Department of Agrarian Reform - WE PROTECT · 2012. 5. 8. · Review DARAB Rules of Procedure for...
Transcript of Department of Agrarian Reform - WE PROTECT · 2012. 5. 8. · Review DARAB Rules of Procedure for...
Department of Agrarian Reform
Integrity Development Review 2007AG Presentation
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
DAR Assessment Team
Team Leader ALAN S. CAJES
Deputy Team Leader RONALD DOCTOR
Members: LOURDES BORROMEO DANIEL EBOÑA ONOFRE Q. LECITONA, JR.ELMER BEN V. PASION BLESILDA PILAR Z. SERVANDO RICKY PARAS SUNGASHIELA C. TIANGCO
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
D1. Leadership
30-40%70-80%70-80%Deployment1
2223Agency Rating
IDR TeamXIVIIIICODimension
Areas for Improvement
• The Executive Committee and the Management Committee at the Central and Regional offices should formulate a clear policyto discourage employees from engaging in corruption and unethical behavior
• Concerned Officials should undergo trainings in the area of corruption prevention and detection
• Officials should practice leadership by example• Top leaders must express their political will against corruption
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
D2. Code of Conduct
10-20%90-100%90-100%90-100%Deployment 11111Agency Rating
IDR TeamXIVIIIICODimension
Areas for Improvement
• Adopt an Agency Code of Conduct that includes a control on conflict of interest and post employment; should be deployed to all officials and employees through continuous orientation programs
• Conduct integrity tests and develop willingness to initiate disciplinary proceedings
• Set up a public and internal complaint management system
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
D3. Gifts & Benefits Policy
0000Deployment 00000Agency Rating
Team RatingXIVIIIICODimension
Areas for Improvement
� Although there are statements to the effect that the provisions
of Republic Act No. 6713 on Solicitation or Acceptance of gifts
is adopted, the agency has no written policy on solicitation and
acceptance of gifts that is consistent with RA 6713 and RA
3019
� The agency also has no written policy on offers of bribes and
written guidelines on donations.
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
D4. Human Resource Management
50-60%50-60%90-100%90-100%Deployment 33333Agency Rating
IDR TeamXIVIIIICODimension
Areas for Improvement
• Include measures of integrity in recruitment and promotion processes
• Practice transparency to ensure that the HR process is not perceived as
subject to undue influence
• Update the Job Description of employees in accordance with actual job
performance
• Formulate a post employment policy for retiring and resigning personnel
• Make supervisors accountable for integrity performance of subordinates
• Adopt a policy on conflict of interest
• Monitor quality of staff lifestyle
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
D5. Performance Management
30-40%90-100%90-100%90-100%Deployment 22332Agency Rating
IDR TeamXIVIIIICODimension
Areas for Improvement
• Formulate a policy on sanctions for poor performance
and negligence of duty that can be uniformly
deployed to all levels
• Analyze agency/individual performance in relation to
the incidence of corruption in the agency
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
D6. Procurement Management
50-60%50-60%50-60%50-60%Deployment 10331Agency Rating
IDR TeamXIVIIIICODimension
Areas for Improvement
• Strict compliance to R.A. 9184 & IRR• Employ public bidding as the primary mode of procurement (resorting to alternative mode of procurement should be the last option based on set conditions)
• Prepare a Workable/Feasible Annual Procurement Plan & make use of the Approved Budget for procurement
• All purchases made by the GSD must be based on the APP• Ensure that invited observers attend BAC proceedings• Train BAC Members, BAC Secretariat, TWG, Procurement Units (GSD), etc. on R.A. 9184
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
D7. Financial Management
50-60%70-80%90-100%70-80%Deployment 23332Agency Rating
IDR TeamXIVIIIICODimension
Areas for Improvement• Financial statements and COA audit findings must be used to assist and
enhance decision-making e.g., Value for Money Audit findings of foreign
assisted projects and unliquidated cash advances;
• Strictly enforce budgeting and accounting policies and guidelines
specifically on unliquidated cash advances;
• Conduct audit and provide full audit trail on major financial transactions
• Institutionalize random/spot audits on transactions
• Ensure that a corruption resistance system is integrated in all its financial
processes
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
D8. Whistleblowing, Internal
Reporting & Investigation
0000Deployment 00000Agency Rating
IDR TeamXIVIIIICODimension
Areas for Improvement� Come up with a written policy on whistle blowing or internal reporting
� Formulate policy and procedure to protect the confidentiality ofwhistleblowers
� Build a culture of reporting corrupt practices involving officers, employees and stakeholders
� Train relevant personnel in handling & investigating corruption
� Train all personnel on how to report incidents of corruption & unethical behavior
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
D9. Corruption Risk Management
10-20%30-40%30-40%Deployment 11101Agency Rating
IDR TeamXIVIIIICODimension
Areas for Improvement
• Proactively undertake an assessment of corruption risk areas
• Benchmark with other agencies how to make IAS more effective
especially at the regional levels
• Identify all risk areas including risk profiles of all work units (extended
CVA)
• Senior leaders to express political will in addressing IAS Audit Findings
and Recommendations (Anti-corruption champions at the CO, DARRO
and DARPO levels)
• Include Audit findings as inputs to strategic and operational plans and
other agency decisions.
