0045 23.00 1.188.c Energy conservation 0.53
0.01 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.53a Bio-gas No 2 0.21 0.41 0.00 0.00 1 0.21 0.00 0.00 1 0.21 0.00 2 0.41b Pressure cookers No 5 0.02 0.09 0.00 0.00 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 1 0.02 5 0.09c Energy efficient light No 2 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.02 0.00 1 0.02 0.00 2 0.04
Total [8.c] 9 0.53 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.22 2 0.04 1 0.02 3 0.24 1 0.02 9 0.53
8.d Skill enhancement of Para workers/ individuals on agreed sectors 0.56
0.01 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.56
a Skill development of Para-workers per training cost
7 0.08 0.56 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 3 0.24 2 0.16 0 0.00 1 0.08 7 0.56Total [8.d] 7 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.08 3.00 0.24 2.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.08 7.00 0.56
8.e Agriculture 1.190.02 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.20 1.19
a Low External Input for Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA)
Ha 18 0.04 0.66 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 9 0.33 2 0.07 4 0.15 3 0.11 18 0.66b Fodder Demo Ha 1 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.37 0.00 0.00 1 0.37c Grain / Seed Bank No 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00d BD Composting No 5 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 1 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 5 0.07e Pit Composting No 12 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 2 0.02 1 0.01 3 0.03 2 0.02 4 0.04 12 0.12f Integrated Farm Model No 0 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Total [8.e] 36 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.03 11.00 0.35 7.00 0.48 7.00 0.18 8.00 0.16 36.00 1.218.f Horticulture 0.43
0.01 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.43a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00b Kitchen garden No 9 0.05 0.43 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 3 0.14 3 0.14 3 0.14 0.00 9 0.43
Total [8.f] 9 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.14 3.00 0.14 3.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 9 0.438.g Efficient Irrigation 0.24
0.00 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.24a Pipe line Irrigation No 2 0.12 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.12 0.00 0.00 1 0.12 2 0.24
Total [8.g] 2 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.12 2.00 0.248.h Agriculture based micro enterprise 0.89
0.02 0.18 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.89
aProvision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs No 1 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.50 0.00 1 0.50
b Vermi composting 1 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.29 0.00 0.00 1 0.29c Electric Multipurpose thresher 1 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.20
Total [8.h] 1 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.998.i Livestock & Dairy based enterprise 0.30
0.01 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.30
a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 0 0.33 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
b Chaff Cutter 2 0.10 0.20 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1 0.10 0.00 1 0.10 0.00 2 0.20Total [8.i] 0 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.20
8.j Non farm micro enterprise 0.390.01 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.39
a Mobile repairing per candidate cost 1 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 0.00 0.00 1 0.09
b Domestic Electric and based appliances repair training
per candidate cost 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
c Flour Mill 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 1 0.30Total [8.j] 2 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.30 2.00 0.39
Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 5.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.37 28.00 1.88 22.00 1.47 20.00 1.51 15.00 0.69 95.00 5.91
9 Consolidation phase 3 1.180.02 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.20 1.18
a Capacity Enhancement for post project management 0 1.18 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.18 0 1.18
b Impact documentation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00c Scalling up operation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00d Monitoring and Evaluation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00e Photography 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub-Total (9) 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.00 1.18Grand Total 100 39.37 0.00 39.36 0.00 1.00 56.10 7.82 79.00 8.51 74.00 8.21 70.00 7.75 16.00 6.07 295.10 39.36
Total Area 294 HaTotal Sanction Amount 35.28 Lack
Sl.No. Budget component % of the Budget Units No/Ha Quantity Rate in Rs Budget in
LakhsUnits Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget Units Budget
0 2 20 21 20 20 170 0.8176888 7.004730914 7.331806425 7.055836462 7.055836462 6.014101 35.28
1 Administrative costs 10 3.53 0.00 0.18 0.53 1.13 0.988 0.35 0.35 0 3.532 Monitoring 1 0.35 0.00 0.07 0.14 0.14 0 0.353 Evaluation 1 0.35 0.00 0.11 0.123 0.12 0 0.35
Sub-total (1+2+3) 4.23 0 0.00 0 0.18 0 0.71 0 1.27 0 1.11 0 0.62 0 0.35 0 4.234 Entry Point activity 4 1.41 0.37 1.04 0 1.41
Total [4] 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1.415 Detailed project Report 1 0.35 0.35 0 0.35
Total [5] 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.356 Institution and Capacity building 5 1.76
0.04 0.35 0.37 0.35 0.35 0.30 1.76a Awareness Programme No 4 0.08 0.32 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 1 0.08 1 0.08 1 0.08 0.00 4 0.32b Institutrional building No 1 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.20 0.00 1 0.20c Exposure visit [External] No 1 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.35d Exposure visit [local] No 2 0.15 0.30 0.00 0.00 1 0.15 0.00 1 0.15 0.00 0.00 2 0.30e Field training No 1 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.10 0.00 1 0.10f Padyatra/ Campaign No 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Vaternary and Health Camp No 1 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25h SHG Capacity building No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 1 0.08i Sinages,wall painting, boards No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08j Audit (Physical,financial and social) No 1 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.08 0.00 1 0.08
Total [6] 13 1.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.23 4.00 0.76 3.00 0.31 4.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.76
Sub-Total (4+5+6) 3.52 0 0.00 0 0.72 2 1.27 4 0.76 3 0.31 4 0.46 0.00 0.00 13 3.52
7 Watershed development works 60 21.177.a Arable Land 5.94 0.12 1.19 1.25 1.19 1.19 1.01 5.94a Farm Bunding Ha 20 0.13 2.66 0.00 0.00 10 1.33 5 0.67 0.00 5 0.67 0.00 20 2.66b Farm Pond (Puccka) No 1 1.34 1.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.34c Farm Pond (Kaccha with poly bag) No 2 0.73 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.73 0.00 1 0.73 0.00 2 1.46d Regeneration No 24 0.02 0.48 0.00 0.00 6 0.12 6 0.12 6 0.12 6 0.12 0.00 24 0.48
Total (7.a) 5.94 0 0.00 0 0.00 16 1.45 13 2.86 6 0.12 12 1.51 0 0.00 47 5.94
7.b Land Development and Regeneration 8.78
0.18 1.76 1.84 1.76 1.76 1.49 8.78a P. D. on Private Land Ha 10 0.097 0.97 0.00 0.00 5 0.49 3 0.29 0.00 2 0.19 0.00 10 0.97b P.D. on Common Land Ha 10 0.43 4.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 4.26 0.00 0.00 10 4.26c Open contour Trench Ha 18 0.07 1.26 0.00 0.00 4 0.28 5 0.35 5 0.35 4 0.28 0.00 18 1.26d Earthen Dugout Pond No 1 0.62 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.62e New Nadi No 1 1.67 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.67 0.00 1 1.67f Repair of Nadi No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00g Repair of Anicut No 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Total (7.b) 40 8.78 0 0.00 0 0.00 9 0.77 9 1.27 15 4.61 7 2.14 0 0.00 40 8.787.c Drainage Line Treatment 6.45
0.13 1.29 1.35 1.29 1.29 1.10 6.45a LBCD No 29.5 0.056 1.65 0.00 0.00 7 0.39 8 0.45 8 0.42 7 0.39 0.00 30 1.65b Gabions No 2 0.492 0.98 0.00 0.00 1 0.49 1 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.98c R.R Stone Masonary Structure No 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
d Earthen Nadi/Dam with connected waste weir No 1 3.809 3.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 3.81 1 3.81
Total (7.c) 0 6.45 0 0.00 0 0.00 8 0.88 9 0.94 8 0.42 7 0.39 1 3.81 33 6.45
Sub-total (7.a+7.b+7.c) 21.17 0 0.00 0 0.00 33 3.10 31 5.06 29 5.15 26 4.05 1.00 3.81 120 21.17
8 Production Enhancement & Livelihood activities for the asset less persons 15 5.29
8.a Women / differentially abled centered micro enterprise 0.18
0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.18
a Skill Enhancement (Stiching/Tailoring/Kasidakari) 2 0.09 0.18 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 0.00 2 0.18
Total [8.a] 2 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.18
Total
WORK PLAN OF IWMP WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PANCHAYAT-PHALASIYA, TEH. -JAHAZPUR DISST.- BHILWARA
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
8.b Livestock & Dairy management 1.070.02 0.21 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.18 1.07
a Cow/Buffalo Rearing No 1 0.325 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.33b Goat Rearing No 0 0.064 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00c Fodder Innovatioin & management No 3 0.025 0.08 0.00 0.00 1 0.03 0.00 1 0.03 1 0.03 0.00 3 0.08d Breed Improvement [AI] No 80 0.00150 0.12 0.00 0.00 20 0.03 20 0.03 20 0.03 20 0.03 0.00 80 0.12
e Cattle services by Natural service in Buffalo (Bull) No 1 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.30
f Cattle services by Natural service in cow (Bull) No 1 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.25
g Cattle services by Natural service in Goat (Service Buck) No 0 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Total [8.b] 86 1.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.00 0.06 23.00 0.91 21.00 0.06 21.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 86.00 1.078.c Energy conservation 0.47
0.01 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.47a Bio-gas No 1 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 1 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.21b Pressure cookers No 8 0.02 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.03 2 0.03 2 0.03 2 0.03 8 0.13c Energy efficient light No 8 0.02 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.04 2 0.04 2 0.04 2 0.04 8 0.14
Total [8.c] 17 0.48 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.21 4 0.06 4 0.07 4 0.07 4 0.07 17 0.48
8.d Skill enhancement of Para workers/ individuals on agreed sectors 0.48
0.01 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.48
a Skill development of Para-workers per training cost
6 0.08 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.16 2 0.16 2 0.16 6 0.48Total [8.d] 6 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.16 2.00 0.16 2.00 0.16 6.00 0.48
8.e Agriculture 1.070.02 0.21 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.18 1.07
a Low External Input for Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA)
Ha 15 0.04 0.55 0.00 0.00 9 0.33 0.00 3 0.11 3 0.11 0.00 15 0.55b Fodder Demo Ha 1 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 1 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.37c Grain / Seed Bank No 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00d BD Composting No 4 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 4 0.06e Pit Composting No 11 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 7 0.07 0.00 4 0.04 0.00 0.00 11 0.11f Integrated Farm Model No 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Total [8.e] 31 1.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.00 0.76 1.00 0.01 8.00 0.16 4.00 0.12 1.00 0.01 31.00 1.088.f Horticulture 0.33
0.01 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.33a Horticulture Farm of Anar with drip No 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00b Kitchen garden No 7 0.05 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.09 2 0.09 2 0.09 1 0.05 7 0.33
Total [8.f] 7 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.09 2.00 0.09 2.00 0.09 1.00 0.05 7 0.338.g Efficient Irrigation 0.24
0.00 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.24a Pipe line Irrigation No 2 0.12 0.24 0.00 0.00 2 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.24
Total [8.g] 2 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.248.h Agriculture based micro enterprise 0.79
0.02 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.79
aProvision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs etc No 1 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.50 0.00 1 0.50
b Vermi composting 1 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.29 0.00 0.00 1 0.29c Electric Multipurpose thresher 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Total [8.h] 1 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.798.i Livestock & Dairy based enterprise 0.30
0.01 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.30
a Integrated livestock and Dairy based enterprise No 0.33 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
b Chaff Cutter 3 0.10 0.30 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.20 0.00 0.00 1 0.10 0.00 3 0.30Total [8.i] 0 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.30
8.j Non farm micro enterprise 0.360.01 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.36
a Mobile repairing per candidate cost 2 0.09 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 1 0.09 0.00 2 0.18
b Domestic Electric and based appliances repair training
per candidate cost 2 0.09 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.09 1 0.09 0.00 2 0.18
c Flour Mill 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00Total [8.j] 4 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.18 2.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.36
Sub-Total (8.a to 8.j) 5.31 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 44 1.55 30 1.08 40 1.01 38.00 1.38 8.00 0.29 160 5.31
9 Consolidation phase 3 1.060.02 0.21 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.18 1.06
a Capacity Enhancement for post project management 0 1.06 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.06 0 1.06
b Impact documentation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00c Scalling up operation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00d Monitoring and Evaluation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00e Photography 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sub-Total (9) 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.00 1.06Grand Total 100 35.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 79.00 6.63 64.50 8.16 71.50 7.58 68.00 6.50 9.00 5.51 292.00 35.28
S. No ActivityNo of trainee/ Units
Rates Total Amt (Rs) References Remark
1 Food and Logistics 50 50.00 2500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1 Per trainee/day
2 Honorium of Resource persons 4 150.00 600.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04
Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 8 4 lecture/ day
3 Literature and stationery 50 50.00 2500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11
Folder, Pen, dairy and study material
4 Venue charges, Tantages ets 1 800.00 800.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 10 Hall fair and mat
5 Photography & videography 1 500.00 500.00 Either soft/ hard copy
6 Miscellaneous charges 1 1100.00 1100.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 12
TOTAL 8000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of physical, financial and social audit
S. No ActivityNo of trainee/ Units
Rates Total Amt (Rs) References Remark
1 Food and Logistics 50 50.00 2500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1 Per trainee/day
2 Honorium of Resource persons 4 150.00 600.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04
Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 8 4 lecture/ day
3 Literature and stationery 50 50.00 2500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11
Folder, Pen, dairy and study material
4 Venue charges, Tantages ets 1 800.00 800.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 10 Hall fair and mat
5 Photography & videography 1 500.00 500.00 Either soft/ hard copy
6 Miscellaneous charges 1 1100.00 1100.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 12
TOTAL 8000.00
Detailed Estimate of Awareness Program
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No ActivityNo of
trainee/ Units
Rates Total Amt (Rs) References Remark
1 Food and Logistics 100 50.00 5000.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1 per trainee/day
2 Transportation charges 1 2000.00 2000.00 Jeep hired as per actual bill/day
3 Prabhat pheri through vehicles 2 1000.00 2000.00
4 Literature and stationery 100 50.00 5000.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11
Folder, Pen, dairy and study
material
5 Venue charges, Tantages ets 1 1500.00 1500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 10
Hall fair and mat
