Density by Desire! Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

The Tale of How Arlington Embraced

Transit and Prospered

A Presentation by

Peter L. Bass Development Advisory Services

[email protected]

© Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

Density by Desire!DESIRE !

2

Peter L Bass

Development Advisory Services © Peter L. Bass- 2003-2015

ARLINGTON TIED ITS DESTINY TO TRANSIT (METRO)

•  BACKGROUND AND WHAT’S HAPPENED

•  THE RATIONALE

•  THE TOOLS USED

•  SUCCESSES TO DATE

•  NEW CHALLENGES AND REFINEMENTS •  POSSIBLE LESSONS FOR OTHERS

PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

3

Peter L Bass


BACKGROUND

WHAT IS ARLINGTON?

THE MISSING CORNER OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA!

26 square mile Virginia part of the old “diamond”

“Retrocession” in 1846

Sleepy suburb until coming of Metro in the 1970’s

4

Peter L Bass


ROSSLYN – BALLSTON CORRIDOR

ONE OF FOUR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS IN COUNTY: TYPICAL OF DC AREA

Towards DC Center

1960’S Aerial

5

Peter L Bass


ROSSLYN – BALLSTON CORRIDOR

Developments by 2000

6

Peter L Bass


2002

2014

7

Peter L Bass


APRIL 2014

8

Peter L Bass


MID 2014

9

Peter L Bass


ROSSLYN THEN

10

Peter L Bass


ROSSLYN NOW

11

Peter L Bass


COURT HOUSE THEN

12

Peter L Bass


COURT HOUSE NOW

13

Peter L Bass


CLARENDON THEN

14

Peter L Bass


CLARENDON NOW

15

Peter L Bass


CLARENDON - MID 2014

16

Peter L Bass


CLARENDON 2014

17

Peter L Bass


CLARENDON NOW

Clarendon Market Common

18

Peter L Bass


BALLSTON THEN


19

Peter L Bass


BALLSTON NOW


20

Peter L Bass



SO WHAT HAPPENED?

21

Peter L Bass


THE OPPORTUNITY

COMING OF METRO: PART 1 •  GOT IN EARLY AT BEGINNING

OF THE PLANNING FOR THE SYSTEM

•  DEBATED THE IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT VS THE BENEFITS OF GROWTH AND DECIDED IT WANTED TO ENCOURAGE GROWTH

•  EMBARKED ON AN AMBITIOUS COMMUNITY PLANNING EFFORT

22

Peter L Bass


THE OPPORTUNITY

COMING OF METRO: PART 2 •  ARLINGTON LOBBIED STRONGLY FOR ROUTES AND MORE

STATIONS:

–  Preferred underground down old commercial corridors

–  Put up $300 million local money for preferred routes and more stations

23

Peter L Bass


THE OPPORTUNITY

COMING OF METRO: PART 3

24

Peter L Bass


2002 – THIRTY YEARS LATER!

2014

25

Peter L Bass


THE OPPORTUNITY

COMING OF METRO: PART 4

•  SEVEN STATION AREAS SLATED FOR SUBSTANTIAL DENSITY & GROWTH

•  FOCUS DENSE REDEVELOPMENT WITHIN 1/4 MILE OF METRO STATION ENTRANCES TO ENCOURAGE TRANSIT RIDERSHIP

26

Peter L Bass


PRINCIPAL TOOLS REGULATING PLANS:

•  ADOPTED CORRIDOR-WIDE GENERAL LAND USE PLANS BASED ON AGREED-TO DEVELOPMENT GOALS

–  Overall “framework’’ is high density, mixed use development within 1/4 mile of closely spaced underground metro stations

–  4.0 to 10.0 F.A.R. – “bull’s eye” approach

27

Peter L Bass


28

Peter L Bass


COUNTY LAND USE PLAN

29

Peter L Bass


PRINCIPAL TOOLS

GENERAL LAND USE PLAN INDICATES THE COUNTY’S WILLINGNESS TO REZONE FOR HIGHER DENSITY IN THE 2 CORRIDORS:

