Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window...

46
bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

Transcript of Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window...

Page 1: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp1 / 46

Designing For Comfort:New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling

BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

Page 2: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp2 / 46

Ed May | Partner, Building-Type, LLC(architect, passive house consultant, teacher)

Page 3: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp3 / 46

Outline (45 mins)

• A Brief Introduction to Thermal Comfort• Passive House Institute certification and thermal comfort limits• Applying detailed modeling techniques to windows for Thermal

Comfort analysis• What’s next?

Page 4: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp4 / 46

A (Brief) Introduction to Thermal Comfort

Page 5: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp5 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Perceptions of Thermal Comfort depend on:

• Air temperature• Humidity level• Velocity of air flows• Surface temperatures• Clothing level• Activity Level• Age, Gender, Body type• Culture / Expectations• Control over space

Page 6: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp6 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Isn’t it just up to the mechanical systems?

Page 7: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp7 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

How do we improve comfort AND reduce energy consumption?

From: “Advancing Passive House Policy NAPHN 2016 policy session 1 presentations” John Lee. NYC Mayor's Office of Sustainability

Page 8: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp8 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Thermal Comfort Standards

Page 9: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp9 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Predicted Mean Vote [PMV]

0+1

Slightly Warm+2

Warm+3

Hot-1

Slightly Cool-2

Cool-3

Cold

From: ASHRAE 55, 2017. Appendix H3

“The predicted mean vote (PMV) model uses heat balanceprinciples to relate the six key factors for thermal comfort tothe average response of people on the … scale.”

1. Air temp2. Air Relative Humidity3. Air Speed4. Occupant Metabolic Rate5. Occupant Clothing Level6. Mean Radiant Temperature

Page 10: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp10 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Radiant Temperature?

Page 11: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp11 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

ISO 7730: 2005ISO 7730:2005 Table A.1 ISO 7730: 2005 Table A.4

Category

Thermal State of the Body as a Whole

Percent Persons Dissatisfied

[PPD]

Predicted Mean Vote

[PMV]

Radiant Temp. Asymmetry °C

Warm Ceiling Cool Wall Cool Ceiling

A < 6% -0.2 <> +0.2 < 2 < 10 < 14

B < 10% -0.5 <> +0.5 < 3 < 10 < 14

C < 15% -0.7 <> +0.7 < 4 < 13 < 18

T2T1

Page 12: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp12 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

ASHRAE 55, 2017

Mechanically Conditioned SpacesSection 5.3Any conditioned space

Compliance is achieved by demonstrating:-0.5 < PMV < +0.5 (same as ’Class B’ in ISO 7730)

‘Naturally’ Conditioned SpacesSection 5.4 but only IF…

• No mechanical cooling in the space

• 1.0 - 1.3 Met.• Occupants can control clothing

level (0.5 – 1.0 Clo.)• Outdoor temp is > 50-F and

< 92.3-F

Page 13: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp13 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

-3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

PPD

[Per

cent

Per

sons

Dis

atis

fied]

PMV [Predicted Mean Vote]

PPD = 100 - 95 * exp( -0.03353 * PMV^4 - 0.2179 * PMV^2 )

Overall PMV and Occupant Dissatisfaction

Too WarmToo Cold

ASHRAE 55 / ISO 7730 Class B Range

From: ASHRAE 55, 2017. Appendix H, Figure H3

We can’t make ALL people comfortable, ALL of the time.

There is a ‘floor’ of 5% Dissatisfied no matter what.

Page 14: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp14 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Localized thermal discomfortWindow to Wall Sheer Wall Corner

Source: Justin Downey. RWDI

68 F

53 F

Page 15: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp15 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

0

2

4

6

8

10

72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46

PD [P

erce

nt D

isatis

fied]

Window Interior Side Surface Temperature [°F]

PD as a function of a 'Cool Wall' Surface

Window Surface Temperature Effect

PD For a 71.6 F Space(when 10.4 F outside)

From: ISO 7730 Section 6.5, Equation 10: PD = 100 / 1+ exp(6.61 – 0.345 * ∆T [C] )

PHI

Cert

ifica

tion

Lim

it

ISO

773

0 Cl

ass

B Li

mit

U-value: 0.4(54 F)

U-value: 0.3(58 F)

U-value: 0.167(64 F)

U-value: 0.5(49 F)

Window U-Value (Btu/hr-sf-F):

Page 16: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp16 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Thermal Comfort Problems from Windows

Entire industries of products have developed in order to fix the comfort problems caused by poor quality windows

Page 17: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp17 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

The Passive House Institute Certification

“A Passive House is a building, for which thermal comfort . . . can be achieved solely by post-heating or post-cooling of the fresh air mass [supply air], which is required to fulfill sufficient indoor air quality conditions . . . without a need for additional recirculated air.”- Dr. Wolfgang Feist. 2006

Page 18: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp18 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Eliminate Perimeter Supply?

