Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months,...

50
Demographic Program Comparison Quick Reference Guide Rev. 10-03-12 C C o o m m p p a a r r i i s s o o n n : : C C e e n n s s u u s s B B u u r r e e a a u u D D e e m m o o g g r r a a p p h h i i c c P P r r o o g g r r a a m m s s D D e e c c e e n n n n i i a a l l C C e e n n s s u u s s P P o o p p u u l l a a t t i i o o n n E E s s t t i i m m a a t t e e s s P P r r o o g g r r a a m m A A m m e e r r i i c c a a n n C C o o m m m m u u n n i i t t y y S S u u r r v v e e y y Purpose / Uses Apportionment of seats in Congress Redistricting Allocation of Federal funding Planning at state and local levels Survey controls Allocate Federal funding intercensal yrs Denominators for statistical rates Planning at state and local levels Provide timely detailed demographic, social, economic, and housing data about the country’s communities every year. Temporal frame Pointintime Pointintime Period estimate Reference date April 1 Year ending in zero July 1 Intercensal years None. Estimates describe entire period, which may be: 1year (areas with 65,000 population plus) 3year (areas with 20,000 population plus) 5year period (all areas including ZCTAS, down to block group ) Periodicity Every 10 years (“snapshot”) Annual Ongoing survey Data collection every month (“video”) Burden on respondent Mandatory None Mandatory Authority Article I, Section 2 Constitution U.S. Code Title 13, Sections 141 and 193 Title 13, Section 181 U.S. Code Title 13, Sections 141 and 193 Methodology 100% enumeration Every resident, every housing unit, and every group quarters Vital records (from states) plus formulas for calculation of net migration Random sample from Master Address File: 3.54 million HUs/year (295,000/month) Increase from 2.9 million‐‐June 2011 mailout Modes of Personal contact Mail or drop off questionnaire; personal visit followup to nonresponding addresses No contact with residents. Census Bureau headquarters works with individual states Mail Telephone Personal visit Management hub(s) Temporary Regional Census Centers Census Headquarters Census Regional Offices (6) D D a a t t a a Output Counts Counts Characteristics Topics Age Sex Race and ethnicity, Household relationships Tenure (own or rent home) U.S., state, county totals: Age, sex race, ethnicity, housing Incorporated place totals: Population only See Quick Reference Guide : “American Community Survey Data Release Timetable, Topics Covered by the ACS” Lowest level of release Block Incorporated place Block group

Transcript of Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months,...

Page 1: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Demographic Program Comparison Quick Reference Guide

Rev. 10-03-12

CCoommppaarriissoonn::    CCeennssuuss  BBuurreeaauu  DDeemmooggrraapphhiicc  PPrrooggrraammss  

   DDeecceennnniiaall  CCeennssuuss   PPooppuullaattiioonn  EEssttiimmaatteess  PPrrooggrraamm   AAmmeerriiccaann  CCoommmmuunniittyy  SSuurrvveeyy  

  Purpose / Uses 

Apportionment of seats in Congress Redistricting Allocation of Federal funding Planning at state and local levels 

Survey controls Allocate Federal funding intercensal  yrs Denominators for statistical rates Planning at state and local levels 

Provide timely detailed demographic, social, economic, and housing data about the country’s communities every year. 

Temporal frame  Point‐in‐time  Point‐in‐time  Period estimate  Reference date 

April 1 Year ending in zero 

July 1 Intercensal years 

None.  Estimates describe entire period, which may be: 1‐year (areas with 65,000 population plus)  3‐year (areas with 20,000 population plus) 5‐year period (all areas including ZCTAS, down to block group ) 

 Periodicity 

 Every 10 years (“snapshot”) 

 Annual 

Ongoing  survey Data collection every month (“video”) 

Burden on respondent  Mandatory  None  Mandatory  Authority 

Article I, Section 2 Constitution U.S. Code Title 13, Sections 141 and 193 

Title 13, Section 181  U.S. Code Title 13, Sections 141 and 193 

 Methodology 

100% enumeration  Every resident, every housing unit,  and     every group quarters 

Vital records (from states)  plus formulas for calculation of  net migration  

Random sample from Master Address File: 3.54 million HUs/year (295,000/month) Increase from 2.9 million‐‐June 2011 mailout 

Modes of  Personal contact 

Mail or drop off questionnaire;  personal visit follow‐up to non‐responding addresses 

No contact with residents.  Census Bureau headquarters works with individual states 

Mail Telephone  Personal visit 

Management hub(s)  Temporary Regional Census Centers   Census Headquarters  Census Regional Offices (6) 

DDaattaaOutput  Counts  Counts  Characteristics   Topics 

Age Sex Race and ethnicity, Household relationships Tenure (own or rent home) 

U.S., state, county totals: Age, sex race, ethnicity, housing   Incorporated place totals: Population only 

See Quick Reference Guide :  

“American Community Survey Data Release Timetable, Topics Covered by the ACS” 

 Lowest level of release  Block  Incorporated place  Block group  

Page 2: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Census Geography Hierarchy (with 2010 Statistical Area Criteria)

Revised 10-31-12

• 1,200 to 8,000 population (optimum 4,000) • 480 to 3,200 housing units

• 600 to 3,000 population • 240 to 1,200 housing units

Central axis describes a nesting relationship

• Cities and towns -- incorporated • Census Designated Places (CDPs): - - Unincorporated; no size threshold - - Separate and distinct from city/town - - Redefined each census

• Blocks not defined by population • Lowest geographic level for data

ACS lowest release -- on

FTP only

Block level data only for Decennial Census

Page 3: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Quick Reference Guide Rev. 10-03-12

U.S. Census Bureau:  Demographic Program Tips  

(1)   2010 Decennial Census (100% count of population & housing) 

 Data:  Released down to the block level (richest geographic detail) every 10 years Topics covered: 

1.  Age    4.  Hispanic origin 2.  Sex    5.  Relationship of each individual in household to first person listed on form 3.  Race   6.  Tenure (home ownership with /without mortgage, rented, or occupied without rent)  

  

(2)   Population Estimates Program (PEP) (Derived from administrative records and net migration formulas in the intercensal years)  

  Data released annually on the following topics and geographic levels: 

• U.S., states, counties: Housing and population totals, characteristics (age, sex, race, ethnicity)  • Incorporated places:   Population totals only 

  

(3)   American Community Survey (ACS)  (Survey covering ~ 3.54 million housing units/year nationwide)  

      

    ACS data products released every year.  Population thresholds (all surveyed addresses are unique within any 5‐year period) 

• 1‐year estimates:  65,000 or more • 3‐year estimates:  20,000 or more • 5‐year estimates:  All geographic areas below 20,000, including all census tracts and all block groups.   

ZCTAS will first be released in 2012, with the 5‐year ACS 2007‐2011 estimates.    Population controls are from the Population Estimates Program  

• One‐year ACS estimates are controlled to the PEP estimates as of July 1 of the tabulated year • Multiyear ACS population and housing estimates are controlled to the average of the individual year’s 

population and housing estimates (from the PEP)  Constructing ACS estimates 

• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) • Appropriate weights are assigned for housing and population estimates (from the PEP) 

The ACS is designed to measure the characteristics of the population, not counts of the population.  The official estimates of the population still come from the previous census and from the Census Bureau’s 

Population Estimates Program (or PEP).  

The ACS estimates describe characteristics of a population over a period, while the Decennial Census and the Population Estimates Program are point‐in‐time (April 1 and July 1, respectively) estimates. 

 The ACS generally does a better job estimating percents, rates, means, and medians than it does totals. 

Page 4: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Quick Reference Guide Rev. 10-03-12

Comparing ACS estimates with Census data • Comparisons can be made for most population and housing subjects   • Global differences (residence rules, universes, and reference periods) exist between the ACS and the 

decennial census, and some items cannot be compared at all • For more information, see 

http://www.census.gov/acs/www/guidance_for_data_users/comparing_data/  Comparing two or more ACS estimates across different geographic areas  

• Use the same length time period (1‐year ACS estimate to other 1‐year ACS estimate, and so on) • Use the same time period when making comparisons (2008‐2010 to 2008‐2010, for instance) 

 Comparing two or more ACS estimates for one geographic area across time 

• Use the same length time period • Try to compare non‐overlapping periods; statistical testing is more straightforward (See Compass Guide) • Use caution if geographic boundaries have changed over time 

 Dollar‐valued (or dollar‐denominated) estimates in multiyear estimates  

• Income • Rent • Home values • Energy costs 

Estimates are adjusted for inflation to the most recent year, using inflation factors based on the Consumer Price Index (or CPI).  A similar adjustment is also done for individual months within a one‐year estimate.  Inflation adjustment is designed to put the collected data into dollars of equal value.   Geographic boundaries in multiyear estimates 

• Based on geographic boundaries as of January 1 of the last year in the multi‐year period.  • Census Bureau’s annual Boundary Annexation Survey (or BAS) collects information about the following 

legally defined geographic areas: o Counties or county‐equivalents o Incorporated places  o Federally‐recognized American Indian areas 

• Boundaries of other statistical areas (such as census tracts, block groups, urbanized areas, PUMAs) are updated every decade in conjunction with the decennial census 

 ACS 5‐year estimates 

• Released every year, dropping the oldest year and adding the most recent • For most areas, no population thresholds; there are some disclosure‐related release restrictions, most of 

which apply only to block groups • Data user must look at the margins of error (MOEs)! • Are not filtered based on the reliability of the estimates; many published estimates are unreliable ‐ ‐ 

decision to release these data driven by the need to provide building blocks for users to aggregate and to be certain even the smallest areas receive data (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator) 

• Excluded data products:  Comparison Profiles and Ranking Tables • First releases:  (using 2006‐2010 estimates) 5‐year Selected Population Tables and 5‐year AIAN Tables 

(similar to 2000 Summary File 4) and (using 2007‐2011 estimates ‐ ‐ Dec 2012) Zip Code Tabulation Areas  • Census block group estimates: 

o Not displayed as tables in American FactFinder (AFF) for the casual data user o Released only in summary file format, accessible from the FTP site (AFF Main tab)  

Page 5: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

DP02 SELECTED SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS IN THE UNITED STATES

2012 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Surveywebsite in the Data and Documentation section.

Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American CommunitySurvey website in the Methodology section.

Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, it is the Census Bureau's PopulationEstimates Program that produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns andestimates of housing units for states and counties.

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE

    Total households 1,079,653 +/-5,725 1,079,653 (X)  Family households (families) 715,981 +/-9,138 66.3% +/-0.8      With own children under 18 years 329,104 +/-7,008 30.5% +/-0.6    Married-couple family 527,784 +/-8,814 48.9% +/-0.7      With own children under 18 years 233,849 +/-6,641 21.7% +/-0.6    Male householder, no wife present, family 55,808 +/-4,251 5.2% +/-0.4      With own children under 18 years 25,385 +/-3,198 2.4% +/-0.3    Female householder, no husband present, family 132,389 +/-4,785 12.3% +/-0.4      With own children under 18 years 69,870 +/-3,373 6.5% +/-0.3  Nonfamily households 363,672 +/-8,241 33.7% +/-0.8    Householder living alone 267,714 +/-8,189 24.8% +/-0.8      65 years and over 92,437 +/-3,984 8.6% +/-0.4

  Households with one or more people under 18 years 363,743 +/-7,107 33.7% +/-0.6

  Households with one or more people 65 years and over 263,278 +/-2,973 24.4% +/-0.3

  Average household size 2.86 +/-0.01 (X) (X)  Average family size 3.47 +/-0.03 (X) (X)

RELATIONSHIP

    Population in households 3,087,151 +/-3,857 3,087,151 (X)  Householder 1,079,653 +/-5,725 35.0% +/-0.2  Spouse 526,848 +/-8,840 17.1% +/-0.3  Child 969,986 +/-9,407 31.4% +/-0.3  Other relatives 272,800 +/-11,537 8.8% +/-0.4  Nonrelatives 237,864 +/-11,637 7.7% +/-0.4    Unmarried partner 68,678 +/-4,124 2.2% +/-0.1

MARITAL STATUS

    Males 15 years and over 1,288,315 +/-354 1,288,315 (X)  Never married 520,452 +/-8,401 40.4% +/-0.7  Now married, except separated 610,262 +/-9,952 47.4% +/-0.8  Separated 19,068 +/-2,041 1.5% +/-0.2  Widowed 27,014 +/-2,390 2.1% +/-0.2

1 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 6: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

  Divorced 111,519 +/-5,749 8.7% +/-0.4

    Females 15 years and over 1,286,242 +/-353 1,286,242 (X)  Never married 409,306 +/-7,105 31.8% +/-0.6  Now married, except separated 590,021 +/-9,961 45.9% +/-0.8  Separated 29,548 +/-2,521 2.3% +/-0.2  Widowed 103,246 +/-4,338 8.0% +/-0.3  Divorced 154,121 +/-5,991 12.0% +/-0.5

FERTILITY

    Number of women 15 to 50 years old who had a birthin the past 12 months

41,104 +/-3,250 41,104 (X)

  Unmarried women (widowed, divorced, and nevermarried)

8,943 +/-1,644 21.8% +/-3.7

    Per 1,000 unmarried women 20 +/-4 (X) (X)  Per 1,000 women 15 to 50 years old 51 +/-4 (X) (X)    Per 1,000 women 15 to 19 years old 14 +/-7 (X) (X)    Per 1,000 women 20 to 34 years old 82 +/-8 (X) (X)    Per 1,000 women 35 to 50 years old 29 +/-4 (X) (X)

GRANDPARENTS

    Number of grandparents living with own grandchildrenunder 18 years

80,149 +/-5,498 80,149 (X)

  Responsible for grandchildren 19,356 +/-2,254 24.2% +/-2.7    Years responsible for grandchildren

      Less than 1 year 3,813 +/-1,090 4.8% +/-1.3      1 or 2 years 4,641 +/-1,186 5.8% +/-1.4      3 or 4 years 2,957 +/-1,078 3.7% +/-1.3      5 or more years 7,945 +/-1,485 9.9% +/-1.9

    Number of grandparents responsible for owngrandchildren under 18 years

19,356 +/-2,254 19,356 (X)

