DESCRIPTION OF 3225 Knud J0rgensen, Thorsten Kruse, … · ity of pedestrian victims (77.4 percent)...
Transcript of DESCRIPTION OF 3225 Knud J0rgensen, Thorsten Kruse, … · ity of pedestrian victims (77.4 percent)...
DESCRIPTION OF 3225 VICTIMS OF ROAD-TRAFFIC-ACCIDENT TRAUMA ACCORDING TO TYPE OF ACCIDENT, SEVERITY OF INJURY, AND
NATURE OF LESIONS SUSTAINED
by
Knud J0rgensen, Thorsten Kruse, Ronald L . Somers, Rainer Weeth
Accident Analysis Group Odense University Hospital
Odense, Denmark
The object ives of the pr esent study were as fol lows:
1 . To establish the frequency of road-traffic -accident t raurna in a def ined area surrounding the munic ipality of Odense, Denrnark in 19787
2. To determine the d istribution of inj ured traff ic-accident victims by type of accident respons ible for their trauma;
3. �o characterize the severity of the inj uries sustained;
4. To summarize the nature of the inj uries sustained in terrns of body reg ions affected and region-specifi c lesions .
Al l data were collected by the Accident Analysis Group which maintains a trauma registry operating out of the eme r gency roorn at the Oden8e University Hospita l .
1 3
Description of the trauma regi stry
Since February 1972 information on a l l road-traff ic-accident victims presenting to the emergency room has been collected on a spec ial registry form . Thi s form includes personal information on the injured pa rty, medical informat ion about the injuries sustained, and a descr iption of the circumstances surrounding the accident . From year to year par t s of thi s form have been modified to focus on spec i f i c research i s sues. In 1978 AIS coding was incorporated for the f i r st t ime. The registry catchment area includes a popu lation of approximately 230,000 persons l iving in the mixed urban and rural area surrounding the municipality of Odense, Denmark. The only o f f icial emergency rnedical fac i l ity within the catchment area is at the Odense Univer s ity Hospital where accident registration takes place.
The trauma regi stry records the type of accident in which vict irns are involved according to the vi ctim's mode of transport (e . g. , bicycle, automobile, walking, etc. ) and the type of obj ect with which the v i ctim impacted. The severity of the injur ies sustained by victims is characterized in the registry using both AIS coding and a designation as to the type of medical management required by the victim sub sequent to treatment in the ernergency room (e . g., fol low-up treatment by farnily practit ioner, adrnis s ion to hospital, etc.). Also inc luded is a notation as to whether the victirn died of h i s injur ies within 30 days of the accident .
For purposes of the present study the body was divided into the f o l lowing nine regions: brain, head (excluding brain), neck, spine, ehest, abdomen, pelvis, arrns, and legs. The lesions to each region of the victim's body were characterized as being either to "soft tis sue" or to "bone or j oint" for regions other than the brain. Brain lesions were characterized as either suspected concus s ion, concus s ion or contus ion .
Results
In 1978 3, 225 road-traf f ic trauma vict ims were registered in and around the municipality of Odens e . A distribution of these v i c t ims by type of accident i s presented i n Table 1. Six maj or categories of accidents are shown as well as f i fteen subcatego-. ries which include ref erence to the nature of the obj ect impacted by the v i ctim . Moving objects with which the acc ident victims impacted are grouped according to their mass and speed potent ial relative to the victim's mode of transport.
For each type of accident the severity of inj uries sustained i s represented in two ways. First, a d i str ibution of victims i s given by the highest AIS code which was a s signed t o their inj ur ies; second, vict ims are d i stributed according to the extent of
1 4
Vl
Ta
bl
e
1.
Di
st
ri
bu
ti
on
o
f
ro
ad
-t
ra
ff
ic
-a
cc
id
en
t
tr
au
ma
v
ic
tim
s
by
t
yp
e
of
a
cc
id
en
t,
se
ve
ri
ty
o
f
in
ju
ry
a
nd
e
xt
en
t
of
m
ed
ic
al
ma
na
ge
me
nt
r
eq
ui
re
d.
