Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

download Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

of 272

Transcript of Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    1/272

    DESIGN

    OF

    COMPOSITE

    STRUCTURES

    AGAINST

    FATIGUE

    A p p l i c a t i o n s

    to

    W in d Turb ine B lades

    E d i t e d

    by

    R

    M

    M a y e r

    Warns

    ISP*

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    2/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    3/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    4/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    5/272

    Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    6/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    7/272

    >is* ^

    CU\

    .

    Design of Composite Structures Against

    Fatigue

    Applications to Wind Turbine Blades

    Edited by

    Rayner M Mayer

    BSc, MSc, PhD, CEng, MIMechE

    B U S

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    8/272

    First published 1996

    This publication is copyright under the Berne Convention and the Inter

    national Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair

    dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism, or review, as

    permitted under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, no part may be

    reproduced , stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any

    means, electronic, electrical, chemical, mechanical, photocopying, recording

    or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. Unlicensed

    multiple copying of this publication is illegal. Inquiries should be addressed

    to:

    The Managing Editor, Mechanical Engineering Publications Limited,

    Northgate Avenue, Bury St Edm unds, Suffolk, IP32 6BW, UK

    ISBN 0 85298 957 1

    R M M ayer

    A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

    EUR 16687

    The data here are provided in good faith, but neither the au thors , the original

    providers oftheda ta, nor the sponsors, are able to accept responsibility for the

    accuracy of any of the information included, or any of the consequences that

    may arise from the use of the data or designs or constructions based on any of

    the information supplied or m aterials described. The inclusion or omission ofa

    particular material in no way implies anything about its performance with

    respect to other materials.

    Neither the publishers, the European Commission nor anyone acting on their

    behalf are responsible for any statement made in this publication. Data,

    discussion and conclusions developed by the Author are for information only

    and are not intended for use without independen t substantiating investigation

    on the part of the potential users. Opinions expressed are those of the Author

    and are not necessarily those of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, its

    publishers, or sponsors.

    Printed in Great Britain by

    Antony Rowe Ltd, C hippenham , Wiltshire

    The bulk ofthefunding for this work was provided under contract JOUR -007 1

    with the European Commission (Joule programm e).

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    9/272

    Contents

    A bou t the autho r ix

    Scope of the boo k

    Ho w to use this boo k

    Preface xi

    Acknowledgements xi i

    Notation xiii

    Units xiv

    Chapter 1 Fatigue considerations 1

    1.1 Introd uction 1

    1.2 Design and m anufac ture 2

    1.3 Fatigue conside rations 4

    1.4 Stru ctura l design 6

    1.5 M ateria ls and eva luation 10

    1.6 D at a collection and analysis 11

    1.7 No n-destruc tive evaluation (N D E) 12

    1.8 Co nclus ions 13

    Chapter 2 Properties of aligned fibres 15

    2.1 Introd uction 15

    2.2 M ateria ls 16

    2.3 M echanical characterization 18

    2.4 Significance for design 30

    2.5 Con clusions 31

    Chap ter 3 Influence of matrix and fabric 33

    3.1 Introd uction 33

    3.2 M aterials and testing 33

    3.3 Static pro pertie s 36

    3.4 Fatigue pro pertie s 38

    3.5 Effect of m atrix 43

    3.6 Effect of fabrics 44

    3.7 Discussion 44

    3.8 Co nclusion s 49

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    10/272

    vi Contents

    Chapter 4 Influence of spectral loading 51

    4.1 Introduction 51

    4.2 The spectrum 51

    4.3 Materials and testing 52

    4.4 Constant amplitude data 55

    4.5 Tests with WISPER/WISPERX 59

    4.6 Discussion 61

    4.7 Conclusions 63

    Chapter5 Effects of environment 65

    5.1 Introduction 65

    5.2 Materials and specimens 65

    5.3 Exposure to humidity 68

    5.4 Hailstone simulation 70

    5.5 Testing procedure 72

    5.6 Results 74

    5.7 Statistical evaluation 80

    5.8 Conclusions and recomm endations 86

    Chapter 6 Glass and hybrid

    fibre

    performance 89

    6.1 Introduction 89

    6.2 Materials and static properties 90

    6.3 Fatigue of glass fibre laminates 94

    6.4 Fatigue of hybrid fibre laminates 100

    6.5 Fatigue of glass/carbon bolted joints 103

    6.6 Conclusions 103

    Chapter 7 Fatigue properties ofwoodcomposites 107

    7.1 Introduction 107

    7.2 Manufacture 107

    7.3 Advantages 108

    7.4 Constant amplitude data 110

    7.5 Life predictions and the W ISPER X spectrum 115

    7.6 Fatigue properties of alternative species 116

    7.7 Effect of joint configuration on fatigue performance 118

    7.8 Infra red condition monitoring of joints 119

    7.9 Conclusions 121

    Chapter 8 Benchmark tests 123

    8.1 Introduction 123

    8.2 Material selection 123

    8.3 Flexural testing 125

    8.4 Tensile testing 126

    8.5 Significance of static results 127

    8.6 Fatigue testing 129

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    11/272

    Contents vii

    8.7 Analysis of fatigue data 131

    8.8 Recomm endations 131

    Chapter 9 Comparison ofcouponand spar tests 133

    9.1 Introduction 133

    9.2 Materials and manufacture 134

    9.3 Material characterization 136

    9.4 Fatigue testing of coupons 137

    9.5 Methods of monitoring damage 138

    9.6 Com ponent testing 141

    9.7 Discussion 145

    9.8 Conclusions 147

    Chapter 10 Response ofbladeroots to high bending moments 149

    10.1 Introduction 149

    10.2 Experim ental details 150

    10.3 Pin-hole flange 151

    10.4 Trum pet flange 156

    10.5 T-bolt flange 165

    10.6 Discussion 167

    10.7 Conclusions 170

    Chapter11 Influence of moisture on GFRP bolted joints 171

    11.1 Introduction 171

    11.2 Effect of moisture 171

    11.3 Materials and methods 173

    11.4 Results and discussion 176

    11.5 Conclusions 180

    Chapter 12 Influence of complex loading on blade-root joints 181

    12.1 Introduction 181

    12.2 Description of tests 182

    12.3 Pin-hole flange 188

    12.4 Rectangular blade-root 189

    12.5 Conclusions 193

    Chapter 13 Evaluation ofT-boltroot attachment 195

    13.1 Introduction 195

    13.2 Load attachment principle, FEA-simulation 195

    13.3 Tests on EN ER CO N rotor blades 198

    13.4 Discussion 203

    13.5 Conclusions 207

    Chapter 14 Comparison of fatigue curves for glass composite

    laminates 209

    14.1 Introduction 209

    14.2 Linear regression analysis 210

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    12/272

    viii Contents

    14.3 Reverse loading 213

    14.4 Tensile loading 218

    14.5 Com pressive loading 220

    14.6 Flexural loading 220

    14.7 Other analysis methods 222

    14.8 Com paring new materials against the standard fatigue curve 222

    14.9 Conclusions 224

    Chapter 15 Recommendations for good-working practices, norms

    and standards 227

    15.1 Introduction 227

    15.2 Material selection and characterization 227

    15.3 Design 229

    15.4 Manufacture 229

    15.5 Coupon testing 231

    15.6 Structural testing 235

    15.7 Type approval 236

    15.8 Conclusions 237

    Glossary 239

    Index 243

    Principal authors and addresses 247

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    13/272

    About the author

    Rayner M. Mayer is the principal consultant with Sciotech, a company

    involved with product innovation and development. He obtained his PhD at

    Cambridge University and is a member of the Institution of Mechanical

    Engineers and a chartered engineer. He is widely published in technical and

    scientific journals.

    The consultancy specializes in the application of fibre reinforced plastics to

    load bearing components and structures for energy and transport applications.

    Heisresponsible for the scientific and co-ordination of collaborative Europ ean

    energy research and development programmes, such as Joule and Thermie.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    14/272

    Scope of the Book

    The first chapter outlines the process for designing with composite materials

    and how fatigue impacts on design. This follows the engineering design

    standard, BS 7000,A Guide to

    Managing Product

    Design.

    The principal considerations are discussed in the next six chapters (Chapters

    2-7),

    starting with the fibre orientation and considering, in turn , the influence

    of: the fibres; matrix; fabrics; spectral loading; moisture; impact; hybrid

    fabrics; and wood veneers.

    The various coupon test methods are then com pared by way ofabenchmark

    test using the same m ater ial. The effect ofscale isconsidered in Chap ter9when

    results from coupons and components are contrasted.

    Aspects of structural testing of full-size components are described in

    Chapters 9-12 . Both the methodology and the ability to monitor the damage is

    discussed.

    The final two chapters summarize the results from two viewpoints - that of

    design and of good working practice.

    How to use this Book

    Information can be sought at various levels.

    For those not acquainted with the mechanisms of the fatigue process,

    Chapter

    1

    should be consulted. The design strategy is outlined, together with

    how to assess the type of tests needed for materials and struc tures.

    Specific design aspects are then considered in Chapters 2-9, starting with the

    orientation of the reinforcement and type of matrix and ending with the

    influence oftheenvironment. In Chapters

    913

    aspects of structural testing and

    verification of the design are discussed.

    Whilst design information is derived throughout the text, the coupon data is

    collated and analysed in Chapter

    14.

