DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

35
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa Presentation to SANAC Technical Task Team: Treatment, Care & Support Health Sector Impacts of HIV/AIDS: Key Issues for Planning Martin Hensher Directorate: Health Financing & Economics

description

Presentation to SANAC Technical Task Team: Treatment, Care & Support Health Sector Impacts of HIV/AIDS: Key Issues for Planning Martin Hensher Directorate: Health Financing & Economics. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa. Presentation Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Page 1: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHRepublic of South Africa

Presentation to SANAC Technical Task Team: Treatment, Care & Support

Health Sector Impacts of HIV/AIDS:Key Issues for Planning

Martin HensherDirectorate: Health Financing & Economics

Page 2: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHRepublic of South Africa

Presentation Objectives

• To summarise key results of the recent Abt Associates Health Sector Impact Study

• To discuss strengths and limitations of the study

• To identify key resource issues of relevance to the workshop discussion

Page 3: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHRepublic of South Africa

Impact Study - Background

• Abt Associates commissioned by DoH with World Bank funding

• Project overseen by DoH Steering Committee

• Report “The Impact of the HIV Epidemic on the Health Sector in South Africa” delivered in November 2000

Page 4: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHRepublic of South Africa

Status of Report

• Presented at various DoH fora• Considerable internal discussion• Not yet a public document• Presentation contents should not be

regarded as reflecting official DoH policy

Page 5: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHRepublic of South Africa

Study Methods - Overview

• Synthesises multiple data sources to develop several models

• Core provided by Doyle model of epidemic

• No primary data collection, all estimates generated from existing sources

Page 6: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHRepublic of South Africa

Main Limitations

• Heavy reliance on a few data points, especially for costs of care – some of which are open to question

• Heavy use of (strong) assumptions• Projection forwards of “current practice”

is not sustainable or realistic – but gives an outer limit to cost projections

Page 7: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHRepublic of South Africa

Main Strengths

• Successfully assembled more relevant data in one place in a workable form than anyone else to date

• Based on a generally respected epidemiological model

• The only show in town until we have much stronger primary research

Page 8: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

ObjectivesProject the likely course of the epidemic, and

its impact on the South African population, divided into populations depending on public and private health care services.

Estimate the likely increase in health service utilisation, and the costs associated with this.

Estimate total expenditure requirements until 2010

Estimate the impact that the epidemic will have on employees in the public health sector.

Page 9: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Epidemic Projection Assumptions

Most up to date Doyle simulation model Model has been extensively used for other

impact assessments in South Africa Base populations for public and private

sectors taken from 1995 October Household Survey and projected until 2010

Assumes that there will be little cross-over between public and private sector membership and mid case scenario

The Doyle model produces conservative estimates of the course of the epidemic

Page 10: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

HIV PREVALENCE: ADULTS 20-64

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

BestCase

MiddleCase

WorstCase

Page 11: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

ADULT HIV PREVALENCE BY MEDICAL AID STATUS (Mid Case)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

NoMedicalAid

MedicalAid

Page 12: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

AIDS CASES 1995-2010 (Best and Worst Scenarios)

0100,000200,000300,000400,000500,000600,000700,000800,000900,000

1,000,000

Best Case Worst Case

Page 13: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

AIDS AND NON-AIDS DEATHS IN ADULTS

050,000

100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000400,000450,000500,000

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Non AIDS DeathsAIDS Deaths

Page 14: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

CUMULATIVE AIDS DEATHS IN ADULTS

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Cumulative AIDS deaths

Page 15: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Public Sector Utilisation data– Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital and three

mine hospitals (average taken)– Extracted by approximate WHO clinical stage

of disease– Removed chronic TB care, and all

occupationally compensatable TB care – Utilisation measured in terms of acute inpatient

days, ambulatory visits, and full courses of TB therapy

– Calculated separately for children and adults

Page 16: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

No data on HIV-related utilisation in the private sector

Used Johannesburg Hospital data (1989-1996) as best available proxy

Same units of utilisation used as for public sector data

Private Sector Utilisation Data

Page 17: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Expected number of HIV-related admissions by year and age category

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Adm

issi

ons

Children

Adults

Page 18: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

HIV related acute bed-days, ambulatory attendances and days of DOTS required in the public sector by year.

