Denning, Representing Global Labor
Transcript of Denning, Representing Global Labor
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
1/22
Representing Global Labor
Michael DenningArise, you prisoners o starvation!Arise, you wretched o the earth!
For justice thunders condemnation.
A better worlds in birth.
No more traditions chains shall bind us.
Arise you slaves, no more in thrall!
The earth shall rise on new oundations.
We have been naught, we shal l be all.
Tis the nal confict;
Let each stand in his place
The international working class
Shall be the human race.
The Internationale
These are the common U.S. lyrics to The Internationale, which was
written in 1871 by the Communard poet Eugne Pottier ater the all o
the Paris Commune.1 Pottier, born in 1816, was one o the revolutionary
Parisian artisans o 1848, an admirer o Proudhon, a riend o Courbet,
a leader in the Paris Commune who subsequently went into exile in the
United States. His poem was set to music in 1888 by a member o a Li lle
workers chorus, Pierre Degeyter. By 1910, it had been adopted as the
anthem o the international workers movement. It later served as an
anthem o the Soviet Union, but it has been translated into many lan-
guages and sung around the world. It was banned in many parts o the
world in the early years o the century; it was sung by Wobblies in the
Lawrence textile strike and by the International Brigades in the Spanish
Civil War; and it was the source o Frantz Fanons most amous tit le.
I begin with The Internationale because it stands as one o the rst
great popular representations o global labor.2 Somewhere in the middle
o the nineteenth century one might mark it rom the amousManifesto
of the Communist Party o 1848, written by Pottiers German contempo-
raries Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, with its nal lines: Proletarier
aller Lnder, vereinigt euch! (Proletarians o all countries, unite!)
Social Text92, Vol. 25, No. 3, Fall 2007
DOI 10.1215/01642472-2007-008 2007 Duke University Press
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
2/22
126 Michael Denning
(superimposed over a classic Walter Crane image in g. 1, the cover o an1895 German pamphlet) or perhaps rom the moment o the organization
o the International Working Mens Association in 1864, the Internationale
that Pottier reers to in the chorus o the song people began to see the
workers o the world as constituting an interconnected global labor orce
sharing a common situation.
By the beginning o the twentieth century, this notion o an interna-
tional working class was a powerul imaginative construct, even i it was
in many ways a ction. What had actually emerged or the rst time were
powerul national labor movements, uniting socialist and labor parties,
trade and industrial unions, and a variety o working-class mutual aidsocieties and voluntary associations. But the songs o the movement not
only Pottier and Degeyters LInternationale, but the ot-translated
Italian song Bandiera Rossa, as well as Solidarity Forever, written
by the U.S. Wobbly Ralph Chaplin in 1915 marked the beginning o
an era that arcs rom the rst imaginings o a world working class to the
triumph o that representation o labor in the social democratic, laborist,
Figure 1. Walter
Cranes International
Solidarity o Labour,
1889. From Cartoons
for the Cause. Here
used as the cover to
a German pamphlet
o 1895 with the
nal lines rom the
Communist Manifesto.
Courtesy o the
International Institute
o Social History,
Amsterdam,
www.iisg.nl
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
3/22
Representing Global Labor 127
and communist visions o the twentieth century to the crisis o represent-
ing labor in the late twentieth century, a crisis that is imaginative as well as
organizational, cultural as well as political. Indeed LInternationale and
Solidarity Forever seem to be throwbacks to an era that is long past. Not
only had in the words o a celebrated essay by the pioneering historian
o labor, Eric Hobsbawm the orward march o labor halted, but labor
seemed a curious anachronism.3
How do we understand the ading o this representation at a moment
when a global labor orce seems to corporate employers and international
nancial institutions more palpable than ever? This essay, which is part
o a larger book I am writing on workers o the world, on what might be
called the workers century, is about the project o representing global
labor imaginatively, cultural ly, politically. I want to suggest that the
representation o global labor required, historically, two crucial break-
throughs: a new abstraction o labor, o work, and the invention o work-
ers as a category; and a new sense o the globe, o the international. Inthe second part, I will argue that there are two dominant contemporary
representations o global labor, one gured by the photographs o Sebas-
tio Salgado and the other by the graphs and pie charts o the World Bank
report. Though both are powerul, even inescapable, neither resolve the
imaginative crisis o the gure o labor. In the nal part, I address this
sense o imaginative crisis that has led many contemporary thinkers to
reject the very categories o labor and laborer as inadequate. It is
neither possible nor desirable simply to revive the old labor hymns, but
neither can we avoid the reality o the worldwide accumulation o labor.
A refection on the constitution o the category o workers is, I suggest,a necessary moment in any subaltern account o workers o the world,
o the international division o labor.
Abstracting Work, Imagining the Globe
The frst breakthrough was in representing work. This was a break-
through o the new discourse o political economy, and the story is per-
haps best told by that avid student o political economy, Karl Marx, in
the rst drat o his introduction to the book that would become Capital.He writes in 1857,
Labour seems a quite simple category. The conception o labour in this
general orm as labour as such is also immeasurably old. Nevertheless,
when it is economically conceived in this simplicity, labour is as modern
a category as are the relations which create this simple abstraction. . . . It
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
4/22
128 Michael Denning
was an immense step orward or Adam Smith to throw out every limiting
specifcation o wealth-creating activity not only manuacturing, or
commercial or agricultural labour, but one as well as the others, labour in
general. . . . Now, it might seem that all that had been achieved thereby was
to discover the abstract expression or the simplest and most ancient relation
in which human beings in whatever orm o society play the role o
producers. This is correct in one respect. Not in another. Indierence towardsany specic kind o labour presupposes a very developed totality o real kinds
o labour, o which no single one is any longer predominant. . . . Indierence
towards specic labours corresponds to a orm o society in which individuals
can with ease transer rom one labour to another, and where the specic kind
is a matter o chance or them, hence o indierence.4
I begin rom Marxs great insight that the apparently simple category
o labor just work, not weaving, tailoring, welding, teaching, cook-
ing, driving, typing is the product o a society that itsel is able to see
these indierently, as versions o the same kind o activity, reducible to amultiplier so many dollars and cents per hour. For not only does labor
become a new kind o abstraction, the product o the new economic rela-
tions o capitalism, but so does the category o the worker or laborer to
name the masses o wage earners in these new relations.
