Design Review March 2, 2010. Our Partner: The St. Vincent Pediatric Rehabilitation Center Located in...

70
Design Review March 2, 2010

Transcript of Design Review March 2, 2010. Our Partner: The St. Vincent Pediatric Rehabilitation Center Located in...

  • Slide 1
  • Design Review March 2, 2010
  • Slide 2
  • Our Partner: The St. Vincent Pediatric Rehabilitation Center Located in Indianapolis Services Provided (Outpatient): Occupational Therapy Physical Therapy Speech-Language Pathology Audiology Each of our project teams work with an individual therapist to create designs that will aid them and also their patients
  • Slide 3
  • Our Partner: The St. Vincent Pediatric Rehabilitation Center Difficulties they are facing: Budget cuts and lack of funding Much of what they already have was provided through grants Cannot purchase new equipment on their own or even fix things that are broken In the winter, the children need to have coats on because heating the entire building is too expensive The therapists need new tools to help them provide quality care for their patients This is where we come in
  • Slide 4
  • The SVAT Team Advisors: Theresa Gordon Darryl Dickerson Team Teaching Assistant: Nate Cooper Team Leader: Gregory Pajot Project Leaders: Phelan Bybee AAC Team Michael Coots HEC Team Gregory Pajot Bike Team
  • Slide 5
  • The Projects 1. Augmented Assisted Communication (AAC) A website that aids patients with special communication needs 2. Hand-Eye Coordination (HEC) Measuring how fast a patient can react and how accurate their reactions are 3. Bike A device that is attached to an exercise machine that will monitor its speed and turn off a TV if the patients RPM drops below a threshold set by the therapist
  • Slide 6
  • Design Review-Spring 2010 Phelan Bybee Lisa Jasinski Elizabeth Merer Shyam Naidu SVAT AAC Team
  • Slide 7
  • AAC is in the Specification Development Stage
  • Slide 8
  • History 2006 AAC created Problem: Need cheap personalized communication tool Specifications: Inexpensive Accessible Personalize-able Identified solution: Web site patient communication
  • Slide 9
  • History Continued Web site pros: Inexpensive Accessible Personalization St. Vincents lost funding Links, pictures, & codes were lost or missing
  • Slide 10
  • Previous Teams Design Login Page Customized features: Number of options per page Types of options Custom Pictures Custom Sounds
  • Slide 11
  • Previous website
  • Slide 12
  • Old Website: Flow LoginMain Page Preferences Option 1 Sub Category 1 Option 2 Option 3 Sub Category 2 Sub Category 3 Sub Category 1 Sub Category 2 Sub Category 3 Sub Category 1 Sub Category 2 Sub Category 3Audio 3 Audio 2 Audio 1 Audio 3 Audio 2 Audio 1 Audio 3 Audio 2 Audio 1 Number of Options Type of Options Personalize Photos Audio
  • Slide 13
  • Currently AAC Spring 2010 started from scratch Learned PHP & MySQL Created basic website with multiple working strings
  • Slide 14
  • First set of options
  • Slide 15
  • If we select food
  • Slide 16
  • Current: Website http://epics.ecn.purdue.edu/svat/AAC/login.p hp http://epics.ecn.purdue.edu/svat/AAC/login.p hp
  • Slide 17
  • Timeline
  • Slide 18
  • Current Issues Login page Server Locating previous teams pictures/codes
  • Slide 19
  • Future Ability to personalize: Personal photos Personal sounds Choose # of options Choose type of options Add ability to create sentences at different levels
  • Slide 20
  • Delivery We currently have a working prototype of the website Will be updated Website with personal preferences: May 2010 Website with sentence creation feature: December 2010 User manual with coding comments: December 2010
  • Slide 21
  • Sustainability Why will this not be lost? User Manual Comments for code Documentation of location of files on EPICS server Backup files off server in secure location
  • Slide 22
  • Question?