TYPE
OF
ACCI
DENT
1 !
1 . .
. .
. Di
stri
buti
on o
f vi
ctim
s by
!
1 .
D�st
r1bu
t10�
of
v1ct
1ms
by
type
of
medi
cal
mana
geme
nt
j •1 hl ghe
st a
ss1 g
ned
AIS
code
re
qui r
ed s
ubse
quen
t to
:
i tr
eatm
ent
in c
asua
lty
room
1 Pe
rcen
-c:
..
... c:
•
ro
,...-c:
:: ,.
..-o
Nu1Rb
er
tage
of
·�
"'.�
"'·�
..
... 1
f t
t l
...::-.�
;!:
:: ......
•
;!::: �
g
0 0
a 1
Q.)
•r-cn
ci
� +'
c.
.•.-·-
""C
• •
• •
C:
E>.
. cn
C.
(1)
8..
.+JQ)
v1 cb
ms v
1 cb
ms 1
0 l
2 3
4 5
6 °
"'
-<=
0-<::: "'
o
-o
"'· �
j
z
U-. C.
. =:
::: O""C
::C
C1'
CL""C
ä TCY
ctr=
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
,==
==
==
=
==
==
==
=�=
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
==
·==
=-
==
==
==-
==
==
==
=:=
==
==
=�=
==
==
=·
1
vs.
pede
stri
an o
r bi
cycl
e 56
;
l 39
15
l
0 0
0 31
11
9
5 0
vs.
mope
d, m
otor
cycl
e/sc
oote
r, c
ar o
r tr
uck
227
l 6
152
51
8 4
l 5
115
28
24
54
6 vs
. ct
rer
movi
na o
r st
atio
narv
ob j
ect
i ncl
. ro
ad s
urfa
ce
990
; 14
75
2 20
3 16
5
0 0
479
210
144
156
l al
l bi
cvcl
e a cc
iden
ts 12
73 ·
39
.5 1
21
943
269
25
9 l
5 62
5 24
9 17
7 21
5 7
MOTO
RCYC
LE/S
COOT
EE
vs.
pede
stri
an,
bicy
cle,
mop
ed o
r mo
torc
ycle
/sco
oter
vs
. ca
r or
tru
ck
vs.
othe
r mo
vina
or
stat
iona
rv ob
iect i
ncl .
roa
d su
rfac
e al
l mo
torc
vcle
/sco
oter
acc
iden
ts
MOPE
D
8 53
96
157
1 1 !
0 1 1 l .
3 4.
9 ! 4
7 34
53
94
0 10
34
44
vs.
pede
stri
an,
bicy
cle
or m
oped
45
l
32
9 vs
. mo
torc
ycle
/sco
oter
, ca
r or
tru
ck
209
4 13
0 56
vs
. ot
her
movi
na o
r st
atio
narv
obi
ect
incl
. ro
ad s
urfa
ce
433
lO
305
no
a 11
mope
d ac
ci de
nts
1 b
87
21. 3
i 1
5 46
7 175
CA
R vs
. pe
dest
rian
, bi
cycl
e, m
oped
or
moto
rcyc
le/s
coot
er
vs.
car
or t
ruck
vs
. ot
her
movi
na o
r st
atio
narv
obj
ect
incl
. ro
ad s
urfa
ce
all
car
acci
dent
s
PEDE
STRI
AN
vs.
bicy
cle
or m
oped
vs
. mo
torc
ycle
/sco
oter
, ca
r or
tru
ck
vs.
othe
r mo
vina
veh
icle
al
l oe
dest
rian
acc
iden
ts
all
othe
r tr
affi
c ac
cide
nts
ALL
TRAF
FIC
ACCI
DENT
S
13
466
339
818
; 0
11
l 1 28
312
88
12
209
88
25.4
! 40
53
2 17
7
41 1
3 30
6
171
i 3
76
61
9 1
0 5
2 22
1 1
6. 9 1
6 11
1 69
69 1
2. l
l 1
51
13
' 32
25 1
100.