  Who are female 12,148 +/-1,521 62.8% +/-3.4  Who are married 14,492 +/-2,139 74.9% +/-4.5

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT

    Population 3 years and over enrolled in school 869,641 +/-9,033 869,641 (X)  Nursery school, preschool 50,235 +/-3,752 5.8% +/-0.4  Kindergarten 38,303 +/-3,066 4.4% +/-0.4  Elementary school (grades 1-8) 314,146 +/-4,128 36.1% +/-0.6  High school (grades 9-12) 170,289 +/-4,286 19.6% +/-0.5  College or graduate school 296,668 +/-8,999 34.1% +/-0.8

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

    Population 25 years and over 2,079,795 ***** 2,079,795 (X)  Less than 9th grade 152,824 +/-7,302 7.3% +/-0.4  9th to 12th grade, no diploma 137,086 +/-6,470 6.6% +/-0.3  High school graduate (includes equivalency) 398,016 +/-9,858 19.1% +/-0.5  Some college, no degree 457,624 +/-10,517 22.0% +/-0.5  Associate's degree 211,426 +/-7,999 10.2% +/-0.4  Bachelor's degree 446,573 +/-9,382 21.5% +/-0.5  Graduate or professional degree 276,246 +/-9,122 13.3% +/-0.4

  Percent high school graduate or higher (X) (X) 86.1% +/-0.4  Percent bachelor's degree or higher (X) (X) 34.8% +/-0.5

VETERAN STATUS

    Civilian population 18 years and over 2,371,700 +/-4,146 2,371,700 (X)  Civilian veterans 233,892 +/-6,624 9.9% +/-0.3

2 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 7: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

DISABILITY STATUS OF THE CIVILIANNONINSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION    Total Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population 3,073,012 +/-4,620 3,073,012 (X)  With a disability 293,826 +/-8,599 9.6% +/-0.3

    Under 18 years 724,211 +/-717 724,211 (X)  With a disability 18,507 +/-2,312 2.6% +/-0.3

    18 to 64 years 1,977,089 +/-4,406 1,977,089 (X)  With a disability 138,660 +/-6,912 7.0% +/-0.3

    65 years and over 371,712 +/-1,204 371,712 (X)  With a disability 136,659 +/-4,420 36.8% +/-1.2

RESIDENCE 1 YEAR AGO

    Population 1 year and over 3,138,139 +/-3,174 3,138,139 (X)  Same house 2,644,405 +/-20,456 84.3% +/-0.7  Different house in the U.S. 464,091 +/-19,497 14.8% +/-0.6    Same county 336,887 +/-16,746 10.7% +/-0.5    Different county 127,204 +/-10,012 4.1% +/-0.3      Same state 57,881 +/-6,988 1.8% +/-0.2      Different state 69,323 +/-6,896 2.2% +/-0.2  Abroad 29,643 +/-5,202 0.9% +/-0.2

PLACE OF BIRTH

    Total population 3,177,063 ***** 3,177,063 (X)  Native 2,439,492 +/-14,605 76.8% +/-0.5    Born in United States 2,384,352 +/-13,879 75.0% +/-0.4      State of residence 1,550,084 +/-18,593 48.8% +/-0.6      Different state 834,268 +/-15,892 26.3% +/-0.5    Born in Puerto Rico, U.S. Island areas, or born abroadto American parent(s)

55,140 +/-5,235 1.7% +/-0.2

  Foreign born 737,571 +/-14,605 23.2% +/-0.5

U.S. CITIZENSHIP STATUS

    Foreign-born population 737,571 +/-14,605 737,571 (X)  Naturalized U.S. citizen 357,206 +/-9,282 48.4% +/-1.1  Not a U.S. citizen 380,365 +/-12,574 51.6% +/-1.1

YEAR OF ENTRY

    Population born outside the United States 792,711 +/-13,879 792,711 (X)

    Native 55,140 +/-5,235 55,140 (X)  Entered 2010 or later 4,096 +/-1,284 7.4% +/-2.1  Entered before 2010 51,044 +/-4,738 92.6% +/-2.1

    Foreign born 737,571 +/-14,605 737,571 (X)  Entered 2010 or later 45,140 +/-4,980 6.1% +/-0.6  Entered before 2010 692,431 +/-13,591 93.9% +/-0.6

WORLD REGION OF BIRTH OF FOREIGN BORN

    Foreign-born population, excluding population born atsea

737,571 +/-14,605 737,571 (X)

  Europe 63,052 +/-5,281 8.5% +/-0.7  Asia 273,920 +/-6,955 37.1% +/-0.8  Africa 16,244 +/-3,244 2.2% +/-0.4  Oceania 4,876 +/-1,384 0.7% +/-0.2  Latin America 365,819 +/-10,165 49.6% +/-0.9  Northern America 13,660 +/-2,300 1.9% +/-0.3

3 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 8: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME

    Population 5 years and over 2,968,342 ***** 2,968,342 (X)  English only 1,847,404 +/-17,079 62.2% +/-0.6  Language other than English 1,120,938 +/-17,079 37.8% +/-0.6      Speak English less than "very well" 462,735 +/-13,861 15.6% +/-0.5    Spanish 740,502 +/-13,255 24.9% +/-0.4      Speak English less than "very well" 307,785 +/-11,673 10.4% +/-0.4    Other Indo-European languages 96,373 +/-8,346 3.2% +/-0.3      Speak English less than "very well" 27,215 +/-3,486 0.9% +/-0.1    Asian and Pacific Islander languages 241,292 +/-7,434 8.1% +/-0.3      Speak English less than "very well" 106,935 +/-5,515 3.6% +/-0.2    Other languages 42,771 +/-5,557 1.4% +/-0.2      Speak English less than "very well" 20,800 +/-4,076 0.7% +/-0.1

ANCESTRY

    Total population 3,177,063 ***** 3,177,063 (X)  American 110,249 +/-7,798 3.5% +/-0.2  Arab 35,060 +/-6,118 1.1% +/-0.2  Czech 10,479 +/-1,958 0.3% +/-0.1  Danish 14,452 +/-2,918 0.5% +/-0.1  Dutch 29,235 +/-3,650 0.9% +/-0.1  English 258,722 +/-11,087 8.1% +/-0.3  French (except Basque) 71,122 +/-6,319 2.2% +/-0.2  French Canadian 9,729 +/-1,597 0.3% +/-0.1  German 334,841 +/-10,728 10.5% +/-0.3  Greek 8,717 +/-1,910 0.3% +/-0.1  Hungarian 12,767 +/-2,748 0.4% +/-0.1  Irish 263,391 +/-10,157 8.3% +/-0.3  Italian 139,227 +/-8,808 4.4% +/-0.3  Lithuanian 4,005 +/-1,058 0.1% +/-0.1  Norwegian 37,309 +/-3,858 1.2% +/-0.1  Polish 57,266 +/-5,007 1.8% +/-0.2  Portuguese 17,613 +/-2,889 0.6% +/-0.1  Russian 30,979 +/-4,150 1.0% +/-0.1  Scotch-Irish 21,484 +/-2,522 0.7% +/-0.1  Scottish 44,673 +/-4,582 1.4% +/-0.1  Slovak 3,236 +/-1,001 0.1% +/-0.1  Subsaharan African 18,605 +/-4,144 0.6% +/-0.1  Swedish 43,111 +/-4,508 1.4% +/-0.1  Swiss 8,043 +/-1,911 0.3% +/-0.1  Ukrainian 7,362 +/-1,584 0.2% +/-0.1  Welsh 18,252 +/-3,715 0.6% +/-0.1  West Indian (excluding Hispanic origin groups) 7,006 +/-1,838 0.2% +/-0.1

Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability isrepresented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpretedroughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin oferror (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject tononsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in thesetables.

Ancestry listed in this table refers to the total number of people who responded with a particular ancestry; for example, the estimate given for Russianrepresents the number of people who listed Russian as either their first or second ancestry. This table lists only the largest ancestry groups; see theDetailed Tables for more categories. Race and Hispanic origin groups are not included in this table because official data for those groups come fromthe Race and Hispanic origin questions rather than the ancestry question (see Demographic Table).

Data for year of entry of the native population reflect the year of entry into the U.S. by people who were born in Puerto Rico, U.S. Island Areas or bornoutside the U.S. to a U.S. citizen parent and who subsequently moved to the U.S.

4 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 9: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Fertility data are not available for certain geographic areas due to problems with data collection. See Errata Note #92 for details.

The Census Bureau introduced a new set of disability questions in the 2008 ACS questionnaire. Accordingly, comparisons of disability data from 2008or later with data from prior years are not recommended. For more information on these questions and their evaluation in the 2006 ACS Content Test,see the Evaluation Report Covering Disability.

While the 2012 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions ofmetropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables maydiffer from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.

Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data.Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarilyreflect the results of ongoing urbanization.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 American Community Survey

Explanation of Symbols:

1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available tocompute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate. 2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute anestimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of anopen-ended distribution. 3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution. 4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. Astatistical test is not appropriate. 6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. 7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number ofsample cases is too small. 8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available.

Page 10: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

DP03 SELECTED ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

2012 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Surveywebsite in the Data and Documentation section.

Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American CommunitySurvey website in the Methodology section.

Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, it is the Census Bureau's PopulationEstimates Program that produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns andestimates of housing units for states and counties.

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

EMPLOYMENT STATUS

      Population 16 years and over 2,536,682 +/-2,419 2,536,682 (X)  In labor force 1,642,502 +/-13,054 64.8% +/-0.5    Civilian labor force 1,563,286 +/-13,508 61.6% +/-0.5      Employed 1,412,983 +/-13,046 55.7% +/-0.5      Unemployed 150,303 +/-6,398 5.9% +/-0.3    Armed Forces 79,216 +/-4,114 3.1% +/-0.2  Not in labor force 894,180 +/-13,272 35.2% +/-0.5

    Civilian labor force 1,563,286 +/-13,508 1,563,286 (X)  Percent Unemployed (X) (X) 9.6% +/-0.4

    Females 16 years and over 1,267,281 +/-1,815 1,267,281 (X)  In labor force 733,772 +/-8,755 57.9% +/-0.7    Civilian labor force 726,183 +/-8,949 57.3% +/-0.7      Employed 660,654 +/-8,562 52.1% +/-0.7

    Own children under 6 years 243,797 +/-3,749 243,797 (X)  All parents in family in labor force 142,950 +/-5,540 58.6% +/-2.0

    Own children 6 to 17 years 452,472 +/-5,302 452,472 (X)  All parents in family in labor force 298,181 +/-8,077 65.9% +/-1.5

COMMUTING TO WORK

    Workers 16 years and over 1,457,139 +/-13,277 1,457,139 (X)  Car, truck, or van -- drove alone 1,109,948 +/-12,201 76.2% +/-0.6  Car, truck, or van -- carpooled 143,979 +/-7,722 9.9% +/-0.5  Public transportation (excluding taxicab) 40,621 +/-3,518 2.8% +/-0.2  Walked 38,766 +/-3,855 2.7% +/-0.3  Other means 27,846 +/-3,004 1.9% +/-0.2  Worked at home 95,979 +/-5,413 6.6% +/-0.4

  Mean travel time to work (minutes) 24.6 +/-0.3 (X) (X)

OCCUPATION

    Civilian employed population 16 years and over 1,412,983 +/-13,046 1,412,983 (X)

1 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 11: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

  Management, business, science, and arts occupations 566,857 +/-10,661 40.1% +/-0.7

  Service occupations 281,528 +/-10,196 19.9% +/-0.7  Sales and office occupations 335,464 +/-11,026 23.7% +/-0.7  Natural resources, construction, and maintenanceoccupations

111,977 +/-5,961 7.9% +/-0.4

  Production, transportation, and material movingoccupations

117,157 +/-5,773 8.3% +/-0.4

INDUSTRY

    Civilian employed population 16 years and over 1,412,983 +/-13,046 1,412,983 (X)  Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 13,688 +/-3,010 1.0% +/-0.2

  Construction 79,899 +/-5,110 5.7% +/-0.4  Manufacturing 134,382 +/-6,441 9.5% +/-0.4  Wholesale trade 30,368 +/-3,158 2.1% +/-0.2  Retail trade 158,234 +/-6,149 11.2% +/-0.4  Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 54,032 +/-4,341 3.8% +/-0.3  Information 33,832 +/-3,444 2.4% +/-0.2  Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental andleasing

92,003 +/-6,027 6.5% +/-0.4

  Professional, scientific, and management, andadministrative and waste management services

204,296 +/-7,294 14.5% +/-0.5

  Educational services, and health care and socialassistance

301,559 +/-8,049 21.3% +/-0.5

  Arts, entertainment, and recreation, andaccommodation and food services

158,008 +/-7,212 11.2% +/-0.5

  Other services, except public administration 77,018 +/-5,073 5.5% +/-0.4  Public administration 75,664 +/-4,484 5.4% +/-0.3

CLASS OF WORKER

    Civilian employed population 16 years and over 1,412,983 +/-13,046 1,412,983 (X)  Private wage and salary workers 1,096,196 +/-13,794 77.6% +/-0.6  Government workers 207,193 +/-6,752 14.7% +/-0.5  Self-employed in own not incorporated businessworkers

107,880 +/-5,729 7.6% +/-0.4

  Unpaid family workers 1,714 +/-735 0.1% +/-0.1

INCOME AND BENEFITS (IN 2012 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS)    Total households 1,079,653 +/-5,725 1,079,653 (X)  Less than $10,000 72,365 +/-4,425 6.7% +/-0.4  $10,000 to $14,999 48,361 +/-3,372 4.5% +/-0.3  $15,000 to $24,999 99,476 +/-5,057 9.2% +/-0.5  $25,000 to $34,999 100,677 +/-4,391 9.3% +/-0.4  $35,000 to $49,999 134,299 +/-4,639 12.4% +/-0.4  $50,000 to $74,999 186,366 +/-6,566 17.3% +/-0.6  $75,000 to $99,999 137,522 +/-4,948 12.7% +/-0.5  $100,000 to $149,999 158,802 +/-5,226 14.7% +/-0.5  $150,000 to $199,999 75,477 +/-4,498 7.0% +/-0.4  $200,000 or more 66,308 +/-3,985 6.1% +/-0.4  Median household income (dollars) 60,330 +/-911 (X) (X)  Mean household income (dollars) 81,326 +/-1,171 (X) (X)

