Design Heat Exchanger

download Design Heat Exchanger

of 86

Transcript of Design Heat Exchanger

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    1/86

    Heat Exchanger DesignAnand V P Gurumoorthy

    Associate Professor

    Chemical Engineering Division

    School of Mechanical & Building Sciences

    VIT University

    [EDITED BY AFRAZ ]

    ICET PU[UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB LAHORE]

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    2/86

    Heat Exchanger Classification

    Recuperative:Cold and hot fluid flow through the unit without mixing

    with each other. The transfer of heat occurs through themetal wall.

    Regenerative:Same heating surface is alternately exposed to hot and

    cold fluid. Heat from hot fluid is stored by packings orsolids; this heat is passed over to the cold fluid.

    Direct contact:Hot and cold fluids are in direct contact and mixing occurs

    among them; mass transfer and heat transfer occursimultaneously.

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    3/86

    Heat Exchanger Standards andCodes

    British Standard BS-3274

    TEMA standards are universally used.

    TEMA standards cover following classes ofexchangers:Class Rdesignates severe requirements of petroleum

    and other related processing applications

    Class Cmoderate requirements of commercial and

    general process applicationsClass Bspecifies design and fabrication for chemical

    process service.

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    4/86

    Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

    Most commonly used type of heat transferequipment in the chemical and allied industries.

    Advantages:

    The configuration gives a large surface area in a smallvolume.

    Good mechanical layout: a good shape for pressureoperation.

    Uses well-established fabrication techniques.

    Can be constructed from a wide range of materials.

    Easily cleaned.

    Well established design procedures.

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    5/86

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    6/86

    Types of Shell and Tube HeatExchangers

    Fixed tube designSimplest and cheapest type.

    Tube bundle cannot be removed for cleaning.

    No provision for differential expansion of shell and tubes.

    Use of this type limited to temperature difference upto800C.

    Floating head design

    More versatile than fixed head exchangers.

    Suitable for higher temperature differentials.

    Bundles can be removed and cleaned (fouling liquids)

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    7/86

    Design of Shell and Tube HeatExchangers

    Kern method:Does not take into account bypass and leakage streams.Simple to apply and accurate enough for preliminary design

    calculations.Restricted to a fixed baffle cut (25%).

    Bell-Delaware methodMost widely used.Takes into account:

    Leakage through the gaps between tubes and baffles and the baffles andshell.

    Bypassing of flow around the gap between tube bundle and shell.

    Stream Analysis method (by Tinker)More rigorous and generic.Best suited for computer calculations; basis for most commercial

    computer codes.

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    8/86

    Construction DetailsTubeDimensions

    Tube diameters in the range 5/8 inch (16 mm) to 2inch (50 mm).

    Smaller diameters (5/8 to 1 inch) preferred since

    this gives compact and cheap heat exchangers. Larger tubes for heavily fouling fluids.

    Steel tubesBS 3606; Other tubesBS 3274.

    Preferred tube lengths are 6 ft, 8 ft, 12 ft, 16 ft, 20

    ft and 24 ft; optimum tube length to shell diameterratio ~ 510.

    in (19 mm) is a good starting trial tube diameter.

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    9/86

    Construction DetailsTubeArrangements

    Tubes usually arranged in equilateral triangular, square or rotatedsquare patterns.

    Tube pitch, Pt, is 1.25 times OD.

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    10/86

    Construction Details - Shells

    Shell should be a close fit to the tube bundle to reduce bypassing.

    Shell-bundle clearance will depend on type of heat exchanger.

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    11/86

    Construction Details - Shell-Bundle Clearance

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    12/86

    Construction DetailsTubeCount Bundle diameter depends not only on number of tubes but also number of

    tube passes.

    Ntis the number of tubes

    Dbis the bundle diameter (mm)

    D0is tube outside diameter (mm)

    n1and K1 are constants

    1/1

    1

    0

    n

    t

    b

    K

    NdD

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    13/86

    Construction Details - Baffles

    Bafflesare used:To direct the fluid stream across the tubes

    To increase the fluid velocity

    To improve the rate of transfer

    Most commonly used baffle is the single segmental baffle.

