DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
description
Transcript of DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT
Presentation to Ad-hoc Task Force Presentation to Ad-hoc Task Force
at 11 am on 21.3.2012 IIFT, New Delhi.at 11 am on 21.3.2012 IIFT, New Delhi.
1
SECTION 1 Brief description and
background of Department of Rural DevelopmentSECTION 2 RFD of the Department for the
year 2011-12 – experiences and lessons learnt. What worked and
what did not ?
SECTION 3 Overview of the strategy and strategic plan of the department.
SECTION 4 Status of relevant discussions with Planning Commission
(including with Working Groups)
SECTION 5 RFD of the Departmentfor the year 2012-13
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
2
SECTION 1
Brief description and background of Department of Rural Development
3
Our Vision
Sustainable and inclusive growth of rural India
Our MissionSustainable and inclusive growth of rural India through a multi-pronged strategy for eradication of poverty by increasing livelihood opportunities, providing social safety net and developing infrastructure for socio-economic growth and improvement of quality of life in rural India
4
Programmes of Rural Development…
…aim at Universal Coverage
…are Demand Driven
…are aimed at increasing sustainability
…have built in Transparency and Accountability
…follow Participatory Approach
…aim at Empowerment of the Poor
5
PROGRAMMES
LIVELIHOODS:• Enhancing and improving livelihood security by providing
minimum 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in every financial year to every household. (MGNREGA)
• Providing livelihood opportunities to BPL households.(SGSY/NRLM)
INFRASTRUCTURE:• All-weather rural connectivity to unconnected rural habitations
and up gradation of existing roads.(PMGSY)• Providing basic housing and homestead to BPL households.
(IAY)• Providing urban amenities in rapidly urbanizing rural areas and
improve the quality of life.(PURA)
SOCIAL SECURITY:• Providing Social assistance to the elderly, widow and disabled
persons.(NSAP)
6
SGSY/NRLM/ DRDA
Div.
MGNREGA Div.
SECRETARY (RURAL DEVELOPMENT) SHRI S. Vijay Kumar
1. RH Div. 2. NSAP Div. 3. OL Div.
1. ADMIN. Div. 2. RFD/Sevottam3. International
Coop. Div.4. PC Div. 5. IEC Div.6. GC/TRG/Parl. Div7. IT Div.
1. RC Div.2. Vig. Div.3. DG, NRRDA
1. MON. Div. 2.NLM 3.V& MC
1. MON./EVALUATION 2. NE Div. 3. P&P Div.
Minister of Rural Development Shri Jairam
Ramesh
Chief Economic
Adviser
Joint Secretary
(RL) (Rural
Livelihoods)
Joint Secretary (SA) (Social
Assistance)
Joint Secretary
(RE-I) (Rural
Employment)
Adviser (Statistics)
Joint Secretary
(RC) & CVO (Rural
Connectivity)
MOS(RD-SA) Shri Sisir
Adhikari
MOS(RD-PJ) Shri Pradeep
Jain
MOS(RD-AS) Ms. Agatha
Sangma
AS & FA
Chief Controller of Accounts
Finance/Budget Divisions of
DRD/DLR & Min. of PR & Min.
of DWS
Joint Secretary (A & C)
(Administration & Coordination)
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
MGNREGA/PURA Div.
