Department of English and Foreign Languages School of Liberal Arts B.A. in English Education CIP...
-
Upload
derek-brooks -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Department of English and Foreign Languages School of Liberal Arts B.A. in English Education CIP...
Department of English and Foreign Languages
School of Liberal Arts
B.A. in English EducationCIP Code 13.1203Program Code 125
1Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011
Student-Learning Outcomes1. Students will demonstrate knowledge of, and skills in the use of, the English language (NCTE).2. Students will demonstrate knowledge of the practices of oral, visual, and written literacy (NCTE).3. Students will demonstrate knowledge of reading processes (NCTE).4. Students will demonstrate knowledge of different composing processes (NCTE).5. Students will demonstrate knowledge of, and uses for, an extensive range of literature (NCTE).6. Students will demonstrate knowledge of the range and influences of print and non-print media and technology in contemporary culture (NCTE).7. Students will demonstrate knowledge of research theory and findings in English language arts (NCTE).8. Students will demonstrate effective computer literacy.9. Students will adopt and strengthen professional attitudes needed by English language arts teachers (NCTE).10. Students will acquire the disposition and skills needed to integrate knowledge
of English language arts, students, and teaching (NCTE).
2Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011
Program goals and objectivesAlignment with Mission and Strategic Plan
• University Mission Statement• Prepares students for professional success;• Diversity;• Regional Development
• School of Liberal Arts Mission Statement• Student centered academic environment;• Partnership with the community
• Department of English and Foreign Languages Mission Statement• Exposure to a broad array of studies;• Development of individual critical and analytical capacities
• Plan 2013• Personal Growth• Community Leadership• Diversity
3Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011
Measures of Learning Outcomes
Measurement Type Objectives
Oklahoma Subject Area Test Direct 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Major Portfolio Direct 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Unit Plan Direct 9, 10
Student Teaching Report Direct 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10
Teacher Work Sample Direct 9, 10
Residency Year Follow-up Survey
Direct 9, 10
Literary History Exam Direct 1, 5
Student Essay Response Direct 1, 4, 7
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 4
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 5
Actions taken on previously chosen priority outcomes
Objective 5: Students will demonstrate knowledge of, and uses for, an extensive range of literature.
Review sessions for students taking Oklahoma Subject Area Test;
Comprehensive review added to ENGL 4773, Teaching of English;
No data yet available.
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 6
Actions taken on previously chosen priority outcomes
Objective 7: Students will demonstrate knowledge of research theory and findings in English language arts.
Follow up with public school mentor teachers and continue to monitor data collection;
Continue to work with the teacher education council to improve delivery of secondary education pedagogy.
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 7
Actions taken on previously chosen priority outcomes
Objective 10: Students will acquire the disposition and skills needed to integrate knowledge of English language arts, students, and teaching.
Follow up with public school mentor teachers and continue to monitor data collection;
Continue to work with the teacher education council to improve delivery of secondary education pedagogy.
Outcome 2
PROGRAM OUTCOME
CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE
MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING OR SERVICE OUTCOME
Measurements
Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments
Methods used to determine reliability of measurements
Schedule for measurements
Students will demonstrate knowledge of the practices of oral, visual, and written literacy (NCTE)
Upper Division Literature courses
Upper Division Literature courses
Student Teaching Semester
OSAT (direct)
Major Portfolio (direct)
Student Teaching Report (direct)
Competencies aligned with objectives
Students articulate alignment of artifact with objective
NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric
State Test
Inter-rater reliability
Inter-rater reliability
Each semester
Annually
Each semester
88Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011
Outcome 2Portfolio Data
Objective 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.5 Average
Student 1 5 5 3 3 4
Student 2 5 5 3 3 4
Student 3 5 5 3 3 4
Student 4 5 5 3 3 4
Student 5 5 5 3 3 4
Average 5 5 3 3 4
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 9
Outcome 2Analysis
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 10
• Insufficient data available for comparison
Outcome 2Action Plan
• Continue to collect data and measure outcomes.
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 11
Outcome 5
PROGRAM OUTCOME
CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE
MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING OR SERVICE OUTCOME
Measurements
Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments
Methods used to determine reliability of measurements
Schedule for measurements
Students will demonstrate knowledge of, and uses for, an extensive range of literature
Upper division literature courses
Upper division literature courses
ENGL 4773
Student teaching semester
OSAT (direct)
Major Portfolio (direct)
Unit Plan (direct)
Student Teaching Report (direct)
Competencies aligned with objectives
Students articulate alignment of artifact with objective
NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric
NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric
State Test
Inter-rater reliability
Inter-rater reliability
Inter-rater reliability
Each semester
Annually
Each semester
Each semester
1212Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011
Outcome 5Portfolio Data
Objective 5.1 5.2 5.4 Average
Student 1 5 5 3 4.3
Student 2 3 3 3 3
Student 3 3 3 3 3
Student 4 3 3 3 3
Student 5 3 3 3 3
Student 6 3 3 3 3
Student 7 3 3 3 3
Student 8 3 3 3 3
Student 9 3 3 3 3
Student 10 3 3 3 3
Average 3.2 3.2 3 3.13
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 13
Outcome 5Analysis
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 14
• Insufficient data available for comparison
Outcome 5Action Plan
• Continue collecting data and measuring outcomes.
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 15
Outcome 9
PROGRAM OUTCOME
CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE
MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING OR SERVICE OUTCOME
Measurements
Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments
Methods used to determine reliability of measurements
Schedule for measurements
Students will adopt and strengthen professional attitudes needed by English language arts teachers
ENGL 4773
Student Teaching semester
Practicum and Assessment course
Program Graduates
Unit Plan
Student Teaching Report
Teacher Work Sample
Residency Year Follow-up survey
NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric
NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric
NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric
NCATE Aligned Scoring Rubric
Inter-rater reliability
Inter-rater reliability
Inter-rater reliability
Inter-rater reliability
Each semester
Each semester
Annually
Annually
1616Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011
Outcome 9Residency Year Follow-up Data
Objective Student 1
Administrator Mentor University Average
9.1 3 3 3 3
9.2 3 3 3 3
9.3 3 3 3 3
9.4 3 3 3 3
9.5 3 3 3 3
9.6 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 17
Outcome 9Analysis
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 18
• Insufficient data available for comparison
Outcome 9Action Plan
• Continue collecting data as more students complete the program.
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 19
Ancillary Actions
• Arrange Chalk and wire training for faculty members.
20Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011
Published information on graduates
21
Academic Year 09-10 Entered Graduate School Working In Discipline Other
Summer 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010 1
Total 1
Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011