These new workers began to represent themselves as such not only
as weavers, welders, teachers, and cooks, but as workers and they rep-
resented themselves and were represented by others, socially (through
unions, mutual aid, and riendly societies, as well as through inormal
social networks), politically (through labor parties rom the Workingmans
Party in Philadelphia in 1832 to the Workers Party in Brazi l a century anda hal later), and cultural ly (in novels, songs, lms, government statistics,
sociological studies, autobiographies, newspapers, and so on).
The second great breakthrough was the imagination o an interdepen-
dent globe, a world economy that was truly connected. It is not clear exactly
when such a popular globalism emerges; most o the work on the nineteenth
century is the story o nationalizing populations, turning peoples whose
allegiance was to village or town into national citizens through schools and
armies. The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries had seen the emergence
o the motley crew that Peter Linebaugh and Marcus Redikker write
o in The Many-Headed Hydra, a shipboard proletariat o sailors, slaves,and pirates who circulated radical ideologies rom port to port. But the
worldwide system o migratory labor that develops in the nineteenth cen-
tury with the steamship the proletarian mass migrations rom Europe
and the Asian contract labor migrations combined with the series o
imperialist wars made transoceanic connections a part o daily lie in the
new industrial cities, company towns, and industrial plantations.
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
5/22
Representing Global Labor 129
However, in this case, the great theoretical breakthrough was made
not by Marx or anyone o his generation but by Rosa Luxemburg, a hal-
century younger. For Marxs generation, the international o workers was
experienced as the migration o artisans across Europe and to the settler
colonies, looking or work and or political reuge. Marx himsel, though
not an artisan, lived in the world o migrant German artisans in Paris,
Brussels, and eventual ly London (he also thought seriously o joining the
German artisan diaspora in New York). As a result, the international o
workers meant two things, and one can see this in the actual day-to-day
work o the First International in the 1860s: frst, cross-border strike
support; and second, rhetorical support or the struggles o oppressed
nationalities particularly the I rish, the Poles, and (in a slightly dierent
way) the antislavery Union orces in the U.S. Civil War combined with
material support or the community o transnational political reugees
and exiles.
But i this is the activist meaning o the international, Marx also beginsto imagine the international theoretically ater his arrival in London, the
capital o the British Empire, where he begins a crash sel-education in
imperialism. Though the major ocus o Capital is national England
is its chie illustrat ion Marx begins to sense a global working class
through the vehicle o a global industry: the texti le industry, where a com-
plex global division o labor unites the growing and processing o abrics,
where cotton links Manchester with Charleston, Cairo, and Calcutta, the
Irish immigrant actory women o Manchester with the Arican American
slaves o the plantation South and the dispossessed handloom weavers o
colonial India.But a uller sense o a global capitalism does not emerge until the early
twentieth century, when the extraordinary young postcolonial intellectual
Rosa Luxemburg a Polish Jewish woman who leaves Warsaw as teenage
activist, acing arrest, to study or a doctorate in Zurich and then become
a leader o the German socialist par ty in Berlin rewrites Marxs Capital
in an extraordinary way. For the third and greatest part o her masterwork
The Accumulation of Capital(1913) is the rst account o capitalism as
global proletarianization: as the dispossession o handcrat workers and
subsistence agriculturalists around the world. I wont summarize the ull
theoretical argument, but let me cite the concrete examples in her narrativeto show how Marxs earlier account o the enclosures o the commons in
England has been radical ly globalized by Luxemburg.
Luxemburg sees three aspects o this global proletarianization: rst,
the struggle o capital against what she calls the natural economy in
which her examples are the British in India, the French in Algeria, and the
opening o China during the opium wars. The second moment is the
Though the
major ocus
oCapital is
national
England
is its chie
illustration
Marx begins to
sense a global
working class
through the
vehicle o a
global industry:
the textile
industry.
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
6/22
130 Michael Denning
struggle against the commodity economy by which she means the strug-
gle against an independent peasant and handicrat economy. Here she has a
chapter on the U.S. plains and the post Civil War revolution in American
agriculture, where the struggle against the natural economy o the Red
Indians is ollowed by a struggle against the commodity economy o the
plains armers (which led to populist revolt); her other example is South
Arica, where again the dispossession o the native peoples is ollowed by
British capitalist war against the Boer settlers. The third moment is the
competitive struggle o capital on the international stage or the remain-
ing conditions o accumulation: the moment o imperialism, the stage
o lending abroad, railroad constructions, revolutions, and wars where
she uses the example o British capital in Latin America and Egypt and
o German capital in Turkey to analyze the eects o oreign debt and
oreign capital investment.5
Though Luxemburgs argument became the ocus o a long and
now-exhausted debate, her powerul and original mapping o the globaldivision o labor was not developed in subsequent work. For most o the
twentieth century, labor was imagined through the lens o the nation. The
very enranchisement o organized workers as citizens o parliamentary
nation-states and racially structured colonial empires led to the national-
izing o labor. I the socialist and labor parties invented the working
class as a political actor, as Donald Sassoon has argued,6 they invented it
as a national working class. Analytically, a methodological nationalism
has inormed most analysis o workers; rom Engels own The Condition of
the English Working Class in 1844 to E. P. Thompsons great study o 1963,
The Making of the English Working Class, the nation ramed the understand-ing o the working class.