0 j 87
21
98
747
0 0
6 0
4 2
10
2
3 0
14
2 6
2 23
4
l 2 0 3
0 0 0 0
0 0
2 1
0 0
2 1
0 0
0 l
25
4 8
l 15
5
6 4
40
9-14
0
2 0
0 0
16
5 4
6 l
0 l
0 19
5
5 6
1 2
1 0
118
31
26
18
4 28
40
72
1 6 14
21
2 2 14
18
20
6 10
93
29
24
21
7 65
81
330
100
115
7 3
254
56
145
60
406
119
26
4 60
12
5
0 91
16
41
8
1565
51
3
l 41
24
00
2 11 2 15
8
399
0 16
28
44
l l 0 2
9 0
60
3 70
0
! TJg-
-3
1
l l
107
8 10
2 8
�-T7
9 0
79
9 l
l 89
10
12
0
709
39
the medical management that they required subsequent to their treatment in the emergency room.
Several useful facts can be di scerned in Table 1. F i r s t , it i s clear that two-wheel vehicles account f o r the maj ority (65.6 percent ) of inj ured accident v ictims in Odense. Bicycle accident s in particu lar contr ibute heav i ly to the total. For each type of two-wheeler, bicyc l e , moped and motorcycle/scooter, the maj ority of injured vict ims results from sing le-party col li s i o n s , i.e., colli s i ons with stat ionary obj ects o r f a l l s from the vehicle . ( Single-party col l i s i ons are designated as col l i sions with 11other moving or stationary obj ect including road surface" in Table 1.) Single-party col l i s ions also account for a large number of v i ct ims inj ured in automobile accident s , although most such vict ims result from multi-party c o l l i s ions. The vast maj ority of pedestrian victims (77.4 percent) results from accidents involving heavy mov ing vehicles.
If attention i s turnea from the total number of victims result ing f rom each type of acc ident to the number of severely injured vict ims, the relative contribution of the accident types changes somewhat . Of the 75 persons regi stered whose most severe inj ury was a s s i gned an AIS code of 4, 5 or 6, s l i ghtly more (29) were victims of automobile accidents than were vict ims of two-wheeler accidents (27) • A higher proportion of automobi le victims (3.5 percent ) was ass igned AIS codes of 4 or higher than was the case for r iders of motorcycles/scooters (3.2 percent), bicycles (1.2 percent), or mopeds (l.O percent). As compared to automo-
bile vict ims , the proport ions for the latter two groups are s ign i f icantly smal ler at the . O l level. These f i ndings probably result f r om d i ff ering characteri s t i c s of both the accident circumstances ( impact veloci ties, etc . ) and the people involved ( age of v ictims, etc.).
In terms of the use of hospital inpat ient fac i l i t ies for accident trauma v i ctims, two-whee lers agai.n contribute the greatest part. Among vict ims who did not die as a result of their injur i e s , r i ders of two-wheel vehicles accounted f o r f u l ly 56.1 percent of those for whom hospital admiss ion was necessary. The picture changes however when considering the type of acc ident which leads to the maj ority of fatal ities registered. Of the 39 victims who died within 30 days of exper iencing severe accident trauma, 17 (43.6 percent) had been involved in automobi le accidents. Fewe r , 12 (30.8 percent), were v i ct ims of two-wheeler accidents.
Tables 2 through 6 present, for f ive maj or types of traffic accidents , the number of vict ims experiencing injury to each of nine body regions. For each region, percentage di stribut ions of vict ims are shown by type of the severest lesion sustained and highest AIS score assigned to the region . For the brain, lesions were cla s s if ied as suspected concus sion, concuss ion, and contus i o n . For all other body region s , lesions were c las s i f i ed a s s o f t t i s sue, bone o r jo int , other o r unknown . The latter two
16
"
Ta
bl
e
2.
Na
tu
re
a
nd
s
ev
er
it
y
of
i
nj
ur
ie
s
to
s
pe
ci
fi
ed
b
od
y
re
gi
on
s
am
on
g
bi
cy
cl
e
ri
de
rs
. O
de
ns
e,
19
78
.