Joint Secretary
(RE-II) (Rural
Employment)
Economic Adviser
7
RESPONSIBILITY CENTRES
8
Department of Rural Development- Formulates policies and programmes - Releases funds
State Governments- Facilitates implementation- Monitors Programmes
District Administration- Prepares district perspective plans- Implements the programmes
Panchayati Raj Institutions- Plans at the grass root level- Selects works/beneficiaries and implements
Implementation Mechanism
INDIA• 35 States/UTs
• 625 Districts
• 6484 Blocks
• 2.5 lakh Village Panchayats
• 15 lakh Rural Habitations
9
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005
10
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005
An Act to provide for the enhancement
of livelihood security of the households in rural areas of the country by providing at least
100 days of legally guaranteed wage employment in
every financial year to every household
whose adults volunteer to do unskilled manual work
11
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA)
Primary:Supplement employment opportunities in rural areas
Auxiliary: Create sustainable livelihoods through regeneration of natural resource base – land, water, forests (“Green Jobs”)
Process outcomes: Strengthen grass root democratic processes
12
Impact of MGNREGA
Employment provided to Employment provided to 41m Households 41m Households (upto Jan. 12) (upto Jan. 12) Increase in Wage IncomeIncrease in Wage IncomeReduction in Distress MigrationReduction in Distress MigrationEnhanced Food SecurityEnhanced Food Security
Higher Land Productivity Higher Land Productivity Increase in Wage RatesIncrease in Wage RatesEqual Wages for Men and WomenEqual Wages for Men and WomenImprovement in Wage Negotiation PowerImprovement in Wage Negotiation Power
Financial Inclusion, 100Financial Inclusion, 100 million million institutional accountsinstitutional accountsInsurance of Wage EarnersInsurance of Wage Earners Major Safety NetMajor Safety NetAnnual Budget Annual Budget Rs 31000 croresRs 31000 crores
13
Supplementing Employment Opportunities
2009-102010-11 2011-12
(till Jan., 12)
Employment Provided
5.26 crore households
5.49 crore households
4.10 crores households
Persondays Generated
Rs. 283.59 croreRs. 257.15 crore Rs. 140.29
crores
Women 48% Women 49% Women 49%
Persondays per household
54 days 47 days 34 days
Average wage per personday
Rs. 90 Rs. 100 Rs.117
Earning per household per year (average)
Rs. 4860 Rs. 4700 Rs. 3978
Total Expenditure
Rs. 37905.23 cr Rs. 35377.27 cr Rs. 26800 cr.
Works taken up
46.17 lakh 50.99 lakh 66.06 lakh 14
NRLM (Aajeevika)
15
Promoting sustainable livelihoods SGSY now restructured as National Rural Livelihood Mission
(Aajeevika)
16
Enhancing Sustainable LivelihoodsSwaranjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) now restructured as National Rural Livelihood Mission
(Aajeevika) Key Features•Social Mobilisation and Institution Building•Financial Inclusion•Livelihoods promotion•Social Development•Convergence
17
•Support to primary level federations•Linkage with departments•Auditing of groups•Anchoring community cadre
•Training to SHGs•Financial and Livelihood Services•Access to public services and entitlements
•Savings•Internal Lending•Accessing Credit from Banks
Secondary Level Federations
Primary level federation - 10-20
SHGs (relaxation in difficult areas)
SHGs one member from each household, preferably a
woman, organized into a
S.H.G. To cover 7crore rural
poor households
Social Mobilization and Institution BuildingInstitutional Architecture
18
• Access to credit is key to come out of poverty
• Out of Rs.100,000 per family required, around 90% has to come from financial institutions.
• Strategic partnerships with banking sector, NABARD and co-operative banks.
• Promoting financial intermediation by mature S.H.G federations
• Interest subsidy on loans to S.H.Gs
• Micro insurance to cover life, health and assets
Financial Inclusion
19
• Coping with vulnerabilities – debt bondage, food insecurity, migration, health shocks
• Strengthening existing livelihoods – agriculture, livestock, forestry and non-timber forest produce
Livelihoods Enhancement
20
Self employment - Entrepreneurship development among local youth to generate in-situ employment. Targeting 60 lakhs micro-entrepreneurs by 2017
Skilled wage employment - opportunities for youth in growing sectors of the economy – targeting 1.0 crore youth by 2017
Livelihoods Enhancement (contd…)
21
Empowerment
22
Outcomes of SGSY/Ajeevika (since inception)(as on Jan., 2012)
Investment on SGSY/Ajeevika : Rs. 44420 crore on both credit and subsidy
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Assisted Assisted SHGs Formed Beneficiaries Women
Series1
(42.87 Lakhs)(4.29 million)
174.79 lakhs(17.48 million)
(105.91 lakhs(10.59 million)
23
Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY)
24
Rural Connectivity Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY)
Provision of all-weather road connectivity to all the eligible habitations in core network with population of 500 persons or more in plain areas and 250 persons or more for Hill States, Tribal (Schedule-V), Desert Areas (identified in DDP) and 78 selected Tribal and Backward districts under Integrated Action Plan (IAP). Upgradation of selected eligible roads though it is not central to the programme.100% financing by Central Govt.Maintenance by States.Quality assurance mechanism.