    The standard curves can form the starting

    point for design purposes. The recommendations in Chapter15form a design

    check list; no doubt designers will add to this list as their experience grows. If

    the text is to be used as a source of information then the index, list of con tents,

    or summary tables in Chapter1should be consulted.

    A glossary is provided to define the technical term s used within the text and

    the industry. It is consistent with that adopted by the American ASM Inter

    national Handbook Committee being the most authoritative source available.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    15/272

    Preface

    The use of com posite materials for load-bearing structures is gradually gaining

    acceptance as knowledge is gained about their performance and durability.

    The idea is intrinsically simple - to utilize two (or more) constituents, which

    together have more attractive properties than the individual constituents.

    In this book, the use of two types of composite materials is considered;

    namely fibre reinforced plastics and, to a lesser extent, wood-com posites. The

    question of how these materials can be successfully incorporated into primary

    load-bearing structures is also addressed .

    The study is applied to the inclusion of such materials into wind turbine

    blades, which experience both static and dynamic (fatigue) loading. It is not

    merely the loads that must be withstood, but also the effects of the environm ent

    over prolonged periods of time.

    This work describes a systematic approach by engineers from seven Euro

    pean countries over a period of five years to elucidate the material and

    structural response to fatigue loading. M ethods of detecting the accumulation

    of damage over long periods of time a re also discussed.

    The information presented in this book will assist in the design of com posite

    structures against fatigue, though it will be necessary to characterize the

    material combination and manufacturing process used at the detailed design

    stage.

    With its low environmental impact, the generation of electricity from

    renewal energy sources will increasingly provide for the needs for the next

    millenium. This study will allow, inter alia, the next generation of wind

    turbines to be developed based on new designs of rotor b lades.

    Whilst this book is self-contained, the accompanying volumes by the editor

    (Design with Reinforced Plasticsand Design D ata for Reinforced Plastics,

    (Chapm an & Hall) may be consulted if readers are not familiar with the design

    process.

    As this work

    is

    on-going,

    we

    would hope that our experience and those of our

    readers could be incorporated in any future editions.

    Ray ner M Mayer

    Yateley 1995

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    16/272

    Acknowledgements

    Funding support was provided by:

    European Commission Directorate General XII - Science, Research,

    Development; contract number JO UR -0071-D K

    Danish Energy Agency

    Department of Trade and Industry, UK

    Jotun Polymer A/S, Norway

    Norges Vassdrags - og Energiverk, Norway

    NOVEM, Netherlands

    Research Council of Norway

    Renewable Energy Centre, NE L, UK

    Swedish National Board for Industrial and Technical Development

    Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Dept. Economie, Belgium

    Werkgelegenheid en Binnenlandse Aangelegenheden, Belgium

    and the Institutes and C ompanies to whom the authors are affiliated.

    We wish to acknowledge the support and assistance of the following:

    Giancarlo Caratti and Komninos Diamantaras, EC.DG XII

    Ragnar Arvesen, Jotun Polymer, Norway

    Geoffrey Dutton, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK

    Mark Hancock, Wind Energy Group Limited, UK

    Monica Jong, ECN , N etherlands

    W. Kurz, Aerodynamik Consult Company, Germany

    David Mayer, Sciotech, UK

    Jens-Peter Molly, DEWI, Germany

    Hans Reiter, DLR, Germany

    David Richmond, Flemings Industrial Fabrics, UK

    B.A .J. Schaap, ECN, N etherlands

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    17/272

    Notation

    Fabric

    and

    laminate notat ion

    Process

    SB -

    sti tch bonding

    FW

    -

    filament winding

    W

    -

    weaving

    I

    -

    inlaid

    CSM

    -

    chopped s t rand

    mat

    Nota t ion numbers

    -

    alignment angle

    or

    plies

    (numbers)

    -

    mass

    in g/m

    2

    letters

    -

    me thod

    of

    fabrication

    +

    -

    combination fabric

    s

    -

    symmetrical

    [p]

    -

    n u m b e r

    of

    plies

    Exam ple 1 Comb ination fabric.

    0/90

    SB

    (800)

    + CSM (100)

    / \ \

    alignment proc ess m ass combination p rocess m ass

    Example2 Biased fabric.

    0

    (567) / 90 (35)

    W

    /

    \ \ w

    alignment mass alignment mass process

    Example 3 Plied laminate.

    [45 W (250) / 0 (150) [4p]]s

    /

    \ \ / \

    alignment process mass plies symmetrical

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    18/272

    Units

    Properties

    Modulus

    (a) - (d)

    Stress

    Stress

    Strain (g)

    Poissons ratio

    Barcol hardness

    tensile

    flexural

    compressive

    torsional

    tensile

    flexural

    compressive

    torsional

    inter laminar shear

    minimum (e)

    maximum

    mean

    ampli tude

    minimum/maximum (f)

    Toughness ( impact s t rength)

    Fib re fraction -

    -

    by

    by

    Water absorpt ion

    Glass transition

    volume

    weight

    tempera ture

    Units

    GPa

    GPa

    GPa

    GPa

    MPa

    MPa

    MPa

    MPa

    MPa

    MPa

    MPa

    MPa

    MPa

    %

    J/m or

    %

    %

    %

    C

    Designator

    Ef

    E

    c

    G

    ,

    Of

    Oc

    -

    Omin

    Oman

    Ornean

    Oall

    R

    V

    B

    n

    J/m

    2

    Vf

    w,

    T

    g

    Notes

    (a) If a stress-strain curve is non-linear then one can measure the initial slope

    (tangent, Fig. 0.1) or the secant slope. For the latter, the strain range

    should be defined if it is not taken between zero and the failure strain.

    (b) Subscripts t, c, and f are used to designate tensile, compressive and flexura l

    loading, respectively.

    (c) Subscript f may also be used to designate

    thefatigue

    value of the modulus

    once the loading has been specified, e.g. E

    t f

    .

    (d) Parameters may be normalized by dividing their current value by their

    initial

    value.

    For exam ple, moduli may be normalizedbydividingE

    lf

    by ,.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    19/272

    Units

    y^

    //'

    < >

    y ^^r

    Tangent / ^ j

    1

    S^ T

    ^ < ^

    > ^ ,

    Secant

    |

    1

    1 |

    , ^Linear limit

    y

    Strain()

    Fig. 0.1 Determination ofthemodulus from the tangent or secant slope ofastress-strain curve

    (

    Time

    Fig. 0.2 Definition of the param eters used to define an alternating stress of constant amplitude .

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    20/272

    Units

    /Strain amplitude /Strain range

    Time

    Fig.

    0.3

    Definition

    of

    parameters used

    to

    define strain.

    As

    with

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    21/272

    CHAPTER 1

    Fatigue Considerations

    ft M.Mayer*

    Composite materials provide an optimum design solution to fabricating structures that move or

    rota te. The design principles are discussed with reference to fatigue loading. The selection and

    manufacture of such materialsisoutlined, together with the various aspects of fatigue tha t have

    been investigated.

    1.1 Introduction

    The composite m aterials discussed in this volume refer to two principal classes

    of materials, namely polymers reinforced by either fibres or wood veneers . In

    wood, the reinforcement

    is

    the cellulose microfibrils

    in

    the

    cell

    walls.

    The

    use of

    such reinforcements produces a range of properties which cannot be sustained

    by the matrixitself,such as stiffness, strength, and fatigue resistance (1)(2).

    The reinforcement provides the mechanical strength, whereas the matrix

    provides the means of transferring the load into and out of the reinforcement

    and protecting it against the environment. However, the choice of such

    materials is restricted by design requirements and consideration of shape,

    processing ability, and cost.

    In gene ral, the stiffness and strength of a composite increase with reinforce

    ment fraction up to some limiting value. For

    glass

    reinforced plastic (GR P) the

    reinforcement is typically 40-50 percent by volume, whilst for wood compo

    sites it is in excess of 80 percent as the glue line has negligible volume.

    Nevertheless, the material properties of these two groups are much closer to

    one another than to metals since they are both composite materials whose

    properties only arise as a result of lay-up.

    Common properties of wood andfibrecomposites include: high strength and

    stiffness to density ra tios; good environmental resistance; suitability for use in

    the rapid manufacture of large structures. Moreover, moulding direct to final

    shape facilitates assembly and minimizes wastage.

    The materials and structures discussed in this publication are typical of

    general applications in mechanical engineering in which composites are only

    slowly penetrating. As these have not yet been investigated to any significant

    exten t, designers have hitherto been very conservative in their designs.

    Sciotech, UK.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    22/272

    2 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    Laminated wooden beams have been used for some time as structural

    members for large-span trusses and roofs such as those in sport halls or

    swimming pools. These comprise wooden planks, typically 12-50 mm thick,

    glued together to give the appropriately shaped beam. Their loading is

    primarily static in na ture . For complex shaped structures such as wind turbine

    blades, wood veneers are used, typically 3-5 mm thick, and the loading is

    primarily dynamic in character.

    1.2 Design and manufacture

    Structures can be designed on the basis of British Standard BS 7000, in which

    the design is advanced in successive stages from conceptual through embodi-

    ment to detailing and issuing instructions for manufacture (3). The design

    sequence for proceeding to the em bodiment (or layout) stage is shown in Fig.

    1.1 (4).

    The na ture of composite m aterials

    is

    such that the selection of manufacturing

    processes, materials, and properties are interrelated; choice of any one may

    define the othertwo This reduces the design options by restricting the num ber

    of possible m aterial combinations.