    Optimal baffle cut ~ 20-25%

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    14/86

    Basic Design Procedure

    General equation for heat transfer is:

    where Q is the rate of heat transfer (duty),

    U is the overall heat transfer coefficient,

    A is the area for heat transfer

    Tmis the mean temperature difference

    We are not doing a mechanical design, only athermal design.

    mTUAQ

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    15/86

    Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient

    Overall coefficient given by:

    h0 (hi) is outside (inside) film coefficient

    hod(hid) is outside (inside) dirt coefficient

    kwis the tube wall conductivitydo(di) is outside (inside) tube diameters

    iiidiw

    i

    od hd

    d

    hd

    d

    k

    d

    dd

    hhU

    11

    2

    ln111 00

    00

    00

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    16/86

    Individual Film Coefficients

    Magnitude of individual coefficients will depend on:Nature of transfer processes (conduction, convection,

    radiation, etc.)

    Physical properties of fluids

    Fluid flow rates

    Physical layout of heat transfer surface

    Physical layout cannot be determined until area is

    known; hence design is a trial-and-error procedure.

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    17/86

    Typical Overall Coefficients

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    18/86

    Typical Overall Coefficients

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    19/86

    Fouling Factors (Dirt Coeffs)

    Difficult to predict and usually based on past experience

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    20/86

    Mean Temperature Difference(Temperature Driving Force)

    To determine A, Tmmust be estimated

    True counter-current flowlogarithmic temperature difference(LMTD)

    mTUAQ

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    21/86

    LMTD

    LMTD is given by:

    where T1is the hot fluid temperature, inlet

    T2is the hot fluid temperature, outlet

    t1is the cold fluid temperature, inlett2is the cold fluid temperature, outlet

    12

    21

    1221

    ln

    )()(

    tTtT

    tTtTTlm

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    22/86

    Counter-current FlowTemperature Proflies

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    23/86

    1:2 Heat ExchangerTemperature Profiles

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    24/86

    True Temperature Difference

    Obtained from LMTD using a correction factor:

    Tmis the true temperature difference

    Ftis the correction factor

    Ftis related to two dimensionless ratios:

    lmtm

    TFT

    )(

    )(

    12

    21

    tt

    TTR

    )(

    )(

    11

    12

    tT

    ttS

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    25/86

    Temp Correction Factor Ft

    Temperature correction factor, one shell pass, two or more even tube passes

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    26/86

    Fluid Allocation: Shell or Tubes?

    Corrosion

    Fouling

    Fluid temperatures

    Operating pressures Pressure drop

    Viscosity

    Stream flow rates

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    27/86

    Shell and Tube Fluid Velocities

    High velocities give high heat-transfer coefficientsbut also high pressure drop.

    Velocity must be high enough to prevent settling of

    solids, but not so high as to cause erosion. High velocities will reduce fouling

    For liquids, the velocities should be as follows:Tube side: Process liquid 1-2m/s

    Maximum 4m/s if required to reduce fouling

    Water 1.52.5 m/s

    Shell side: 0.31 m/s

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    28/86

    Pressure Drop

    As the process fluids move through the heat exchanger there isassociated pressure drop.

    For liquids: viscosity < 1mNs/m235kN/m2

    Viscosity 110 mNs/m250-70kN/m2

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    29/86

    Tube-side Heat TransferCoefficient For turbulent flow inside conduits of uniform cross-section, Sieder-Tateequation is applicable:

    C=0.021 for gases

    =0.023 for low viscosity liquids

    =0.027 for viscous liquids

    = fluid viscosity at bulk fluid temperature

    w=fluid viscosity at the wall

    14.0

    33.08.0PrRe

    w

    CNu

    f

    ei

    kdh

    Nu

    etduRef

    p

    k

    C Pr

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    30/86

    Tube-side Heat TransferCoefficient

    Butterworth equation:

    For laminar flow (Re

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    31/86

    Heat Transfer Factor, jh

    j factor similar to friction factor used for pressuredrop:

    This equation is valid for both laminar and turbulentflows.

    14.0

    33.0PrRe

    w

    h

    f

    ii jk

    dh

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    32/86

    Tube Side Heat Transfer Factor

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    33/86

    Heat Transfer Coefficients forWater

    Many equations for hihave developed specificallyfor water. One such equation is:

    where hiis the inside coefficient (W/m2 0C)

    t is the water temperature (0C)utis water velocity (m/s)

    dt is tube inside diameter (mm)

    2.0

    8.0

    )02.035.1(4200

    i

    ti

    duth

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    34/86

    Tube-side Pressure Drop

    where P is tube-side pressure drop (N/m2)

    Npis number of tube-side passes

    utis tube-side velocity (m/s)

    Lis the length of one tube

    mis 0.25 for laminar and 0.14 for turbulentjfis dimensionless friction factor for heat

    exchanger tubes

    25.28

    2

    t

    m

    wi

    fpt

    u

    d

    LjNP

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    35/86

    Tube Side Friction Factor

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    36/86

    Shell-side Heat Transfer andPressure Drop

    Kerns method

    Bells method

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    37/86

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    38/86

    Procedure for Kerns Method

    Calculate area for cross-flow Asfor the hypothetical row oftubes in the shell equator.

    ptis the tube pitchd0is the tube outside diameter

    Dsis the shell inside diameter

    lBis the baffle spacing, m.

