Design & Performance Analysis of Double U-Slot Microstrip...
Transcript of Design & Performance Analysis of Double U-Slot Microstrip...
![Page 1: Design & Performance Analysis of Double U-Slot Microstrip …ijarece.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/IJARECE-VOL-3-ISSUE-8-790-795.pdf · A monopole antenna for WiMAX applications](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042200/5ea05b6106f1da62dc1c617c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electronics and Communication Engineering (IJARECE)
Volume 3, Issue 8, August 2014
790
ISSN: 2278 – 909X All Rights Reserved © 2014 IJARECE
Design & Performance Analysis of Double U-Slot
Microstrip Antenna for WiMAX Application
M.Ravi kishore*, A.Janardhana*
*Assistant Professor , ECE Department, Sri Sivani College of Engineering, Srikakulam, Andhra pradesh.
Abstract This paper presents the numerical simulation of double U-slots
microstrip patch antenna for WiMAX application. In this design
two slots and one bridge elements have been applied to generate
the three frequencies bands. In addition, the antenna has
achievable return loss, radiation pattern and also bandwidths.
Due to the compact area occupied, the proposed antenna is
promising to be embedded within the different portable devices
employing WiMAX applications. A simple method to achieve the
multi band characteristic in a micro strip antenna is embedding a
slot in the patch. A U-shaped slot has been investigated in order
to broaden the bandwidth of an antenna. In this paper multi
band characteristics are achieved by embedding number of U-
shaped slots on the rectangular patch. Also, an L-probe is used to
realize matching between the feed systems and radiating system
in a wide frequency range. Radiation performance of the
designed antenna is simulated using the HFSS software.
Due to the compact area occupied, the pro-posed antenna is
promising to be embedded within the different portable devices employing WiMAX applications.
Keywords—Duel U Band, U-shaped slot microstrip,Rectangular
Patch,L-Probe, WiMAX, HFSS Software
I. INTRODUCTION
Wireless operators are increasingly pressured to enhance their
networks and service capabilities in order to keep pace with
the accelerating growth in wireless utilization and increasing
demand for high performing connections. As bandwidth
intensive, rich media applications are introduced, larger
volumes of subscribers consume ever-growing quantities of
data packets while continuing to utilize more minutes of voice. Simply acquiring more spectrum channels and deploying more
sites to resolve capacity issues can be decidedly inefficient and
costly. Revolutionary multiple antenna techniques at the base
station and end-user device, paired with sophisticated signal
processing, can dramatically improve the communications link
for the most demanding application scenarios including
heavily obstructed propagation environments and high speed
mobility service. Where conventional wireless network design
has long used base site sectorization and single, Omni-
directional antennas at the end-user device to serve the
communications link, with advanced multi-antenna implementations operators have a new suite of tools to
develop the robust wireless networks of the future.
The IEEE 802.16 working group has established a new
standard known as WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for
Microwave Access) which can reach a theoretical up to 30-
mile radius coverage. Moreover, in the case of WiMAX, the
highest theoretically achievable transmission rates are possible
at 70 Mbps. One of the potential applications of WiMAX is to
provide backhaul support for mobile Wi-Fi hotspots. A low
profile double U-slots antenna for WiMAX operation has low return loss and bandwidth[1]. Recently, proposed printed
antenna for WiMAX operation has the three frequencies bands
but the return loss not over -30dB. The broadband
characteristic of a microstrip patch antenna with U-shaped slot
has been confirmed by many published results[1] [4] [5]. Also,
several designs of broadband slots antenna have been reported.
A monopole antenna for WiMAX applications was proposed
in. In this project, two slots and one bridge elements have been
applied to generate the three frequencies bands to be used in
WiMAX technology. Basically WiMAX has three allocated
frequency bands called low band, middle band and high band. The low band has frequency from 2.4 GHz to 2.8 GHz, the
middle band has frequency from 3.2 GHz to 3.8 GHz and the
high band has 5.2GHz to 5.8 GHz. This project addresses the
numerical analysis of the proposed antenna for WiMAX
operation with acceptable return loss, gain and bandwidth. For
the numerical analysis we consider the substrate permittivity
of the antenna is ɛ r =4.4(FR4) with substrate thickness
1.2mm and feed by a 50 Ω microstrip line. The analysis is
performed numerically using HFSS software.
Mobile WiMAX has offered the industry a very capable
platform by which to deliver the demanding service requirements for wireless access today and tomorrow. With
the added support for a variety of advanced multi-antenna
implementations, Mobile WiMAX offers the wireless operator
considerable relief in meeting their growing network demands
with higher performance, fewer sites, less spectrum, and
reduced cost.
