DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL …Nov DCI'c Jan Feb MalC' AplC' May Jun If you have...
64
\1';' V , ,.. .... 1 Aug ., DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Sep Oct -; CRIMINAL JUSTICE / AGENCY PROCESSING STATISTICS FY 1986 VS FY 1985 OffiCE 0 f THE SECRETARY OffiCE Of RESEARCH AND STATISTICS Nov DCI'c Jan Feb MalC' AplC' May Jun If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov.
Transcript of DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL …Nov DCI'c Jan Feb MalC' AplC' May Jun If you have...
~ ~ ~.' \1';' V
, ,.. .... 1 Aug
.,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
Sep Oct
-;
CRIMINAL JUSTICE /
AGENCY PROCESSING STATISTICS
FY 1986 VS
FY 1985
OffiCE 0 f THE SECRETARY OffiCE Of RESEARCH AND STATISTICS
Nov DCI'c Jan Feb MalC' AplC' May Jun
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov.
-~
STATE OF MARYLAND
WILLIAM DONALD SCHAEFER, GOVERNOR
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
Bishop L. Robinson Secretary
Richard A. Tamberrino Chief, Planning and Research
'Prepared by
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND STATISTICS
Robert W. Gibson, Jr., Director
6776 Reisterstown Road, Suite 310 Baltimore, Maryland 21215-2341
301-764-4021
~
~
('~
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCY PROCESSING STATISTICS
INTRODUCTION
IN AN EFFORT TO ASSIST DECISION MAKERS. THE OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND STATISTICS DEVELOPED THIS DOCUMENT TO PROVIDE A SYNOPSIS or THE TRENDS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESSING STATISTICS WHICH HAVE OCCURRED OVER THE MOST RECENT FISCA~ YEARS_ AN EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO CAPTURE ON A MONTHLY BASIS STATISTICAL DATA WHICH PROVIDES SOME INDICATORS AS TO THE CHANGES IN OFFENSE AND ARREST PATTERNS. LOCAL JAIL POPULATIONS. PAROLE AND PROBATION CASELOADS. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONoPOPULATIONS AND PAROLING AUTHORITY ACTIVITIES. IN EACH SECTION OF THE REPORT A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DATA SOURCES AND RECENT TRENDS IS PRESENTED. ~HIS REPORT ACTS AS A REPRESENTATION OF THE EVENTS WHICH HAVE OCCURRED OVER THE PAST TWO FISCAL YEARS. CAUSE-EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS CANNOT BE DRAWN FROM THE YARIOVS DATA PRESENTED. HOWEVER. RELATIONSHIPS IN TRENDS CAN AID USERS OF THIS DOCUMENT IN OBTAINING AN INDICATION OF POSSIBLE FUTURE TRENDS.
U.S. Department of Justice Nationallnstitule of Justice
106333
'f .,~ , .
~l N(l'3RS
This documenl has been reproduced exactly as receIVed from Ihe person or organization Originating it Points of view or opinIOns stated In this document are those of the authom and do not necessanly represenl Ihe offiCial posillon or pOlicies of Ihe Nallonal InSlitule of Justice
"\.~'-~
{1 {/t
L..r
• 1.).\1~ 12: ~
~e:.<m\lDllg)Il1f\\t0~§
Permission 10 reproduce Ihis copynghted malenal has been granled by
Maryland Department of Public Safety 'and CorrectionalServices~--
- _. -- .. _---
10 Ihe National Cnminal Justice Aeference SelVlce (NCJAS).
Further reproduction au 151 de of Ihe NCJAS syslem requires permission ollhe copynghl owner
OFFENSES AND ARRESTS
LOCAL JAIL STATISTICS
TABLE or CONTENTS
PAROLE AND PROBATION STATISTICS
DIVISION or CORRECTION STATISTICS
PAROLE COMMISSION STATISTICS
PATUXENT INSTITUTION STATISTICS
PAGE
&
8
13
&8
SO
60
)06333 .l
\
OFFENSES AND ARRESTS
Data Sources
The information contained in the offenses and arrests section of the Agency Processing Statistics is based.upon data tabulated through the State-wide Uniform Crime Reporting program managed by the Maryland state Police Criminal Records Central Repository (CRCR). Each month. summary d~ta on offenses and arrests Is compiled and submitted to CRCR by each of Maryland's 134 law enforcement agencies. These reports are edited and prepared for data entry. Computer generated output reports are produced to summerize the information received in a variety of formats. CRCR then provides monthly summaries of the offense and arrest data to the Offi,ce of Research and Sta ti s ti cr,'._
Comparisons ~f data trends occurring between FY 1986 and FY 1985 have been graphically depicted in charts. Index Offenses - Total. Property and Violent are displayed (page 3) as well as 4 cbmparison of Total Offenses [reported) and Adult Arrests (page 4J. Data associated with these graphs is p~ovlded in tables for each fiscal year (pages 5 and 6). A quarterly comparison of the changes in reported index offenses over these two fiscal years is also provided (page 7).
Recent Trend~
Total offenses were up 6.0% from 230.351 in FY 1985 to 244.124 in FY 1986. This growth occurred in all index crime_.~-tego'ries. with increases ranging from 0.1% in Aggravated Assault to 27.2% in Motor Vehicle Theft. Combined categories of offense data show that ~iolent offenses (murder. rape. robbery, and aggravated assaultJ increased 2.0% from 36,081 in FY 1985 to 36,780 in FY 1985. Property Offenses (burglary, larceny and motor vehicle theft) increased ~.1% from 194.268 in FY 1985 to 207,344 in FY 1986. See pages 3, 5, 6, and 7.
Adult arrests increased 2.5% from 169.922 in FY 1985 to 174,1a8~in FY 1986. It should b& noted that offense data "iB coll,ected for only index crimes (murder, rape, robbery. aggravated assault, burglary. larceny and motor vehicle theftJ and only when they are reported. Arrest data encompasses not only index crimes but other crimes, generally considered less serious. Offense data and arrest data are. therefore. mutually exclusive and difficult to compare to each other.
Data on juvenll. arrests in tables 5 and 6 show a reversal of the previous declining trend .. The number of juveniles arrested in FY 1986 was 38.866. a 3.6% increase from the 37,519 juveniles arrested in FY 1985.
'"
2
aUl0S
.19909
17009
1.sasra
0
F .13990 F
E
N .1.1090
S
E
S 999S
7999
5999
\\ 3999
.1999
o
INDEX "::. • ..!"ENSES TOTAL. PROPERTY. AND UIOLENT
FY 1.985 AND 1.986
••• ..0. •••••••••••• .... e. ..tAa.... ••••• "C)- •••••••••••••
,~,·.11 •• ".. ?K. ... ~-.. ,.
........ "f. "'0"
" .,' " "
3
,,0 •••••••••••••••••• 0 .................. 0 ••••••••••••••••• 0()
_lK *"' ~lK
~TOTAL OFFENSES 1.985
··o-TOTRL OFFENSES 1986
-lK-PROPERTV OFFENSES .1985
··lK-PROPERTY OFFENSES J.986
~UIOLENT OFFENSES J.985
···-UIOLENT OFFENSES .1986
t !!······,···········:········,·~·· .... , .. ,.1I ••• """" ....... Cilr." ••••• IL&.I~ u .. ·.'W"'I .. c.,..Ir......... ~a ,..tw"'a&'~····= T .- !!!!~ ~!!!!· .. • .. ,,·&&a.·· ... CI..-, .. · .. ··· .. •· .... · .. · .. ···3'.' ...... "" .......... ""
I Jul Aug Sep Oct Nou Dec Jan Feb Ma~ Ap~ May Jun
M 0 NTH S
o F
F
E
N
S
E
S
A H J)
A
R
R
E
S
T
S
24090 I .... "'\,
TOTAL OFFENSES AND ADULT ARRESTS FISCAL YEAR 1.985 AND 1.986
11
22999 ~............ "'" ••• ,0................. . ...... . v , • A- .()o •••• I ", .... ; ........ " I"~ ~ --. . ...
\1' 21i1099
". ,O ••••• •••••••••• .. O •••••••••••••••• ~ .... ·"·"· .. ····O
"" ", " " 1 1.8999
1.6090 t .. .0,'" "Il' II, ........ '" .... ".,' .. , ....
1.4999
1.2999
1.9999
8999
Jul Aug Sep Oct
"q, 111,·1 "'_
I' '.
"0 " .... " " " h •• , ,I' ..... .'
"d
,If It, .,.' "" .,' '.
t,
.0 •••••••••••
Nov Dec Jan Feb
M 0 NTH S
.,,.
~TOTAL OFFENSES 1.985
aOO"TOTAL OFFENSES 1.986
~ADULT ARRESTS 1995
"O"ADULT ARRESTS 1.986
Ma:r Ap:r May Jun
5
OFFENSES AND ARRESTS FISCAL YEAR 1.986
OFFENSES JUL AUG. SEP. OCT. NOU. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. HAY JUNE TOTAL AUERAGE~
MURDER 24 35 35 29 31 39 25 28 33 31 29 32 371 31
RAPE 167 178 171 138 136 132 106 130 134 177 167 181 1817 151
ROBBERY 996 1111 1008 1201 1258 1456 1351 1102 1046 1053 939 1030 13551 1129
AGGRAUATED ASSAULT 2057 2124 1832 1819 1560 1591 1394 1404 1697 1567 1870 2126 21041 1753
VIOLENT OFFENSES 3244 3440 3046 3187 2985 3218 2876 2664 2910 2828 3005 3369 36780 3064
BURGLARY 4762 4954 4644 4736 4645 4769 4465 3975 4578 4232 4623 4342 54725 4560
LARCENY 11837 11691 10229 11257 10721 10358 9361 8916 10823 11583 11138 11532 129446 10787
MOTOR UEHICLE 1769 1949 1850 1867 1911 1923 1976 1918 2056 2029 1967 1958 23173 1931
PROPERTY OFFENSES JS36S 18594 16723 17B60 17277 17050 15802 148Q9 17457 17844 17728 17832 207344 17278
TOTAL OFFENSES 21612 22042 19769 210.o!!7 20262 20268 18678 17473 20367 20672 20733 21201 244124 20342
ARRESTS
ADULT 15045 15614 14348 13893 13741 15313 12866 11983 14362 15173 15800 15990 174128 14511
JUUENILE 3239 3293 3102 3542 3225 2842 2892 2786 3525 3212 3275 3933 38866 3239
TOTAL 18284 18907 17450 17435 16966 18155 15758 14769 17887 18385 19075 19923 212994 17750
*DUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF THE INDIUIDUAL AUERAGES DOESN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AUERAGE.
6
OFFENSES AND ARRESTS FISCAL YEAR 1985
OFFENSES .JUL AUG_ SEP_ OCL NOV_ OEC_ .JAN_ FEB_ HAR_ APR_ HAY .JUNE TOTAL AVERAGEXt
MURDER 27 29 28 41 37 27 24 25 22 30 32 24 346 29
RAPE 153 160 148 149 138 135 112 107 130 140 153 147 1672 139
ROBBERY 960 1071 1017 1148 1227 1385 1240 1041 1114 946 956 9l!9 13054 1088
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 1952 1800 1691 1880 1509 1737 1426 1498 1787 1763 1912 2056 21011 1751
VIOLENT OFFENSES 3092 3060 2884 3218 2911 3284 2802 2671 3053 2879 3053 3176 36083 3007
3URGLARY 4352 4623 4216 4626 4364 4882 4335 4001 4237 3817 4060 4208 51721 4310
LARCENY 10994 11539 9741 11134 10072 10754 9047 8665 10415 10814 10354 10805 124334 10361
MOTOR VEHICLE 1443 1522 1418 1602 1577 1655 1443 1346 1413 1549 1537 1708 182HI 1518
PROPERTY OFFENSES 16789 17684 15:375 17362 1601:3 17291 14825 14012 16065 16180 15951 16721 194268 16189
TOTAL OFFENSES 19881 20744 18259 20580 18924 20575 17627 16683 19118 19059 19004 19897 230351 19196
ARP.ESTS
ADULT 14706 14540 13913 15773 13618 13680 12277 12142 14558 15312 14421 14982 169922 14160
.JUVENILE 3366 3207 3122 3319 3083 2912 2780 2871 3163 2944 3132 3620 37519 3127
TOTAL 18072 17747 170:35 19092 16701 16592 15057 15013 17721 18256 1755:3 18602 207441 17287
*OUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF THE INDIVIDUAL AVERAGES DOESN'T NECESSARILY. EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGE_
7
XNDEX OFFENSES BY QUARTER. FISCAL YEAR 1986 US. 1985. STATE~XDE
CRIME TYPE JULY-SEPTEMBER OCTOBER-DECEMBER JANUARY-MARCH APRIL-JUNE TOTAL AVERAGE
MURDER FY 1986 94 99 86 92 871 98 FY 1985 84 105 71 86 846 87 ~ CHANGE 11.9~ -5.7~ 21.1'i 7.0~ 7.2~ 6.9'1
RAPE FY 1986 516 406 870 525 1817 454 FY 1985 461 422 349 440 1672 418 S CHANGE 11.9S -3.B~ 6.0S 19.3~ B.7,& 8.6S
- ROBBERY FY 1986 8115 8915 8499 8022 13551 888B FY 1985 8048 8760 8895 2851 18054 8264
" CHANGE 2.2'& 4.1'1 3.1'1 6.0Y. 3.8~ ~LB"
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT FY 1986 6013 4970 4495 5568 21041 5260 FY 1985 5443 5126 4711 5781 21011 5253 '1 CHANGE 10.51 -8.0'& -4.6'& -2.97. O.n. O.n.
BURGLARY FY 1986 14360 14150 18018 18197 54725 13681 FY 1985 18191 18872 12573 12085 51721 12980 '& CHANGE 8.91 2.0'& 3.51. 9.27. 5.8'1 5.8'&
LARCENY FY 1986 88757 32336 29100 84258 129446 32862 FY 1985 82274 81960 28127 81978 124884 81084
'& CHANGE 4.61. 1.2Y. 3.5'& 7.1'& 4.1'i lI.1'i
MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT FY 1986 5568 5701 5950 5954 23178 5798 FY 1985 4888 4834 4202 41'94 18218 4558 7. CHANGE 27.0'& 17 .9'& 41. 67. 24.2Y. 27.2~ 27.2'&
TOTAL FY 1986 63423 61577 56518 62606 244124 61081 FY 1985 58884 60079 53428 57960 280351 57588 Y. CHANGE 7.7'1. 2.5'& 5.B,& 8.0'& 6.0'& 6.01
*DUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF THE INDIVIDUAL AVERAGES DOESN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGES.
'"
~
LOCAL JAIL STATISTICS
Data Sources
Th~ information contained in this section of the Agency Processing Statistics is derived from Statewide data collection efforts by the staff of the Maryland Commission on Correctional Standards. The Commission staff tabulates and summarizes data submitted by local jurisdictions. Statewide aggregate data reflecting monthly trends for Fiscal Years 1985 and 1986, spanning all local jurisdictions. are displayed as value lines in the following charts: Average Daily Population in Local Jails, Local Versus DOC Sentenced Inmates, and Awaiting Tria!.. PSI and Other (Jail Population) on pages 9 to 11. The fiscal year data (FY 1985 - FY 1986) used to deriv~ these charts is presented in the tables on page 12. The Statewide Average Daily Population is calculated by Commission staff. Data on the status of local jai.l prisoners (sentenced, awaiting trial, etc.). the intake and the departures represent end of month actual counts forwarded to the Commission and aggregated.