By the end o the twentieth century, the emergence o something called
globalization made the notion o a global labor orce more palpable: the
Harvard Business Review published the study Global Work Force 2000 :
The New World Labor Market in 1991. It seemed that the era o global-
ization created or the rst time a world labor orce, a global working class.
The massive migration o the peasantry to global barrios and avelas and
ghettos not least in the United States and the extraordinarily rapid
industrialization o the worlds South has led to a vast remaking o the
working classes; one economist has said that the global Souths industri-alization took place in hal the time, at twice the growth rates, and with
ve times the Norths population in the nineteenth century.7 Moreover,
the eroding or end o the state policies that constituted particular national
working classes with their citizen workers the welare states and iron
rice bowls o the social democracies and the peoples democracies o mid-
By the end o
the twentieth
century, the
emergence o
something called
globalization
made the notion
o a global labor
orce more
palpable.
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
7/22
Representing Global Labor 131
century has thrown the national ly constituted parties and unions o the
labor movement in crisis.
But how have we gured this world labor orce, this global working
class? What are the mental maps, the imagined narratives that enable us
to comprehend such an abstract ion?
Global Work Force 2000
The nal decade o the twentieth century saw two powerul attempts to
represent the worlds workers as a whole: the remarkable photography
project o Sebastio Salgado, the exhibition and subsequent book titled
Workers: An Archaeology of the Industrial Age, and the World Banks land-
mark report o 1995, Workers in an Integrating World. Both were widely
noticed; both were controversial. I am less concerned with their adequacy
as representations the debates over Salgados aesthetics or the WorldBanks prescriptions than with the way their implicit narratives one
a vision o a receding industrial world, the other a vision o workers on
the move are symptoms o the dominant contemporary imaginations
o the worlds workers.
Photographing workers and orms o labor around the world between
1986 and 1992, Salgado provides powerul representation o a global work-
ing class that is a contradictory synthesis o retrospect ion and prophecy. (I
you have not seen Salgados work, you can view a number o the images at
Salgados Web site [www.terra.com.br/sebastiaosalgado/]; go to h is The
Majority World: Three Photo Essays and choose Workers. Most o thephotographs I discuss below are on the Web site.) Not only does Salgado
revive the ormal conventions o midcentury black-and-white documentary
photography, but he also casts the work in a retrospect ive mode; it is, he
says, a arewell to a world o manual labor that is slowly disappearing,
the story o an era the industrial era that is coming to an end.8
The works division into six sections refects the divisions o the indus-
tria l economy: part 1 is on the plantation production o agricultural com-
modities (or example, on the rst two pages o the Web photo essay, there
are images o tea plantation workers in Rwanda in 1991 and o sugar cutt ing
brigades in Cuba in 1988); part 2 ocuses on the slaughtering o animalsor mass-produced ood (on the third page o the Web photo essay, there
are images o shellsh shermen in Spain in 1988 and o slaughterhouse
workers in South Dakota in 1988); part 3 depicts the actory production
o industrial metals (iron, steel, lead, magnesium) and means o transport
(bicycles, scooters, automobiles, t rains, and ships) (on pages 4 6 o the
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
8/22
132 Michael Denning
Web photo essay, there are images o auto workers in India in 1989 90 and
o shipbuilding in France in 1990); parts 4 and 5 ocus on the extraction
o coal, gold, and oi l (pages 7 9 o the Web photo essay include images o
coal miners in Bihar, India, in 1989 and o oil workers in Kuwait in 1991);
and part 6 photographs the building o grand public works (tunnels, dams,
canals) (pages 10 11 o the Web photo essay include images o women
canal workers and dam workers in India in 1989 and tunnel workers in
Europe in 1990).
Salgados workers are not service sector workers: there are no wait-
resses or dishwashers, no janitors or department store clerks. Recalling his
childhood encounter with the great steel complexes o Minas Gerais,
he writes that to this day, steel making is or me an almost religious
experience. And the high priest o this institution called production is
the steelworker. For me, the mills are like huge, powerul gods who rule
the rightening production o metal that dominates our system.9 Like
the rest o us, Salgado is captured by a childhood sense o what workerslook like.
Moreover, the grand oppositions o the age o three worlds seem
to have structured the initial project: Salgado ater all was trained as a
development economist in So Paulo and Paris in the late 1960s and early
1970s, when the power and prestige o radical Latin American dependency
theory was at its height. As a result, one is not surprised by the ocus on
aspects o what is oten called the old international division o labor:
the plantations and mines that produce the third worlds primary com-
modities or the world market sugar, tobacco, tea, oil, sulur; nor is
one surprised by the juxtapositions o labor in capitalist and communistsocieties the opening sequence on sugarcane in Brazil and Cuba, part 3s
pairings o textile mills in Bangladesh and Kazakhstan and o shipyards
in France and Poland. The project was conceived beore the collapse o
the European Communist states, and rhetoric o three worlds persists in
its introduction: The planet remains divided, the rst world in a crisis o
excess, the third world in a crisis o need, and at the end o the century,
the second world that built on social ism in ruins.10
Perhaps the images that most dramatically draw us to the past are the
amous images o the masses o mud-soaked men digging or gold in Serra
Pelada, Brazil (see the rst image in the Web photo essay). You cantlocate it in history, the critic Arthur Danto wrote o them, youre aston-
ished that anything l ike that could happen in the contemporary world.11
The gold images are perhaps the ones most circulated, and they were the
rst ones taken (in 1986); but they are, I would suggest, unrepresentative
o the entire project.