–  BUT LAND REMAINS ZONED LOW DENSITY UNTIL –  SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ARE SUBMITTED

–  CONSISTENT WITH SECTOR PLANS FOR THE SPECIFIC STATION AREA

30

Peter L Bass


WHEN THE PLANNING FOR METRO STARTED

9/10 OF COUNTY REMAINED PLANNED FOR SFD RESIDENTIAL

AND OTHER LOW DENSITY

1/10 OF COUNTY (2 RAIL CORRIDORS) WERE RE-PLANNED TO ENCOURAGE MIXED-USE HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT)

31

Peter L Bass


ON THE GROUND

Photo - Density Curve

32

Peter L Bass


SECTOR PLANS

DISTINCTIVE “URBAN VILLAGES”

33

Peter L Bass


AN URBAN VILLAGE

34

Peter L Bass


AN URBAN VILLAGE

Page from a Clarendon project web marketing site

35

Peter L Bass


AN URBAN VILLAGE

36

Peter L Bass


CLARENDON 2014

37

Peter L Bass


AN URBAN VILLAGE

38

Peter L Bass


AN URBAN VILLAGE

39

Peter L Bass


AN URBAN VILLAGE – 2004 PLAN

40

Peter L Bass


AN URBAN VILLAGE - 2014

41

Peter L Bass


AN URBAN VILLAGE

42

Peter L Bass


PRINCIPAL TOOLS

PROPERTY IS ONLY REZONED FOR THE HIGHER DENSITY USE SHOWN VIA A SPECIAL EXCEPTION HEARING PROCESS

(“SITE PLAN REVIEW”)

OCCURS ONLY IN CONTEXT OF SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL –  Must remain within guidelines set in the Plans

–  Must provide for various public benefits /features –  Can sometimes proffer extra benefits for added density.

–  Must survive very rigorous and extensive process of reviews

43

Peter L Bass


PRINCIPAL TOOLS

Density incentives to induce desired redevelopment patterns

De minimus public investment beyond original

metro commitment

•  Developers & landowners directly absorb costs of all “public amenities” via density incentives

44

Peter L Bass


PRINCIPAL TOOLS

EXAMPLES OF REQUIREMENTS: –  Wellburn Square park and retail

frontages, art

45

Peter L Bass


PRINCIPAL TOOLS

EXAMPLES OF REQUIREMENTS: Clarendon Commons street, public parking, plaza , mixed use:

46

Peter L Bass


SOME OF THE RESULTS

R-B CORRIDOR 1970 R-B CORRIDOR TODAY

22,000 jobs

5.5 million sf office

7,000 housing units

Over 100,000 jobs

25+ million sf office

30,000 housing units

47

Peter L Bass


SOME OF THE RESULTS

R-B CORRIDOR 2000

48

Peter L Bass


MID 2014

49

Peter L Bass


ROSSLYN TODAY

50

Peter L Bass


COURTHOUSE TODAY

51

Peter L Bass


CLARENDON TODAY

52

Peter L Bass


CLARENDON TODAY

53

Peter L Bass


BALLSTON TODAY

54

Peter L Bass


BALLSTON TODAY

55

Peter L Bass


BALLSTON TODAY

56

Peter L Bass


TOUR OF BALLSTON

57

Peter L Bass


TOUR OF BALLSTON

58

Peter L Bass


ECONOMIC/FISCAL

RETURN ON THE 1970’S METRO INVESTMENT $300 MILLION ADDED CAPITAL COST IN EARLY 1970’S

Equals $20 million/yr. long term carry

ADDED DEVELOPMENT TO DATE: OVER $10 BILLION IN AV Generates approximately $ 200 million/yr. in all sorts of added taxes/

revenues. 10 times the annual debt servicing costs – now paid off

APPROXIMATELY $1 BILLION IN PRIVATELY FUNDED “PUBLIC” BENEFITS

Obtained at Site Plan Approval stage (50 million sf. @ average of $20/sf)