Recent Trends
The FY 1986 avefage daily population in local jails increased 10.2% over FY 1985 (FY 1986 - 5,172 v. FY 1985 - 4.693). This growth in the average daily population incarcerated In local jails is reflected in the chart on page ,. The previous patterneof parity between total intakes and departures in FY 1985 (69,826 v. 69,424), has been brokea by the significant increase in intakes over departures in FY 1986 (73,710 v. 71,5891. This indicates that future average daily population levels could be higher than the present levels CFY 1986 average: 5.172 v. FY 1985 average: 4,693).
A complex interaction of jail population factors influences population growth as reflected in the average . daily population. Expressed as monthly averages these factors are: 1) local sentenced prisoners, 2) DOC
sentenced inmates and 3) prisoners awaiting trial, pre-sentence investigation or others (see the table on page 121. Local sentenced prisoners increased from an average of 1,507 in FY 1985 to an average of 1,607 In FY 1986.~ The influence of DOC sentenced backup on local jail population isOnot significant because the average of these prisoners dIpped from 112 in FY 1985 to 95 in FY 1986 (see the chart on page 10). The number of prisoners in local detention awaiting trial, pre-sentence investigation or in an undefined other category may be a significant yopulation factor based on the 13.9% Increase in these prisoners from 3,054 in FY 1985 to 3,479 In FY 19&6 (see the chart on page 111. The inmates awaiting trial is the leadin§ subgroup in this growth category. Caution'~ust be used in extrapolating thiS data In the context of local condit~ons at each jail and detention center.
~::';-.:;. =---=::;. C',
8
..
5599 -r I
-i. :
5499 -L-I
-.-
5399.t !
1.. i
5209 t T
5~00 + I
+ N 5000 + M , A I "fit'
- I .'-
;1
" " .'
, "
" ,J "
, ",
!J""~ "
AVERAGE DAILV POPULATION IN LOCAL JAILS FISCAL YEARS ~9a5 AND 1986
.::.' ~''''. "c ............ ,," 111"
"I' III ."., '\ " .
I I l\ ,I
" I " I " I
t, / 't I
\ / \ .................. .
" I
/' .1
/
,,1' "
"I ,r"· ,,1
I' ,.
" , ....... ,. ....................... , ....... ' "
,. ;1 " ,. "
~ 4999 t .' I' E "
S ! ~ 4809 T
f:
~ ~~ 47~0 t . ___ .../~ \
~ / , 4690 ~ /// '\\
~ y/ ~ ,
I / '------~ / 4500 -r- //
FISCAL YEAR ~986
FISCAL YEAR ~9S5 ! / ..L/
4.400~r~-------+--------+-------~---------r--------~-------+--------~------~~-------+--------+-------~ Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Ma~ Ap~ May Jun
':" MONTHS
a:
~
iNMATES
.i'}Q0 T
I I
.1.899 +
1799
LOCAL US. DOC SENTENCED INMATES FISCAL YEARS 1985 AND 1986
.• LOCAL SENTENCED 1986
,I"'. ,.1 " ~ I.' kit
"I " ~" 'l-
.1' 'I ,,' I,
tl .... 1.
•• ,...... I" _ LOCAL SENTENCED 1985 J c.··".. II,,, ............................ ........ '" .' ........ ...... ' 1.699
1590
1409
t·· '1, " I,
I I, i ., ••••• I ' .... , .... , ..... r I
I 1399 J.
.1.S9
1----I _____ ~ ..... .... . ' . " .... , ......
.......
" " " ..... ','
" "
I' ...... • ••• ,,1 ...... .
"'. ~------- --------------- .............. . .-", ...... .. ' '.,., ..... .. ,~ ... " ....
10
t······················· .. ·· ............................................ / ............................ ~ ....................................... .. ""',
I
! DOC SENTENCED 1986
'DOC SENTENCED 1985
(;)
,Jul Aug Sep Oct No ... Dec Jan Feb MaX' ApX' May Jun MONTHS
I
N
M
A
T
E
S
LOCAL JAILS: AUAITING TRIAL. P.S.I .• AND OTHERS FISCAL YEARS 1985 AND 1986
.......... , ' ..... . . ........ . " .
3 ••• T "" ..
' "" " ' , I • ' " " ,. +
" " ,,"" ,.... ""' ..
.I •••• "', ' , '. "" ' "" , " ' .. ". .' I., t' .. "', j " I
3.0S .. ' •• " "..... j I ... "" •• " •• ""." ••
' , '''''''' I !.. "\ I I
,I '. I ',' '1.1 + . " .,80.' "j
I.. ",' !" "" I " I I I ., , I
3.08 -t- .. , "
I .' " • I .. " " I .. " j +
' , , 33.... .t ," I .'
11 ,/
3298 1// '1-
I _______ 3."" + _- ~~ 3.eel /~
I .,/ V
2900.+
.. FISCAL YEAR J.986
- FISCAL VEAR J.98S
I
11
I Oct I Sep ase0 Oug Jul Noy Dec Jan Feb MaX' ApX' i'iay Jun
MONTHS
/'" '--." .-'
J?
LOCAL JAIL STATISTICS
F:i.sc:a..1 Yea.r 1986
July Aug. Sept. Oct.. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. March April May June Average** AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION 4,867 4,995 5,144 5,217 5,188 4,955 4,965 5,244 5,323 5,332 5,341 5,495 5,172
Local Set1tenced 1 t 615 1,686 1,512 1,554 1,542 1,395 1,599 1,605 1,582 1,684 1,845 1,669 1,607 DOC Sentenced 18~ckupl 11)3 102 101 122 86 66 90 83 82 101 119 88 95
Awaiting Trial 2. £tJ17 3,021 3,365 :1,227 3,166 2,902 3,187 3,338 3,350 3,072 3,091 3,285 3,1!-Q Pr9-5eTitenc9 Invest.iaatior. ~.!18 166 181 137 155 115 185 183 131 154 140 146 150 Ot.her 16S 197 164 160 171 167 125 196 179 187 167 208 175 Total;!.; 3,169 3.384 3,668 3,533 3,492 3,184 3,497 3,717 3,660 3,413 3,398 3,639 3,479
Total In'!.ake; 6,Olt;l 6.494 " n7':~ -,., ..... 6,42b 5,946 5,566 6,338 5,501 6,475 6,942 6,524 6,066 73,710 6,143 Depa"'::'u res 5,997 6,147 5,96Q 6,499 6,035 6,041 5,797 5,282 6,159 5,926 6,050 5,693 71,589 5,966
LOCAL JAIL STATISTICS
F:i.sc:a..1 yea.. .... 1985
July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. March April May June Average** AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION 4,421 4,560 4,668 4,682 4,752 4,535 4,527 4,762 4,907 4,846 4,786 4,868 4,693
Lccal Sentenced 1,422 1.506 l,.ilS'5 1,450 1,556 1,324 1,437 1,502 1,550 1,506 1,647 1,685 1,507 DOC ~en~anced {Backup} '!.2~ lOS 134 lit· 115 95 111 102 108 124 125 89 112
{';waitino Tnal 2:62~ 2,71(. 2,/414 2,788 2,761 2,615 2.716 2,856 2,907 2,799 2,779 2,770 2,756 P~e-5€ntence Inves~igatio~ 179 175 181 157 137 141 188 167 186 128 190 150 156 Oi,her 121 1.36 140 1':'2 140 123 125 149 165 154 157 169 143 To't.a.1* 2,925 3,021 3 ~ 065 3,0T7 3,088 2,879 3,029 3,172 9,208 9,081 8,066 3,089 3,054
Total ~ntake ~J870 6,206 5,89<;' :;'.8 k17 5,518 5,i17a 5,694 5,573 6,218 5,826 5,922 5,840 69,826 5,819 Dspar··ii-lIf'sS ::;,868 6 : C·ilE~ 'lJ837 5,898 5.452 5,884 5,855 5,374 6,128 5,981 5,795 5,815 69,424 5,785
*Total: Awaiting Trial, Pre-Sentence Investigation and Other. **Due to rounding, the sua of the individual averages may not equal the total average.
'J~
!J PAROLE AND PROBATION ~TATISTIC5
Data Sources
The information contained in the Division of Parole and Probation section of the Agency Processing Stati.stics is based upon an automated information system and is summarized on a Statewide basis by the Office of Research and Statistics. The Cases Under Active Supervision (see charts at pages 18 & 19 and tables at pages 24 & 25J.Cases Being Administered (see charts at pages 20 & 21 and tables at pages 26 & 27) and the intake data (see charts at pages 14 & 15 and tables at pages 22 & 23) were all extracted from the OBSCIS II automated system. Case Closings data (see charts at pages 16 & 17 and tables at pages 22 & 23) was derived by means of a formula comparing intakes to monthly changes in the Cases Being Administered totals.
ReceIJt Trends
During~Fiscal Year 1986. the Division's Cases Under Active Supervision fell from 45.528 to 44.810 cases. representing an annual decrease of 1.6%. This compares to a decreas~ in Fiscal Year 1985 of 2.7% (see dharts at pages 18 & 19 and tables at pages 24 & 25), While Active Cases decreased in Fiscal Year 1986. Total Cases Being Administered by the Division inc.reased 0.9%. from 81.454 to 82.163 cases. This compares to a growth o.f 4.3% in Fiscal Year 1985 (see charts at pages 20 & 21 and tables at pages 2f & 27).
The primary factor contributing to a lower percentage increase in Total Cases Administered during Fiscal Year 1986 was the continued contrasting trend of Intakes and Closings. The total number of case intakes processed during Fiscal Year 1986 decreased 1.1%. from 46.183 to 45.693. while case closings in Fiscal Year 1986 increased 5.1%. from 42.821 to 44.984. This significantly reduced the gap between Intakes and ClOSings, causing a 60ntinued leveling in the previously dramatic growth patteras experienced as recently as Fiscal Year 1983.
The inc~ease in Cases Being Administered and the simUltaneous decrease in Cases Under Active Supervision reflects a steadily growing percentage of non-active and delinquent cases in the Cases Being Administered c~tegory. At the end of Fiscal ,Year 1985, 55.9% of the Cases Being Administered were in an Active status {i.e.not delinquent or non-active). By the end of Fiscal Year 1986, only 54.5% of the Total Cases Being Administered were under active supervision.
~l
13
5599 T
599B
459B
1. ~ 499B t ~ S
3599
3999
2590
6BB
5BB
4911J
I i t L
sou f .~ ,
14 FV86 DIUISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION INTAHES
c· TOTAL pap
a. PROBATION
~__ ~c c Cl
------.. --- ---.. - --------- -...
~~
:-;....--
2.. t Hm:l~ ~~~~~ I I I I I I
0- PAROLE a MANDATOR. I·
JUL DEC JAN MONTHS
MAR JUN APR MIAV AUG NOU FEB SEP OCT
I N
5500 T I
51i100 .+ i
4509 + ,/~~ i / \
15 VY85 DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION INTAKES
0. TOTAL P&P
... PROBATION
~ 4000 1<
+".0 ____________ -0
I // \ '\ / ------------C _________ O~ _________ --0 -----__..., 1~ '" \ I:)
f / \ \ / /"----. .--------~/~-----.------. E S
3509
3000
2509
600
500
400
300
~ \~/ ~ ~ t \ .. / "'-.. -----I
1
l I....... ------"" + ~.", r- "-r ~/ ~~~ I .- V
... t 0- P.ROLE & MOND.TORY~
c '~ ___________ .::
iDe +l----------~----------~~----------~----------+_----------+_----------~----------~----------_+-----------+----------~----------~ Jul Aug' Sep Oct No ... Dec Jan Feb Mar> ApI' May Jun
MONTHS
5999
4599
4090
C L 0 S 3599 1.. G S
3B99
2599
2909
699
SliJ9
49B
399
21iJ9
HJ9
JUL AUG SEP
.16 FV86 DIUISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION CASE CLOSINGS
c· TOTAL P&P ~ .PROBOTI0N ~~
0- ~-:~:-~--:""TOR' 1
OCT NOU DEC JAN MONTHS
____ c~-------c
b~c"----. .~. .....-----------.
~/
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
17 FY85 DIVISION OF P~ROLE ~ND PROB~TION C~SE CLOSINGS
5099 .,..
C L o
45C1i9
4ge9
S 3599 1 N G S
3lilQ13
2509
2141313
690
599
499
3139
209
I
+ I c. TOT~L P&P f
, 0 I 1 //" I .. PRO .. "ON. -" ______
i / ~ ~ ---0_ I ~~/,..= '-. c____.. /' c.------ ~'" ~/ ---0_______ ~C/ .. -------_D____ _-------G T "" '\. / .. ____ ... _ ~ " o· / ____________ _
+ ~--- '.. / ---..
______ 0 __________ ---'°
. '/ 1 =
! , I
1
T I
t /~ ! - / ~ t .....----~ ... ~ ~ ~:: .-r <' ./'. ~ ~ -I t i t
i T t
[---: PAROLE & M~::~::J
c ::>
1.149 j l·------~---------~------+_------~----~~------~~----~~----~=_----~~----~~----~ Jul Aug Sep Oct Noy Dec Jan Feb Malt" A Pit" Hay Jun
MONTHS
~_/"".:o
UNDER
459111111
44999
43999
PROBATION. COMPACT PROBATION AND LIUE-IN CASES ACTIUE SUPERUISION BV DIUISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION
(FISCAL VEARS ~995 AND 1996)
c. FV85
m· FY86
18
C
A
S 42999
E !;
~ ~~~o ______ ~o----- ----.o-_c_ .e •••••••••••••
4~999
49999
39999
Jul
.. " .. I. ........ ..
Aug
........ .w, •••••••• ......... ,.
ral •••• , ...... .
Sep Oct
~c ___________ c
....... ...... • ••• m ............ • .. •• ....................... '" .................. , ••••••••••• ...... ...... . ... . ......... ...... '. . ........ . m' ...... . ..... , ......
Nov Dec Jan Feb MaX' ApX' May Jun
M 0 NTH S
4700
4500
4300
C
A
S
E
S
41.09
3999
3790
PAROLE. COMPACT PAROLE AND MANDATORY RELEASE CASES UNDER ACTIUE SUPERUISIOH BY DIUISIOH OF PAROLE AHD PROBATION
(FISCAL YEARS 1985 AHD 1986)
c· FY85
• FY86
........ " ..... " .. , ..
19
.........•...................•........ . ......... . •.......... "" ........................ , ................. . ...... .. .... ........ .. ......
.................................... .. ........ ......... .. ............ .
_______ --------o~-- _~.------" -°_______.0
_
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Ma:r Ap:r May Jun M 0 H T H S
78999
76999
74999
C
A
S
E
S
72999
70909
68909
PROBATION. COMPACT PROBATION AND LIUE-IN CASES UHDER ADMINISTRATION OF DIUISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION
(FISCAL VEARS ~985 AND ~986)
.................... II.JIiI ••••••••••
•• P ....... • 1 •• Knll ••• ..... . ...
20
.................... , •• '. ........... • ................. 13 ••••••••••••••••••• B ••••••••••••••••••• m ••••••••••• ,................... •••• • •••••••••••••••••••••••• 81·· •••••••• AI
___ 0
.P 0 o~o- .o~ 0 o~ _____ o-
C. FV85
.. FV86
Jul Aug Sep Oct No'll Dec Jan Feh MaX' Ap:r May Jun
H 0 NTH S
C
R
S
E
S
7200
7B99
PAROLE, COMPACT PAROLE AND MANDATORY RELEASE CASES UNDER ADMINISTRATION OF DIUISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION
(FISCAL YEARS ~985 AND ~986>
21
1
.,.".,.'!" ................•.. u ................... "', ••.•..•.••••••.•.•••.. .. ' .......• .. ' ........ .. , ................. .