REGI
ON
VICT
IMS
WITH
PE
RCEN
TAGE
DIS
TRIB
UTIO
N OF
VIC
TIMS
PE
RCEN
TAGE
DIS
TRIB
UTIO
N OF
VIC
TIMS
WIT
H OF
l!l
JURY
TO
WI
TH I
NJUR
Y TO
REG
ION
BY T
YPE
OF
INJU
RY T
O RE
GIOfl
BY
HIGH
EST
AIS
CODE
BO
DY
REGI
ON
MOST
SER
IOUS
LES
ION
IN R
EGIO
N AS
SIGN
EO T
O RE
GION
.._
Q)
.J:>
E
::::>
z
+ SR
AIN
10
8
HEAO
(EXC
L. B
RAIN
) 4
58
NECK
1
3
SPIN
E 1
'=' ......
CHES
T 4
5
ABDO
MEN
12
PELV
IS
:30
ARMS
4
68
LEGS
3
"�7
ALL
REGI
ONS
15
44
( l) + Q)
::
::> ..
.. "'
�"'
0
·�
(,/)
-
26
.9
84
.1
84
.6
69
.2
68
.9
83
.3
90
.0
66
.2
83
.1
( 2)
+
.._
0 ..
... Q)
<:
: <:
: ·�
0
0
CO
·�
63
.9
13
.1
15
.4
30
.8
28
.9
0.
0
10
.0
31
. �.
15
.4
74
.0
2
3.
3
(3) +
<::
:>:
.._
0
Q)
<::
...c:
..:.::
1 ..
.. <:
: 0
=
8.
3
0.
9
0.
4
2.
4
o.
o
0.
0
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
2.
2
16
.7
o
.o
0.
0
o.
o
0.
9
1.
:3
0.
5
1.
0
1.
2
1.
5
0 l
2
o.
o
2E:
. 7
6
3.
0
0.
2
91
.5
6
.8
7.
7
76
.9
7
.7
7.
7
53
.8
1
5.
4
2.
2
6c
.• 7
2
0.
0
0.0
8
3.
3
o.
o
10
.0
7
6.
7
13
.3
:3.
0
71
.4
2
3.
9
3.
5
77
.8
1
5.
9
2.
:3
76
.0
1
8.
8
Type
s of
bra
in l
esio
ns:
(1) =
susp
ecte
d co
ncus
sion
, (2)
� co
ncus
sion
, (3)
= co
ntus
ion
3
4.
6
0.
4
7.
7
23
.1
8.
9
0.
0
o.
o
1.
5
2.
0
1.
9
4
0.
9
0.
4
0.0
0.
0
o.
o
16
.7
o.
o
0?
·
-
0.
8
0.
6
5 6
().
9
1.
9
0.
0
0.
7
0.
0
o.
o
o.
o
0.
0
o.
o
2.
2
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
0.
1
0.
4
00
Ta
bl
e
3.
Na
tu
re
a
nd
s
ev
er
it
y
of
i
nj
ur
ie
s
to
s
pe
ci
fi
ed
b
od
y
re
gi
on
s
am
on
g m
ot
or
cy
cl
e/
sc
oo
te
r
ri
de
rs
. O
de
ns
e,
1978
.
REGI
ON
1 VICTI
MS W
ITH
PERC
ENTA
GE J
VST�
IBUT
ION
OF V
ICTI
HS
PrnCE
NTAG
E DI
STRI
BUTI
ON O
F VI
CTIH
S WI
TH
OF
. IN
JURY
TO
90DY
i
REGI
ON
1....
"'
..0
E
::::>
=
3F.A I:
� +
1 ! 2
2
1 HEA
C (EXC
L. BR
A I'!)
! 2
2
i NEC
K i 1
-, .:..
1 SP
INE
i .-,
:
.:.. !
CHES
T •"")
.:
:...
ABDO
MEN
-,
.::...