6 Photography & videography 1 1000.00 1000.00 Either soft/ hard copy
7 Water tanker for drinking 1 500.00 500.00
8 Kalajattha 1 2000.00 2000.00 Issue based entertainment
9 Miscellaneous charges 1 1000.00 1000.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 12
TOTAL 20000.00
Detailed Estimate of Institution Building
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No Activity No of trainee/ Units No of Days Rates Total Amt (Rs) References Remark
1 Food and Logistics 25 2 100.00 5000.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1 per trainee/day
2 Transportation charges 3 2 2000.00 12000.00 Jeep hired as per actual bill/day
3 Banner & extension materials 25 1 100.00 1000.00
4 Literature and stationery 25 1 150.00 3300.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11
Folder, Pen, dairy and study material
with Bag
5 Lodging and Boarding 25 1 300.00 7500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 10 Hall fair and mat
6 Photography & videography 1 2 500.00 1000.00 Either soft/ hard copy
7 Resource persons Charges 3 2 200.00 1200.00
8 Meeting with model beneficiry 1 2 2000.00 4000.00
TOTAL 35000.00
Detailed Estimate of Exposure visit [External]
A-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
Foundation For Ecological Security
S. No ActivityNo of
trainee/ Units
No of Days Rates Total Amt (Rs) References Remark
1 Food and Logistics 25 1 50.00 1250.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1
per trainee/day
2 Transportation charges 3 1 2000.00 6000.00 Jeep hired as per actual bill/day
3 Banner & extension materials 5 1 100.00 500.00
4 Literature and stationery 25 1 100.00 2500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11
Folder, Pen, dairy and
study material with
Bag5 Kalajattha 1 1 2000.00 2000.00
6 Photography & videography 1 1 1000.00 1000.00 Either soft/ hard copy
7 Resource persons Charges 3 1 200.00 600.008 Miscellaneus charges 1 1 1150.00 1150.00
TOTAL 15000.00
Detailed Estimate of Exposure visit Internal [Local]
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No ActivityNo of
trainee/ Units
Rates Total Amt (Rs) References Remark
1 Food and Logistics 25 100.00 2500.00Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1
Per trainee/day
2 Transportation charges 3 1500.00 4500.00 Jeep hired as per actual bill/day
3 Banner & extension materials 2 100.00 200.00
4 Literature and stationery 25 50.00 1250.00Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11
Folder, Pen, dairy and study material
with Bag5 Venue and Tantages 1 450.00 450.00
6 Photography & videography 1 500.00 500.00 Either soft/ hard copy
7 Resource persons Charges 3 200.00 600.00TOTAL 10000.00
Detailed Estimate of Field training
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No ActivityNo of
trainee/ Units
Rates Total Amt (Rs) References Remark
1 Food / Tea and Logistics 400 100.00 40000.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1 Per trainee/day
2 Transportation charges 3 1500.00 4500.00 Jeep hired as per actual bill/day
3 One day small truck hire charge for railly 1 1000.00 1000.00
4 Two days vehicle hire charges for rally 4 1000.00 4000.00
5 Banner & extension materials 10 250.00 2500.00
6 Literature and stationery 200 50.00 10000.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11
Folder, Pen, dairy and study material with Bag
7 Venue and Tantages 2 1000.00 2000.00
8 Photography & videography 1 2500.00 2500.00 Either soft/ hard copy
9 Kalajattha 2 2000.00 4000.0010 Water tanker for drinking 2 500.00 1000.00
11 Awards / Prizes for excellent padyatries 5 700.00 3500.00
TOTAL 75000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Padyatra / Campaign for two days
S. No Items Days of camp Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Medicine 1 6200.00 6200.00 As discussion with Department of Animal Husbandry
2 Resource person charges 4 200.00 800.003 Extension of program 1 2000.00 2000.004 Kalajattha 1 2000.00 2000.005 Food and logistics 1 7000.00 7000.006 Transportation 1 5000.00 5000.007 Tentages 1 1500.00 1500.00
TOTAL 24500.00
Detailed Estimate of Vatenary and Health Camp
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No ActivityNo of
trainee/ Units
Rates Total Amt (Rs) References Remark
1 Food and Logistics 50 50.00 2500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 1 Per trainee/day
2 Honorium of Resource persons 4 150.00 600.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04
Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 8 4 lecture/ day
3 Literature and stationery 50 50.00 2500.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 11
Folder, Pen, dairy and study material
4 Venue charges, Tantages ets 1 800.00 800.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 10 Hall fair and mat
5 Photography & videography 1 500.00 500.00 Either soft/ hard copy
6 Miscellaneous charges 1 1100.00 1100.00 Cir.No. 1147-1200 Dt 12.07.04 Dir WDSC Jaipur item No. 12
TOTAL 8000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of building capacity of SHGs
S. No Activity Unit Unit Rate Total Amt (Rs) References Remark
1 Wall paintings Per square fit 250 15.00 3750.00
2 Pamplets and Brocheures Per thousand copy 4 400.00 1600.00 Per thousand
3 Flex banners Per square fit 50 9.00 450.005 Photography & videography No. 2 500.00 1000.006 Miscellaneous charges 1 1200.00 1200.00
TOTAL 8000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Sinage,Wall painting and Boards
Sr.no Particulars Measurement Unit1 Bottom length 12 meters2 Bottom width 12 meters3 Top length 16 meters4 Top width 16 meters5 Depth 2 meters6 Side slope (V:H) of the bund 1:01 1
Sr.no Particulars Measurement Unit1 Average length 14 meters2 Average width 14 meters3 Depth 2 meters4 Volume 392 Cum
Sr.no Hydrologic data1 Runoff coefficient 112 Catchment area 13 Q ( cum) 0.354 storage capacity(cum) 392
Sr.no Particulars Percentage Length Width Depth Volume Unit1 Site clearance 100% 16 16 256.00 Sqm2 Excavation 100% 400.00 CumA Hard soil 15% 60.00 CumB moorum 20% 80.00 CumC Disintegrated rock 65% 260.00 Cum
Sr.no Particulars Unit Volume Rate Cost1 Site clearance cum 256.00 1.36 348.22 Excavation of hard soil cum 60.00 91.00 5460.03 Excavation of moorum cum 80.00 99.00 7920.04 Excavation of disintegrated rock cum 260.00 134.00 34840.06 Stone pitching at Bund sqm 36.00 195.00 7020.07 Stone slab on inlet sqm 20.00 195.00 3900.08 Transportation of Stone cum 12.88 390.00 5023.29 Soil Lift charge above 1.5 m cum 78.25 11.00 860.810 PVC Pipe(110mm dia.) for disposal of excess Water m 3.00 178.00 534.011 Grass seed
Stylohemata Kg. 3.00 55.00 165.0Dhaman Kg. 3.00 70.00 210.0
12 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. Rm 192.00 0.59 113.3FYM application on bundPurchasing of manure Kg. 480.00 2.00 960.0
14 Manure application on bund Rm 240.00 0.20 48.015 Tree seed
Subabul Kg. 1.00 18.00 18.0Neem Kg. 1.00 20.00 20.0
16Brick Work 75 mm thick on the inner face & base of the pond sqm 302.39 208.00 62897.5Total Cost 130337.9Contingency @ 3% 3910.1Grand Total 134248.0Estimated Costing Say Rs. 134200.0
Sr.no. Particular Quantiy Labour cost Skilled person cost
material cost Total Total
1 Site clearence 256 348.2 0.0 0.0 348.2 258.62 Excavation of hard soil 60.00 5022.0 438.0 0.0 5460.0 35740.03 Excavation of moorum 80.00 7200.0 720.0 0.0 7920.0 0.04 Excavation of disintegrated rock 260.00 32656.0 2184.0 0.0 34840.0 0.05 Stone Pitching on Bund 36.00 1458.0 2160.0 3402.0 7020.0 3240.06 Stone slab on inlet 20.00 810.0 1200.0 1890.0 3900.0 3900.07 Transportation of Stone 12.88 0.0 0.0 5023.2 5023.2 5023.28 Lift charges 78.25 860.8 0.0 0.0 860.8 626.09 PVC Pipe(110mm dia.) for disposal of excess Water 3.00 0.0 0.0 534.0 534.0 534.0
10 Grass seeding 6.00 0.0 0.0 375.0 375.0 488.311 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. 192.00 113.3 0.0 0.0 113.312 Purchasing of manure 480.00 0.0 960.0 960.0 960.013 FYM application on bund 240.00 0.0 48.0 48.0 48.014 Tree seeding 2.00 0.0 38.0 38.0 #REF!15 Brick Work 75 mm thick 302.39 6047.8 16329.2 40520.5 62897.5
Total Cost 54516.0 23031.2 52790.7 130337.9Contingencies, 3% 1635.5 690.9 1583.72 3910.14Total 134248.0
134200.0
As per BSR 2011- page-3, item no.22 b
As per BSR 2011- page-0, Sr.no.-45
As per BSR 2011- page-14, item no.145
13
Say Rs.
Local rateLocal rate As per BSR 2011- page-15, Item-157
Local rateLocal rate
Costing of Dugout Pond
BSR 2011- page-10. item-95BSR 2011- page-17, item-189(b)BSR 2011- page-17, item-189(c)
BSR 2011- page-1, item-3
Remarks
As per BSR 2011- page-17, Item-198BSR 2011- page-1, item-2(c)
As per BSR 2011- page-0, Item-9 As per BSR 2011- page-17, Item-198
Foundation For Ecological Security
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, IndiaMODEL ESTIMATE OF FARM POND
Quantity estimation
Dimention for construction & costing of Farm Pond
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
Wid
th
Length
Layout plan of Farm Pond
16m
12 mSide Slope 1:1
12 m
16m
Cross section of bund- 0.54 sqm 0.54 bw 1.5mt Ht 0.6 Mt TW 0.3mtTop Width 0.30
Length per Ha 150 Rmt Bottom Width 1.50Height 0.30
Labour Total Labour Total1 Dug belling work up to 5-7 cm depth (rate as
per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, item no. 156)300 Rm 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00
2 Earth work for construction of bund including ramming compaction and dressing up to the lead of 50m and lift 1.5 m
(a) Earth work in soft soil (50%) (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 188A)
40.50 Cum 77.00 77.00 3118.50 3118.50
(b) Earth work in hard soil (50%) Rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 188B)
40.50 Cum 85.00 85.00 3442.50 3442.50
3 Pipe Outlet construction (As per market Rate) 2 Rm 0.00 273.00 0.00 546.00
4 Grass seed 0.00 0.00
(a) Stylo hamata 4 Kg. 0.00 55.00 0.00 220.00
(b) Dhaman 4 Kg. 0.00 70.00 0.00 280.00
5 Sowing of seed on bunds 600 Rm 0.59 0.59 354.00 354.00
6 Supply of Saplings
(a) Karounda 75 No,s 0.00 4.00 0.00 300.00
(b) Alovera 75 No,s 0.00 4.00 0.00 300.00
7 Transportation cost of saplings from 50 kmdistance.(rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, itemno. 139 A & B)
150 No,s 0.20 8.64 29.40 1295.25
8 Pit digging (0.3mx0.3mx0.3m) (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, item no. 142 A )
150 No,s 1.80 1.80 270.00 270.00
Manure for plants
Purchasing of neem kake for pit treatment.7.5 Kg. 0.00 20.00 0.00 150.00
Purchasing of manure for pit treatment.375 Kg. 0.00 2.00 0.00 750.00
10 Manure application of plants (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, item no. 145)
150 No,s 0.27 0.27 40.50 40.50
11 Planting work of Saplings (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, item no. 147 B)
150 No,s 3.00 3.00 450.00 450.00
12 Two times watering to the plant with 15 litersper plant. (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, itemno. 148)
150 No,s 3.70 3.70 555.00 555.00
13Transportation Cost of water from 5 kmdistance. (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, itemno. 140A)
150 No,s 0.00 3.48 0.00 522.30
8559.90 12894.05386.82
13280.8713300.00
0.3
9
TotalAdd contingency @ 3%
Grand TotalSay amount
Foundation For Ecological SecurityIntegrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
Tehsil – Jahazpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, IndiaMODEL ESTIMATE FOR FARM BUNDING (Medbandi)
S.no. Item Quantity Unit Rate Amount
1:1 0.60 1:1
. 0.4 1.50.36
1.5 All dimensions are in meter
Sr.no Particulars Measurement Unit1 Bottom length 12 meters2 Bottom width 12 meters3 Top length 16 meters4 Top width 16 meters5 Depth 2 meters6 Side slope (V:H) of the bund 1:01 1
Sr.no Particulars Measurement Unit1 Average length 14 meters2 Average width 14 meters3 Depth 2 meters4 Volume 392 Cum
Sr.no Hydrologic data1 Runoff coefficient 112 Catchment area 13 Q ( cum) 0.354 storage capacity(cum) 392
Sr.no Particulars Percentage Length Width Depth Volume Unit1 Site clearance 100% 16 16 256.00 Sqm2 Excavation 100% 400.00 CumA Hard soil 15% 0.3 60.00 CumB moorum 20% 0.4 80.00 CumC Disintegrated rock 65% 1.3 260.00 Cum
Sr.no Particulars Unit Volume Rate Cost1 Site clearance cum 256.00 1.36 348.22 Excavation of hard soil cum 60.00 91.00 5460.03 Excavation of moorum cum 80.00 99.00 7920.04 Excavation of disintegrated rock cum 260.00 134.00 34840.05 Stone pitching at Bund sqm 28.80 195.00 5616.06 Stone slab on inlet sqm 18.00 195.00 3510.08 Soil Lift charge above 1.5 m cum 78.25 11.00 860.8
9PVC Pipe(110mm dia.) for disposal of excess Water m 3.00 178.00 534.0
10 Grass seedStylohemata Kg. 3.00 55.00 165.0Dhaman Kg. 3.00 70.00 210.0
11 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. Rm 192.00 0.59 113.312 FYM application on bund13 Purchasing of manure Kg. 480.00 2.00 960.014 Manure application on bund Rm 240.00 0.20 48.015 Tree seed
Subabul Kg. 1.00 18.00 18.0Neem Kg. 1.00 20.00 20.0Total Cost 60623.2Contingency @ 3% 1818.7Grand Total 62441.9Estimated Costing Say Rs. 62400
Sr.no. Particular Quantiy Labour cost Skilled person cost
material cost
Total Total
1 Site clearence 256 348.2 0.0 0.0 348.2 258.62 Excavation of hard soil 60.00 5022.0 438.0 0.0 5460.0 35740.03 Excavation of moorum 80.00 7200.0 720.0 0.0 7920.0 0.04 Excavation of disintegrated rock 260.00 32656.0 2184.0 0.0 34840.0 0.05 Stone Pitching on Bund 28.80 1166.4 1728.0 2721.6 5616.06 Stone slab on inlet 18.00 729.0 1080.0 1701.0 3510.0 3510.08 Lift charges 78.25 860.8 0.0 0.0 860.8 626.09 PVC Pipe(110mm dia.) for disposal of excess Water 3.00 0.0 0.0 534.0 534.0 534.0
10 Grass seeding 6.00 0.0 0.0 375.0 375.0 488.311 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. 192.00 113.3 0.0 0.0 113.312 Purchasing of manure 480.00 0.0 0.0 960.0 960.0 960.013 FYM application on bund 240.00 0.0 0.0 48.0 48.0 48.014 Tree seeding 2.00 0.0 0.0 38.0 38.0 #REF!
Total 48095.59 6150.00 6377.60 60623.19Contingencies, 3% 1442.9 184.5 191.3 1818.70Total 62441.9
62400
Local Rate
As per BSR 2011- page-0, Sr.no.-45
As per BSR 2011- page-14, item no.145
Say Rs
Local rateLocal rate
As per BSR 2011- page-15, Item-157
Local rateLocal rate
BSR 2011- page-1, item-3
Remarks
As per BSR 2011- page-17, Item-198BSR 2011- page-1, item-2(c)
As per BSR 2011- page-17, Item-198
Costing of Dugout Pond
BSR 2011- page-10. item-95BSR 2011- page-17, item-189(b)BSR 2011- page-17, item-189(c)
Foundation For Ecological Security
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India
MODEL ESTIMATE OF EARTHEN DUGOUT POND
Quantity estimation
Dimention for construction & costing of Farm Pond
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
Wid
th
Length
Layout plan of Farm Pond
16 m
12 mSide Slope 1:1
12 m
16 m
0.54 bw 1.5mt Ht 0.6 Mt TW 0.3mt3 Top Width 0.30
150 Rmt Bottom Width 1.50Height 0.30
Labour Total Labour Total1 Dug belling work up to 5-7 cm depth 300 Rm 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00
2 Earth work for construction of bund including ramming compaction and dressing up to the lead of 50m and lift 1.5 m
a Earth work in Hard soil (50%) (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 188A)
40.50 Cum 77.00 77.00 3118.50 3118.50
b Earth work in Murrum (50%) Rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 188B)
40.50 Cum 85.00 85.00 3442.50 3442.50
3 Stone Outlet construction (As per BSR 2011page no- 3 ,item no-24b)
0.81 Cum 273.00 706.00 221.13 571.86
4 Grass seeda Stylo hamata 6 Kg. 0.00 55.00 0.00 330.00b Dhaman 6 Kg. 0.00 70.00 0.00 420.005 Sowing of grass seed on bunds 600 Rm 0.59 0.59 354.00 354.0013 Tree Planting
Desibabul 0.1 Kg. 0.00 18.00 0.00 1.80Khakra(beutea) 0.3 Kg. 0.00 20.00 0.00 6.00
14 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. 150 Rm 0.59 0.59 88.50 88.5015 Ploughing by tractor cultivator and grass seed
broadcasting (seed rate 6 to 8 kgs/ha) cost ofseed not included (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no.15, item no.163) 0.80 Ha. 284.00 922.00 227.20 737.60Total 9370.76Add contingency @ 3% 281.12Grand Total 9651.88Say am 9700.00
0.3
Amount
Foundation For Ecological Security
UnitQuantity
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurTehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India
Cross section of Outlet- 0.27 sqm Length(M)Cross section of bund- 0.54 sqm
MODEL ESTIMATE FOR PASTURE DEVELOPMENT ON PRIVATE LAND
Length per Ha
ItemS.no. Rate
1:1 0.60
1:1
. 0.4 1.50.36
1.5 All dimentions are in meter
Name of Village :- Name of site :- Chragah Plot no. -1 ( )
Name of Work :- Pasture Land Development Work Jal Grahan Vikash Samiti
1.00 Ha. Area for trenching, Size of trench 0.45 mt. Depth 0.45 mt. Width50.0 Mt. Contour to contour intervals 0.2025 Sqm cross section area of trench
55 MM / Hr. Rainfall intensity of area 0.5 Hr. (Tc) duration 550.00 mm Av. rainfall25% Runoff co oficient Runoff arrested 60.00% 41.25 Cum. in one hectare
203.70 Mt. trenching length required in one hectare of land Say CCT/ha. 200.00 41.25 Cum. In this plot.70.00 Rmt. Length of thor fence per ha. No of thor sticks in one meter length 8.0010% Damaging due to transportation, rehandling and planting350 Plants to be planted in one hectare Say 350 30.53 5.5 x 5.5 mt. Spacing
0.75 Mt. Height of LBCD, Bottom width of LBCD3.5 Top width 0.5 Length of LBCD Mt.1.5 Sqm Cross section area of LBCD, No. of LBCD required per ha. 1.00 3.00
0.90 Mt. Depth of cattle protection trench, Top width 1.2 Bottom width0.90.945 Sqm cross section area of trench 70.00 Rmt. Length of cattle protection trench per ha.