............ ..' ....... ......... ................................. .. ........ . 6690 r· .. ··· .............. . " ..... ".
c, ________ --- . c
68e9
~-----" c~
6499
Jul
~c . ~ ____ c~c ------c.............--
Aug Sell' Oct . \
Nov Dec Jan
M 0 Ii T H S
c _____ ---
Feb Ma:r Ap:r May Jun
INTAKE BY TYPE OF CASE
DISTRICT COURT PROBATION** CIRCUIT COURT PROBATION COMPACT PROBATION LIVE-IN
SUB-TOTAL
PAROLE CONPACT PAROLE MANDATORY RELEASE
SUB-TOTAL
TOTAL
CLOSINGS BY TYPE OF CASE
DISTRICT COURT PROBATION** CIRCUIT COURT PROBATION COMPACT PROBATION LIVE-IN
SUB-TOTAL
PAROLE COMPACT PAROLE MANDATORY RELEASE
SUB-TOTAL
TOTAL
JULY
1,992
1,212 66 23
3,293
139 23
237
399
3,692
1,989
813 66 35
2,903
163 13
230
406
3,309
AUG
2,145
1,289 73 27
3,534
192 32
301
525
4,059
2,284
988 67 34
3,373
141 31
282
454
3,827
SEPT
1,647
1,166 62 31
2,906
117 18
188
323
3,229
1,851
815 72. 32
2,770
131 20
184
335
3,105
INTAKE AND CASE CLOSINGS,DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION (FISCAL YEAR 19861
OCT
2,114
1,332 64 34
3,5404
168 28
292
4B8
4,032
2,098
840 67 25
3,030
148 22
281
451
3,4Bl
NOV
1,835
1,197 48 23
3,103
169 22
272
463
3.566
1,872
971 33 22
2,B98
125 20
192
337
3,235
DEC
1,951
1,205 63 25
3,244
151 15
227
393
3,637
2,493
1,087 63 28
3,671
121 IB
248
387
4,058
JAN
2,174
1,459 63 2B
3,724
179 30
234
4043
4,167
2,750
1,362 62 24
4,198
187 15
251
453
4,651
FEB
1,911
1,264 65 26
3,266
136 14
199
349
3,615
2,064
1,006 60 40
3,170
121 10
201
332
3,502
HARCH
2,053
1,325 56 35
3,469
142 30
220
392
3,86i
2,004
1,113 7B 14
3,209
135 31
241
407
3,616
APRIL
2,134
1,2.97 81 30
3,542
150 20
218
3BB
3,930
2,418
1,016 78 34
3,546
146 26
216
3B8
3,934
*DUE TO ROUNDING,THE SUM OF THE INDIVIDUAL AVERAGES DOESEN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGE. **PRE-TRIAL DATA ARE INCLUDED IN DISTRICT COURT PROBATION FIGURES.
HAY
1,993
1,359 73 47
3,472
162 24
306
492
3,964
2,301
1,174 82 24
3,581
182 32
305
519
4,100
JUNE
2,120
1,289 71 31
3,511
1513 22
250
430
3,941
2,364
1,206 66 52
3,688
226 24
228
478
4,166
22
TOTAL AUERAGE1i
24,069
15,394 785 360
40,608
1,863 278
2,944
5,085
45,693
26,48B
12,391 794 364
40,037
1.826 262
2,859
4,947
44,984
2,006
1,283 65 ao
3,384
155 23
245
424
3,80B
2,207
1,033 66 ao
3,336
152 22
238
412
3,749
INTAKE BY TYPE OF CASE
DISTRICT COURT PROBATION** CIRCUIT COURT PROBATION COMPACT PROBATION LIVE-IN
SUB-TOTAL
PAROLE COMPACT PAROLE MANDATORY RELEASE
SUB-TOTAL
TOTAL
CLOSINGS BY TYPE OF CASE
DISTRICT COURT PROBATION** CIRCUIT COURT PROBATION COMPACT PROBATION LIVE-IN
SUB-TOTAL
PAROLE COMPACT PAROLE MANDATORY RELEASE
SUB-TOTAL
.JULY
2,114
979 60 15
3,16B
144 17
204
365
3,533
2,811
790 65 14
3,llBO
151 19
192
362
AUG
2,681
1,404 71 22
4,128
175 28
282
435
4,563
2,502
740 65 18
3,325
206 19
204
429
SEPT
1,984
879 68 27
2,903
110 18
172
300
3,203
2,136
754 68 20
2,978
157 24
182
363
OCT
2,872
1,153 72 88
3,635
175 26
239
440
~,075
2,656
915 72 88
3,6Bl
215 25
288
47S
INTAKE AND CASE CLOSINGS,DIUISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION (FISCAL YEAR 19B5)
NOU
2,061
1,292 62 18
3,433
128 27
820
475
3,908
2,073
570 51 23
2,717
149 24
242
415
DEC
2,129
1,221 57 24
3,431
119 17
196
332
3,763
2,243
929 46 87
3,255
133 20
196
349
.JAN
2,362
1,214 95 33
3,704
175 21
227
423
4,127
2,182
724 58 29
2,993
179 22
168
369
FEB
1,924
940 71 18
2,953
131 29
214
374
3,327
2,109
750 38 13
2,910
143 13
220
376
MARCH
2,121
1,108 64 36
3,32~
166 28
270
464
3,793
2,491
834 65 33
3,423
178 13
271
462
APRIL
2,109
1,265 90 44
3,50B
171 42
245
4S8
3,966
2,175
910 76 28
3,lB9
176 32
213
421
MAY
2,239
1,295 91 36
3,661
177 34
247
4SB
4,119
2,158
832 93 34
3,117
172 17
213
402
.JUNE
2,132
1,147 69 26
3,374
168 23
241
432
3,B06
2,183
939 76 28
3,226
164 27
210
401
23
TOTAL AUERAGE*
26,12B
13,897 86S 337
41,227
1,839 310
2,B07
4,956
46,183
2,177
1,lSB 72 2B
3,436
153 26
234
413
3,849
27,219 2,268
9,6B7 807 773 64 :US 26
37,994 3,166
2,023 169 2~5 21
2,540/ 212
4,827 . 402 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ c _____ .. ___________________________________ ~~--------
TOTAL 3,542 3,754 3,341 4,159 3,132 3,604 3,362 3,2B6 ::',OBS
*DUE TO ROUNDING,THE SUM OF THE INDIUIDUAL AUERAGES DOESEN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGE. **PRE-TRIAL DATA ARE INCLUDED IN DISTRICT COURT PROBATION FIGURES.
"
3,610 3,519 3,627 42,821 3,56B
~
TYPE OF CASE .JULY AUG
DISTRICT COURT PROB"ATIONU 24,240 23,935
CIRCUIT COURT PROBATION 16,065 16,209
COMPACT PROBATION 1,024 1,033
LIVE-IN 98 86
SUB-TOTAL 41,427 41,263
CASES UNDER ACTIVE SUPERVISION BY THE DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION (FISCAL YEAR 1986'
SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB HARCH APRIL HAY
23,625 23,288 23,061 22,786 22,846 22,821 22,800 22,840 22,606
16,284 16,457 16,523 16,590 16,825 16,895 16,912 17,019 17,016
1,025 1,024 1,040 1,034 1,031 1,036 1,020 1,023 1,018
76 77 74 77 78 70 85 74 98
41,010 40,846 40,698 40,487 "10,780 40,822 40,817 40,956 40,738
24
JUNE AVERAGE*
22,475 2S,l10
16,976 16,648
1,016 1,027
79 81
40,5416 40,866 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PAROLE 2,714 2,750 2,745 2,790 2,829 2,844 2,861 2,829 2,835 2,840 2,822 2,798 2,805
COMPACT PAROLE 407 409 403 410 414 413 423 426 428 419 414 413 415
MANDATORY RELEASE 1,019 1,031 1,043 1,051 1,064 1,051 1,064 1,064 1,047 1,064 1,047 1,053 1,050
SUB-TOTAL 4,140 4,190 4,191 4,251 4,S07 4,308 4,S48 4,S19 4,S10 4,S23 4,28S 4,264 4,270 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CASES 45,567 45,453 45,201 45,097 45,005 44,795 45,128 45,141 45,127 45,279 45,021
*D~~TO ROUNDING, THE SUH OF THE INDIVIDUAL AVERAGES DOESN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGE . • tPRE-TRIAL DATA ARE INCLUDED IN DISTRICT COURT PROBATION FIGURES.
i.~\ :8'1)
44,BI0 45,135
~~"
TYPE OF CASE JULY AUG
CASES UNDER ACTIVE SUPERVISION BY THE DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION (FISCAL YEAR 1985)
SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MARCH APRIL
25
MAY JUNE AVERAGEt ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DISTRICT COURT PROBATION** 27,207 27,031 26,689 26,279 26,111 25,847 25,659 25,230 24,873 24,680 24,607 24,421 25,720
CIRCUIT COURT PROBATION 14,218 14,540 14,467 14,530 14,979 15,053 15,354 15,423 15,448 15,587 15,770 15,820 15,099
COMPACT PR08ATION 938 944 939 939 958 966 1,004 1,033 1,030 1,036 1,028 1,024 987
LIVE-IN 83 88 92 94 90 83 95 93 94 114 119 107 96
SUB-TOTAL 42,446 42,603 42,187 41,B42 42,13B 41,949 42,112 41,779 41,445 41,417 41,524 41,372 41,901 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PAROLE 2,849 2,792 2,775 2,772 2,787 2,773 2,782 2,734 2,732 2,720 2,737 2,739 2,766
COMPACT PAROLE 341 353 348 351 353 352 351 366 382 387 398 397 365
MANDATORY RELEASE 882 911 907 923 953 954 994 967 973 965 989 1,020 953
SUB-TOTAL 4,072 4,056 4,030 4,046 4,093 4,079 4,127 4,067 4,OB7 4,072 4,124 4,156 4,OB4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------~---------------------------
TOTAL CASES 46,51B 46,659 46,217 45,BBB 46,231 46,02B 46,239 45,B46 45,532 45,4B9 45,64B 45,52B 45,9B5
*DUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF THE INOIVIDUAL AVERAGES DOESN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGE. **PRE-TRIAL DATA ARE INCLUDED IN DISTRICT COURT PROBATION FIGURES.
o
TYPE OF CASE .JULY AUG
CASES BEING ADMINISTERED BY THE DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION (FISCAL YEAR 19B6)
SEPT OCT NOV DEC .JAN FEB MARCH
'26
APRIL MAY .JUNE AVERAGE* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DISTRICT COURT PROBATION** 43,286 43,147 42,943 42,959 42,922 42,380 41,804 41,651 41,700 41,416 41,108 40,864 .112,182
CIRCUIT COURT PROBATION 30,588 30,889 31,240 31,732 31,958 32,076 32,173 32,431 32,643 32,924 33,109 33,192 32,080
COMPACT PROBATION 1,191 1,197 1,187 1,184 1,199 1,199 1,200 1,205 1,183 1,186 1,177 1,182 1,191
LIVE-IN 143 136 135 144 145 142 146 132 153 149 172 151 146
SUB-TOTAL 75,208 75,369 75,505 76,019 76,224 75,797 75,323 75,.1119 75,679 75,675 75,566 75,389 75,598 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PAROLE 4,514 A,565 4,551 4,571 4,615 4,645 4,637 4,652 4,659 4,663 4,643 4,575 4,608
COMPACT PAROLE 447 448 446 452 454 451 466 470 469 463 il55 453 456
MANDATORY RELEASE 1,668 1,687 1,691 1,702 1,782 1,761 1,744 1,742 1,721 1,723 1,724 1,746 1,724
SUB-TOTAL 6,629 6,700 6,688 6,725 6,851 6,857 6,847 6,864 6,849 6,849 6,822 6,774 6,78B
--------------------------------------------~.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~-----
TOTAL CASES 81,837 82,069 82,193 82,744 83,075 82,654 82,170 82,2B3 82,528 82,524 82,3SB 82,163 82,3S6
*DUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF THE INDIVIDUAL AVERAGES DOESN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGE. **PRE-TRIAL DATA ARE INCLUDED IN DISTRICT COURT PROBATION FIGURES.
TYPE OF CASE
DISTRICT COURT PROBATION**
CIRCUIT COURT
JULY
44,117
AUG
CASES BEING ADMINISTERED BY THE DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION (FISCAL YEAR 1985)
SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MARCH
44,306 44,104 43,820 43,808 43,694 43,874 43,689 43,319
APRIL HAY JUNE
43,253 43,334 43,283
PROBATION 26,168 26,832 26,957 27,195 27,917 28,209 28,699 28,889 29,163 29,518 29,981 30,189
COMPACT PROBATION 1,094 1,100 1,095 1,095 1,106 1,117 1,154 1,187 1,186 1,200 1,198 1,191
LIVE-IN 134 138 145 145 140 127 131 136 139 155 157 155
SUB-TOTAL 71,573 72,376 72,301 72,255 72,971 73,147 73,858 73,901 73,807 74,126 74,670 74,818
PAROLE 4,715 4,684 4,637 4,597 4,576 4,562 4,558 4,546 4,534
COMPACT PAROLE 380 389 383 384 387 384 383 399 414
MANDATORY RELEASE 1,415 1,443 1,433 1,434 1,512 1,512 1,571 1,565 1,564
SUB-TOTAL 6,510 6,516 6,453 6,415 6,475 6,458 6,512 6,510 6,512
TOTAL CASES 78,083 78,892 78,754 78,670 79,446 79,605 80,370 80,411 80,319
*DUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF THE INDIVIDUAL AVERAGES DOESN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGE. **PRE-TRIAL DATA ARE INCLUDED IN DISTRICT COURT PROBATION FIGURES.
4,529 4,534 4,538
424 441 437
1,596 1,630 1,661
6,549 6,605 6,636
80,675 81,275 81,454
27
AUERAGE~
43,722
28,310
1,144
142
73,317
4,584
400
1,528
6,513
79,830
'0
:"', ,~ J
\0 DIVISION OF CO~RECTION STATISTICS
6
Data Sources
The information contained in the Division of Correction section of the Agenty Processing Statistics is based upon data from a combination of manual and automated information systems that are summarized at the Office of Research and Statistics. The monthly average total populations (see charts.at pages 30. 31 & 33 and table at page 36) are calculated from daily population sheets submitted by the Data Processing Office of the Division of Correction_ The daily population sheels are manually compiled at Division Headquarters ba~ed on telephone reports from each institution. Intake and Release i~lormation (see charts at pages 30. 31. 32. 34. & 35 and tables at pages 37 & 38) is compiled from monthly repoits sent to the Office of Research and Statistics by the individual DOC institutions. Average sentence length by jurisdiction and life and death sentente by jurisdiction information (see tables at pages 39. 40, 41 & 42) is based upon information from the male and female reception centers. This information is also received monthly and applies only to.new court comm! tmen t s.
The Inmate Characteristics Report (see tables at pages 43 thru 49) is based almost entirely upon data from the Offender Based State Correctional Information System (OBSCIS1. The only exception is that manual population d ta is used in the Sex Distribution table at page 43 to allow comparisons to be made between the attual popul tion and the computerized count~ for each institution. All of the remaining characteristic information s extrac.ted from OBSCrS vi,a a computerized data interface software package~
Recent Trends
During FY 1986, the Division's average daily total population increased by 2.2% from 12,507 during July to 12.781 during ~une. The lowest monthly population occurred during January when an average of 12.451 inmates were committed to the Division. Population data is displayed on charts at pages 30. 31 & 33.
Tile ~ost significant factor contributing to the growth in population was increasing i·ntakes. To,tal intakes nu~p~red6,297 or 52$ pe.f month during FY 198.6, compared to 5.694 or 475: per monfh in FY 1985. Total r~leases tnqreased from 5,644 Of 470 per month in FY 1985 to 5,839 or 487 per mo~th in py 1~86. Total intakes increased 10.6%. betw~en fiscal years while total releases increased by 3.5%. Intake .and release informatio'n is presented on data tables at pages 37 & 38 and the charts at pages 30, 31 & 33.
i~.
':..