  With earnings 859,223 +/-7,854 79.6% +/-0.6    Mean earnings (dollars) 81,812 +/-1,305 (X) (X)  With Social Security 264,018 +/-4,525 24.5% +/-0.4    Mean Social Security income (dollars) 16,550 +/-287 (X) (X)  With retirement income 187,158 +/-5,562 17.3% +/-0.5    Mean retirement income (dollars) 28,193 +/-971 (X) (X)

  With Supplemental Security Income 50,339 +/-3,685 4.7% +/-0.3    Mean Supplemental Security Income (dollars) 9,598 +/-348 (X) (X)  With cash public assistance income 34,184 +/-2,945 3.2% +/-0.3

2 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 12: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

    Mean cash public assistance income (dollars) 5,069 +/-339 (X) (X)  With Food Stamp/SNAP benefits in the past 12 months 69,420 +/-3,508 6.4% +/-0.3

    Families 715,981 +/-9,138 715,981 (X)  Less than $10,000 38,028 +/-3,241 5.3% +/-0.4  $10,000 to $14,999 19,517 +/-1,943 2.7% +/-0.3  $15,000 to $24,999 55,365 +/-3,653 7.7% +/-0.5  $25,000 to $34,999 58,389 +/-3,312 8.2% +/-0.5  $35,000 to $49,999 88,899 +/-4,337 12.4% +/-0.6  $50,000 to $74,999 123,725 +/-5,848 17.3% +/-0.8  $75,000 to $99,999 96,072 +/-4,193 13.4% +/-0.6  $100,000 to $149,999 123,282 +/-5,140 17.2% +/-0.7  $150,000 to $199,999 57,708 +/-3,678 8.1% +/-0.5  $200,000 or more 54,996 +/-3,514 7.7% +/-0.5  Median family income (dollars) 69,364 +/-1,639 (X) (X)  Mean family income (dollars) 91,024 +/-1,563 (X) (X)

  Per capita income (dollars) 29,281 +/-381 (X) (X)

    Nonfamily households 363,672 +/-8,241 363,672 (X)  Median nonfamily income (dollars) 41,534 +/-1,293 (X) (X)  Mean nonfamily income (dollars) 58,140 +/-1,680 (X) (X)

  Median earnings for workers (dollars) 31,055 +/-346 (X) (X)  Median earnings for male full-time, year-round workers(dollars)

50,249 +/-616 (X) (X)

  Median earnings for female full-time, year-roundworkers (dollars)

41,164 +/-627 (X) (X)

HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE

    Civilian noninstitutionalized population 3,073,012 +/-4,620 3,073,012 (X)  With health insurance coverage 2,551,626 +/-19,130 83.0% +/-0.6    With private health insurance 2,000,796 +/-21,181 65.1% +/-0.7    With public coverage 823,733 +/-16,613 26.8% +/-0.5  No health insurance coverage 521,386 +/-19,309 17.0% +/-0.6

    Civilian noninstitutionalized population under 18 years 724,211 +/-717 724,211 (X)

  No health insurance coverage 65,103 +/-6,536 9.0% +/-0.9

    Civilian noninstitutionalized population 18 to 64 years 1,977,089 +/-4,406 1,977,089 (X)

  In labor force: 1,489,032 +/-11,771 1,489,032 (X)    Employed: 1,347,462 +/-11,544 1,347,462 (X)      With health insurance coverage 1,077,997 +/-14,425 80.0% +/-0.8        With private health insurance 1,026,725 +/-14,071 76.2% +/-0.8        With public coverage 82,164 +/-5,420 6.1% +/-0.4      No health insurance coverage 269,465 +/-11,548 20.0% +/-0.8    Unemployed: 141,570 +/-6,313 141,570 (X)      With health insurance coverage 76,359 +/-4,216 53.9% +/-2.6        With private health insurance 54,406 +/-3,814 38.4% +/-2.4        With public coverage 25,821 +/-2,213 18.2% +/-1.6      No health insurance coverage 65,211 +/-5,251 46.1% +/-2.6  Not in labor force: 488,057 +/-11,701 488,057 (X)      With health insurance coverage 372,363 +/-11,978 76.3% +/-1.3        With private health insurance 273,539 +/-10,262 56.0% +/-1.4        With public coverage 122,393 +/-5,794 25.1% +/-1.1      No health insurance coverage 115,694 +/-6,061 23.7% +/-1.3

3 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 13: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES AND PEOPLE WHOSEINCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS IS BELOW THEPOVERTY LEVEL  All families (X) (X) 11.5% +/-0.6    With related children under 18 years (X) (X) 16.7% +/-1.0      With related children under 5 years only (X) (X) 12.6% +/-2.2  Married couple families (X) (X) 7.7% +/-0.6    With related children under 18 years (X) (X) 10.4% +/-1.1      With related children under 5 years only (X) (X) 5.4% +/-1.5  Families with female householder, no husband present (X) (X) 25.0% +/-1.8

    With related children under 18 years (X) (X) 34.2% +/-2.5      With related children under 5 years only (X) (X) 34.2% +/-7.5

  All people (X) (X) 15.0% +/-0.7  Under 18 years (X) (X) 19.8% +/-1.3    Related children under 18 years (X) (X) 19.5% +/-1.3      Related children under 5 years (X) (X) 18.8% +/-2.2      Related children 5 to 17 years (X) (X) 19.8% +/-1.5  18 years and over (X) (X) 13.6% +/-0.6    18 to 64 years (X) (X) 14.3% +/-0.6    65 years and over (X) (X) 9.5% +/-0.9  People in families (X) (X) 12.6% +/-0.7  Unrelated individuals 15 years and over (X) (X) 24.7% +/-1.2

Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability isrepresented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpretedroughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin oferror (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject tononsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in thesetables.

Employment and unemployment estimates may vary from the official labor force data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics because ofdifferences in survey design and data collection. For guidance on differences in employment and unemployment estimates from different sources goto Labor Force Guidance.

The Census Bureau introduced an improved sequence of labor force questions in the 2008 ACS questionnaire. Accordingly, we recommend usingcaution when making labor force data comparisons from 2008 or later with data from prior years. For more information on these questions and theirevaluation in the 2006 ACS Content Test, see the "Evaluation Report Covering Employment Status" athttp://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/methodology/content_test/P6a_Employment_Status.pdf, and the "Evaluation Report Covering WeeksWorked" at http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/methodology/content_test/P6b_Weeks_Worked_Final_Report.pdf. Additional information canalso be found at http://www.census.gov/people/laborforce/.

Workers include members of the Armed Forces and civilians who were at work last week.

Industry codes are 4-digit codes and are based on the North American Industry Classification System 2007. The Industry categories adhere to theguidelines issued in Clarification Memorandum No. 2, "NAICS Alternate Aggregation Structure for Use By U.S. Statistical Agencies," issued by theOffice of Management and Budget.

Occupation codes are 4-digit codes and are based on Standard Occupational Classification 2010.

The health insurance coverage category names were modified in 2010. See ACS Health Insurance Definitions for a list of the insurance typedefinitions.

While the 2012 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions ofmetropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables maydiffer from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.

Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data.Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarilyreflect the results of ongoing urbanization.

4 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 14: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 American Community Survey

Explanation of Symbols:

1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available tocompute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate. 2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute anestimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of anopen-ended distribution. 3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution. 4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. Astatistical test is not appropriate. 6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. 7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number ofsample cases is too small. 8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available.

Page 15: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

DP04 SELECTED HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS

2012 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Surveywebsite in the Data and Documentation section.

Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American CommunitySurvey website in the Methodology section.

Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, it is the Census Bureau's PopulationEstimates Program that produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns andestimates of housing units for states and counties.

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

HOUSING OCCUPANCY

    Total housing units 1,169,225 +/-1,389 1,169,225 (X)  Occupied housing units 1,079,653 +/-5,725 92.3% +/-0.5  Vacant housing units 89,572 +/-5,419 7.7% +/-0.5

  Homeowner vacancy rate 1.8 +/-0.4 (X) (X)  Rental vacancy rate 4.5 +/-0.5 (X) (X)

UNITS IN STRUCTURE

    Total housing units 1,169,225 +/-1,389 1,169,225 (X)  1-unit, detached 601,003 +/-7,914 51.4% +/-0.7  1-unit, attached 103,413 +/-5,205 8.8% +/-0.4  2 units 25,069 +/-2,941 2.1% +/-0.3  3 or 4 units 56,475 +/-3,928 4.8% +/-0.3  5 to 9 units 90,089 +/-4,923 7.7% +/-0.4  10 to 19 units 85,768 +/-4,470 7.3% +/-0.4  20 or more units 160,067 +/-5,242 13.7% +/-0.4  Mobile home 46,367 +/-3,005 4.0% +/-0.3  Boat, RV, van, etc. 974 +/-431 0.1% +/-0.1

YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT

    Total housing units 1,169,225 +/-1,389 1,169,225 (X)  Built 2010 or later 8,202 +/-1,393 0.7% +/-0.1  Built 2000 to 2009 136,778 +/-4,756 11.7% +/-0.4  Built 1990 to 1999 142,038 +/-5,964 12.1% +/-0.5  Built 1980 to 1989 230,167 +/-6,541 19.7% +/-0.6  Built 1970 to 1979 279,857 +/-6,096 23.9% +/-0.5  Built 1960 to 1969 146,927 +/-4,985 12.6% +/-0.4  Built 1950 to 1959 130,263 +/-4,933 11.1% +/-0.4  Built 1940 to 1949 44,000 +/-3,361 3.8% +/-0.3  Built 1939 or earlier 50,993 +/-3,366 4.4% +/-0.3

ROOMS

    Total housing units 1,169,225 +/-1,389 1,169,225 (X)  1 room 25,780 +/-2,864 2.2% +/-0.2  2 rooms 45,218 +/-3,914 3.9% +/-0.3

1 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 16: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

  3 rooms 156,328 +/-5,765 13.4% +/-0.5  4 rooms 229,769 +/-6,344 19.7% +/-0.5  5 rooms 219,200 +/-6,772 18.7% +/-0.6  6 rooms 176,706 +/-5,647 15.1% +/-0.5  7 rooms 119,964 +/-4,980 10.3% +/-0.4  8 rooms 88,780 +/-5,125 7.6% +/-0.4  9 rooms or more 107,480 +/-5,135 9.2% +/-0.4  Median rooms 5.1 +/-0.1 (X) (X)

BEDROOMS

    Total housing units 1,169,225 +/-1,389 1,169,225 (X)  No bedroom 29,763 +/-2,872 2.5% +/-0.2  1 bedroom 171,140 +/-6,512 14.6% +/-0.6  2 bedrooms 357,821 +/-6,762 30.6% +/-0.6  3 bedrooms 363,620 +/-7,911 31.1% +/-0.7  4 bedrooms 195,970 +/-5,820 16.8% +/-0.5  5 or more bedrooms 50,911 +/-3,585 4.4% +/-0.3

HOUSING TENURE

    Occupied housing units 1,079,653 +/-5,725 1,079,653 (X)  Owner-occupied 573,530 +/-6,642 53.1% +/-0.6  Renter-occupied 506,123 +/-7,464 46.9% +/-0.6

  Average household size of owner-occupied unit 2.87 +/-0.03 (X) (X)  Average household size of renter-occupied unit 2.85 +/-0.04 (X) (X)

YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT

    Occupied housing units 1,079,653 +/-5,725 1,079,653 (X)  Moved in 2010 or later 360,777 +/-6,997 33.4% +/-0.6  Moved in 2000 to 2009 414,711 +/-7,935 38.4% +/-0.7  Moved in 1990 to 1999 160,464 +/-5,080 14.9% +/-0.5  Moved in 1980 to 1989 72,171 +/-3,209 6.7% +/-0.3  Moved in 1970 to 1979 45,682 +/-2,492 4.2% +/-0.2  Moved in 1969 or earlier 25,848 +/-2,292 2.4% +/-0.2

VEHICLES AVAILABLE

    Occupied housing units 1,079,653 +/-5,725 1,079,653 (X)  No vehicles available 67,371 +/-3,649 6.2% +/-0.3  1 vehicle available 348,413 +/-7,937 32.3% +/-0.7  2 vehicles available 430,798 +/-8,138 39.9% +/-0.7  3 or more vehicles available 233,071 +/-5,578 21.6% +/-0.5

HOUSE HEATING FUEL

    Occupied housing units 1,079,653 +/-5,725 1,079,653 (X)  Utility gas 625,866 +/-8,631 58.0% +/-0.8  Bottled, tank, or LP gas 31,322 +/-2,133 2.9% +/-0.2  Electricity 367,225 +/-8,537 34.0% +/-0.8  Fuel oil, kerosene, etc. 538 +/-426 0.0% +/-0.1  Coal or coke 0 +/-197 0.0% +/-0.1  Wood 10,425 +/-1,371 1.0% +/-0.1  Solar energy 1,348 +/-423 0.1% +/-0.1  Other fuel 4,453 +/-1,012 0.4% +/-0.1  No fuel used 38,476 +/-3,343 3.6% +/-0.3

SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS

    Occupied housing units 1,079,653 +/-5,725 1,079,653 (X)  Lacking complete plumbing facilities 2,585 +/-953 0.2% +/-0.1  Lacking complete kitchen facilities 6,969 +/-1,332 0.6% +/-0.1  No telephone service available 32,408 +/-3,273 3.0% +/-0.3

2 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 17: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

OCCUPANTS PER ROOM

    Occupied housing units 1,079,653 +/-5,725 1,079,653 (X)  1.00 or less 1,012,227 +/-6,144 93.8% +/-0.4  1.01 to 1.50 44,538 +/-3,394 4.1% +/-0.3  1.51 or more 22,888 +/-2,466 2.1% +/-0.2

