Deployment Options With Hosted RCS
-
Upload
sebastian-schumann -
Category
Technology
-
view
362 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Deployment Options With Hosted RCS
10/27/2014– strictly confidential, confidential, internal, public – 1
DEPLOYMENT OPTIONS WITH HOSTED RCSSEBASTIAN SCHUMANN, SLOVAK TELEKOM29. October 2014. Berlin, Germany
SCOPE
What are the deployment options with hosted RCS solutions - ST rollout in Q2 2014
Evaluating the pros and cons of cloud solutions in RCS services
Is the technology finally ready
Case study
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 2
@s_schumann
Feedback is welcome, get in touch during/after the event!
SLOVAK TELEKOM
Former fixed/mobile incumbent (merger in 2010), Zoznam, Posam, DIGI
Diverse service portfolio (fixed/mobile network and communications services, Internet access + content, data services, CPE, ICT services (data center + cloud), radio/TV broadcasting, call center services, …)
The major shareholder is Deutsche Telekom AG.
Successful deployments in SEE as well as in DT group:
One of the biggest national-wide deployment of NGN technology in Europe in 2004, whole city migrated to all-IP NGN in 2007
Fixed network IMS migration to be finished in 2014
Leader in IPTV, offering hybrid sat TV (s. 2009) & OTT app (s. 2012)
Extensive FTTx deployments (360k households)
First nation-wide 4G/LTE network (s. 2013)October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 3
Slovak Telekom Group is the telecoms market leader in Slovakia
EXPECTATIONS
Honest & realistic dissemination of status quo from 1st hand
Deployed RCS 5 in H1/2014
Go-live 30. June 2014
My role: local technical manager for design and implementation
This presentation is going to be subjective in parts
Don’t judge me on that – this is why I am here
Experience with IMS, various RCS deployment options, messaging strategies in ST
Joyn as service needs to do move forward quickly, I will summarize on our fast execution & seen future potential
Focus on a bit of “How”, a lot of “What’s could be next” – not on “Why”
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 4
HOW?HOSTED JOYN SERVICE IMPLEMENTATION IN SLOVAK TELEKOM
Hosted RCS 5 (Blackbird) service provided by Jibe Mobile
No local NT implementation (no IMS/SBCs etc.)
Private cloud connected via public Internet
Jibe hub for interconnection
No local interconnection
Jibe hub provides technical interconnect with all Jibe clouds
Offers standard NNI
Launched with full set of services on localized Android and iOS apps
Messaging, file transfer, location share
High definition voice & video (much better quality than telephony)
Go live and operation without major hick-ups or failures
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 5
Bottom line
The implementation and joint work with Jibe was a success.
PRO’S & CON’S OF CLOUD DEPLOYMENTSHIGH-LEVEL
Fast
Cheap
None
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 6
PRO’S CON’S
PRO’S CON’S
PRO’S & CON’S OF CLOUD DEPLOYMENTSDETAILED
No or insignificant CAPEX, OPEX driven
Risk free: Can be killed early if KPI’s not met
All in one integrated solution (in our case)
Simpler interconnect
Easier accreditation
Jibe platform has much more features than usual local on-IMS deployments
No local IMS integration, deployment etc.
No local IMS deployment
VoLTE dependency (multiple “IMS”)
Regulatory or legal challenges (e.g. LI, data)
Large scale deployments may be more expensive
Potential vendor lock-in (UNI for apps, infrastructure)
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 7
LOOKING BACK TO 2012POINTS I RAISED LAST TIME AT THIS EVENT
“
joyn as “chat for mobile phones” is not going to convince alone
RCS as a platform may enable interesting use cases, if the concept is done right
joyn as platform/enabler not a bad idea as such, but it is not the new SMS!
What can Telco’s do once they have IMS or RCS infrastructure (for whatever reason)
Wrong: Look at what we can do with it. Create need or technical motivation. Joyn
Technology driven services and features are wrong!
Northbound integration of IMS service layer should not be an option, but a must!
… and should be done with Web 2.0 technologies/protocols
Integration is important (internally as well as opening for external access)
“
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 8
WHAT’S NEXT?
Joyn as a service started “not too successful”
“Too little, too late” – we all know about that, no need to repeat
Time moved on – simply put: The world is different in 2014!
Joyn as a platform may have a potential
That may be able to help the service
This is a case study partially taking our innovative platform as an example
It hopefully encourages others that got Joyn (one way or another) to quickly stop lamenting & see what to do next
Reach small fragment of customers that has Joyn, but much more importantly expose new functions
May not be best or cheapest option, but better than not progressing at all
May bring up to date APIs, integrated with some back-end systems
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 9
ONE PROBLEM WITH JOYN, AND HOW TO WORK AROUND ITUNIVERSAL IS GOOD, UNLESS YOU NEED BETTER
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 10
GOOD BETTER
WEBRTC TO THE RESCUE
No.
Maybe…
… but not really …
… and not only!