0

5000000

10000000

15000000

20000000

25000000

30000000

35000000

40000000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Bed-days

Ambulatory att.

Days of DOTS

Page 19: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Public Sector HIV Expenditure

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Expe

nditu

re (R

mill

)

Inpatient adult Ambulatory adultChronic TB adult Children

Page 20: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Total Public Expenditure

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

50000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Cos

ts R

' mill

HIV-associated diseaseNon-HIV associated illness

Page 21: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Total Private Expenditure

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000C

osts

R'm

ill

HIV associated diseasenon-HIV associated illness

Page 22: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Impact of substitutes for in and outpatient hospital care on HIV-related expenditure requirements.

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

HIV

-rel

ated

exp

(R m

ill)

Base* 50% hospice

PHC clinic Home based care

Page 23: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Price Reductions for HAART

* Base case is without HAART

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Exp

endi

ture

(R m

ill)

Base* 100% 75%50% 25% 10%

Page 24: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Ran

d (M

illio

ns)

$600 ppa$350 ppa

Costs of Generic HAART – Current Offer

Page 25: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Predicted annual costs of MTCT prevention, INH and cotrimoxazole prophylaxis.

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

R m

ill

Cotrim

INHMTCT

MTCT net

Page 26: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Conclusions (1) Largest impact will be on acute public hospital

inpatient facilities under current mode of care Projected impacts on the private sector are

significant, but no reason to predict the demise of the industry. If anything they support the Government view that this sector can and should bear its share of the weight of the epidemic.

Tuberculosis is the largest cause of admission, and uses a disproportionate number of acute bed days – Rationalising and improving the effectiveness of TB

care will be critical to reducing the impact of HIV

Page 27: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Conclusions (2) Regarding antiretrovirals:

– Vertical transmission prevention strategies warrant introduction because they are cost effective, not because they would have massive impact reduction potential

– HAART may be cost-effective in certain contexts, but affordability problems are likely to prevent it being introduced to the public sector. Affordability would not seem to be a significant problem in the private sector assuming they have access to discounts.

Page 28: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Conclusions (3) Equity implications

– The already strained public sector (and its users) will bear most of the health sector impact of HIV/AIDS. This is likely to increase

– Private/public sector differential spending on health care will increase from 4 to 6 fold

– Battle is to maintain status quo, let alone righting the balance

– Equity between provinces may be affected

Page 29: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Conclusions (4) Rationing of care to HIV infected individuals is

inevitable Critical to direct rationing imperatives towards

more cost-effective and appropriate forms of care This will require an extensive capital investment

programme in terms of facilities and training of health care workers willing to undertake this task

Page 30: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Projected HIV infection levels in the Health Sector

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Best case Mid caseWorst case

Page 31: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Projected HIV infection levels in the Health Sector by Job Category (middle scenario)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Dentists

Doctors

Therapists

ProfNurses

StudentNurses

NursingAssistantsStaffNurses

Pharms

Page 32: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

CUMULATIVE AIDS DEATHS AMONG HEALTH SECTOR EMPLOYEES (mid case)

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Cumulative AIDS Deaths

Page 33: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

STAFF IMPACT Conclusions (1)

– The HIV epidemic will be the biggest challenge facing HR management in the health sector over the next decade.

– The DPSA is planning around general labour issues, including benefits, BUT:

– The Department needs to plan programmes at a provincial, district and institutional level.

– All managers will need to become proficient in HR issues

Page 34: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

STAFF IMPACT Conclusions (2)

– Aggregated data may hide devastating impacts at a local level.

– Vulnerable institutions and work processes should be identified for special attention.

– The Department needs to make staff aware of their risk outside the wards, as well as inside.

– An environment needs to be created where PLWHA (patients AND staff) are treated with respect and care.

Page 35: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Republic of South Africa

Treasury Projected Real Public Health Spending vs. Abt Model Projections

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10

Ran

d (B

illio

ns)

Calculated Real Health ABT Associates Projections