VALUE

    Owner-occupied units 573,530 +/-6,642 573,530 (X)  Less than $50,000 22,935 +/-1,991 4.0% +/-0.3  $50,000 to $99,999 15,530 +/-1,887 2.7% +/-0.3  $100,000 to $149,999 18,095 +/-1,803 3.2% +/-0.3  $150,000 to $199,999 27,883 +/-2,234 4.9% +/-0.4  $200,000 to $299,999 90,747 +/-4,027 15.8% +/-0.7  $300,000 to $499,999 217,933 +/-5,235 38.0% +/-0.8  $500,000 to $999,999 146,541 +/-5,287 25.6% +/-0.8  $1,000,000 or more 33,866 +/-2,687 5.9% +/-0.5  Median (dollars) 386,400 +/-3,606 (X) (X)

MORTGAGE STATUS

    Owner-occupied units 573,530 +/-6,642 573,530 (X)  Housing units with a mortgage 429,578 +/-7,221 74.9% +/-0.7  Housing units without a mortgage 143,952 +/-4,180 25.1% +/-0.7

SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS (SMOC)

    Housing units with a mortgage 429,578 +/-7,221 429,578 (X)  Less than $300 211 +/-165 0.0% +/-0.1  $300 to $499 2,164 +/-656 0.5% +/-0.2  $500 to $699 5,952 +/-960 1.4% +/-0.2  $700 to $999 16,925 +/-1,822 3.9% +/-0.4  $1,000 to $1,499 60,248 +/-3,790 14.0% +/-0.9  $1,500 to $1,999 84,619 +/-3,926 19.7% +/-0.9  $2,000 or more 259,459 +/-7,247 60.4% +/-1.2  Median (dollars) 2,282 +/-30 (X) (X)

    Housing units without a mortgage 143,952 +/-4,180 143,952 (X)  Less than $100 3,837 +/-848 2.7% +/-0.6  $100 to $199 9,258 +/-1,350 6.4% +/-1.0  $200 to $299 19,693 +/-1,805 13.7% +/-1.2  $300 to $399 21,306 +/-1,989 14.8% +/-1.4  $400 or more 89,858 +/-4,335 62.4% +/-2.1  Median (dollars) 486 +/-13 (X) (X)

SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS APERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (SMOCAPI)    Housing units with a mortgage (excluding units whereSMOCAPI cannot be computed)

418,807 +/-7,127 418,807 (X)

  Less than 20.0 percent 101,782 +/-4,277 24.3% +/-0.9  20.0 to 24.9 percent 64,844 +/-3,820 15.5% +/-0.9  25.0 to 29.9 percent 51,895 +/-3,303 12.4% +/-0.8  30.0 to 34.9 percent 45,599 +/-3,537 10.9% +/-0.8  35.0 percent or more 154,687 +/-5,755 36.9% +/-1.2

  Not computed 10,771 +/-2,223 (X) (X)

    Housing unit without a mortgage (excluding unitswhere SMOCAPI cannot be computed)

142,239 +/-4,265 142,239 (X)

  Less than 10.0 percent 64,140 +/-2,937 45.1% +/-1.8  10.0 to 14.9 percent 25,409 +/-2,203 17.9% +/-1.4  15.0 to 19.9 percent 13,734 +/-1,461 9.7% +/-1.0

3 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 18: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

  20.0 to 24.9 percent 9,310 +/-1,296 6.5% +/-0.9  25.0 to 29.9 percent 7,112 +/-1,224 5.0% +/-0.8  30.0 to 34.9 percent 4,305 +/-950 3.0% +/-0.6  35.0 percent or more 18,229 +/-1,815 12.8% +/-1.2

  Not computed 1,713 +/-565 (X) (X)

GROSS RENT

    Occupied units paying rent 493,339 +/-7,247 493,339 (X)  Less than $200 2,812 +/-786 0.6% +/-0.2  $200 to $299 7,705 +/-1,357 1.6% +/-0.3  $300 to $499 12,370 +/-1,378 2.5% +/-0.3  $500 to $749 26,354 +/-2,438 5.3% +/-0.5  $750 to $999 92,003 +/-4,641 18.6% +/-0.9  $1,000 to $1,499 181,228 +/-5,735 36.7% +/-1.1  $1,500 or more 170,867 +/-5,347 34.6% +/-0.9  Median (dollars) 1,253 +/-14 (X) (X)

  No rent paid 12,784 +/-1,456 (X) (X)

GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDINCOME (GRAPI)    Occupied units paying rent (excluding units whereGRAPI cannot be computed)

476,530 +/-7,370 476,530 (X)

  Less than 15.0 percent 39,051 +/-3,325 8.2% +/-0.7  15.0 to 19.9 percent 46,346 +/-3,841 9.7% +/-0.8  20.0 to 24.9 percent 56,872 +/-3,954 11.9% +/-0.8  25.0 to 29.9 percent 58,115 +/-4,061 12.2% +/-0.8  30.0 to 34.9 percent 47,130 +/-3,573 9.9% +/-0.7  35.0 percent or more 229,016 +/-6,741 48.1% +/-1.3

  Not computed 29,593 +/-2,511 (X) (X)

Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability isrepresented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpretedroughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin oferror (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject tononsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in thesetables.

The median gross rent excludes no cash renters.

In prior years, the universe included all owner-occupied units with a mortgage. It is now restricted to include only those units where SMOCAPI iscomputed, that is, SMOC and household income are valid values.

In prior years, the universe included all owner-occupied units without a mortgage. It is now restricted to include only those units where SMOCAPI iscomputed, that is, SMOC and household income are valid values.

In prior years, the universe included all renter-occupied units. It is now restricted to include only those units where GRAPI is computed, that is, grossrent and household Income are valid values.

The 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 plumbing data for Puerto Rico will not be shown. Research indicates that the questions on plumbing facilities thatwere introduced in 2008 in the stateside American Community Survey and the 2008 Puerto Rico Community Survey may not have been appropriatefor Puerto Rico.

Median calculations for base table sourcing VAL, MHC, SMOC, and TAX should exclude zero values.

Telephone service data are not available for certain geographic areas due to problems with data collection. See Errata Note #93 for details.

4 of 5 02/18/2014

Page 19: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

While the 2012 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions ofmetropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables maydiffer from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.

Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data.Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarilyreflect the results of ongoing urbanization.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 American Community Survey

Explanation of Symbols:

1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available tocompute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate. 2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute anestimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of anopen-ended distribution. 3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution. 4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. Astatistical test is not appropriate. 6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. 7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number ofsample cases is too small. 8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available.

Page 20: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

DP05 ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES

2012 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Surveywebsite in the Data and Documentation section.

Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American CommunitySurvey website in the Methodology section.

Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, it is the Census Bureau's PopulationEstimates Program that produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns andestimates of housing units for states and counties.

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

SEX AND AGE

    Total population 3,177,063 ***** 3,177,063 (X)  Male 1,596,686 +/-373 50.3% +/-0.1  Female 1,580,377 +/-373 49.7% +/-0.1

  Under 5 years 208,721 ***** 6.6% *****  5 to 9 years 199,032 +/-5,829 6.3% +/-0.2  10 to 14 years 194,753 +/-5,829 6.1% +/-0.2  15 to 19 years 217,981 +/-728 6.9% +/-0.1  20 to 24 years 276,781 +/-728 8.7% +/-0.1  25 to 34 years 495,765 +/-488 15.6% +/-0.1  35 to 44 years 423,229 +/-703 13.3% +/-0.1  45 to 54 years 427,163 +/-542 13.4% +/-0.1  55 to 59 years 196,687 +/-5,035 6.2% +/-0.2  60 to 64 years 157,115 +/-5,068 4.9% +/-0.2  65 to 74 years 203,673 +/-442 6.4% +/-0.1  75 to 84 years 116,360 +/-2,889 3.7% +/-0.1  85 years and over 59,803 +/-2,876 1.9% +/-0.1

  Median age (years) 34.9 +/-0.1 (X) (X)

  18 years and over 2,450,793 ***** 77.1% *****  21 years and over 2,297,698 +/-4,775 72.3% +/-0.2  62 years and over 472,083 +/-4,819 14.9% +/-0.2  65 years and over 379,836 +/-427 12.0% +/-0.1

    18 years and over 2,450,793 ***** 2,450,793 (X)  Male 1,224,644 ***** 50.0% *****  Female 1,226,149 ***** 50.0% *****

    65 years and over 379,836 +/-427 379,836 (X)  Male 166,426 +/-417 43.8% +/-0.1  Female 213,410 +/-307 56.2% +/-0.1

RACE

    Total population 3,177,063 ***** 3,177,063 (X)

1 of 3 02/18/2014

Page 21: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

  One race 3,032,362 +/-10,598 95.4% +/-0.3  Two or more races 144,701 +/-10,598 4.6% +/-0.3

  One race 3,032,362 +/-10,598 95.4% +/-0.3    White 2,237,694 +/-16,144 70.4% +/-0.5    Black or African American 163,368 +/-3,877 5.1% +/-0.1    American Indian and Alaska Native 26,541 +/-4,238 0.8% +/-0.1      Cherokee tribal grouping 993 +/-524 0.0% +/-0.1      Chippewa tribal grouping 0 +/-197 0.0% +/-0.1      Navajo tribal grouping 409 +/-243 0.0% +/-0.1      Sioux tribal grouping 455 +/-279 0.0% +/-0.1    Asian 364,545 +/-6,362 11.5% +/-0.2      Asian Indian 31,702 +/-5,996 1.0% +/-0.2      Chinese 53,141 +/-5,664 1.7% +/-0.2      Filipino 152,815 +/-10,460 4.8% +/-0.3      Japanese 21,543 +/-3,242 0.7% +/-0.1      Korean 20,018 +/-3,979 0.6% +/-0.1      Vietnamese 51,570 +/-6,166 1.6% +/-0.2      Other Asian 33,756 +/-5,463 1.1% +/-0.2    Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 15,737 +/-1,146 0.5% +/-0.1      Native Hawaiian 3,458 +/-1,602 0.1% +/-0.1      Guamanian or Chamorro 5,387 +/-1,645 0.2% +/-0.1      Samoan 3,042 +/-1,459 0.1% +/-0.1      Other Pacific Islander 3,850 +/-1,802 0.1% +/-0.1    Some other race 224,477 +/-14,245 7.1% +/-0.4  Two or more races 144,701 +/-10,598 4.6% +/-0.3    White and Black or African American 17,770 +/-3,010 0.6% +/-0.1    White and American Indian and Alaska Native 20,504 +/-3,191 0.6% +/-0.1    White and Asian 48,229 +/-5,060 1.5% +/-0.2    Black or African American and American Indian andAlaska Native

2,942 +/-1,166 0.1% +/-0.1

  Race alone or in combination with one or more otherraces    Total population 3,177,063 ***** 3,177,063 (X)  White 2,356,832 +/-16,419 74.2% +/-0.5  Black or African American 203,773 +/-4,840 6.4% +/-0.2  American Indian and Alaska Native 59,202 +/-6,183 1.9% +/-0.2  Asian 431,896 +/-3,776 13.6% +/-0.1  Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 28,127 +/-3,494 0.9% +/-0.1  Some other race 256,156 +/-14,266 8.1% +/-0.4

HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE

    Total population 3,177,063 ***** 3,177,063 (X)  Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 1,037,685 ***** 32.7% *****    Mexican 924,416 +/-9,641 29.1% +/-0.3    Puerto Rican 23,925 +/-3,202 0.8% +/-0.1    Cuban 5,924 +/-1,771 0.2% +/-0.1    Other Hispanic or Latino 83,420 +/-8,474 2.6% +/-0.3  Not Hispanic or Latino 2,139,378 ***** 67.3% *****    White alone 1,509,733 +/-1,263 47.5% +/-0.1    Black or African American alone 153,435 +/-3,195 4.8% +/-0.1    American Indian and Alaska Native alone 12,433 +/-1,735 0.4% +/-0.1    Asian alone 356,437 +/-6,149 11.2% +/-0.2    Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 15,207 +/-1,126 0.5% +/-0.1    Some other race alone 3,063 +/-1,145 0.1% +/-0.1    Two or more races 89,070 +/-6,825 2.8% +/-0.2      Two races including Some other race 4,740 +/-1,686 0.1% +/-0.1      Two races excluding Some other race, and Three ormore races

84,330 +/-6,237 2.7% +/-0.2

2 of 3 02/18/2014

Page 22: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

Subject San Diego County, California

Estimate Margin of Error Percent Percent Margin ofError

    Total housing units 1,169,225 +/-1,389 (X) (X)

Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability isrepresented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpretedroughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin oferror (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject tononsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in thesetables.

The ACS questions on Hispanic origin and race were revised in 2008 to make them consistent with the Census 2010 question wording. Any changesin estimates for 2008 and beyond may be due to demographic changes, as well as factors including questionnaire changes, differences in ACSpopulation controls, and methodological differences in the population estimates, and therefore should be used with caution. For a summary ofquestionnaire changes see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/questionnaire_changes/. For more information about changes in theestimates see http://www.census.gov/population/hispanic/files/acs08researchnote.pdf.

For more information on understanding race and Hispanic origin data, please see the Census 2010 Brief entitled, Overview of Race and HispanicOrigin: 2010, issued March 2011. (pdf format)

While the 2012 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions ofmetropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables maydiffer from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.

Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data.Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarilyreflect the results of ongoing urbanization.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 American Community Survey

Explanation of Symbols:

1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available tocompute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate. 2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute anestimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of anopen-ended distribution. 3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution. 4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. 5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. Astatistical test is not appropriate. 6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. 7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number ofsample cases is too small. 8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available.

3 of 3 02/18/2014

Page 23: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

 

  

 

 

Selected Census Data Concepts for Grant Writers 

SOCIAL:

What is a Household? A household includes all the people who occupy a housing unit as their usual place of residence. Two kinds of households:

• Family Households – A family consists of a householder and one or more other people living in the same household who are related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. All people in a household who are related to the householder are regarded as members of his or her family.

• Nonfamily Household -- A householder living alone or with nonrelatives only. Same-sex couple households with no relatives of the householder present are tabulated in nonfamily households.

http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/SubjectDefinitions/2011_ACSSubjectDefinitions.pdf

http://factfinder2.census.gov/help/en/american_factfinder_help.htm#glossary/glossary.htm

How does the Census Bureau classify Race and Hispanic Origin?

