Designing an Ethylene Plant Control Room and Operator User Interface Using Best Practices J....

18
Designing an Ethylene Plant Control Room and Operator User Interface Using Best Practices J. Errington NOVA Chemicals Inc. I. Nimmo User Centered Design Services Prepared for presentation at 2001 Annual Meeting, Houston, Texas. Copyright Jamie Errington, NOVA Chemicals Corp, Joffre, AB and Ian Nimmo, User Centered Design Services 78F

Transcript of Designing an Ethylene Plant Control Room and Operator User Interface Using Best Practices J....

Designing an Ethylene Plant Control Roomand

Operator User Interface Using Best Practices

J. ErringtonNOVA Chemicals Inc.

I. NimmoUser Centered Design Services

Prepared for presentation at 2001 Annual Meeting, Houston, Texas.

Copyright Jamie Errington, NOVA Chemicals Corp, Joffre, AB and Ian Nimmo, User Centered Design Services

78F

2 01/03/20Copyright

Acknowledgements The authors wish to acknowledge the support of:

– Tim DeMaere - NOVA Chemicals Inc.

– Peter Bullemer - Honeywell Technology Center

3 01/03/20Copyright

Objective & Outline Objective:

– Outline the design process and results of NOVA Chemicals’ E3 Manufacturing Building and User Interface

Presentation Outline– Background

– Overview of ASM (Abnormal Situation Management) and Best Practices

– E3 Manufacturing Center• Building Location

• Building Design

– E3 User Interface

4 01/03/20Copyright

Background Ethylene 3

– 2.8 Blbs/y - ethane cracker

– project kick-off 1997

– mid-2000 startup

– located in Joffre Alberta, Canada

– joint venture between NOVA Chemicals and Union Carbide

Designing for Abnormal Situation Management– AIChE paper presented in 1998 at New Orleans

– Described how NOVA Chemicals was applying ASM Best Practices information to the design of new facilities

5 01/03/20Copyright

Joffre Opportunity in 1998 Concurrently Building New Facilities

– Utilities Plant Expansion

– Ethylene 3

– Polyethylene 2 Training Simulators

– E3

– PE2 Exposure to ASM - AEGIS Prototype Management Support of ASM program

6 01/03/20Copyright

ASM - Abnormal Situation Management Consortium of companies and university affiliates:

– NOVA Chemicals, Exxon/Mobil, BP/Amoco, Shell, Chevron, Texaco, Celanese, Union Carbide, Phillips

– Honeywell (IAC, HTC)

– BAW

– Purdue, Ohio State, University of Toronto NOVA Chemicals joined in 1994

7 01/03/20Copyright

Goals of the ASM Consortium Reduce preventable process upsets by 90% Understand the problem

– Site Surveys Develop better methods for aiding operators during process

disruptions– AEGIS prototype

Improve other Supporting Systems– Collateral Studies

– Other technology Deliverables

Not by Technology alone!

8 01/03/20Copyright

ASM Best Practices Compiled from extensive site reviews across a wide spectrum

including:– Training

– Procedures

– Tracking and Reporting

– Communication Systems

– Work Context and Environment

9 01/03/20Copyright

Control Centre Location Goal

– “to build a control center that will enhance the human performance in and around the control room”

Location Design Process– literature survey

– multi-discipline team examined alternative locations

– evaluated on cost, impact on people, safety implications, business issues Review Solutions

– remote - centralized control building - multiple plants

– centralized control building within battery limits

– individualized distributed control buildings Selection

– individual distributed control buildings Driving forces

– communications within unit

– higher personnel safety

10 01/03/20Copyright

Manufacturing Building Goal

– to enhance how the manufacturing team (Operations, Maintenance and Technical) control system works together in and around the control system

Building Design Process– Created design vision for the building

– Interviewed primary users at adjacent Joffre units for needs and requirements

– Iterative process to refine key elements and share vision Key components

– control room was the center of focus

– communication patterns in the control room and the building

– determined adjacency matrix• prioritized the layout and size of rooms

• task segregation (permitting, meetings, etc.)

• traffic flow patterns

– control console layout

11 01/03/20Copyright

E3 Control Room

12 01/03/20Copyright

User Interface The goal of the User Interface Design is to improve operator access to

information thereby improving plant performance. Principal design aspects which have been considered in the design

were:– Navigation

– Visual Coding

– Alarm Information• live alarms

• AOA design information

– Control Information• cascades

• critical / redundant instrumentation

– Trend Information

– On-line Documentation

13 01/03/20Copyright

User Interface

Level 3

SP

TagName

Status ViewAlarmSummary

Level 1

PV

OP

Level 2

Level 4

Operations View

14 01/03/20Copyright

User Interface Status View

– Level 1 - Area Overview

– Alarm Summary Operations View

– Level 2 - Unit Summary

– Level 3 - Sub-unit

– Level 4 - Group Displays

15 01/03/20Copyright

Status View

16 01/03/20Copyright

Operations View

17 01/03/20Copyright

Task- and System-based model integration Research Project

– University of Toronto / Honeywell/ NOVA and ASM Consortium Task Modelling

– focus on the user’s tasks, plans and goals System Modelling

– functional structure of the plant or system

– captures the physical and chemical principles

18 01/03/20Copyright

Conclusion Manufacturing building design has been successful User interface design is a bold step that will get even better with new

developments– online information,

– new modelling approaches, and

– faster computers