25
National Highways2%
State Highwaysand Major District
Roads14%
Rural Roads84%
•Total length of road network in India : 32 Lakh km
•National Highways: 65,600 Km (2%)
•State Highways &
Major District Roads : 4,32,000 Km (14%)
•Rural Roads : 27 Lakh Km (84%)
•80 % of Rural Roads unsurfaced
•3.42 Lakh habitations (39%) out of 8.88 Lakh rural habitations lacked all-weather connectivity in the year 2000.
Status of Road Network in India
26
PMGSY - Current Implementation Status
Activity Total EligibleProjects
SanctionedCompleted upto Jan. 2012
Habitations (in Nos.)
Net 1,58,8491,14,433
(72%)
82,019Eligible (52.%)
Sanctioned (72%)
New Connectivity (km.)
3,65,094 2,55,835(70%)
2,04,285Eligible (56.%)
Sanctioned (80%)
Upgradation(km.)
3,68,0001,63,991
(45%)
1,36,972Eligible (37.22%)Sanctioned (84%)
B- Financial Progress
Value of project cleared
Funds Released
Expenditure
Rs. 1,26,657 Cr. Rs.96,952 Cr. (77%)
Rs.88,931Cr.(92 %)
A. Physical Progress
27
Transforming Rural Lives
Increased access to market, health and education Investment of One Million Rupees enables 165 poor people to move above poverty line
Source : IFPRI, Research Report 110, 1999 28
Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)
29
Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)
Financial assistance is provided to rural BPL houseless households• Unit assistance Revised w.e.f. 1.4.2010- Rs. 45,000 for new construction in plain areas- Rs. 48,500 for new construction in hilly areas and IAP Districts and 78 LWE affected districts.-In addition, Rs. 20,000 available as credit under DRI at interest of 4% per annum.• Allocation to States/Districts -to States on the basis of 75:25 weightage to housing shortage and poverty ratio respectively.-To districts on the basis of 75:25 weightage to housing shortage and rural SC/ST population respectively.
30
Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)
• Earmarking of Funds-Sanctions in the name of women or jointly.-60% funds for SC/STs.-15% for minorities.-3% for persons with disability.• Selection of Beneficiary- From Permanent IAY Waitlist based on BPL list of 2002.- There are separate lists for SC/ST & others.- Lists are displayed publicly.
31
National Social Assistance Programmes (NSAP)
32
National Social Assistance Programmes (NSAP)
NSAP at present consists of the following schemes exclusively for Below Poverty Line (BPL) persons/households:
- Pension schemes for Old, Widow and Disabled
-National Family Benefit Scheme (NFBS) for households on the death of the primary breadwinner.
33
Pension Schemes under NSAP
Old age pension under Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS)
- All BPL persons of 60 years or higher - 196.96 lakh persons have been benefitted so far.
Widow Pension under Indira Gandhi National Widow Pension Scheme (IGNWPS)
- All BPL widows of 40-59 years- 36.11 lakh widows have been benefitted so far
Disability Pension under Indira Gandhi National Disability Pension Scheme(IGNDPS) - All BPL persons with severe/ multiple disability of 18-59
years- 7.70 lakh disabled persons have been benefitted.
Budget to be enhanced from Rs 6158 Cr in 2011-12 toRs 9434.76. Cr (projected requirement) in 2012-13 34
SECTION 2: RFD 2011-12 :- Experience and Lessons learnt, What worked and What
did not ?• Third RFD of the Department.• Total 10 Objectives (including 3 mandatory objectives were taken up with 46
Actions to be attained through 74 Success Indicators. • Overall achievements – 90% + expected
MGNREGA• Experience and Lessons learnt, what worked:- The indicator % of rural households provided employment against demand in the RFD is
the appropriate success indicator of the programme.• What did not work:- Persondays generated and fund utilised were fixed as success indicators. However,
MGNREGA is a demand driven programme and the pesondays generated and fund utilised do not reflect the success of the programme. The programme by providing employment guarantee to the rural households has led to increase in wages in agriculture and other sectors and consequently household incomes. The demand for MGNREGA work is also closely linked to good monsoons and availability of other employment options. Therefore these indicators were not appropriate and have been removed. Other outcome indicators have been added.
35
Contd…
SGSY (NRLM)• What worked? The efforts of the Ministry in providing continuous technical assistance to the
states in setting up of the State missions, and, preparation of their annual action plans.
