DESIGN -BUILD FOR AIRFIELD PROJECTS...DESIGN -BUILD FOR AIRFIELD PROJECTS: Origins, Requirements,...
47
MILITARY DESIGN GROUP Delta Airport Consultants, Inc BURGESS ENGINEERING Airfield Lighting & NavAid Design DESIGN-BUILD FOR AIRFIELD PROJECTS: Origins, Requirements, and Results 9 July 2015
Transcript of DESIGN -BUILD FOR AIRFIELD PROJECTS...DESIGN -BUILD FOR AIRFIELD PROJECTS: Origins, Requirements,...
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
DESIGN-BUILD FOR AIRFIELD PROJECTS:
Origins, Requirements, and Results
9 July 2015
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Matthew W. Kundrot , P .E . Director – Mil itary Design Group, Delta Airport Consultants
Program Expertise (30 years) Mission Operations Coordination (USAF, retired, 4,000 Hour Pi lot) Project Design and Construction Phasing
Education B.S. Civi l Engineering – Penn State M.S. Aviation Management – Embry Riddle
David A. Burgess , P .E . , L t . Col . ( re t ) Electrical & NavAid Design, Burgess Engineering
Program Expertise (26 years) Airfield Electrical Design, USAF Civi l Engineer Infrastructure Assessment Education B.S. Electrical Engineering – Virginia Tech M.Eng. Construction Management – University of Maryland
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Mil i tary Ai r f ie ld Project/Design-Bui ld Exper ience
P ro jects : Edwards AFB, CA (DB) Andrews AFB, MD (DB) – 4
NAS Jacksonvi l le, FL Columbus AFB, MS (DB)
NAS Oceana, VA (DB) Dover AFB, DE
NAS Patuxent R iver, MD Kandahar AB, Afghanistan (DB)
NS Guantanamo Bay (DB) Lackland AFB, TX (DB)-2
OLF Whitehouse, FL (DB) Langley AFB, VA
Misawa AB, Japan (DB) Forney AAF, MO (DB)
Moody AFB, GA (DB) Westover ARB, MA (DB)
NAS Corpus Chr i st i NAS Pensacola
NAS Kingsv i l le NAS Mer idian
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Out l ine
1. Origin & Requirements of Airf ield Design-Bui ld Projects
2. Why is Design Sti l l Important
3. Special ized Design and Construction for the Airf ield
Environment
a. Civi l
b. Electr ical
4. The Consequences of Improper Scoping
5. Summary and Recommendations
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Or ig in & Requ i rements o f A i r f ie ld Des ign-Bu i ld P ro jects
1. Better, Faster, Cheaper
2. 2001 – The first “GWOT”
3. Contracting Trends and Challenges – One Contract to
Execute Project
4. Special ized Design Required for the Airf ield Environment
- Averting Hazardous Infrastructure Design: Airf ield
Pavements, Obstructions, Electr ical/Lighting/NAVAIDs
- Phasing Requirements Place Restr ictions on Contractor
Production and Increase Construction but Reduce
Operational Costs
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Specialized Design The airf ield environment has design and construction requirements and constraints which are not readily apparent. Consequence of failure is signif icant and potentially catastrophic
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Ai r f ie ld S ignage and
Marking Related Catastrophe
Tenerife, Canary Islands
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Lost Commercial Aircraft Mishaps
Tenerife, Canary Islands –1977 Madrid – 1983
Detroit, MI – 1990 Taipei (Construction) - 2000
Milan – 2001 Lexington, KY (Construction) – 2006
Johannesburg --2013
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Runway Obstruct ion Related Mishap
F-16 Aborted Takeoff
1998 Misawa Air Base, Japan
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Runway Area Obstacles
Remain
Duke Field, Egl in AFB, FL
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Specialized Airfield Civil Design
- Beyond the Footpr int of the Pavement Box - Imaginary Sur faces are Real
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Design Const raints Imposed by Imaginary Sur faces
-Ai rspace
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Design Const raints Imposed by Imaginary Sur faces
Lateral Clearance Areas
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Design Const raints Imposed by Imaginary Sur faces
Longi tudinal P rof i le and L ine of S ight
Tw
y C
harl
ie
Tw
y Si
erra
Rwy 01L/19R 9300 x 200 Primary Instrument Runway
Rwy 01R/19L 9755 x 150
Twy Whiskey
Twy W-4 Twy W-1
Twy Whiskey
Twy Echo
Twy Echo
Twy E-1 Twy E-2 Twy E-3
Twy E-4
Twy A-2
Tw
y W
-2
Pad 92
Pad 93
Pad 94
Pad 12
Pad 13
Pad 14
NAVAIDs Rd
3 4 5
6-7
8
9
18
10 11
12 13 14
Twy E-5 Twy E-6 Twy E-7
16
AM
Tower
ASR VORTAC
LEGEND
N
19 L
01
R
01
L 19
R
1 2 Note: Reference Only; not to scale.
