DEMYSTIFYING THE RESEARCH FINANCE CYCLE -...
Transcript of DEMYSTIFYING THE RESEARCH FINANCE CYCLE -...
DEMYSTIFYING THE RESEARCH FINANCE CYCLE
Corporate Finance (Research)
Danny Sun – Senior Accountant
AGENDA
› HOUSEKEEPING
› WHO ARE WE
› WHAT WE DO
› SURVEY RESULTS
› HERDC STATISTICS
› BLOCK GRANTS OVERVIEW
› CFR INITIATIVES
› END-TO-END PROCESS
› CFR WEBSITE
› Q&A
2
TODAY‟S SESSION
WHO ARE WE
› TABITHA DAINES
› DEVA JAYARETNAM
› LENNY LI
› CARL NYGRYN
› MERON WOLDE
› KATRINA MAXIMOVA
› DANNY SUN
3
CORPORATE FINANCE RESEARCH TEAM
WHAT WE DO
› Provide Financial services to the DVC Research Portfolio
› Manage DVC Research Strategic Fund
› Provide Research Grant Management advices to research community,
including researchers and general staff, i.e. finance and research admin
staff
› Generate research related reports at the university level for external
reporting purposes
› Coordinate HERDC Financial Return (with Faculties, External Auditor,
Commonwealth)
› Coordinate ARC & NHMRC Income & acquittals (~1300 active accounts)
› Prepare Financial Acquittals (Agriculture & Science only, ~250 p.a. )
› Manage Research Account chart fields (~1000 @ maintenance & new yearly)
4
OUR TEAM:
SURVEY RESULTS
› Survey to Finance staff
- “CFR provided sufficient tools and instructions that allowed you to clearly
understand the acquittal process and requirements”
- 18% Strongly agreed
- 73% Agreed
- “CFR responded in an effective and supportive way to queries you had regarding
the acquittal statements”
- 18% Strongly agreed
- 82% Agreed
5
ARC & NHMRC ACQUITTAL
SURVEY RESULTS (CONT‟)
› Survey to Finance staff
- “I found the new Hyperion report: „ARC/NHMRC Excess Balance‟ that is based
on the SUGLQ105 query useful in satisfying the acquittal requirements for
projects with an excess carry forward ”
- 18% Strongly agreed
- 73% Agreed
6
ARC & NHMRC ACQUITTAL
SURVEY RESULTS (CONT‟)
› Survey to Academic staff
- “Overall the acquittal process has improved compared to last year”
- 4% Strongly agreed
- 65% Agreed
- “CFR provided sufficient tools and instructions that were helpful in allowing you
to acquit your research project”
- 7% Strongly agreed
- 64% Agreed
- “The financial statement of your research project was presented clearly and
professionally”
- 8% Strongly agreed
- 67% Agreed
7
ARC & NHMRC ACQUITTAL
SURVEY RESULTS (CONT‟)
› Survey to Academic staff
- Additional comments:
- “I have agreed with all the statements because it cost me no pain at all, our
finance officer was able to deal with the whole process with little or no input
from me”
- “There are just too many mistakes made in the accounting, it’s impossible to
know if the account is correct or not without working it out yourself”
8
ARC & NHMRC ACQUITTAL
SURVEY RESULT (CONT‟)
9
HERDC SURVEY
SURVEY RESULTS (CONT‟)
10
HERDC SURVEY
SURVEY RESULTS (CONT‟)
Attributes to the success
- Individual sessions
- Online access to report
- Soft copy submissions
Plan For 2011
- Full review – with the survey results and key players to design a strategy for
next year
- E – Filing supporting docs – next step from the Soft copy submissions
11
HERDC SURVEY
HERDC RESULT
12
SYDNEY RESULTS 2000 – 2009
HERDC RESULT(CONT‟)
13
SYDNEY RESULTS 2008 VS 2009
2009 HERDC Income Return
Category 2008 2009
Income (‘000) Income (‘000) Variance (‘000)
GL
Category 1 - National Competitive Grants 143,648 156,617 12,969
Category 2 - Other Public Sector Funding 40,872 44,855 3,983
Category 3 - Industry and Other Funding 87,833 72,854 -14,979