    Calculate shell-side mass velocity Gsand linear velocity, u

    s.

    where Wsis the fluid mass flow rate in the shell in kg/s

    t

    bsts

    p

    DdpA

    )(0

    s

    ss

    A

    WG

    ss

    Gu

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    39/86

    Procedure for Kerns Method

    Calculate the shell side equivalent diameter (hydraulic diameter). For a square pitch arrangement:

    For a triangular pitch arrangement

    0

    2

    0

    2

    44

    d

    dp

    d

    t

    e

    2

    42

    187.0

    24

    0

    2

    0

    d

    dp

    p

    d

    tt

    e

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    40/86

    Shell-side Reynolds Number

    The shell-side Reynolds number is given by:

    The coefficient hsis given by:

    wherejhis given by the following chart

    eses dudG Re

    14.0

    3/1PrRe

    w

    h

    f

    es jk

    dhNu

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    41/86

    Shell Side Heat Transfer Factor

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    42/86

    Shell-side Pressure Drop

    The shell-side pressure drop is given by:

    where jfis the friction factor given by following chart.

    14.02

    28

    w

    s

    Be

    s

    fs

    uL

    d

    DjP

    Shell Side Friction Factor

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    43/86

    Shell Side Friction Factor

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    44/86

    )(

    )(

    12

    21

    tt

    TTR

    )(

    )(

    11

    12

    tT

    ttS

    (Figure 8 in notes)

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    45/86

    mTUAQ

    1/1

    1

    0

    n

    tb

    K

    NdD

    (Figure 4 in notes)

    (Figure 2)

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    46/86

    2.0

    8.0)02.035.1(4200

    i

    ti

    d

    uth

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    47/86

    (Figure 9 in notes)

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    48/86

    t

    bst

    s p

    Ddp

    A

    )( 0

    2

    42

    187.0

    24

    0

    2

    0

    d

    dp

    p

    d

    tt

    e

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    49/86

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    50/86

    iiidiw

    i

    od hd

    d

    hd

    d

    k

    d

    dd

    hhU

    11

    2

    ln111 00

    0

    0

    00

    (Figure 10 in notes)

    (Table 3 in notes)

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    51/86

    25.28

    2

    t

    m

    wi

    fpt

    u

    d

    LjNP

    14.02

    28

    w

    s

    Be

    sfs

    uL

    d

    DjP

    (Figure 12 in notes)

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    52/86

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    53/86

    Bells Method

    In Bells method, the heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop areestimated from correlations for flow over ideal tube banks.

    The effects of leakage, by-passing, and flow in the window zone areallowed for by applying correction factors.

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    54/86

    Bells Method Shell-side HeatTransfer Coefficient

    where hocis heat transfer coeff for cross flow

    over ideal tube banks

    Fnis correction factor to allow for no.of vertical tube rows

    Fwis window effect correction factorFbis bypass stream correction factor

    FLis leakage correction factor

    Lbwnocs FFFFhh

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    55/86

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    56/86

    Bells Method Ideal Cross Flow

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    57/86

    Bell s Method Ideal Cross FlowCoefficient

    The Re for cross-flow through the tube bank is given by:

    Gsis the mass flow rate per unit area

    d0is tube OD

    Heat transfer coefficient is given by:

    00Re dudG

    ss

    14.0

    3/10 PrRe

    w

    h

    f

    oc jk

    dh

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    58/86

    Bells Method Tube RowCorrection Factor

    For Re>2100, Fnis obtained as a function of Ncv(no. of tubes betweenbaffle tips) from the chart below:

    For Re 100

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    59/86

    Bells Method WindowCorrection Factor

    Fw, the window correction factor is obtained from thefollowing chart:

    whereRwis the ratio of bundle cross-sectional area in thewindow zone to the tube bundle cross-sectional area(obtained from simple formulae).