    The fundamental design rule is to lay the reinforcement in the direction of

    the principal stresses and to check tha t the stresses in the other directions are

    such that the matrix has sufficient strength to withstand the loading. If the

    matrix a lone cannot w ithstand the subsidiary stresses then the reinforcement

    also needs to be laid in those directions.

    As the design evolves, one m ust check for

    fitness

    of purpose ; if this cannot be

    achieved, the structure, materials, or manufacturing process may need to be

    reassessed. As the sequence is iterated in successively greater depth, it is

    necessary to ensure that thereisno fundamental difficulty which would prevent

    the design from being released for manufacture.

    Manufacture

    The design of composite structures involves the interrelation of structural

    considerations, material properties, and processing. The processes listed in

    Table 1.1 are capable of producing large structures, though some of these have

    restrictions on the geom etrical shape (4).

    The most common process, and one that is also the most labour intensive, is

    that of

    contact

    m oulding, in which the dry reinforcement (fabric or veneer) is

    laid up in a mould and is then impregnated with resin and consolidated. In

    prepreg m oulding the reinforcement and resin are already intimately mixed

    and prepared in sheet form by the material supplier.

    Either fibres or fabric in the form of tape are used in thewinding technique

    and these are passed through a resin ba th before being laid on to a mandrel at

    the appropriate angle. They have a low labour content as automation is

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    23/272

    Fatigue Considerations

    Conceptual design

    Materials, processes

    l

    _-rzr

    Shape,

    form

    Load path, joints

    Resin, reinforcementtype andlay-up

    \

    Strength, stiffness

    Mass

    Durability

    Environmental impact

    L

    Embodiment design

    Fig. 1.1 The steps in establishing the embodiment from the conceptual design; dotted

    lines indicate stop and think before iterating the loop. The process needs to be

    repeated for the detailed design stage (4)

    Tab le 1.1 Principal man ufacturing processes

    for large structures

    Contact moulding

    Filament winding

    Tape winding

    Prepreg moulding

    Resin transfer moulding

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    24/272

    4 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    possible; spars for wind turbines of up to 40 m in length have been manufac

    tured by this method.

    Resintransferm ouldinginvolves laying up the reinforcement in the form of

    fabrics inside a mould, closing the mould, and injecting the catalyzed resin

    mixture. Once the resin has hardened, the com ponent can be demoulded with

    good surfaces all round.

    It is essential that components and structures are evolved which can be

    moulded or m anufactured directly to final shape . In this way no machining is

    required and the outer (moulded) surface can act as an environmental barrie r.

    Jointing

    The principal methods of jointing are glueing and bolting, and careful attention

    to design detail is required in order to ensure adequate load transfer between

    components. A key rule is that joints between dissimilar materials (such as

    composites and metals) should be located in areas of low stressing if at all

    possible.

    1.3 Fatigue considerations

    The fundamental response of composite materials to fluctuating loading

    (fatigue) is known (5) and has been characterized for some specific material

    combinations like carbon fibres in an epoxy matrix for aerospace applications.

    As with me tals, the load bearing capability decreases as the num ber of fatigue

    cycles increases.

    How ever, the way

    in

    which the dam age nucleates and grows

    is

    very different.

    In metals, a crack (or cracks) is nucleated and damage increases by crack

    growth. Owing to the anisotropic nature of com posites, one tends to

    find

    areas

    of damage arising, which can grow and eventually lead to failure.

    Following Reifsnider (5), it is believed that damage accumulates in three

    stages of varying time length (Fig. 1.2).

    During the initial load period (stage 1), there is generally a small drop in

    stiffness associated with the formation of

    some

    damage. This

    is

    followed (stage

    2) by a much longer time period in which the damage seems to increase linearly

    with time and the stiffness falls very gradually. If the stressissufficiently high, a

    third stage (3) is observed which is characterized by an ever increasing amount

    of damage which ultimately leads to failure.

    Substantiation

    Fatigue can be investigated in various ways:

    (a) increasing the size of the test piece from coupon through to com ponent;

    (b) increasing the complexity of loading from constant amplitude through to

    loading encountered in service;

    (c) or a com bination of (a) and (b) (Fig. 1.3).

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    25/272

    Fatigue Considerations

    ^

    ' Residual strength

    .Stiffness

    /

    -+-3

    10' 10 10* IV

    Cycles

    IV

    IV

    F i g . 1.2 Th e three chara cter i s t i c s tagesofd a m a g eofc o m p o s i t e s(5)

    - Stages

    The ultimate goalis toapply the service loadingto the complete structure

    (6). Such tests arecomplex and time consuming, but provide information

    which could only otherwise be ob tained by evaluation in service.

    The majority of tests arealwaysperformed on coupons for one or more of the

    following reasons:

    - low cost;

    - ability to use standard test machines and fixtures;

    - easeoftesting;

    - prospectoftestingathigh frequencies circa 5 Hzorhigher becauseofthe

    lower loads;

    - rapid investigation of various materials and lay-ups;

    - responseofa material to various typesofloading;

    - effectsofenvironment;

    - ability to obtain design allowable values for fatigue.

    All this information is necessaryinorder to be able to designastructure against

    fatigue.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    26/272

    Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    Increasing complexity

    of specimen

    Structures

    Components

    Specimens

    Coupons

    Basic

    fatigue

    data

    Goal

    Constant

    amplitude

    Variable

    amplitude

    Service

    loads

    -

    Increasing

    complexity

    of applied

    loads

    Fig. 1.3 Possibilities of fatigue testing in terms of increasing comp lexity of loads and com ponents

    (6)

    The inverse relationship between the number oftests,their complexity, and

    cost (called the pyramid of substantiation) (Fig. 1.4) was originally developed

    for aircraft components (7).

    A similar strategy has been adopted in the current investigations, that is a

    large number of tests on coupons and a much smaller number on components

    and structures.

    1.4 Structural design

    The design sequence for a load-bearing structure such as a rotor blade is

    illustratedin Fig. 1.5.

    The aerodynamic, structural, and manufacturing considerations are inter

    twined. Aerodynam ics will set the shape envelope from which the loads can be

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    27/272

    Fatigue Considerations

    Numberof tests

    40 60 80

    Relative cost (%)

    100

    Fig. 1.4 Substantiation of the design indicating the number of tests and the related costs for each

    stage of testing of a composite component for Airbus Industrie (7)

    Concept

    Regulation

    Blade number

    Location

    Terrain

    Wind conditions

    Load Calculations

    Simulations

    Static strength

    analysis

    zz

    Fatigue

    spectrum

    Fatigue life

    prediction

    Estimated life

    Fig. 1.5 The steps in establishing the ability of a rotor blade to withstand the imposed loadings

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    28/272

    8 Design of Com posite Structures Against Fatigue

    calculated for a specific wind regime. The blade structure has to withstand the

    imposed loads and transfer these loads to the shaft. The manufacturing process

    then has to ensure the production of the desired shape and the location of the

    reinforcement in appropriate directions.

    Material selection is dependent on the manufacturing process, and this in

    turn enables both static and fatigue properties to be determined. From these

    data, fatigue lives can be predicted from the knowledge of the load spectrum

    (Chapter 4). The structure has to withstand these loads with an adequate

    margin of safety (10). If the loading is too high, then the design has to be

    iterated.

    There are a number of codes governing the general principles of structural

    design, such as ISO 2394 and the Eurocodes (9 ) -( ll ). These are based on limit

    state analysis in which the designer has to identify the ways in which a structure

    fails to fulfil its function in terms of either ultimate loads or service loads.

    The uncertainties in loads and materials are considered by using partial

    safety coefficients. The value of these coefficients depends upon aspects such

    as:

    - material variability.

    - whether the damage is progressive or catastrophic.

    - whether the design is verified by testing.

    - inspection in service.

    - repairability.

    - lifetime reliability target.

    The methodsbywhich some of these aspects can be determ inedisillustrated in

    subsequent chapters.

    For wind turbines, the safety requirements have been set out in a new

    international design code IEC 1400-1 (12). It specifies inter alia the limits for

    the statistical analysis of the fatigue strength, and also makes allowance for

    whether a structure fails in a safe manner.

    Rotor

    blade design

    Owing to the diffuseness ofair,wind turbine blades need to be large in order to

    capture any appreciable am ount of energy from wind. For example, a turbine

    fitted with blades some 17 m in length would typically generate a maximum

    power output of500kW.

    For energy costs to be com petitive with o ther sources, it

    is

    essential to design

    the blade so that: (a) its mass is effectively used and (b) blades can be

    manufactured in a cost-effective manner (8).

    In the spar/shell design (Fig. 1.6), the spar is designed to be the prime load

    bearing member whilst the shell provides the aerodynamic shape and torsional

    stiffness (13). The spar is generally wound by a tape winding process with the

    filaments transverse to the length of tape (Fig. 9.2 in Chap ter9),the shell being

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    29/272

    Fatigue Considerations

    1

    Shell

    Spar

    Glass/polyester

    Gelcoat

    Fig. 1.6 Spar/shell design developed originally for the blades of the wind turbine erected at Nibe

    (13)

    Table 1.2 Evaluation of components

    Component

    Spar

    Blade root

    Flange type

    Trumpet, pin-hole

    Pin/hole

    T-bolt joint

    Flexhat

    Trumpet

    Purpose oftest

    Manufacturing evaluation

    Fatigue response

    Design verification

    Fatigue response

    Design verification

    Fatigue response

    Description

    (chapter)

    9

    10,12

    10

    13

    12

    10

    made by contact moulding in a mould (4). The advantage of this design is that

    each component can be separately optimized.