S.no Particular Unit Quantity Rate Amount Quantity Rate Amount Quantity Rate Amount 1 Dug belling work up to 5 to 7 cm depth. Rmt. 140 1 140.002 Excavation of cattle protection trench Cum 66.15a Excavation of cattle protection trench in hard soil 20%. Cum 13.23 91 1203.93
bExcavation of cattle protection trench in Ordinary murram 40%.
Cum 26.46 99 2619.54
c Excavation of cattle protection trench in Disintigreted rock 40%. Cum 26.46 134 3545.643 Supply and cutting of 80 cm thor sticks. Per 100 stick 6 174 1071.84 1.54 174 267.96
4Transportation cost of thor sticks through bullock cart from 5 kmdistance, loading & unloading. Per 100 stick 6 100 616.00 1.54 100 154
5 Rehandling work of thor sticks up to 200 to 500mt distance. Per 100 stick 6 76.5 471.24 1.54 76.5 117.816 Planting of Thor sticks. Rmt. 140 6.93 970.20 35 6.93 242.557 Layout ( by A-farm or dumpy level) for contouring. Rmt. 200 0.31 62.008 Dug belling work up to 5 to 7 cm depth for contouring. Rmt. 200 0.74 148.0030% CCT Excavation in 30 % hard soil for trenching. Cum 12.15 75.00 911.2570% CCT Excavation in 70 % ordinary murram for trenching. Cum 28.35 99.00 2806.6530% Pit digging in hard soil of size 45x45x45 Cm. Cum 105 6.8 714.00 26.25 6.8 178.5 15.75 5.5 86.62570% Pit digging in moorm soil of size 45x45x45 Cm. Cum 245 13.4 3283.00 61.25 13.4 820.75 36.75 9.9 363.825
11 Treatment of pit by FYM. Per pit 350 0.27 94.50 87.5 0.27 23.625 52.5 0.2 10.5Purchasing of neem cake for pit treatment. Kg. 35 20.00 700.00Purchasing of manure for pit treatment. Kg. 1750 2.00 3500.00
12 Cost of saplings Per plant 350 4.00 1400.00 87.5 4.0 350 52.5 4.0 21013 Plantation work Per pit 350 3.00 1050.00 87.5 3.0 262.5 52.5 3.0 157.514 Transportation Cost of saplings from 40 km distance. Per 1000 Plant 0.35 5035.0 1762.25 0.0875 5035.0 440.5625 0.0525 5035.0 264.3375
15Ring making of 0.5 Mt. Radius & 30 Cm. width X 20 Cm. Depth. Per plant 350 2.40 840.00 87.5 2.40 210.00 52.50 2.40 126.00
A Two times watering to the plant with 15 liters per plant. Per plant 350 3.70 1295.00 87.5 3.70 323.75 52.50 3.70 194.25B Transportation Cost of water from 10 km distance. Per 1000 Plant 0.35 3056.00 1069.60 0.0875 3056.0 267.40 0.05 3056.0 160.4417 Interculture operation. Per plant 350 1.20 420.00 87.5 1.2 105.00 52.50 1.2 63.00
18Ploughing by tractor cultivator and grass seed broadcasting(seed rate 6 to 8 kgs/ha) cost of seed not included Ha. 0.75 845.00 633.75 0.1875 845.0 158.44 0.11 845.0 95.06
50% Stylo hamata Kg. 6 55.00 330.0050% Dhaman Kg. 6 70.00 420.00
19Making pallets of mixture of fine soil, grass seed, manure etc(seed rate 6 to 8 kgs/ha) cost of seed not included Kg. 12.00 18.90 226.80
20 Tree seedDeshibabool Kg. 0.30 18.00 5.40
Khakhra Kg. 1.00 20.00 20.00Neem Kg. 0.70 20.00 14.00
21 Sowing of tree seed on ridges. Rmt. 270.00 0.59 159.30
23Loose boulder check dam in side the plot.(per Ha. One LBCD)(As per BSR 2011 page no- 3 ,item no-24b) Cum 4.5 706.00 3177.00
Rs.35,680.89 Sub total 3140.525 Sub total 2513.86Rs.41,335.28Rs.1,240.06
Grand Total Rs.42,575Rs.42,600
Third Year
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed Jahajpur
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India
Costing & Quantity Estimation of Pasture Land Development
First Year
Contingency 3%
Total cost of pasture land development
Total Cost
second Year
UnitLabour Total Labour Total
1 Dug belling work for CCT up to 5-7 cm depth (As per BSR 2011, P.no. 14, item no. 156)
300 Rm 1 1 300.0 300.0
2 Lay out By A- Frame (As per BSR 2011, P.no. 14, item no. 155(a))
300 Rm 0.31 0.31 93.0 93.0
3 Excavation of hard soil for CCT (As perBSR 2011, P.no. 17, item no. 188 b)40%
24.3 Cum 85 85 2065.5 2065.5
4 Excavation of murram for CCT (As perBSR 2011, P.no. 17, item no. 189 c) 60%
36.5 Cum 99 99 3608.6 3608.6
5 grass seeding on bundDhaman 3 Kg. 0 70 0.0 210.0
Stylo hamata 3 Kg. 0 55 0.0 165.06 Sowing of Grass seed on bund 600 Rm 0.59 0.59 354.0 354.0
Sub-Total 6421.05 6796.05Contingency @ 3% 203.9Grand Total 6999.9
Says Rs 7000.0
Amount
MODEL ESTIMATE OF CCTTotal length of CCT per ha =300 rm/ha
CX= 0.2025 CumQuantityItemS.no. Rate
GPS Position Latitude :-GPS Position Longitude :-Name of Village Institution :-
Name of Work :-
A-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India
Foundation For Ecological Security
Name of site :- Name of Village :-
12 Tw - 2m Ht. - 2 m Bw - 10 m
110
Labour Total Labour Total1 Total e/w excavation for bund 1320 Cum2 Earth work in soft soil for
construction of bund includingramming compaction and dressing upto the lead of 50m and lift 1.5 m(Asper BSR2011, P.no. 17, item no.188A)
264 Cum 77 77 20328 20328
3 Earth work in hard soil forconstruction of bund includingramming compaction and dressing upto the lead of 50m and lift 1.5 m(Asper BSR2011, P.no. 17, item no.188B)
528 Cum 85 85 44880 44880
4 Earth work in Murrum Mixed soil forconstruction of bund includingramming compaction and dressing upto the lead of 50m and lift 1.5 m(Asper BSR2011, P.no. 17, item no.189C)
528 Cum 99 99 52272 52272
5 Extra lift charge Above 1.50 m height(As per BSR2011, P.no. 1, item no. 3)
792 Cum 11 11 8712 8712
6 Pitching at the upstream face of bundwill be provided as per BSR 2011page no-17 ,item no-198
120 Sqm 100.5 195 12060 23400
7 Grass seedDhaman 40.0 Kg. 0 70.0 0 2800Sowing of Grass Seeds on bund 660.0 Rm 0.59 0.59 389.4 389.4
8 Manual ramming for bund (As perBSR 2010, P.no.17, item no. 199(a) )
660 Cum 14.2 14.2 9372 9372
Total 148013.4 162153.44864.602
167018.00167000.00
2 m
D/S 1:1.5 U/S 1:2.5
10 m
ItemS.no. Quantity
Foundation for Ecological Security
Tehsil - Jahazpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, IndiaType of structure :- Nadi
Contingency @ 3%Grand Total
Say Rs.
Length of bund -m
RateUnit
IWMP Watershed Jahajpur
Amount
Side slope(V:H)- D/S-1:1.5 , U/S-1:2.5
Cross section of bund- sqmMODEL ESTIMATE FOR NADI
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1 M.Length of Crest 16 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.5 M. 1.3 M.
1.3 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 5.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.3 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.0 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 2.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 4.0 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.3 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.
Total 300.002
250 X 6.0 = 300 Sqm.
3
2 50 x 6 x 0.15 = 90
Total 90 Cum.4
2 50 4 2 800 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 1 X 16 X 2.7 X 1.5 = 64.80H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 1.2 X 2.0 = 24.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.5 = 12.00 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 3.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 16 X 2.0 X 0.75 = 24.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16 X 0.30 X 0.8 = 3.60 Cum.
Total 131.401 30% 39.422 60% 78.843 10% 13.14
Name of VillageName of Site
0Near Devnarayan Temple
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Item
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soil
Earth work filling behind foundation dry ormoist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.Breaking of clods dressing to require profilewith manual compaction including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no.
Execavation in Murrum
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
Width of Apron =
contd..
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
6
H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 2.7 X 0.3 = 12.96 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5 X 1.2 X 0.3 = 3.60 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 1.20 Cum.Apron 1 X 16.0 X 2.0 X 0.3 = 9.60 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 1.44 Cum.
Total 31.207
H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 2.5 X 1.2 = 48.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 1.2 X 1.7 = 20.40 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 9.60 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.5 = 1.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 1.08 Cum.
Total 80.88 Cum.8
H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 1.9 X 1 = 30.40 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 0.8 X 2.3 = 18.40 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 1.80 = 11.52 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.3 = 5.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.72 Cum.
Total 66.24 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 16.0 X 2.0 X 0.30 9.60 Cum.Total 9.60 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 1.3 X 0.1 = 2.08 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.30 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.24 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.48 Cum.Apron 1 X 16.0 X 2.0 X 0.15 = 4.80 Cum.
Total 8.10 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 16.0 X 1.6 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 4.7 = 75.20H.W.Ext. 2 X 5.0 X 2.9 = 29.00S.S 2 X 4.0 X 2.9 = 23.20W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.9 = 7.60T.W. 2 X 16.0 X 0.2 = 4.80
Total = 139.8013
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1 M.Length of Crest 89 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.4 M. 1.8 M.
1.7 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 15.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 1.0 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 0.6 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 1.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 1.0 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.8 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
0 50 6 0.00 Sqm.
Total 0.002
2 40 X 1.0 = 40 Sqm.
3
2 40 x 1 x 0.15 = 12
Total 12 Cum.
4(a)4(b)
2 100 4 2 1600 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 0 X 89 X 2.6 X 1.5 = 0.00H.W.Ext 2 X 15.0 X 0.6 X 0.75 = 13.50 Cum.S.W. 0 X 1.0 X 1.00 X 1.50 = 0.00 Cum.W.W. 0 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 0.00 Cum.Apron 0 X 89 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 0 X 89 X 0.30 X 0.75 = 0.00 Cum.
Total 13.501 30% 4.052 60% 8.103 10% 1.35
Name of VillageName of Site
TaswariyaNear Devkaran Regar Farm
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 18of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soilExecavation in Murrum
Earth work for bund manking & filling behind foundation dry or moist soil including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking of clods dressing to require profile with manual compaction including intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 of G.K.N.2011 BSR )
Earth work for including intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 of G.K.N.2011 BSR )
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
Width of Apron =
Item
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
6
H.W. 0 X 89.0 X 2.6 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 15 X 0.6 X 0.3 = 5.40 Cum.S.W. 0 X 1 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.W.W. 0 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.Apron 0 X 89.0 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 0 X 89.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.
Total 5.407
H.W. 0 X 89.0 X 2.4 X 1.2 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 15.0 X 0.6 X 0.7 = 12.60 Cum.S.W. 0 X 1.0 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 0.00 Cum.W.W. 0 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.5 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 0 X 89.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 0.00 Cum.
Total 12.60 Cum.8
H.W. 0 X 89.0 X 2.1 X 1 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 15.0 X 0.6 X 1.0 = 18.00 Cum.S.W. 0 X 1.0 X 0.8 X 1.40 = 0.00 Cum.W.W. 0 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.8 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 0 X 89.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.00 Cum.
Total 18.00 Cum.9
Apron 0 X 89.0 X 1.0 X 0.30 0.00 Cum.Total 0.00 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 89.0 X 1.7 X 0.1 = 15.13 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 15.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.90 Cum.S.W. 2 X 15.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.90 Cum.W.W. 0 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 0 X 89.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.00 Cum.Apron 0 X 89.0 X 1.0 X 0.15 = 0.00 Cum.
Total 16.93 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 89.0 X 1.2 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 89.0 X 3.7 = 329.30H.W.Ext. 2 X 15.0 X 2.6 = 78.00S.W. 2 X 15.0 X 1.7 = 51.00W.W. 0 X 2.0 X 2.4 = 0.00T.W. 0 X 89.0 X 0.2 = 0.00
Total = 458.3013
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
contd..
:-:-
Quatity Unit
Labour Total Labour Total
1
0.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
2
40 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 54.40 54.403
12 Cum. 85.00 85.00 1020.00 1020.004(b)
1600.00 Cum. 91.00 91.00 145600.00 145600.005
13.50 Cum. 0.00 0.004.05 Cum. 91.00 91.00 368.55 368.558.10 Cum. 99.00 99.00 801.90 801.901.35 Cum. 134.00 134.00 180.90 180.90
6
5.40 Cum. 318 1643 1717.20 8872.20
7
12.60 Cum. 342 1252 4309.20 15775.208
18.00 Cum. 342 1252 6156.00 22536.009
0.00 Cum. 342 1252 0.00 0.0010
16.93 Cum. 312 2694 5282.16 45609.4211 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0.00 0.0012
458.30 Sqm. 65.7 138 30110.31 63245.4013
0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00195600.6 304064.0
9121.9313185.9
1.961.183.13
Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)
Grand Total
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 18 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work for bund manking & filling behindfoundation dry or moist soil including laying inlayer of 15cm. Breaking of clods dressing torequire profile with manual compaction includingintial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As peritem no. 5 page 1 of G.K.N.2011 BSR )
Contingency charges @ 3%
Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Murrum
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
SubTotal
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per itemNo. 2(c) Page no.-1&item no. 189 (b),(c) page no.-17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Abstract of Cost of Anicut
Name of VillageName of Site
TaswariyaNear Devkaran Regar Farm
Item
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Rate Amount
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
S.No.
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 5.400 17.28 2.54 5.08 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 458.300 114.58 14.67 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 30.600 42.84 13.10 _ 33.664 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 16.93 98.87 7.62 15.246 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 273.57 37.92 20.31 33.66 Say Bags 274 S.No Rate Amount
or 13.70 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 13 1100 14739
1 Cement 13.7 MT. 3 Stones 12 850 101102 Sand 37.92 Cum. 4 Aggregates 7 700 50243 Stones 33.66 Cum. 5 Cement 274 210 575404 Aggregates 20.31 Cum. 87413
S.No.
Tractor trip
Total Amount
ITEM
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village :-Name of Site :-
TaswariyaNear Devkaran Regar Farm
Material Statement
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1.2 M.Length of Crest 18 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.4 M. 1.8 M.
1.2 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 8.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 3.0 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.4 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 2.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 4.0 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.8 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
1 20 0.8 16.00 Sqm.
Total 16.002
0100 X 6.0 = 0 Sqm.
3
0 100 x 6 x 0.15 = 0
Total 0 Cum.4
1 20 3.5 2.5 175 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 0 X 18 X 2.6 X 1.5 = 0.00H.W.Ext 1 X 20.0 X 0.8 X 1.0 = 16.00 Cum.S.W. 1 X 8.0 X 1.00 X 1.0 = 8.00 Cum.W.W. 1 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 1.50 Cum.Apron 0 X 18 X 2.0 X 0.75 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 0 X 18 X 0.30 X 0.8 = 0.00 Cum.