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    60/86

    Bells Method BypassCorrection Factor

    Clearance area[Ab]between the bundle and the shell

    For the case of no sealing strips, Fbas a function of A

    b/A

    scan be

    obtained from the following chart

    )( bsBb DDA

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    61/86

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    62/86

    Bells Method BypassCorrection Factor

    For sealing strips, for Ns

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    63/86

    Bells Method LeakageCorrection Factor Tube-baffle clearance area Atbis given by:

    Shell-baffle clearance area Asb

    is given by:

    where Csis baffle to shell clearance and bis the angle subtended by baffle chord

    AL=Atb+Asb

    where Lis a factor obtained from following chart

    )(2

    8.0 0wttb NN

    dA

    )2(2

    bss

    sb

    DCA

    L

    sbtbLL

    A

    AAF )2(1

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    64/86

    Coefficient for FL, Heat Transfer

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    65/86

    Shell-side Pressure Drop

    Involves three components:

    Pressure drop in cross-flow zone

    Pressure drop in window zone

    Pressure drop in end zone

    C

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    66/86

    Pressure Drop in Cross FlowZone

    where Pipressure drop calculated for an equivalent ideal tubebank

    Fb is bypass correction factor

    FL is leakage correction factor

    wherejfis given by the following chart

    Ncvis number of tube rows crossed

    usis shell-side velocity

    ''

    Lbic FFPP

    14.02

    28

    w

    scvfi

    uNjP

    F i ti F t f C Fl

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    67/86

    Friction Factor for Cross FlowBanks

    Bells Method Bypass

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    68/86

    Bell s Method BypassCorrection Factor for Pressure

    Drop

    is 5.0 for laminar flow, Re100

    Abis the clearance area between the bundle and shell

    Nsis the number of sealing strips encountered by bypass

    streamNcvis the number of tube rows encountered in the cross- flow section

    3/1

    ' 21exp

    cv

    s

    s

    bb

    N

    N

    A

    AF

    B ll M th d L k F t

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    69/86

    Bells Method Leakage Factorfor Pressure Drop

    where Atbis the tube to baffle clearance area

    Asbis the shell to baffle clearance area

    ALis total leakage area = Atb+Asb

    L is factor obtained from following chart

    L

    sbtbLL

    A

    AAF

    )2(1

    ''

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    70/86

    Coefficient for FL

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    71/86

    Pressure Drop in Window Zones

    whereusis the geometric mean velocity

    uwis the velocity in the window zone

    Wsis the shell-side fluid mass flow

    Nwvis number of restrictions for cross-flow in windowzone, approximately equal to the number of tube rows.

    2)6.00.2(

    2

    ' z

    wvLw

    u

    NFP

    swz

    uuu

    w

    swA

    Wu

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    72/86

    Pressure Drop in End Zones

    Ncv

    is the number of tube rows encountered in the cross-flow section

    Nwvis number of restrictions for cross-flow in window zone,approximately equal to the number of tube rows.

    ')(b

    cv

    cvwvie F

    N

    NNPP

    B ll M th d T t l Sh ll id

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    73/86

    Bells Method Total Shell-sidePressure Drop

    zoneswindowN

    zonescrossflowNzonesendP

    b

    bs

    )1(2

    wbcbes PNPNPP )1(2

    Eff t f F li

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    74/86

    Effect of Fouling

    Above calculation assumes clean tubes

    Effect of fouling on pressure drop is given by table above

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    75/86

    Condensers

    Construction of a condenser is similar to other shell and tubeheat exchangers, but with a wider baffle spacing

    Four condenser configurations:Horizontal, with condensation in the shell

    Horizontal, with condensation in the tubes

    Vertical, with condensation in the shell

    Vertical, with condensation in the tubes

    Horizontal shell-side and vertical tube-side are the mostcommonly used types of condenser.

    sB Dl

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    76/86

    Heat Transfer Mechanisms

    Filmwise condensationNormal mechanism for heat transfer in commercial condensers

    Dropwise condensationWill give higher heat transfer coefficients but is unpredictableNot yet considered a practical proposition for the design of

    condensers In the Nusselt model of condensation laminar flow is

    assumed in the film, and heat transfer is assumed to takeplace entirely by conduction through the film.

    Nusselt model strictly applied only at low liquid and vaporrates when the film is undisturbed.