    The stiffened shell

    is

    more commonly used with one or m ore stiffeners in the

    form of webs (Fig. 7.2 in Chapter7and F ig. 13.3 in Chapter 13). As buckling

    can be a problem with such large structures, structural foam is often used

    between the skins of the shell to provide sufficient rigidity.

    Bladeroot

    The design of the blade root is complex as the torq ue from the blade has to be

    transferred onto the shaft, usually via a flange. There is also a change of

    ma terial, from composite to steel and, less comm only, to aluminium. Types in

    common use include the trumpet, pin-hole, pre-stressed T-bolt (IKEA type),

    and stud (14).

    The tests shown in Table 1.2 cover both existing and improved blade root

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    30/272

    10 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    Table 1.3 Ma terials and processes investigated

    Reinforcement

    Glass

    Aligned fibres at various

    angles

    Transverse filament tape

    Combination fabrics

    Woven and stitch

    bonded fabrics

    Balanced woven fabrics

    Glass/carbon

    Discrete layers of fabrics

    Wood

    Khaya

    Poplar

    Birch

    Beech

    Baltic pine

    Process

    Filament winding

    Tape winding

    Contact moulding

    Prepreg moulding

    Contact moulding-

    Contact moulding

    +

    Vacuum bagging

    Resin

    Ortho-Polyester

    Epoxy

    Iso-polyester

    Iso-polyester

    Iso-NPG polyester

    Vinyl ester

    Epoxy

    Iso-polyester

    Epoxy

    Iso-polyester

    Epoxy

    Description

    (chapter)

    2 ,

    4

    9

    3, 4

    3

    3

    3

    6

    5

    6

    7

    connections, and were evolved to validate designs as well as their structural

    response to load. These tests require large rigs, great care in introducing the

    load (s), and the imposition of loads greater than the maximum design load, in

    order to accelerate the test.

    1.5 Materials and evaluation

    Materials have been evaluated in the form of test plates manufactured by the

    appropriate process. They are typical of those in use in general mechanical

    engineering applications. F abric types have included w oven, inlaid, and stitch-

    bonded (4) whilst fibre orientations varied from unidirectional to balanced

    fabrics in the warp and weft directions. These are summarized in Table 1.3.

    The following design aspects outlined below have been considered.

    - Fibre alignment through manufacturing laminate plates by the filament

    winding process in a laboratory . Consequently these values will set an upper

    limit to what could be achieved in a factory environment (Chapter 2) .

    -

    Matrix

    and fabric

    construction

    using various types of matrices with the same

    type of reinforcem ent and various fabrics with the same resin. This provides

    a link with other matrix systems such as vinyl ester and epoxy, whose

    structural app lications a re more widely known (Chapter 3).

    -

    Hum idity andmoisture

    as laminates can take up w ater under high humidity

    and conversely give up water under very dry conditions. The amount of

    water absorbed or desorbed has been measured and the effect on properties

    determ ined. Since these measurements were made on thin coupons, they set

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    31/272

    Fatigue Considerations 11

    an upper limit to what could occur with structures where the laminates are

    thicker and have fewer edges (C hapters 5 , 11).

    -

    Impact damage

    of ice particles has been investigated using an 'ice gun'

    as well as the combined effect of moisture penetration and damage

    (Chapter 5).

    - Spectral loading on rotor blades is generally evaluated using a load set

    averaged over a number of different types of turbines. It is designated

    WISPER. The relationship of this spectrum to a truncated spectrum

    (WISPERX) and constant amplitude loading has also been investigated

    (Chapter 4).

    - Hybridfabricscomprise m ixtures ofglassand carbon fibres, as carbon fibres

    are appreciably stiffer than glassfibres.Thus a combination of thesefibresn

    a resin matrix could provide advantages in terms of obtaining the best

    prope rties of bothfibres,yet at lower cost than that of carbon alone (Chapter

    6).

    - Boltedjoints.Bolting introduces compressive and shear stresses, which are

    superimposed on the other loads seen by the blade rotor. This has been

    studied for both glass and hybrid fabrics (Chapter 6).

    - Wood composites.Various design aspects are considered including veneer

    type,

    jointing, and spectral loading (C hapter 7 ).

    - Effect of

    scale

    on going from coupons to components has been investigated

    for tape wound coupons and spars. Difficulties can arise with the quality of

    manufacture, the degree of alignment of the fabric or veneer, the m ethod of

    load introduction, and the method of testing (Chapter 9).

    1.6 Data collection and analysis

    There

    is

    still incomplete agreem ent for the static testing of composites and even

    less for fatigue testing. Consequently, each institute has tended to develop its

    own test methods, which will be internally consistent and

    valid.

    For

    this

    reason,

    a benchmark test has been undertaken to validate the consistency of tensile and

    flexural test methods (Chapter 8).

    Many engineers represent fatigue results by normalizing a property by its

    initial value; this may be stress, modulus or the number of cycles to failure.

    Normalized data need to be converted to engineering units in order to establish

    permissible values for design purposes. This approach has been developed by

    Sims (15) (amongst othe rs) to cover various aspects of fatigue loading, testing,

    and component geometry. In this work, strain

    is

    generally used . This approach

    also facilitates comparison between data sets and helps to establish trends and

    design principles.

    The scatter in the data can be evaluated by statistical methods, and this is

    discussed in Chapter 14. The confidence in the data and the probability of

    survival are designated by limits, which are generally prescribed by design

    codes (9)-(12). Following IEC 1400-1, these limits have been calculated for

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    32/272

    12 Design of Com posite Structures Against Fatigue

    Table 1.4 PrincipalNDEtechniques

    Description

    Technique Cause (chapter)

    Visual Multiple 2-13

    Stiffness change Overall change in stiffness 3-9

    Strain gauges Local change in stiffness 9, 10, 12,13

    Hysteresis in area under damping Change in load-rdeflection curve 2 ,3 ,7 ,9

    Resonant frequency Overall change in vibration of component 9

    Tem perature rise Local increase in temperature 9

    Infra-red emission Local areas which contain damage 7, 9, 10, 13

    95 percent survival probability and 95 percent confidence limits and are

    given for relevant data sets. Other limits could be used depending upon the

    design philosophy. This is discussed further in Chapter 15.

    1.7 Non-destructive evaluation (NDE)

    A variety of NDE techniques can be used to monitor the accumulation of

    damage (Table 1.4). Of these ,

    visual inspectionis

    the most straightforward and

    is also the most important. Cracks and damage areas a re readily visible as most

    of the coupons and com ponents are translucent to transmitted light.

    Localstrains

    can be determined by strain gauges and this has been exten

    sively used for all structural testing where damage generally occurs on a local

    scale rather than a global scale (C hapter10).Some institutes also use these for

    coupon tests to determ ine extension ra ther than using extensometers or cross-

    head deflection of an actuator.

    Stiffness

    has been m onitored throughout the study. This enables the damage

    stages to be identified (Fig. 1.2), and any deflection limit to be maintained. For

    coupons, changes in the modulus can be determined from the stress-strain

    curve, either during fatigue testing or by static loading.

    The load-deflection curve which characterizes a material or structure can be

    used to determine the hysteresis damping (Fig. 1.7). For composites the

    internal dam ping is much higher than metals and is an indicator of dam age in

    the material.

    Resonant frequency and natural frequency are also two methods of

    measuring the damping. They provide information at a global level ofthestate

    of the material or structure at micro-level.

    Damage induced in composites will generate heat and as these materials

    have poor conductivity it should be generally easy to detect. Infra-red

    emissions

    can be detected with a suitable camera and will locate the areas of

    damage and how these will grow. Thermocouples are simple to install and have

    been placed in locations where high strains have been detected, possibly by a

    strain survey (Chapter 9).

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    33/272

    Fatigue Con sideratio ns 13

    Average dynamic

    modulus

    Hysteresis

    damping

    Strain

    Fig. 1.7 A typical load-deflection curve showing the averag e dynam ic mod ulus and the hysteresis

    damping

    Such N DE techniques can also be used to decide a suitable failure criterion.

    As composite structures are generally stiffness-limited com pared with metals,

    a substantial drop in stiffness may be sufficient for the structure to have

    effectively 'failed'.

    For wind turbine blades, the majority of which are generally positioned

    upwind of the tower to avoid the effect of the tower shadow on the loading, a

    sufficient loss of stiffness could, for example, result in insufficient clearance

    between the blade and the tower.

    1.8 Conclusions

    Com posite materials like wood-veneer laminates and fibre reinforced plastics

    have similar manufacturing techniques and similar prop erties. The strategy for

    identifying the influence of specific fatigue parameters is outlined and the

    framework is sketched within which the testing and evaluation has been

    undertaken.

    Coupon data are analysed in individual chapters and are subsequently

    gathered together in Chapter14to permit a more detailed statistical analysis.

    The principal observations and

    findings

    are assessed in Chapter15to provide a

    set of recom mendations for good working practices.

    References

    (1 ) R IC H A R D S O N , T . , 1987 ,

    Composites: a design guide

    (Industrial Press, New York).