Total 25.501 30% 7.652 60% 15.303 10% 2.55
Name of VillageName of Site
GandherGandher (Near Farm of Dhannalal Ji Dhakad)
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 18of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soilExecavation in Murrum
Earth work for desiltation of the structure to enhance its storage capacity including intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 189 (a&b) page 17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
Width of Apron =
Item
contd..
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
6
H.W. 0 X 18.0 X 2.6 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 1 X 20 X 0.8 X 0.3 = 4.80 Cum.S.W. 1 X 8 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.W.W. 1 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 0.60 Cum.Apron 0 X 18.0 X 2.0 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 0 X 18.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.
Total 7.807
H.W. 0 X 18.0 X 2.4 X 1.2 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 20.0 X 0.8 X 0.7 = 22.40 Cum.S.W. 2 X 8.0 X 1.00 X 0.7 = 11.20 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.45 = 1.80 Cum.T.W. 0 X 18.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 0.00 Cum.
Total 35.40 Cum.8
H.W. 0 X 18.0 X 1.8 X 1.2 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 1 X 20.0 X 0.8 X 2.0 = 32.00 Cum.S.W. 1 X 8.0 X 1 X 2.60 = 20.80 Cum.W.W. 1 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.0 = 2.00 Cum.T.W. 0 X 18.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.00 Cum.
Total 54.80 Cum.9
Apron 0 X 18.0 X 2.0 X 0.30 0.00 Cum.Total 0.00 Cum.
10
H.W. 0 X 18.0 X 1.2 X 0.1 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 1 X 20.0 X 0.8 X 0.05 = 0.80 Cum.S.W. 1 X 8.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.40 Cum.W.W. 1 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.10 Cum.T.W. 0 X 18.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.00 Cum.Apron 0 X 18.0 X 2.0 X 0.15 = 0.00 Cum.
Total 1.30 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 18.0 X 1.7 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 40.0 X 2.5 = 100.00H.W.Ext. 1 X 20.0 X 4.0 = 80.00S.W. 1 X 7.2 X 2.6 = 18.72W.W. 1 X 2.0 X 2.0 = 4.00T.W. 0 X 18.0 X 0.2 = 0.00
Total = 202.7213
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
:-:-
Quatity Unit
Labour Total Labour Total
1
16.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 16.00 16.00
2
0 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 0.00 0.003
0 Cum. 85.00 85.00 0.00 0.00
4
87.5 Cum. 85 85 7437.50 7437.50
87.5 Cum. 91.0 91.0 7962.50 7962.505
25.50 Cum. 0.00 0.007.65 Cum. 91.00 91.00 696.15 696.15
15.30 Cum. 99.00 99.00 1514.70 1514.702.55 Cum. 134.00 134.00 341.70 341.70
6
7.80 Cum. 318 1643 2480.40 12815.40
7
35.40 Cum. 342 1252 12106.80 44320.808
54.80 Cum. 342 1252 18741.60 68609.609
0.00 Cum. 342 1252 0.00 0.0010
1.30 Cum. 312 2694 405.60 3502.2011 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0.00 0.0012
202.72 Sqm. 65.7 138 13318.70 27975.3613
0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.0065021.65 175191.91
5255.76180447.67
0.651.151.80
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Rate Amount
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
S.No.
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per itemNo. 2(c) Page no.-1&item no. 189 (b),(c) page no.-17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Abstract of Cost of Anicut
Name of VillageName of Site
GandherNear Farm of Dhannalal ji Dhakad
Item
Contingency charges @ 3%
Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Murrum
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
SubTotal
Grand Total
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 18 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work for desiltation of the structure toenhance its storage capacity including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 189(a&b) page 17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 7.800 24.96 3.67 7.33 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 202.720 50.68 6.49 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 90.200 126.28 38.61 _ 99.224 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 1.30 7.59 0.59 1.176 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 209.51 49.34 8.50 99.22 Say Bags 210 S.No Rate Amount
or 10.50 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 17 1100 19180
1 Cement 10.5 MT. 3 Stones 35 850 298012 Sand 49.34 Cum. 4 Aggregates 3 700 21033 Stones 99.22 Cum. 5 Cement 210 210 441004 Aggregates 8.50 Cum. 95184
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village :-Name of Site :-
GandherNear Farm of Dhannalal ji Dhakad
Material Statement
S.No.
Tractor trip
Total Amount
ITEM
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 2.5 M.Length of Crest 43 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 0.0 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 0.0 M. 2.2 M.
0.3 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 0.9 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 0.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 0.9 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 0.0 M. 0.30 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.0 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 0.0 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 0.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 7.0 M. 4.2 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 0.30 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 2.2 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.0 M.
S.No. No L B H1
0 50 6 0.00 Sqm.
Total 0.002
0 50 X 6.0 = 300 Sqm.
3
0 50 x 6 x 0.15 = 0
Total 0 Cum.4
1 60 40 1 2400 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 0 X 43 X 0.2 X 0.0 = 0.00H.W.Ext 0 X 0.0 X 0.2 X 0.0 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 1 X 7.0 X 1.00 X 3.0 = 21.00 Cum.W.W. 1 X 0.0 X 0.9 X 0.75 = 0.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 0 X 4.2 X 0.75 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 0 X 0.30 X 0.8 = 0.00 Cum.
Total 21.001 30% 6.302 60% 12.603 10% 2.10
contd..
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Width of Apron =
Item
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2010 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soilExecavation in Murrum
Earth work for desiltation of the structure to enhance its storage capacity including intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 189 (a&b) page 17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per item no.2,(b&c) page 1,& item.No.189(c) page-17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of VillageName of Site
GandherGandher Kekri Jane Wale Road ka pas (bhil ke Kuye ke pass)
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2010 BSR of
6
H.W. 1 X 0.0 X 0.2 X 0.2 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 0 X 0.2 X 0.2 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 9.5 X 1.00 X 0.2 = 3.80 Cum.W.W. 2 X 0 X 0.0 X 0.2 = 0.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 43.0 X 3.0 X 0.3 = 38.70 Cum.T.W. 1 X 43.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 3.87 Cum.
Total 46.377
H.W. 1 X 0.0 X 0.0 X 0.0 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 0.0 X 0.2 X 0.0 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 9.5 X 0.45 X 0.8 = 6.84 Cum.W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.0 X 0.5 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 43.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 2.90 Cum.
Total 9.74 Cum.8
H.W. 1 X 0.0 X 0.2 X 2.5 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 0.0 X 0 X 0.0 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 9.5 X 0.2 X 4.50 = 12.83 Cum.W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.9 X 2.2 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 43.0 X 0.30 X 0.30 = 3.87 Cum.
Total 16.70 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 43.0 X 3.0 X 0.30 38.70 Cum.Total 38.70 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 0.0 X 0.3 X 0.1 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 0.0 X 0.0 X 0.05 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 9.5 X 0.0 X 0.05 = 0.00 Cum.W.W. 2 X 0.0 X 0.9 X 0.05 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 43.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 1.29 Cum.Apron 1 X 43.0 X 3.0 X 0.15 = 19.35 Cum.
Total 20.64 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 0.0 X 2.5 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 0.0 X 6.2 = 0.00H.W.Ext. 2 X 0.0 X 0.6 = 0.00S.W 2 X 7.0 X 0.6 = 8.40W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 2.8 = 11.20T.W. 2 X 43.0 X 0.3 = 25.80
Total = 45.4013
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2010 BSR of
:-:-
Quatity UnitLabour Total
1 Labour Amount Total Amount
0.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
2
300 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 408.00 408.003
0 Cum. 85.00 85.00 0.00 0.004
1200.00 cum 75.00 75.00 90000.00 90000.00
1200.00 Cum. 91.00 91.00 109200.00 109200.005
21.00 Cum. 0.00 0.006.30 Cum. 91.00 91.00 573.30 573.30
12.60 Cum. 99.00 99.00 1247.40 1247.402.10 Cum. 134.00 134.00 281.40 281.40
6
46.37 Cum. 318 1643 14745.66 76185.91
7
9.74 Cum. 342 1252 3331.94 12197.618
16.70 Cum. 342 1252 5709.69 20902.149
38.70 Cum. 342 1252 13235.40 48452.4010
20.64 Cum. 312 2694 6439.68 55604.1611 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0.00 0.0012
45.40 Sqm. 65.7 138 2982.78 6265.2013
0.00 Cum. 0 0 0.00 0.00248155.25 421317.52
12639.53433957.05
2.481.864.34
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Rate Amount
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2010 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
S.No.
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per item no. 2,(b&c) page 1,&item.No.189(c) page-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Abstract of Cost of Anicut
Name of VillageName of Site
00
Item
Contingency charges @ 3%Total
Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Murrum
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Grand Total
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work for desiltation of the structure toenhance its storage capacity including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 189(a&b) page 17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 46.370 148.38 21.79 43.59 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 45.400 11.35 1.45 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 65.138 91.19 27.88 _ 71.654 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 20.64 120.54 9.29 18.586 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 371.46 60.41 62.16 71.65 Say Bags 372 S.No Rate Amount
or 18.60 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 21 1250 26684
1 Cement 18.6 MT. 3 Stones 25 1200 303822 Sand 60.41 Cum. 4 Aggregates 22 1700 373423 Stones 71.65 Cum. 5 Cement 372 215 799804 Aggregates 62.16 Cum. 174389
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village :-Name of Site :-
GandherGandher Kekri Jane Wale Road ka pas (bhil ke Kuye ke pass)
Material Statement
S.No.
Tractor trip
Total Amount
ITEM
:-:-
Quatity Unit
Labour Total Labour Total
1
66.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 66.00 66.00
2
0 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 0.00 0.003
0 Cum. 85.00 85.00 0.00 0.00
4
1000 Cum. 85.00 85.00 85000.0 85000.0
1000 Cum. 91.00 91.00 91000.0 91000.05
39.60 Cum. 0.00 0.0011.88 Cum. 91.00 91.00 1081.08 1081.0823.76 Cum. 99.00 99.00 2352.24 2352.243.96 Cum. 134.00 134.00 530.64 530.64
6
19.80 Cum. 318 1643 6296.40 32531.40
7
0.90 Cum. 342 1252 307.80 1126.808
1.80 Cum. 342 1252 615.60 2253.609
18.00 Cum. 342 1252 6156.00 22536.0010
15.11 Cum. 312 2694 4714.16 40704.9911 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0.00 0.0012
133.40 Sqm. 65.7 138 8764.38 18409.2013
0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00206884.30 297591.95
8927.76306519.71
2.071.003.07
Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)
Grand Total
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 18 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work for desiltation of the structure toenhance its storage capacity including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 189(a&b) page 17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Contingency charges @ 3%
Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Murrum
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
SubTotal
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per itemNo. 2(c) Page no.-1&item no. 189 (b),(c) page no.-17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Abstract of Cost of Anicut
Name of VillageName of Site
TaswariyaNear Devkaran Regar Farm
Item
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Rate Amount
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
S.No.
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1.2 M.Length of Crest 18 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.4 M. 1.8 M.
1.2 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 8.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 3.0 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.4 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 2.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 4.0 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.8 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
1 20 3.3 66.00 Sqm.
Total 66.002
00 X 6.0 = 0 Sqm.
3
0 100 x 6 x 0.15 = 0
Total 0 Cum.4
1 40 50 1 2000 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 0 X 18 X 2.6 X 1.5 = 0.00H.W.Ext 0 X 8.0 X 1.6 X 2.0 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 0 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.5 = 0.00 Cum.W.W. 0 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 0.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 20 X 3.0 X 0.60 = 36.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20 X 0.3 X 0.60 = 3.60 Cum.
Total 39.601 30% 11.882 60% 23.763 10% 3.96
Name of VillageName of Site
TaswariyaNear Devkaran Regar Farm
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 18of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soilExecavation in Murrum
Earth work for desiltation of the structure to enhance its storage capacity including intial lift up to 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 189 (a&b) page 17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
Width of Apron =
Item
contd..
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
6
H.W. 0 X 18.0 X 2.6 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 0 X 8 X 1.6 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 0 X 4 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.W.W. 0 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 0.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 20.0 X 3.0 X 0.3 = 18.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 1.80 Cum.
Total 19.807
H.W. 0 X 18.0 X 2.4 X 1.2 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 0 X 8.0 X 1.6 X 1.7 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 0 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 0.00 Cum.W.W. 0 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.5 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.15 X 0.3 = 0.90 Cum.
Total 0.90 Cum.8
H.W. 0 X 18.0 X 1.8 X 1.2 = 0.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 0 X 8.0 X 0.975 X 3.0 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 0 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 2.40 = 0.00 Cum.W.W. 0 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.8 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.30 X 0.30 = 1.80 Cum.
Total 1.80 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 3.0 X 0.30 18.00 Cum.Total 18.00 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2.30 X 0.1 = 4.60 Cum.H.W.Ext 0 X 8.0 X 0.60 X 0.05 = 0.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 10.7 X 0.85 X 0.05 = 0.91 Cum.W.W. 0 X 2.0 X 1.00 X 0.05 = 0.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.60 Cum.Apron 1 X 20.0 X 3.0 X 0.15 = 9.00 Cum.
Total 15.11 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 20.0 X 1.697 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 4.3 = 86.00H.W.Ext. 0 X 0.0 X 3.6 = 0.00S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 3.6 = 28.80W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 2.4 = 9.60T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.5 = 9.00
Total = 133.4013
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 19.800 63.36 9.31 18.61 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 133.400 33.35 4.27 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 20.700 28.98 8.86 _ 22.774 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 15.11 88.24 6.80 13.606 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 213.93 29.23 32.21 22.77 Say Bags 214 S.No Rate Amount
or 10.70 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 10 1100 11363
1 Cement 10.7 MT. 3 Stones 8 850 68392 Sand 29.23 Cum. 4 Aggregates 11 700 79673 Stones 22.77 Cum. 5 Cement 214 210 449404 Aggregates 32.21 Cum. 71109
S.No.
Tractor trip
Total Amount
ITEM
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village :-Name of Site :-
TaswariyaNear Devkaran Regar Farm
Material Statement
:-:-
Quatity Unit
Labour Total
1Labour Amount
Total Amount
300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00
2
180 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 244.80 244.803
54 Cum. 85.00 85.00 4590.00 4590.004
480.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 17760.00 17760.005
220.50 Cum. 0.00 0.0066.15 Cum. 91.00 91.00 6019.65 6019.65
132.30 Cum. 99.00 99.00 13097.70 13097.7022.05 Cum. 134.00 134.00 2954.70 2954.70
6
48.00 Cum. 318 1643 15264.00 78864.00
7
148.35 Cum. 342 1252 50735.70 185734.208
181.10 Cum. 342 1252 61936.20 226737.209
12.00 Cum. 342 1252 4104.00 15024.0010
10.10 Cum. 312 2694 3151.20 27209.4011 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0.00 0.0012
248.20 Sqm. 65.7 138 16306.74 34251.6013
0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00196464.69 612787.25
18383.62631170.87
1.964.356.31
Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)
Grand Total
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work filling behind foundation dry or moistsoil including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking ofclods dressing to require profile with manualcompaction including intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Contingency charges @ 3%Total
Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Murrum
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per itemNo. 2(c) Page no.-1&item no. 189 (b),(c) page no.-17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Abstract of Cost of Anicut
Name of VillageName of Site
0Near Well
Item
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Rate Amount
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
S.No.
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1.8 M.Length of Crest 20 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 3.0 M. 1.7 M.
1.2 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 10.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 3.5 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.6 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 2.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 5.0 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.7 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.
Total 300.002
230 X 6.0 = 180 Sqm.
3
2 30 x 6 x 0.15 = 54
Total 54 Cum.4
2 30 4 2 480 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 1 X 20 X 3.2 X 1.5 = 96.00H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 1.8 X 2.0 = 72.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 5.0 X 1.00 X 1.5 = 15.00 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 3.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 20 X 2.0 X 0.75 = 30.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20 X 0.30 X 0.8 = 4.50 Cum.
Total 220.501 30% 66.152 60% 132.303 10% 22.05
Name of VillageName of Site
0Near Well
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soil
Earth work filling behind foundation dry ormoist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.Breaking of clods dressing to require profilewith manual compaction including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no.
Execavation in Murrum
Width of Apron =
Item
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
contd..