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 11
“BETTER” SOON TO BE THE DEFAULTWEBRTC CONTRIBUTES TO THE EVOLUTION
WebRTC is not so much about technology, but “embedded contextual communications” in the web/an app
No ubiquity needed
When I am on amazon.com I do not expect to be able to talk to Billa or the police through that website
When I am inside the IKEA app I do not expect to order a Pizza (maybe meat balls though )
Value shift from solving connectivity in the 1900s to solving actual problems
I am connected to a service the minute I enter their URL, RTC needed if it helps solving the problem
An entire industry (us!) mapped in a service feature
Known networks use known methods, unknown connections will not connect from the address book
Searching for business Results in Google Connect right from within the browser
Mobile entry point for “longer customer relation” is an app Soon to have inbuilt communication
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 12
THE DILEMMA
P2P communicating using stand-alone tools (integrated + apps) is most likely not going to evolve
Universal lowest common denominator service is here (telephony, SMS), not yet another one needed
Stand-alone app “market” saturated
Best ways for reaching existing known contacts established
Services today are defined by the front-end design/experience, the back-end technology is irrelevant for users
Joyn is built by technologists, mainly due to belief in IMS for everything and need to standardize everything
Does not mean defined NNI or operator bits and pieces not useful at all, but could be achieved better
How? There are two options
Give up (do nothing or think Joyn is enough for the next years)
Look forward (and make finally use of state of the art web technologies)
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 13
USE YOUR PLATFORM
If you deployed Joyn hopefully you did not just build a complex system, but also a bucket full of interesting APIs
SIP ISC interface is no API! We are talking HTTP REST + JSON!
Jibe brings many APIs out of the box, access to all the capabilities
Joyn by Jibe on iOS makes already use of these APIs certain assurance for us that it will not be forgotten
Benefits
Integrate capabilities elsewhere and focus on the new capabilities as enabler to build new services
Does not mean integrate RCS as a service itself, but rather some capabilities into web services to enhance those
Justification of new investments, use them as enabler to get new capabilities to integrate anywhere
Important footnote
I do not mean to buy an RCS platform for this purpose, rather utilizing enabler features that you get anyways
Web services do not need Telco back-ends most of the time and may often be solved better
If you have them though there is no need to ignore and neglect them
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 14
WE ARE DOGFOODING!
Not just talking API, but use it right away: Work on a use case and traverse it into reality within a couple of days (yes, literally!)
Use case development: Sample marketing campaign by using Joyn as video distribution platform
Celebrity records videos that are distributed to fans using Joyn
Reaching (optimistically) thousands of end points can’t shouldn’t be done manually
Using the Jibe platform API we were able to fully automate the process
Ridiculously fast: 1 month operating platform, 2-3 days implementation and it works!
Ingredients to our first (of many) use cases
Jibe platform API, internal SFTP for current subscribers list, content
Node.js SDK, several additional packages, all open-source
This use case is being elaborated and was a motivation for many of us to think beyond “the service”
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 15
TAKE-AWAYSTHE WEBIFICATION OF COMMUNICATION
If you do Joyn, have the right approach and get the right partner
Do not just blindly integrate to the IMS, do not only evaluate your AS for SIP ISC, but more importantly northbound integration capabilities using REST/JSON
Standardization aspect of add. capabilities irrelevant, simple REST API (maybe with SDK) more important
“Proprietary” per Telco definition ≠ Not usable by others (REST + doc/SDK completely fine for web developers)
Understand and acknowledge the tremendous change to our core business and its paradigms – “think web”
Standardized core technologies (HTML/CSS/JS, Objective-C, Java), but not services
Standardized interfaces (REST API w/ doc/SDK is enough) trumps complex E2E scenarios
Ownership of the screen has a huge impact of how service experience is created
It is imperative that any new service is considered both from technology and service evolution perspectives
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 16
SUMMARY
Honest thoughts that should have overall positive notion, despite certain critical annotations!
I am still not too optimistic for Joyn, but can see some potential for Joyn
I think your help is needed…
… also in your interest
Web technologies leave carrier approaches towards services behind
Fit-for-purpose applications create real value, every operator needs new revenues
Empty promises must not convince any longer, eventually they are going to be questioned!
Creating values beyond the service Joyn is something you want to do, too! Expose your platforms, incl. Joyn
October 2014, Berlin, GermanySebastian Schumann: “Deployment options with hosted RCS”, 7th annual Rich Communication 17
service platform (get a good partner)
vendors, operators, GSMA, executives, colleagues
Less ubiquitous, but more targeted applications will replacegeneral purpose legacy-concept communications use case by use case!
THANK YOU.Sebastian Schumann
Application & Platform Innovation | Slovak Telekom, a.s.
@s_schumann
+421 903 419 345
ATTRIBUTION
Jibe Mobile, Inc. jibe is a registered trademark. The jibe mobile logo is owned by Jibe Mobile, Inc.
Joyn and the Joyn logo are a trademark of the GSMA.
Past designed by Megan Sheehan from the Noun Project
Forward designed by Austin Condiff from the Noun Project
Swiss Army Knife designed by Olivier Guin from the Noun Project
Knife designed by Gregory Sujkowskifrom the Noun Project
Knife designed by Gregory Sujkowski from the Noun Project
Knife designed by Antony Bayo from the Noun Project
Knife designed by Erik Wagner from the Noun Project
Scalpel designed by Danny Sturgess from the Noun Project
Tools designed by jessie_vp from the Noun Project
Saw designed by Arthur Shlain from the Noun Project
Drill designed by Alexandr Cherkinsky from the Noun Project
Flash designed byGeorg Habermann from the Noun Project
Life Saver designed by Percy Batalier from the Noun Project
The Twitter handle s_schumann is my personal one. On Twitter, you will discuss with me and face my opinions, not my employers!
19