    (2 ) D IN W O O piE , J . M . , 1981 ,

    Timber, its nature and behaviour

    (Van Nost rand, New York) .

    (3 )

    Guide to managing product design,

    BS 7000, 1991 (BSI, Milton Keynes).

    (4) MAYER, R . M. , 1993,

    Design with reinforced plastics

    (Chapman & Hal l , London) .

    (5) RE IFS NID ER , K. F . (Edi tor ) , 1991,

    Fatigue of comp osite materials

    (Elsevier , Am sterdam ).

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    34/272

    14 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    (6) HAIBACH, E.

    1981,

    Fatigue data for design applications in materials, experimentation and

    design in fatigue,

    Fatigue

    Conference.

    (7) SCH NEIDER, K. and LAN G, R . W ., 1990, Secondary source qualification of carbon fibre

    prepregs for primary and secondary Airbus structures, 11th SAMPE Conference.

    (8) PRETLOVE, A. J. and MAYER, R. M., 1994, Rotor size and mass - the dilemma for

    designers of

    WECS,

    Wind

    Engineering

    18,

    317-28.

    (9) General principles on reliability for structures, ISO 2394,1986 (ISO , Geneva).

    (10) Basis of design, Eurocode 1, part

    1,1995

    (CEN , B russels).

    (11) Design of wooden structures, Eurocode 5, 1995 (CE N, Brussels).

    (12) Wind turbine generator systems. Part 1. Safety requirements, IEC 1400-1, 1994 (IEC,

    Geneva).

    (13) JOHANSEN, . S., LILHOLT, H, and LYSTRUP, Aa, 1980, Wingblades of glass fibre

    reinforced polyester fora 630kW w indturbine,Third International Conference on Composite

    Materials, (Elsevier, Amsterdam).

    (14) SANDBERG, O., 1989,Blade rootdesign,a stateofthe artsurvey, (FFA, Stockholm).

    (15) SIMS, G. D. and GLA DM AN, D . G., 1978,Effect o ftest conditions on the fatigue strength

    of a glass-fabric laminate.Plasticsan dRubber 1978, p.122etseq.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    35/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    36/272

    16 Design of Compo site Structures Against Fatigue

    Table 2.1 Materials

    Glass fibres

    Type

    Designation

    Supplier

    Diameter

    Density

    Stiffness

    Strength

    Failure strain

    Bundle characteristics

    Surface treatment/coating

    E-glass

    RPA 38 20/21EC12-300

    Skandinavisk Glasfiber

    12/im

    2.615g/cm

    3

    70-72 GPa

    -2000 MPa

    ~3 percent

    300tex; 1000filamentsper tow

    For polyester

    Polyester

    Type

    Designation

    Supplier

    Density

    Modulus

    Ultimate tensile strength

    Failure strain

    Characteristics

    Unsaturated polyester

    UP333 and A lpolit UPS294V

    Hoechst/Polyplex

    -1.213

    g/cm

    3

    -4 GPa

    -100

    MPa

    3-5 percent

    General polyester for glassfibres

    These straight-fibre configurations of nominally continuous fibres can all be

    fabricated

    by a

    winding technique (described below)

    ; this

    ensures

    a

    high degree

    of similarity in fabrication of all composite materials, and comparisons can be

    made more easily and with greater confidence.

    The fatigue loadings on the wingblades are mainly caused by the wind

    fluctuations, causing flap-w ise bending of the wingblades, and by the gravity

    loading, causing edge-wise bending of the wingblades during rotation. The

    type of fatigue loading seen by the blades is tension-tension fatigue (R = 0.1)

    and compression-compression fatigue (R = 10), both due to wind loads; in

    addition tension-compression fatigue

    (R =

    1) is caused by gravity.

    During fatigue loading of materials in genera l, and com posites in particular,

    the m icrostructure, i.e.,fibre-configuration,may undergo changes. The effect

    of such damage is recorded and studied through changes in the material

    stiffness and in the development and change in the hysteresis-loops (stress-

    strain loops during cyclic loading).

    2.2 Materials

    Characteristics

    The constituent m aterials used to fabricate the composites are listed in Table

    2.1.

    The composites for wingblades are represented by several series of glass/

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    37/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    38/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    39/272

    Properties of Compos ites with Long Fibres

    19

    fcla'i ' ' '

    it^jjjLiiiaiiiitliiaii

    a I

    (b)

    'M't'iVrMVi'ri'iiVrrrrtVi'iVi'i'

    Fig. 2.1(a) Specimen for static and fatigue testing of comp osites with moderate strength. Dimen-

    sions in mm . (b) Specimen for static and fatigue testing of composites w ith high strength

    (large fraction of fibres in the 0 degree direction). Dimensions in mm

    The load application during mechanical charac terization is made by hydraulic

    control, both for monotonic (static) and cyclic (fatigue) loading. The load is

    monitored continuously during testing.

    The strain is recorded via two extensometers mounted on either side,

    respectively, of the specim en; they are electrically coupled to give the net axial

    strain, and thus to eliminate any possible bending strain induced in the

    specimen. The (net) strain is recorded continuously during testing.

    The mechanical characterization of the composite materials is made accord-

    ing to the plan presen ted in Table 2.3 .

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    40/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    41/272

    Properties of Com posites with Long Fibres 21

    Table 2.4 Monotonie (static) tests

    Material

    (volume fraction

    of fibres

    50

    percent)

    G/poly 0 degrees

    10 degrees

    45 degrees

    60 degrees

    0 7

    10

    degrees

    030 degrees

    045 degrees

    G/poly (benchmark)

    Stiffness

    E

    GPa

    47.2

    40.9

    17.4

    15.4

    42.0

    30.4

    37.2

    23.8

    Tension

    Strength

    2 .6

    1.9

    Monotonic

    (static) testing

    Tensile and compressive testing is made in the following cases and with the

    parameters:

    - tempera ture 20C

    - humidity 'natu ral'

    - displacement rate 0.5 mm/min

    - strain rate ~ 8 x 1 0

    - 4

    sec~ '

    - stress-strain curve is recorded

    - stiffness, E,is calculated as initial slope of the stress-strain curve

    - strength at failure, o

    u

    , is calculated

    - strain at failure, E

    U

    is calculated

    The results of mechanical characterization are given as stiffness E,strength ,

    and strain e

    u

    in Table 2.4.

    The stress-strain curves for some of the composites are shown in Fig.2.3;in

    general fibre orientation has a large effect, such that0degree o rientation gives

    high values of stiffness and strength, while the off-axis orien tations 45degrees,

    60 degrees) are responsible for very low values. The combination of orien

    tations, such as 0 degrees and 45 degrees, gives values dominated by the

    0 degree orientation.

    The data under monotonic (static) loading are of the expected level, and

    serve as quality-control of the glass/polyester composites. The stress-strain

    curves, both in tension and in compression, are of the 'no rm al' type and shape.

    Cyclic (fatigue) testing

    Tests are m ade in the following cases and with the parameters:

    - tension-tension R = o

    mm

    /o

    mux

    =0.1

    - compression-compression R = o

    mm

    /o

    m

    .

    M

    = 10

    - tempera ture 20C

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    42/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    43/272

    Properties of Com posites with Long Fibres 23

    Table 2.5 Cyc lic fatigue) tests

    Glass/polyester, comparisons

    Fatigue Com posites Fibre orientations Figure

    ratio

    R

    0 .1 ;

    10

    0 .1 ;

    10

    0.1

    0.1

    10

    0.1

    0.1

    G/poly

    **

    G/poly (benchmark)

    All

    0/30

    0 ; 1 0 ; 4 5 ; 6 0

    0 ; 0 / 1 0 ; 0 / 3 0 ; 0 / 4 5

    0 / 1 0 ; 0 / 3 0 ; 0 / 4 5

    0; 10; 0 /10

    Wa rp biased

    2.4(a)

    2.4(b)

    2.4(c)

    2.4(d)

    2.4(e)

    2.4(f)

    2.4(g)

    maximum load; the minimum load is calculated via the prescribed R ratio.

    These loads are used as load-control parameters during fatigue testing.

    The initial maximum straine

    max

    is used in the diagrams (S-N curves). The

    results of the mechanical characterization are presented in similar fatigue

    diagrams. These are plots oftheinitial maximum strain versus the logarithm of

    number of cycles; for compressive loading the numerical, maximum strain is

    used. The results are presented such that comparisons are made easy, i.e.,

    diagrams are plotted on the same scale, and a reference line is used; this

    reference is the fatigue curve for glass/polyester composite with a fibre

    orientation of 0 degrees, tested at R = 0.1 (tension-tension fatigue). Several

    series and comparisons are listed in Table 2.5.

    The data for cyclic (fatigue) loading are presented and compared in a series

    of diagrams (Fig. 2.4). The glass/polyester lam inates form a large group of data

    and allow several types of comparisons.

    The overview of all data in Fig. 2.4(a) shows the general shape of the S-N

    curves, with a possible fatigue limit at cycles beyond

    IO

    7

    10

    8

    cycles. The curves

    are approximately straight lines with a slope which (numerically) decreases at

    increasing values for the fibre orientations. This behaviour allows for simple

    analytical expressions to be established for the S-N curves, and this leads to

    potential design values for fatigue up to about 10

    7

    cycles.