28
"
1.3299
1.3000
1.2809
T
DIVISION OF CORRECTION INTANES, RELEASES AND AVERAGE DAILV POPULATION
FISCAL YEAR 1986
30
~ 1.2600 A L + --. . - . -----., p 1.2400 0 p U 1.2200 L A
I 1.2000 0 N
1.1.800
1.1.600 !
1.1.400 .L 625 600 575 550
~ 525 ~ 590 ~ 475 S 450 A 425 N 1) 400
I ~ ---~II - .... ,,~ .. ~
+ .. ,a~"'··'·· R 375 f: 350 ~ 325 ~ 300 S 275
250
225 200 t _.
JUL AUG SEP OCT
" ----\ ~ -----." I, __ ----c . --" .................... P .................. ~............... 0 ..... ..... . ..•
......... ." .. ,. ··"-"~D''I··
--<=I-FV86 IHTANE
··--FY86 RELEASES
NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN M 0 NTH S
13299
1.3999
1.2899
'I ¥ J.2699 A L P 1.2499 o P U J.2299 L A I J.2099 o N
1.J.899
1.1.699
11.490
625 609 575
559
~ 525 ~ 599
~ 475 S 450 A 425 ~ 499 ~ 3"15 t 350 ~ 325 S 390 E S 275
250 225
T I
+ t
DIUISIOH OF CORRECTION INTANES. RELEASES AND AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION
FISCAL YEAR J.985
31
+ - ________ a ._______ •• •
• •
-c:"F1l85 IN'IANES
..... FY85 RELEASES
290 +I--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+------~ Jttl Aug Sep oct Nov Dec Jan Feb MaX' Ap:r May Jun
Ii 0 NTH S
H
il
M
B
E
R
()
F
I
Ii
Jot
A
T
E ~
659 -rI
625 -l-i
I I
699+
I 575t
""t t ! 1"'1
475
450
1 42>51' 409
37.t I
..... J
I I
\ \ I • \ t
i -I I ,
Ij ..
DIUISION OF CORRECTION TOTAL INTAKES
FY 1985 AND F~ 1986
~ I ~ . \ I \ I \
'\ \ I
m . ,; .\
1\ I I I ! , \
'1 J
\ 1;-\ ' I I
. \) \ ..
\ I V
c
\
\
I:J .. F~ 1.986
HH ft hE
cr· fOThl85 INTA1<E
c
3501 I I I I I I I I I I I JilL AUG SEP OCT NOU DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
H 0 NTH S
650
625
609
575
550
525
500
DIUISION OF CORRECTION TOTAL RELEASES
F~ 1985 AND F~ 1.986
~ I \ I \ I I I c
I \ m. I \ i'1\ I I t \ I
III .. .. 475 -I- 1'\ I ,I t i \
450n" \ V\l C 11/ \ ! .. ..
425 1 ." \ ' c
o
490
375
~2
c
II. FY 1.986 }i~U:kSES
c· fOThlS5 RELEASES
350 I I I I I I I I I I I I JUL AUG sEP OCT NOU l>EC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
Jot 0 NTH S
DIVISION OF CORRECTION 33 AVERAGE DAIL~ TOTAL POPULATION FOR FY 85 AND F~ 86
135Q9 T
133Q9
.13.100
N U 12909
M
B
E
R
o F
I
N
M
A
T
E
S
.12700
12509
1.2309
.12:199
:1.1909
•...... , ... ..... ... , •. , ......... . •... " .. , ...........• ....... ," ••••• 11 ...... -~- -"'----- p,..,.:~,.. 0- -l:l __ ..."....-- - -----e- ,." .e ..... ""...... ,.,
--- ••••••• ....... "I ___ t:I- ................. • ........ . ················!!...,~···,,··· ..................... m ••••• •• --e CO F~ 1.985
• FIl 1.986
11 709 E~ lmffiuH~CAL
1 f~~~&III~~~I~ifthE
1.1.5Q9~----~~~--~~------~~-----+-------+-------4------~:-------~------+-------+-----~ Jul Ma!:l Jun Sep- Oct Dec Feb Ma:r Ap:r Aug Nov Jan
M 0 NTH S
300
275
25e
225
20e
R E ~75
L
E ~50 A
S
E .125
S
.10e
75
50
25
e C)
T 1
DIVISION OF CORRECTION MANDATORY AND PAROLE RELEASES
FY ~985 VS, FV .1986
+ , ........ J .,1. "'\,. ::1_
34
• " " ,I' '" ,,' "
-. II"
1 .,., £, " '1, .' "-.' .•.. " ............... ,
I -..... ,I" / """ . . ............... ' r· II ",.
I I' ""- .; " f ,_".... '""""'- .;
I ,/...."."""'" -~t:. __ .~-'::l
"' '" " I, ,,' •••••• ,I' \1. " .,' \
'. --::r'.,.:..-"~.",or~- '. t\ ... ~ -' I,
"" n " -- • "..,' ~----""" " " , ""'...
~~f-=-l_c;;
" , I'
jf
i. 1
~T ..•.••. 4'" "')',
4'- " .. ' " ~p." .'. .-,: ""It ".,t T ., ... -,-
I •
t ! I t I
.. • .... rJ"
, ...... , ...... , .. ,I " .' " " " "
,., .L.' I' ..................... ", ,I
."' ... :.$ ,,_, e' .'
-o-FV .1985 PAROLES
"-o-"FY .1986 PAROLES
-\:I-FV .1985 MANDATORV
•••. FY .1986 MANDATORY
,I
I' I'
Jul Aug Sep Oct No... Dec Jan Feb MaX' ApX' May Jun
M 0 NTH S
40
35
39
T 0
T 25
A
L
E 20t S C A P ~5 r ~4 E
S
1.0
5
,., Jul Aug Sep
DIVISION OF CORRECTION TOTAL ESCAPES FISCAL YEAR COMPARISON
FV ~985 US. F'l ~986
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feh
M 0 H T H S
MaX'
35
• F!l 85 ESCAPES
[J FV 86 ESCAPES
YEARL!l TOTALS F!l 85 89 F'l 86 -- 95
Ap:r May Jun
~6
a MONTHLY AVERAGE DAILY TOTAL POPULATION AND DOC SENTENCED INHATES IN LOCAL .JAILS
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
DOC LOCAL DOC LOCAL DOC LOCAL DOC LOCAL DOC LOCAL DOC LOCAL DOC LOCAL INST. JAILS INST. JAILS INST. JAILS INST. JAILS INST. JAILS INST. JAILS INST. JAILS
-----dULY 7929 346 7688 959 8445 169 10449 64 11685 67 12471 86 12507 79 AUGUST 7719 805 7640 289 8600 158 10585 68 11709 71 12487 74 12496 81 SEPTEMBER 7780 329 7624 249 8730 149 10676 73 11747 83 12538 90 12471 68 OCTOBER 7895 395 7677 288 8944 124 10800 78 11856 92 12571 88 12469 87 NOVEMBER 7970 396 7785 298 9134 102 10901 86 11947 80 12648 77 12495 93 DECEMBER 7987 415 7841 301 9295 86 10990 73 12024 75 12612 78 12538 88 JANUARY 7926 370 7801 285 9415 91 11037 79 12084 61 12537 87 12451 83 FEBRUARY 8002 372 7854 260 9565 102 11089 77 12145 79 12557 89 12576 80 MARCH 8048 368 7904 229 9718 104 11190 75 12198 74 12542 84 12687 80 APRIL 8031 365 7966 241 9939 105 11354 89 12322 83 12515 78 12737 78 MAY 8042 370 8117 248 10128 114 11493 77 12399 77 12551 92 12762 83 JUNE 7779 351 8284 191 10290 85 11624 91 12434 82 12512 82 12781 90 -------- ------------ -------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------- --------------AVERAGE 7926 365 7848 269 9350 115 11016 78 12046 77 12545 84 12581 82
a DOC SENTENCED INMATES IN LOCAL JAILS APPLY TO MALES ONLY AND ARE INCLUDED IN THE DOC INST. TOTALS. AVERAGES ARE BASED ON THE TOTAL NUMBER OF STATE WORKING DAYS IN EACH MONTH.
DIVISION OF CORRECTION 37 (FY 1986 INTAKES AND RELEASES)
INTAKES JUL AUG SEP OCT NO\l DEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAY JUN TOTAL AlJERAGE*
PP'OCES~EO COMM!TMENTS 419 403 346 443 484 453 503 442 452 476 472 481 5374 44B
CHANGE IN JAIL BACKUP 6 18 -20 49 -14 -44 22 -16 5 5 13 -16 8 1
RETURNED FROM PAP.OLE 36 39 30 44 23 37 39 21 47 28 34 42 420 35
RETURNED FROM ESCAPE 9 11 9 18 4 6 12 7 12 7 6 6 107 9
RETURNED FR. MENTAL HOSP. o 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 o 2 1 1 16 1
RETURNED FROM PATl!XENT 29 23 25 30 27 23 34 24 69 33 27 21 365 30
OTHER INTAKES 1 o 1 1 o o o o o o 2 2 7 1
I. TOTAL INTAKES 500 495 392 587 526 476 613 480 585 551 555 537 6297 525
I RELEASES
EXPIRATION/MANDATOP.Y 189 246 242 276 253 255 231 218 267 251 300 259 2987 249
PAROLES/CONT. ON PAROLE 134 154 120 147 144 :t~7 116 98 126 142 135 180 1653 13S
C0l1MUTATIONS o (} o o o 90 o o o o o o 90 8
COURT ORDER 69 51 35 49 53 66 44 53 52 59 44 45 620 52
PARDONED o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
TO PATUXENT 27 15 23 24 22 <39 37 24 27 82 32 32 334 28
TO i1ENTAL HOSPITAL o 2 1 4 5 2 2 1 o 2 2 2 23 2
DEATHS o 2 1 2 1 6 1 3 3 1 2 1 23 2
ESCAPES 13 9 14 9 7 7 3 7 5 6 8 7 95 8
OTHER RELEASES o 1 4 1 o 3 1 o o 3 1 o 14 1
TOTAL RELEASES 432 480 44C 512 4S5 625 435 404 480 496 524 526 5839 487
*DUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF THE INDI\lIDUAL AVERAGES DOESN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGE.
:.:~:.
DIVISION OF CORRECTION 38 (FY 1985 INTAKES AND RELEASES)
INTAKES JUL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. HAR. APR HAY JUN. TOTAL AIJERAGE*
PROCESSED COMMITMENTS 386 409 378 446 406 825 418 864 417 385 455 414 4798 400
CHANGE IN JAIL BACKUP -23 16 20 -2 9 -22 22 -17 -7 19 -2 -24 -11 -1
P.ETURNED ;-ROM PA~OLE 36 47 40 46 36 32 36 32 47 30 46 30 458 38
RETURNED FROM ESCAPE 9 13 13 6 10 12 7 8 5 7 10 8 103 9
RETURNED FR. MENTAL HOSP. 5 7 2 o o 2 1 5 3 3 5 2 35 3
RETURNED FROM PATUXENT 31 88 29 20 5 28 40 26 28 24 29 21 309 26
OTHER INTAKES o o o o 1 o 1 o o o o o 2 o
TOTAL INTAKES 444 525 482 516 467 377 520 413 488 468 543 451 5694 475
RELEASES
EXPIRATION/MANDATORY 215 218 238 230 231 266 229 237 251 256 262 251 2884 240
PAROLES/CONT. O~ PAROLE 128 149 111 152 107 156 129 148 130 165 176 144 1695 141
COM,1UTATIONS o o o o o 27 o o o o o o 27 2
COUl=:T ORDEP. 55 47 42 46 47 61 38 48 51 62 6E 63 617 51
PAPDONED o o o o o o o o o o o o o ··'0
TO PATUXENT 30 20 16 20 16 25 18 81 28 17 29 85 280 23
TO MENTAL HOSPITAL 4 8 5 1 o o 8 8 2 3 8 o 27 2
;)EATHS 2 2 7 5 1 2 o 8 2 o 2 2 28 2
eSCAPES 9 13 7 11 6 5 4 .!j 4 5 8 4 80 7
OTHER RELEASES 1 o o o 1 c o o o 2 1 1 6 1
TOTAL RELEASES 444 452 426 465 409 542 416 474 463 S10 543 500 5644 470
*DUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF THE INDIVIDUAL AVERAGES DOESN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGE.
<"
.JURISDICTION BALTIMORE CITY ALLEGANY ANNE ARUNDEL BALTIMQl:iE CALVERT CAROLINE CARROLL CECIL CHARLES DORCHESTER FREDERICK GARRETT HARFORD HOWARD KENT MONTGOMERY PRINCE GEORGE' QUEEN ANNE'S SOMERSET ST. MARYS TALBOT WASHINGTON WICOMICO WORCEriTER TOTALS
.JUL AUG. SEP.
DIVISION OF CORRECTION AVERAGE LENGTH OF SENTENCE OF COMMITTED PERSONS BY JURISDICTION
FY 19B6* (MALES AND FEMALES)
OCT. NOV. DEC. .JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY .JUN.
-t AVG oJ LOS
Ave; ~
LOS AVG oJ LOS
AVG '" LOS
AVG '" LOS
AVG '" LOS
AVG '" LOS
AVG • LOS
AVG ,. LOS
AVG 4 LOS
AVG ,. LOS
AVG LOS
228 47.3 208 42.8 3 26 7 60.4
10 53.4 21 81.7 39 50.8 42 43.3
1 86 0 0 4 16.5 7 120 4 31.5
10 61.2 12 38
1 18 5 48 2 6 5 151
10 21 .1 18 8 155
46 118 1
1 60 60
8 22 4 58.5 6 46 8 87
o 4
o 68
9 88.7 o 0 2 90 4 25.5 3 44 4 72 1 6
11 95.~·
58 85 1
3 18 58
5 48 3 26 4 67.5 2 54
4 87.5 5 10.8 416 57.4 399 53.9
189 43.3 o 0
10 84 28 69.6
4 39 6 82 3 18 8 79.5
11 47.5 1 18 5 110 1 12 2 42 4 39 3 50
12 74.5 35 69.9
2 12 1
2 1
96 24 86
2 90 5 89.6
230 41.1 1 6
15 69.6 58 56.2
1 86 3 34 4 80 5 64.8
11 88.4 3 44 2 180 2 42 6 66 5 22.8 4 22.5 8 80.8
54 61.9 1 6 3 20 5 43.2 1 12 2 108 5 72
5 94.8 6 77 340 53.5 435 50.2
268 38.4 2 30
29 66.2 45 38.9
5 82.8 6 48 1 300 6 117
12 49 o 0 1 120 2 93 4 52.5 6 72 1 800
23 118 42 76.3
3 12
255 41.5 8 14.6
11 67.1 37 82.4
3 168 2 9 1 12
11 106 13 38.3
4 135 1 120 2 48 2 180 4 104 1 18 8 50.3
53 72.5 4 12
4 34.5 8 26 5 27.6 4 33 o 0 2 66 7 65.1 7 58.3 4 19.5 7 80.6 3 72 7 66
479 50.S 450 54
297 52.9 7 56.6
12 79.5 47 50.6
6 116 3 30 3 30 2 39
11 44.7 o 0 o 0 3 35 8 117 2 78 2 12
17 126 42 93.3
4 24 o 0 6 58 3 26 5 74.4 9 56 3 84
492 60.6
234 52.5 3 104 7 80.6
53 55.2 6 80 6 32 1 120 6 94
21 50 1 36 3 112 2 78 6 48 3 24 6 15
13 114 45 103 o 0 2 12 4 18.8 2 12 8 192 9 88 2 48
43S 61.1
249 44.2 1 18
21 54.9 47 76.1
3 60 8 36.4 1 24 5 81.6 9 42 3 140 4 144 4 15 2 66 6 37 2 15
14 44.1 36 103
2 33 3 22 2 24 8 146 9 94.7 7 78 5 148
446 57.3
266 41.9 6 17
17 86.1 39 57.4 11 101
6 22 2 198 2 42
10 48.2 1
6 36 66
5 37.2 6 106 5 27.6 6 48
12 107 29 70.8
1 86 1 12 1 60 5 34.8
287 39.4 2 6
12 41.5 82 51
8 48 6 27 2 57 4 102
12 50 o 0 4 117 2 42 5 189 2 99 4 80
14 141 44 91.8
1 120 5 27.6 8 106 3 48
272 34.5 8 56.3
17 68.6 25 45.8
9 69.3 12 32.5
1 36 2 48
19 64 .. 4 4 72 3 172 1 12 6 112 9 78.7 7 58.3 6 59
37 130 o 0 o 1 2
o 60 48
12 55,5 8 79.5 6 44 14 48.9 8 63.8 16 51.4
3 58 2 168 13 55.4 466 51.3 465 53 476 50.9
)C)
TOTAL
,. AVG LOS
2983 43.3 .liS 41.1
lS2 69.2 492 55.S 52 S4.3 69 44.4 23 60.5 65 S2.0
150 50..11 lS S2.7 36 107.3 30 36.5 55 96.3 60 51.S 3S 39.S
146 101.2 516 88.5
20 25.5 26 32.5 41 42.7 29 49.9 71. 72.S 94 57.6 5S 71.3
5302 54.5
*THE NUMBERS (-t) LISTED FOR EACH .JURISDICTION REPRESENT THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF COURT COMMITMENTS FOR THE RESPECTIVE MONTHS NOT INCLUDING LIFE SENTENCES AND DEATH SENTENCES. THE AVERAGE LENGTHS OF SENTENCE (AVG. LOS) WERE CALCULATED USING THE HIGH RANGE OF THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE RANGES: 3 MONTHS, 4-6 MONTHS, 7-12 MONTHS, 13-18 MONTHS, 19-24 MONTHS, 25-36 MONTHS, 61-96 MONTHS, 97-120 MONTHS, 121-180 MONTHS, 181 MONTHS AND OVER. THE HIGH RANGE WAS USED BECAUSE MOST SENTENCES FALL AT THE UPPER END OF EACH RANGE. 300 MONTHS WAS USED FOR THE 181 MUNTHS AND OVER CATEGORY.