PELV
IS
i 1
1
ARMS
1
60
1 LE
GS
88
ALL
REGI
ONS
21
1
WITH
INJ
URY
TO R
EGIO
N BY
TYP
E OF
i-lO
ST S
E�IO
US L
ESIO
N IN
REG
ION
( 1) + "'
::
::> ..
.... �>
._
Cl)
0 ·
�
(,') ..
....
1�:.
,:_.
t.:.:=:.
2
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
72
.7
70
.0
78
.4
(2) +
1....
0 �
"'
<:
: <:
: ·�
0
0
c:
::: ·-
72.
7
27
. :�:
0.
0
0.
0
o.
<)
o.
o
18
.2
30
.0
19
.3
(f.::::.
7
2E
: . <)
(3) +
<::
�
1....
0
"'
<::
..c.
�
......
<::
Cl
=
13
.6
o.
o
4.
5
0.
0
0.
0
o.
o
0.
0
o.
0
o.
(l o
.o
o.
o
0.
0
'7. 1
o
.o
0.
0
0.
0
o.
o
2.
3
2.
4
0.
9
INJU
RY T
O RE
GION
BY
HIGH
EST
AIS
CODE
AS
SIGN
EO T
O RE
GION
() l
2 3
4 c; .)
0.
0
1::::.
6 7
2.7
4.
5
0.
0
9.
1
4.
5
t_:.:3.
2
27.:
�: 0
.0
o
.o
0
.0
o.
o
50
.0
o
. 0
0
.0
o
.o
5
0.
0
0.
0
10
0.
0
o.
o
0.
0
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
50
.0
o
.o
5
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
1 0
.0
1
00
.0
0
.0
0
.0
o
.o
0
.0
9.
1
6:3
.6
2
7.
3
0.
0
o.
o
o.
o
1. 7
6
6.
7
25
.0
6
.7
0
.0
o
.o
1.
1
72
.7
1
5.
9
8.
0
2.
3
0.
0
1.
9
64
.0
2
5.
6
6.
2
0.
9
1.
4
+ Ty
pes
of b
rain
les
ions
: (1
) =
su
spec
ted
conc
ussi
on,
(2)
=
conc
ussi
on,
(3) =
cont
usio
n
6
C>.
0
o.
o
o.
0
0.
0
o.
(>
0.
0
0.
0
o.
o
0.
0
o.
o
\D
Ta
bl
e
4.
REGI
ON
OF
20DY
+ BR
AlfJ
HEAD
(EXC
L. B
RAIN
) NE
CK
SPIN
E
CHES
T
ABDO
MEN
PELV
IS
ARMS
LEGS
ALL
REGI
ONS
Na
tu
re
a
nd
s
ev
er
it
y
of
i
nj
ur
ie
s
to
s
pe
ci
f i
ed
b
od
y
re
gi
on
s
am
on
g
mo
pe
d
ri
de
rs
. O
de
ns
e,
1978
.
1 VI
CT W
S lllTH 1
l!UUR
Y TO
RE
GION
; 1
<..
Q)
.D
e
:::>
:?::
80
15
1
5
15
29
6
.-,-,
.;;..&;.
2';'1
8
'.'.::59
1
9t
.5
PEi<.C
E;JT
AGE
01ST
RIBLl
TIOtl
OF
VICT
IMS
WIT4
IHJ
U�Y
TO R
EGIO
N BY
TYP
E OF
HO
ST S
ERIO
US L
ESIO
N IN
REG
ION
( 1) + Q)
"'
..
.... "'
-
"'
0 ·
�
:.r.--
22
.5
715
. :=:
10
0.
0
80
.0
4·-
· .-
. C
• •.
;:,.
10
0.
0
72
.7
71
.1
80
.5
( 2) +
<..
0 ..
.... Q)
c:
c:
·�
0
0
::
:::::: ·--i
70
.0
19
.9
0.
0
20
.0
41
.4
0.
0
22
.7
26
.2
18
.1
71
. :::
: 2
5.
:=:
--
(3) +
c:
;.,
<..
0
Q)
c:
�
-"'
......
0
=
7.
5
o. c)
0.
7
2.
tE.
0.