II. METHODOLOGY
A. Design of Single U-Slot Antenna
The configuration of the proposed antenna is shown in Fig. The substrate used for this design is RF-35 with relative permittivity of 3.5, loss tangent of 0.0018 and thickness of h1 = h2 = 1:524 mm. Dimensions of the ground plane are also 100mm X 100 mm
![Page 2: Design & Performance Analysis of Double U-Slot Microstrip …ijarece.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/IJARECE-VOL-3-ISSUE-8-790-795.pdf · A monopole antenna for WiMAX applications](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042200/5ea05b6106f1da62dc1c617c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electronics and Communication Engineering (IJARECE)
Volume 3, Issue 8, August 2014
791
ISSN: 2278 – 909X All Rights Reserved © 2014 IJARECE
Figure1: Configuration of the proposed antenna, and top view of the radiating patch and side view of the whole antenna structure
Ground Plane Length
100mm Patch Width(W)
30mm
Ground Plane Width
100mm 𝒘𝒔 10mm
𝒉𝟏 1.524mm 𝒍𝒔 10mm
𝒉𝟐 1.524mm 𝒅𝟏 1.5mm
Substrate Length
60mm 𝒅𝟐 1.5mm
Substrate Width
60mm 𝒑𝒍 15mm
Patch Length(L)
30mm 𝒑𝒘 2.5mm
𝒑𝒔 1.75mm 𝒑𝒅 7.05mm
Table 1: Antenna Design Parameters for U-slot Antenna
As shown in Figure2 the radiating element is a square patch. Electromagnetic coupling probe, known as L-probe .By using
the slot, the dual band operation of the antenna can be
achieved. In general, the First resonant frequency is associated
with the size of the square patch and the second resonant
frequency is associated with the U-slot parameters[7]. The
other parameters in Fig.6.2(Pd, Pw, Pl, Ps)are optimized to
achieve good impedance matching at both resonant
frequencies. For obtaining two resonant frequencies at 2.25
GHz and 3.8 GHz, optimum values of the structural
parameters of the antennas are as follows. By using the above
configuration the proposed antenna is like as the below fig. The total view of a simple u-slot patch antenna is designed by
using HFSS software. In this we use a coaxial feeding with
aperture type. The aperture slab is at the height of 1.542mm
from the ground. The main purpose of this is to improve the
matching between the feeding and the radiating element[8].
The single u-slot antenna not accurately suitable for WiMAX
applications because of its multiple band characteristics. Using
the single slot we got only dual band characteristics but to
access multiple band structures we insert another slot within the slot. B. Design of Double U-Slot Patch Antenna
A low profile double U-slots antenna for WiMAX operation
has low return loss and bandwidth. It has a triple band of
frequency the propose antenna[1][2]for specific WiMAX
application is shown below figure 6.5
B
Figure 2: Design structure of the single u-slot patch
antenna W 40mm C1 5mm
L 47mm C2 3mm
L1 20mm Substrate Thickness
3.048mm
W1 30mm Substrate length
47mm
W2 15mm Substrate Width
40mm
L2 15mm Ground Length 47mm
W3 2mm Ground Width 60mm
L3 20mm
Table 2 : Antenna Design Parameters for Double-U band
Patch antenna.
C. Return Losses
Return loss is defined as
𝑅 = 20𝑙𝑜𝑔 Γ Where Γ is Reflection Coefficient
![Page 3: Design & Performance Analysis of Double U-Slot Microstrip …ijarece.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/IJARECE-VOL-3-ISSUE-8-790-795.pdf · A monopole antenna for WiMAX applications](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042200/5ea05b6106f1da62dc1c617c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electronics and Communication Engineering (IJARECE)
Volume 3, Issue 8, August 2014
792
ISSN: 2278 – 909X All Rights Reserved © 2014 IJARECE
The resonant frequencies can be calculated approximately as follows
𝑓1
=𝑐
2 𝜖𝑒𝑓𝑓𝐿1 (1)
𝑓2
=𝑐
2 𝜖𝑒𝑓𝑓𝐿2 (2)
WhereL1 and L2 are the average lengths for current paths
of the 1st and 2nd resonant modes and c is the free space
velocity of light. The effective permittivity is also given by
𝜖𝑒𝑓𝑓 =𝜖𝑟+1
2+𝜖𝑟−1
2(1 +
10
𝑤)−0.555
(3)
Where h and Ware height of the substrate and width of the patch, respectively. The above equation, which is given is
valid for single layer substrates[3] [2]. However, while the
effect of L-shaped feed system is negligible, this equation
can be used for two-layered substrates provided that the
parameter h is substituted by the total height of h1 +
h2.The average lengths for current paths of the 1st and 2nd
resonantmodes can be obtained by using the following
approximate relations:
𝐿1 = 𝛼1𝑙𝑠 + 𝛼2𝑤𝑠 + 𝛼3𝑤 (4)
𝐿1 = 𝛽1𝑑1 + 𝛽
2𝑑2 + 𝛽
3𝑑3 + 𝛽
4𝑤𝑠 (5)
Based on results of several simulations, optimum values of 𝛽
and 𝛼 in the above equations are obtained as follows.