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
6
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 3.2 X 0.3 = 19.20 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10 X 1.8 X 0.3 = 10.80 Cum.S.W. 2 X 5 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 3.00 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 1.20 Cum.Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.0 X 0.3 = 12.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 1.80 Cum.
Total 48.007
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 3.0 X 1.2 = 72.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 1.8 X 1.7 = 61.20 Cum.S.W. 2 X 5.0 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 12.00 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.5 = 1.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 1.35 Cum.
Total 148.35 Cum.8
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2.1 X 1.8 = 75.60 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 1.1 X 3.5 = 77.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 5.0 X 0.8 X 2.60 = 20.80 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.7 = 6.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.90 Cum.
Total 181.10 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.0 X 0.30 12.00 Cum.Total 12.00 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 1.2 X 0.1 = 2.40 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.60 Cum.S.W. 2 X 5.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.30 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.60 Cum.Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.0 X 0.15 = 6.00 Cum.
Total 10.10 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 20.0 X 2.5 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 5.5 = 110.00H.W.Ext. 2 X 10.0 X 4.1 = 82.00S.S 2 X 5.0 X 4.1 = 41.00W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 2.3 = 9.20T.W. 2 X 20.0 X 0.2 = 6.00
Total = 248.2013
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
:-:-
Ac
10 20.0 10
H.W.Ext.H.W. 1.2
1.0c
S.W.0.6
B 5.0 B
APRON 2
1.2T.W. 0.3
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
PLAN AND SECTION OF ANICUT
Name of Village 0
0.6
Name of Site
1.80
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Near Well
W.W .
W.W
PLAN2A
PLAN
1.7
1.2
1.8
1.7
0.153
1.50.3
SECTION ON A-A'
0.6
3.5
B.L.1
1.5
C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
3.5
BED LEVEL
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 48.000 153.60 22.56 45.12 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 248.200 62.05 7.94 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 341.450 478.03 146.14 _ 375.604 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 10.10 58.98 4.55 9.096 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 752.66 181.19 54.21 375.60 Say Bags 753 S.No Rate Amount
or 37.65 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 64 1100 70426
1 Cement 37.65 MT. 3 Stones 133 850 1128112 Sand 181.19 Cum. 4 Aggregates 19 700 134093 Stones 375.60 Cum. 5 Cement 753 210 1581304 Aggregates 54.21 Cum. 354776
S.No.
Tractor trip
Total Amount
ITEM
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village :-Name of Site :-
0Near Well
Material Statement
:-:-
Quatity Unit
Labour Total
1Labour Amount
Total Amount
300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00
2
240 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 326.40 326.403
72 Cum. 85.00 85.00 6120.00 6120.004
640.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 23680.00 23680.005
176.95 Cum. 0.00 0.0053.09 Cum. 91.00 91.00 4830.74 4830.74
106.17 Cum. 99.00 99.00 10510.83 10510.8317.70 Cum. 134.00 134.00 2371.13 2371.13
6
39.30 Cum. 318 1643 12497.40 64569.90
7
115.92 Cum. 342 1252 39642.93 145125.588
118.18 Cum. 342 1252 40417.56 147961.369
10.80 Cum. 342 1252 3693.60 13521.6010
8.78 Cum. 312 2694 2739.36 23653.3211 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0.00 0.0012
201.80 Sqm. 65.7 138 13258.26 27848.4013
0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00160388.21 470819.26
14124.58484943.83
1.603.254.85
Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)
Grand Total
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work filling behind foundation dry or moistsoil including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking ofclods dressing to require profile with manualcompaction including intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Contingency charges @ 3%Total
Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Murrum
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per itemNo. 2(c) Page no.-1&item no. 189 (b),(c) page no.-17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Abstract of Cost of Anicut
Name of VillageName of Site
0Near Ramshingh parmar Farm
Item
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Rate Amount
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
S.No.
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1.5 M.Length of Crest 18 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.5 M. 1.3 M.
1.0 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 10.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.8 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.3 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 2.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 4.0 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.3 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.
Total 300.002
240 X 6.0 = 240 Sqm.
3
2 40 x 6 x 0.15 = 72
Total 72 Cum.4
2 40 4 2 640 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 1 X 18 X 2.7 X 1.5 = 72.90H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 1.5 X 2.0 = 58.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.5 = 12.00 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 3.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 18 X 2.0 X 0.75 = 27.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 18 X 0.30 X 0.8 = 4.05 Cum.
Total 176.951 30% 53.092 60% 106.173 10% 17.70
Name of VillageName of Site
0Near Ramshingh parmar Farm
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Item
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soil
Earth work filling behind foundation dry ormoist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.Breaking of clods dressing to require profilewith manual compaction including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no.
Execavation in Murrum
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
Width of Apron =
contd..
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
6
H.W. 1 X 18.0 X 2.7 X 0.3 = 14.58 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10 X 1.5 X 0.3 = 8.70 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 1.20 Cum.Apron 1 X 18.0 X 2.0 X 0.3 = 10.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 18.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 1.62 Cum.
Total 39.307
H.W. 1 X 18.0 X 2.5 X 1.2 = 54.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 1.5 X 1.7 = 49.30 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 9.60 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.5 = 1.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 18.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 1.22 Cum.
Total 115.92 Cum.8
H.W. 1 X 18.0 X 1.8 X 1.5 = 47.25 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 0.9 X 2.8 = 51.80 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 2.05 = 13.12 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.3 = 5.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 18.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.81 Cum.
Total 118.18 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 18.0 X 2.0 X 0.30 10.80 Cum.Total 10.80 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 18.0 X 1.0 X 0.1 = 1.80 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.60 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.24 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 18.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.54 Cum.Apron 1 X 18.0 X 2.0 X 0.15 = 5.40 Cum.
Total 8.78 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 18.0 X 2.1 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 18.0 X 5.2 = 93.60H.W.Ext. 2 X 10.0 X 3.4 = 68.00S.S 2 X 4.0 X 3.4 = 27.20W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.9 = 7.60T.W. 2 X 18.0 X 0.2 = 5.40
Total = 201.8013
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
:-:-
Ac
10 18.0 10
H.W.Ext.H.W. 1
1.0c
S.W.0.6
B 4.0 B
APRON 2
1.0T.W. 0.3
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
PLAN AND SECTION OF ANICUT
Name of Village 0
0.6
Name of Site
1.50
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Near Ramshingh parmar Farm
W.W .
W.W
PLAN2A
PLAN
1.3
1
1.5
1.3
0.152.5
1.50.3
SECTION ON A-A'
0.6
2.8
B.L.1
1.5
C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
2.8
BED LEVEL
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 39.300 125.76 18.47 36.94 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 201.800 50.45 6.46 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 244.895 342.85 104.82 _ 269.384 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 8.78 51.28 3.95 7.906 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 570.34 133.69 44.84 269.38 Say Bags 571 S.No Rate Amount
or 28.55 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 47 1100 51966
1 Cement 28.55 MT. 3 Stones 95 850 809112 Sand 133.69 Cum. 4 Aggregates 16 700 110923 Stones 269.38 Cum. 5 Cement 571 210 1199104 Aggregates 44.84 Cum. 263879
S.No.
Tractor trip
Total Amount
ITEM
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village :-Name of Site :-
0Near Ramshingh parmar Farm
Material Statement
:-:-
Quatity Unit
Labour Total
1Labour Amount
Total Amount
300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00
2
240 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 326.40 326.403
72 Cum. 85.00 85.00 6120.00 6120.004
640.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 23680.00 23680.005
129.40 Cum. 0.00 0.0038.82 Cum. 91.00 91.00 3532.62 3532.6277.64 Cum. 99.00 99.00 7686.36 7686.3612.94 Cum. 134.00 134.00 1733.96 1733.96
6
28.02 Cum. 318 1643 8910.36 46036.86
7
86.89 Cum. 342 1252 29716.38 108786.288
81.92 Cum. 342 1252 28016.64 102563.849
7.20 Cum. 342 1252 2462.40 9014.4010
6.17 Cum. 312 2694 1925.04 16621.9811 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 0.00 0.0012
153.70 Sqm. 65.7 138 10098.09 21210.6013
0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00124508.25 347613.30
10428.40358041.70
1.252.343.58
Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)
Grand Total
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work filling behind foundation dry or moistsoil including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking ofclods dressing to require profile with manualcompaction including intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Contingency charges @ 3%Total
Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Murrum
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per itemNo. 2(c) Page no.-1&item no. 189 (b),(c) page no.-17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Abstract of Cost of Anicut
Name of VillageName of Site
BhilariNear Shamshan Ghat
Item
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Rate Amount
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
S.No.
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1.2 M.Length of Crest 12 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.2 M. 1.3 M.
1.0 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 10.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.5 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.1 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 2.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 3.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.3 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.
Total 300.002
240 X 6.0 = 240 Sqm.
3
2 40 x 6 x 0.15 = 72
Total 72 Cum.4
2 40 4 2 640 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 1 X 12 X 2.4 X 1.5 = 43.20H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 1.3 X 2.0 = 52.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 3.5 X 1.00 X 1.5 = 10.50 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 3.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 12 X 2.0 X 0.75 = 18.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 12 X 0.30 X 0.8 = 2.70 Cum.
Total 129.401 30% 38.822 60% 77.643 10% 12.94
Name of VillageName of Site
BhilariNear Shamshan Ghat
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Item
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soil
Earth work filling behind foundation dry ormoist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.Breaking of clods dressing to require profilewith manual compaction including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no.
Execavation in Murrum
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
Width of Apron =
contd..
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
6
H.W. 1 X 12.0 X 2.4 X 0.3 = 8.64 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10 X 1.3 X 0.3 = 7.80 Cum.S.W. 2 X 3.5 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.10 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 1.20 Cum.Apron 1 X 12.0 X 2.0 X 0.3 = 7.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 12.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 1.08 Cum.
Total 28.027
H.W. 1 X 12.0 X 2.2 X 1.2 = 31.68 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 1.3 X 1.7 = 44.20 Cum.S.W. 2 X 3.5 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 8.40 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.5 = 1.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 12.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 0.81 Cum.
Total 86.89 Cum.8
H.W. 1 X 12.0 X 1.6 X 1.2 = 23.04 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 0.9 X 2.5 = 42.50 Cum.S.W. 2 X 3.5 X 0.8 X 1.90 = 10.64 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.3 = 5.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 12.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.54 Cum.
Total 81.92 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 12.0 X 2.0 X 0.30 7.20 Cum.Total 7.20 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 12.0 X 1.0 X 0.1 = 1.20 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 10.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.60 Cum.S.W. 2 X 3.5 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.21 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 12.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.36 Cum.Apron 1 X 12.0 X 2.0 X 0.15 = 3.60 Cum.
Total 6.17 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 12.0 X 1.7 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 12.0 X 4.9 = 58.80H.W.Ext. 2 X 10.0 X 3.1 = 62.00S.S 2 X 3.5 X 3.1 = 21.70W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.9 = 7.60T.W. 2 X 12.0 X 0.2 = 3.60
Total = 153.7013
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
:-:-
Ac
10 12.0 10
H.W.Ext.H.W. 1
1.0c
S.W.0.6
B 3.5 B
APRON 2
1.0T.W. 0.3
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
PLAN AND SECTION OF ANICUT
Name of Village Bhilari
0.6
Name of Site
1.20
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Near Shamshan Ghat
W.W .
W.W
PLAN2A
PLAN
1.3
1
1.2
1.3
0.152.2
1.50.3
SECTION ON A-A'
0.6
2.5
B.L.1
1.5
C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
2.5
BED LEVEL
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 28.020 89.66 13.17 26.34 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 153.700 38.43 4.92 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 176.010 246.41 75.33 _ 193.614 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 6.17 36.03 2.78 5.556 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 410.54 96.20 31.89 193.61 Say Bags 411 S.No Rate Amount
or 20.55 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 34 1100 37391
1 Cement 20.55 MT. 3 Stones 68 850 581522 Sand 96.20 Cum. 4 Aggregates 11 700 78883 Stones 193.61 Cum. 5 Cement 411 210 863104 Aggregates 31.89 Cum. 189741
S.No.
Tractor trip
Total Amount
ITEM
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village :-Name of Site :-
BhilariNear Shamshan Ghat
Material Statement
:-:-
Quatity Unit
Labour Total
1Labour Amount
Total Amount
300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00
2
300 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 408.00 408.003
90 Cum. 85.00 85.00 7650.00 7650.004
800.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 29600.00 29600.005
131.40 Cum. 0.00 0.0039.42 Cum. 91.00 91.00 3587.22 3587.2278.84 Cum. 99.00 99.00 7805.16 7805.1613.14 Cum. 134.00 134.00 1760.76 1760.76
6
31.20 Cum. 318 1643 9921.60 51261.60
7
80.88 Cum. 342 1252 27660.96 101261.768
66.24 Cum. 342 1252 22654.08 82932.489
9.60 Cum. 342 1252 3283.20 12019.2010
8.10 Cum. 312 2694 2527.20 21821.4011 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0.00 0.0012
139.80 Sqm. 65.7 138 9184.86 19292.4013
0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00126343.04 339699.98
10191.00349890.98
1.262.243.50
Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)
Grand Total
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work filling behind foundation dry or moistsoil including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking ofclods dressing to require profile with manualcompaction including intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Contingency charges @ 3%Total
Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Murrum
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per itemNo. 2(c) Page no.-1&item no. 189 (b),(c) page no.-17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Abstract of Cost of Anicut
Name of VillageName of Site
0Near Devnarayan Temple
Item
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Rate Amount
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
S.No.
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1 M.Length of Crest 16 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.5 M. 1.3 M.
1.3 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 5.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 2.3 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.0 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 2.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 4.0 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.3 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.
Total 300.002
250 X 6.0 = 300 Sqm.
3
2 50 x 6 x 0.15 = 90
Total 90 Cum.4
2 50 4 2 800 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 1 X 16 X 2.7 X 1.5 = 64.80H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 1.2 X 2.0 = 24.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.5 = 12.00 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 3.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 16 X 2.0 X 0.75 = 24.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16 X 0.30 X 0.8 = 3.60 Cum.
Total 131.401 30% 39.422 60% 78.843 10% 13.14
Name of VillageName of Site
0Near Devnarayan Temple
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Item
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soil
Earth work filling behind foundation dry ormoist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.Breaking of clods dressing to require profilewith manual compaction including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no.
Execavation in Murrum
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
Width of Apron =
contd..
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
6
H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 2.7 X 0.3 = 12.96 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5 X 1.2 X 0.3 = 3.60 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 1.20 Cum.Apron 1 X 16.0 X 2.0 X 0.3 = 9.60 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 1.44 Cum.
Total 31.207
H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 2.5 X 1.2 = 48.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 1.2 X 1.7 = 20.40 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 9.60 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.5 = 1.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 1.08 Cum.
Total 80.88 Cum.8
H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 1.9 X 1 = 30.40 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 0.8 X 2.3 = 18.40 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 1.80 = 11.52 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.3 = 5.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.72 Cum.
Total 66.24 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 16.0 X 2.0 X 0.30 9.60 Cum.Total 9.60 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 1.3 X 0.1 = 2.08 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.30 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.24 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 16.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.48 Cum.Apron 1 X 16.0 X 2.0 X 0.15 = 4.80 Cum.
Total 8.10 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 16.0 X 1.6 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 16.0 X 4.7 = 75.20H.W.Ext. 2 X 5.0 X 2.9 = 29.00S.S 2 X 4.0 X 2.9 = 23.20W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.9 = 7.60T.W. 2 X 16.0 X 0.2 = 4.80
Total = 139.8013
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
:-:-
Ac
5 16.0 5
H.W.Ext.H.W. 1.3
1.0c
S.W.0.6
B 4.0 B
APRON 2
1.0T.W. 0.3
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
PLAN AND SECTION OF ANICUT
Name of Village 0
0.6
Name of Site
1.20
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Near Devnarayan Temple
W.W .
W.W
PLAN2A
PLAN
1.3
1.3
1
1.3
0.152.5
1.50.3
SECTION ON A-A'
0.6
2.3
B.L.1
1.5
C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
2.3
BED LEVEL
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 31.200 99.84 14.66 29.33 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 139.800 34.95 4.47 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 156.720 219.41 67.08 _ 172.394 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 8.10 47.30 3.65 7.296 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 401.50 89.86 36.62 172.39 Say Bags 402 S.No Rate Amount
or 20.10 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 32 1100 34927
1 Cement 20.1 MT. 3 Stones 61 850 517792 Sand 89.86 Cum. 4 Aggregates 13 700 90573 Stones 172.39 Cum. 5 Cement 402 210 844204 Aggregates 36.62 Cum. 180183
S.No.