0
o.o
0.
0
o.o
o.o
1
0.
3
0.
0
o.o
4.
5
0.
0
o.:
::: 2
. :::
:
c). :::
: 1
. 1
1. 0
1
.9
PERC
ENTA
GE D
ISTR
IBUT
ION
OF V
ICTI
MS W
ITH
INJU
RY T
O RE
GION
BY
HIGH
EST
AIS
CODE
AS
SIGN
ED T
O RE
.J!Oil
0 l
2
0.
0
2:::
:.8
7
0.
0
1.
::::
==:s. 1
·�
-3
0.
0
10
0.
0
o.o
6.
7
7·-=
· 'j
·-
·· .._.
1
�:.
3
10
.:::
: 4
E:.
::: :
24
.1
o.
o
o ...
... �
._
• ..:;.a.
·-·
o.o
4.
5
72
.7
1
8.
2
2.
0
71
. 8
2
4.
2
2.
2
77
.4
1
4.
E:
2.
2
72
. <)
21
. 6
'l ./
0.
0
0.
7
o.o
6.
7
1:3
. e:
0.
(>
4.
5
1. 7
4.
7
::::„ (>
4
1. :::
:
0.
7
o.o
o.o
:=:. 4
16
.7
o.o
<). �
:
<). 8
(>. ::::
+ Ty
pes
of b
rain
les
ions
: (1
) =
su
spec
ted
conc
ussi
on,
(2)
= co
ncus
sion
, (3
) =
co
ntus
ion
5 6
:�:. E
: 1
. :�:
o.o
o
.o
o.o
o
.o
0.
0
0.
0
o. 0
o
.o
o.o
o
.o
o.o
0
.0
o.o
o
.o
o.o
0
.0
0.
::::
0.
1
N>
0
Ta
bl
e
5.
Na
tu
re
a
nd
s
ev
er
it
y
of
i
nju
ri
es
t
o
sp
ec
if
ie
d
bo
dy
r
eg
io
ns
a
mo
ng
p
eo
pl
e
ri
di
ng
i
n
ca
rs
. O
de
ns
e,
19
78
.
REG
IOtl
1 VI
CTIM
S W
ITHI
PERC
ENTA
GE u
lST
RIBU
TIO
N OF
V
ICT
IMS
! PE
RCEN
TAGE
DIS
TRI
BUT
ION
OF V
ICT
IMS
WIT
H OF
BO
�Y
BRA
IN +
1 i 1
HEAD
(EX
CL.
BRA
lN)
NECK
SPIN
E
CHES
T
ABDO
MEN
P ELV
I S
ARMS
LEGS
ALL
REGI
ONS
INJU
RY
TO
! RE
GION
.
'- "'
l -"°
e
::
:s =
1
15
0
1 4
10
1 \ i
57
l
29
1 1 1
14
!
25
21
21
2
1 1
78
11
96
WIT
H IN
JURY
TO
REG
IOI:
gy T
YPE
OF
MOST
SER
1 OUS
LES
1 ON
Hl RE
G 1 ON
(1)
+
Q)
:::s
...... "'
..
.... (/)
0
·�
(/")
......
26
.0
86
.1
S'9
.5
72
.4
60.
5
88
.0
:;-€:. 1
6C
.•
5
73
.6
(2) +
'- 0 ......
Q)
c:
c: ·
�
0
0
= -�
64
.0
� ' -:?.
8.
8
27
.6
:32
.5
o.o
47
.6
29
.7
20
. :=:
69
.8
2
4.
7
(3) +
c:
"'
'-0
Q)
c:
-<=
�
......
c:
=
=
:�. 7
1.
:3
0.
7
::: :.
4
0.
0
1.
8 <)
. 0
o.o
2.
6
5.
3
12
.0
o.
o 0
.0
1
4.
:3
1.
4
2.
4
3.
4
2.
2
2.
t:: .
2.
·�
: j i i i 1 i ! ' 1 1 1 1 ! i 1
INJU
RY T
O RE
GIO
N BY
HIG
HEST
AIS
COD
E AS
SIGN
EO T
O RE
GIOt>
G
o.
o
2.
