Design/Teleological Argument AS Revision Peter Thistlethwaite Wellington College.
Design argument 2
-
Upload
nightlizard90 -
Category
Documents
-
view
123 -
download
2
Transcript of Design argument 2
INTRO
bull Teleological
bull God is intelligent designer
bull Aposteriori and inductive
Order Purpose Regularity
bull Order = the universe follows rules
bull Regularity = the universe acts in regular and predictable ways
bull Purpose = this movement is not aimless there is a purpose
Aquinasrsquo 5th Way
bull ldquoSome intelligent being exists by whom all natural beings are directed to their end this being we call Godrdquo
bull There are unintelligent things that still have a purpose so they must be directed by intelligent things
Paley
bull Analogical theory
bull Watch is mechanical universe is made of lots of different parts that fit together like the watch
bull Universe is complex it must have been designed
Richard Swinburne
bull The universe is ordered not chaotic It follows a pattern suggesting a higher intelligence
FR Tennant
bull Aesthetic Argument Universe is ldquosaturated with beautyrdquo but beauty has no purpose
bull Anthropic Principle The universe is perfectly suited to sustain life as though nature plans in advance
Weakness - Aposteriori
bull Our experience is limited we have never experienced an un-designed world
bull The conclusion is not certain only probable
Weakness ndash Evil and suffering
bull Do not help to sustain life
bull Why would a designer include them
Weakness ndash David Hume
bull Analogical argument is weak
bull Illusion of design what is an un-designed world
bull Team of designers
Weakness ndash Richard Dawkins
bull Humans are purpose-driven so will assume that the universe has a purpose
bull Small chances could cause the universe
Weakness ndash Charles Darwin
bull Why would there need to be evolution and natural selection if the world had an intelligent designer
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
Order Purpose Regularity
bull Order = the universe follows rules
bull Regularity = the universe acts in regular and predictable ways
bull Purpose = this movement is not aimless there is a purpose
Aquinasrsquo 5th Way
bull ldquoSome intelligent being exists by whom all natural beings are directed to their end this being we call Godrdquo
bull There are unintelligent things that still have a purpose so they must be directed by intelligent things
Paley
bull Analogical theory
bull Watch is mechanical universe is made of lots of different parts that fit together like the watch
bull Universe is complex it must have been designed
Richard Swinburne
bull The universe is ordered not chaotic It follows a pattern suggesting a higher intelligence
FR Tennant
bull Aesthetic Argument Universe is ldquosaturated with beautyrdquo but beauty has no purpose
bull Anthropic Principle The universe is perfectly suited to sustain life as though nature plans in advance
Weakness - Aposteriori
bull Our experience is limited we have never experienced an un-designed world
bull The conclusion is not certain only probable
Weakness ndash Evil and suffering
bull Do not help to sustain life
bull Why would a designer include them
Weakness ndash David Hume
bull Analogical argument is weak
bull Illusion of design what is an un-designed world
bull Team of designers
Weakness ndash Richard Dawkins
bull Humans are purpose-driven so will assume that the universe has a purpose
bull Small chances could cause the universe
Weakness ndash Charles Darwin
bull Why would there need to be evolution and natural selection if the world had an intelligent designer
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
Aquinasrsquo 5th Way
bull ldquoSome intelligent being exists by whom all natural beings are directed to their end this being we call Godrdquo
bull There are unintelligent things that still have a purpose so they must be directed by intelligent things
Paley
bull Analogical theory
bull Watch is mechanical universe is made of lots of different parts that fit together like the watch
bull Universe is complex it must have been designed
Richard Swinburne
bull The universe is ordered not chaotic It follows a pattern suggesting a higher intelligence
FR Tennant
bull Aesthetic Argument Universe is ldquosaturated with beautyrdquo but beauty has no purpose
bull Anthropic Principle The universe is perfectly suited to sustain life as though nature plans in advance
Weakness - Aposteriori
bull Our experience is limited we have never experienced an un-designed world
bull The conclusion is not certain only probable
Weakness ndash Evil and suffering
bull Do not help to sustain life
bull Why would a designer include them
Weakness ndash David Hume
bull Analogical argument is weak
bull Illusion of design what is an un-designed world
bull Team of designers
Weakness ndash Richard Dawkins
bull Humans are purpose-driven so will assume that the universe has a purpose
bull Small chances could cause the universe
Weakness ndash Charles Darwin
bull Why would there need to be evolution and natural selection if the world had an intelligent designer
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
Paley
bull Analogical theory
bull Watch is mechanical universe is made of lots of different parts that fit together like the watch
bull Universe is complex it must have been designed
Richard Swinburne
bull The universe is ordered not chaotic It follows a pattern suggesting a higher intelligence
FR Tennant
bull Aesthetic Argument Universe is ldquosaturated with beautyrdquo but beauty has no purpose