• What did not work? The proposition that all S.H.Gs to be supported under credit cum subsidy component should pursue common economic activity. This has now been changed to ’promoting diversified livelihoods of individual members’. The group becomes a solidarity unit and not a ‘common production unit’.
• What worked, but was not part of the RFD last year? Large scale proof of concept for sustainable and viable livelihoods of the poor
around key sectors – agriculture. This is being reflected in the RFD of 2012-13. We are also increasing the sectors to include – forest produce, livestock and fisheries
36
Contd...
PMGSY What worked and what did not• “Number of Inspections” as an indicator did not work, since
the objective is to improve quality, therefore a new indicator, “percentage of ongoing/completed roads graded satisfactory” being taken for 2012-13.
• Instead of “length of roads constructed ” a better indicator of “Number of habitations connected” being taken for 2012-13.
37
Contd...
IAYExperiences & Lessons learnt
• States/Implementing Agencies need to be taken on board for the success of Results-Framework Document because actual execution of the programmes is in their hands.
What Worked– The agreed objectives, success indicators and the target to
measure progress clearly indicated in RFD have made it easier to understand how to effectively implement and monitor the scheme.
What did not work– Non-inclusion of Management Information System (MIS) to
monitor the programmes to have comprehensive data input about programme implementation.
38
Contd...
PURA Experience and Lessons learnt, what worked and What not ?
• Since PURA is being tried out on pilot basis, proper assessment of the time needed to complete the processes involved could not be done. This rendered the timelines unrealistic.
NSAP – Experiences & Lessons learnt • Key improvement – better coverage of eligible beneficiaries.
39
Section 3: Overview of the Strategy and Strategic
Plan of the DepartmentMGNREGA• Focusing on labour intensive land development works on community
lands and land belonging to marginalized sections.• Use of ICT to improve delivery of services and enhance transparency and
accountability.
SGSY (NRLM)• Emphasis on setting up of dedicated state missions, staffed with quality
human resources, continuous capacity building of the missions and state developing their own poverty reduction action plans.
• Phasing strategy to ensure capacities are built at all levels and scaling up happens in a seamless organic manner
• Establishing large scale proof of concepts in all critical components, to draw lessons for scaling up – resource blocks, primary sector livelihoods, financial inclusion pilots, self employment pilots, social inclusion pilots, etc. 40
Contd…
41
Contd…
IAY•Ensure adequate and affordable housing for all and facilitate development of sustainable and inclusive habitats in rural areas by expanding Government support, promoting community participation, self-help and public-private partnership within the framework of Panchayati Raj.•Provide access to land, finance, basic amenities and technical support for the construction of the houses.•Creation of web based knowledge network of appropriate technology for specific region/areas of the country for IAY houses with an aim to create a knowledge repository.•Set up Resources Centres at Centre for handling technical, financial & research needs for Rural Housing Habitats and set up similar Centres at States.
42
Contd…
PURA• PPP mode to achieve efficient implementation of Rural
Infrastructure projects and high standards of service delivery.• Convergence of several schemes and simultaneous
implementation in a project mode.
NSAP• To build a database of beneficiaries with Unique ID number• Open accounts in Banks for all beneficiaries as far as possible.• Disbursement of benefits under NSAP through transaction
based NSAP-MIS.
43
Section 4Discussion with Planning Commission
(including Working Groups) MGNREGA-The working group has recommended strengthening the institutional arrangement at all levels for better implementation of MGNREGA. This includes cluster level teams in high expenditure Blocks. The working group has also accorded priority to capacity building efforts. These recommendations will help in achieving the RFD indicators in 2012-13. -Use of modern technology including ICT for timely disbursement of benefits.
44
SGSY (NRLM)• Emphasis on capacity building of State, district and Sub—district
Mission units. • Placement linked skill development to be a major initiative in 12th
Plan • Sustainable livelihoods initiatives in agriculture, forest produce (non-
timber), livestock, fisheries, etc. • Financial inclusion to be major thrust area for savings and credit• Special initiatives for social inclusion of weaker sections and
vulnerable categories.
45
Contd…
Contd…
PMGSY:• Working Group has recommended striking of balance between maintenance and
creation of assets.• Working Group has recommended more emphasis on providing connectivity to IAP
Districts.• Working Group has recommended intensification of efforts to use marginal/local
materials in road construction.IAY (Rural Housing):• Working Group has recommended enhancement in unit assistance for the construction
of houses . • Provision for capacity building and man-power strengthening to make MIS successful
recommended.• New ways to implement new financial instruments/bankable schemes to be
investigated.• Provision of technical training and technical support to the ground level officials
and beneficiaries respectively.