SUPPLY ZONE TRANSFER ZONE EXTRACT ZONE

BEDROOM HALLWAY BATHROOM

Often supply air (and therefor heating) is restricted to the 'core’ of the building for reasons of economy. This is only possible if the exterior surfaces have surface temperatures within the comfort zone.

Page 19: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp19 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

PHI Certification Requirement

Minimum Thermal Protection:“For the arctic to warm-temperate climate zones interior surface temperatures of the standard cross-sections of walls and ceilings as well as the average interior surface temperatures of windows may not be more than 7.6 F [4.2 K] below the operative indoor temperature 71.6 F [22 C].

…The requirements will be checked in the PHPP with an indoor temperature of 71.6 F [22 C] and a minimum outdoor temperature taken from the climate data set for the building's location.”

From: “Criteria for the Passive House, EnerPHit and PHI Low Energy Building Standard, version 9f, revised 15.08.2016"

For PHI certification this is the mean temp over the coldest 12 hour period for the building’s climate. For PHI certification projects in NYC this is +10.4F [-12C]

The ‘operative’ temperature is a simplified combination temp that

results from the air temp, mean radiant temp and air speed.

Page 20: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp20 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

7.6 F Radiant Temp. Asymmetry?

“Radiation temperature asymmetry: In DIN 1946 Part 2 a limit value of 14.4 F [8 k] (10 K in ISO 7730) is given for radiation temperature asymmetry (ΔTsi ) value for cold wall surfaces. The wording of the standard indicates some uncertainty around this value; due to practical experience with the comfort in residential areas, a lower limit must be required [for Passive House certification]. As a benchmark, half of the limit value of DIN 1946 could be used: in the designated spaces, the radiation temperature asymmetry should be below 7.2 F [4 K].”

Ventilation and Air Conditioning: Technical Health Req. 1994-2001

From: “Highly insulating window systems: examination and optimization in the installed state” Dr. Rainer Pfluger, Dipl.-Phys. Jurgen, Schnieders, Dr. Berthold Kaufmann, Dr. Wolfgang Feist. Passivhaus Institut 2003

Page 21: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp21 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

4.2 K Radiant Temperature Asymmetry?

In [Pfluger 2003] numerous further variants for the placement of cold structural elements were calculated. As long as the criterion ΔTsi < 7.6 F [4.2 K] was met, no inadmissibly high temperature stratifications resulted, even when the ceiling and window heights were increased.

From: “Comfort standards for passive-house windows.” Jurgen Schnieders, Dr. Wolfgang Feist, Passivhaus Institut 2007

Page 22: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp22 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Air Temperature Stratification?

Source: PHI

62.6ºF

68 ºF

TYPICAL WINDOW (Rw ≈ 3.6 (hr-ft²-F)/Btu )

Page 23: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp23 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

PHI Max Allowable Window UW-Installed (NYC)

Vertical Sloped Horizontal Roof

Horizontal Floor

W/m2-k 0.950 1.100 1.200 0.520

Btu/hr-ft2-F 0.167 0.194 0.211 0.092

From: “Criteria for the Passive House, EnerPHit and PHI Low Energy Building Standard, version 9f, revised 15.08.2016"

Page 24: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp24 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

UW-Installed ?

UgU-Value of the Glass

UwU-Value of

the Window

Uw-installedU-Value of the Window in the specific wall type

UfU-Value of the Frame

Page 25: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp25 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

UW-Installed: Calculation

(Ug×A glass) + (Uf×A frame) + (Ψspacer × Lspacer) + (Ψinstall× Linstall)

A window

Uw-installed =

The addition of the Psi-Install (calculated separately) is used to

calculate the Uw-INSTALLED

Page 26: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp26 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

UW-Installed: Window PsiInstall

Psi-Install: +0.043 W/mk

Page 27: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp27 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

UW-Installed: Calculation in the PHPP

In the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) the UW-Install is calculated uniquely for EACH window. These values are

used for both energy analysis and a thermal comfort check.