Salgados portrait o the worlds workers is not completely retrospec-
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
9/22
Representing Global Labor 133
These images
o workers
surrounded by
the products o
their labor piles
o jute bags in
Bangladesh, o
hot dogs in South
Dakota, or o
bicycle rames in
China restore
the material basis
o our apparently
virtual world.
tive, nor is it exhausted by the images and ideologies that he inherited rom
the age o three worlds. Despite his raming narratives, the photographs
assert the immediacy and contemporaneity o the work being done. Most
o his images do not draw on the classicizing gaze, turning the gestures
o labor into composed still lives o muscle and metal, as in the Dunkirk
urnace image on page 4 o the Web photo essay. Rather, most o his
images o work capture everyday moments: moments o repetitive rou-
tines, o exertion, o rest (note the image o the metallurgical workers in
the Ukrainian sauna on page 4 o the Web photo essay).
I these are not photographs o the age o heroic industrialism, like
Charles Sheelers images o a cathedral-like River Rouge, neither are these
the images o deindustrial ization that dominated U.S. lm and photogra-
phy o the rust belt: emptied actory buildings with broken windows and
padlocked ences waiting or restoration as condominiums and estival
marketplaces, like Jim Wests classic image o a closed Cadillac plant in
Detroit (see http://jimwestphoto.com/set_economic.html). Rather, theseimages o workers surrounded by the products o their labor piles o jute
bags in Bangladesh, o hot dogs in South Dakota, or o bicycle rames in
China restore the material basis o our apparently v irtual world.
Moreover, the photographs create a powerul sense o a world labor
orce. Salgado does not divide his photographs into frst, second, and
third world, nor even into North and South. Nor does he link countries
and products in ways that would accent a divide between the technologies
o an automated, computerized North and a South built on manual labor.
The only U.S. workers photographed as part o the project were South
Dakota meatpackers, and the book ends by juxtaposing massive publicworks projects: the Channel Tunnel in Europe and the Narmada Dam in
India. It is not that Salgado misses the dramatic inequalities across the
globe; nor does he sentimentally construct an encompassing Family o
Man. The rhythm that develops across the our hundred photographs is
built on the aces and heads o the laborers: aces and heads sometimes
open and clear in portraits, sometimes obscured or cut o by the machines
and materials o the labor process (or example, in the image o an auto-
mobile assembly line in Calcutta in 1989), and oten covered by a variety
o rhyming goggles, masks, turbans, and hard hats.
A remarkable contrast to Salgados photos can be seen in the seconddocument rom the mid-1990s that also marked the discovery o a global
working class: the World Bank report o 1995, Workers in an Integrating
World. On its cover (g. 2) was Eight Builders, a 1982 painting o con-
struction workers by one o the centurys great proletarian artists, Jacob
Lawrence; inside was a remarkable portrait in graphs, tables, pie charts,
and anecdotes o the worlds workers.
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
10/22
134 Michael Denning
The World Bank report reminds us that the representation o labor has
long been an activity o what one might call the labor apparatuses o the
national and colonial state, a central part o those biopolitical regimes thatregulate bodies and populations. The creation o ministries and depart-
ments o labor in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries involved not
only the polit ical struggles over the legal regulation o labor relations the
legal status o unions, str ikes, and boycotts as well as the state regulation
o wages and hours but also the amassing o statistics about the labor
market and o testimonies in ront o legislative committees. The earliest
o these representations o labor were the amed blue books o the
British actory inspectors there were more than 300 books produced by
140 inspectors in the two decades ater the Factory Act o 1833. These
representations o workers enabled Marx to write Capital.12 Within ahal century, not only had other governments ollowed this path, but the
International Labor Organization (ILO) which was ounded in 1919 as
part o the League o Nations and continued in Geneva, later becoming
part o the UN began to collect worldwide statistics, imagining a global
labor orce.
Figure 2. Cover o 1995
World Bank report
Workers in an Integrating
World, with cover art by
Jacob Lawrence
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
11/22
Representing Global Labor 135
The representational work o these labor apparatuses cannot be
underestimated; their censuses and standard-o-living surveys created
the categories through which we stil l think about work. For example, the
ILO helped codiy the divide between the agricultural, industrial, and
service sectors, a categorization in which the service sector was never
really theorized but was a residual category. Yet the debates and polemics
about the apparent transormation marked by the shit rom industrial
to service work depend on this crude measure. Similarly, Harry Braver-
man called attention to the reication o skill levels with the long-lasting
divide between skilled, unsk illed, and semi-skilled, a category that was
created, in the United States, by the census bureau to account or the new
machine operators and assemblers in the mass production plants. Much
o the debate about deskilling depended on these categories; recent work
in labor studies has shown not only that the denition o skill is a cultural
product, but also that workers have continually ought over the classica-
tions o particular jobs.In another way, the testimonies o workers beore legislative committee
hearings orchestrated by union leaders and populist politicians, to be
sure nevertheless mark a crucial moment when working people repre-
sented themselves to the state.
Thus the World Bank report is a vital stake in the way a global labor
orce is being represented. Though its general perspective and its policy
recommendations neoliberalism with a human ace were predictable,
its representation o the global labor orce set the parameters o debate and
discussion or much o the last decade.
What is the picture o the worlds workers that the World Bank givesus? First, it oers a history, a narrative built on the existence and ailure
o two alternatives to the present: the central ly planned economies o the
communist world and the postcolonial import substitution economies. It
is an account o the shit rom what I have called the age o three worlds
to the single integrating world. However, and this is the second point,
they see the world stil l divided into three, no longer ideologically but eco-
nomically: higher, middle, lower income. In 1995, they wrote, the worlds
labor orce was made up o 2.5 billion men and women, almost twice as
many as in 1965.13 About 60 percent o the worlds workers were in low-
income countries; another quarter was in middle-income countries; thehigh-income countries made up 15 percent o the total. When they divide
this by sector agriculture, industry, service, unemployed, not in labor
market they nd that a third o the worlds workers are not in the labor
orce. This is urther elaborated in an extended discussion o what they
see as household labor decisions: who works, how much (labor hours
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
12/22
136 Michael Denning
and the controversy over the trajectory o labor hours), and where (the
issue o migration).