46
Contd…
PURA The working group has recommended a larger role for the State
Governments in the appraisal and approval of PURA projects and also conversion of the scheme into a centrally sponsored scheme. This will enhance the commitment of the States to the scheme.
The working group has also recommended establishment of adequate institutional arrangement for project implementation. These recommendations will help in achieving the RFD indicators in 2012-13.
NSAP• No working group
47
RFD 2012-13
Inter se priorities among key objectives, success indicators and targets
Table 1- Result-Framework Document (RFD) Table 2- Trend Value for Success Indicators
48
Section 2 Table 1 – Result Framework Document
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 1 15 1.1 % of households provided employment against demanded employment under MGNREGS
% of rural households
2.00 98
1.2 Person days generated under MGNREGS (women)
% of persondays (women) generated
2.00 33
49
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 1 15 1.3 Approval of State Labour Budget for 2012-13
Approval of Labour budget of States
2.00 28
1.4 Review by Central Employment Guarantee Council
No. of meetings held
2.00 2
1.5 Regional Review meetings in 6 Regions.
No. of meetings 1.00 12
1.6 Monitoring of MGNREGA process and quality of works
No. of district for NLM visit
1.00 100
50
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 1 15 1.7 MIS reporting of expenditure
% of expenditure reported on MIS
2.00 90
1.8 Capacity building for enhancing effectiveness of Gram Sabha
No. of Gram Panchayat for training
1.00 100
1.9 Pilot e-FMS solution in States
Number of States initiated e-FMS
1.00 6
1.10 Pilot social audit in States
Number of States piloted social audit.
1.00 20
51
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 2 15 2.1 State Missions for NRLM Implementation
Number of new State missions set up
1.00 7
2.2 District Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM Implementation
No. of new District Programme Management Unit Set up
1.00 58
2.3 Block Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM implementation
No. of new Block Programme Management Unit Set up
1.00 144
2.4 Formation of Self Help Groups (SHGs)
No. of SHGs formed (in lakhs)
2.00 2.88
52
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 2 15 2.5 Capacity Building and Training of beneficiaries
Number beneficiaries provided training (in lakhs)
2.00 5.47
2.6 Provision of economic support (credit and Subsidy) to SHGs for livelihood promotion
Number of SHGs assisted (in lakhs)
2.00 1.74
2.7 Promoting Sustainable Livelihoods- large sized proof of concepts
No of key livelihood sectors where proof of concepts has been established
1.00 2
53
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 2 15 2.8 Sustainable livelihoods Pilots - families benefited
No of beneficiaries intervened by livelihood interventions (in lakhs)
2.00 9.60
2.9 Sanction of Placement linked skill development projects through private sector participation
Number of beneficiaries trained and placed (in lakhs)
2.00 3.84
2.10 Number of micro enterprises created through RSETI and partnership organisations
Number of beneficiaries trained (in lakhs)
1.00 0.96
54
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 3 15 3.1 Habitations – Habitations to be connected
Connection of habitations
4.00 4,000
3.2 Satisfactory Quality of roads under construction.
% of “satisfactory grading”
2.00 70
3.3 Satisfactory Quality of roads completed.
% of “satisfactory grading”
2.00 75
3.4 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. road length sanctioned.
% of data entry on OMMAS
1.00 90
55
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 3 15 3.5 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. value of projects sanctioned
% of data entry on OMMAS
1.00 90
3.6 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. habitations sanctioned
% of data entry on OMMAS
1.00 90
3.7 Maintenance Funds credited
Funds credited (%) 1.00 80
3.8 Maintenance Funds expenditure
Expenditure (% of deposit)
1.00 60
3.9 Regional Review Meetings
No. of review meetings
1.00 12
3.10 Improving the capacity of NRRDA
Implementation of McKinsey Report
1.00 9
56
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 4 15 4.1 Develop MIS architecture
Active convergence with States
3.00 18
4.2 Fulfilment of physical target for the year
Construction of houses
6.00 17.30
4.3 Focus on weaker sections
No. of houses (in lakhs)
3.00 10.38
4.4 Monitoring of performance of States
Effective Monitoring by way of monthly meetings of coordinating offices, quarterly meetings of Secretaries and annual meetings of PDs, DRDAs etc.