Tractor trip
Total Amount
ITEM
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village :-Name of Site :-
0Near Devnarayan Temple
Material Statement
:-:-
Quatity Unit
Labour Total
1Labour Amount
Total Amount
300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00
2
300 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 408.00 408.003
90 Cum. 85.00 85.00 7650.00 7650.004
800.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 29600.00 29600.005
172.00 Cum. 0.00 0.0051.60 Cum. 91.00 91.00 4695.60 4695.60
103.20 Cum. 99.00 99.00 10216.80 10216.8017.20 Cum. 134.00 134.00 2304.80 2304.80
6
40.20 Cum. 318 1643 12783.60 66048.60
7
107.65 Cum. 342 1552 36816.30 167072.808
121.11 Cum. 342 1552 41419.62 187962.729
12.00 Cum. 342 1552 4104.00 18624.0010
9.97 Cum. 312 2694 3110.64 26859.1811 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0.00 0.0012
193.70 Sqm. 65.7 138 12726.09 26730.6013
0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00166135.45 548473.10
16454.19564927.29
1.663.995.65
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Rate Amount
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
S.No.
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per itemNo. 2(c) Page no.-1&item no. 189 (b),(c) page no.-17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Abstract of Cost of Anicut
Name of VillageName of Site
TaswariyaNear Sitaram Meena Farm
Item
Contingency charges @ 3%Total
Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Murrum
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Grand Total
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work filling behind foundation dry or moistsoil including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking ofclods dressing to require profile with manualcompaction including intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1.5 M.Length of Crest 20 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.7 M. 1.8 M.
1.3 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 5.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 3.3 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.5 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 2.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 4.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.8 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.
Total 300.002
250 X 6.0 = 300 Sqm.
3
2 50 x 6 x 0.15 = 90
Total 90 Cum.4
2 50 4 2 800 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 1 X 20 X 2.9 X 1.5 = 87.00H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 1.7 X 2.0 = 34.00 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 1.00 X 1.5 = 13.50 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 3.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 20 X 2.0 X 0.75 = 30.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20 X 0.30 X 0.8 = 4.50 Cum.
Total 172.001 30% 51.602 60% 103.203 10% 17.20
contd..
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Width of Apron =
Item
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soil
Earth work filling behind foundation dry ormoist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.Breaking of clods dressing to require profilewith manual compaction including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no.
Execavation in Murrum
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of VillageName of Site
TaswariyaNear Sitaram Meena Farm
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
6
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2.9 X 0.3 = 17.40 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5 X 1.7 X 0.3 = 5.10 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.70 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 1.20 Cum.Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.0 X 0.3 = 12.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 1.80 Cum.
Total 40.207
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2.7 X 1.2 = 64.80 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 1.7 X 1.7 = 28.90 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 10.80 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.5 = 1.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 1.35 Cum.
Total 107.65 Cum.8
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 2 X 1.5 = 60.00 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 1.1 X 3.3 = 34.65 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 0.8 X 2.55 = 18.36 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.8 = 7.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.90 Cum.
Total 121.11 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.0 X 0.30 12.00 Cum.Total 12.00 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 1.3 X 0.1 = 2.60 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 5.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.30 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.27 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 20.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.60 Cum.Apron 1 X 20.0 X 2.0 X 0.15 = 6.00 Cum.
Total 9.97 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 20.0 X 2.1 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 20.0 X 5.2 = 104.00H.W.Ext. 2 X 5.0 X 3.9 = 39.00S.S 2 X 4.5 X 3.9 = 35.10W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 2.4 = 9.60T.W. 2 X 20.0 X 0.2 = 6.00
Total = 193.7013
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
:-:-
Ac
5 20.0 5
H.W.Ext.H.W. 1.3
1.0c
S.W.0.6
B 4.5 B
APRON 2
1.3T.W. 0.3
Name of Site
1.40
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Near Sitaram Meena Farm
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
PLAN AND SECTION OF ANICUT
Name of Village Taswariya
0.6
W.W .
W.W
PLAN2A
PLAN
1.8
1.3
1.5
1.8
0.152.7
1.50.3
SECTION ON A-A'
0.6
3.3
B.L.1
1.5
C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.
BED LEVEL
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
3.3
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 40.200 128.64 18.89 37.79 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 193.700 48.43 6.20 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 240.760 337.06 103.05 _ 264.844 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 9.97 58.22 4.49 8.976 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 572.35 132.62 46.76 264.84 Say Bags 573 S.No Rate Amount
or 28.65 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 47 1100 51550
1 Cement 28.65 MT. 3 Stones 94 850 795442 Sand 132.62 Cum. 4 Aggregates 17 700 115663 Stones 264.84 Cum. 5 Cement 573 210 1203304 Aggregates 46.76 Cum. 262991
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village :-Name of Site :-
TaswariyaNear Sitaram Meena Farm
Material Statement
S.No.
Tractor trip
Total Amount
ITEM
:-:-
Quatity Unit
Labour Total Labour Total
1
300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00
2
600 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 816.00 816.003
180 Cum. 85.00 85.00 15300.00 15300.004
1600.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 59200.00 59200.005
165.85 Cum. 0.00 0.0049.76 Cum. 91.00 91.00 4527.71 4527.7199.51 Cum. 99.00 99.00 9851.49 9851.4916.59 Cum. 134.00 134.00 2222.39 2222.39
6
37.50 Cum. 318 1643 11925.00 61612.50
7
106.62 Cum. 342 1252 36462.33 133481.988
109.05 Cum. 342 1252 37295.10 136530.609
10.80 Cum. 342 1252 3693.60 13521.6010
9.02 Cum. 312 2694 2814.24 24299.8811 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0.00 0.0012
189.60 Sqm. 65.7 138 12456.72 26164.8013
0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00196864.58 487828.95
14634.87502463.81
1.973.065.02
Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)
Grand Total
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 18 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work filling behind foundation dry or moistsoil including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking ofclods dressing to require profile with manualcompaction including intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Contingency charges @ 3%
Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Murrum
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
SubTotal
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per itemNo. 2(c) Page no.-1&item no. 189 (b),(c) page no.-17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Abstract of Cost of Anicut
Name of VillageName of Site
TaswariyaNear Devkaran Regar Farm
Item
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Rate Amount
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
S.No.
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1.2 M.Length of Crest 18 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.4 M. 1.8 M.
1.2 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 8.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 3.0 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.4 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 2.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 4.0 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.8 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.
Total 300.002
2100 X 6.0 = 600 Sqm.
3
2 100 x 6 x 0.15 = 180
Total 180 Cum.4
2 100 4 2 1600 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 1 X 18 X 2.6 X 1.5 = 70.20H.W.Ext 2 X 8.0 X 1.6 X 2.0 = 49.60 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.5 = 12.00 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 3.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 18 X 2.0 X 0.75 = 27.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 18 X 0.30 X 0.8 = 4.05 Cum.
Total 165.851 30% 49.762 60% 99.513 10% 16.59
Name of VillageName of Site
TaswariyaNear Devkaran Regar Farm
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 18of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soil
Earth work filling behind foundation dry ormoist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.Breaking of clods dressing to require profilewith manual compaction including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no.
Execavation in Murrum
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
Width of Apron =
Item
contd..
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
6
H.W. 1 X 18.0 X 2.6 X 0.3 = 14.04 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 8 X 1.6 X 0.3 = 7.44 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.40 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 1.20 Cum.Apron 1 X 18.0 X 2.0 X 0.3 = 10.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 18.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 1.62 Cum.
Total 37.507
H.W. 1 X 18.0 X 2.4 X 1.2 = 51.84 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 8.0 X 1.6 X 1.7 = 42.16 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 9.60 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.5 = 1.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 18.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 1.22 Cum.
Total 106.62 Cum.8
H.W. 1 X 18.0 X 1.8 X 1.2 = 38.88 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 8.0 X 1 X 3.0 = 46.80 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.8 X 2.40 = 15.36 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.8 = 7.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 18.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.81 Cum.
Total 109.05 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 18.0 X 2.0 X 0.30 10.80 Cum.Total 10.80 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 18.0 X 1.2 X 0.1 = 2.16 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 8.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.48 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.24 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 18.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.54 Cum.Apron 1 X 18.0 X 2.0 X 0.15 = 5.40 Cum.
Total 9.02 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 18.0 X 1.7 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 18.0 X 4.9 = 88.20H.W.Ext. 2 X 8.0 X 3.6 = 57.60S.S 2 X 4.0 X 3.6 = 28.80W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 2.4 = 9.60T.W. 2 X 18.0 X 0.2 = 5.40
Total = 189.6013
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
:-:-
Ac
8 18.0 8
H.W.Ext.H.W. 1.2
1.0c
S.W.0.6
B 4.0 B
APRON 2
1.3T.W. 0.3
Taswariya
0.6
Near Devkaran Regar FarmName of Site
1.20
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
PLAN AND SECTION OF ANICUT
Name of Village
W.W .
W.W
PLAN2A
PLAN
1.8
1.2
1.2
1.8
0.152.4
1.50.3
SECTION ON A-A'
0.6
3
B.L.1
1.5
C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
3
BED LEVEL
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 37.500 120.00 17.63 35.25 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 189.600 47.40 6.07 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 226.465 317.05 96.93 _ 249.114 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 9.02 52.68 4.06 8.126 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 537.13 124.68 43.37 249.11 Say Bags 538 S.No Rate Amount
or 26.90 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 44 1100 48461
1 Cement 26.9 MT. 3 Stones 88 850 748212 Sand 124.68 Cum. 4 Aggregates 15 700 107273 Stones 249.11 Cum. 5 Cement 538 210 1129804 Aggregates 43.37 Cum. 246990
S.No.
Tractor trip
Total Amount
ITEM
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village :-Name of Site :-
TaswariyaNear Devkaran Regar Farm
Material Statement
:-:-
Quatity Unit
Labour Total
1Labour Amount
Total Amount
300.00 Cum. 1.00 1.00 300.00 300.00
2
180 Sqm. 1.36 1.36 244.80 244.803
54 Cum. 85.00 85.00 4590.00 4590.004
480.00 Cum. 37.00 37.00 17760.00 17760.005
135.60 Cum. 0.00 0.0040.68 Cum. 91.00 91.00 3701.88 3701.8881.36 Cum. 99.00 99.00 8054.64 8054.6413.56 Cum. 134.00 134.00 1817.04 1817.04
6
29.55 Cum. 318 1643 9396.90 48550.65
7
91.56 Cum. 342 1252 31313.52 114633.128
106.00 Cum. 342 1252 36252.00 132712.009
7.20 Cum. 342 1252 2462.40 9014.4010
6.29 Cum. 312 2694 1962.48 16945.2611 Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)0.00 Sqm. 24.2 0.00 0.0012
162.60 Sqm. 65.7 138 10682.82 22438.8013
0.00 Cum. 100.5 195 0.00 0.00128538.48 380762.59
11422.88392185.47
1.292.643.92
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Rate Amount
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungle includlingbushes shrubs and disposal as per instructrion ofengineer incharge( As per item no. 95 page 10 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per item no.156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
S.No.
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottom scrappingof sides dipodal of soil intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 30M( As per itemNo. 2(c) Page no.-1&item no. 189 (b),(c) page no.-17 of G.K.N.2011BSR of Bhilwara circle)Execavation in Hard soil
Random rubble stone masonary for Apron cementsand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no.190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Abstract of Cost of Anicut
Name of VillageName of Site
0Near Magana Bheel Farm
Item
Contingency charges @ 3%Total
Random rubble stone masonary for SuperStructure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( Asper item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSRof Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Murrum
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cementmortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a) page 8 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including all lifts inrequire profile (23 cm depth)( As per item no. 198page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Grand Total
Execavation in DIR
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium size ofaggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no. 191page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation &plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)Earth work filling behind foundation dry or moistsoil including laying in layer of 15cm. Breaking ofclods dressing to require profile with manualcompaction including intial lift up to 1.5 m andlead up to 50M. ( As per item no. 5 page 1 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Labour cost (Lac)Material cost (Lac)Total cost (Lac)
:-:-
General features of anicut-:Height of crest= 1.5 M.Length of Crest 12 M.Depth of foundation for H.W. = 1.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom width of H.W. = 2.7 M. 1.7 M.
1.2 M. Bottom width of Wing wall= 1.0 M.Length of H.W.Ext = 7.0 M. Depth of foundation for Wing wall = 1.0 M.Height of H.W.Ext. at H.W. = 3.2 M. 0.15 M.Top Width of H.W.Ext.= 0.6 M. Top & Bottom width of Toe wall= 0.30 M.Bottom width for H.W.Ext. 1.5 M. Depth of foundation for Toe wall = 0.8 M.Depth of foundation for H.W.Ext.= 2.0 M. 0.8 M.Length of side wall= 4.5 M. 2.0 M.Bottom Width of S.W. 1.00 M.Height of side wall at W.W.End= 1.7 M.Depth of foundation for side wall = 1.5 M.
S.No. No L B H1
1 50 6 300.00 Sqm.
Total 300.002
230 X 6.0 = 180 Sqm.
3
2 30 x 6 x 0.15 = 54
Total 54 Cum.4
2 30 4 2 480 cum5
Total
Berm 0.00 Cum.H.W. 1 X 12 X 2.9 X 1.5 = 52.20H.W.Ext 2 X 7.0 X 1.7 X 2.0 = 46.20 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 1.00 X 1.5 = 13.50 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.75 = 3.00 Cum.Apron 1 X 12 X 2.0 X 0.75 = 18.00 Cum.T.W. 1 X 12 X 0.30 X 0.8 = 2.70 Cum.
Total 135.601 30% 40.682 60% 81.363 10% 13.56
contd..
Height of Toewall=
Thickness of Apron=
Quantity
Cutting and clearing of ordinary jungleincludling bushes shrubs and disposal as perinstructrion of engineer incharge( As per itemno. 95 page 10 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Top of H.W =Height of Wing wall=Length of wing wall=
Width of Apron =
Item
Execavation in DIR
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Benching of the base and depositing theexecavated material for bund dressing etc. allcomponents( As per item no. 200(b) page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Execavation in Hard soil
Earth work filling behind foundation dry ormoist soil including laying in layer of 15cm.Breaking of clods dressing to require profilewith manual compaction including intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 50M. ( As per item no.
Execavation in Murrum
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Earth work excavation for foundation in dry ormoist soil including ramming of bottomscrapping of sides dipodal of soil intial lift upto 1.5 m and lead up to 30M( As per itemNo.2(c) Page no.-1& item no. 189 (b),(c) pageno.-17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of VillageName of Site
0Near Magana Bheel Farm
DETAILED ESTIMATE OF ANICUT
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
6
H.W. 1 X 12.0 X 2.9 X 0.3 = 10.44 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 7 X 1.7 X 0.3 = 6.93 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 1.00 X 0.3 = 2.70 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2 X 1.0 X 0.3 = 1.20 Cum.Apron 1 X 12.0 X 2.0 X 0.3 = 7.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 12.0 X 0.30 X 0.3 = 1.08 Cum.
Total 29.557
H.W. 1 X 12.0 X 2.7 X 1.2 = 38.88 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 7.0 X 1.7 X 1.7 = 39.27 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 1.00 X 1.2 = 10.80 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.5 = 1.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 12.0 X 0.15 X 0.5 = 0.81 Cum.
Total 91.56 Cum.8
H.W. 1 X 12.0 X 2 X 1.5 = 35.10 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 7.0 X 1 X 3.2 = 45.92 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 0.8 X 2.45 = 17.64 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 1.7 = 6.80 Cum.T.W. 1 X 12.0 X 0.30 X 0.15 = 0.54 Cum.
Total 106.00 Cum.9
Apron 1 X 12.0 X 2.0 X 0.30 7.20 Cum.Total 7.20 Cum.
10
H.W. 1 X 12.0 X 1.2 X 0.1 = 1.44 Cum.H.W.Ext 2 X 7.0 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.42 Cum.S.W. 2 X 4.5 X 0.6 X 0.05 = 0.27 Cum.W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 1.0 X 0.05 = 0.20 Cum.T.W. 1 X 12.0 X 0.30 X 0.1 = 0.36 Cum.Apron 1 X 12.0 X 2.0 X 0.15 = 3.60 Cum.