Category 4 - Cooperative Research Funding 6,016 4,628 -1,390
GL Grand Total 278,370 278,955 585
JV
Category 1 - National Competitive Grants 3,604 0 -3,604
Category 2 - Other Public Sector Funding 18,886 0 -18,886
Category 3 - Industry and Other Funding 52,663 0 -52,663
Grand Total 353,524 278,955 -74,568
HERDC RESULT(CONT‟)
14
GO8 RESULTS 2005 – 2009
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Adelaide ANU Melbourne Monash Sydney UNSW UQ UWA
Millio
ns
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
BLOCK FUNDING
- OVERVIEW
- The Research Training Scheme (RTS) supports research training for domestic
students undertaking Doctorate and Masters degrees by research
- Enhance the quality of research training provision in Australia
- Improve the responsiveness of HEP's to the needs of their research students
- Encourage HEPs to develop their own research training profiles
- Ensure the relevance of research degree programmes to labour market
requirements
- Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of research training
15
Research Training Scheme (RTS)
BLOCK FUNDING (CONT‟)
- FORMULA – 2010 ALLOCATION
- PERFORMANCE INDEX
- CAT 1 – 4 RESEARCH INCOME (40%), COMPLETIONS (50%),
PUBLICATIONS (10%)
- AVERAGE OVER THE MOST CURRENT TWO YEARS DATA, i.e. 2007 & 08
- THIS FORMS 25% OF CURRENT YEAR INCOME
- 75% CURRENT YEAR INCOME IS BASED ON:
• LAST THREE YEARS INCOME AMOUNT, i.e. 2006, 2007, 2008
• INDEXED TO 2009 PRICES
- HEPs ARE GUARANTEED TO RECEIVE 95% OF 2009 FUNDING AMOUNT
TO MINIMISE FLUCTUATIONS
16
Research Training Scheme (RTS)
BLOCK FUNDING (CONT‟)
- OVERVIEW
- From 2010, the JRE replaced the Institutional Grant Scheme (IGS).
- JRE encouraging and supporting collaborative research activities between
universities, industry and end-users, beyond those specifically supported by
competitive grants
- Continue to support soft infrastructure as well as the maintenance of capital
items (not capital purchases)
17
JOINT RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT (JRE)
BLOCK FUNDING (CONT‟)
- FORMULA – FOR 2010 ALLOCATION
- PERFORMANCE INDEX
- CAT 2 – 4 RESEARCH INCOME (60%), STUDENT LOADS (40%),
PUBLICATIONS (10%)
- MOST CURRENT YEAR DATA ONLY, i.e. 2008
Total JRE funds available x HEP‟s specific performance index
=
2010 ALLOCATION
- HEPs ARE GUARANTEED TO RECEIVE 95% OF 2009 FUNDING AMOUNT
TO MINIMISE FLUCTUATIONS
18
JOINT RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT (JRE)
BLOCK FUNDING (CONT‟)
- OVERVIEW
- Maintain and strengthen Australia‟s knowledge base and research capabilities by developing an effective research and research training system
- Remedy deficiencies in current research infrastructure
- Enhance support for areas of research strength
- Initiate high quality research activity, have access to the support necessary for development
- FORMULA – FOR 2010 ALLOCATION
- PERFORMANCE INDEX
• CAT 1 INCOME (100%)
- AVERAGE OF THE MOST CURRENT TWO YEAR DATA, i.e. 2007 & 08
Total RIBG funds available x HEP‟s specific performance index
=
2010 ALLOCATION
19
RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE BLOCK GRANT(RIBG)
BLOCK FUNDING (CONT‟)
20
2010 RTS VS JRE VS RIBG – GO8 ONLY
BLOCK FUNDING (CONT‟)
21
2010 RTS/JRE/RIBG GO8 vs OTHERS (33) TOTAL POOL $1.15 BILLION
BLOCK FUNDING (CONT‟)
- OVERVIEW
- New Scheme in 2010
- Ensure that these institutions are better placed to meet the indirect cost of
research activities that are not entirely met by the various competitive grant
programs.