• Race: Starting in 1997, OMB required federal agencies to use a minimum of five race categories: White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. For respondents unable to identify with any of these five race categories, OMB approved the Census Bureau’s inclusion of a sixth category—Some Other Race.

• Origin: is viewed as the heritage, nationality group, lineage, or country of birth of the person or the person's parents or ancestors before their arrival in the United States.

• Ethnicity: OMB requires federal agencies to use a minimum of two ethnicities: Hispanic or Latino and Not Hispanic or Latino.

• Hispanics or Latino: “Hispanic or Latino” refers to a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin regardless of race. People who identify their origin as Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino may be of any race. Thus, the percent Hispanic should not be added to percentages for racial categories.

• Non-Hispanic White alone persons: are individuals who responded "No, not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino" and who reported "White" as their only entry in the race question. Tallies that show race categories for Hispanics and non-Hispanics separately are also available.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_1997standards; http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf

Page 24: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

 

02‐19‐13  

ECONOMIC: What is the difference between Household and Family Income? Household Income– This includes the income of the householder and all other individuals 15 years old and over in the household, whether they are related to the householder or not. Because many households consist of only one person, average household income is usually less than average family income.

Family Income – In compiling statistics on family income, the incomes of all members 15 years old and over related to the householder are summed and treated as a single amount.

How does the Census Bureau define Poverty? Poverty-Following the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB’s) Directive 14, the Census Bureau uses a set of money income thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is in poverty. If the total income for a family or unrelated individual falls below the relevant poverty threshold, then the family (and every individual in it) or unrelated individual is considered in poverty.

Poverty Threshold: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/threshld/index.html

http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/SubjectDefinitions/2011_ACSSubjectDefinitions.pdf

http://factfinder2.census.gov/help/en/american_factfinder_help.htm#glossary/glossary.htm

Page 25: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

 

  

AMERI

Since the tables and

An ACS d

1. An initia

• Afo

• Athcoanin

*Not

2. The ne

01 = Age 02 = Race03 = Hisp04 = Ance05 = Fore06 = Plac07 = Resi08 = Jour09 = Child10 = Gran11 = Hous12 = Marit13 = Ferti14 = Scho15 = Educ16 = Lang17 = Pove18 = Disa19 = Incom20 = Earn21 = Vete22 = Food23 = Emp24 = Indu25 = Hous26 = Grou27 = Heal98 = Qual99 = Impu

ICAN COM

release of thd maps, use t

detailed table

al character w

A “B” is used foor all geograpA "C" is used fhe same numollapsed to a nd "85 years

n a "C" table. e: Not every "

xt two charac

and Sex e anic or Latinoestry eign Born; Citie of Birth dence 1 Yearney to Work; dren; Househndparents; Grsehold Type; tal Status andlity ool Enrollmencational Attainguage Spokenerty bility me (Househo

nings (Individueran Status d Stamps ployment Statustry; Occupatsing Characteup Quarters lth Insurance lity Measuresutation table f

MUNITY S

e 2005 Amerthe same num

number cons

which is eithe

or base tablehies.

for a collapsedber (e.g., C07single line in and over" fro

"B" table has

cters identify t

o Origin

izenship; Yea

r Ago; MigratiWorkers' Chaold Relations

randchildren Family Type;

d History

nt nment n at Home an

olds and Famuals)

us; Work Exption; Class of eristics

s or any subjec

SURVEY TA

rican Communmbering schem

sists of up to f

r “B” or “C.” 

s. These tabl

d version of a7001 and B07the "C" tablem a "B" table

a collapsed v

the subject of

ar or Entry; Na

ion aracteristics;

ship

; Subfamilies

nd Ability to S

ilies)

perience; LaboWorker

ct

ABLE NUM

nity Survey (Ame.

five elements

es provide th

a "B" table. A 7001), but two. For example

e may be colla

version.

f the table.

ativity

Commuting

peak English

or Force

BERS AND

ACS) data, de

s:

e most detail

"C" table is vo or more linee, the lines "7apsed to a sin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B = Base17 = Pov001 = Se

D WHAT TH

etailed tables

ed estimates

very similar toes from the "B75 to 79 yearsngle line of "7

 

e (version of tverty (subjecteries (unique 

Page 26: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)
Page 27: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. Department of CommerceEconomics and Statistics Administration

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU

Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 20102010 Census Briefs

By Karen R. Humes,Nicholas A. Jones, andRoberto R. Ramirez

C2010BR-02

Issued March 2011

INTRODUCTION

This report looks at our nation’s chang-ing racial and ethnic diversity. It is part of a series that analyzes population and housing data collected from the 2010 Census, and it provides a snap-shot of race and Hispanic origin in the United States. Racial and ethnic popula-tion group distributions and growth at the national level and at lower levels of geography are presented.

This report also provides an overview of race and ethnicity concepts and defi-nitions used in the 2010 Census. The data for this report are based on the 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, which is among the first 2010 Census data products to be released and is pro-vided to each state for use in drawing boundaries for legislative districts.1

1 The 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File provides data on Hispanicorigin and race, including information on the popula-tion reporting more than one race as well as detailed race combinations (e.g., White and Asian; White and Black or African American and American Indian and Alaska Native). In this report, the multiple-race combi-nation categories are denoted with the conjunction and in bold and italicized print to indicate the specific race groups that comprise the particular combination. This report discusses data for the 50 states and the District of Columbia but not Puerto Rico.

The 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File does not contain data for detailed Hispanic origin groups (e.g., Mexican or Puerto Rican) or detailed information about race or tribes (e.g., Chinese, Samoan, or Choctaw). Therefore, these specific groups are not discussed in this report. Data on detailed Hispanic origin groups and detailed information about race and tribes will be released on a state-by-state basis as part of the 2010 Census Demographic Profile and the 2010 Census Summary File 1. Additional reports on the Hispanic or Latino population and selected race popula-tion groups will be released as part of the 2010 Census Briefs series. For a detailed schedule of 2010 Census products and release dates, visit <www.census.gov /population/www/cen2010/glance/index.html>.

UNDERSTANDING RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN DATA FROM THE 2010 CENSUS

The 2010 Census used established federal standards to collect and present data on race and Hispanic origin.

For the 2010 Census, the questions on race and Hispanic origin were asked of individuals living in the United States (see Figure 1). An individual’s responses to the race question and to the Hispanic origin question were based upon

Figure 1.Reproduction of the Questions on Hispanic Origin and Race From the 2010 Census

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census questionnaire.

Page 28: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

2 U.S. Census Bureau

self-identification. The U.S. Census Bureau collects race and Hispanic origin information following the guidance of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) 1997 Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity.2 These federal standards mandate that race and Hispanic origin (ethnicity) are separate and distinct concepts and that when collecting these data via self-identification, two different questions must be used.

Hispanic Origin

The OMB definition of Hispanic or Latino origin used in the 2010 Census is presented in the text box “Definition of Hispanic or Latino Origin Used in the 2010 Census.” OMB requires fed-eral agencies to use a minimum of two ethnicities: Hispanic or Latino and Not Hispanic or Latino. Hispanic origin can be viewed as the heritage, nationality group, lineage, or country of birth of the person or the person’s parents or ancestors before their arrival in the United States. People who identify their origin as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish may be any race.3

Definition of Hispanic or Latino Origin Used in the 2010 Census

“Hispanic or Latino” refers to a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin regardless of race.

2 The 1997 Revisions to the Standardsfor the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity, issued by OMB, isavailable at <www.whitehouse.gov/omb /fedreg/1997standards.html>.

3 The terms “Hispanic or Latino” and“Hispanic” are used interchangeably in this report.

The 2010 Census question on Hispanic origin included five separate response categories and one area where respondents could write-in a specific Hispanic origin group. The first response cat-egory is intended for respondents who do not identify as Hispanic. The remaining response catego-ries (“Mexican, Mexican Am., or Chicano”; “Puerto Rican”; “Cuban”; and “Another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin”) and write-in answers can be combined to create the OMB category of Hispanic.4

Race

The OMB definitions of the race cat-egories used in the 2010 Census, plus the Census Bureau’s definition of Some Other Race, are presented in the text box “Definition of Race Categories Used in the 2010 Census.” Starting in 1997, OMB required federal agencies to use a minimum of five race categories: White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. For respon-dents unable to identify with any of these five race categories, OMB approved the Census Bureau’s inclusion of a sixth category—Some Other Race—on the Census 2000 and 2010 Census questionnaires.

4 There were three changes to theHispanic origin question for the 2010 Census.First, the wording of the question changed from “Is this person Spanish/Hispanic/Latino?” in 2000 to “Is this person of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin?” in 2010. Second, in 2000, the question provided an instruc-tion, “Mark the ‘No’ box if not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino.” The 2010 Census question provided no specific instruction for non- Hispanic respondents. Third, in 2010, the “Yes, another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin” category provided examples of six Hispanic origin groups (Argentinean, Colombian, Dominican, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, and so on) and instructed respondents to “print origin.” In 2000, no Hispanic origin examples were given.

Data on race have been collected since the first U.S. decennial census in 1790.5 For the first time in Census 2000, individuals were presented with the option to self-identify with more than one race and this continued with the 2010 Census, as prescribed by OMB. There are 57 possible multiple race combinations involving the five OMB race categories and Some Other Race.

The 2010 Census question on race included 15 separate response categories and three areas where respondents could write-in detailed information about their race.6 The response categories and write-in answers can be combined to create the five minimum OMB race cat-egories plus Some Other Race. In addition to White, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaska Native, and Some Other Race, 7 of the 15 response catego-ries are Asian groups and 4 are Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups. 7

5 For information about comparability of 2010 Census data on race and Hispanic origin to data collected in previous censuses, see the 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File—Technical Documentation at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf>.

6 There were two changes to the question on race for the 2010 Census. First, the word-ing of the race question was changed from “What is this person’s race? Mark one or more races to indicate what this person con-siders himself/herself to be” in 2000 to “What is this person’s race? Mark one or more boxes” for 2010. Second, in 2010, examples were added to the “Other Asian” response category (Hmong, Laotian, Thai, Pakistani, Cambodian, and so on) and the “Other Pacific Islander” response category (Fijian, Tongan, and so on). In 2000, no examples were given in the race question.

7 The race categories included in the census questionnaire generally reflect a social definition of race recognized in this country and are not an attempt to define race biologi-cally, anthropologically, or genetically. In addi-tion, it is recognized that the categories of the race question include race and national origin or sociocultural groups.

Page 29: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. Census Bureau 3

Definition of Race Categories Used in the 2010 Census

“White” refers to a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who indi-cated their race(s) as “White” or reported entries such as Irish, German, Italian, Lebanese, Arab, Moroccan, or Caucasian.

“Black or African American” refers to a person having origins in any of the Black racial groups of Africa. It includes people who indicated their race(s) as “Black, African Am., or Negro” or reported entries such as African American, Kenyan, Nigerian, or Haitian.

“American Indian or Alaska Native” refers to a person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America) and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment. This category includes people who indicated their race(s) as “American Indian or Alaska Native” or reported their enrolled or prin-cipal tribe, such as Navajo, Blackfeet, Inupiat, Yup’ik, or Central American Indian groups or South American Indian groups.

“Asian” refers to a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent, including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam. It includes people who indicated their race(s) as “Asian” or reported entries such as “Asian Indian,” “Chinese,” “Filipino,” “Korean,” “Japanese,” “Vietnamese,” and “Other Asian” or provided other detailed Asian responses.

“Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander” refers to a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands. It includes people who indicated their race(s) as “Pacific Islander” or reported entries such as “Native Hawaiian,” “Guamanian or Chamorro,” “Samoan,” and “Other Pacific Islander” or provided other detailed Pacific Islander responses.

“Some Other Race” includes all other responses not included in the White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander race categories described above. Respondents reporting entries such as multiracial, mixed, interracial, or a Hispanic or Latino group (for example, Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, or Spanish) in response to the race question are included in this category.

RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN IN THE 2010 CENSUS

Data from the 2010 Census provide insights to our racially and ethni-cally diverse nation. According to the 2010 Census, 308.7 million

people resided in the United States on April 1, 2010—an increase of 27.3 million people, or 9.7 percent, between 2000 and 2010. The vast majority of the growth in the total population came from increases in those who reported their race(s) as

something other than White alone and those who reported their eth-

nicity as Hispanic or Latino.8

More than half of the growth in the total population of the United States between 2000 and 2010 was due to the increase in the Hispanic population.

In 2010, there were 50.5 million Hispanics in the United States, composing 16 percent of the total population (see Table 1). Between 2000 and 2010, the Hispanic popu-lation grew by 43 percent—rising from 35.3 million in 2000, when this group made up 13 percent of the total population.9 The Hispanic population increased by 15.2 million between 2000 and 2010, accounting for over half of the 27.3 million increase in the total popula-tion of the United States.

The non-Hispanic population grew relatively slower over the decade, about 5 percent. Within the non-Hispanic population, the number of people who reported their race as White alone grew even slower between 2000 and 2010 (1 per-cent). While the non-Hispanic White alone population increased numeri-cally from 194.6 million to 196.8 million over the 10-year period, its proportion of the total population declined from 69 percent to 64 percent.

8 For the purposes of this report, the term “reported” is used to refer to the response provided by respondents as well as responses assigned during the editing and imputation process.

9 The observed changes in race and Hispanic origin counts between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census could be attributed to a number of factors. Demographic change since 2000, which includes births and deaths in a geographic area and migration in and out of a geographic area, will have an impact on the resulting 2010 Census counts. Additionally, some changes in the race and Hispanic origin questions’ wording and format since Census 2000 could have influenced reporting patterns in the 2010 Census.