Their general conclusion is that world inequality is increasing, that we
are seeing divergence, not convergence, and they have several dramatic
representations o the distribution o earnings across the world to show
this. For example, the pay ratio o engineers to women textile workers is
eight to one in Nairobi and three to one in Frankurt. This dramatic di-
erence in internal wage rates is then amplied internationally: the pay
ratio o German to Kenyan engineers is seven to one, that o German to
Kenyan women textile workers is eighteen to one.14
To put names to these numbers, the report opened with our minia-
ture narratives o the worlds workers, which metaphorically account or
three-quarters o the worlds workers: Duong, a Vietnamese rice armer
(Workers like Duong, laboring on amily arms in low- and middle-
income countries, account or about 40 percent o the worlds labor orce);
Hoa, a garment actory worker in Ho Chi Minh City (Wage employeeslike Hoa, working in the ormal sector in low- and middle-income coun-
tries, make up about 20 percent o the global labor orce); Franoise, a
Vietnamese immigrant in France working as a waitress (Franoise and
other service sector workers in high-income countries account or about
9 percent o the global labor orce); and Jean-Paul, a now-unemployed
French garment worker (Workers in industry in high-income countries . . .
make up just 4 percent o the worlds labor orce).15
This World Bank story epitomizes the narrative o the worlds working
class that has come to dominate the last decade. Unlike Salgados linking
o workers by their place in the industrial division o labor plantations,mines, and manuacturing the World Bank links them through a geog-
raphy o jobs, a labor chain that implicitly links Duong with Jean-Paul
through the processes o internal labor migration rom rural agriculture to
urban manuacturing (Hoa is Duongs symbolic daughter) and interna-
tional labor migration rom ormer colony to ormer colonizer (as Franoise
is Hoas symbolic sister), as well as the implied export o garment indus-
try jobs rom Toulouse to Ho Chi Minh City, rom Jean-Paul to Hoa.
So ar, the key imaginative orm by which this new reality o a world
labor orce has been captured is the story o people moving across borders
to nd work: though transnational migrant workers make up only about2 percent o the world labor orce, they have become the gures by which
we can imagine the transormations. One thinks o Gregory Navas great
lm o 1984, El Norte, which ollows a Guatemalan brother and sister as
they pass through the underworld o a rat-inested sewage tunnel to cross
the border between Mexico and Cal iornia; or o Xavier KollersJourney of
Hope (1990), which tells the tale o a Kurdish amily rom Turkey crossing
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
13/22
Representing Global Labor 137
Thus, the World
Bank report
would not lead
us to conclude
that workers are
disappearing;
deindustrialization
is actually
industrial
relocation, as
working classes
are being remade
and recomposed.
the Alps in winter; or o Adrian Caetanos Bolivia (2001), with its narra-
tive o the migrant Peruvian restaurant worker in Buenos Aires. Indeed,
Salgados own work testies to this imaginative shit; in the late 1990s, he
ollowed his Workers project with the photographic workMigrations.
Thus, the World Bank report would not lead us to conclude that
workers are disappearing; deindustrialization is actually industrial relo-
cation, as working classes are being remade and recomposed. More-
over, recent studies would suggest here the World Bank report is less
helpul that worker sel-organization and militancy has not, as is oten
thought, declined or disappeared. As the important work o the World
Labor Research Group at the Braudel center in Binghamton has shown,
labor unrest rose around the world in the 1980s and 1990s, ollowing the
shit in manuacturing, and the industrial revolution in the South. Indeed,
by the end o the century we see what one labor historian has called an
unprecedented world-wide action a coordinated global work stoppage
by dockworkers in 1997.16
Nevertheless, though the twentieth century may have been the work-
ers century, hardly anyone thinks the twenty-rst century will be a century
o the worker. What constitutes this crisis o labor? What is wrong with the
notion o work or labor, with the gure o the worker or the laborer? Why
does it seem that we now need a new representation: the multitude, the
subaltern? Even the scholarly representation o labor labor history is
in crisis, challenged by new orms o subaltern studies.
The Crisis of the Figure of Labor
The crisis o labor has many aspects. First and oremost, it has appeared
as a political crisis, a crisis o the social movement that constituted itsel
on the basis o the gure o the worker, the labor parties and trade unions
that emerged in the epoch o Pottier and Degeyters LInternationale.
Union membership has fuctuated wildly over the course o the last cen-
tury, with moments o accelerating growth alternating with periods o
collapse. Socialist and labor parties grew more steadily and held their
ground Goran Therborn and Donald Sassoon both suggest that they
reach the height o their power in the late 1970s but rarely achieved sta-ble majorities o the voting population; they were caught in the dilemma
that Adam Przeworski identifed: in order to gain electoral majorities,
they had a tendency to move away rom the workerist ideologies o their
core constituency to broader populist and nationalist appeals; but that
move away rom workerist ideologies weakened the allegiance o their
core constituents.17
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
14/22
138 Michael Denning
A century
ater The
Internationale,
labor was oten
seen as an
interest group,
not a fgure or
the whole o
toiling humanity.
More important, the articulation between the movement institutions
and specic groups o workers ree, independent producers, workingmen
earning a amily wage, enranchised (which is to say male, white, native-
born) citizen workers, skilled cratworkers, or, by the mid-twentieth cen-
tury, ormal sector mass-production workers in the commanding Fordist
industries meant that the unions and parties o labor not only adopted
the racial, gender, and national ideologies o those workers but were unable
to see the toil o unwaged, unree, unski lled, unwhite, undocumented, and
unmale toilers as labor, or to see them as workers.