- Address an identified shortfall in the funding available to meet the indirect
costs associated with Australian competitive grant research
- Support universities to build and maintain research excellence through the
implementation of best practice financial management, performance and
reporting framework
- 2010 Funding Pool - $85M
22
SUSTAINABLE RESEARCH EXCELLENCE (SRE)
BLOCK FUNDING (CONT‟)
- FORMULA
- Based on Cat 1 income only (average of the most recent two years)
- Three Components (2010 Funding Pool amount):
• SRE Base ($13M)
• SRE Threshold 1 ($8.45M)
• SRE Threshold 2 ($43.55M))
• Implementation – 2010 only ($20M)
- SRE Base - 20% (all HEPs)
- SRE Threshold 1 - 13% (only HEPs participate in Transparent Costing)
- SRE Threshold 2 – 67% (only HEPs participate in Transparent Costing &
Excellence in Research for Australia)
23
SUSTAINABLE RESEARCH EXCELLENCE (SRE)
BLOCK FUNDING (CONT‟)
- Base (20%)
- Amount is determined based on Performance Index against funding available
- Performance Index = Category 1 income in each HEPs against all eligible
HEPs (as a percentage)
- Category 1 income is the Average of two most recent years, i.e. 2007 & 2008
for 2010 allocation
- Same as RIBG
- Threshold 1 (13%)
- Performance Index as above, however,
- Capped at $2.5M
24
SUSTAINABLE RESEARCH EXCELLENCE (SRE)
BLOCK FUNDING (CONT‟)
- Threshold 2 Formula (67%)
- Initial Threshold 2 amount x Threshold 2 Moderator
- Initial Threshold 2 amount is:
• Performance Index, however, amount in excess of $2.5M
- Threshold 2 Moderator is:
• (1 + Mean of All HEPs‟ Threshold 2 Ratio – HEP‟s Threshold 2 Ratio)
- HEP‟s Threshold 2 ratio is:
• Research Active Staff FTE / Weight Publications
- In essence, the moderator is a factor which awards research productivity based
on Cat 1 income relative to other providers.
- The larger the ratio, the less Research Productive
25
SUSTAINABLE RESEARCH EXCELLENCE (SRE)
SHAREPOINT PROJECT
› SharePoint platform – a new automated request portal
- Creating new accounts
- Amending existing accounts
- Inactivating existing research/non-research accounts
› CHARTFIELD MAINTENANCE
26
SHAREPOINT PROJECT (CONT‟)
› CFR are working with ICT to design and implement a new
accounts request SharePoint system
› WHY?
- Separate account request procedures
- Requests come in many forms
- Simplify the process
- Clear on what Supporting documentation is required
› CHARTFIELD MAINTENANCE
27
SHAREPOINT PROJECT (CONT‟)
› Quantitative Benefits
- Reduce time to process requests (8 hrs per week by OCA/CFR)
- Reduce costs for OCA and CFR
› Qualitative Benefits
- Improve efficiency (mandatory fields credibility data)
- Secure online process (log in to check an online status)
› CHARTFIELD MAINTENANCE
28
SHAREPOINT PROJECT (CONT‟)
350 Non RIMS and 681 RIMS accounts were created in 2009
› CHARTFIELD MAINTENANCE – 2009 STATISTICS
29
SHAREPOINT PROJECT (CONT‟)
› INTERFACE
30
SHAREPOINT PROJECT (CONT‟)
› INTERFACE
31
SHAREPOINT PROJECT (CONT‟)
› INTERFACE
› You can check the status of the grant online
› Confirmation will be sent automatically from CFR generic email
address when project is set up in PeopleSoft
32
HERDC REPORT
› HERDC HYPERION REPORT
33
HERDC REPORT (CONT‟)
› NEW FUNCTION – EXPECTED INCOME IN FUTURE YEAR
34
HERDC REPORT (CONT‟)
› IMPROVEMENT FOR HERDC REPORT
› We are exploring possibilities to improve the report. Areas identified
are:
- Separate Reports for Research Income & Possible Research Income
- Drill Down Function (Link to Q104)
- Negative Income Report
35
PROCESS REVIEW
Promulgate research funding
Facilitate research funding
Support research
compliance
Support research
translation
Report research
performance
36
END-TO-END PROCESS REVIEW – DVCR INITIATIVE
› The project team has developed a set of high-level Research Management processes
› It has also reviewed the processes for „Directing Research‟, including the university‟s policies
› It has worked with stakeholders across the University to identify high-level process maps of each of these processes
PROCESS REVIEW (CONT‟)
Promulgate research funding
Facilitate research funding
Support research
compliance
Support research
translation
Report research
performance
37
END-TO-END PROCESS REVIEW – DVCR INITIATIVE
› CFR has provided a
perspective and input on the
process
› We also involve in:
› Research Policy
› Other directing processes
LAST BUT NOT LEAST
› http://www.finance.usyd.edu.au/about/research.shtml
› Information you can find:
- DVC Research Internal Schemes
- NHMRC, ARC, HERDC templates
- Research Account information
- Block Grant Guidelines
- Presentations (PowerPoint Slides)
- Contacts
38
CFR WEBSITE
LAST BUT NOT LEAST
THANK YOU!
39