Total 6.29 Cum.11
H.W. 0 X 12.0 X 2.1 = 0.00 Sqm.Total 0.00 Sqm.
12
H.W. 1 X 12.0 X 5.2 = 62.40H.W.Ext. 2 X 7.0 X 3.8 = 53.20S.S 2 X 4.5 X 3.8 = 34.20W.W. 2 X 2.0 X 2.3 = 9.20T.W. 2 X 12.0 X 0.2 = 3.60
Total = 162.6013
0 4 x 4 = 0.00
Flush pointing in cement motar (1:3)( As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
Bhilwara circle)25 m.m thick plastering on new surface in cement mortar (1:4)( As per item no. 70(a)
page 8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:4:8 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 50 mm. ( As per item no.191 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwaracircle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Aproncement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As peritem no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR
Random rubble stone masonary for foundation & plinth cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Random rubble stone masonary for Super Structure cement sand mortar(1:6) for Anicut( As per item no. 190(a) page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Providing and laying of cement concrete wellmixed in cement mortar 1:2:4 laying in positioncomplete excluding curing with maxmium sizeof aggregate up to 12 mm.etc. complete ( As per item no. 194 page 17of G.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Dry stone pitching of Hammer dressed witchpacking of voids of small stone including alllifts in require profile (23 cm depth)( As peritem no. 198 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Dug belling 5cm. To 7.5cm deep( As per itemno. 156 page 14 of G.K.N.2011 BSR of
:-:-
Ac
7 12.0 7
H.W.Ext.H.W. 1.2
1.0c
S.W.0.6
B 4.5 B
APRON 2
1.2T.W. 0.3
Near Magana Bheel Farm0
0.6
Name of Site
1.50
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
PLAN AND SECTION OF ANICUT
Name of Village
W.W .
W.W
PLAN2A
PLAN
1.7
1.2
1.5
1.7
0.152.7
1.50.3
SECTION ON A-A'
0.6
3.2
B.L.1
1.5
C-C' SECTION ON H.W.Ext.B-B' SECTION OF S.W.
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
3.2
BED LEVEL
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Quantity Cement Sand Aggrigate StoneCum / Sqm Begs Cum Cum Cum
1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 29.550 94.56 13.89 27.78 _2 Plaster in C.C. (1:4) 162.600 40.65 5.20 _ _3 Massonary in Cement (1:6) 204.760 286.66 87.64 _ 225.244 Pointing in Cement 0.000 0.00 0.00 _ _5 Cement concrete coping(1:2:4) 6.29 36.73 2.83 5.666 Dry Stone Pitching 0.000 _ _ _ 0.00
TOTAL 458.61 109.56 33.44 225.24 Say Bags 459 S.No Rate Amount
or 22.95 MT. 1 M/C QT. Rs Rs2 Sand 39 1100 42585
1 Cement 22.95 MT. 3 Stones 80 850 676502 Sand 109.56 Cum. 4 Aggregates 12 700 82713 Stones 225.24 Cum. 5 Cement 459 210 963904 Aggregates 33.44 Cum. 214896
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIWMP Watershed
Tehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State: Rajasthan, India
Name of Village :-Name of Site :-
0Near Magana Bheel Farm
Material Statement
S.No.
Tractor trip
Total Amount
ITEM
Top Width - 0.6 m Bottom Width- 4.6 m Height - 1 m2.602.00
Labour Total Labour Total
1
Dug belling work up to 5-7 cm depth (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 14, item no. 156)
Rm 13.2 1 1 13.2 13.20
2
Excavation of head wall (2.0*4.6*0.15) (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 189 b)
Cum 1.38 91.00 91 125.58 125.58
3
Excavation for Extension wall at both bank (1.0*1.0*0.15) *2 (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 17, item no. 189 b)
cum 0.30 91.00 91 27.3 27.30
4
RR Dry stone Masonry in foundation (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 3, item no. 24 b)
Cum 1.68 273.00 706 458.64 1186.08
5
RR Dry stone Masonry in supper structure(Head wall+Ext.wall) (rate as per BSR-2011, P.no. 3, item no. 24 b)
Cum 5.8 273.00 706 1583.4 4094.80
2208.12 5446.96
163.415610.37
5600.00
0.6 m
U/S 1:1 D/S 1:31 m
4.6 mSide view
Unit Quantity
Cross sectional area- sqmAverage length of LBCD- mt
S.no
Foundation For Ecological Security
MODEL ESTIMATE OF LBCD (a) 1mtTehsil - Jahajpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
RateItem
Amount
Say Amt
Contingency 3%Total
Name of Village :- 0
6.0
2
Side Wall
Apron
Plan view of Gabian Structure
1
Key Wall Apron
Side Wall Main Wall
Logitudinal section of gabian
Notes :- All Dimension Are in Metres
1
0.6
0.6
2.0 2.0
Cross section of main wall Cross section of side wall
1.0
6.0
12.0
Integrated Watershed Management ProgrammeTehsil - Jahazpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India
Detail Drwing of Gabion Structure
Main Wall
Name of Village :- Name of site :-
Type of structure :- GPS position Latitude
LongitudeElevation Above MSL
S.no Particulars Measerment unit1 Length of Head Wall 6.0 metres2 Height of Head Wall 1.0 metres3 Top Width of Head Wall 1.0 metres4 Bottom Width of Head Wall 1.0 metres5 Width of Apron 2.0 metres6 Thicknes of Apron 0.6 metres7 Length of Side Wall 2.0 metres8 Height of Side Wall 1.0 metres9 Excavation Depth o side wall 1.010 Thicknes of Side Wall 1.0 metres11 Length of Key Wall 3.0 metres12 Excavation Depth of Key wall 2.013 Height of Key Wall 2.014 Total Length of Structure 12.0 metres15 Steps (V:H) 1 :1
S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount1 Excavation
As per BSR 2011,page no-1 Item no-2(B),page no-17 Item no-189 ©1.1 Side Wall 2 2.0 1.0 1.0 41.2 Below head wall and for Apron in H.S. 1 8.0 3.0 0.6 14.41.3 For Key in H.S. 2 3.0 1.0 2.00 12.0
Total Excavation 30.4 Cum.Hard soil 18.2 91.0 1659.84Mouram 12.2 99.0 1203.84
Total Excavation 2 Construction A As per BSR 2011 page no- 3 ,item no-24b
2.1 Head Wall 1 6.0 1 1.0 6.02.2 Below head wall and for Apron in H.S. 1 8.0 3.0 0.6 14.42.3 Key Wall 2 3.0 1.0 2.00 12.02.4 Side Wall 2 2.0 1 1 4.0
Quantity of boulder 36.4 Labour 273.0 99373 Wire mesh Material 433.0 15761.2B As per BSR 2011 page no- 18 ,item no-202(a)
2.1 Head Wall 25.02.2 Apron &Head wall foundation 61.22.3 Key Wall 80.02.4 Side Wall 16.0
Quantity of G.I. Wire mesh 182.2 Labour 15.5 2824Material 90.0 16398Total Cost 47784
Contingencies @ 3.0% 1433.53Grand Total 49217.71
Costing Estimation Say Rs. 49200.00
Foundation for Ecological SecurityIntegrated Watershed Management Programme
Tehsil - Jahazpur, District - Bhilwara, State - Rajasthan, India
Diamention for Construction & Costing of Gabian Structure
Quantity & Cost Estimetion of Gabian Structure
G.P.: Panchayat Samiti :-- Jahajpur District:-- BHILWARA
Labour Total Labour TotalExcavatoin in foundation & disposal of excavatedmaterial within initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 mincluding drssing etc. complete. (As per itemno.2(d) of page-1& Item .189(b&c) Page.17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR)HSMB (20%) cum 5.08 91.00 91.00 462.28 462.28Ordinary murram (50%) Cum 12.70 99.00 99.00 1257.30 1257.30Soft rock (30%) Cum 7.62 134.00 134.00 1021.08 1021.08
2 Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar(1:4:8 ) laid in position complete including curing.Aggregate size up to 50 mm. HB (As per itemno.191 page.17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR)
Cum 7.62 318.00 1643.00 2423.16 12519.66
3 Random rubble stone manonary in cement sandmortor (1:6) for foundation(As per item no.27(a)Page.3 of G.K.N.2011 BSR)
Cum 17.78 402.00 1313.00 7147.56 23345.14
4 Random rubble stone manonary in cement sandmortor (1:6) for super structure (As per itemno.27(a) page 3 of G.K.N.2011 BSR)
Cum 15.13 402.00 1313.00 6081.46 19863.06
5 Cement plaster including smooth finishing incement mortar ( 1:4 ) 25 mm thick (As per itemno.70(a) page no.8 of G.K.N.2011 BSR)
Sq.m. 25.31 65.70 138.00 1663.07 3493.21
6 Cement conerete coping in cement mortar ( 1:2:4)75 mm thick (As per item no.40(a) page.4 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR)
Cum 1.15 410.00 2913.00 471.92 3352.92
7 Rehandling of excavated soil from foundations ortrenches upto 1.5m.lift & 50 m. lead includingplaining of soil ( As per item no.5 page 1 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Cum 25.40 37.00 37.00 939.80 939.80
8 Benching of Base and depositing the excavatedmaterial including dressing etc. complete within inan initial lead of 50m & lift of 1.5 m (as per BSR2011 Item No.200(a) Page. No.17
Cum 270.00 67.00 67 18090.00 18090.00
9 E/W for bund / Excavation in dry or moist soilincluding laying in layer's of 15cm Breaking ofclods, sorting of grass pabbles etc. and dressing inrequired profile when compacted manually or byplain roller with initial lead of 30 M and lift of 1.5 M(excluding charges of watering and compaction inH.S.( As per item no.188(b) page 17 ofG.K.N.2011 BSR of Bhilwara circle)
Cum 1080.00 85.00 85 91800.00 91800.00
in O.M. Cum 1080.00 99.00 99 106920.00 106920.0010 Compaction of E/W manually or by plain roller
excluding watering charges (item No. 199(a) Pageno.17)
Cum 2160.00 14.20 14.2 30672.00 30672.00
11 Watering of earth, murrum highly weatheredmaterial or similar material to optimum moisture inborrow area when source of water being 1 K.m.(As per item no. page of G.K.N.2011 BSR)
Cum 2160.00 3.05 3.05 6588.00 6588.00
12 Dry stone pitching hammer dressed with packingof voids from smaal stones including all lifts inrequired profile of depth of 20 to 23 c.m.( As peritem no.195 page 17 of G.K.N.2011 BSR ofBhilwara circle)
Cum 82.80 166.50 598 13786.20 49514.40
Sub Total 289323.83 369838.8611095.17
380934.02380900.00
28932491576
380900
Rate Amount (Rs)
ABSTRACT OF COST
1
S. No.
Particular Qty.
Name of Work:-- Construction of NADI WITH SIDE WAISTE WEIR
Unit
Add for contingent exp 3%
LabourMaterial
Total
Grand totalSay Rs.
S.No. Particular No. Length Breadth Ht./Depth Quantity
1 2 3 4 5 6 71 Excavatoin in foundation & disposal of
excavated material within initial lead of 30m and lift of 1.5 m including drssing etc.complete. H.W. 1 10.00 1.00 1.00 10.00H.W.E. 1 2.40 1.00 1.00 2.40S.W. 1 9.00 1.00 1.00 9.00Wing Wall 2 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00Total 25.40HSMB (20%) 5.08Ordinary murram (50%) 12.70Soft rock (30%) 7.62
2 Cenemt concrete well mixed in cementmortar ( 1 :4 :8) laid in position completeincluding curing. Aggregate size up to50mm HBH.W. 1 10.00 1.00 0.30 3.00H.W.E. 1 2.40 1.00 0.30 0.72S.W. 1 9.00 1.00 0.30 2.70Wing Wall 2 2.00 1.00 0.30 1.20Total (Cu.m.) 7.62
3 Random rubble stone masonary in cementsand mortar (1 : 6) for foundation
H.W. 1 10.00 1.00 0.70 7.00H.W.E. 1 2.40 1.00 0.70 1.68S.W. 1 9.00 1.00 0.70 6.30Wing Wall 2 2.00 1.00 0.70 2.80Total (Cu.m.) 17.78
4 Random rubble stone masonary in cementsand mortar (1 : 6) for superstructure
H.W. 1 10.00 0.80 0.50 4.00H.W.E. 1 2.40 0.80 1.40 2.69S.W. 1 9.00 0.80 0.95 6.84Wing Wall 2 2.00 0.80 0.50 1.60Total (Cu.m.) 15.13
5 Cement plaster including smooth finishingin cement mortar (1:4) 20mm thick
H.W. 1 10.00 1.14 11.40H.W.E. 1 2.40 1.40 3.36S.W. 1 9.00 0.95 8.55Wing Wall 2 2.00 0.50 2.00Total (Cu.m.) 25.31
6 Cement concrete coping in cement mortar(1:2:4) 75mm thick
H.W. 1 10.00 0.60 0.08 0.45H.W.E. 1 2.40 0.60 0.08 0.11S.W. 2 4.59 0.60 0.08 0.41Wing Wall 2 2.00 0.60 0.08 0.18Total (Cu.m.) 1.15
DETAIL ESTIMATE OF SIDE WASTE WEIR
Name of Work:-- Construction of NADI WITH SIDE WAISTE WEIR
G.P.: Panchayat Samiti :-- Jahajpur District:-- BHILWARA
S.No. Particular No. Length Breadth Ht./Depth Quantity
1 2 3 4 5 6 77 Rehandling of excavated soil from
foundations or trenches upto 1.5m.lift & 50m. lead including plaining of soil
25.40
8 Benching of Base and depositing theexcavated material including dressing etc.complete within in an initial lead of 50m &lift of 1.5 mTotal (Cu.m.) 1 180.00 10.00 0.15 270.00
9 E/W for bund / Excavation in dry or moistsoil including laying in layer's of 15cmBreaking of clods, sorting of grass pabblesetc. and dressing in required profile whencompacted manually or by plain roller withinitial lead of 30 M and lift of 1.5 M(excluding charges of watering andcompaction )in H.S. 0.5 180.00 6.00 2.00 1080.00in O.M. 0.5 180.00 6.00 2.00 1080.00Total (Cu.m.) 2160.00
10 Compaction of E/W manually or by plainroller excluding watering chargesTotal (Cu.m.) 2160.00
11 Watering of earth, murrum highlyweathered material or similar material tooptimum moisture in borrow area whensource of water being 1 K.m.Total (Cu.m.) 2160.00
12 Dry stone pitching hammer dressed withpacking of voids from smaal stonesincluding all lifts in required profile of depthof 20 to 23 c.m.Total (Cu.m.) 1 180.00 2.00 0.23 82.80
G.P.: Panchayat Samiti :-- Jahajpur District:-- BHILWARA
2.40
10.00
HWE 0.601.00
S/W9.00
W/W
0.60 2.00
Not to the scale
Name of Work:-- Construction of NADI WITH SIDE WAISTE WEIR
HEAD WALL
(All dimensions in m.)PLAN
S.No. Particulars Qty. Cement (Bags)
Sand (Cum.)
Stone (Cum.)
50 mm 20 mm1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Cement concrete (1:4:8)Aggregate size up to 50mm (cum)
7.62 24.38 3.43 6.86
2 RR Stone masonary in CM (1:6)for foundation & Superstructure(cum)
32.91 46.07 9.87 36.20
3 Cement Plaster (1:4) 25mm thick(Sq.m.)
25.31 5.67 0.81
4 Dry Stone pitching (cum) 82.80 91.08
5 Cement concrete coping (1:2:4)75mm thick (cum.)
1.15 6.72 0.47 0.94
Total 82.85 14.58 6.86 0.94 127.28
Say= 4.14 M.T.