    The comparison (Fig. 2.4(b)) of tension-fatigue (R

    =

    0.1) and com pression-

    fatigue(R =

    10)

    shows, generally, that there

    is

    little difference between tension

    and compression. The tendency is that at fibre orientations close to zero

    composites are stronger in tension than in compression, while at fibre orien

    tations near 90 degrees, the compressive fatigue strength is higher than the

    tensile fatigue strength.

    The individual comparisons for glass/polyester are made by comparisons of

    'rela ted ' composites under the same loading type and are illustrated in the Figs

    2.4(c)-2.4(f).

    For angle ply laminates (Fig. 2.4(c)) the fatigue strength reduction is small

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    44/272

    24 Design of Com posite Structures Against Fatigue

    + 0 degrees = 0.1

    10

    degrees

    o45 degrees

    x 60 degrees

    0/45

    0/45

    R=

    10

    Ull i

    10

    (b)

    _L

    +

    R

    = 0.1

    R

    = 10

    10

    IV

    IV

    Cycles

    IV

    IV

    10'

    10

    Fig. 2.4(a) Fatigue diagrams of maximum nom inal strain versus logarithm of number of cycles to

    failure, for glass/polyester composites - all composites al

    K

    = 0.1 and

    R

    = 10. (b)

    Fatigue diagrams of maximum nominal strain versus logarithm of number of cycles to

    failure, for glass/polyester com posites-0 d egre e/3 0 degree composites at

    R

    = 0.1 and

    R

    = 10

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    45/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    46/272

    26

    Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    2.5

    ( e )

    os

    (f)

    o J -

    10

    10

    degreesR= 0.1

    0 degrees 10 degrees

    ffl 0 degrees 30 degrees

    =

    10

    A 0 degrees 45 degrees

    10' 10' IV

    Cycles

    10

    s

    10' 10'

    -0 degrees

    o

    0 10 degrees

    O 10 degrees

    = < u

    10' IO

    3

    IO

    4

    Cycles

    10'

    10' 10'

    10'

    10

    F i g . 2 . 4 ( e ) F a t i g ue d i a g ra m s o f m a x i m u m no m i na l s t ra in v ers us l o g a r i thm of num ber o f cy c l e s to

    fa i l ure , f o r g l a s s / po l y es t er co m po s i t e s - 0 deg ree , 0 deg ree / 1 0 deg ree , 0 deg ree / 3 0

    deg ree , a nd 0 de g r ee / 4 5 deg ree co m p o s i t e s a t R = 10 . ( f ) Fat igu e diag ram s of

    m a x i m um no m i na l s t ra i n v ers us l o g a r i thm o f num ber o f cy c l e s t o fa i l ure , f o r g l a s s /

    po l y es t er co m po s i t e s - 0 deg ree , 1 0 deg ree , a nd 0 deg ree / 1 0 deg ree co m po s i t e s a t

    = 0.1

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    47/272

    Properties of Com posites with Long Fibres

    27

    2.5

    0.5

    -i r

    -

    1 1 r

    -0 degrees

    '

    I I ml

    10

    IV IV IV

    Cycles

    IV IV

    10'

    10

    Fig. 2.4(g) Fatigue diagram s of maximum nom inal strain versus logarithm of number of cycles to

    failure, for glass/polyester composites - combination fabric (benchmark) at

    R =

    0.1

    for angles of about10deg rees, while itislarge for45degree and60degree fibre

    orientations.

    For combination laminates with a significant fraction of 0 degree oriented

    fibres the fatigue strength for R = 0.1 is practically unaffected by the angje

    oriented fibres, as seen in Fig. 2.4(d) for R = 0.1 (tension-fatigue) while a

    clear reduction in fatigue strength is recorded in Fig. 2.4(e) for R= 10

    (com pression-fatigue), when the angle orientation is increased.

    The comparison of laminates with0degree

    fibres

    and angle

    fibres

    forR= 0.1

    (tension-fatigue)isseen in Fig. 2.4(f) for angles of10degrees. The presence of

    0 degree fibres ensures fatigue strength values close to those of 'pure'0degree

    laminates.

    The results for the glass/polyester (benchmark) atR0.1 (Fig. 2.4(g)) are

    displaced below the reference line, which is probably caused by the imperfect

    manufacturing of this practical m aterial, made under industrial conditions.

    Stiffness reduction

    In most tests the stiffness changes are recorded regularly during fatigue testing,

    typically at every tenth of a decade of cycles. The results are displayed in

    diagrams showing stiffness reduction,E/E

    0

    , versus normalized lifetime (num-

    ber of cycles), both with a linear parameter (Fig. 2.5(a)) and logarithmic

    parameter (Fig. 2.5(b)). This figure shows the same data plotted in two

    different ways. The real-time plot (Fig. 2.5(a)) also shows that the steep

    reduction in modulus starts at about 85 percent of the (normalized) lifetime,

    while the logarithmic plot (Fig. 2.5(b)) obscures this situation, although such

    plots are often used for presentation of fatigue data.

    The reduction in stiffness during fatigue loading

    is

    an indirect measure of the

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    48/272

    28

    Desi g n

    of

    Com posi te Structures Against Fat igue

    1.0

    0.9

    1

    1

    0.7

    o

    0.6

    0.5

    (a)

    1 1 1 ~i ; 1 r

    I

    I I I I

    I

    I I

    0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

    Normalized lifetime (N/N

    (

    )

    (b)

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

    Normalized lifetime (logAVlogN

    t

    )

    0.8

    0.9 1.0

    Fig. 2.5(a) Stiffness reduction diagram , with normalized stiffness

    ElE

    B

    versus normalized lifetime

    ;V/,V

    f

    for 0 degree/30 degree composites, fatigue tested at

    R

    = 10 with a maximum

    strain of 0.8 percent, (b) Stiffness reduction diagram, with normalized stiffness

    /-. //',,

    versus normalized logarithmic lifetime log '/log /V

    r

    for 0 degree/30 degree compo

    sites,

    fatigue tested at

    R

    = 10 with a maximum strain of 0.8 percent

    damage (cracks, delaminations) produced in the material. The selected results

    show that a slow reduction in stiffness occurs during most of the life-time, and

    that a final, rather fast, reduction takes place before failure.

    Hysteresisloopchange

    In selected tests, the hysteresis loops (- loops) are recorded at intervals

    during fatigue testing. An example of the results is shown in Fig. 2.6, typically

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    49/272

    Properties of ompo sites with Long Fibres

    29

    0.75 1.0

    Strain (%)

    1.75

    Fig. 2.6 Hysteresis loop diag ram , for com posite under fatigue testing of maxim um initial strain of

    1.0 p ercent. For cycle 1, the modulus is 31.2 G Pa; after 74 ,935 cycles, 24 .9 GPa and after

    290,925 cycles, 18.0 GPa

    as the first hysteresis loop at the start of fatigue testing and the loop after, a

    specific number of cycles.

    It is noted that the following phenomena occur as the number of cycles

    increases:

    (a) the loop area increases;

    (b) the loop slop e (equivalen t to the stiffness) de creas es;

    (c) the minim um strain and the maxim um strain increase.

    Similar results are found with other composites (see Chapter 9). The last

    ph eno m eno n is a shift on th e loop in the

    -

    dia gra m , this is a result of the fact

    that the fatigue testing is under

    load

    control and that the material stiffness is

    reduced. For the numerical values of stress and strain the following relations

    hold

    R - o

    m

    Jo

    maii

    P .

    =

    min

    rl

    min

    'm ax t ' max

    m in

    =

    O

    mm

    L

    = (P

    mm

    IA)IE

    m ax

    =

    o

    max

    lb . = (r

    max

    /A)IL

    Th e last two relations show that both

    m in

    and

    m a x

    increase when

    E

    is reduc ed,

    and that the increase is largest for e

    m a x

    (because

    P

    m ; i x

    > P

    min

    .

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    50/272

    30

    Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    ss

    f

    Initial y ^

    ^ ^ After

    N

    cycles

    Strain

    Fig . 2.7 Schem atic hy steresis loo ps at (/:" and V =

    1 )

    and at cycle

    ' (E

    and

    N); E

    is the elastic

    modulus (approximately equal to 'slope' of loop), ' is cycle number; the Rratio is 0.1

    The 'loop-slope'isexpected to ex trapolate to , = 0,0. (Fig. 2.7): thisisnot

    the case for several of the hysteresis loop results. This could be caused by

    experim ental e rror at the start of (fatigue) testing, by an initial state of internal

    stressinthe composites, and by changesinthese internal stresses during fatigue

    loading.

    2.4 Significance for design

    These results set upper limits for those data which can be obtained under

    commercial manufac ture, asfilamentwinding produces highly orientated, high

    quality laminates. The best way of comparing fatigue data is nominal strain

    versus the logarithm of cycles.

    Orientation

    The effect of

    fibre

    orientationisclear -thehigher the angle to the loadaxis,the

    lower the nominal strain for any given number of cycles.

    Having somefibresying along the load axis and some

    fibres

    at an angleisthe

    best design practice. The tensile fatigue data presented on the basis of strain

    show the sam e fatigue curves for all laminates with a substantial proportion of

    0 degree fibres (typically 50-100 percent). For the designer the load-carrying

    capacity

    is

    of

    importance,

    and therefore the stiffness

    is also

    significant

    ;

    this calls

    for

    a

    modera te proportion of off-axisfibreso avoid

    a low

    modulus and thus low

    fatigue strength. Ideally, the off-axis fibres should be orientated to resist the

    off-axis loads.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    51/272

    Properties of Com posites with Long Fibres 31

    Loading

    Com posites are better able to withstand tensile than compressive loading, even

    if the laminate contains fibres lying along the loading axis. In general,

    composites in service will be subjected to a mixture of tensile and compressive

    loading. The fatigue properties of reverse loading (tension/compression)

    would thus be less than that of pure tensile loading, as can be seen in Fig. 8.5.

