8/7/2019 DENTINE OCCLUSION FINAL

1/5

OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS

Table No.1: Distribution of samples and groups under study:

Treatment No. of samples

Group 1 CPP-ACP (mousse) 15

Group 2 CPP-ACP + Fl (Mousse plus) 15

Group 3 Novamin 15

Group 4 Novamin+Fl 15

Table No.2: Mean and SD values of percentage occlusion in all four

groups under study:

Treatment Mean SDGroup 1 (n=15) CPP-ACP (mousse) 55.02 10.59

Group 2 (n=15) CPP-ACP + Fl (Mousse plus) 87.85 7.63

Group 3 (n=15) Novamin 99.14 0.06

Group 4 (n=15) Novamin+Fl 99.17 0.08

8/7/2019 DENTINE OCCLUSION FINAL

2/5

Table No.3: Comparison of mean values of percentage occlusion in

Group 1 and Group 3:

Group 1

(n=15)

Group 2

(n=15)

t test

value

p

value

Significance

Mean SD Mean SD

55.02 10.59 99.14 0.06 16.16 p

8/7/2019 DENTINE OCCLUSION FINAL

3/5

Table No.4: Comparison of mean values of percentage occlusion in

Group 1 and Group 4:

Group 1

(n=15)

Group 4

(n=15)

t test

value

p

value

Significance

Mean SD Mean SD

55.02 10.59 99.17 0.08 16.17 p

8/7/2019 DENTINE OCCLUSION FINAL

4/5

Table No.6: Comparison of mean values of percentage occlusion in

Group 3 and Group 4:

Group 2

(n=15)

Group 4

(n=15)

t test

value

p

value

Significance

Mean SD Mean SD

99.14 0.06 99.17 0.08 1.16 p>0.05 Not significant

By applying Students Unpaired t test there is no significant difference

between mean values of percentage occlusion in group 2 and group 4 (i.e.

p>0.05)

Table No. 7: Comparison of mean values of percentage occlusion in

Group 2 and Group 4:

Group 3

(n=15)

Group 4

(n=15)

t test

value

p

value

Significance

Mean SD Mean SD

87.85 7.63 99.17 0.08 5.75 p

8/7/2019 DENTINE OCCLUSION FINAL

5/5

Table No.8: Coefficient of variation for consistency of the groups:

GROUPS TREATMENTS MEAN SD COEFICIENT OF

VARIATION VALUE (%)

Group 1 CPP-ACP

(mousse)

55.02 10.59 19.25%

Group 2 CPP-ACP + Fl(Mousse plus)

87.85 7.63 8.68%

Group 3 Novamin 99.14 0.06 0.06%

Group 4 Novamin+Fl 99.17 0.08 0.081%

From the above table by applying Coefficient of variation technique it isseen that the coefficient of variation (CV) for group 3 (Novamin) is less(0.06%) than Coefficient of variation (CV) of group 4 (Novamin+F1)(0.081%) followed by group 2 (cpp-acp+F1(mousse plus)) (8.68%), andgroup 1 (cpp-acp (mousse)) (19.25%), thus it is concluded that group 3(Novamin) and group 4 (Novamin+F1) is more consistent (reliable) thangroup 2 (cpp-acp+F1(mousse plus)) (8.68%), and group 1 (cpp-acp+F1(mousse)

Thus, present study it is recommended that treatment Novamin andNovamin +F1 is better than other treatment groups under study.