3.00 10
57
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 5 10 5.1 Scrutiny of proposals for release of funds
Release of funds to the States (in lakhs)
2.00 9434.76
5.2 Identification of eligible beneficiaries for Pension Schemes for the aged, widows and the disabled
Coverage of beneficiaries vis-à-vis the estimated number (in lakhs)
3.00 315
5.3 Identification of eligible households for assistance under NFBS.
Coverage of eligible households vis-à-vis the estimated numbers (in lakhs)
3.00 3.43
58
Contd….
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 5 10 5.4 Placing the database of pensioners in the public domain under MIS
Uploading of pensisoners database vis-à-vis the physical coverage (in lakhs)
2.00 170
Objective 6 5 6.1 Rolling out of remaining 7 pilot projects of PURA
Approval of DPRs and release of funds to DRDAs
0.5 31.10.12
6.2 Execution of State support agreement and concession agreement
Signing of Agreements
0.5 30.11.12
59
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 6 5 6.3 Commencement of activities
Inventorisation of assets, procurement of land, release of grant instalment, financial closure and dissemination of project documents
0.5 31.12.12
6.4 Selected private developers to provide urban amenities in PURA clusters, drinking water and sewage treatment, construction of village streets, drainage, solid waste management, skill development of rural BPL youths etc.
Approval of DPRs and release of funds to DRDAs
0.5 31.10.12
60
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 6 5 6.5 Revision of PURA guidelines based on learning so far in the pilot phase
Incorporating modifications in consultations with connected Ministries for effective implementation
0.5 31.12.15
6.6 Calling for Expression of Interest (EOI) for the next set of pilot projects
After revising the guidelines, finalization and advertising of EOI document.
0.5 31.10.12
6.7 Evaluation of EOIs and short listing to select capable Private developers
Scrutiny of EOIs received and shortlisting
1.00 30.9.12
61
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 6 5 6.8 Calling for Request for proposals (RFP) from short listed private developers
Finalization of RFP document and its publication in newspapers
1.00 30.11.12
Objective 7 5 7.1 Improving service delivery of NIRD
Implementation of recommendation of Committee
2.00 30.11.12
7.2 Organisation of Training Courses
Number of Trainings conducted
2.00 23,000
7.3 Organisation of five national Colloquia of SIRDs and ETCs
April, 12, June, 12, August 12, Nov., 12 and Jan., 13
1.00 5
62
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators
Weight Target Value (100%)
Objective 8 5 8.1 Finalization / Preparation of final reform proposal
Preparation of Detailed target oriented action plan for implementation
3.00 April, 12
8.2 Implementation of Action Plan
Engaging Implementation agent
2.00 June, 12
63
Section 3 Table 2 – Trend value for Success Indicators
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 1 15 1.1 % of households provided employment against demanded employment under MGNREGS
% 99 99 99
1.2 Person days generated under MGNREGS (women)
% 48 49 33
64
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 1 15 1.3 Approval of State Labour Budget for 2012-13
Nos. 28 28 28
1.4 Review by Central Employment Guarantee Council
Nos. 3 2 3
1.5 Regional Review meetings in 6 Regions.
Nos. 2 1 12
65
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 1 15 1.6 Monitoring of MGNREGA process and quality of works
Nos. - - 100
1.7 MIS reporting of expenditure
% - 85 90
1.8 Capacity building for enhancing effectriveness of Gram Sabha
Nos. of GP
- - 100
66
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 1 15 1.9 Pilot e-FMS solution in States
Nos. - - 6
1.10 Pilot social audit in States
Nos. - - 5
Objective 2 15 2.1 State Missions for NRLM Implementation
Number of new State missions set up
- 20 8
67
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 2 15 2.2 District Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM Implementation
No. of new District Programme Management Unit Set up
- - 60
2.3 Block Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM implementation
No. of new Block Programme Management Unit Set up
- - 150
2.4 Formation of Self Help Groups (SHGs)
No. of SHGs formed (in lakhs)
2.85 3.00 3.00
68
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 2 15 2.5 Capacity Building and Training of beneficiaries
Number beneficiaries provided training (in lakhs)
27.45 19.00 5.70
2.6 Provision of economic support (credit and Subsidy) to SHGs for livelihood promotion
Number of SHGs assisted (in lakhs)
3.86 2.00 1.78
2.7 Promoting Sustainable Livelihoods- large sized proof of concepts
No of key livelihood sectors where proof of concepts has been established
- - 3.00
69
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 2 15 2.8 Sustainable livelihoods Pilots - families benefited
No of beneficiaries intervened by livelihood interventions (in lakhs)
- - 10.00
2.9 Sanction of Placement linked skill development projects through private sector participation
Number of beneficiaries trained and placed (in lakhs)
0.85 3.75 4.00
2.10 Number of micro enterprises created through RSETI and partnership organisations
Number of beneficiaries trained (in lakhs)
- - 1.00
70
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 3 15 3.1 Habitations – Habitations to be connected