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
D10. Managing Interface
with External Environment
30-40%70-80%90-100%70-80%Deployment 11133Agency Rating
IDR TeamXIVIIIICODimension
Areas for Improvement• Provide a public service area in local offices. • Provide an Officer of the Day to respond to the needs of the transacting public and visitors.
• Install a system where the stakeholders can provide feedback through the use of the text messaging system, email, internet, suggestion boxes, and the like.
• Document complaints and feedbacks from clients, as well as actions to resolve the complaints & or feedbacks
• Launch a public awareness campaign about the agency’s mandates, programs, services, organizational chart and process flows of key services
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
1113310. Interface with External Envi.
111019. Corruption Risk Management
000008. Whistle blowing & Internal Rep.
233327. Financial Management
103316. Procurement Management
223325. Performance Management
333334. Human Resource
Management
000003. Gifts and Benefits Policy
111112. Code of Conduct
112231. Leadership
R11R6R3CO
Validated Team
Rating
IDA Self RatingDimension
Summary of IDA Ratings
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
Risk Map
Process 1. Voluntary Offer to Sell
Significance of Impact
Likelihood of Occurrence
Low High
HighInfluence Peddling
Facilitation for fee
Collusion to increase the Land
Valuation
Loss of Claim Folders
Collusion in the
preparation of the FIR
Intervention of
Landowners in selection of
potential ARBs
Delay in the evaluation and
submission of CF
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
Risk Map
Process 2. Land Use Conversion
Significance of Impact
Likelihood of Occurrence
Low High
High 1. Bribery/extortion in reviewing and
approving application
2. Collusion between MARO and applicant
3. Collusion between applicant and staff;
limited capacity to assess documents
4. Abuse of discretion in assessment of fees
5. Bribery/extortion/collusion of OCI team
6. Bribery/extortion/abuse of RD’s
Selling of LUC forms
Bribery of RCLUPPI Secretariat to
other requirements
Submission of spurious
documents to MARO
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
Process 3. Agrarian Adjudication
High
Significance of Impact
Likelihood of Occurrence
Low High
•Possible collusion to get preferred case
•Intentional loss of claim
folder
•Assigning of preferred case for a fee
Outside influence in rendering
decisions
•Asking for fees from litigants
•Asking for extra fees to serve summons
•Bribery or extortion in drafting decisions
•Collusion between parties and adjudicator in rendering decisions
•Breach of confidentiality in routing decisions
•Collusion, bribery or extortion before issuance of decisions
•Intentional delay in the execution of decision
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
Over-all Recommendations
Structural:
� In addition to IAS, set up a group to conduct performance audit in response to complaints, ensure that systems and procedures are in place and observed, determine possible deviations from performance standards
� Set up information and complaints units in areas where clients transact business with the agency
� Establish an independent DARAB as proposed in the NARAC Bill
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
Over-all RecommendationsPolicy:
� Review and implement the draft Internal Code of Conduct, which should include a policy on solicitation and acceptance of gifts and post employment policy
� Review DARAB Rules of Procedure for possible amendments and include recommendations of local DARAB Offices
� Strictly enforce policy on performance of personnel
� Strict adherence to Annual Procurement Plan
� Formulate and implement a policy on whistle-blowing
� Maintain IAS independence
� Continuous internal marketing of IAS and its functions
� Review EO 405 s.1990 on land valuation
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
Over-all RecommendationsPolicy:
� Formulate and communicate an Anti-Corruption Policy� Top leaders to express political will to combat corruption� Develop anti-corruption champions at all levels� Define conflict of interest� Include integrity as one of bases for recruitment and promotions
� Undertake integrity testing-related activities� Make supervisors accountable for corruption among subordinates
� Conduct of quality lifestyle check (excessive and poverty threshold)
� Promote healthy lifestyle; introduce quality management & performance excellence systems
� Include anti-corruption clause in all contracts
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
Over-all RecommendationsSystems:
� Provide full audit trail on major financial transactions
� Install a comprehensive feedback system
� Incorporate E-Procurement in the agency’s procurement system
Resources:
� Codify all resolved agrarian cases
� Provide appropriate trainings to DAR personnel (BAC, DARAB, BARC, etc.)
� Provide a Public Service Area and Officer of the Day for agency clients
DAR Integrity Development Review 2007
Thank you
for your kind attention.