Page 30: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

4 U.S. Census Bureau

Table 1.Population by Hispanic or Latino Origin and by Race for the United States: 2000 and 2010(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Change, 2000 2010

2000 to 2010Hispanic or Latino origin and race Percentage Percentage

of total of total Number population Number population Number Percent

HISPANIC OR LATINO ORIGIN AND RACE

Total population � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 281,421,906 100�0 308,745,538 100�0 27,323,632 9�7Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 35,305,818 12�5 50,477,594 16�3 15,171,776 43�0Not Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 246,116,088 87�5 258,267,944 83�7 12,151,856 4�9 White alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 194,552,774 69�1 196,817,552 63�7 2,264,778 1�2

RACE

Total population � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 281,421,906 100�0 308,745,538 100�0 27,323,632 9�7One Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 274,595,678 97�6 299,736,465 97�1 25,140,787 9�2 White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 211,460,626 75�1 223,553,265 72�4 12,092,639 5�7 Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 34,658,190 12�3 38,929,319 12�6 4,271,129 12�3 American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � 2,475,956 0�9 2,932,248 0�9 456,292 18�4 Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 10,242,998 3�6 14,674,252 4�8 4,431,254 43�3 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � 398,835 0�1 540,013 0�2 141,178 35�4 Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 15,359,073 5�5 19,107,368 6�2 3,748,295 24�4Two or More Races1 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 6,826,228 2�4 9,009,073 2�9 2,182,845 32�0

1 In Census 2000, an error in data processing resulted in an overstatement of the Two or More Races population by about 1 million people (about 15 percent) nationally, which almost entirely affected race combinations involving Some Other Race� Therefore, data users should assess observed changes in the Two or More Races population and race combinations involving Some Other Race between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census with caution� Changes in specific race combinations not involving Some Other Race, such as White and Black or African American or White and Asian, generally should be more comparable�

Sources: U�S� Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables PL1 and PL2; and 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables P1 and P2�

The overwhelming majority of the total population of the United States reported only one race in 2010.

In the 2010 Census, 97 percent of all respondents (299.7 million) reported only one race (see Table 1).10 The largest group reported

10 Individuals who responded to the ques-tion on race by indicating only one race are referred to as the race-alone population or the group that reported only one race category. Six categories make up this population: White alone, Black or African American alone, American Indian and Alaska Native alone, Asian alone, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, and Some Other Race alone. Individuals who chose more than 1 of the 6 race categories are referred to as the Two or More Races population. All respondents who indicated more than one race can be collapsed into the Two or More Races category which, combined with the six race-alone categories, yields seven mutually exclusive and exhaus-tive categories. Thus, the six race-alone cat-egories and the Two or More Races category sum to the total population.

White alone (223.6 million), accounting for 72 percent of all people living in the United States.11 The Black or African-American alone population was 38.9 million and represented 13 percent of the total population.12 There were 2.9 million respondents who indicated American Indian and Alaska Native alone (0.9 percent). Approximately 14.7 million (about 5 percent of all respondents) identified their race

11 As a matter of policy, the Census Bureau does not advocate the use of the alone population over the alone-or-in-combination population or vice versa. The use of the alone population in sections of this report does not imply that it is a preferred method of pre-senting or analyzing data. The same is true for sections of this report that focus on the alone-or-in-combination population. Data on race from the 2010 Census can be presented and discussed in a variety of ways.

12 The terms “Black or African American” and “Black” are used interchangeably in this report.

as Asian alone. The smallest major race group was Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone (0.5 million) and represented 0.2 percent of the total population.

The remainder of respondents who reported only one race—19.1 mil-lion (6 percent of all respondents)—were classified as Some Other Race alone. People who reported more than one race numbered 9.0 mil-lion in the 2010 Census and made up about 3 percent of the total population.

The Asian population grew faster than any other major race group between 2000 and 2010.

In the United States, all major race groups increased in population size between 2000 and 2010, but they

Page 31: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. Census Bureau 5

grew at different rates. Over the decade, the Asian alone popula-tion experienced the fastest rate of growth and the White alone popula-tion experienced the slowest rate of growth, with the other major race groups’ growth spanning the range in between. Of the 27.3 million people added to the total population of the United States between 2000 and 2010, the White alone population made up just under half of the growth—increas-ing 12.1 million. Within the White alone population, the vast majority of the growth was propelled by the Hispanic population.

The Asian alone population increased by 43 percent between 2000 and 2010, more than any other major race group. The Asian alone population had the second-largest numeric change (4.4 mil-lion), growing from 10.2 million in 2000 to 14.7 million in 2010. The Asian alone population gained the most in share of the total popu-lation, moving up from about 4 percent in 2000 to about 5 percent in 2010.

The Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone population, the smallest major race group, also grew substantially between 2000 and 2010, increasing by more than one-third. This population num-bered 398,835 in 2000, rising to 540,013 in 2010 with its propor-tion of the total population chang-ing from 0.1 percent to 0.2 percent, respectively.

Between 2000 and 2010, the population classified as Some Other Race alone increased considerably,

growing by about one-quarter. This population climbed from 15.4 mil-lion in 2000 to 19.1 million in 2010 and was approximately 6 percent of the total population in both decennial censuses. Most of this growth was due to increases in the Hispanic population.

An 18 percent growth in the American Indian and Alaska Native alone population occurred between 2000 and 2010. This population, also relatively small numerically, maintained its proportion of the total population between decennial censuses (0.9 percent) while grow-ing from 2.5 million to 2.9 million.

While the Black alone popula-tion had the third-largest numeric increase in population size over the decade (4.3 million), behind the White alone and Asian alone popu-lations, it grew slower than most other major race groups. In fact, the Black alone population exhib-ited the smallest percentage growth outside of the White alone popula-tion, increasing 12 percent between 2000 and 2010. This population rose from 34.7 million in 2000 to 38.9 million in 2010, making up 12 percent and 13 percent of the total population, respectively.

The only major race group to experience a decrease in its propor-tion of the total population was the White alone population. While this group increased the most numeri-cally between decennial censuses (211.5 million to 223.6 million), its share of the total population fell from 75 percent in 2000 to 72 percent in 2010.

The Two or More Races population was one of the fastest-growing groups over the decade. This popu-lation increased approximately one-third between 2000 and 2010.13

The Hispanic population predominantly identified as either White or Some Other Race.

People of Hispanic origin may be any race. For the 2010 Census, a new instruction was added imme-diately preceding the questions on Hispanic origin and race, which was not used in Census 2000. The instruction stated that “For this census, Hispanic origins are not races” because in the federal statistical system, Hispanic origin is considered to be a separate con-cept from race. However, this did not preclude individuals from self-identifying their race as “Latino,” “Mexican,” “Puerto Rican,” “Salvadoran,” or other national origins or ethnicities; in fact, many did so. If the response provided to the race question could not be classified in one or more of the five OMB race groups, it was generally classified in the category Some Other Race. Therefore, responses to the question on race that reflect a Hispanic origin were classified in the Some Other Race category.

13 In Census 2000, an error in data pro-cessing resulted in an overstatement of the Two or More Races population by about 1 million people (about 15 percent) nationally, which almost entirely affected race combina-tions involving Some Other Race. Therefore, data users should assess observed changes in the Two or More Races population and race combinations involving Some Other Race between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census with caution. Changes in specific multiple-race combinations not involving Some Other Race, such as White and Black or White and Asian, generally, should be more comparable.

Page 32: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

6 U.S. Census Bureau

The 2010 Census racial distribu-tions of the Hispanic population and of the non-Hispanic population differ and are shown in Table 2. Over half of the Hispanic popula-tion identified as White and no other race, while about one-third provided responses that were clas-sified as Some Other Race alone when responding to the question on race. Much smaller proportions of Hispanics identified as other race groups alone: Black alone (3 per-cent), American Indian and Alaska Native alone (1 percent), Asian alone (0.4 percent), and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone (0.1 percent).

The racial distribution of the non-Hispanic population, on the other hand, was mostly White alone (76 percent), Black alone (15 percent), and Asian alone (6 percent). Less than 1 percent of non-Hispanics provided responses to the race question that were classified as Some Other Race alone (0.2 percent).

In 2010, 6 percent of Hispanics reported multiple races. Among non-Hispanics, 2 percent reported more than one race.

Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders and American Indians and Alaska Natives were more likely than other groups to report multiple races.

In the 2010 Census, the popula-tion reporting their race as White, either alone or with at least one other race, was the largest of all the alone-or-in-combination catego-ries (231.0 million) and represented about three-fourths of the total

population (see Table 3).14 People who reported their race as White in combination with one or more addi-tional races numbered 7.5 million, making up 2 percent of the total population. About 14 percent of

14 The maximum number of people reporting a particular race is reflected in the race-alone-or-in-combination concept. This represents the number of times responses were part of 1 of the 6 major race categories, either alone or in combination with the other five race categories. There are six race-alone-or-in-combination categories, which are not mutually exclusive: White alone or in combination, Black alone or in combination, American Indian and Alaska Native alone or in combination, Asian alone or in combination, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone or in combination, and Some Other Race alone or in combination. For example, a respondent who indicated Asian and White was counted in the Asian alone-or-in-combination category as well as in the White alone-or-in-combination category. Therefore, the sum of all race-alone-or-in-combination categories equals the number of races reported (i.e., responses), which exceeds the total population.

the total population reported their race as Black, either alone or with at least one other race, which was the second-largest of the alone-or-in-combination categories (42.0 million).

There were 21.7 million people classified as Some Other Race alone or in combination and 17.3 million people classified as Asian alone or in combination in the 2010 Census, making up 7 percent and 6 percent of the total popula-tion, respectively. There were com-parable levels and proportions of the total population who indicated race groups in combination with Some Other Race (2.6 million and 0.9 percent) and with Asian (2.6 million and 0.9 percent).

Table 2.Population by Hispanic or Latino Origin and Race for the United States: 2010(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Hispanic or Latino origin and race Number Percent

HISPANIC OR LATINO Total � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 50,477,594 100�0

RaceOne Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 47,435,002 94�0 White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 26,735,713 53�0 Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,243,471 2�5 American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 685,150 1�4 Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 209,128 0�4 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � 58,437 0�1 Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 18,503,103 36�7Two or More Races � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3,042,592 6�0

NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO Total � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 258,267,944 100�0

RaceOne Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 252,301,463 97�7 White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 196,817,552 76�2 Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 37,685,848 14�6 American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,247,098 0�9 Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 14,465,124 5�6 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � 481,576 0�2 Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 604,265 0�2Two or More Races � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5,966,481 2�3

Source: U�S� Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables P1 and P2�

Page 33: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. Census Bureau 7

The two smallest alone-or-in- combination categories were American Indian and Alaska Native (5.2 million) and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (1.2 million), making up 2 percent and 0.4 percent of the total population, respectively. These two categories were unique in that large propor-tions of these populations indicated more than one race, compared with other major race groups (see Figure 2). There were more reports of Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander in combination with one or more additional races than there were of Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone (0.7 mil-lion and 0.5 million, respectively). Almost as many people indicated American Indian and Alaska Native in combination with one or more additional races as people who indi-cated American Indian and Alaska Native alone (2.3 million and 2.9 million, respectively). Thus, over half of the Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander population and almost half of the American Indian and Alaska Native population reported more than one race.

Table 3.Race by the Alone-or-In-Combination, Alone, and In-Combination Categories for the United States: 2010(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Percentage Percentage of alone

Race of total or inNumber population combination

Total population � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 308,745,538 100�0 (X)

WHITEAlone or in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 231,040,398 74�8 (X) Alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 223,553,265 72�4 96�8 In combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 7,487,133 2�4 3�2

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICANAlone or in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 42,020,743 13�6 (X) Alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 38,929,319 12�6 92�6 In combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3,091,424 1�0 7�4

AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVEAlone or in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5,220,579 1�7 (X) Alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,932,248 0�9 56�2 In combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,288,331 0�7 43�8

ASIANAlone or in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 17,320,856 5�6 (X) Alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 14,674,252 4�8 84�7 In combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,646,604 0�9 15�3

NATIVE HAWAIIAN AND OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDERAlone or in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,225,195 0�4 (X) Alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 540,013 0�2 44�1 In combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 685,182 0�2 55�9

SOME OTHER RACEAlone or in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 21,748,084 7�0 (X) Alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 19,107,368 6�2 87�9 In combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,640,716 0�9 12�1

(X) Not applicable�

Note: The total population is equal to the number of respondents� In the 2010 Census, there were 308,745,538 respondents� The total of all race categories alone or in combination with one or more other races is equal to the number of responses; therefore, it adds to more than the total population�

Source: U�S� Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table P1�

Page 34: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

8 U.S. Census Bureau

Most people who reported multiple races provided exactly two races in 2010; White and Black was the largest multiple-race combination.

Over the last 10 years, consider-able research has been conducted on people of multiple races, and how they self-identify has become a more common part of our discus-sions and understanding of race and ethnicity. Results from the 2010 Census provide new informa-tion on the diversity and changes in the Two or More Races population in the United States.

Among people who reported more than one race in 2010, the vast majority (about 92 percent) reported exactly two races (see Table 4). An additional 8 percent of the Two or More Races population reported three races and less than 1 percent reported four or more races.

In 2010, four groups were, by far, the largest multiple-race combina-tions in the United States: White and Black (1.8 million), White and Some Other Race (1.7 million), White and Asian (1.6 million), and White and American Indian and Alaska Native (1.4 million). Together, these four combinations composed nearly three-fourths of the multiple-race population in the 2010 Census (see Figure 3).

Different multiple-race reporting patterns occurred for Hispanics and non-Hispanics.

Tables 5 through 10 present data for the major race groups and their largest multiple-race combinations by Hispanic origin. A general pat-tern existed in these data tables for people who reported more than one race in the 2010 Census. There

were more reports of multiple-race combinations that included White than reports of combinations involving any other group. This basic pattern also existed among non-Hispanics. However, among Hispanics, relatively large propor-tions reported multiple-race combi-nations involving Some Other Race, as well as combinations involving White.

Figure 2.Percentage of Major Race Groups Reporting Multiple Races: 2010

Note: Specified race group refers to the alone or in-combination population.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table P1.