Page 28: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp28 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

UW-Installed: Window Size

2’ x 6’ 4’ x 6’ 10’ x 6’

Uf= 0.14 Btu/(hr-ft²-F)

Ug= 0.08 Btu/(hr-ft²-F)

Uw = 0.185 Uw = 0.169 Uw = 0.159

Page 29: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp29 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

UW-Installed: Average Surface Temp

2’ x 6’ 4’ x 6’ 10’ x 6’

Uw = 0.185Tsurface = 63.2 F

Uw = 0.169Tsurface = 64.0 F

Uw = 0.159Tsurface = 64.4 F

Tsurface-int = Ti – (Rsi × Usurface × ( Ti - Te))In NYC this is +10.4 F [-12C]

Page 30: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp30 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Issues with Simplified Surface Temp. Check

Probably a good conservative solution for the most part. But…

1. Prescriptive: Doesn’t allow for creative solutions2. Coarse: Doesn’t take all the specific parameters of the actual situation into account:

• Window and Room Geometry [View Factors]• Localized low-temps [Asymmetric Psi-Installs]• What about complex situations [corner glass, double height]• Is a single design-day calculation suitable or is annual evaluation

better?• What about summer comfort?

Page 31: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp31 / 46

Detailed Window Thermal Comfort Modeling

Page 32: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp32 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Goal: Develop a more detailed methodology and tool for Passive House designers to utilize for thermal comfort analysis and design related to windows.

Page 33: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp33 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Existing Modeling Toolshttp://comfort.cbe.berkeley.edu/

Page 34: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp34 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Existing Modeling Toolshttps://www.payette.com/building-science/glazing-and-winter-comfort-tool/

Page 35: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp35 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Existing Modeling Tools

Page 36: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp36 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Can it be used for Passive House certification?

• Relies on surface temps from an hourly (Energy+) model rather than PHI design day Exterior temps

• Uses Energy+ simplified U-Factor method for whole windows (no Psi-Install)

• Doesn’t output asymmetry result by default• Uses AHSRAE 55 targets not PH thresholds • Doesn’t calculate bi-directional asymmetry

Page 37: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp37 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Example: Candela Lofts Passive House

Penthouse Corner Glass Lobby Double-Height

Page 38: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp38 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Example: Localized low temperatures

Page 39: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp39 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Detailed Radiant Temp Asymmetry Calc.

From: “PAN CLIMATIC HUMANS: Shaping Thermal Habits in an Unconditioned Society by Chris Mackey"

Page 40: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp40 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Example: Analysis Model

Detailed Window Method Uw-installed Method

Page 41: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp41 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Radiant Temperature Asymmetry Map [-12 C Ext.]

Page 42: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp42 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Radiant Temperature Asymmetry Map [-12 C Ext.]

Page 43: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp43 / 46Thermal Comfort | Passive House | New Modeling Tools

Reporting analysis-point data

Page 44: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp44 / 46

Next Steps

Page 45: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp45 / 46

Predicted Mean Vote [PMV]

0+1

Slightly Warm+2

Warm+3

Hot-1

Slightly Cool-2

Cool-3

Cold

From: ASHRAE 55, 2017. Appendix H3

“The predicted mean vote (PMV) model uses heat balanceprinciples to relate the six key factors for thermal comfort tothe average response of people on the … scale.”

1. Air temp = ?2. Air Relative Humidity = ?3. Air Speed = ?4. Occupant Metabolic Rate = ? 5. Occupant Clothing Level = ?6. Mean Radiant Temperature

Operative Temp. =71.6 F [22C]

Page 46: Designing For Comfort · bldgtyp 1 / 46 Designing For Comfort: New Approaches for Detailed Window Modeling. BuildEnergy NYC, October 4, 2018

bldgtyp46 / 46

• Input boundary conditions for PHI Cert?• Need an easy way to calculate temp.

stratification without complex simulation• What about summer?

• ASHRAE 55 2017 now has a “Procedure for Calculating Comfort Impact of Solar Gain on Occupants” – should that be included as a requirement?

• What radiant temp asymmetry values should be used as targets?