𝛼1 = 0.385;𝛼2 = 0.445;𝛼3 = 1.000;
𝛽1
= 1.097; 𝛽2
= 0.630; 𝛽3
= 0.876; 𝛽4
= 1.412
For the values of parameters the average lengthsof current
paths for the 1st and 2nd resonant modes are obtained asL1 = 38:3mm and L2 = 22.2 mm. Also, the effective
permittivityis obtained as 3.097. Thus, Equations give the
resonant frequencies of 2.25 GHz and 3.8 GHz,
respectively.
The below figure shows the whole designed structure of
theproposed single u-slot antenna in HFSS simulator.
Figure 3: design structure of the single u-slot patch antenna
The designed patch antenna with double u-slot had been given
below figure
Figure 4: design structure of the single u-slot patch antenna
III. RESULTS
A.Return loss characteristics
For Single U-Slot
Figure 5: Return losses for single U microstrip antenna
For Double U-Slot
The equations which is applicable to above is same for this
type antenna is
Figure 6: Return losses for Double-U microstrip antenna
![Page 4: Design & Performance Analysis of Double U-Slot Microstrip …ijarece.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/IJARECE-VOL-3-ISSUE-8-790-795.pdf · A monopole antenna for WiMAX applications](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042200/5ea05b6106f1da62dc1c617c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electronics and Communication Engineering (IJARECE)
Volume 3, Issue 8, August 2014
793
ISSN: 2278 – 909X All Rights Reserved © 2014 IJARECE
For double u-slot the return losses are small compared to the
single u-slot. This antenna will resonate at frequencies of 2.08
GHz, 4.6GHz and 6.6 GHz. The return losses at 2.08 GHz, 4.6
GHz and 6.6 GHz is -25dB,-10dB and -17dB respectively. It
has a high efficiency at this frequency.
B. Radiation Pattern
For Single U-Slot
Figure shows the measured co-polarization and cross-
polarization radiation patterns for both resonant modes. As shown in this figure, radiation pattern of the antenna is
broadside at both resonant frequencies. Also the cross-
polarization of the 1st mode is 17 dB less than the co-
polarization values in the angular region of μ <50mm. For the
2nd mode, the cross polarization level is considerably low in
the E-plane, and its values in the H-plane are acceptable in the
region of μ <20. Increasing the cross-polarization level of the
2nd mode in the H-plane is due to the large x-component of
the current density in the vicinity of the right and left edges of
the slot. Figure 4 shows simulated radiation efficiency. As
shown in this figure, the efficiency of designed antenna is better than 80% in both of1st and 2nd modes.
Figure7:2D-Radiation pattern for single u-slot
C. 3-D View Of Radiation Pattern
The radiation pattern is main concentration for the WiMAX
application. For WiMAX application [9] [4] the effect of the
radiation is up to 30 miles. The gain must be high for this type
of application the radiation pattern for single u-slot is
Figure 8:3D-radiation pattern for single u-slot
The gain of the u-slot antenna is 4 dB. Maximum in the
direction of perpendicular to the strip antenna. The side lobes
were negligibly small of -9dB.
For Double U-Slot
Figure 9:2D-radiation pattern
Figure10:3D-radiation pattern
The above Results are shown is is the radiation pattern for
double u-slot it has the gain of little small as compared to the
u-slot but the Bandwidth of this is high and it has a multiple resonance frequencies.
![Page 5: Design & Performance Analysis of Double U-Slot Microstrip …ijarece.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/IJARECE-VOL-3-ISSUE-8-790-795.pdf · A monopole antenna for WiMAX applications](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042200/5ea05b6106f1da62dc1c617c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electronics and Communication Engineering (IJARECE)
Volume 3, Issue 8, August 2014
794
ISSN: 2278 – 909X All Rights Reserved © 2014 IJARECE
D. Field Distribution
Figure 11: E&H-field distribution for single u-slot patch
antenna
For the view of field distribution there is no uniform
distribution in the single u-slot patch antenna. For non-
uniform distribution of these fields the return losses are
somewhat high. For decrease the return losses there must
perfect matching between coaxial system and the radiating
element then we can easily remove the return losses. The
below fig represents the E &H fields of the double u-slot
antenna.