Some Other Race

Native Hawaiian and Other

Pacific Islander

AsianAmerican Indian and

Alaska Native

Black or African

American

WhiteTotal population

0 5 10 15 20

Three or more races

NHPI; Some other race

Asian; Some other race

Asian; NHPI

AIAN; Some other race

AIAN; NHPI

AIAN; Asian

Black; Some other race

Black; NHPI

Black; Asian

Black; AIAN

White; Some other race

White; NHPI

White; Black

White: Asian

White; AIAN12.1

55.9

(For more information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

2.9 3.2

7.4

43.8

15.3

Page 35: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. Census Bureau 9

Table 4.Two or More Races Population by Number of Races and Selected Combinations for the United States: 2010(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Race Number Percent

Two or More Races population � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 9,009,073 100�0

Two races � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8,265,318 91�7White; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,834,212 20�4White; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,432,309 15�9White; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,623,234 18�0White; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 169,991 1�9White; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,740,924 19�3Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 269,421 3�0Black or African American; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 185,595 2�1Black or African American; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 50,308 0�6Black or African American; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 314,571 3�5American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 58,829 0�7American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 11,039 0�1American Indian and Alaska Native; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 115,752 1�3Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 165,690 1�8Asian; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 234,462 2�6Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 58,981 0�7

Three races � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 676,469 7�5White; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 230,848 2�6White; Black or African American; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 61,511 0�7White; Black or African American; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 9,245 0�1White; Black or African American; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 46,641 0�5White; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 45,960 0�5White; American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8,656 0�1White; American Indian and Alaska Native; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 30,941 0�3White; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 143,126 1�6White; Asian; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 35,786 0�4White; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 9,181 0�1Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 9,460 0�1Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,142 –Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8,236 0�1Black or African American; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 7,295 0�1Black or African American; Asian; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8,122 0�1Black or African American; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4,233 –American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3,827 –American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3,785 –American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some Other Race � � � � � � 2,000 –Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5,474 0�1

Four races � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 57,875 0�6

Five races � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8,619 0�1

Six races � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 792 –– Percentage rounds to 0�0�

Source: U�S� Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table P1�

Page 36: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

10 U.S. Census Bureau

People who identified as White were the most likely to report only one race.

In the 2010 Census, 97 percent of people in the White alone-or-in-combination category reported White and no other race (see

Table 5). Among the 7.5 million people who reported they were White and one or more additional races, one-fourth reported White and Black, and nearly one-fourth reported White and Some Other Race. Another one-fifth reported

White and Asian, and nearly one-fifth reported White and American Indian and Alaska Native. This was a fairly even distribution of responses among the four largest combinations.

Figure 3.Percentage Distribution of People Who Reported Multiple Races: 2010(For more information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Note: People reporting multiple races represented 2.9 percent of the total population. Black refers to Black or African American; AIAN refers to American Indian and Alaska Native; NHPI refers to Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; SOR refers to Some Other Race.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Table P1.

Three or more races

AIAN; NHPI

Black; NHPI

AIAN; Asian

NHPI; SOR

AIAN; SOR

Asian; NHPI

White; NHPI

Black; Asian

Asian; SOR

Black; AIAN

Black; SOR

White; AIAN

White; Asian

White; SOR

White; Black

0 5 10 15 20

Three or more races

NHPI; Some other race

Asian; Some other race

Asian; NHPI

AIAN; Some other race

AIAN; NHPI

AIAN; Asian

Black; Some other race

Black; NHPI

Black; Asian

Black; AIAN

White; Some other race

White; NHPI

White; Black

White: Asian

White; AIAN

1.3

15.9

18.0

19.3

20.4

0.1

8.3

0.6

0.7

0.7

3.5

3.0

2.6

2.1

1.8

1.9

Page 37: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. Census Bureau 11

Table 5.The White Population and Largest Multiple-Race Combinations by Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States: 2010(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Percentage of White

Race in Number Percent combination

WHITE ALONE OR IN COMBINATION

Total � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 231,040,398 100�0 (X)White alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 223,553,265 96�8 (X)White in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 7,487,133 3�2 100�0 White; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � 1,834,212 0�8 24�5 White; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,740,924 0�8 23�3 White; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,623,234 0�7 21�7 White; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � 1,432,309 0�6 19�1 White; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � 230,848 0�1 3�1 All other combinations including White � � � � � � 625,606 0�3 8�4

Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 29,184,290 100�0 (X)White alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 26,735,713 91�6 (X)White in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,448,577 8�4 100�0 White; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � 245,850 0�8 10�0 White; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,601,125 5�5 65�4 White; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 135,522 0�5 5�5 White; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � 226,385 0�8 9�2 White; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � 50,000 0�2 2�0 All other combinations including White � � � � � � 189,695 0�6 7�7

Not Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 201,856,108 100�0 (X)White alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 196,817,552 97�5 (X)White in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5,038,556 2�5 100�0 White; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � 1,588,362 0�8 31�5 White; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 139,799 0�1 2�8 White; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,487,712 0�7 29�5 White; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � 1,205,924 0�6 23�9 White; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � 180,848 0�1 3�6 All other combinations including White � � � � � � 435,911 0�2 8�7

(X) Not applicable�

Note: Largest combinations based on White in-combination population�

Source: U�S� Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables P1 and P2�

Table 5 shows that 29.2 million people of Hispanic origin reported that they were either White alone or White in combination with another race. Of the 2.4 million Hispanics who reported their race as White in combination with one or more additional races, almost two-thirds were classified as White and Some Other Race.

The multiple-race reporting pat-tern was different for non-Hispanic Whites. Of the 5.0 million non- Hispanics who reported that they were White and one or more additional races, about one-third reported White and Black, nearly one-third reported White and Asian, and about one-fourth reported White and American Indian and Alaska Native.

Page 38: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

12 U.S. Census Bureau

Table 6.The Black or African-American Population and Largest Multiple-Race Combinations by Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States: 2010(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Percentage of Black or

Race African American

Number Percent in combination

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN ALONE OR IN COMBINATION

Total � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 42,020,743 100�0 (X)Black or African American alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 38,929,319 92�6 (X)Black or African American in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3,091,424 7�4 100�0 Black or African American; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,834,212 4�4 59�3 Black or African American; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 314,571 0�7 10�2 Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 269,421 0�6 8�7 Black or African American; White; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 230,848 0�5 7�5 Black or African American; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 185,595 0�4 6�0 All other combinations including Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 256,777 0�6 8�3

Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,897,218 100�0 (X)Black or African American alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,243,471 65�5 (X)Black or African American in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 653,747 34�5 100�0 Black or African American; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 245,850 13�0 37�6 Black or African American; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 227,648 12�0 34�8 Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 31,571 1�7 4�8 Black or African American; White; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 50,000 2�6 7�6 Black or African American; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 15,451 0�8 2�4 All other combinations including Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 83,227 4�4 12�7

Not Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 40,123,525 100�0 (X)Black or African American alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 37,685,848 93�9 (X)Black or African American in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,437,677 6�1 100�0 Black or African American; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,588,362 4�0 65�2 Black or African American; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 86,923 0�2 3�6 Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 237,850 0�6 9�8 Black or African American; White; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 180,848 0�5 7�4 Black or African American; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 170,144 0�4 7�0 All other combinations including Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 173,550 0�4 7�1

(X) Not applicable�

Note: Largest combinations based on Black or African American in-combination population�

Source: U�S� Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables P1 and P2�

Within the population who identified as Black, Hispanics were more likely to report multiple races than non-Hispanics.

In the 2010 Census, 93 percent of people in the Black alone-or-in- combination category reported Black and no other race (see Table 6). Among the 3.1 million people who reported that they were Black and one or more additional races,

the majority reported being Black and White (59 percent).

The Black alone-or-in-combination population included 1.9 million people of Hispanic origin, 35 percent of whom reported multiple races. This is more than five times greater than the proportion report-ing multiple races among non-Hispanics who identified as Black (6 percent). Most Hispanics who

identified as Black in combination with one or more additional races reported one of two combinations: Black and White (38 percent) and Black and Some Other Race (35 percent). This contrasts with non-Hispanics who identified as Black in combination with one or more additional races, where about two-thirds reported one combination, Black and White.

Page 39: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. Census Bureau 13

Table 7.The American Indian and Alaska Native Population and Largest Multiple-Race Combinations by Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States: 2010(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Percentage of American

Race Indian and Alaska Native

Number Percent in combination

AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE ALONE OR IN COMBINATION

Total � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5,220,579 100�0 (X)American Indian and Alaska Native alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,932,248 56�2 (X)American Indian and Alaska Native in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,288,331 43�8 100�0 American Indian and Alaska Native; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,432,309 27�4 62�6 American Indian and Alaska Native; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 269,421 5�2 11�8 American Indian and Alaska Native; White; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 230,848 4�4 10�1 American Indian and Alaska Native; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 115,752 2�2 5�1 American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 58,829 1�1 2�6 All other combinations including American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 181,172 3�5 7�9

Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,190,904 100�0 (X)American Indian and Alaska Native alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 685,150 57�5 (X)American Indian and Alaska Native in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 505,754 42�5 100�0 American Indian and Alaska Native; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 226,385 19�0 44�8 American Indian and Alaska Native; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 31,571 2�7 6�2 American Indian and Alaska Native; White; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 50,000 4�2 9�9 American Indian and Alaska Native; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 106,604 9�0 21�1 American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 12,257 1�0 2�4 All other combinations including American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 78,937 6�6 15�6

Not Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4,029,675 100�0 (X)American Indian and Alaska Native alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,247,098 55�8 (X)American Indian and Alaska Native in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,782,577 44�2 100�0 American Indian and Alaska Native; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,205,924 29�9 67�7 American Indian and Alaska Native; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 237,850 5�9 13�3 American Indian and Alaska Native; White; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 180,848 4�5 10�1 American Indian and Alaska Native; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 9,148 0�2 0�5 American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 46,572 1�2 2�6 All other combinations including American Indian and Alaska Native � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 102,235 2�5 5�7

(X) Not applicable�

Note: Largest combinations based on American Indian and Alaska Native in-combination population�

Source: U�S� Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables P1 and P2�

Nearly half of all people who identified as American Indian and Alaska Native reported multiple races.

In 2010, 56 percent of people in the American Indian and Alaska Native alone-or-in-combination cat-egory reported one race (see Table 7). Of the 2.3 million who reported American Indian and Alaska Native along with one or more additional races, about 63 percent reported one combination: American Indian and Alaska Native and White. American Indian and Alaska Native and Black (12 percent) as well as American Indian and Alaska Native

and White and Black (10 percent) were also common combinations reported among this population.

Among those who identified as American Indian and Alaska Native, the proportion of Hispanics and non-Hispanics who reported more than one race was about the same—unlike any other race group.

There were 1.2 million people of Hispanic origin who identified as American Indian and Alaska Native, 43 percent of whom reported multi-ple races. The majority of Hispanics who reported more than one race within the American Indian and

Alaska Native population identi-fied as one of two combinations: American Indian and Alaska Native and White (45 percent) and American Indian and Alaska Native and Some Other Race (21 per-cent). Similar to Hispanic American Indians and Alaska Natives, 44 per-cent of non-Hispanics who identi-fied as American Indian and Alaska Native reported more than one race. However, unlike Hispanics, over two-thirds reported one combination: American Indian and Alaska Native and White.

Page 40: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

14 U.S. Census Bureau

Among people who identified as Asian, 15 percent reported more than one race.

About 85 percent of the Asian alone-or-in-combination population reported Asian and no other race in the 2010 Census, compared to 15 percent who reported Asian along with one or more additional races (see Table 8). Of the 2.6 million who indicated Asian along with one or more additional races, well over half reported being Asian and White (61 percent).

The majority of the 0.6 million people of Hispanic origin who iden-tified as Asian alone or in combina-tion reported more than one race (65 percent). Among Hispanics who identified as Asian along with one or more additional races, the most frequently reported combinations were Asian and White (35 percent) and Asian and Some Other Race (27 percent). About 14 percent of non-Hispanics who identified as Asian reported multiple races— two-thirds of whom identified as one combination, Asian and White.

Table 8.The Asian Population and Largest Multiple-Race Combinations by Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States: 2010(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Race

Number Percent

Per- centage of Asian

in com-

bination

ASIAN ALONE OR IN COMBINATION

Total � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 17,320,856 100�0 (X)Asian alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 14,674,252 84�7 (X)Asian in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,646,604 15�3 100�0 Asian; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,623,234 9�4 61�3 Asian; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 234,462 1�4 8�9 Asian; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 185,595 1�1 7�0 Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � 165,690 1�0 6�3 Asian; White; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 143,126 0�8 5�4 All other combinations including Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � 294,497 1�7 11�1

Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 598,146 100�0 (X)Asian alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 209,128 35�0 (X)Asian in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 389,018 65�0 100�0 Asian; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 135,522 22�7 34�8 Asian; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 103,591 17�3 26�6 Asian; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 15,451 2�6 4�0 Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � 16,129 2�7 4�1 Asian; White; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 22,799 3�8 5�9 All other combinations including Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � 95,526 16�0 24�6

Not Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 16,722,710 100�0 (X)Asian alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 14,465,124 86�5 (X)Asian in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,257,586 13�5 100�0 Asian; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,487,712 8�9 65�9 Asian; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 130,871 0�8 5�8 Asian; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 170,144 1�0 7�5 Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � 149,561 0�9 6�6 Asian; White; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 120,327 0�7 5�3 All other combinations including Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � 198,971 1�2 8�8

(X) Not applicable�

Note: Largest combinations based on Asian in-combination population�

Source: U�S� Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables P1 and P2�

Page 41: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. Census Bureau 15

Table 9.The Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Population and Largest Multiple-Race Combinations by Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States: 2010(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Race

Number Percent

Percentage of Native

Hawaiian and Other

Pacific Islander in combination

NATIVE HAWAIIAN AND OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER ALONE OR IN COMBINATION

Total � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,225,195 100�0 (X)Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 540,013 44�1 (X)Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 685,182 55�9 100�0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 169,991 13�9 24�8 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 165,690 13�5 24�2 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; White; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 143,126 11�7 20�9 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 58,981 4�8 8�6 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � 50,308 4�1 7�3 All other combinations including Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � 97,086 7�9 14�2

Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 210,307 100�0 (X)Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 58,437 27�8 (X)Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 151,870 72�2 100�0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 22,187 10�5 14�6 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 16,129 7�7 10�6 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; White; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 22,799 10�8 15�0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 46,909 22�3 30�9 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4,913 2�3 3�2 All other combinations including Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � 38,933 18�5 25�6

Not Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,014,888 100�0 (X)Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 481,576 47�5 (X)Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 533,312 52�5 100�0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 147,804 14�6 27�7 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 149,561 14�7 28�0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; White; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 120,327 11�9 22�6 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some Other Race � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 12,072 1�2 2�3 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � � � 45,395 4�5 8�5 All other combinations including Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � 58,153 5�7 10�9

(X) Not applicable�

Note: Largest combinations based on Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander in-combination population�

Source: U�S� Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables P1 and P2�

More than half of all people who identified as Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander reported multiple races.