bull Anthropic Principle The universe is perfectly suited to sustain life as though nature plans in advance
Weakness - Aposteriori
bull Our experience is limited we have never experienced an un-designed world
bull The conclusion is not certain only probable
Weakness ndash Evil and suffering
bull Do not help to sustain life
bull Why would a designer include them
Weakness ndash David Hume
bull Analogical argument is weak
bull Illusion of design what is an un-designed world
bull Team of designers
Weakness ndash Richard Dawkins
bull Humans are purpose-driven so will assume that the universe has a purpose
bull Small chances could cause the universe
Weakness ndash Charles Darwin
bull Why would there need to be evolution and natural selection if the world had an intelligent designer
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
Richard Swinburne
bull The universe is ordered not chaotic It follows a pattern suggesting a higher intelligence
FR Tennant
bull Aesthetic Argument Universe is ldquosaturated with beautyrdquo but beauty has no purpose
bull Anthropic Principle The universe is perfectly suited to sustain life as though nature plans in advance
Weakness - Aposteriori
bull Our experience is limited we have never experienced an un-designed world
bull The conclusion is not certain only probable
Weakness ndash Evil and suffering
bull Do not help to sustain life
bull Why would a designer include them
Weakness ndash David Hume
bull Analogical argument is weak
bull Illusion of design what is an un-designed world
bull Team of designers
Weakness ndash Richard Dawkins
bull Humans are purpose-driven so will assume that the universe has a purpose
bull Small chances could cause the universe
Weakness ndash Charles Darwin
bull Why would there need to be evolution and natural selection if the world had an intelligent designer
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
FR Tennant
bull Aesthetic Argument Universe is ldquosaturated with beautyrdquo but beauty has no purpose
bull Anthropic Principle The universe is perfectly suited to sustain life as though nature plans in advance
Weakness - Aposteriori
bull Our experience is limited we have never experienced an un-designed world
bull The conclusion is not certain only probable
Weakness ndash Evil and suffering
bull Do not help to sustain life
bull Why would a designer include them
Weakness ndash David Hume
bull Analogical argument is weak
bull Illusion of design what is an un-designed world
bull Team of designers
Weakness ndash Richard Dawkins
bull Humans are purpose-driven so will assume that the universe has a purpose
bull Small chances could cause the universe
Weakness ndash Charles Darwin
bull Why would there need to be evolution and natural selection if the world had an intelligent designer
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
Weakness - Aposteriori
bull Our experience is limited we have never experienced an un-designed world
bull The conclusion is not certain only probable
Weakness ndash Evil and suffering
bull Do not help to sustain life
bull Why would a designer include them
Weakness ndash David Hume
bull Analogical argument is weak
bull Illusion of design what is an un-designed world
bull Team of designers
Weakness ndash Richard Dawkins
bull Humans are purpose-driven so will assume that the universe has a purpose
bull Small chances could cause the universe
Weakness ndash Charles Darwin
bull Why would there need to be evolution and natural selection if the world had an intelligent designer
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
Weakness ndash Evil and suffering
bull Do not help to sustain life
bull Why would a designer include them
Weakness ndash David Hume
bull Analogical argument is weak
bull Illusion of design what is an un-designed world
bull Team of designers
Weakness ndash Richard Dawkins
bull Humans are purpose-driven so will assume that the universe has a purpose
bull Small chances could cause the universe
Weakness ndash Charles Darwin
bull Why would there need to be evolution and natural selection if the world had an intelligent designer
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
Weakness ndash David Hume
bull Analogical argument is weak
bull Illusion of design what is an un-designed world
bull Team of designers
Weakness ndash Richard Dawkins
bull Humans are purpose-driven so will assume that the universe has a purpose
bull Small chances could cause the universe
Weakness ndash Charles Darwin
bull Why would there need to be evolution and natural selection if the world had an intelligent designer
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
Weakness ndash Richard Dawkins
bull Humans are purpose-driven so will assume that the universe has a purpose
bull Small chances could cause the universe
Weakness ndash Charles Darwin
bull Why would there need to be evolution and natural selection if the world had an intelligent designer
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
Weakness ndash Charles Darwin
bull Why would there need to be evolution and natural selection if the world had an intelligent designer
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
Strength ndash Relatable
bull We all experience the universe which the argument is based on (Aposteriori)
bull We can all see the order purpose and regularity
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole
Strength ndash Cumulative Effect
bull All arguments for Godrsquos existence are comprehensive and persuasive when viewed as a whole