Nos 7584 4000 4000
3.2 Satisfactory Quality of roads under construction.
% of “satisfactory grading”
- - 70
3.3 Satisfactory Quality of roads completed.
% of “satisfactory grading”
- - 75
71
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 3 15 3.4 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. road length sanctioned.
% of data entry on OMMAS
70 80 80
3.5 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. value of projects sanctioned
% of data entry on OMMAS
- 60 80
72
Contd….
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 3 15 3.6 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. habitations sanctioned
% of data entry on OMMAS
- - 80
3.7 Maintenance Funds credited
Funds credited (%)
- - 70
3.8 Maintenance Funds expenditure
Expenditure (% of deposit)
- - 50
73
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 3 15 3.9 Regional Review Meetings
No. of review meetings
- - 12
3.10 Improving the capacity of NRRDA
Implementation of McKinsey Report
- - 9
74
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 4 15 4.1 Develop MIS architecture
No. of States
- - 18
4.2 Fulfilment of physical target for the year
Nos. of houses (In lakhs)
29.09 27.26 17.30
4.3 Focus on weaker sections
-do- 17.45 16.87 10.38
4.4 Monitoring of performance of States
No. of meetings
10 10 10
75
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 5 10 5.1 Scrutiny of proposals for release of funds
Rs. in crores
5110 6658 9434.76
5.2 Identification of eligible beneficiaries for Pension Schemes for the aged, widows and the disabled
No. in lakhs
215 226 315
76
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 5 10 5.3 Identification of eligible households for assistance under NFBS.
No. in lakhs
2.05 3.43 3.43
5.4 Placing the database of pensioners in the public domain under MIS.
No. in lakhs
164 170 170
77
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 6 5 6.1 Rolling out of remaining 7 pilot projects of PURA
Time period
- - 31.10.12
6.2 Execution of State support agreement and concession agreement
- - 30.11.12
78
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 6 5 6.3 Commencement of activities
Time period
- - 31.12.12
6.4 Selected private developers to provide urban amenities in PURA clusters, drinking water and sewage treatment, construction of village streets, drainage, solid waste management, skill development of rural BPL youths etc.
- - -
79
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 6 6 6.5 Revision of PURA guidelines based on learning so far in the pilot phase
Time period
- - 31.5.12
6.6 Calling for Expression of Interest (EOI) for the next set of pilot projects
- - 31.7.12
80
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 6 6.7 Evaluation of EOIs and short listing to select capable Private developers
Time period
- - 30.9.12
6.8 Calling for Request for proposals (RFP) from short listed private developers
- - 30.11.12
81
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 7 5 7.1 Improving service delivery of NIRD
Time period
- - 30.11.12
7.2 Organisation of Training Courses
Nos. 41030 13144 23000
7.3 Organisation of five national Colloquia of SIRDs and ETCs
Nos. 2 5 5
82
Contd….
Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11
Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)
Target value for 12-13
Objective 8 5 8.1 Finalization / Preparation of final reform proposal
Time period
- - April, 12
8.2 Implementation of Action Plan
Nos. June, 2012
83
Description of Success indicators and measurement methodology
Schemes of DoRD are Centrally Sponsored Schemes that are implemented through:-
(i) State Governments (ii) Autonomous societies under State Governments(iii) District Rural Development Agencies (DRDAs).
Role of Union Government (DoRD):(i) Issue guidelines of schemes/ programmes.(ii) Provide financial assistance.(iii) Periodically monitor progress of the secheme.(iv)Evaluate the impact of the schemes.
The various success indicators have been prescribed accordingly.
