8/7/2019 dentimetria

1/5

EXAM YEAR ABO WRITTEN CASE REPORT Version 2009-2010

ABO ID # CASE#

Mandible (all three planes):

Maxillary Dentition

A-P:

Vertical:

Intermolar Width:

Mandibular Dentition

A-P:

Vertical:

Intermolar / Intercanine Width:

Facial Esthetics:

RETENTION:

FINAL EVALUATION OF TREATMENT:

Page 42010

12345 2 Jane Doe

2,411 characters remaining

No growth was noted, maintained awaiting genioplasty.

Maxillary incisors retracted, some anchorage loss in the posterior, molars advanced 3 mm.

Fair vertical control, slight extrusions at the molars, relative incisor extrusion.

Intermolar width was reduced 2 mm, but intercanine distance was maintained.

The lower incisors retracted with some anchorage loss in the posterior (molars advanced 3 mm).

Relative extrusion of the incisors, none at the molar, and open bite corrected.

Intermolar width was reduced 2 mm, intercanine reduced 1 mm.

Reduced maxillary and mandibular lip proclination, refer for genioplasty to improve chin projection. Slightopening of the nasolabial angle but acceptable.

Upper and lower circumferential Hawley removable retainers were placed. Will place bonded U1-1 if upperdiastema recurs. Patient asked to continue her speech therapy to avoid relapse of the thrust.

Bimaxillary protrusion was corrected. Pt is very happy with result. She is scheduled in Oral Surgery forgenioplasty and extraction of all four third molars. Soft tissue laser results are stable and patient smile isvery pleasing. Given her vertical facial pattern, vertical control was very critical and was achieved byavoiding any molar extrusion.

8/7/2019 dentimetria

2/5

EXAM YEAR ABO DISCREPANCY INDEX Version 2009-2010

ABO ID # CASE# PATIENT NAME

TOTAL D.I. SCORE Examiners will verify measurements in eachparameter.

OVERJET

0 0.9 mm. (edge-to-edge) = 1 pt.

1 3 mm. = 0 pts.

3.1 5 mm. = 2 pts.

5.1 7 mm. = 3 pts.

7.1 9 mm. = 4 pts.

> 9 mm. = 5 pts.

Negative Overjet (x-bite):

1 pt. per mm. per tooth = pts

Total

OVERBITE

0 3 mm. = 0 pts.

3.1 5 mm. = 2 pts.

5.1 7 mm. = 3 pts.

Impinging (100%) = 5 pts

Total

ANTERIOR OPEN BITE

0 mm. (edge-to-edge), 1 pt. per tooth = pts.

then 1 pt. per additional full mm. per tooth = pts.

Total

LATERAL OPEN BITE

2 pts. per mm. per tooth

Total

CROWDING (only one arch)

0 1 mm. = 0 pts.

1.1 3 mm. = 1 pts.

3.1 5 mm. = 2 pts.

5.1 7 mm. = 4 pts.

> 7 mm. = 7 pts.

Total

OCCLUSION

Class I to end on = 0 pts.

End-to-End Class II or III = 2 pts. per side pts.

Full Class II or III = 4 pts per side pts.

Beyond Class II or III = 1 pt. per mm pts.

additional

Total

LINGUAL POSTERIOR X-BITE

1 pt. per tooth Total

BUCCAL POSTERIOR X-BITE

2 pts. per tooth Total

CEPHALOMETRICS (See Instructions)

ANB >6 or < -2 = 4 pts.

Each degree > 6 __ x 1 pt. = __

Each degree < -2 __ x 1 pt. = __

SN-MP

> 38 = 2 pts.

Each degree > 38 __ x 2 pts. = __

99 = 1 pt.