NOTES: 1 INTERSTATE COMPACT COMMITMENT IS INCLUDED IN THE .JULY TOTAL.
Iff"}
DIVISION OF CORRECTION LIFE SENTENCES AND DEATH SENTENCES OF COMMITTED PERSONS BY JURISDICTION FY 1986
(MAL.ES AND FEMALES)*
.JUL. f\UG. SEP. OCT. NOIJ. DEC. .JAN. FEB . MAR. APR. MAY .JUN. TOTAL .JURISDICTION L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SAL TIMORE CITY 5 1 2 3 3 6 3 6 2 2 6 2 40 1 ALLEGANY 0 0 ANNE ARUNDEL 0 0 BALTIMOl=:E 1 1 2 1 4 1 CALVERT 0 0 CAROLINE 0 0 CARROLL 0 0 CEq;:. 0 0 CHARLES 1 1 0 DOp.Cm:STEp. 0 0 FREDERICI( 2 1 3 0 GARRETT 1 1 0 HARFORD 0 0 HOWARD 1 1 1 3 0 KENT 0 j)
MONTGOMERY 2 1 1 1 2 1 8 0 PRINCE GEORGE'S 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 2 13 0 QUEEN ANNE'S 0 0 SOMERSET 0 0 ST. MARYS 0 0 TALBOT 0 0 WASHINGTON 1 1 1 3 0 WICOMICO 1 1 0 WORCESTER 1 1 0 TOTALS 7 1 6 0 9 0 7 0 7 0 4 0 11 0 4 0 5 0 10 0 7 0 1 1 78 e
* L = LIFE SENTENCE {INCLUDES LIFE PLUS SENTENCES} D = DEATH SENTENCE
..JURISDICTION BALTIMORE CITY ALLEGANY ANNE ARUNDEL BALTIMORE CALVERT CAROLINE CARROLL CECIL CHARLES DORCHESTER FREDERICI( GARRETT HARFORD HOWARD KENT MONTGOMERY PRINCE GEORGE' QUEEN ANNE'S SOMERSET ST. MARYS TALBOT WASHINGTON WICOMICO WORCESTER TOTALS
..JUL. AUG.
* 187
2 18 39
1 8 5 5
10 9 1 4 5 2 2
12 37
4 o 7 1 4 6 8
378
AUG * LOS
44 192 9 3
43 14 84 36 18 1 23 3 23 2 47 14 33 1 40 2 36 5 39 1
113 2 27 13 12 2 78 13 67 71 17 2 o 1
35 4 12 4 80 0 20 6 64 5 51 403
AUG * LOS
43 194 52 2 74 17 45 34
300 3 36 3 12 1 88 15 64 9 96 3
107 2 60 0
150 7 65 1 42 2 81 8 89 36 12 4 12 5 45 3 60 0 o 5
58 10 91 5 59 369
DIVISION OF CORRECTION AVERAGE LENGTH OF SENTENCE OF COHHITTED PERSONS BY JURISDICTION
FY 19B~* 'HALES AND FEHALES)
SEP. OCT. NOU. DEC. ..JAN . FEB. MAR. APR. MAY ..JUN.
AUG • LOS
46 215 12 7 76 16 41 58
126 0 48 6
6 4 48 16 71 16 60 2 36 0 o 1
75 2 36 7 36 3 78 8 78 38 14 3 14 1 64 17 o 4
52 5 85 4
149 6 55 439
AUG • LOS
39 212 34 4 55 12 52 48 o 6
16 1 83 3 55 7 37 12 15 2 o 4
12 4 78 5 60 7 46 0
101 6 69 36
8 4 96 3 43 4 18 3
142 4 105 8
45 4 48 399
AUG • LOS
38 162 99 8 61 16 47 37
128 5 12 0 58 1 51 5 69 10 60 3 36 0 30 3 54 2
115 4 o 5
133 14 84 23 38 1 64 1 71 7 28 1 66 6
100 4 26 3 52 321
AUG :t LOS
53 213 30 3 39 10 31 49 62 6 o 4
24 5 66 7 73 8 24 0 o 1
32 1 39 9 33 8 14 4 96 22 89 42 36 1 12 0 33 3 12 1
173 1 17 10 32 0 54 40B
AUG • LOS
43 24 99 45 33 33 96 81 74 o
60 6
74 80 53
122 101
96 o
36 180
96 70
o 59
198 5
16 34
3
7 2 4
12 6 o 1 2 2 1
11 32
2 1 5 2 o 7 7
360
AUG • LOS
46 207 10 6
102 16 35 40 50 4 77 0 21 4 32 9 41 8 68 3 o 4
24 4 48 1 60 8 36 2 61 16 65 45 21 1 12 4
110 7 96 1 o 4
59 12 61 5 51 411
AUG • LOS
40 215 9 4
86 12 60 40
102 1 o 0
47 5 49 5 38 8
104 4 171 4
33 2 96 5 40 8 48 1 57 15 87 34 12 1 36 0 28 2 12 5 57 2
1065 53 1 54 319
AUG ,. LOS
47 240 62 2 37 21 75 45 60 4 o 3
108 2 24 13 38 10 98 3 80 0 90 6 98 3
106 11 12 1 81 5
107 40 120 1
o 8 24 8 42 4
159 2 50 14 18 5 60 451
AUG :t LOS
51 199 93 1 70 17 41 48 75 2 28 6 42 4 41 8 42 10
132 1 o 2
25 1 52 2 48 11 24 5
103 17 81 41 24 5
119 1 34 2 18 5
108 5 42 14 35 1 54 40B
AUG LOS
47 60 94 39 78 47 66 40 25 12
108 300
48 28 43 72 54 31 36 36
113 110 52 60 51
TOTAL
•
41
AUG LOS
2434 44.7 47 37.1
lB5 69.4 508 49.6 36 84.6 41 38.6 38 59.8
lOB 54.3 120 51.1
38 65.1 23 89.9 28 44.1 45 77.6 82 61.7 2B 35.1
147 87.0 475 81.3
29 27.9 25 61.0 69 45.1 31 5S.S 38 105.3
100 65.6 50 62.5
4726 5<1.0
*THE NUMBERS Iv) LISTED FOR EACH JURISDICTION REPRESENT THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF COURT COMMITMENTS FOR THE RESPECTIUE MONTHS NOT INCLUDING LIFE SENTENCES AND DEATH SENTENCES. THE AUERAGE LENGTHS OF SENTENCE (AUG. LOS) WERE CALCULATED USING THE HIGH RANGE OF THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE RANGES: S MONTHS, 4-6 MONTHS, 7-12 MONTHS, lS-18 MONTHS, 19-24 MONTHS, 25-S6 MONTHS, 61-96 MONTHS, 97-120 MONTHS, 121-180 MONTHS, 181 MONTHS AND OUER. THE HIGH RANGE WAS USED BECAUSE MOST SENTENCES FALL AT THE UPPER END OF EACH RANGE. SOO MONTHS WAS USED FOR THE 181 MONTHS AND OUER CATEGORY.
NOTES: 1 INTERSTATE COMPACT COMMITMENT IS INCLUDED IN THE ..JULY TOTAL.
Lf2
DIUISION OF CORRECTION LIFE SENTENCES AND DEATH SENTENCES OF COMMITTED PERSONS BY JURISDICTION FY 1985
'HALES AND FEMALES).
JUL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOU. DEC. JAN. FEB. HAR. APR. HAY JUN. TOTAL JURISDICTION L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D L D
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BAL TIMORE CITY 5 1 2 3 3 6 3 1 1 2 2 28 1 ALLEGANY 0 0 ANNE ARUNDEL 1 1 0 BALTIMORE 1 1 2 1 1 1 7 0 CALVERT 1 1 0 CAROLINE 0 0 CARROLL 0 0 CECIL 0 0 CHARLES 0 0 DORCHESTER 0 0 FREDERICK 2 1 1 -4 0 GARP.ETT 1 1 2 0 HARFORD 1 1 2 0 HOWARD 1 1 1 1 -4 0 KENT 1 1 0 MONTGOMERY 2 1 1 1 1 6 0 PRINCE GEORGE'S 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 11 0 QUEEN ANNE'S 0 0 SOMERSET 0 0 ST. MARYS 0 0 TALBOT 0 0 WASHINGTON 1 1 2 0 WICOMICO 1 1 2 0 WORCESTER 0 0 TOTALS 7 1 6 0 9 0 7 0 7 0 .q 0 5 0 .q 0 6 0 6 0 -4 0 6 0 71 1
* L = LIFE SENTENCE (INCLUDES LIFE PLUS SENTENCES) D = DEATH SENTENCE
" .. : "j>
INSTITUTION MPEN MRDCC MHC MCIJ MCIH MCTC ROXB BBCF PATX-A MCIW JPRU CLPRU BCCC EPRU BPRU PHPRU SMPRU DHE DHW MCPRC THIi:ESH PRUW DOC TOTAL PATXN DEPT. TOTAL
MALE 1206
798 1616
940 1765 2515 1289
562 90
XXX 275 191 391 109 189
99 105
44 44
2 29
XXX 12259
612 12871
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
SEX DISTRIBUTION
FEMALE
409
33 442
442
TOTAL 1206 798
1616 940
1765 2515 1289
562 90
409 275 191 391 109
"189 99
105 44 44
2 29 33
12701 612
13313
INMATE CHARACTERISTICS
SEX AND RACE DISTRIBUTIONS
INSTITUTION MPEN MRDCC MHC MCIJ MCIH MCTC ROXB BBCF PATX-A MCIW JPRU CLPRU BCCC EPRU BPRU PHPRU SMPRU DHE DHW MCPRC THRESH PRUW DOC TOTAL PATXN
.u. 'W
896 502
1280 693
1329 18(15
787 427
40 281 197 12"1 314
72 161
62 80 37 33
'"1-;0 .... 21
9; .56 372
9538
BLACK "/ 'n
75.8 68.7 79.4 72 ... 6 74.9 7; .5 61 ... 1 78'.2 69.0 68.0 69.9 62.7 81.8 65.5 87 ... 0 64.6 72.7 86.0 82 ... 5 50.0 96.4 65.6 72.8 60.8 ..,.-'") r)
1 ........ 1:-
RACE DISTRIBUTION
WHITE ~ %
282 229 33i 260 44(.:i 71 )">
496 'j i 9
18 132 85 72 70 38 24 ~.<1 ~.
30 6 7 'I i
1 '1 34~)!j
238 :5643
23.9 3'1 •. 3 20.5 27.3 ;24.8 28.5 38.5 21.8 31.0 32.0 30.1 37.3 18.2 34.5 13.0 35.4 27.3 14.':1 17.5 50.0 3.6
34.4 27.0 383 27",6
.u. ,r 2
1 'j
5
6
INDIAN "/ ,. ",2
• 1 • 1
.0
.0
... 2
.0
July 1986
JL V
OTHER
2
5 1 6
15 1
16
% .2
.1
.3
.0 ".5
• 1 .2 .1
The totals for the inmate characteristics contained in this report, with the exception of the sex distribution table, represent the OBSCIS I system data available for the respective categories on the date of the report. The totals on the Sex Distribution table represent the actual total population on the date of the report. Information for an additional 91 inmates housed in local jails is not available. Note that approximately 5 of the inmates listed at PRUW are federal inmates being contractually housed there.
43
TOTAL
1182 731
1613 954
1774 2526 1289 546
58 413 282 193 384 ii0 185
96 110
43 40
2 28 32
12591 612
13203
¥.'"