Figure12: E&H field distribution of double u-slot antenna
The return losses for this are -25dB is because of the uniform
field distribution over the patch.
7.4 VSWR
Fig7.8: VSWR for u-slot
The VSWR is very low at the resonant frequencies for U-slot
it is 10,2 at 2.25GHZ,3.8GHz respectively. For double U-slot it is 7,2 and 1 at 2.08 GHz, 4.6 GHz and 6.6 GHz respectively.
The return losses and VSWR are related to each other
Figure13: VSWR for double u-slot
E. Other Antenna Performance Parameters
For Single U-Slot
Table 3: Antenna performance parameter at different
frequencies for Single U-slot
For Double U-Slot
Table 4: Antenna performance parameter at different
frequencies for double slot
![Page 6: Design & Performance Analysis of Double U-Slot Microstrip …ijarece.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/IJARECE-VOL-3-ISSUE-8-790-795.pdf · A monopole antenna for WiMAX applications](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042200/5ea05b6106f1da62dc1c617c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
International Journal of Advanced Research in Electronics and Communication Engineering (IJARECE)
Volume 3, Issue 8, August 2014
795
ISSN: 2278 – 909X All Rights Reserved © 2014 IJARECE
F. Comparison of Parameters for Changing the
Substrate Thickness
For Single U-Slot
Table 5: Antenna performance parameters at diff substrate
lengths
G. Comparison of Parameters for Increasing Slot
Length
For U-Slot
Table 6: Antenna performance parameters at diff slot lengths
IV. CONCLUSION
In this paper we submitted the antenna simulation results
for WiMAX application of gain using single u-slot and double
u-slot is 7dB and 6dB respectively. By using array of this type
of antennas it is sufficient to acquire high gain. We got the
results of return losses for both type antennas is -25dB and-
23dB at a frequencies of 2.25GHz. These are very low losses
.The bandwidth for both are 2.2GHz and 2.1GHz. The
resonating frequency occurs at 2.25GHz and 3.38 GHz.
Finally we got beam width of antenna is 30 degrees. The efficiency of this antenna is 95.3% and 91.2%
This paper presented the simulation of the Microstrip patch
antenna with double U-slots. From two U- slots shape on the
patch, the three bands can be generated. By adding one bridge
the exact frequencies band for WiMAX can be achieved. The
three frequency band 2.25GHz, 4.50GHz and 6.6GHz has
been achieved as well as the bandwidth requirements for
WiMAX standards 4.22%, 1.87% and 3.51% respectively. The
re-turn loss for the triple bands are -25dB, -10dB and -17dB
respectively. The U- slot patch antenna is designed for
increasing the bandwidth and return loss but gain cannot
increase. If array of the U- slot patch antenna analysis used
then the gain can be improved. Therefore, the antenna will be
better work in the WiMAX applications and wireless communications system.
V. REFERENCES
[1] AbuTarboush,H.F. ; Al-Raweshidy,H.S. ; Nilavalan.R,
“Triple Band Double U-Slots Patch Antenna For Wimaxmobile
applications”Communications, IEEE Conference Publication, APCC 2008.
[2] W.L. Stutzman and G.A. Thiele, Antenna Theory and Design, 2nd ed.
New York: Wiley, 1998.
[3] C.A. Balanis, Antenna Theory, 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley & sons,
Inc., 1997.
[4] Hattan F. Abu Tarboush, D. Budimir, R. Nilavalan “Connected U-slots
Patch Antenna for WiMAX Applications”. International Journal of RF &
Microwave CAF, 2008.
[5] H. F. AbuTarboush, H. S. Al-Raweshidy, “A Connected E-Shape and U-
Shape Dual- Band Patch Antenna for Different Wireless Applica-tions”, the
Second International EURASIP Workshop on RFID Tech-nology, July, 2008.
[6] M. Sanad, “Double C-patch antennas having different aperture shapes,” in
Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Dig., June 1995, pp.2116–2119.
[7] Murad NA. “Microstrip U-shaped dual-band antenna,” Applied
Electromagnetic, 2005 APACE 2005 Asia-Pacific Conference on 2005:4 pp
[8] Hadian AM. “Wideband rectangular microstrip patch antenna with U-
slot,” Antennas and Propagation, 2007 EuCAP 2007 The Second European
Conference on. 2007:1-5.
[9] T. liu and L. L. Wong, “A wideband Stubby Monopole Antenna and a
GPS for WiMAX Mobile Phone with E911 Function,” Microwave and
Optical Technology Letter, Vol 46, 2005, pp.