7
1 ·-1 ":1
..
.. ·-
·
:::: .
4
C"
�-.
._) .
....:·
12. (>
9
.5
c .. �.
9.
0
1
26
.0
88
.E
:
77
.2
t.:.·;1
. 0
55
.3
40
.0
:3�
:. ::
: :
155
. e..
67
.4
2
65
.:3
6.
6
1.
8
13
.8
15
.:::
o.o
4-:1
•':;/
�-,
24
.5
14
.0
5.
C)
67
.4
1
9.
6
3 4
0.
7
2.
0
1.
5
0.
0
7.
0
0.
0
1:�:
. :=
: 0
.0
14
.0
1
.8
0.
0
28
.0
9.5
4
.E
:
2.
4
0.
9
8.
4
1.
1
4.
4
1. 4
+ Ty
pes
of b
rai n
les
ions
: ( 1)
= su
sp ed
ed c
oncu
ssi o
n,
( 2) =
conc
ussi
on,
( 3)
=
cont
usi o
n
5 C"
.-
. ·-·
· .,;..
0
.-,
. .::..
0.
0
0.
0
4.
4
16
.0
o. (>
o.o
o.o
1.
5
6
0.
7
0
�,
. .::..
1.
E:
0.
0
:=:. 5
4.
0
o.o
o.o
o.o
0.
7
N
Ta
bl
e
6.
Na
tu
re
a
nd
s
ev
er
it
y
of
i
nju
ri
es
t
o
sp
ec
if
ie
d
bo
dy
r
eg
io
ns
a
mo
ng
p
ed
es
tr
ia
ns
. O
de
ns
e,
1978
.
REG
ION
j VtCT
HIS \'l
lTH
; PE
RCEN
TAGE
01 ST
R IB
UT 1 O
N OF
VI
CT
I MS
PERC
ENTA
GE D
IST
RIBU
TIO
N OF
VIC
TIM
S W
ITH
OF
' IN
JURY
TO
WIT
H INJ
U�Y
TO R
EGIO
N BY
TYP
E OF
IN
JURY
TO
REGI
ON B
Y H
IGHE
ST A
IS C
ODE
BODY
RE
GION
MO
ST S
ERIO
üS L
ESIO
N llJ
REG
ION
ASS
IGNE
O TO
RE
GIO
N
'- Q)
.D
e
:::1
=
+
8RA
lt�
66
HEAD
(EX
CL.
BRA
IN)
:35
NECK
:
0
SPIN
E !
7
i CH
EST
1 1
0
i AB
DOME
N :
10
i 1
PELV
IS
1 1
7
ARMS
i 1 ! 5
9
; LE
GS
1 1
0�
:
ALL
REG
IONS
:3
57
;
(l)
+
(J.)
:::>
+'
(1)
.._
(1)
0 ·
�
� +'
12
.1
85
.9
0.
0
2:=
:. 1S
60
.0
... ( 2
) .
'- 0 +-
"'
.::::
.::::
·�
0
0
c::: .
........
1S�
:. e,
.
12
.9
o.
o
71
.4
:30
.0
' 1
00
.0
o
.o
1 1 1
52
.9
4
7.
1
66
.1
· -=·�
, .-,
-- •
.:.. .
..:..
64
.1
3
4.
0
5c;-
1.
7
::::4
. 5
( 3)
+ '- (J.)
.c
..
.... 0
24
.2
o.
o
0.
0
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
4.
5
.:::: ,,. 0
.::::
..:.:
.::::
=
o.
0
1 .-,
.
.:..
0.
0
o.
!)
10
.0
o.
o
0.
0
1.
7
1 c,
.
,
1.
4
1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1
G l
2
0.
0
1�
:. 6
1s:
:::. e.
1 .-,
.
.:..
·;;oo
.6
5
. 'i'
o.
o
C>.
0
o.
0
o.
0
2:=
:. tS
1
4.
3
0.
0
40
.0
1
0.