  • Slide 23
  • Hand-Eye Coordination Design Review Spring 2010 SVAT HEC
  • Slide 24
  • Introduction Michael Coots First-Year Engineering Patrick Ransdell First-Year Engineering Bailey Manthan-Garant First-Year Engineering Lup Wai Chew Junior Mechanical Engineering SVAT HEC
  • Slide 25
  • 25 Community Need Therapists need A quantitative way to measure patients hand-eye coordination Patients needs Age 4-10 mental capacity of 4-6 More engaging/attractive device
  • Slide 26
  • Previous Semester Design 26 Consists of basic guitar hero style game using Adobe Flash T:\Spring 09\FMT\WorkingFLA\ Adagio - Google Chrome.swf
  • Slide 27
  • 27 Semester Goals This Semester Finish 2-3 designs for games in Flash Acquire measureable data from drum set Deliver a final product to St. Vincent May 2010
  • Slide 28
  • Estimated Delivery Date: May 2010 EPICS Design Process
  • Slide 29
  • Therapists Needs Measure hand eye coordination with quantitative data Reaction time= fly stops on pad to when child hits pad. % of correct hits Differences between current and new methods. Current Boring Unattractive New device Engaging Entertaining
  • Slide 30
  • Game Ideas Fly Swat Game Wolf and Sheep Game Slot Machine Game
  • Slide 31
  • Fly Swat Game Flagship Flash game Currently in development More details to in following slides
  • Slide 32
  • Wolf and Sheep Game Conceptual phase Based on simple motion and user input Likely candidate for second game to be made
  • Slide 33
  • Slot Machine Game Conceptual phase Simple slot machine concept Likely candidate for second and third game
  • Slide 34
  • Decision Matrix for First Game 1-Low & 5-High GameEase of coding Projec t Partne r needs Quickes t to prefect Entertaini ng for child Ability to retrieve data Total Points FlySwatte r 4443520 Wolf and Sheep Game 2424416 Slot Machine Game 3432416
  • Slide 35
  • 35 Game Start s User inputs # of rounds Round Starts Fly Buzzes around screen Fly lands on colored tile Time Starts User hits the drum pad corresponding color Time Stops Check mark or X is displayed Data displayed Prompts user New Round? Game Ends
  • Slide 36
  • Fly Swatter Game
  • Slide 37
  • 37 Preliminary Budget Item Amount Price (per unit) Total CostComments Drum Set 1$50 Already Purchased/But may need replaced PC to run programs1$0 Computer available at St. Vincent JoytoKey program 1$0 Already have Unforeseen expenses -$25 Total $75 Possibly $0
  • Slide 38
  • 38 Drum set criteria Drum set# of pads Wirele ss Compatibl e with PC? Portabilit y SturdinessSensitivityCost Rock Band 4Yes HighMediumHigh$40 Rock Band 2 4Yes High $90 Guitar Hero 5Yes MediumLowHigh$100 Ion Rock Band 7Yes NoVery High $300 DecisionRock Band$40
  • Slide 39
  • Thank you! Questions/Comments 39
  • Slide 40
  • Bike Project Team Spring 2010
  • Slide 41
  • Introduction PROJECT LEADER Gregory Pajot Senior, Computer Engineering TEAM MEMBERS Saurav Behl Junior, Electrical Engineering Collin Ramsey Freshman, First-Year Engineering Hyunwoo Shin Junior, Electrical Engineering
  • Slide 42
  • Partner Need Quantitative measurement when using exercise devices Indicate progress for insurance and doctors Need duration of therapy, and total repetitions/revolutions Motivation for the therapy patient
  • Slide 43
  • Partner Need Issues with measuring quantitatively: The exercise equipment they have are hand-me- downs Cant afford to buy new equipment Some of their exercise equipment does not have electronic functionality Others do, but are broken Cant afford to fix the broken electronics Currently, Suba has to count revolutions in her head and use a stopwatch
