Design Calculations

31
DESIGN OF WATER PIPELINE CROSSING ETIHAD RAIL Project Location: Date: 22-11-2014 Client: Etihad Rail Contractor: Al Salmeen General Contracting LLC Scope: This design report comprises the design of water pipeline crossing the proposed Railway Track at west Samha. The pipeline is designed as per the guideline provided by the Client. (Appendix C). The crossing arrangement must be so designed to withstand the load imposed by the rolling stock. Design Criteria: The Design Calculations have been based on AWWA (American Water Works Association) Standards. General: The basis of design is to encase the ϕ600 carrier pipe in 1000ϕ GRC casing pipe, to be enclosed in Reinforced concrete to withstand the dead and live loads imposed by the train operation. The space between carrier pipe and casing pipe will be pressure grouted later on in order to provide it stability. The minimum depth of the

description

Design of underground Pipes

Transcript of Design Calculations

Page 1: Design Calculations

DESIGN OF WATER PIPELINE CROSSING ETIHAD RAIL

Project Location:

Date: 22-11-2014

Client: Etihad Rail

Contractor: Al Salmeen General Contracting LLC

Scope:

This design report comprises the design of water pipeline crossing the proposed Railway Track at west Samha. The pipeline is designed as per the guideline provided by the Client. (Appendix C). The crossing arrangement must be so designed to withstand the load imposed by the rolling stock.

Design Criteria:

The Design Calculations have been based on AWWA (American Water Works Association) Standards.

General:

The basis of design is to encase the ϕ600 carrier pipe in 1000ϕ GRC casing pipe, to be enclosed in Reinforced concrete to withstand the dead and live loads imposed by the train operation. The space between carrier pipe and casing pipe will be pressure grouted later on in order to provide it stability. The minimum depth of the

Page 2: Design Calculations

pressure grouted later on in order to provide it stability. The minimum depth of the RCC protection system is kept 2.3 m from the reduced ground level, as our crossing is lying in the area where the existing ground level is above the proposed cut level of the railroad.

2. Loading

2.1 Material densities

The following material densities are used to calculate the dead load of the members.

Reinforced Concrete = 2400 kg/m3

Rail = 70 kg/lm

Concrete Sleepers ( 2 m long) = 335 kg

Ballast = 1200 kg/m3

Backfill material = 19 kN/m3

Page 3: Design Calculations

2.2 Live Load

The crossing is designed to withstand the axle load of Cooper E80 loading. The details or this loading are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Page 4: Design Calculations

Design consideration in GRP Casing Pipe

Allowable defelection from ring beding

Mean Pipe Diameter ≔D 1000 mm

Shape Factor ≔Df 4.5 ≔E 17 GPa

structural wall thikness ≔t 14.2 mm

thickness of liner ≔tL 1 mm

total thickness =≔tt +t tL 15.2 mm

Long term Ring bending strain, mm/mm ≔Sb %1.3

Fig 1

Design Factor ≔FS 1.5

Maximum ring bending strain due to deflection =≔εb ――Sb

FS0.009 ⋅――

1

mmmm

Maximum allowable vertical pipe deflection =≔∆ya ⋅⋅―εb

Df

D ―D

tt126.706 mm

Calculation of prediced vertical pipe declection , ∆y

Deflection Log Factor ≔DL 1.5

Soil Unit Weight ≔γ 19 ――kN

m3

Page 5: Design Calculations

Overburden Depth ≔H 3.05 m

Dead Load =≔WC ⋅γ H 57.95 kPa

Wheel Load Cooper E 80 ≔P 39 kPa Table 5-2

Impact factor =≔If +1 ⋅0.33⎛⎜⎝―――――(( −2.44 m H))