Each degree > 99 __ x 1 pt. = __

Total

OTHER(See Instructions)

Supernumerary teeth __ x 1 pt.. = __

Ankylosis of perm. Teeth __ x 2 pts. = __

Anomalous morphology __ x 2 pts. = __

Impaction (except 3rd molars) __ x 2 pts. = __

Midline discrepancy (>3 mm) @ 2 pts. = __

Missing teeth (except 3rd molars) __ x 1 pt.. = __

Missing teeth, congenital __ x 2 pts. = __

Spacing (4 or more, per arch) __ x 2 pts. = __

Spacing(mx cent diastema > 2 mm) @ 2 pts. = __

Tooth Transposition __ x 2 pts. = __

Skeletal asymmetry(nonsurgical tx) @ 3 pts. = __

Addl. treatment complexities __ x 2 pts. = __Identify:

____________________________________________

____________________________________________

____________________________________________

Total Other

2010

12345 2 Jane Doe

3

54

4

8

0

3

18

33

0

44

8/7/2019 dentimetria

3/5

EXAM YEAR ABO Cast-Radiograph Evaluation Version 2009-2010ABO ID # CASE# PATIENT NAME

Alignment/Rotations

Marginal Ridges

Buccolingual Inclination

Overjet

Total Score:

INSTRUCTIONS: Second molars should be in occlusion. Mark extracted teeth with a check in the bolded box. Place

score beside each deficient tooth.

Page 62010

12345 2 Jane Doe

8

3

1

1

1

2

1 1

0

0

8/7/2019 dentimetria

4/5

EXAM YEAR ABO Cast-Radiograph Evaluation Version 2009-2010ABO ID # CASE# PATIENT NAME

Occlusal Contacts

Occlusal Relationships

Interproximal Contacts

Root Angulation

R

R Buccal Surface L L Lingual Surface R

L

R L

Page 72010

12345 2 Jane Doe

1

1

2

1 1

0

0

8/7/2019 dentimetria

5/5

EXAM YEAR ABO CASE MANAGEMENT FORM Version 2009-2010ABO ID # CASE# PATIENT

SKELETAL ANALYSIS (S) 0-Acceptable 1-Unacceptable

Examiners will evaluate treatment objectives and results,in addition to doing a Records Analysis and Overall Analysis.

MEASUREMENTS SCORINGPRETX

A

PROG

A1

POSTTX

B

DIFF.

|A-B|

EXAMINEE TX OBJECTIVESPRETX

OBJ

POSTTX

RESULTScore

CEPHALOM

ETRIC

SNAA-PMX

01

01

SNBA-PMN

01

01

ANB

SN-MP**VERT

MX01

01

FMAVERT

MN

0

1

0

1

1 TO NA mmA-PMX

01

01

1 TO SN

1 TO NB mm A-PMN

01

01

1 TO MP

VERT01

01

ARCH

6 TO 6 WIDTHTRANS

MX01

01

6 TO 6 WIDTHTRANS

MN01

01

3 TO 3 WIDTHTRANSANT

01

01

CURVE OFSPEE

CURVEOF SPEE

01

01

MANDIBULARARCH FORM

ARCHFORM MN

01

01

E-LINEF A C I A LESTHETICS

01

01

DENTAL ANALYSIS (D)

FACIAL ANALYSIS (F)

Scoring sub-totals for S-D-F

Shaded areas for examiner only.

Page 82010

12345 2 Jane Doe

82 77 5.0

73 68 5.0

9 9 0.0

47 49 2.0

39 39 0.0

Maintain/reduce maxillary position 0

Maintain mandibular position 0

Prevent increase in verticaldimension 1

Prevent increase in vertical

dimension0

6 2 4.0

114 88 26.0

11 10 1.0

104 98 6.0

Maintain upper incisors; achieveClass I molar and canine with normaloverjet and overbite

0

Advance lower incisors; achieve ClassI molar and canine with normaloverjet and overbite

0

Prevent dental extrusion0

32.5 30.5 2.0

30.0 28 2.0

25.5 24.5 1.0

1 0 1.0

OV OV SAME

Increase maxillary transversedimension - resolve crossbite 0

Maintain0

Maintain0

Level0

Maintain0

Upper

Lower

1 0 1.0

3 0 3.0

Maintain facial esthetics0

1