July 1986 44
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
INMATE CHARACTERISTICS
AGE DISTRIBUTION (COUNTS)
UNDER OVER AVERAGE INSTITUTION 17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-50 51-60 60 TOTAL AGE
MPEN 3 5 7 15 26 34 35 45 66 291 290 189 i43 :""0 9 1188 3248 MRDCC 4 10 19 30 38 45 55 39 47 42 178 127 64 56 17 7 778 29.0 MHC 4 2 15 17 26 48 35 322 391 326 285 115 28 1614 36.2 MCIJ 1 9 20 30 27 36 45 36 50 270 191 i 19 86 28 0 957 31.2 , MCIH 5 23 43 68 86 107 111 i 08 H8 479 297 177 1'"l~ "-oJ 24 7 1778 29.2 MCTC 9 33 62 102 146 192 203 208 202 164 725 291 i 12 67 12 3 2531 26.3 ROXB 3 3 23 43 64 60 77 82 73 69 309 248 i -18 85 25 7 1289 29.3 BBCF 1 5 19 22 24 29 42 42 37 128 90 51 4(~ 12 4 546 29.4 PATX-A 3 2 4 2 3 6 7 5 ii 7 2 4 2 58 27.7 MCIW 3 5 8 1 1 19 18 17 25 129 75 51 39 4 2 406 30.6 JPRU 1 4 8 10 13 17 21 16 73 56 3-1 22 9 282 30.6 CLPRU 2 7 8 12 1 1 12 15 49 40 23 14 193 29.6 BCCC 5 13 17 20 25 24 37 101 68 40 21 9 4 385 29.8 EPRU 3 2 3 7 2 9 9 31 17 16 9 2 110 30.5 BPRU i 4 9 9 14 12 15 57 35 16 12 185 29.3 PHPRU 3 6 3 9 4 3 4 27 22 .., 4 2 96 29.3 I
SMPRU i 5 2 3 9 .., 7 9 29 23 8 4 3 110 28.7 I
DHE 1 3 2 6 4 i 3 14 2 5 i 43 26.7 DHW 1 2 3 2 4 2 3 7 9 4 40 '")0 -..:..w .. j
MCPRC 1 2 28.0 THRESH 2 3 2 2 6 8 3 2 28 29.4 PRUW 1 3 2 .., 7 8 3 32 32.1 I
DOC TOTAL 16 60 156 305 442 547 674 697 719 726 3243 2295 1370 1023 294 84 12651 30.1 PATXN 6 4 25 16 31 29 44 38 31 187 109 C;;"'" _::> 33 4 612 28.6 DEPT. TOTAL 16 66 160 330 458 578 703 741 757 757 3430 2404 1425 105.:!! 29B 84 13263 30.0
UNDEF: INSTITUTION 17
MPEN MRDCC MHC NCIJ MCIH MCTC ROXB BBCF PATX-A MCIW JPRU CLPRU BCCC EPRU BPRU PHPRU SMPRU DHE DHI,.,I MCPRC THIi:ESH PIi:UW DOC TOH1L PATXN DEPT. TOTAL
.5
A .2
... of
. i
17
.3 1.3
.1
.3 1.3
42 .2
5 ... 2
i .':1
.5 1 .0 .5
i8
.4 2.4
.9 ~ -z .. ..., 2.4 i . B
... 9 3.4
"? . . .4
.3
.9 2.3 2.5
1 .2 .7
1.2
\2
July 1986
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
'19
.6 3.9
... 2 2. i 2.4 4.0 3.3 3.5 6.9 L2 i ·' . -. i.0 i ",3 2.7
.5 3. i 4.5 7 ..• ';) 5.0
2.4 4. i 2 ... 5
20
1.3 4.9
• 1 3 .. i ~ 0 .:l.w
5.8 5.0 4.0 3.4 2.0 2.8 ~46
3.4 i .8 2 ... 2 6.3 L8 2.3 2.5
7. i 3.1 3.5 2.6 3.5
21
2.2 5.8
.9 2.8 4.B 7.6 4.7 4 ., . ..., "" '") .J.~
2 ... 7 3.5 4. i II ~ -'''"' . '") ~
...:... (
4.9 3.1 2 ... 7 4.7 ~1 I:; •• oJ
4.3 5.1 4.4
INMATE CHARACTERISTICS
AGE DISTRIBUTION (PERCENTAGES)
OVER AVERAGE 22 23 24 25 26-31 31-35 36-40 41-50 51-60 60 TOTAL AGE
2.9 7. i i . i 3.8 .5.0 8.0 6.0 5.3
10.3 4 "? .. 4.6 6.2 5 ... 2 6.4 4.9 9.4 B ?
14.0
2.9 5.0 1 .6 4.7 . ... 0 ... ...:.:
8.2 ·~ ... 4 "? -} ... 4 .,
.-r
6.0 5.7 1. e:; u.~
LB 7.6 4.2 6.4 o 7 J ... ....J
5.0 10.0
'10.7 3. i .- ~ ::> • .:l 4 -1 .. 5.3
9.4 5.5 ~ '") ( . ...:.. 5.6
3.B 6.0 3.0 3.B 6. i 8.0 r.;- .., oJ ••
"? -) . .. 12. 'j 4.2 7.4 6.2 6.2 8.2 6.5 3. i 6.4 2.3 5.0
50.0 7. i
5.7 6.2 5 ... 7
5.6 5.4 2 ... 2 5.2 1. • ,-, ... 0
6.5
'" ' _."'t
6.8 8.6 6 ... 2 J~ 7 oJ ••
7.B 9.6 8.2 8. i 4.2 8.2 7.0 7 ... 5
7. i 6.3 5.7 5. i .- ~ ::>"" l
24.5 22.9 20.0 2B.2 26.9 '")0 L .:... \-.... '-'
24.0 23.4 19.0 31.8 25.9 '")e:; ., k ........ ""i'
26.2 '")0 '"l k\J ... k
30.8 2B. i 26.4 ~'") . .:)...:...0
17 .5
21.\4 21.9 25.6 30.6 25 ... 9
24.4 i6.3 24.2 20.0 16.7 1 i .5 19.2 16.5 12. i iB.5 19.9 20.7 17.7 15.5 18.9 22.9 20 ... 9 4.7
22.5 5,:1.0 28 ... 6 2i.9 18.1 17 .B i 8 •. j
15.9 8.2
20.2 12.4 11:),0 4.4 9 ... 2 9.3 3.4
12.6 11 .0 11.9 i 0.4 14.5 8.6 7 ... 3 7.3
i i .6 i 0.0
10.7 25.0 10.B 9.0
10.7
12.0 7.2
17.7 9.0 7 AI~ .~ . ...:...0
6.6 "? ~ •• .:l
6.9 9.6 7.8 7.3 5.5 8.2 6.5 4 .. 2 3.6 2 .. 3 2.5
7 ... i 9.4 8 .• i 5.4 8.0
2 ... 5 2 .. 2 7 ... i 2.9 1 .3
.5 1.9 '") '"l ...:.. ... ..:..
1 • 0 3.2
2.3 i.8 .5
2. i '") .~
...:... (
2.5
2.3 .7
'"l '") ...... "'~
.8 1188
.9 778 1.7 1614
.9 957
... 4 i 778
.1 2531
.5 i 289
.7 546 3.4 58
.5 4(:)6
.4 282 193
1.0 385 110 185
1.0 96 i 1 0
43 40
2 28 ~'")
~.h
.7 i 265'1 612
,.6 13263
32.8 29.0 36.2 31 .2 29.2 26.3 2!}I .3 29.4 ~~ "? k (.1
30.6 30.6 29.6 29.8 30.5 29.3 29.3 28.7 26.7 ..,0 .... ............ ..:>
28.0 29.4 32.1 30. i 28 ... 6 30.0
LI5
July 1986 lf6 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
INMATE CHARACTERISTICS
SENTENCE DISTRIBUTION (COUNTS)
AVERr~GE r~VERAGE
3 4-6 7-12 13-18 19-24 25-36 37-60 61-96 97-120 121-180 OVER 180 SENT. STAY INSTITUTION MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTI-IS MONTHS LIFE TOTAL MONTHS MONTHS
MPEN 3 4 9 22 27 46 545 531 1189 411 .1 69.2 MRDCC 5 70 146 57 76 69 88 52 67 50 78 39 797 84.7 8.4 MHC 13 45 46 47 57 132 151 172 266 584 100 1613 181 .3 63.5 MCIJ 30 i 2-, 110 84 i 21 1 ~-,
":-1 91 8i 82 i 0.5 7 9.50 82.6 30.7 MCIH 2 10 i6 12 45 155 184 219 351 715 70 1779 193.8 44.6 MCTC 34 114 102 101 2-14 574 468 387 268 253 i8 2533 96.0 30.4 ROXB 7 10 65 139 313 229 183 -\77 159 -, 1289 105.8 23.3 1
BBCF 21 60 51 55 66 89 57 40 51 46 10 546 ( \~ ... I::> 32.4 PATX-A 2 1 4 6 10 3i -4 58 242.8 13.5 MCIW ''") 1..:- 39 55 32 51 62 38 38 26 40 20 4i3 7(-;} c;-
' • ..I 22.2 JPRU -1 4 i0 '")~
.:..( 65 50 30 36 43 16 282 i 15.-; 53.1 CLPRU 6 5 1 1 23 36 24 33 29 ')-
~.:J 3 193 i04.5 36.4 BCCC 2 15 19 28 29 66 69 57 --, .:JI 5i 12 385 i 04.5 48.7 EPRU 1 -4 8 8 19 23 17 11 17 1 iiO 1 i 0.4 48.4 BPRU i 8 34 36 30 30 41 5 185 137.0 56.9 PHPRU 3 H '")-
.:...:J 20 13 7 14 4 96 105.3 48.7 SMPRU 2 4 6 9 24 28 13 1 1 13 1 i i 97.4 40.8 DHE 7 5 8 9 6 4 i 1 1 43 42.2 18.0 DHW 4 1 i 1 i -4 6 -")
.:.. 40 52.0 19.2 MCPRC i i 2 60.0 26.0 THRESH 6 2 6 3 6 i 2 i 28 42.0 19.4 PRUW i 5 3 6 5 6 i 5 32 10246 35.9 DOC TOTAL 5 188 588 495 571 908 i 838 1563 1422 i 492 2767 847 i2684 138.1 39.7 PATXN 4 13 28 94 347 126 61-2 290.9 54.8 DEPT. TOTAL 5 188 588 495 57-\ 908 1842 1576 1450 1586 31-\ 4 973 13296 i 44.2 40.4
NOTES: AVERAG-E SENTENCE LENGTH IS CI~LCULrHED BASED ON TOTAL SENTENCE LENGTH AND DOES NOT INCLUDE LIFE SENTENCES. AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY REFLECTS THE AVERAGE LENGTH OF TIME SERVED IN THE D.O.C. AS OF THE DATE OF THE REPORT. THIS FIGURE IS NOT BASED ON RELEASES AND MAY INCLUDE TIME SERVED AT MORE THAN ONE INSTITUTION.
THE LENGTH OF STAY AT MRDCC INCLUDES PREVIOUS TIME SEVED BY INMATES RETURNED FROM PAROLE, MANDATORY, ESCAPE AND PATUXENT RELEASES. WHEN THESE TYPES OF RE-TURNS ARE EXCLUDED, THE LENGTH OF STAY AT MRDCC IS APPROXIMATELY 2 MONTHS.
July 1986 47 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
INMATE CHARACTERISTICS
SENTENCE DISTRIBUTION (PERCENTAGES)
3 4-6 7-12 13-i8 i9-24 25-36 37-60 61-96 97-120 121-180 OVER 180 INSTITUTION MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS
MPEN MRDCC MHC MCIJ MCIH MCTC ROXB BBCF PATX-A MCIW JPRU CLPRU BCCC EPRU BPRU PHPRU SMPRU DHE DHW MCPRC THRESH PRUW DOC TOTAL PATXN DEPT. TOHIL
.6
.0
.0
8.8 .8
3. i .i
1.3
3.8
2.9
.5
.9
.9 2.3
3.6
1.5
-1.4
. i 18.3
2 ... 8 12.6
.6 4.5
.5 11.0 3.4 9.4
.4 3.1 3.9
.9
i .0 1 .8
i6.3 10.0
2i .4
4.6
4.4
.3 7 .. 2 2.9
i 1 .5 .9
4.0 .8
9 .. 3
13 ... 3 i .4 2.6 4.9 3.6
3.6 i 1 .6 ., .::.... ..) 7.1 3. i 3.9
3.7
. i 9.5 2.9 8.8
"7 . , 4.0 5.0
i 'ZI • i i .7 ~ "7 { . , 3.5 5.7 "7 -, .~ 7.3
.5 3.1 5.4
18.6 27.5
2i .4 15.6
4 ,.::>
4.,3
.3 8.7 3.5
i ·, £. ..:.. .. u
2.5 8.4
10.8 i 2. i
12.3 9 ... 6
i i .9 7.5 { 4.j.
4.3 11.5 8. i
20.9 I")"] r.:,:.. t "" ,j
50.0 10.7 9.4 7 ... 2
6 ... 8
.8 11 .0 8.2
13.2 8.7
'1'1 "7 t!. ..... I
24.3 16.3
'15.0 23.0 i8.7 17.1 ,- ~ I ( .... \j
i8.4 24.0 2'j .6 14.'ZI .j 0.0
2i .4 '18.8 14.5
"7 . , '13. Ii
i .9 6.5 9.4 9.5
10.3 18.5 17 .8 10.4
, 0 \J .to ~
9.2 17.7 i 2.4 17.9 20.9 19.5 20.8 25.2 9.3
i5.0 50.0 3.6
'15.6 12.3 2. i
i i .9
2 ... 3 8.4
10.7 8.4
12.3 15.3 14.2 7.3
10.3 o '"l I .. ~
10.6 17.1 14.8 15.5 '16.2 13.5 11..7 2.3
7. 'I 18.8 11.2 4.6
10.9
3.9 6.3
16.5 8.5
19.7 '10.6 13.7 9.3
17 .2 , ·X
0 • ..,
i 2.8 i5.0 9.6
10.0 '16.2 7.3 9.9 2.3 "'.5
3.6 3.1
11.8 '15.4 11.9
NOTES: AVERAGE SENTENCE LENGTH IS CALCULATED BASED ON TOTAL SENTENCE LENGTH AND DOES NOT INCLUDE LIFE SENTENCES. AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY REFLECTS THE AVERAGE LENGTH OF TIME SERVED IN THE D.O.C. AS OF THE DATE OF THE REPORT. THIS FIGURE IS NOT BASED ON RELEASES AND MAY INCLUDE TIME SERVED AT MORE THAN ONE INSTITUTION.
THE LENGTH OF STAY AT MRDCC INCLUDES PREVIOUS TIME SEVED BY INMATES RETURNED FROM PAROLE, MANDATORY, ESCAPE AND PATUXENT RELEASES. WHEN THESE TYPES OF RETURNS ARE EXCLUDED, THE LENGTH OF STAY AT MRDCC IS APPROXIMATELY 2 MONTHS. o
45.8 9.8
36.2 1L0 40.2 10.0 12.3 8.4
53.4 o "1 , . ,
15.2 11 .9 13.2 i5.5 22 .. 2 14.6 11 .7 2.3 5.0
i5.6 2L8 56.7 23.4
AVER(~GE AVERAGE SENT. STAY
LIFE TOTAL MONTHS MONTHS
44.7 ii89 4.9 797 6.2 1613
.7 960 3.9 1779
.7 2533
.5 1289 1.8 546 6.9 58 4.8 413 5.7 282 1 .6 i 93 3. i 385
.9 1i0 2.7 i85 4.2 96
iii 43 40
2 28 32
6.7 12684 20.6 612 7.3 13296
411 .1 84.7
181 .3 82.6
193.8 96.0
105.8 73.6
242.8 79.5
ii 5.7 104.5 104.5 11 0.4 137.0 105.3 97.4 4242 52.0 60.0 42.0
102.6 138.1 290.9 144.2
69.2 8.4
63.5 30.7 44.6 30.4 23.3 32.4 13.5 22 .. 2 53.1 36.4 48.7 48.4 56.9 48.7 40.8 18.0 19.2 26.0 19.4 35.9 39.7 54.8 40.4
I·
I.
INSTITUTION
MPEN MRDCC MHC MCIJ MCIH MCTC ROXB BBCF PATX~A
MCIW JPRU CLPRU BCCC EPRU BPRU PHPRU SMPRU DHE DHW MCPRC THRESH PRUW
A R S o N
1 5
10 9 9
23 16
3
5 4 2 5 2 2 2
A U T
A 0 S S T A H U E L F T T
78 71
196 149 235 351 205
79 7
41 28 26 52 16 22 17 16
5 3
4 6
i 6 3
10 3
17 7 3
1 2
99 1607 3 53
TOTAL 102 1660
DOC TOTAL F'ATXN DEPT.