59

Peter L Bass


TRANSPORTATION BENEFITS

TREMENDOUS GAINS IN METRO RIDERSHIP BOTH DIRECTIONS AT STATIONS

PERCENTAGE OF CORRIDOR RESIDENTS USING METRO OR

WALKING TO WORK EXCEEDS 50% CAR OWNERSHIP RATES AVERAGE ABOUT 1.13 PER HHLD IN

THE CORRIDORS AND ARE DECLINING vs 1.75 for INNER SUBURBS

60

Peter L Bass


TRANSPORTATION BENEFITS

TRAFFIC LOADS ON MAJOR SURFACE ARTERIALS HAVE NOT SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED IN THE PAST TWO DECADES

Almost all increase is on metro , bus lines and walking.

ZIPCAR & CAPITAL BIKESHARE HAVE LOCAL OPERATIONS

A wide range of TDM plans are being implemented and feasible

METRO STATION ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS COMMAND HIGHER RENTS FOR EQUIVALENT BUILDING SPACE

10-15% premiums on residential rents for comparable buildings 20-25% rent premiums for office, with much higher sustained occupancy rates.

61

Peter L Bass


REFINEMENTS

62

Peter L Bass


REFINEMENTS

RETAIL ATTRACTION AND MARKETING PLANS:

63

Peter L Bass


REFINEMENTS

ART AND BIDS (BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT

DISTRICTS)

64

Peter L Bass


REFINEMENTS

USPO PROJECT: P3 Six different uses Historic Preservation and new Shared parking

65

Peter L Bass


LESSONS FOR OTHERS

REACH FOR THE HIGHER GROUND

I think I can… I think I can… I think I can

TAKE YOUR TIME ON THE BIG “FRAMEWORK” DECISIONS

66

Peter L Bass


LESSONS FOR OTHERS IMPORTANCE OF CITIZEN PROCESS AND GENERAL BUY-IN

THINK BIG AND INVOLVE ALL STAKEHOLDERS IN DIALOGUE

67

Peter L Bass


LESSONS FOR OTHERS

HAVE HIGH EXPECTATIONS PLAN WELL BE PATIENT MAINTAIN INTEGRITY OF PLAN: ONGOING CHAMPIONS &

CULTURE BE CONSISTENT

68

Peter L Bass


LESSONS FOR OTHERS

DENSITY CAN MOTIVATE THE PRIVATE SECTOR:

No eminent domain for redevelopment Density increases are a carrot Developers know what to expect A strong market definitely helps, …but you have to help create it by vision!

69

Peter L Bass


70

Peter L Bass


www.reviewjournal.com/.../ photos/traffic.jpg

71

Peter L Bass


FOR MORE INFORMATION

CONTACT INFO

Peter L. Bass Development Advisory Services [email protected] 703-967-3175

72

Peter L Bass


PETER L. BASS – BRIEF BIO

Peter’s passion is urban innovation, taking on challenging projects to better our transportation systems and living environments. His experience includes work on public-private partnerships (P3s) , planning and implementation of community and transit oriented development (TOD), and large scale mixed use real estate projects. His recent work includes using locally based public-private partnerships to finance and implement streetcar systems, as well as transit oriented development. Until he recently opened his own advisory practice, Peter had been HDR’s Director, Urban Development Advisory Services, working on over ten streetcar projects nationwide, several multimodal transportation terminals and numerous TOD projects. In the early 2000’s, he had been Sr. Urban Development Specialist at Arlington County, Virginia's economic development department. In his role there, he devised new strategies and incentives for public-private efforts to further the evolution of the County's national award winning transit-oriented corridor developments. This will be the subject of his remarks today. Peter formerly worked for 30 years as advisor, manager, and principal on private and public sector urban developments in over 60 cities, 10 countries and for the World Bank, USAID and the Inter-American Development Bank.

Density by Desire! Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice

Real Estate

Transcript of Density by Desire! Transit Oriented Development Case Study Best practice