    The effect of spectral loading, which is a combination of compressive and

    tensile loading, is discussed in Chapter 4.

    Damage accumulation

    Stiffness is an important property for designers, because it governs the

    (maximum) deflection during loading. The reduction in stiffness is thus an

    important consideration for long-time design. The curves ofE IE

    0

    versus

    log

    N

    f

    (Fig. 2.5) can lead to design-allowables for cases where a maximum reduction

    in stiffness can be accepted, and the curves can be used to establish the

    corresponding number of cycles. Alternatively, the point of the curve where

    the fast reduction starts may be used as a design-allowable, if the actual

    stiffness at that point can be accepted.

    The hysteresis loops can also be correlated to temperature changes (in

    creases) during fatigue loading, and such recordings can serve as damage-

    monitoring techniques. These may be developed into practical methods to be

    used in service.

    Both of these damage parameters are discussed further in subsequent

    chapters (for example, Chapters 7 and 9).

    2.5 Conclusions

    The fatigue of well-orientated fibre com posites shows a characteristic decrease

    in properties as a function of

    time.

    Some

    fibres

    n the primary loading direction

    are beneficial in terms of fatigue propertie s. Such com posites are better able to

    withstand tensile than compressive fatigue.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    52/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    53/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    54/272

    34

    Design of Com posite Structures Against Fatigue

    Tab le 3.1 Description of laminates

    Laminate

    Code

    Combi iso

    Combi NPGiso

    Combi vinyl

    Combi rub-vinyl

    Combi Ortho

    CSM

    SB-Combi

    MA-O

    MA-90

    MA-0/90

    M A - 4 5

    Resin type

    lso-polyester

    NPG/iso-polyester

    Vinyl ester

    Rub.mod. vinyl ester

    Ortho-polyester

    NPG/iso-polyester

    NPG/iso-polyester

    NPG/iso-polyester

    NPG/iso-polyester

    NPG/iso-polyester

    NPG/iso-polyester

    1

    Layup*

    [[0(400),90(400)WR ],((100CSM)]SB].,

    [[0(4O0),90(400)WR],[(100CSM)]SB]

    5

    [[0(400),90(400)WR],[(100CSM)]SB].,

    [[0(400),90(400)WR],[(100CSM)]SB],

    [[0(400),90(400)WR],[(100CSM))SB]

    5

    [(100CSM)],,

    [0(400),90(400),(100CSM)]SB]

    5

    [0(578),90(14)I].,

    S

    [90(578),0(14)I],

    5

    [0(400).90(40)I].

    [+45(400) , -45(400)K]. ,

    s

    Fibre

    weight

    fraction

    (%)

    53

    51

    53

    52

    53

    31

    64

    54

    54

    53

    53

    Fraction of

    fibres in

    load

    direction

    (%)

    45

    45

    45

    45

    45

    Random

    45

    98

    :

    50

    (1

    'Notes:

    For layup conventions refer to Table 0.1

    SB fabric Rovimat 800/100 (Chomarat)

    Multiaxial knitted fabrics (Devoid AMT)

    Table 3.2 Resin properties from Jotun Polymer (5)

    T y p e

    T e n s i l e M o d u l u s ( G P a )

    T ens i l e S treng th (MP a )

    E l o ng a t i o n a t brea k (% )

    F l ex ura l mo dul us (G P a )

    Flexural s trength (MPa)

    Ortho

    polyester

    N P 4 1 - 9 0

    3.6

    65

    3.7

    3 .3

    125

    so polyester

    N P 7 2 - 9 0

    3.7

    7 6

    3.5

    3 .6

    135

    NPG/iso

    polyester

    N P 2 0 - 8 0

    3.6

    73

    6.5

    3

    124

    Vinyl ester

    N P 9 2 - 2 0

    3.3

    8 0

    5

    3.1

    130

    Rubber

    modified

    vinyl ester

    N P 9 2 - 4 0

    2.9

    6 8

    9

    2.8

    125

    All resins were supplied by Jotun Polymer

    bonded together. Five different resins were used - three polyester based and

    two vinyl ester based; their properties are listed in Table 3.2 (5). The resins

    differ from the greatest extent in their elongation to break (3-9 pe rcent).

    The other six laminates were m ade to study the influence of different fabric

    layups with the same resin (NPG-iso polyester). These comprised a stitch

    bonded combination mat (SB) and the chopped strand mat by itself and four

    laminates of inlaid construction having straight glass fibres held together by

    polyester yarns.

    Laminates MA-0 have 98 percent of their fibres running parallel to and 2

    percent normal to the load direction. M A-90 is the same laminate as M A -0,

    but tested perpendicular to the m ain fibre direction. MA-0/90 is a cross plied

    multi-axial laminate with the same amount of fibres running parallel and

    normal to the load direction. Laminate M A - 45 is laminate M A-0/90 rotated

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    55/272

    Influence of Matrix and Fabric 35

    Grips

    Anti-buckling

    Q t l supports

    Support jig

    Specimen

    V\

    Extensometer

    m

    Grips

    Specimen

    Fig. 3.1 Experimen tal set-up for coupon fatigue tests

    by45degrees. The MA laminates were also used to obtain basic ply properties

    for laminate theory calculations.

    All tests were performed on a servo-hydraulic MTS testing machine.

    Specimens were cut as straight 25 x 5 x 270 mm coupons from the lam inate,

    according to ISO 3268. In order to prevent buckling in compression an

    antibuckling device similar to the support jig of ASTM 695 was used. Dimen

    sionsof the device had to be slightly changed toalength of140 mmand w idthof

    25 mm to fit the specimens; there is no standard procedure for G RP tens ion-

    compression fatigue tests (Fig. 3.1). The gap between the antibuckling device

    and the grips

    was

    kept

    as

    small

    as

    possible (less than

    2mm).

    This set-up w orked

    well for most specim ens, but thin specimens with highly oriented fib res had the

    tendency to fail in the gap between the antibuckling device and

    grips.

    In those

    cases an ex tra set of metal supports was inserted into the test fixture, as shown

    in F ig.3.1.These supports closed the gap near thegrips.The slit in the middle

    ofthesupports, withitsorientation a t45degrees to the specimen, did not seem

    to cause any buckling of the specimen in compression.

    Strains were measured with an MTS Model 632.12C-20 extensometer,

    attached to the edge of the specimen. Stress-strain curves could be taken

    continuously by a com puterized data acquisition system. Testing rates of quasi

    static tests were 2 mm/min for tensile and compressive tests. Frequencies of

    fatigue tests were varied between 2 and 5 Hz to keep the average load rate

    about constant, avoiding viscoelastic effects. Low frequencies were chosen to

    prevent the specimens from heatingup.All fatigue testingwasdone in the load

    control mode.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    56/272

    36

    Design of Com posite Structures Against Fatigue

    Table 3.3 Static properties of laminates

    Laminate code

    Combi iso

    Combi NPG/iso

    Com bi vinyl

    Combi rub-vinyl

    Combi ortho

    CSM

    SB-Combi

    MA-0

    MA-90

    MA-0/90

    M A - + 4 5

    Linear

    Young s

    modulus

    (GPa)

    17.1 0.4

    16/1 0.4

    16.8 0.5

    16.9 0.7

    17.3 0.7

    8.4 0.4

    16.0 0.7

    28.3 0.7

    10.6 0.4

    20.4 1.0

    10.4 0.3

    Strain at

    linear

    limit

    (%)

    0.28

    0.34

    0.38

    0.33

    0.30

    -

    0.32

    *

    0.13

    0.13

    -

    Ultimate

    tensile

    strength

    (MPa)

    209 20

    205 6

    227 5

    237 14

    226 7

    125 1

    250 16

    602 8

    7 1 2

    366 25

    6 0 5

    Strain at

    tensile

    failure

    (%)

    1.40 0.20

    1.62 0.12

    1.72 0.03

    1.68 0.07

    1.77 0.10

    1.61 0.03

    2.25 0.06

    2.34 0.30

    2.35 0.20

    2.50 0.30

    >12

    Ultimate

    compr.

    strength

    (MPa)

    209 9

    258 14

    288 25

    259 14

    294 23

    211 6

    248 10

    >450

    8 3 2

    285 30

    9 0 8

    *no linear limit

    3.3 Static properties

    Static properties of all laminates were m easured in tension and compression.

    Tensile static curves can be characterized by an initially linear s lope, the linear

    limit, and ultimate failure properties (Fig. 3.2). These param eters are listed for

    all laminates in Table 3.3. Tensile elastic moduli , w ere taken as the slope of

    the linear part of the stress-strain curve. The linear limit was defined as the

    stress-strain level when data points drop significantly below the line defining

    the linear modulusE

    t

    .This is taken as a10percent d rop of the secant modulus

    from theE

    t

    value. Note that the MA-0 laminate with 98 percent of its fibres

    running in the load direction does not show a linear limit based on this

    definition. Typical tensile stress-stra in curves are shown in

    Fig.

    3.3for NPG/iso

    laminates.