Thus rom the beginning o the labor movement, there were challenges
to its capacity to represent the prisoners o starvation, the wretched o
the earth, by its sibling social movements: the womens movement, the
anticolonial and anti-imperial national movements, the antislavery move-
ment, and the subsequent movement o postslave communities. These
social movements or civil, social, and cultural citizenship oten avoided or
reused the gure o labor. Though Fanon adopted the phrase les damnsde la terre rom The Internationale, he did it to highlight the ailure o
the promise that the international working class would be the human race:
Generally speaking, he writes in the nal pages oThe Wretched of the
Earth, the European workers did not respond to the call. The act was that
the workers believed they too were part o the prodigious adventure o the
European Spirit.18 A century ater The Internationale, labor was oten
seen as an interest group, not a gure or the whole o toiling humanity.
This political crisis o the labor movement is not my central concern
in this essay. It has been recognized by labor movement activists or more
than two decades, and its resolution depends on the success or ailure othose activists to recreate a movement that wins the allegiance o working
people around the globe.
Rather, I would like to address the imaginative crisis, the sense that the
innocuous second hal o that last sentence working people around the
globe is not so innocent, but is an inadequate, superseded gure, a mis-
leading abstraction that comes bundled with a host o suspect connotations
about work and workers. What is wrong with these terms? There are two
dierent indictments that complement each other. First, workeris said to be
too specic a gure, too ull o metaphoric connotations. To say workeris
to conjure up a specic body: the white, male, manual laborer o the classicWobbly poster working in the large actories o the metal-working indus-
tries, l iving in a heterosexual household in the working-class tenements o
the smoke-lled industrial cities, and drinking at the neighborhood tav-
ern, bar, pub, or ca (see Fig. 3). The result o a century o the cultural
enranchisement o labor has been to create such a powerul iconography
that it now seems not only exclusive but tradit ional and conservative. The
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
15/22
Representing Global Labor 139
iconography o the blue-collar workingman rom Andy Capp to ArchieBunker to Homer Simpson is that o a lovable authoritarian, patriarchal
but henpecked, always singing that those were the days.
This is not the only image that workerbrings to mind. The iconogra-
phy o labor has, one might say, an entire holy amily, whose second most
common gure is the sweatshop daughter, the swarthy, sultry, and seduced
mil l girl, eternally victimized, rom the Irish seamstresses o the 1840s in
Manchester and New York to the Jewish and Italian shirtwaist makers o
the early twentieth century to the Mexican and Malaysian maquiladora
workers o the late twentieth century. The World Banks narrative o Jean
Paul, Hoa, and Franoise is another version o this iconography.Here we are caught in the ull contradictions o guration itsel. On
the one hand, powerul ideologies those narratives we tell ourselves in
order to make sense o an incomprehensible social totality, those cogni-
tive maps by which we gure where we are depend on richly elaborated
metaphors, giant characters: as John Lennon once sang, a working-class
hero is something to be. The creation o working-class heroes has been
Figure 3. Cover o
Abner E. Woodru,
The Advancing
Proletariat(Chicago,
IWW Publishing
Bureau, 1917).
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
16/22
140 Michael Denning
an extraordinary cultural revolution, a revaluing o ordinary lives, so that
tragedy is no longer the monopoly o royal houses but is the stu o ple-
bian amilies. Similarly, the invention o labor as a political actor in state
politics municipal and then national is one o the central accomplish-
ments o the labor movement.
On the other hand, the very materialization o labor in specifc
working-class heroes reduces and reies the original promise o the meta-
phor to embody not a single worker but the entire dispersed wretched o
the earth. So it is that the most powerul terms that have been created to
replace the overly rich gure olaborare not the gures o equal metaphoric
richness the people, women, citizen, consumer,gay, or the various nation-
alities but are those terms that attempt to repel any positive content: the
subaltern, which, in the words o Ranajit Guhas 1981 preace to Subaltern
Studies, is a name or the general attribute o subordination . . . whether
this is expressed in terms o class, caste, age, gender, oce or any other
way or the multitude, which is, in the words o Michael Hardt and AntonioNegri, a set o singularities . . . a social subject whose dierence cannot
be reduced to sameness, a dierence that remains dierent.19
One or another o these terms may well prove to be empty enough
to encompass les damns de la terre ; it is worth recalling, however, that
this emptiness was the precise useulness o the term proletarian when it
was adopted by the French and German communists o the 1830s and
1840s. Long beore the advancing male proletarian o the IWW posters,
proletariat was derived rom a Roman census term that meant one who
contributes nothing to the state except ospring; in the early nineteenth
century it reerred to the lowest stratum o poor and propertyless reemen;the term oten meant living in pauperism.20 Labor itsel was an abject
category whose negative connotations working girl long carried the
connotations o prostitution were later transgured: think o the curious
rhetoric o knights o labor and ladies o labor in the 1880s and 1890s.