MATERIAL CONSUMPTION STATEMENT
Aggregate (Cum)
Name of Work:-- Construction of NADI WITH SIDE WAISTE WEIR G.P.: Panchayat Samiti :-- Jahajpur District:-- BHILWARA
S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Cost per Beneficiaries Total Amt (Rs) Remark1 Inaugration 1 5000.00 167 5000.002 Boarding Charges 1 120000.00 4000 120000.003 Salary of Faculty 1 17000.00 567 17000.004 Guest faculty honarorium 1 30000.00 1000 30000.005 Stationary and Reading Material 1 20000.00 667 20000.006 Raw Material 1 50000.00 1667 50000.007 Field Visit 1 15000.00 500 15000.008 Monitoring 1 10000.00 333 10000.009 Misc 1 5000.00 167 5000.00
TOTAL 9067 272000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of skill upgradation in Domestic electricity and based appliances repairing Unit cost for 30 beneficiry
S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Cost per Beneficiaries Total Amt (Rs) Remark1 Inaugration 1 5000.00 167 5000.002 Boarding Charges 1 75000.00 2500 75000.003 Salary of Faculty 1 15000.00 500 15000.004 Guest faculty honarorium 1 15000.00 500 15000.005 Stationary and Reading Material 1 15000.00 500 15000.006 Raw Material 1 35000.00 1167 35000.007 Field Visit 1 15000.00 500 15000.008 Monitoring 1 10000.00 333 10000.009 Misc 1 5000.00 167 5000.00
TOTAL 6333 190000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of skill upgradation on stiching Unit cost for 30 beneficiry
S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Cow rearing (Gir) 1 30000.00 30000.00 As per Dairy model 2 Insurance cost 1 1000.00 1000.003 Transportaion 1 1500.00 1500.00
TOTAL 32500.00
Detailed Estimate of Cow rearing of livestock management & dairying Unit cost per beneficiry
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remarks
1 Goat rearing (Sirohi Breed) with insurance 1 5150.00 5150.00
2 Transportation 1 200.00 200.00
3 Life saving medicines/minerals/ insurance etc. 1 1000.00 1000.00 Insurance for 3-4 yrs
TOTAL 6350.00
S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remarks
1 Service Buck 1 10000.00 10000.00 One service buck is sufficient for 20 goats hence cost of service buck is 10000.00
2 Life saving medicines/minerals/ insurance etc.
1 1000.00 1000.00 Insurance for 3-4 yrs
TOTAL 11000.00
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Goat (Sirohi breed) rearing as part of livestock management & dairying Unit cost per beneficiry
Detailed Estimate of Goat (Sirohi breed) rearing as part of livestock management & dairying Unit cost per beneficiry
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
S. No Items Units Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Fodder seed intervention 1 1000.00 1000.00 Including new seed and local fodder best practices
2 Urea treatment 1 500.00 500.003 Urea molases/ Bricks 1 500.00 500.00 Common salt use in each dose4 Miscellanous expences 1 500.00 500.00
TOTAL 2500.00
Detailed Estimate of Fodder Management
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No Activity Per conception Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Cattle Breeding by A.I. 1 150.00 150.00
TOTAL 150.00
Detailed Estimate of Dairying (Breed Improvement)
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No ActivityPer
conception
Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Cattle Breeding by Natural Service in Buffalo 1 30000.00 30000.00
TOTAL 30000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Dairying (Breed Improvement)
S. No ActivityPer
conception
Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Cattle Breeding by Natural Service in Cow 1 25000.00 25000.00
TOTAL 25000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Dairying (Breed Improvement)
S. No Items Unit Rate Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Bricks 1200 2.75 3300.00 For dome construction2 Cement Bags 16 225.00 3600.00 Prefer red oxide cement
3 Stone Slabs 2 400.00 800.00 For cover the outlet inlet tanks
4 Corse sand (Bajri) trolly 1 1200.00 1200.00 Fine sand required for construct dome
5 Gravels trolly 0.5 2000.00 1000.006 Chulha/ Assessories 1 2400.00 2400.007 Pit digging cost 1 600.00 600.008 Labour cost 15 200.00 3000.009 Mason 7 400.00 2800.00
10 Miscellanous exp 1 1300.00 1300.0011 Biogas lamp 1 500.00 500.00
TOTAL 20500.00
Detailed Estimate of Biogas plant 3 Cmt Sized
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No Items Unit Rate Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Pressure cooker of 3 lit cap 1 1725.00 1725.00 15 % hike with actual market cost
TOTAL 1725.00
Detailed Estimate of Pressure cooker 3 ltrs item
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No Items Unit Rate Total Amt (Rs) Reference
1 Urja lantern with mobile charger including installation 1 1800.00 1800.00 Urja unlimited, a social enterprises
TOTAL 1800.00
Detailed Estimate of Energy Efficient Light
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No Particulars Per training Rate Total Amt
(Rs) Remark
1 Transportation 1 3500.00 3500.002 Logistics and food 1 2000.00 2000.003 Livestock Literatures 1 1500.00 1500.004 Resource person 1 1000.00 1000.00
TOTAL 8000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Paraworker (Jankar) for Animal Husbandry one person from each village
S. No Particulars Per training Rate Total Amt
(Rs) Remark
1 Transportation 2 3500.00 7000.002 Logistics and food 2 2000.00 4000.00
3 Soil water conservation Literatures 2 1500.00 3000.00
4 Resource person 2 1000.00 2000.00TOTAL 16000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Paraworker (Jankar) for Soil Water Conservation one person from each
village
S. No Particulars Per training Rate Total Amt
(Rs) Remark
1 Transportation 1 3500.00 3500.002 Logistics and food 1 2000.00 2000.00
3 Accounts in relation to village institution 1 1500.00 1500.00
4 Resource person 1 1000.00 1000.00TOTAL 8000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Paraworker (Jankar) for Accounts one person from each village
S. No Particulars Per training Rate Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Transportation 1 3500.00 3500.00
2 Logistics and food 1 2000.00 2000.00
3 Agriculture Literatures 1 1500.00 1500.00
4 Resource person 1 1000.00 1000.00
TOTAL 8000.00
Detailed Estimate of Paraworker (Jankar) for Agriculture one person from each village
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No Particulars Per training Rate Total Amt
(Rs) Remark
1 Transportation 1 3500.00 3500.002 Logistics and food 1 2000.00 2000.003 Energy conservation Literatures 1 1500.00 1500.004 Resource person 1 1000.00 1000.00
TOTAL 8000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Paraworker (Jankar) for Energy Conservation one person from each village
S. No Activity Types Unit Rate Quantity Amount Rs Contribution Details
1 Soil testing Sampling No 25.00 1 25.002 Seed Kg 20.00 5 100.003 DAP Kg 10.00 12.8 0.00 128.004 Urea Kg 5.00 20 0.00 100.005 Neem cake Kg 14.00 40 560.006 Trichoderma Kg 128.00 1 128.007 Neem oil Lit 90.00 0.8 72.008 BD-Compost Broadcast 700.00 1 700.009 Azetobactor Pcts 7.00 1 7.00
10 PSB Pcts 8.00 1 8.00
TOTAL 1600.00 228.00
Per 0.16 hect CostDetailed Estimate of Production system in Agriculture IPNM Demo
Soil test report compare before and
after.
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
Name of crop: Maize Variety: Navjot, Aravali
S. No Activity Types Unit Rate Quantity Amount Rs Contribution Details
1 Soil testing Sampling No 25.00 1 25.002 Seed Kg 22.00 20 440.003 DAP Kg 10.00 12.8 0.00 128.004 Urea Kg 5.00 20 0.00 100.005 Neem cake Kg 14.00 40 560.006 Trichoderma Kg 128.00 1 128.007 Neem oil Lit 90.00 0.8 72.008 BD-Compost Broadcast 800.00 1 800.009 Azetobactor Pcts 7.00 1 7.00
10 PSB Pcts 8.00 1 8.00TOTAL 2040.00 228.00
Soil test report compare before and
after.
Name of crop: Wheat Variety Lok-1, Raj-3077 , WH-147 Per 0.16 hect Cost
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Production system in Agriculture Crop Demo
S. No Activity Types Unit Rate Quantity Amount Rs Reference
1 Soil testing Sampling No 25.00 1 25.00 Expert DFRS Bhilwara
2 Plant materials specing 90 cm x 90 cm cuttings No 1.50 14845 22267.50 Expert DFRS
Bhilwara
3 Cost of cultivation Machine/ Mannual Hect 14300.00 1 14300.00 Expert DFRS
Bhilwara
TOTAL 14846.00 36592.50
Per Hectare CostName of fodder crop: Napier grass
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Fodder Demo
S. No Activity Unit Rate Quantity Amount Rs 1 Cost of Seeds Quantals 1500.00 40 60000.00
2 Transportation cost and loading unloading
Per Trip 1500.00 2 3000.00
3 Training expences for trainer and trainee
No 2000.00 1 2000.00
4 Storage, weight and scales set 6000.00 1 6000.005 Maintenance 3000.00 1 3000.00
6 System management and village institution
Meetings 2000.00 1 2000.00
TOTAL 76000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Seed Bank per village cover 40 families
S. No Activity Unit Rate Quantity Amount Rs
1 Cost of food grains Quantals 1376.00 40 55040.00
2 Transportation cost with loading unloading
PerTrip 1500.00 2 3000.00
3 Training No 1400.00 1 1400.004 Storage, weighting cost set 6000.00 1 6000.005 Maintenance 3000.00 1 3000.00
6 System management and building institutions
Meetings 2000.00 1 2000.00
TOTAL 70440.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Grain Bank per village cover 40 families
S. No Items Unit Rate Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 B.D.Innoculants 502 to 507 1 100.00 100.00
2 Slacked lime in Kg 5 25.00 125.00
3 Labour 8 150.00 1200.00
TOTAL 1425.00
Detailed Estimate of B.D. Composting
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No Items Unit Rate Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Compost Pit 1 1000.00 1000.00
TOTAL 1000.00
Detailed Estimate of Pit Composting
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
s. no. Componends of integreted farming system Area ha./Units AmountBunding with cenchrus / grass 400 R.M. 9500Crop (Groundnut + sesame (6.2))/maize + black grem (2.2) / sorghum + green gram (2.1) 1000 Sqm. 25000Grassland (cenchrus + stylo) with contour bunds at 8 m interval 400 R.M. 9180Kitchen gardan with drip system 600 Plants 15000Livestock (improved health, feeding and shelter management like vaccination , deworming, dehorning, feeding managers etc) 1000 Plants 20000Multi-purpose tree with improved trench system (Desi babool +Custard apple + karonda + ber) 0.5 ha. 35000Jalkunda/ farmpond/ 0.75 ha. 1200On- farm inpute production compost and - pesticidal crop management (NADEP/bio-dynamic manure/ vermiwash/ bio-pesticide) 0.125 ha. 4000Intercroping Of Maize & Blackgram 0.375 5000
A- 3 Deshi Maize 0.125 ha. 1000Vermi Compost with plastic Bad 1 Unit 4000Farm Pond With Plastice Sheet 6 Lack Liter 50000Total Cost 169380Contigency 3% 5081Grand Total 174461
A -1
A- 2
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Integrated Farm Model
S. No Items Units Rates Quantity Total Amt (Rs) Remark1 Supply of Anar saplings No 20.00 52 1040.002 Soil test 25.00 1 25.003 Transportation of plants 2.00 52 104.004 Loading unloading 52 11.005 Rehandling of plants 1.00 52 52.006 Layout of pit diggings 52 19.007 Pit digging 1m*1m*1m 57.00 52 2964.00
8 Neem cake application 4 kg per plant
Kg 56.00 52 2912.00 4 kg @ 14 Rs
9 Gypsum application 2 kg per plant
Kg 2.00 52 104.00 2 kg @ 1 Rs per kg
10 Trichoderma 100 gm per plant
gm 13.00 52 676.00 100 gm per plant @ 130 per kg
11 BD Compost 2 kg Kg 3.00 52 156.0012 Pit filling and plantation No 4.00 52 208.00
13 Drip irrigation No 20000.00 1 20000.00Cost of drip irrigation
considered on per Hectare.
14 Thawla making No 1.00 52 68.00
15 Vermicompost application 4 kg per plant
Kg 16.00 52 832.00 4 kg @ 4 Rs
16 Contigency 5% 395.00TOTAL 29566.00
Detailed Estimate of Horticulture Plantation per 0.16 Hect area
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
Sl.No Activity Unit Rate Qt Amount Remark1 Ladies finger seed Gram 100 0.250 252 Brinjal seed Gram 100 0.250 253 Tomato Gram 100 0.250 254 Chilly Gram 200 0.100 205 Cucurbits Gram 100 0.230 236 PSB Packet 15 4 607 Azatobacter Packet 7 4 288 BD-500 Gram 232 2 4649 Vermicompost Kg 5 340 1700
10 Tricoderma Kg 128 5 640
11 Gravity based irrigation
No 1600 1 1600
Total 461011 Contingency 3 % 138.3
Grand Total 4748
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetail Estimate of Kitchen Garden 100 Sqm
S. No Type Unit Rates Quantity Total Amount Rs Remark
1 Pipeline (HDPC) for pipe line irrigation
mtrs 60.00 200 12000.00
Total 60.00 12000.00
Detailed Estimate of Pipe gravity irrigation .
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Jahazpur
S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Total Amt (Rs) RemarkA No. of Training 3 8000.00a Transportation 1 3500.00b Stationaries 1 1500.00c Food and Logistic 1 2000.00d Resource Person 1 1000.00
B Seed Capital 1 16000.00 16000.00C Working Capital 1 10000.00 10000.00
TOTAL 50000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Provision of Agri services/business by federations/ institutions/SHGs Unit cost for 30 beneficiry
24000.00
S. No Items Unit Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark1 Bricks 2000 3.00 6000.002 Cement 5 270.00 1350.003 Sand 1 800.00 800.004 Sheet for Shade 8 500.00 4000.005 Construction cost 1 3000.00 3000.006 Earth worm 5 200.00 1000.007 Seperation Sieve 1 1000.00 1000.008 Agro tools 1 1000.00 1000.009 Gunny bags 15 30.00 450.00
10 Exposure visit 1 10000.00 10000.0011 Miscellenous Expenses 1 1000.00 1000.00
TOTAL 28600.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Non farm small enterprises based on assetless person (Vermicompost)
Unit per beneficiries
S. No Items No of activity Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Electric multipurpose thresher governed by users group
1 20000.00 20000.00 Subsidy 50% avaibalble
TOTAL 20000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Agriculture based microenterprises
S. No Items No of activity Rates Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Chaff cutter governed by users group 1 10000.00 10000.00
If beneficiary dairy member, the subsidy might available 50% and cost of chaff
cutter reduced up to 5000.00TOTAL 10000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Animal based microenterprises(Livestock and Dairy)
S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Cost per Beneficiaries Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Inaugration 1 5000.00 167 5000.002 Boarding Charges 1 120000.00 4000 120000.003 Salary of Faculty 1 17000.00 567 17000.004 Guest faculty honarorium 1 30000.00 1000 30000.005 Stationary and Reading Material 1 20000.00 667 20000.006 Raw Material 1 50000.00 1667 50000.007 Field Visit 1 15000.00 500 15000.008 Monitoring 1 10000.00 333 10000.009 Misc 1 5000.00 167 5000.00
TOTAL 9067 272000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of skill upgradation in mobile repairing Unit cost for 30 beneficiry
S. No Details of Activity Quantity Rates Cost per Beneficiaries Total Amt (Rs) Remark
1 Inaugration 1 5000.00 167 5000.002 Boarding Charges 1 120000.00 4000 120000.003 Salary of Faculty 1 17000.00 567 17000.004 Guest faculty honarorium 1 30000.00 1000 30000.005 Stationary and Reading Material 1 20000.00 667 20000.006 Raw Material 1 50000.00 1667 50000.007 Field Visit 1 15000.00 500 15000.008 Monitoring 1 10000.00 333 10000.009 Misc 1 5000.00 167 5000.00
TOTAL 9067 272000.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of skill upgradation in Kasidakari Unit cost for 30 beneficiry
S. No Items Unit Rates Total Amt (Rs) Reference Remark1 Aatta chakki 1 10000.00 10000.002 Motor 1 5000.00 5000.003 Transportation 1 2000.00 2000.004 Electric connection 1 5000.00 5000.005 Foundation 1 3000.00 3000.006 Exposure and Technical training 1 3000.00 3000.007 Working Capital 1 50.00 50.008 Miscellenous 1 2000.00 2000.00
TOTAL 30050.00
Foundation For Ecological SecurityA-160,Subhash Nagar,Bhilwara,Rajasthan 311001
Integrated Watershed Management Programme, JahazpurDetailed Estimate of Non farm small enterprises based on assetless person ( Flour mill ) Unit per beneficiries