56
56
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES INMATE CHARACTERISTICS
OFFENSE DISTRIBUTION (COUNTS)*
C D o I
B U R G L (~
R Y
U S D
D R U G B
R I B E R Y
ROO T R M
D E V E S
A B U S E
I R T o L I L Y C
'")~ 0 ..:..~ J
3 87 136 i 'e: 0'") Ow.,..:..
i 07 154 186 69
2 391 258 2 209 134
69 92 4 3
2 6 84 39 22 33 28 50 39 19 17 14 -!3 14 8 19 13
7 10 5 i1
1 2 6
6 i 0 -1452 "1205
23 2 10 1475 1207
i 1 4 3 3 -I
-I
16
16
3 i 9 10-1
12 65 10 70 12 47
8 -122 3 91 3 49
-I 5 44 i 22 2 i 5
22 12
9 3 6 6 6
5 7
70 704 7 3
77 707
E S C f~
P E
1 5 3 2 8 2
3
25
'")'"'-::>
F o Ii: G E R Y
F R A U D
I(
I D N A p P I N G
1 20 464 8 12 17 2 13 5 2 4 37
13 11 14 3 14 i 2 1 11 4
2 4 21 2 434 2 1 1 5 .~ i
i 1
i
3 -I
53 105 128 10
53 105 138
L A R C E N Y
1"1 A N S L A U G H T E R
M U R D E R
7 8 556 94 7 67 86 33 223
133 i 1 45 57 24 247
187 21 108 80 21 67 53 6 27
i 17 88 i 0 60 15 3 36 13 6 12 24 5 34
6 4 9 6 22 4 -j 6
10 1 4 3 6 i
3 2 4 879 167 1539
3 7 210 882 174 1749
P R a S T I T U T I o N
R {~
P E
206 2 31
138 37
216 1 135
64 12
7 2 7 1
17 i
5 875 1 136 6 101 i
S S E T X a
F~ a B B E R Y
L a E F N F E P N R S a E P
255 16 93 11
472 48 151 25 559 47 765 41 278 48 107 3
11 4 33 80 3 46
110 5 28 1 84 32 35·
7 6
7 3
3162 253 129 23
3291 276
2 1 1 1 3 1
i 1
i1
*THIS REFLECTS THE MAJOR OFFENSE FOR EACH PERSON.
July 1986 48
T R A F V F A I N C D
W E A P a N s
A V L I I o S L M
27 3 6 1
10 5 9
2
1 1 1
66
66
2 3 22 3 16
13 18 40 25 13
2 6 2 8
1
10 172 1
10 173
a T H E R S TOTAL
"I
9
9
1188 794
1614 960
1779 2533 1289 545
58 4i2 282 192 385 110 185
96 lii
43 40
2 28 32
12678 611
13289
INSTITUTION
MPEN MRDCC MHC MCIJ MCIH MCTC ROXB BBCF PATX-A MCIW JPRU CLPRU BCCC EPRU BPRU PHPRU SMPRU DI-IE DHW MCPRC THRESH PRUW DOC TOTAL PATXN DEPT. TOTAL
A R S o N
.1
.6
A S S A U L T
6.6 8.9
A U T o
T H E F T
• 1 .8
.6 12.1 -.2
.9 15.5 1.0
.5
.9 1.2
.6
1.2 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.8 1.1 2. i
.9
13.2 13.9 15.9 14.5 12.1 10.0 9.9
13.5 13.5 14.5 11 .9 17.7 14.4 11.6 7.5
14.3 18.8
.2
.7
.5
.6
.. 2
.3
.9 4.7 2.5
.8 12.7 .4
.5 8.7
.8 12.5 .4
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES INMATE CHARACTERISTICS
OFFENSE DISTRIBUTION (PERCENTAGES).
B R I B E R Y
B U R G L A R Y
1.9 .4 11.0
10.4 11.1 10.5
.1 15.4
.2 16.2 12.7 6.9 1 .5
"13.8 .5
17 .2 13.0
.9 17.3 7.6
14.6 17.1
C D o I U S R 0 T R
D V E I R o L L Y
o • \oJ
17.1 5.7
16.0
D o M E S T I C
D R U G
A B U S E
• 1 13
4.0 7.3 2.6 4.8
E S C A P E
• 1 .3 .3 · i .3
3.9 10.2 10.4 16.9
.3 • 1 1. 1 .1 .7 .4 1.0 .2 .7 .1 .3 .1 .2 7.1 .2
.6 9.0 5.2
20.4 7.8
14.6 10.1 15.5 7.0
1.7
.3
1.7 1.2 11 .2
.4 7.8 1.1 1.0 7.8
5.7 .9
8.3 1.0 1.0 11.7
1 i 4.9 3.1 5.4
16.3 23.3 12.5 27.5
50.0
14 is
7.1
.1 11.5 3.8
.1 11.1
21.4 18.8 9.5
.3 9.1
• 1
• 1
18 22
.6 5.6 1 • i .5
.6 5.3
'"l .... · .2
F a R G E R Y
F R A U D
K I D N A P p I N G
L A R C E N Y
M A N S L A U G H T E R
M U R D E R
.1 1 • 7 .6 • 7 46.8
.5 .8 .5 11.8 .9 8.4
.5 .7 1.1 5.3 2.0 13.8
.2 1.4 .5 13.9 1.1 4.7
.1 .2 2.1 3.2 1.3 13.9
.5.4 .6 7.4 .84.3
.2 1.1 .9 6.2 1.6 5.2
.2 2.0 .7 9.7 1.1 5.0 3.4 1.7 29.3
1.0 5.1 .5 21.4 2.4 14.6 1.4 1.1 1.4 5.3 1.-1 12.8 1.0 .5 .5 6.8 3.1 .5.3 1.3 1.6 .3 6.2 1.3 8.8
.9 5.5 3.6 .5.5 4.9 3.2 11.9
1.0 3.1 4.2 L0 6.3 o . ,
3.6 3.6
.9 9.0 .9 3.6 7.0
15.0 2.5 50.0
3.1 9.4 6.3 12.5 .4 .8 1.0 6.9 i.3 12.1
i .6 .5 i. 1 34.4 .4 .8 1.0 6.6 i.3 13.2
P R a S T I T U T I o N
R r~
P E
R o B B E R Y
S E X
o F F E N S r-
17 21.5 1.3 .3 3.9 11.7 1.4 .i 8.6 29.2 3.0 .i 3.9 15.7 2.6
12 31.4 2.6 .0 5.3 30.2 1.6
5.0 21.6 3.7 2.2 19.6 .6
-j2 19.0 6.9 .5 8.0
2.5 28.4 1.1 .5 24.0
4.4 28.6 1.3 .9 25.5 .9
45.4 -\ • 0 33. 3 -j. 0
31.5 16.3 15.0
25.0 9.4
.0 6.9 24.9 2.0
.2 22 21.1 3.8
.0 7.6 24.8 2.1
*THIS REFLECTS THE MAJOR OFFENSE FOR EACH PERSON.
ilq July 1986
T S R T A o F V L F A E I N NeD o
T H E R
A P V L R I I o 0 S P L M
W E A P o N S S TOTr~L
• 1 .3 3.4 .1 .2 .1 .6 .1 .1 .1 .4 .1 .4
.5
1.7
.7
1.0 .9
2 .. 3
.1 .5
. i .5
... 2 .4 2.8 .2 1.0 . i 1.4
i .0 .0 1.6
i .9 2.4
.5 2.1
.s 1.0 2.1
.5
.1
.1
.1
.2
.2
.5
.9
.9 .9 2 ... 3 2.3
2.5
3.6 3.6
.1 1.4 .1 .2
.i 1.3 .1
i 188 794
1614 960
1779 2533 1289
545 58
412 282 192 385 110 185 96
111 43 40
2 28 32
12678 611
13289
, I 0
I
I
PAROLE COMMISSION. STATISTICS
Data Sources
The information contained in the Parole Commission section of the Agency P~ocessing Statistics is based upon data recorded by Parole Commissionek's and Hearing Officers and tabulated monthly by Parole Commission staff from hearing dockets. Parole Commission activity relating to Division of Correction (DOC) and lucal jail inmate parole evaluation hearings is reported separately. The reported acUvity relating to revocation of parole hearings at DOC aJ"id local jails are combined. The vast majority of this activity occurs at DOC.
The Parole Hearing data presented in charts at pages 51 through 55 and the tables at pages 57 and 58·are based upon the recomme.ndations rendered by Parole Commission Hearing Officers and Parole Commissioners during an inmate's parole hearing. The four basic recommendations that can be made are: 1) approve parole release. Z) refuse-parole release. 3) reschedule the inmate for a rehearing at a later date. or 4) hold the decision in abeyance until further information is obtained to determine parole eligibility. These recommendations do not constitute a final decision until adopted by the Commission or affirmed after al>peal by the inmate. Th'e Parole Revocation Hearing dispositions presented in charts at page 56 and the table at page 59 are based upon the decision rendered by Parole Commissioners when inmates have been charged wit.h failing to comply with the conditions of their parole release. These charges of noncompliance with the conditions of release can be divided in two ,broad categories: NewoOffenses (where a parolee has been primariny charged with commit.ting a new crime while under parole supervision) and Technical Violations Cwhere a parolee is charged with failing to comply with such conditions of release as reporting to an agent, absconding from supervision, failing to attend treatment programs as directed, etc.L At the time of a revocation hearang. the Parole Commission can decide to revoke parole. continue parole supervision, hold the case for further information, or administratively close the case.
Recent Trends
Parole evaluation hearings for DOC prisoners decreased from 8.408 in fjscaR year CFY) 1985 to 5.008 in FY 1986. Concomltaritly the parole evaluation hearings for jail inmates aecreased from 893 in FY 1985 to 753 in FY 1986. The revocation hearing activity decreased from 975 in FY 1985 to 779 in FY 1986. Vari~tion in D
parole evaluation hearing levels and their outcomes is influenced by complex factors including: institutiej"nal population level,li, legislative enactments esta~lishing parofe eligibility and Purole Commission policies.
~"._ 0 -, """<~
~'1
::-:/
'J
P A
700
T 699
PAROLE COMMISSION DIVISION OF CORRECTION HEARINGS
FISCAL YEAR ~985
,' ......... , I' ' . ",'\ ,I
I I, / \ / \ r I, • , '\
\ I I," " . , \ ,"'." \ \ I \I \ I 'I",' . i ' \ #'J I
599+ \ I \ ,/ !
,,/ \/ \ ! { 1
I . R 4C0 o t, f
" I """ L E
~ A R ! !II G S
'00t
I I
290 "\ \
.. DOC HEARINGS FY85
DOC APPROVED F~85
-.- DOC REFUSED F~85
---",-'\,
" \ - ' -
~00
". , / '- /~ / -.. ,. ." -_/ '- / , "'- / .... " /-_., ". ," .' '" . ./ . / . '- ,<-' ."" ...... .-' .. ~, -' ~ ••.... ". . ..... ..... . ..-",-, --,,-----.-." .•.... -.... -~ .... -.....
9 I ! I I I I I I I I Jul Aug Sep Oct Noy Dec Jan Feh Ma~ Ap~ May Jun
MONTHS
700
690
590
490
3G9
299
190
PAROLE COMMISSION DIVISION OF CORRECTION HEARINGS
FISCAL YEAR ~986
'\ " \ /' \
" \ " \ ,'I " I , II I ..... \ " '\ " ,..... I /' I ,
'.' I " I ".' . ", . "" .. , ", .' .... '., II ,
,I '\ /'
1\ ,,' , " I ,,1" 'Ii'"
.. DOC HEARINGS FY86
_. DOC APPROVED FV86
- DOC REFUSED FY86
/\ ,.' ",. \.x . // ""r"-" ".-.... -"., _ .. , " ". " ........ ,.' . .'" ... ; .. :>...... ..~, _ ..... -..... -.. ,. ..-.' .. '. ' .. ~ ". .""---......... ::;:.-- ....... V "- .'
'-...-- '----- "
.' "
o I I I I I I I I .J I I
51
Jul Aug Sep Oct Noy Dec Jan Feh Ma~ Ap~ May Jun MONTHS
H E A
X G
709
690
599
409
S 300
299
.109
o
.. " .. , ...... ".
Jul Aug
.' " . , .. , ......... .
" .' ... " ........ , .. -'
Sep Oct
PAROLE COMMISSION - DIUISION OF CORRECTION TOTAL PAROLE HEARIHG$
.' " .'
" "
FISCAL VEAR .1985 US • .1986
" 'I " l,
'I "-" . " "
52
I. , "~I •.•• ,,'
" '. " " " " " '" "" , ,,' '. ..". '. .... " ....
'" ,.".,. " ...... . " I.···· ., ....................... .
DOC HEARINGS FV86
DOC HEARINGS FY85
No'll Dec Jan Feb Mal[> ApX' Ma!l Jun
MONTHS
H E A
16g
149
129
100
R 80 1 N G S
69
40
T
I
f I I
PAROLE COMMISSION - DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS PAROLE HEARINGS NUMBER APPROVED
FISCAL YEA~ 1985 VS. 1986
1\ ............................ , ~ L ••••• •••••••••
DOC APPROVED FY86
DOC APPROVED FY85
2~r 4-------I----+-___+_~
I'
"
" I' I'
" "
.' I' I'
j
/' I
l /
I /1 "
53
./ ~f .
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Ma~ Ap~ Hay Jun MONTHS
.~
H E A R I N G S
250 T
209
~S0
",,,.,:, ,,..-'
'\ -\ ',-" t, \,
" " " .. ,,-'11 .•..•. ,. -..... ".,.
~00
sea t
PAROLE COMIOHSSION - DIUISION OF CORRECTION PAROLE HEARINGS
NUMBER REFUSED
" I f ~,I' "
" "
" "
FISCAL YEAR ~98S US. ~986
\ 'I
'\
\ " "
I i' I, "
II'
. " .... ", '" " '. " .... "
"'. .,' " " 'I. "
'II ,I
" " "~I I'
" " " , '" ,,-
•• DOC REFUSED F'lf86
DOC REFUSED F'lf8S
........ "" ............. ,
o I "r
,t' "
51)
,I .' ,t
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feh MaX' ApX' Hay Jun
MONTHS
--='?.:
P H R o L E
H E A R I M G S
i
PAROLE COMMISSION LOCAL JAIL HEARINGS
FISCAL YEAR ~985
~49t ... JAIL HEARINGS FY85
I
129+ I
.. JAIL APPROVED F!l85
- JAIL REFUSED FY85
I " H!Iil-tr ,/ \
' "" " , . '" , 1 I ",,' '\ " I . I,'
11 I \ ,I' . '. .
8
·... \ ;............. ''''. I I , ~". , ............, .' I 1\ ,I \ I .t \,
\ " I , \,,1 , I \
\ 69
49
29
f
, l
\ '.
.r"~"'h..,.l<o.",.
/ ........... "' ...... .......,. t' "'-.. .. ,. I t _, \. l
'·f ,.
.'''. j " r '-.. ,,/\ '\ I II I
1,1 ,.. 'v.~"'" \ I \
~ " ' -...... ,J \.....//" ........ \ ..
.......... ". " ........ ,..... . ..... " ....... .. ~.. .. ..... ,.. "lOr .. t'
-"....... "'''~, "rJ#r \,,,'
.' -'" ....... " ,.' ~... .."
0\ I I I I I I I I I Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Ha~ Ap~ Hay Jun
MONTHS
~49
~29
:199
80
69
49
29
PAROLE COMMISSION LOCAL JAIL HEARINGS
FISCAL YEAR .1986
.. JAIL HEARINGS FY86
.. JAIL APPROVED FY86
- JAIL REFUSED FY86
55
I I I
'---____ J
."" '.fI ..... rr'k I ... ,,\
• \ I ~ '\ I I , 'L l'., ..•••••• ,\
, I, "J "'"
j '\ II -" I /' ,,' \ I \ " " /,- ,,'
I ,I \ "
\ ,It "
,f \ ,,'
,_. ' __ '"', ~"""""', \ /1
\ ~.. I ' ....... \.L I /~~
\ /, • .r \ I /' ,/'" ...... \ "./' • \ j /' . ...-" .. -.~ .. , • \ " .I V " '. • I t "'II / I" ,. __ • _____ .... ,I lit, \ /
•....... ,;' ••... V.l " .... 0- •••••••••••••• , ••• ' ••••
........... "'" .................. .