The other objection to work and labor as categories is that they are
too abstract, that they reduce the tremendous variety and meanings o
human act ivity to a notion o abstract labor. Perhaps the most powerul
version o this argument has been made by Dipesh Chakrabarty, a labor
historian the author o the classic study o jute mill workers o Bengal,
Rethinking Working-Class History: Bengal, 1890 1940 who develops acrit ique o the very concept o labor. Work and labor, he writes, are
words deeply implicated in the production o universal sociologies. Labor
is one o the key categories in the imagination o capitalism itsel. In the
same way that we think o capitalism as coming into being in all sorts o
contexts, we also imagine the modern category work or labor as emerg-
ing in a ll kinds o histories. . . . Yet the act is that the modern word labor,
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
17/22
Representing Global Labor 141
as every historian o labor in India would know, translates into a general
category a whole host o words and practices with divergent and dierent
associations.21 This universa l sociology which he shared ailed to
make sense o the hathiyar puja, the worship o tools, a common estival
in north Indian actories: Like many o my colleagues in labor history, I
interpreted worshiping machinery an everyday act o lie in India, rom
taxis to scooter-rickshaws, minibuses, and lathe machines as insurance
policy against accidents and contingencies. That in the so-cal led religious
imagination (as in language), redundancy the huge and, rom a strict ly
unctionalist point o view, unnecessarily elaborate panoply o iconography
and rituals proved the poverty o a purely unctionalist approach never
deterred my secular narrative.22
Chakrabarty extends this critique o universal sociologies o work to
Marxs concept o abstract labor itsel, arguing in a manner parallel
to Lisa Lowe in her Immigrant Acts that the abstract labor o Marx is,
like the abstract citizen, a particular instance o the idea o the abstracthuman the bearers o rights, or example popularized by Enlighten-
ment philosophers. I wont try to summarize Chakrabartys brilliant
and persuasive interpretation o Marxs theory o abstract labor. But the
diculty he points to and it is similar to the zero-work argument o
autonomist Marxism is that to speak the words work and laboris already
to be speaking the vernacular o capitalism, the language o commodi-
ties, the idiom o political economy. To invoke workers as the gure or
an emancipated humanity is already to accept the logic o capitalism. For
Chakrabarty, an analytical history speaks o workers and work through
the abstract ing categories o capital this would be a labor history. Healso holds out a second history, a subaltern history, which beckons us to
more affective narratives o human belonging where lie orms, although
porous to one another, do not seem exchangeable through a third term o
equivalence such as abstract labor. The subaltern, he writes, is that
which constantly, rom within the narrative o capital, reminds us o other
ways o being human than as bearers o the capacity to labor.23
In many respects, Chakrabarty is right, and even Marx recognized
this. It is worth recalling that the central meaning o communism or
Marx was never the state ownership o the means o production, or even
workers control o production, but the dramatic reduction o the workingday. And the labor movement itsel recognized it: only rarely was worker
or laborerused as a sa lutation. The early labor movement adopted citizen
rom the French Revolution the minutes o the First International are
ull o Citizen Marx the communist movement adopted comrade, and
the trade union movement adopted brotherand sister.
Nonetheless, as many critics have argued, the labor movement oten
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
18/22
142 Michael Denning
did nd itsel committed to the political economy o capitalism, to a vari-
ety o productionisms that made an absolute virtue o work: trade unions
that ound themselves disciplining work orces and enorcing no-strike
pledges; militants who saw womens entry into wage labor as a necessary
step in the emancipation o women; anarcho-syndicalists whose notions
o workers control celebrated labor as central to manliness; Stakhanovite
communists or whom voluntary work brigades were necessary to the
building o socialism. The contrary traditions that, in Chakrabartys
words, remind us o other ways o being human than as bearers o the
capacity to labor movements or sexual, spiritual, or cultural transor-
mation have always seemed somewhat suspect to the reality-principle
o the labor movements.
In the ace o these critiques, should we abandon the gure o labor? I
think this is neither desirable nor possible. The ongoing search or a term
empty o connotations that could capture the experience o the dispos-
sessed will always be in tension with the ullness o guration. So there isan unavoidable dialectic between the imagination o new empty names to
stand or the incomprehensible and unimaginable totality that is toiling
humanity, the subaltern, the multitude, and the necessity o powerul and
reductive gures to map our relation to other people joined to us by this
global division o labor. We know well the dangers o taking the part or
the whole, but it is dicult to imagine the whole without those metonymic
devices (like the transnational migrants who are a tiny percentage o the
worlds workers). There have been moments where certa in specic groups
o workers did play disproportionate roles in helping to dene, shape, and
trigger oppositional movements.Moreover, this crisis o the gure o labor does not signal an end to
work or to workers. Rather it marks a reconguration o the shape o work
and workers. Despite the heroic attempts to create stable and long-lasting
organizations and narratives to represent working people, there is no stable
working class under capitalism. The term working class, properly under-
stood, Harry Braverman wrote in his classic Labor and Monopoly Capital,
never precisely delineated a specied body o people, but was rather an
expression or an ongoing social process. . . . the working class as it exists
[is] the shape given to the working population by the capital accumulation
process.24 Thus a capitalist economy continually reshapes workplaces andthe working population; it destroys old industr ies and old work orces while
drawing new workers rom around the globe and moving workplaces to new
regions. As Gareth Stedman Jones once noted, the phrase the making o
the English or any other working class is misleading; a working class
is no sooner made than it is unmade and remade. 25 Or, to put it in the
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
19/22
Representing Global Labor 143
Insoar as states,
corporations,
and international
fnancial
institutions
continue to
represent and
exploit a global
labor orce, it
is necessary to
engage in the
contest over
representing work
and workers.
language o the Ital ian autonomist thinkers, the process o class composi-
tion is always a process o decomposition and recomposition.
It is perhaps not surprising that the representations o labor oten seem
more solid and enduring than the labor process itsel. We remain caught
in the class maps we inherited rom amily, school, and movies. No mat-
ter what our position in the class structuring o the population, our class
images are usually a generation behind the realities o class ormation,
behind the orces o capitalism that are reshaping the working popula-
tion. Unortunately, this is oten true o the images held by the political
representatives o labor, the leaders and militants o labor part ies, unions,
and associations.
However, insoar as states, corporations, and international nancial
institutions continue to represent and exploit a global labor orce, it
is necessary to engage in the contest over representing work and workers,
creating new and more adequate metaphors as well as new organizations. I
the notion o a global labor movement seems utopian, with only a handulo actions by dockers to point to, it is worth remembering that a century
ago any national labor movement seemed just as unlikely.
One o Marxs central dialectical insights was that capital was just
another name or labor, that accumulation o capital is thereore mul-
tiplication o the proletariat.26 Similarly, since the working class is the
shape capital gives to the working population, the other, more abstract,
name or workers o the world is the international division o labor, a
concept that emerged out o anti-imperialist dependency theory. Without
rehearsing the scholarly controversies over the attempts to dene the old
and the new international divisions o labor, let me suggest that the concepto the international division o labor continues to be a key gure to capture
the unity and division o the global labor orce. Iworkers of the worldcan
lead us to an unrefective assumption o working-class solidar ity, the inter-
national division o labor reminds us o the structured hierarchy between
waged and unwaged work, ormal and inormal sectors, and o the various
ways we divide labor, in practice, in social science, and in popular thought.
