Demonstrating value in tough times: an introduction to economic analysis
description
Transcript of Demonstrating value in tough times: an introduction to economic analysis
Demonstrating value in tough times: an introduction to economic analysis
Fraser Battye Deirdre O’Brien
8th December 2011
This workshop is structured around five propositions. It covers theory first, then practice; we end with an exercise
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
Our aim is to be non-technical and informal – please ask questions at any point
1. We want more than we can have: we must prioritise
2. We should prioritise so as to get most social ‘good’
3. Economic analysis aids prioritisation
4. There are a range of approaches you can use, each has pros and cons. (SROI might be suitable here)
5. Economic analysis should form part of a case, alongside other types of evidence
Before we get going, here’s a quick three-point guide to the territory
1. A great quote
2. A bad joke
3. The monetary value of human life
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
The great quote
“It is the mark of an educated mind to rest satisfied with the degree of precision which the nature of the subject admits and not to seek exactness where only an approximation is possible”
Aristotle
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
We might not achieve precision. Services and problems are complex; the evidence always incomplete.
What we always get is a useful and robust set of concepts.
The bad joke
Q: How many economists does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Two. One to assume the existence of a ladder, and one to change the bulb
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
Complexity and incomplete evidence aren’t necessarily fatal to economic analysis - but they leave us relying on assumptions. Be clear what they are
2. Practice1. Theory 3. ExampleAgenda
The ‘economic problem’ is our starting point: we have unlimited wants, but resources are finite
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
Because we can’t have everything we want, we must make ‘trade-offs’. This leads to ‘opportunity cost’
• Buyers must trade-off alternatives, e.g.:– Should we invest in drugs or community-based services?– In Children’s Centres or universities?– In training for the unemployed or aid programmes?
• By choosing something, we forgo something else
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
Opportunity cost = the value of the next best alternative
Examples of opportunity cost: how many of these could have been bought instead of a year of war in Afghanistan?
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
Senior nurse
A&E attendance
Smoking quit (deprived group)
Year in average UK care home
Healthy school dinners
So, we need to allocate our limited resources to achieve maximise value...but how?
• Allocation under a free market:– Private decision making; consumers and producers;
supply and demand– Prices convey information (VFM is easy!)
• But, some goods / services not left to a market– Here the problem is one of allocating public
resources for the greatest public ‘good’
• This is not a new problem– But current problems have sharpened the
emphasis...
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
Economic analysis aids resource allocation by systematically comparing costs and benefits
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
COSTS
Resources consumed
BENEFITS
Outcomes resulting
Activities
A range of interventions can then be compared and the most efficient ones prioritised – we get the greatest good for available resources
Logic models are a great starting point for economic analysis. They help you to describe costs and benefits
2. Practice1. TheoryAgendaCOSTS BENEFITS
Data collection then flows from this
Once you have the data, there are two main ‘types’ of analysis, distinguished by the way they express benefits
Costs are measured in monetary units for all types of analysis
1. Where benefits are expressed in ‘natural’ units
• Cost-consequence• Cost-effectiveness• Cost-utility
2. Where benefits are expressed in monetary units
• Cost-benefit• Social Return on Investment
£ per improvement in mental health
£ per QALY
£ per reduction in domestic violence
Little philosophical distinction – but often significant technical
differences
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
‘Cost’ is the value of resources consumed (more than just cash spent). So, what did this 2nd hand bike cost?
“The real price of every thing...is the toil and trouble of acquiring it”
Adam Smith
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
For Cost-Benefit or SROI analysis, benefits are measured (as far as possible) monetarily
• This is a significant advantage, results can be shown as a ratio:– ‘For every £1 of cost, you get £x worth of benefits’– Enables comparison across wider range of interventions
• It is also tricky: how do you value ‘intangible’ / social benefits in £?– What is the £ value of: being free of fear / living near a nice
park / gaining a qualification / having a nice view / having a spouse / good education / better mental health etc.
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
It might not always be possible. If not, quantify but don’t monetise
There are a range of ways to monetise social benefits - each has pros and cons
• Cost of poor outcomes avoided (e.g. reductions in GP appointments / use of acute care etc)
• Actual spending on similar benefits (e.g. paying for improved mental health)
• Willingness to pay / accept (hypothetical)
• Human capital (value of time)
• Court awards (e.g. for emotional distress / injury)
The best place to start looking is existing literature
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
Remember: 1) value is subjective, and 2) you do this all the time
Q: What is this T-shirt worth? A: It depends...what are you willing to pay? What are sellers willing to accept?
There is no such thing as an ‘objective’ value
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
‘Social’ value is also a mainstream concern...
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
Coffee break
There are five main steps in undertaking your analysis; your task is to apply the first four to the example project
1. Setting the perspective is vital: – Costs and benefits to whom? The state? The commissioning
organisation? Society as a whole?
2. The time-frame is too: – A year? Three years? Five years? 20 years?– The further out you go, the less certain you can be
3. Costs relatively easy to work out
2. Benefits are more difficult. Two challenges:– Getting good outcome data (evaluation)– Valuing these outcomes (if doing CBA / SROI)
• Be clear about your assumptions / workings and sensitivity in the model
2. Practice1. TheoryAgenda
Many thanks for coming to this workshop.Please get in touch with any follow-up questions
0121 2338900
GHK is an independent, employee-owned research and consultancy firm.
We specialise in the analysis of public policy for a range of clients across government and the third sector.
For more information, visit: www.ghkint.com