    At higher rates, turbulence is induced in the liquid filmincreasing the rate of heat transfer over that predicted byNusselt model.

    Condensation Outside Horizontal

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    77/86

    Condensation Outside HorizontalTubes

    where (hc)1is the mean condensation film coefficient, for a single tubekLis the condensate thermal conductivity

    Lis the condensate density

    vis the vapour density

    Lis the condensate viscosity

    g is the gravitational acceleration

    is the tube loading, the condensate flow per unit length of tube.

    If there are Nrtubes in a vertical row and the condensate is assumed to flowsmoothly from row to row, and if the flow is laminar, the top tube film coefficientis given by:

    3/1

    1)(95.0)(

    L

    vLLLc

    gkh

    4/1

    1)()( rcNc Nhh r

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    78/86

    Condensation Outside Horizontal

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    79/86

    Condensation Outside HorizontalTubes

    In practice, condensate will not flow smoothly from tube totube.

    Kerns estimate of mean coefficient for a tube bundle isgiven by:

    Lis the tube length

    Wcis the total condensate flow

    Ntis the total number of tubes in the bundle

    Nris the average number of tubes in a vertical tube row For low-viscosity condensates the correction for the number

    of tube rows is generally ignored.

    6/1

    3/1

    )(95.0)(

    rhL

    vLLLbc Ng

    kh

    t

    ch

    LNW

    Condensation Inside and Outside

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    80/86

    Condensation Inside and OutsideVertical Tubes

    For condensation inside and outside vertical tubes the Nusseltmodelgives:

    where (hc)vis the mean condensation coefficient

    vis the vertical tube loading, condensate per unit tube perimeter

    Above equation applicable for Re2000, turbulent flow; situation analyzed by Colburn andresults in following chart.

    3/1

    )(926.0)(

    vL

    vLLLvc

    gkh

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    81/86

    Colburns Results

    Boyko-Kruzhilin Correlation

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    82/86

    Boyko-Kruzhilin Correlation A correlation for shear-controlled condensation in tubes; simple to use.

    The correlation gives mean coefficient between two points at which vapor quality, x, (mass fraction ofvapour) is known.

    1,2 refer to inlet and outlet conditions respectively

    In a condenser, the inlet stream will normally be saturated vapour and vapour will be totallycondensed. For these conditions:

    For design of condensers with condensation inside the tubes and downward vapor flow, coefficientshould be evaluated using Colburns method and Boyko-Kruzhilin correlation and the highervalueselected.

    xJwhereJJ

    hhv

    vLiBKc

    1

    2)(

    2/12

    2/11

    43.08.0

    PrRe021.0

    i

    L

    id

    k

    h

    2

    1

    )( v

    L

    iBKc hh

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    83/86

    Flooding in Vertical Tubes

    When the vapor flows up the tube, tubes should notflood.

    Flooding should not occur if the following condition is

    satisfied:

    where uvand uLare velocities of vapor and liquid anddiis in metres.

    The critical condition will occur at the bottom of thetube, so vapor and liquid velocities should beevaluated at this point.

    4/14/12/14/12/1 )(6.0 vLiLLvv gduu

    Condensation Inside Horizontal

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    84/86

    Condensation Inside HorizontalTubes When condensation occurs, the heat transfer coefficient at any point along the

    tube will depend on the flow pattern at that point.

    No general satisfactory method exists that will give accurate predictions over awide flow range.

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    85/86

    Two Flow Models Two flow models:

    Stratified flow

    Limiting condition at low condensate and vapor rates

    Annular flow

    Limiting condition at high vapor and low condensate rates

    For stratified flow, the condensate film coefficient can be estimated as:

    For annular flow, the Boyko-Kruzhilin equation can be used

    For condenser design, both annular and stratified flow should be considered andthe higher value of mean coefficient should be selected.

    3/1

    )(76.0)(

    hL

    vLLLsc

    gkh

    Condensation of steam

  • 7/27/2019 Design Heat Exchanger

    86/86

    For air-free steam a coefficient of 8000 W/m2-0C should be used.

    Mean Temperature DifferenceA pure, saturated, vapor will condense at a constant temperature, at

    constant pressure.

    For an isothermal process such as this, the LMTD is given by:

    where Tsatis saturation temperature of vapor

    t1(t2) is the inlet (outlet) coolant temperature

    No correction factor for multiple passes is needed.

    2

    1

    12

    ln

    )(

    tT

    tT

    tt

    lm

    sat

    sat

    T