The etish o the wage orm has long concealed the hidden abode o
domestic labor, reiying the totality o subaltern lie into apparently dist inct
worlds o workplace and household. Seeing the world working class as the
international division o labor (and vice versa) avoids the alse concretenesso the proletariat it does not equal industria l workers or ormal-sector
wage earners and the alse abstractness o homogenized labor.
It also enables us to resist a sense that there is a single trajectory toward
a homogenization o workers, toward a global unity or necessary solidarity.
It is understandable that the union and party politics o workers alliance
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
20/22
144 Michael Denning
constantly tempts militants to read a necessary logic o all iance into capital-
ism, imagin ing that one could move easily rom the social construction o
abstract labor in a capitalist economy to the actual reduction o dierences
among workers in the ormation o specic historical working classes.
But the central dynamic o working-class lie under capitalism is nei-
ther a secular trend toward homogenization, nor an innite prolieration
o dierences, but the dialectic between, to use Marxs words, competition
and association. The same orces that create the conditions or competi-
tion among workers (wage labor rests exclusively on competition between
the laborers, Marx writes in theManifesto) also create the condit ions or
association.27 But the reverse is also true. The orms o lie and struggle
o the unwaged, the unemployed, the inormal, the unrepresented are as
central to this dialectic o competition and association as are the lives and
struggles o those capital deems workers.
To the command o neoliberal globalization workers o the world,
compete we must answer with that old slogan o the global justice move-ment: workers o the world, unite. But in doing so, we need to put it in
new words, new songs, new gures o that yet unimagined, unrepresented
collectivity.
Notes
1. U.S. version o Eugne Pottier and Pierre Degeyter, LInternationale, in
Pete Seeger and Bob Reiser, Carry It On! A History in Song and Picture of the Work-
ing Men and Women of America (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1985), 97.
2. This was written as one o the Working Group on Globalization and
Cultures working papers on transnational cultural studies, and I want to thank
my collaborators in the Working Group (www.yale.edu/laborculture/wkg.grp_
GC.html). I also want to thank the respondents to earlier versions delivered in
Michigan, Johannesburg, Seattle, and Tepoztln: John Beck, Lisa Fine, Jyotsna
Singh, Bridget Kenny, Jon Hyslop, Achille Mbembe, Nikhil Singh, Reinaldo
Romn, Nichole Sanders, Elliott Young, Kristina Boylan, and Victor Macas.
3. Eric Hobsbawm, The Forward March o Labour Halted? Marxism
Today, September 1978, 279 86.
4. Karl Marx, Grundrisse, trans. Martin Nicolaus (New York: Vintage Books,
1973), 103 4.
5. Rosa Luxemburg, The Accumulation of Capital (New York: MonthlyReview, 1964), 419.
6. Donald Sassoon, One Hundred Years of Socialism: The Western European Left
in the Twentieth Century (New York: New Press, 1996), 7.
7. A. Singh, quoted in Ronaldo Munck, Globalisation and Labour: The New
Great Transformation(London: Zed Books, 2002), 107.
8. Sebastio Salgado, Workers: An Archaeology of the Industrial Age (New York:
Aperture, 1993), 6.
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
21/22
Representing Global Labor 145
9. Ibid., 13 14.
10. Ibid., 7.
11. Cited in Julian Stallabrass, Sebastio Salgado and Fine Art Photojournal-
ism, New Left Review, no. 223 (1997): 132.
12. David MacGregor, Hegel, Marx, and the English State (Toronto: University
o Toronto Press, 1996), 218.
13. World Bank, Workers in an Integrating World(World Development Report
1995) (New York: Oxord University Press, 1995), 9.
14. Ibid., 11.
15. Ibid., 1.
16. For the work o the World Labor Research Group, see Special Issue on
Labor Unrest in the World-Economy, 1870 1990, ed. Beverly J. Silver, Giovanni
Arrighi, and Melvyn Dubosky, Review 18, no. 1 (1995); and Beverly J. Silver,
Forces of Labor: Workers Movements and Globalization since 1870 (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2003). On the dockworkers action, see Kim Moody,
Workers in a Lean World(London: Verso, 1997), 249.
17. Goran Therborn, The Lie and Times o Socialism, New Left Review,
no. 194 (1992): 17 32; Sassoon, One Hundred Years of Socialism; Adam Przewor-
ski, Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism (Chicago: University o ChicagoPress, 1986).
18. Frantz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth, trans. Richard Philcox (New
York: Grove Press, 2004), 237.
19. Ranajit Guha, Preace reprinted in Ranajit Guha and Gayatri Chakra-
vorty Spivak, Selected Subaltern Studies (New York: Oxord University Press,
1988), 35; Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Multitude: War and Democracy in
the Age of Empire (New York: Penguin, 2004), 99.
20. Hal Draper, Karl Marxs Theory of Revolution: Volume Two (New York:
Monthly Review, 1978), 131.
21. Dipesh Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press, 2000), 76.
22. Ibid., 78.23. Ibid., 52, 71, 94.
24. Harry Braverman, Labor and Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly
Review, 1974), 24, 27.
25. Gareth Stedman Jones, Languages of Class (Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-
versity Press, 1983), 179 238.
26. Karl Marx, Capital, Volume 1, trans. Ben Fowkes (London: Penguin,
1976), 764.
27. Karl Marx, Political Writings, Volume 1: The Revolutions of 1848, ed. David
Fernbach (New York: Random House, 1973), 79.
-
7/27/2019 Denning, Representing Global Labor
22/22