    Different resinswith the same combimat reinforcement showed very similar

    static characteristics. Ultimate strength and strain have similar values withinthe experimental scatter (Table 3.3), there fore, only the stress-strain curve of

    the combi NPG /iso lam inate is shown in

    Fig.

    3.3. The main difference between

    the five combi laminates is the onset of non-linearity. Although the exact

    position of the onset is difficult to determine, a trend between the different

    resins can be seen. The iso- and ortho-resins have a lower linear limit than the

    vinylesters and the NPG/iso polyester. This reflects the relativeflexibilityof

    the various resins (Table 3.2). Compressive tests show a fairly linear stress-

    strain curve up to the point of failure. Com pressive properties are also listed in

    Table 3.3.

    Different reinforcements with the same resin have a large influence on the

    static stress-strain behaviour (Fig. 3.3). As expected, modulus and strength

    increase with the amount of fibres in the load direction (Table 3.1). How ever,

    the combimat and the CSM fail already at a strain of about 1.5 percent. All

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    57/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    58/272

    38

    Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    600

    500

    400

    300

    Vi

    200

    SB-combi

    2.5

    3.0

    .0 1.5 2.0

    Strain (%)

    Fig. 3.3 Typical static tensile stress- strain curv es for laminates with NPG /iso-polyester resin

    continually and parallel in one direction (100 percent unidirectional plies).

    These properties cannot be derived from complicated laminates, but the simple

    multiaxial laminates tested here (M A-0, M A-90, and MA -45 ) can be used to

    deduce such ply properties (10)(11).

    Ply

    properties for the multiaxial laminates

    are listed in Table 3.4. Note that the axial properties (parallel and normal to

    fibres) of a 100 percent unidirectional ply are slightly different from the

    properties of the laminates M A-0 and MA-90 (Table 3.3). The ply properties

    can be used to predict properties of more complicated laminates. Predictions

    for the M A-0/90 laminate were found to be verygood.Predictions for (0/90/45)

    laminates were good in the linear range. U ltimate properties can be predicted

    with progressive failure analysis, 'last ply failure' calculations determine the

    first fibre failure (11)(12). In all these cases the ply properties have to be

    adjusted to the fibre volume fractions of the laminates, using micromechanic

    correction formulae (12).

    3.4 Fatigue properties

    Fatigue tests of

    all

    specimens were performed under reverse loading

    7?

    =

    1),

    because it was found to cause the most severe fatigue conditions in other

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    59/272

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    60/272

    40 Design of Com posite Structures Against Fatigue

    showed the highest fatigue strength. The S-N curves for the combimat

    laminates with different resins were very similar to the one for NPG/iso (14).

    Such curves do not reveal any information about the damage processes taking

    place in the specimens. However, damage development studies can help to

    assess the change of properties during the fatigue life, and they can lead to a

    more simplified analysis of ultimate fatigue failure.

    Damage development

    Stresses and strains were monitored continuously for all specimens during

    fatigue testing. A change in the stress-strain curve results from some damage

    development. A reduction of the slope of the curve corresponds to a drop in

    Young's modulus. Initially, such a drop corresponds to the onset and increase

    of matrix cracking in the lam inate. La ter, o ther damage forms, like delamina-

    tion and fibre failure, can contribute to a m odulus drop too (14) (15).

    Reverse loading fatigue shows more special characteristics in the change of

    the stress-strain curve with cycle num ber. T he slope of the tensile part of the

    curve drops to lower values due to an increase in damage (matrix cracking).

    But the compressive slope of the curve remains at the same value through most

    of the fatigue life (Fig. 3.5). Compression seems to close the cracks in the

    material. This means that the damage introduced to the specimen during the

    tensile part of the fatigue cycle does not influence the com pressive modulus of

    the material. Once these cracks are closed under compression, the material

    appears undamaged to a stress-strain measurement. Only shortly before

    failure of the specimen do both the tensile and compressive modulus drop

    rapidly. Itisvery likely that a t this point severe damage, including fibre failure,

    develops in the specimen, which causes rapid degradation of the properties.

    Stress-strain characteristics during fatigue, including hysteresis effects, are

    described in more detail in (14) (15).

    Change of the tensile fatigue modulus is a good way to characterize damage

    development during fatigue. Figure 3.6 shows the change of the modulus with

    cycle number for different fatigue strains for the combi-NPG/iso laminate.

    Cycling belowthelinear limit

    Specimens have the same initial tensile fatigue modulus E

    tfi

    as the primary

    static modulus E

    t

    . The tensile fatigue modulus E

    l{

    remains constant for a

    number of cycles before it starts to drop. This indicates that the specimen is

    initially free of damage, i.e., no matrix cracking. Cracking sets in after an

    initiation period, when the modulus starts to drop. The initiation period

    increases if a specimen is cycled at very low amplitudes, i.e., far below the

    linear limit.

    Figure 3.6

    shows two

    specimens which were cycled at strains below the linear

    limit. The modulus E

    t{

    of the specimen cycled at 0.32 percent strain drops after

    about 1500 cycles, while the modulus of the specimen cycled at 0.25 percent

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    61/272

    Strain

    Fig. 3.5 Schematic of stress-strain curves of a fatigue test

    strain drops after approximately 3000 cycles. This onset of matrix cracking

    happens at much lower numbers of cycles than ultimate failure (Fig. 3.7).

    Cycling abovethelinear limit

    Specimens develop matrix cracking already when loaded in thefirstcycle. The

    initial modulus E

    t

    depends on the fatigue strain (Fig. 3.6). High strain levels

    cause much initial damage, giving low initial fatigue moduli

    t fi

    . The moduli

    drop imm ediately with increasing cycle num ber, reflecting an instant growth of

    damage.

    Critical fatigue modulusE

    cr

    Once matrix cracking occurs, the crack density increases, causing the tensile

    modulus to drop. The modulus E

    lf

    drops slowly and fairly linearly with the

    logarithm of the cycle number up to a critical value

    cr i t

    (Fig. 3.6). This

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    62/272

    42

    Design of Com posite Structures Against Fatigue

    1.1

    l .o

    s

    I 0.9

    y

    s

    3

    0.8

    I 0.7

    0.6

    0.5

    ' S

    1 . 6 1 ^ ' ^

    . 2 5

    ^ , 0 . 3 2

    - ^ ^ 5 9 '

    i

    10.96

    i

    :

    0.59

    No

    damage

    Slight -

    damage

    >

    : Severe

    damage

    :

    1

    10'

    to

    2

    i o

    3

    io

    4

    10

    5

    Cycles to failure

    10' 10'

    Fig . 3 .6 Ch ang e of tens i l e fa t igue mo du lus

    E

    r

    wi th cycle number for various ini t ia l s tra ins (%) of

    the co m bi m a t N P G / i s o -po l y es t er l a m i na te ( l o a ded i n w e f t d i rec t i o n) . Th e upper tw o

    curves show data for specimens cycled below the l inear l imi t

    modulus appears to be independent of the strain amplitude. Since a linear

    relationship between modulus drop and matrix crack density was found in

    other composites (3), matrix crack density seems to accumulate linearly with

    the logarithm of the cycle number.

    Slightly different behaviour was observed for specimens cycled below the

    linear limit (0.35 percent). After the linear drop of stiffness E

    tf

    with cycle

    number the reduction slowed down and eventually halted, indicating a satu

    ration of the damage. The modulus E

    f

    at saturation was slightly above the

    critical modulus

    cr i t

    . Damage saturation was also found in crossplied (0/90

    3

    )s

    GRP (3) (16). This means that all matrix cracks had been formed, but the

    laminate was able to sustain the damage.

    E

    crit

    reflects the stiffness of the laminate at a state of dam age, whichismostly

    due to m atrix cracking. A t this level, thefibresseem to be still undamaged and

    so able to sustain the applied load.

    Failure

    Once the modulus drops belowE

    crit

    all properties ofthelaminate degrade very

    rapidly. A rapid drop in tensile stiffness coincides with a rapid drop of

    compressive stiffness E

    c{

    ,which stays constant at the previous static valueE

    c

    (14).

    A different damage mechanism, probably damage of the load bearing

    fibres, gets activated and rapidly

    causes

    ultimate failure. A further indication of

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Composite Structures Against Fatigue

    63/272

    Influence of M atrix and Fabric

    43

    2.0

    1.8

    1.6

    1-4

    h 1.2

    A

    I 1.0

    3

    I 0.8

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0

    iso / combi

    NPG iso

    vinyl

    rub-v inyl

    ortho

    NPG iso / SB combi

    95/95

    limit

    So me

    da ma g e

    No

    m l

    O.Q.

    J L

    S. .

    N.

    1

    10 IO

    2

    IO

    3

    IO

    Cycles

    10

    s

    IO

    6

    IO

    7

    Fig . 3 .7 /V cur ves for com bi lamin ates wi th variou s res ins and one SB-c om bi re info rcem ent . T he

    stages of da m age in the Com bi-N PG/ iso -poly es ter laminat es are indic ated . Ini t ia l s tra in i s

    p l o t t ed beca us e t e s t s were per fo rmed under l o a d co ntro l , whi ch mea ns s t ra i ns i ncrea s e

    s l ight ly during fat igue

    severe damage formation is the sudden appearance of and increase in the

    hysteresis effect in the fatigue stress-strain curve (between loading and

    unloading curve) when the fatigue modulus drops below