  • Slide 44
  • Project Overview A device attachable to exercise equipment Quantitative Measurements: Times the duration of exercise Detects and counts revolutions Motivates the patient: Therapist sets a threshold value for the patients speed If threshold maintained, TV stays on If not, TV turns off
  • Slide 45
  • Brief History Project began in Spring 2008 A functional prototype was delivered in Spring 2009 Proof-of-concept Feedback received in Fall 2009
  • Slide 46
  • Slide 47
  • Slide 48
  • Slide 49
  • Our Therapists Wish List Portable and adaptable Works on a variety of equipment Can move from equipment to equipment Can move from facility to facility Easy to install Easy to operate
  • Slide 50
  • Slide 51
  • Slide 52
  • Slide 53
  • New Design Concept
  • Slide 54
  • Concept Testing
  • Slide 55
  • Design Breakdown: Motherbox
  • Slide 56
  • Design Breakdown: Peripherals
  • Slide 57
  • Universal Remote Testing Two Different Mini Remotes: TV-B-Gone Codes are cycled on button press, no programming required Response varies depending on TV model (1 to 20 seconds typically) Remote-n-Go Initial programming (simple) Instant response Best type: Programmable
  • Slide 58
  • Rotary Encoder Selection Used for setting the threshold Therapist turns the knob to raise/lower the threshold Our therapist agreed that a knob input was preferred over a keypad
  • Slide 59
  • Rotary Encoder Selection WeightAbsoluteQuadrature Cost5$5.00 (8)$2.50 (10) PCB Real Estate54 signals (8) 2 signals, plus other circuitry (6) Ease of interfacing8Relatively Easy (8)More difficult (5) Granularity between levels2Only 16 levels (7)As many as needed (10) Accuracy / Reliability6Gray Coded (9)Can miss pulses (7) TOTAL212182
  • Slide 60
  • Magnet & Reed Switch Testing Used to detect revolutions
  • Slide 61
  • Magnet & Reed Switch Testing Tested 8 different magnets, 5 reed switches Objective: At least 2 Turn-On Distance Test Setup:
  • Slide 62
  • Magnet & Reed Switch Testing Results: Greatest Distance (5cm): MK03 & 7/8D Neo. Magnet Smallest Distance (0.15cm): MDSR-7 & 1/32T Neo. Magnet M1M2M3M4M5M6M7M8 R10.4cm2.1cm3.0cm5cm0.37cm2.6cm2.8cm0.4cm R20.37 cm2cm2.9cm4.8cm0.36cm2.3cm2.9cm0.4cm R30.15cm1.8cm2.7cm2.8cm0.2cm2.4cm 0.2cm R40.45cm1.4cm3.1cm4.2cm0.5cm2.6cm1.5cm0.4cm R50.6cm1.2cm1.8cm3.3cm0.5cm2.6cm2.7cm0.3cm
  • Slide 63
  • User Feedback System Design Placed in front of the user, indicates speed relative to threshold According to our therapist, important factors: Different colors No red color Does not get in way of machine
  • Slide 64
  • User Feedback System Design
  • Slide 65
  • Slide 66
  • Microcontroller Development Tool Selection Needed functions: Programming Prototyping Debugging Purchased: PicKit 2 & 28-pin demo board from Microchip ($55 total) Biggest Reasons: Compatibility, support, inexpensive
  • Slide 67
  • Slide 68
  • Additional Semester Progress Summary Microcontroller Programming: 83% Finished Only missing LCD & remote control interface PCB Circuit Layout: Interface diagram, draft of schematic completed PCB will be finalized soon LCD Selection Analysis Interface: SPI over I 2 C LCD Layout
  • Slide 69
  • Remaining Work Overview Finalizing microcontroller assembly code (< 2 weeks) Deciding on a remote (Remote-N-Go was slightly defective) (< 2 weeks) Assembling User-Feedback-System (< 2 weeks) Completing PCB Design (< 3 weeks) Motherbox Layout & Ordering (< 4 weeks) Integration & Testing (< 5 weeks) Delivery planned for May 2010 Total Design Budget: $360 Projected Unit Cost < $100
  • Slide 70
  • Thank You! Any Questions or Comments?