0
o.
o
50
.0
1
0.
0
0.
0
47
.1
41
.2
:3.
4
61
.0
3
0.
5
7.
E: 5
2.
4
24
.3
:::: .
1
54
. 1E,.
28
. (>
+ Ty
pes
of b
rain
les
ions
: (l
) =
su
spec
ted
conc
ussi
on,
(2)
= co
ncus
sion
, (3
) =
co
ntus
ion
3 4.
5
o.
o
0.
0
42
.9
30
.0
10
. 0
11
.8
5.
1
12
.6
7.
E:
4
�:.
o
1 ·: 1
. ._
0.
0
o.
(l
o.
0
20
.0
0.
0
o.
0
2.
�/
-, .-,
..:... .
.::...
5
9.
1
0.
0
o.
o
14
.3
10
. (l
10
.0
0.
0
0.
0
o.
o
-, C"
,C....
·-·
6
6.
1
1 .-,
.
..::..
0.
0
o.
o
10
.0
0.
0
o.
o
o.
o
o.
o
1. 7
categori e s were necessary for cases in which it was not meaningful to designate any particular region-specif ic lesion a s 1 1most severe " .
The inf ormat ion in Tables 2 - 6 i s useful in determining the areas of the body which are most in need of biomechanical prophylaxi s for spe c i f i c types of transportation situat ions . For a l l types of traff ic acc ident s , inj uries to the brain, head ( excluding bra in) , arm and leg were most common . A signi f i cant
number of ehest injur i e s among victims of automobile accident s was a l so noted . As expected, brain and head inj uries tend to represent the severest injuries sustained in terms of the threat to l i f e . ehest and abdomina l injuries among automobi leaccident victims were also frequently l i f e threatening . The maj or ity of brain lesions were c l a s s i f ied as concussions in al l types of accidents . Most frequently, for a l l types of accidents and a l l body regions ( other than the brain) , the severest l e s ion sustained was a soft-t i s sue lesion .
Discussion
I n setting prior i t i e s for the study and implementat ion of biomechanical methods to reduce the physica l inj ury caused by impact s , a diverse set of int erdependent criteria must be cons i dered. The questions of what is irnportant , what i s neces sary, and what i s possible must a l l be considered simultaneous ly . The value of hospital-based data in suggesting the answers to sorne of the relevant questions has been demonstrated rnany tirne s . Important c lues a s t o which problems are most in need o f immediate attention and which problems are not are often f orthcorning from such data . Neverthe l e s s , it is irnportant to bear in mind the l imitati ons of hospital-based data in genera l , including the data of the present study.
F i r st , it must be emphasi zed that the results of the 1978 registration of tr aff ic-acc ident trauma in Odense cannot be used d irect ly to determine e ither the r i sk of having a given type of acc ident, or the r i sk of sustaining inj ury having had an accident of a particular type . Prec ise calculation of both types of r i sk would only be pos s ible if a l l accident victims in the Odense area were regi stered regardless of whether inj ury was sustained or not . Experience has shown c learly however that many people involved in accidents do not seek emergency medical care and therefore are not regi stered . The probab i lity that such care i s sought i s inf luenced by such diverse f actors as the age of the person involved in the acc ident, the t ime and place of the acc ident, and the drama surrounding the accident as v i ewed by witnesses .
Despite the rather uncontrol led nature of the de facto sampling which is taking place, loca l experience ha s dernonstrated c learly
22
that nearly a l l of the re latively severe traff ic-accident injuries are recorded . As the f i r st a im of accident prevention must be to reduce the occurrance of tragic trauma, i . e . fatal and permanently d i s abling or d i s f iguring injuries, the information collected by the regi stry would seem to be that of greatest inherent value .
The f indings of the present study demonstrate, among other things, that a good deal more work needs to be done to improve restraint systems and steering co lumn character i s t i c s of automobile s . I t i s also c lear from the data that bicyc l i st s would prof it cons iderably from use of some sort of head protec t ion . In f act , the who l e area of head protection f or riders of two-whee l vehicles would seem to warrant further study .
2 3