2.44 m

⎞⎟⎠

0.918

≔If 1

Multiple presence Factor ≔Mp 4

Live Load =≔WL ⋅⋅P If Mp 156 kPa

Bedding Coefficient ≔Kx 0.083

Pipe Stiffness ≔PS 5 kPa

Constrained soil modulus of the native soil at pipe elevation

≔Msn 10.3 MPa

≔Bd 1.25 m

Constrained soil modulus of the pipe zone embedment

≔Msb 29 MPa

'

=――Msn

Msb

0.355

≔Sc 0.45

=≔Ms ⋅Sc Msb 13.05 MPa

Predicted vertical pipe deflection

=≔∆y ⋅⋅⋅⎛⎝ +⋅DL WC WL⎞⎠ Kx ―――――――

D

⎛⎝ +⋅149 PS ⋅61000 Ms⎞⎠

103 0.025 mm

=――∆y

D⋅2.533 10−5 =――

∆ya

D0.127

∆y ∆y

Page 6: Design Calculations

=<――∆y

D――∆ya

D1 Ok

Combined Loading

The check for pipe pressure and deflection combined is as follows

Working pressure ≔Pw 1600 kPa

Hydraulic Design Basis =≔HDB ――Pw

FS1066.667 kPa

Working Strain =≔εpr ⋅Pw ―――D

(( ⋅⋅2 t E))0.003 ――

mm

mm

Page 7: Design Calculations

Rerounding coefficient =≔rc −1 ――――Pw

3000 kPa0.467

=⋅εb ―rc

Sb0.311 =――――――

⎛⎜⎝−1⎛⎜⎝――――

⋅εpr 1 kPa

HDB

⎞⎟⎠

⎞⎟⎠

FS0.667

=<⋅εb ―rc

Sb――――――

⎛⎜⎝−1⎛⎜⎝――――

⋅εpr 1 kPa

HDB

⎞⎟⎠

⎞⎟⎠

FS1 OK

Buckling check

Design factor ≔FSb 2.5

Scalar calibration factor to account for some nonlinear effects

≔Cn 0.55

Factor to account for variability in stiffness of compacted soil

≔ϕs 0.9

Poisson’s ratio for soil ≔v 0.3

Modulus correction factor for Poisson’s ratio, v, of the soil

=≔kv ⋅(( +1 v)) ―――(( −1 ⋅2 v))(( −1 v))

0.743

Correction factor for depth of fill

=≔Rh ―――――11.4

⎛⎜⎝

+11 ―――D

1000 H

⎞⎟⎠

1.036

Allowable buckling pressure

=≔qa ⋅⎛⎜⎝――1

FSb

⎞⎟⎠

⎛⎝ ⋅1.2 Cn

(( ⋅0.149 PS)).33⎞⎠ ⎛⎝ ⋅⋅⋅ϕs 106 Ms kv

⎞⎠.67

――Rh

10001135.593 kPa

Specific weight of water ≔γw 9800 ――N

m3

height of water table ≔hw 1.5 m

Water buoyancy factor =≔Rw −1 0.33⎛⎜⎝―hw

H

⎞⎟⎠

0.838

Page 8: Design Calculations

=⎛⎝ ++⋅γw hw ⋅Rw WC WL⎞⎠ 219.245 kPa

=<⎛⎝ ++⋅γw hw ⋅Rw WC WL⎞⎠ qa 1 Safe against buckling

Page 9: Design Calculations
Page 10: Design Calculations
Page 11: Design Calculations
Page 12: Design Calculations
Page 13: Design Calculations
Page 14: Design Calculations
Page 15: Design Calculations
Page 16: Design Calculations
Page 17: Design Calculations
Page 18: Design Calculations
Page 19: Design Calculations
Page 20: Design Calculations
Page 21: Design Calculations
Page 22: Design Calculations
Page 23: Design Calculations
Page 24: Design Calculations
Page 25: Design Calculations
Page 26: Design Calculations
Page 27: Design Calculations
Page 28: Design Calculations
Page 29: Design Calculations
Page 30: Design Calculations
Page 31: Design Calculations