84
Description of Success indicators and measurement methodology
MGNREGAI. Wage income provided per household.II. Coverage of marginalized groups
• Percentage of SC participation.• Percentage of ST participation• Percentage of women participation.
SGSY: 1. No. of new District Programme Management Unit Set up
2. No. of new Block Programme Management Unit Set up3. No. of SHGs formed4. No. of beneficiaries provided training 5. No. of SHGs assisted6. No of key livelihood sectors where proof of concepts has been
established7. No of beneficiaries intervened by livelihood interventions8. Number of beneficiaries trained and placed9. Number of beneficiaries trained and placed
10. No. of beneficiaries trained85
Description of Success indicators and measurement methodology
PMGSY(i) Financial support provided to State Governments to
construct rural roads.(ii) State Governments responsible to execute projects(iii) Projects of State Governments sanctioned by Ministry after examining their DPRs. (iv) Progress periodically reviewed through reports review meetings, field visits etc.(v) Success indicators are:-(a) Length of new roads(b) Amount of fund released.(c) Inspections done by National/State Quality Monitors.
86
Description of Success indicators and measurement methodology
Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)
I. This Centrally Sponsored Scheme is implemented :(i) By DRDAs at District Level(ii) By PRIs at Gram Panchayat level.II. Central Government releases funds and monitor
progressIII. Release of funds dependent on submission of complete proposals by DRDAs for 2nd Installment.IV. Success indicators are:-(i) Amount of funds released.(ii) Number of Houses sanctioned and constructed
87
Description of Success indicators and measurement methodology
PURA
(i) Success indicators for 2012-13:-
Achievement of performance standards incorporated in the Concession Agreement – as certified by the
Independent Engineer.
National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP)
I. All Schemes of NSAP are for poverty alleviation.II. Funds to be released and number of beneficiaries
generally specified.III. Process of identification of eligible beneficiaries under IGNWPS and IGNDPS underway.IV. Monitoring done through review meetings indicated
under various schemes.
88
Specific performance requirement from other Departments
1. State Government/UTs must submit complete proposals well in time. 2. Support of M/o Finance and Planning Commission
required for budget outlays.MGNREGA:-
(i) Demands of PRIs to be projected timely. (ii) Mechanism of convergence of various programmes
should be positively exploited.SGSY/NRLM
• State Government/UTs must submit complete proposals well in time.
• Support of M/o Finance and Planning Commission required for budget outlays.
• Support of Public Sector Banks required under SGSY/NRLM for provision of credit for SHG members and federations.
89
Specific performance requirement from other Departments
PMGSY:-(i) State agencies must implement programmes meticulously.(ii) Timely provision of budgets and mobilization of assistance
from external agencies to be done meticulously. IAY :-
(i) State/ UTs must submit timely proposal for release of funds.(ii) They must timely release funds to beneficiaries and assist
them logistically. (iii) Agencies to monitor constructions of houses in stipulated
time.(iv) Public Sector Banks to provide loan to beneficiaries under
Differential Rate of Interest (DRI) Scheme with minimal required documentation.
PURA:-(i) Signing of State support Agreement for PURA(ii) Sponsoring the PURA proposals for Public-Private Partnership
with private parties; signing of Concession Agreement for PURA.
90
Outcome/Impact of the Ministry/DepartmentSection 6 : Outcome/Impact of Department/Ministry
Outcome /Impact of Department /Ministry
Jointly responsible for influencing this outcome/impact with the following organization(s)/departments/ministries
Success Indicator Unit 2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
Enhance livelihood security of households in rural areas
State Governments, Ministry of Finance, Planning Commission
1.1 Credit mobilised for women SHGs1.2 Total Wage Expenditure1.3 Wage Income per household
Rs. In crore
-do-
Rs.
12622
25579
4865
-
25686
4675
-
16368
3996
-
-
-
-
-
-Improved all-weather rural road connectivity
-do- 2.1 Length of rural roads constructed in Kms.
Number 45,109 29,700 24,400 27,000 32,000
2.2 Length of rural roads upgraded in Kms.
Enhanced basic housing to BPL households in rural areas
-do- Increase in coverage of rural households
% 93.36 47.25 90 90 90
Improved social assistance to the elderly, widow and disabled persons
-do- Increase in beneficiaries
% 105% (215)
100% (226)
100%(315)
100% (315)
100% (315)
91
92