91 I I I I I I I I I I I Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan. Feb Ma~ Ap~ May dun
MONTHS
H E A
~5C11.,(
~25
PAROLE COMMISSION REUOCATION HEARINGS
FISCAL YEAR ~985
,., ~~HgCAT ION HEARl NGS
", PAROLES CONT I1~UED FY85
- PAROLES REUOHED FY85
u,e '\ '. I '" '" I " "'. ... , '" 1 ......... I 'I
'..... I,
R 75 It
'I ." I I, I " \ I, 'I' "'" I , ~ \ / \ / "",l ~~\ G
S
59
25
\. Il i / v' II .. 1/ \ j
\ .r--......~ Ii f
\ I \ 1,1 I \ / \ I V \ /
\ / \/
\
.......... . .................. . ........ ....... .. ....
......... ,. ...... ,.. "." ., ........................ ..
... , .. " ..,,, "III .... '" ",
IIo ............... ..
C1I I! I I I I I I I I I Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Ma~ Ap~ May Jun
MONTHS
~59
~25
~99
75
50
PAROLE COMMISSION REUOCATION HEARINGS
FISCAL YEAR ~986
.. '~H~CATION HEARINGS
.. PAROLES CONTINUED FY86
- PAROLES REUOHED FV86
I i
56
t I I I
I !
I ! " I " " . I' \ I I l
" II I; ....... ,,\ I \ I f ,............... ....., 1 I,
.. ""', 1 I i "" .... Ii.. " I \.I,.,'/'~---v\\ /f\ \/// \'1/ \
............ .j \~ ....... . I ... " . ,'..... ..,0. .... ................ . .. ' .......•.
2 .... • ••••• ...-...... -................ ... " . '
" ...... _-_ .................... " ... .
011--~--~-+--~--~~--~~~~~~~, Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Ma~ Ap~ May Jun
MONTHS
57
~CDOCAC F8b PAROLE COMMISSION (DOC RELATED) ACTIVITY
Fisca.:l. yea.. .... :1.986
July Aug. Sept.. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. March April May June Total Averagei' DOC Parole Hearings
Heard 455 409 452 il62 559 40l il73 396 280 806 370 iliI5 5,008 417 Approved 181 125 117 184 96 130 129 89 91 87 113 162 1,404 117
Re-Fused 137 101 108 128 17i1 83 132 102 59 52 91 117 1,284 107 Reheard 129 130 161 li16 199 183 150 137 97 114 114 115 1,625 HIS
Held* 58 53 66 5i1 90 55 62 68 83 53 52 51 695 58
PAROLE COMMISSION (DOC RELATED) ACTIVITY
Fis=a.l Yea.r 1985
July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. March April Hay June Tot.al Average. DOC Parole Hearings
Heard 576 397 370 616 5L13 612 46L1 566 535 641 633 455 6,40B 534 Approved 137 119 82 118 98 144 118 127 131 159 125 ·114 1,467 122
Refused 215 91 103 166 149 177 116 164 145 212 213 154 1,905 159 Reheard 14i1 142 136 226 208 169 165 179 166 180 200 135 2,050 171
Held* 80 45 49 111 88 122 65 96 93 90 95 52 986 82
*These are cases where necessary in-Foreation -For making a -Final decision was not available at t.he t.ime o-F t.he hearing. 4Due to rounding, the sua o-F the individual averages Day not equal the total average.
58
PAROLE COMMISSION (JAIL RELATED) ACTIVITY
F:i.s~a.l Y~a..r 1986
July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. March April HalJ June Total Average'" Jail Parole Hearings
Heard 81 72 4Q 57 79 76 29 48 59 69 70 64 753 63 Approved 24 24 16 17 32 22 11 11 19 18 23 17 234 20
Refused 44 45 28 36 42 46 18 33 34 43 38 38 445 37 Reheard 11 0 3 1 2 2 0 2 1 2 3 5 32 3
Held* 2 3 2 3 3 6 0 2 5 6 6 4 42 4
PAROLE COMMISSION (JAIL RELATED) ACTIVITY
F:i.s~a..l Y~a..r 1985
July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. March April May June Tot-al Average. Jail Parole Hearings
Heard 97 65 78 76 73 74 44 83 76 90 63 73 892 H Approved 17 21 13 17 22 27 10 21 22 29 21 22 242 20
Refused 69 38 54 50 45 39 30 56 46 53 36 42 558 47 Reheard 3 5 6 3 2 4 3 1 7 5 0 0 39 3
Held* 8 . 5 6 4 4 1 5 1 3 6 9 ... 53 4
*These are cases where necessary inforaation for making a final decision was no1. available a1. the time of the hearing. *Due 1.0 rounding, t.he SUB of t.he individual averages Bay not equal the t01.al average.
REVOCATION HEARINGS Tot.al Hearings
Continued New Offense Cont.inued Technical Cont.inued Sub-Tot.al
Revoke New Offense Revoke Tech~ical Revoke Sub-Total
Held* Closed Adainistrat.ively
REVOCATION HEARINGS Tot.al Hearings
Cont.inued New Offense Continued Technical Continued Sub-Total
Revoke New Offense Revoke Technical Revoke Sub-Total
Held* Closed Administratively
July
67 8
b 14
37 4
41
2 10
July
lOB 7
12 19
70 16 86
1
2
Aug.
56 9 4
13
29 5
34
8 6
Aug.
98 15
8 18
78 3
76
o 4
PAROLE COMMISSION REVOCATION ACTIVITY
Sept.
71 5 4 9
46 8
54
1 7
Oct.
69 13
3 16
88 11 49
o 4
Nov.
70 10
4 14
46 2
48
o 8
Fis~~1 Y~~r 1986
Dec.
63 16
4 20
86 1
37
o 6
Jan.
7B 12
5 17
47 3
50
2 9
Feb.
21 4 6
10
8
1 9
:> 2
March
71 11
6
17
41 7
48
2 4
April
36 7 5
12
15 4
19
2 3
Hay
67 15
4 19
38 1
89
1 8
June
110 8
12 20
72 9
81
o 9
PAROLE COMMISSION REVOCATION ACTIVITY
Sept.
66 8 5
18
44 8
47
o 6
Oct.
8B 12
7 1.9
54 10 64
2 8
Nov.
91 19
5 24
52 7
59
o 8
FISCAL YEAR 1985
Dec.
93 14
7
21
54 4
58
2 12
Jan.
49 10
8 18
25 6
81
1 4
Feb.
7B 7 8
15
45 11 56
o 7
March
68 11
7 18
48
4 47
o 8
April
97 9
13 22
56 11 67
1 7
May
B4 10
3 13
61 5
66
1
4
June
55 6 5
11
37 4
41
o 8
~The5e are cases where necessary information for oaking a final decision was not available at the tioe of t.he hearing. **Due to rounding, the sum of the individual averages say not. equal t.he t.otal average.
59
Total Average**
779 11B
63 1Bl
453 56
509
13 76
65 10
5 15
3B 5
42
1
6
Total Average**
975 12B
7B 206
614 B4
69B
B 63
Bl 11
7 17
51
7 5B
1 5
C'
·10
""
PATUXENT INSTITUTION
Data Sources
The information contained in the Patuxent Institution section IS based u~on data from a combination of manual aftd automated information systems that are summarized by the Office -D{ Research and Statistics. The data on Average Monthly PopulatIon; Institutional ActIVity, and Discharges is manually compiled by tho Patuxent Office of Research and EvaluatIon based upon Internal instl tution reports (see tables at pages 61 and 6lL The In!llates CharacterIstics Report (see tables at pages 43 thru 49 of this publication) is based .almost entirely upon data from the Offende~ Based State Correcti.onal Information System (6BSClS I), The onl~ excep-t ion Is that the manual populatIon data is used In the Sex Distribution table, at p a g e4 3 of this pub I i c atlon, to allow comparisons to be made between the actual population and the computerized count for Patuxent.
Recent Trends
During FY 1986, the Patuxent Institution average monthly total populallon decreased to 600, which represents less than a 0.4% decrease from the corresponding FY 1985 average CFY 19B6 - 600; FY 1985 - 602). The average for the population 01 resident eligible persons increased by 51 ightly more than 1.0% over the corresponding average for the prior fiscal year CFY 1986 - 468; FY 1985 - 462). The totll number of Patuxent inmates Under parole supervision In the community ranged from 75 to 91 during this fiscal year with an average of 84 for the period. InFY 1986 the average for ·Patuxent parolees under superVision In the cOmlIiunity increased by 9_1% over the corresponding average for prior fiscal year CFY 1986 - 84; FY 1985 - 77). The DOC Housed Inmates category, which- represents those DOC inmates who ~re temporarIly housed at Patuxent but are not currently under evaluation for admiSSion to Patuxent's program, decreased from an average of 128 during FY 1985 to an average of 83 during FY 1986 (see Section I of tables at pages 61 and 62l.
The total Intake to Patuxent Institution during FY 1986 has increased by 17.6% to 368 as compared to sir. in FY 1985. Discharges* durIng thIs period grew from a total of 313 In FY 1985 to 356 in FY 1986 or an Increase of 13.7%. No escapes occurred during eltheJ FY 1985 or FY 1986 (see SectIon IV of the tables at pages 61 and 62.) The Inmate CharacterIstics of the Patuxent populatIon as of the end of FY 1986 were relatively unchanged frbm the end of FY 1985. [See tables at pages 43 thru 49). ~
*It should be noted that the discharge data IS limited to the reSidentIal population and does not include release of inmates to the communIty after parole to the halfway house.
\;)
G'1
,':.1
I. AVERAGE MONTHLY POPULATION A. IN RESIDENCE
UNDER EVALUATION COMMITTED AS rLIGIBLE PERSON TOTAL
B. ON PAROLE OR WORK/SCHOOL RELEASE HALFWAY HOUSE** IN HIE COMMUNITY TOTAL
C. DOC HOUSED INMATES
II. INSTITUTIONAL ACTIVITY A. INTAJ<E
NEW ADMISSION RETURNED FROM ESCAPE RETURNED FROM LEAVE. WORK OR
SCHOOL RELEASE VIOLATION RETURNED FROM PAROLE VIOLATION RETURNED FROM OTHER TEMPORARY
CUSTODY TOTAL INTAKE
III. EVALUATION ACTIVITY ELIGIBLE PERSONS NOT ELIGIBLE
IV. OEiCHARGES TRANSFERRED NOT ELIGIBLE RELEASED AT SENTENCE EXPIRATION PAROLED TO HALFWAY HOUSE PAROLED TO COMMUNITY ESCAPED FROM INSIDE INSTITUTION ESCAPED FROM OUTSIDE INSTITUTION LEp_VE VIOLATOR WORK/SCHOOL HALFWAY HOUSE OTHER TOTAL
JUL.
117 482 599
23 75 98
97
27 o
o 2
o 29
7 15
26 o o 1
o o o 3 1
a1
AUG.
110 489 599
28 76 99
101
23 o
1 8
1 28
8 81
24 o o 1
o o o 1 2
28
SEP.
111 481 592
22 76 98
97
24 o
o o
o 24
4 14
24 o o 1
o o o 6 o
31
PATUXENT INSTITUTION (FISCAL YEAR 1986)
OCL
110 476 586
24 82
106
100
27 o
o 1
o 28
7 19
28 2 o 1
o o o 4 o
35
NOV.
117 468 585
24 84
108
91
22 o
o 2
2 26
4 15
22 o o o o o o 2 2
26
DEC.
132 465 597
25 87
112
76
39 o
o o
o a9
6 8
28 o o o o o o 4 o
27
JAN.
147 460 607
28 87
110
63
31 o
2 2
o a5
3 22
24 o o o o o o 1 o
25
FEB.
146 459 605
24 87
111
63
24 o
1 2
o 27
8 27
24 o o o o o o 4 1
29
MAR.
155 450 605
24 85
109
75
27 o
1 1
1 30
5 23
25 o o o o o o 2 8
30
*DUE TO ROUNDING. THE SUM OF THE INDIVIDUAL AVERAGES DOESN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGES. **THIS CATAGORY INCLUDES PERSONS ON PAROLE OR WORK/SCHOOL RELEASE AT THE HALFWAY HOUSE.
APR.
146 455 601
25 89
11.4
75
32 o
o 2
o 34
9 24
81 1 o o o o o 6 o
as
MAY JUNE TOTAL AVERAGE*
142 465 607
25 87
112
62
29 o
o 2
o a1
11 11
22 o o 1
o o o o 2
25
149 464 613
24 91
115
90
32 o
2 2
1 37
6 16
23 2 o 1
o o o 5 o
31
337 o
7 19
5 368
78 220
296 5 o 6
o o o
3S 11
356
132 468 600
24 84
108
8a
28 o
1 2
o 31
7 18
25 o o 1
o o o 3 1
30
"
\! ~
6J.
I. AVERAGE MONTHLY POPULATION A. IN RESIDENCE
UNDER EVALUATION COMMITTED AS ELIGIBLE PEP.SON TOTAL
B. ON PAROLE OR WOP.K/SCHOOL RELEASE HALFWAY HOUSE** IN THE COMMUNITY TOTAL
C. DOC HOUSED INMATES
II. INSTITUTIONAL ACTIVITY A. lNTAKE
NEW ADMISSION ReTURNED FROM ESCAPE RETUP.NED FROM LEAI)E. WOP.K 01=:
SCHOOL RELEASE VIOLATION RETURNED FROM PAROLE V~OLATION RETURNED FROM OTHER TEMPORARY
CUSTODY TOTAL INTAKE
IT1. EVALUATION ACTIVITY ELIGIBLE PERSONS NOT ELIGI8LE
IV. DISCHARGES TRANSFERRED NOT ELIGIBLE RELEASED AT SENTENCE EXPIRATION PAROLED TO HALFWAY HOUSE PAROLED TO COMMUNITY ESCAPED FROM INSIDE INSTITUTION ESCAPED FROM OUTSIDE INSTITUTION LEAVE VIOLATOR WORK/SCHOOL HALFW~Y HOUSE C'TI-fER TOTAL
JUL.
150 455 605
7 77 84
172
30 o
1 5
o 36
6 9
31 o o o o o o 3-o
32
AUG.
163 428 601
6 81 87
165
20 o
o 1
o 21
6 18
19 o 2 2 o o D 2 o
25
SEP.
139 464 603
5 83 88
165
16 o
o 2
o 18
7 10
16 o o (j
o o {\
o o
16
PATUXENT INSTITUTION (FISCAL YEAR 1985)
OCT.
189 464 603
6 80 86
168
20 o
2 3
i 26
6 16
20 1 o o o o o 5 o
26
NOV.
140 462 602
7 79 86
162
16 o
1 1
o 18
9 16
16 o o 1 o o o 2 o
19
DEC.
142 464 606
7 77 811
125
25 o
2 8
o 30
3 9
24 o o o o o o 2 o
26
JAN.
129 461 590
21 77 99
111
18 o
1 o
o 19
9 17
81 1 o 2 o o o 1 o
35
FEB.
140 468 603
18 78 96
98
81 o
o 2
o 33
4 12
19 1 o o o o o 1 o
21
HAR.
185 466 601
22 75 97
94
28 o
o 4
o 27
10 15
28 o 1 1 o o o 8 o
28
~DUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF THE INDIVIDUAL AVERAGES DOESN'T NECESSARILY EQUAL THE TOTAL AVERAGES. **THIS CATAGORY INCLUDES PERSONS ON PAROLE OR WORK/SCHOOL RELEASE AT THE HALFWAY HOUSE.
APR.
189 464 608
21 75 96
98
20 o
1 '3
1 25
9 21
19 o o 1 o o o 3 o
23
HAY JUNE TOTAL AVtRAGE*
129 476 605
21 74 95
94
29 o
1 8
1 311
8 24
28 o o 1 o o o 3 o
32
182 470 602
24 78 97
96
24 o
2 o
o 26
a 22
24 o 8 1 o o o 2 o
30
272 o
11 27
3 313
80 189
270 3 6 9 o o o
25 o
313
140 462 602
14 77 91
128
23 t>
1 2
o 26
7 16
28 o 1 1 o o o 2 o
26
62