VFR Hold Line
Instrument Hold Line
Glide Slope Critical Area
Localizer Critical Area
Precision Obstacle Free (POFZ) Zone
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Consequences o f not Unders tanding A i r f ie ld Cons t ruct ion f rom an Operat ions Perspect ive
I raq - 2004
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Ai r f ie ld L ight ing System Components
Runway & Tax iway L ight ing A i r f ie ld Guidance S igns Approach L ight ing Systems A i r f ie ld L ight ing Contro l and Moni tor ing System Constant Current Regulators (power d i s t r ibut ion)
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Runway & Taxiway L ight ing
Runway Edge Lights
Runway Centerline Lights
Taxiway Edge Lights
Taxiway Centerline Lights
Touchdown Zone Lights
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Ai r f ie ld Guidance Signs
Runway Hold Signs
Taxiway Guidance Signs
Distance Remaining Signs
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Approach L ight ing Systems
ALSF - 2
ALSF - 1
MALSR
REIL
PAPI
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Ai r f ie ld L ight ing Control Systems
Lighting intensity settings
Operational segregation
Circuit monitoring
Energy usage recording
Diagnostics
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Constant Current Regulators (Power Dis t r ibut ion)
Stand-alone Format
Any size airfield
Easy to relocate
Simple control contacts
Lower initial cost
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Constant Current Regulators (Power Dis t r ibut ion)
Switch-gear Format
Larger airfields
Less time to install
Integrated control
Higher initial cost
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
L ight ing Str ing Conf igurat ions
Paral le l L ight ing Ci rcui t Ser ies L ight ing Ci rcui t
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
L ight ing Circui t Ground Faul ts
S ingle Faul t Mul t ip le Faul ts
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
What are the root causes of improper ly scoped Ai r f ie ld E lectr ical System projects?
1) Lack of ai r f ield electr ical des ign expert i se & exper ience
2) Fai l ing to coordinate ai r f ield l ight ing and paving projects
3) Understanding that ‘meet ing standards’ can st i l l result in a
poor ly des igned ai r f ield l ight ing systems
4) Fai lure to proper ly cons ider the inputs of ai r f ield operat ions and ai r f ield maintenance staff
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Expert ise & Experience
1 Ai r f ie ld l ight ing i s h ighly regulated area of des ign
2 Close interrelat ionship of c iv i l and electr ical des ign
3 Cost of mistakes i s very high in dol lars, operat ional impact and
project v i s ibi l i ty
4 Des ign problems may not be apparent unt i l months or years after
substant ial complet ion
5 Fast pace of technology change and regulatory impact requires
fami l iar i ty wi th industry
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Coordinated Pavement and Light ing Design
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Minimum Standards Misses Opportuni t ies
DESIGN DIRECTIVE Save on construction cost by us ing exist ing handhole/manhole duct bank system
DESIGN DIRECTIVE Save on t rouble shoot ing costs by implement ing a pul lcan plaza based duct bank system
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
F ie ld Example – Neglect ing Input f rom O&M Staf f
O&M Design Vacuum
Operational impact
2 wire sizes required
Improper equipment placement
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Design f rom a Systems Perspect ive for Energy Savings
1. LED air f ield l ight ing f ixtures (Savings: over 50% energy reduct ion)
2. Properly s ized Constant Current Regulators (Savings: 10% - 20% energy reduct ion)
3. Air f ield operations based l ight ing control system (Savings: 10% - 30% energy reduct ion)
4. Duct bank system designed f rom an O&M perspective (Savings: reduced “col lateral damage” by reducing maintenance and operat ional impact)
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Edwards AFB, CA Runway 4-22 Reconstruction Design-Build
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Andrews AFB, MD Apron 6B Reconstruction Design-Build
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Andrews AFB, MD: Apron Rehabi l i tat ion
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Randolph AFB: Taxiway G Reconstruction, Design-Build
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Consequences of Improper DB Project Scoping
1. Engineer Works for the Contractor 2. Short Term Repairs 3. Increased Costs
- Project and Infrastructure - Operational Impacts
4. Shorter Infrastructure Life
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Repair-Reconstruct Runway and Taxiway Pavement without Shoulder and Lighting Replacement
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Results: 4 Different Pavement Surfaces and Ages
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Taxiway W Shoulder Pavement - 2000
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
“Repaired” Shoulder Pavement – 2014
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Summary and Recommendations
1. Airfield Design-Bui ld project execution is l ikely to remain a contracting option and reality
2. Most common element in fai led project execution is improper scoping.
3. Be prepared with and Airfield Master Plan in order to assess, quanti fy, and prioritize improvement projects
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Develop an Air f ie ld Master/Act ion Plan
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Develop an Air f ie ld Master/Act ion Plan
Andrews
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Summary and Recommendations
4. Plan and Scope Projects from an Asset Management Plan Perspective
- Operations Priority, Systems and Maintenance Perspective
- Airfield Activity Manager is Key. Must be empowered and involved in project planning and coordination.
- AFPD 32-10 Activity Management Plans
5. DB Project Team Must be Airfield Qualif ied and Experienced
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
DB Project Team Member Qual i f icat ions
Air f ield Design-Build Projects requires the fol lowing team members:
Owner: Must have a Project Manager with a technical understanding of airfield design criteria and who will solicit input from operations and maintenance staff Design Engineer: Must have specific project experience in airfield electrical & paving design Electrical Contractor: Must have specific project experience in airfield electrical construction Pavement Contractor: Must have specific project experience in airfield pavement construction Use UFC 3-260-11FA “Model Design-Build (D-B) Request for Proposal for Airfield Contracts”. Good information on formulating projects
M I L I T A R Y D E S I G N G R O U P D e l t a A i r p o r t C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c
BURGESS ENGINEERING Ai r f ie ld L ight ing & NavAid Des ign
Mat thew W. Kundrot , P .E .
Mi l i ta ry Des ign Group, De l ta A i rpor t Consu l tants , Inc .
www.del taa i rpor t .com
804-275-8301
Dav id A. Burgess , P .E . , L t . Co l . ( re t )
Burgess Eng ineer ing, PLLC
www.daburgess .com
571-283-4137