About 44 percent of people in the Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone-or-in-combination

category reported this race and no other (see Table 9). Of the 0.7 million who indicated Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander along with one or more additional races, 25 percent reported Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander and White, 24 percent reported

Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander and Asian, and 21 percent reported Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander and White and Asian—representing a fairly even distribution of responses among the largest combinations.

Page 42: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

16 U.S. Census Bureau

Within the population who identi-fied as Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, high proportions of both Hispanics (72 percent) and non-Hispanics (53 percent) reported multiple races (0.2 million and 1.0 million, respectively). For Hispanics, the largest combination was Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander and Some Other Race (31 percent). Among non- Hispanics, similar proportions (about 28 percent each) reported the following: Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander and Asian and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander and White.

Hispanics made up 97 percent of all those classified as only Some Other Race.

Table 10 shows the Some Other Race alone-or-in-combination popu-lation (21.7 million) by Hispanic origin in the United States in 2010. Respondents who were classified as Some Other Race alone repre-sented the vast majority of the total (88 percent).

Among the 2.6 million people who reported multiple races that included Some Other Race, the most common combinations were Some Other Race and White (66 percent), followed by Some Other Race and Black (12 percent), Some Other Race and Asian (9 percent), Some Other Race and American Indian and Alaska Native (4 per-cent), and Some Other Race and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (2 percent). All other combinations including Some Other Race represented 7 percent of the Some Other Race alone-or-in- combination population.

Table 10.The Some Other Race Population and Largest Multiple-Race Combinations by Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States: 2010(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see

ww.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)w

Race

Number Percent

Percentage of Some

Other Race in

combination

SOME OTHER RACE ALONE OR IN COMBINATION

Total � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 21,748,084 100�0 (X)Some Other Race alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 19,107,368 87�9 (X)Some Other Race in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,640,716 12�1 100�0 Some Other Race; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,740,924 8�0 65�9 Some Other Race; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � � 314,571 1�4 11�9 Some Other Race; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 234,462 1�1 8�9 Some Other Race; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � 115,752 0�5 4�4 Some Other Race; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 58,981 0�3 2�2 All other combinations including Some Other Race � � � � � � � 176,026 0�8 6�7

Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 20,714,218 100�0 (X)Some Other Race alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 18,503,103 89�3 (X)Some Other Race in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,211,115 10�7 100�0 Some Other Race; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,601,125 7�7 72�4 Some Other Race; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � 227,648 1�1 10�3 Some Other Race; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 103,591 0�5 4�7 Some Other Race; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � 106,604 0�5 4�8 Some Other Race; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 46,909 0�2 2�1 All other combinations including Some Other Race � � � � � � � 125,238 0�6 5�7

Not Hispanic or Latino � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,033,866 100�0 (X)Some Other Race alone � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 604,265 58�4 (X)Some Other Race in combination � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 429,601 41�6 100�0 Some Other Race; White � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 139,799 13�5 32�5 Some Other Race; Black or African American � � � � � � � � � � 86,923 8�4 20�2 Some Other Race; Asian � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 130,871 12�7 30�5 Some Other Race; American Indian and Alaska Native � � � 9,148 0�9 2�1 Some Other Race; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 12,072 1�2 2�8 All other combinations including Some Other Race � � � � � � � 50,788 4�9 11�8

(X) Not applicable�

Note: Largest combinations based on Some Othe

Source: U�S� Census Bureau, 2010 Census RediTables P1 and P2�

In the 2010 Census, approximately 20.7 million people of Hispanic ori-gin were classified as Some Other Race either alone or in combina-tion, compared with only 1 million people of non-Hispanic origin. Nearly all of those who were classi-fied as Some Other Race alone were

r Race in-combination population�

stricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File,

of Hispanic origin (18.5 million out of 19.1 million, or 97 percent).

The majority of Hispanics classified as Some Other Race reported only one race (89 percent). However, notable reporting differences were observed for non-Hispanics. Among non-Hispanics who were classified as Some Other Race, about

Page 43: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. Census Bureau 17

42 percent reported more than one race (nearly four times higher than their Hispanic counterparts).

In 2010, among Hispanics classi-fied as Some Other Race in combi-nation with one or more additional races, the most common multiple-race group by far was Some Other Race and White (72 percent), followed by Some Other Race and Black (10 percent). Among non-Hispanics who were classified as Some Other Race and one or more additional races, the most common multiple-race combinations were more evenly distributed—Some Other Race and White (33 percent) and Some Other Race and Asian (31 percent).

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF THE MINORITY POPULATION

Nearly half of the West region’s population was minority.

In the 2010 Census, just over one-third of the U.S. population reported their race and ethnicity as something other than non-Hispanic White alone. This group, referred to as the “minority” population for this report, increased from 86.9 million

to 111.9 million between 2000 and 2010 (see Table 11). This repre-sented a growth of 29 percent over the decade. The non-Hispanic White alone population also grew over the decade, from 194.6 million to 196.8 million; however, growth was relatively slow for this population (1 percent).

In the four census regions, the pro-portion of the total population that was minority (proportion minority) ranged from about one-fifth to just under one-half of the total popula-tion in 2010.15 The minority popu-lation numbered 33.9 million (47 percent) in the West, 45.8 million (40 percent) in the South, and 17.3 million (31 percent) in the Northeast. In the Midwest, the minority population was 14.8 mil-lion and made up 22 percent of the total population.

The minority population grew in every region between 2000 and 2010, but most significantly in the South and West. The South experi-enced growth of 34 percent in its minority population. Similar growth occurred in the West, with the minority population increasing by 29 percent. The non-Hispanic White alone population also grew in the

15 The Northeast census region includes Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. The Midwest census region includes Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. The South census region includes Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. The West census region includes Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

South and West between the two decennial censuses, but at a slower rate (4 percent and 3 percent, respectively).

The minority population in the Northeast and Midwest experienced considerable growth between 2000 and 2010. The minority population grew by 21 percent in the Northeast, and the Midwest minority population grew 24 per-cent. In contrast, the non-Hispanic White alone population in both of these regions declined since 2000 (–3 percent in the Northeast and –1 percent in the Midwest).

California had the largest minority population in 2010.

In 2010, the states with the largest minority populations frequently also had the largest non-Hispanic White alone popula-tions. California led the nation with the largest minority population (22.3 million). Texas (13.7 million), New York (8.1 million), Florida (7.9 million), and Illinois (4.7 million) round out the top five states with the largest minority populations. Most of these states also had the largest non-Hispanic White alone populations—California with 15.0 million, Texas with 11.4 million, New York with 11.3 million, and Florida with 10.9 million. The state with the fifth-largest non-Hispanic White alone population in 2010 was Pennsylvania (10.1 million).

Page 44: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

18 U.S. Census Bureau

Table 11.Non-Hispanic White Alone Population and the Minority Population for the United States, Regions, States, and for Puerto Rico: 2000 and 2010(For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Area

2000 2010 Percentage change, 2000 to 2010

Total

Non- Hispanic

White alone Minority1

Per- centage

minority1 Total

Non- Hispanic

White alone Minority1

Per- centage

minority1

Non- Hispanic

White alone Minority1

United States � � � � � 281,421,906 194,552,774 86,869,132 30�9 308,745,538 196,817,552 111,927,986 36�3 1�2 28�8

REGIONNortheast � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 53,594,378 39,327,262 14,267,116 26�6 55,317,240 38,008,094 17,309,146 31�3 –3�4 21�3Midwest � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 64,392,776 52,386,131 12,006,645 18�6 66,927,001 52,096,633 14,830,368 22�2 –0�6 23�5South � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 100,236,820 65,927,794 34,309,026 34�2 114,555,744 68,706,462 45,849,282 40�0 4�2 33�6West � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 63,197,932 36,911,587 26,286,345 41�6 71,945,553 38,006,363 33,939,190 47�2 3�0 29�1

STATEAlabama � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4,447,100 3,125,819 1,321,281 29�7 4,779,736 3,204,402 1,575,334 33�0 2�5 19�2Alaska � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 626,932 423,788 203,144 32�4 710,231 455,320 254,911 35�9 7�4 25�5Arizona � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5,130,632 3,274,258 1,856,374 36�2 6,392,017 3,695,647 2,696,370 42�2 12�9 45�2Arkansas � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,673,400 2,100,135 573,265 21�4 2,915,918 2,173,469 742,449 25�5 3�5 29�5California � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 33,871,648 15,816,790 18,054,858 53�3 37,253,956 14,956,253 22,297,703 59�9 –5�4 23�5Colorado � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4,301,261 3,202,880 1,098,381 25�5 5,029,196 3,520,793 1,508,403 30�0 9�9 37�3Connecticut � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3,405,565 2,638,845 766,720 22�5 3,574,097 2,546,262 1,027,835 28�8 –3�5 34�1Delaware � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 783,600 567,973 215,627 27�5 897,934 586,752 311,182 34�7 3�3 44�3District of Columbia � � � � � � � � 572,059 159,178 412,881 72�2 601,723 209,464 392,259 65�2 31�6 –5�0Florida � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 15,982,378 10,458,509 5,523,869 34�6 18,801,310 10,884,722 7,916,588 42�1 4�1 43�3

Georgia � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8,186,453 5,128,661 3,057,792 37�4 9,687,653 5,413,920 4,273,733 44�1 5�6 39�8Hawaii � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,211,537 277,091 934,446 77�1 1,360,301 309,343 1,050,958 77�3 11�6 12�5Idaho � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,293,953 1,139,291 154,662 12�0 1,567,582 1,316,243 251,339 16�0 15�5 62�5Illinois � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 12,419,293 8,424,140 3,995,153 32�2 12,830,632 8,167,753 4,662,879 36�3 –3�0 16�7Indiana � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 6,080,485 5,219,373 861,112 14�2 6,483,802 5,286,453 1,197,349 18�5 1�3 39�0Iowa � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,926,324 2,710,344 215,980 7�4 3,046,355 2,701,123 345,232 11�3 –0�3 59�8Kansas � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,688,418 2,233,997 454,421 16�9 2,853,118 2,230,539 622,579 21�8 –0�2 37�0Kentucky � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4,041,769 3,608,013 433,756 10�7 4,339,367 3,745,655 593,712 13�7 3�8 36�9Louisiana � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4,468,976 2,794,391 1,674,585 37�5 4,533,372 2,734,884 1,798,488 39�7 –2�1 7�4Maine � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,274,923 1,230,297 44,626 3�5 1,328,361 1,254,297 74,064 5�6 2�0 66�0

Maryland � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5,296,486 3,286,547 2,009,939 37�9 5,773,552 3,157,958 2,615,594 45�3 –3�9 30�1Massachusetts � � � � � � � � � � � � 6,349,097 5,198,359 1,150,738 18�1 6,547,629 4,984,800 1,562,829 23�9 –4�1 35�8Michigan � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 9,938,444 7,806,691 2,131,753 21�4 9,883,640 7,569,939 2,313,701 23�4 –3�0 8�5Minnesota � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4,919,479 4,337,143 582,336 11�8 5,303,925 4,405,142 898,783 16�9 1�6 54�3Mississippi � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,844,658 1,727,908 1,116,750 39�3 2,967,297 1,722,287 1,245,010 42�0 –0�3 11�5Missouri � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5,595,211 4,686,474 908,737 16�2 5,988,927 4,850,748 1,138,179 19�0 3�5 25�2Montana � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 902,195 807,823 94,372 10�5 989,415 868,628 120,787 12�2 7�5 28�0Nebraska � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,711,263 1,494,494 216,769 12�7 1,826,341 1,499,753 326,588 17�9 0�4 50�7Nevada � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,998,257 1,303,001 695,256 34�8 2,700,551 1,462,081 1,238,470 45�9 12�2 78�1New Hampshire � � � � � � � � � � 1,235,786 1,175,252 60,534 4�9 1,316,470 1,215,050 101,420 7�7 3�4 67�5

New Jersey � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8,414,350 5,557,209 2,857,141 34�0 8,791,894 5,214,878 3,577,016 40�7 –6�2 25�2New Mexico � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,819,046 813,495 1,005,551 55�3 2,059,179 833,810 1,225,369 59�5 2�5 21�9New York � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 18,976,457 11,760,981 7,215,476 38�0 19,378,102 11,304,247 8,073,855 41�7 –3�9 11�9North Carolina � � � � � � � � � � � 8,049,313 5,647,155 2,402,158 29�8 9,535,483 6,223,995 3,311,488 34�7 10�2 37�9North Dakota � � � � � � � � � � � � 642,200 589,149 53,051 8�3 672,591 598,007 74,584 11�1 1�5 40�6Ohio � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 11,353,140 9,538,111 1,815,029 16�0 11,536,504 9,359,263 2,177,241 18�9 –1�9 20�0Oklahoma � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3,450,654 2,556,368 894,286 25�9 3,751,351 2,575,381 1,175,970 31�3 0�7 31�5Oregon � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3,421,399 2,857,616 563,783 16�5 3,831,074 3,005,848 825,226 21�5 5�2 46�4Pennsylvania � � � � � � � � � � � � � 12,281,054 10,322,455 1,958,599 15�9 12,702,379 10,094,652 2,607,727 20�5 –2�2 33�1Rhode Island � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,048,319 858,433 189,886 18�1 1,052,567 803,685 248,882 23�6 –6�4 31�1

South Carolina � � � � � � � � � � � 4,012,012 2,652,291 1,359,721 33�9 4,625,364 2,962,740 1,662,624 35�9 11�7 22�3South Dakota � � � � � � � � � � � � 754,844 664,585 90,259 12�0 814,180 689,502 124,678 15�3 3�7 38�1Tennessee � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5,689,283 4,505,930 1,183,353 20�8 6,346,105 4,800,782 1,545,323 24�4 6�5 30�6Texas � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 20,851,820 10,933,313 9,918,507 47�6 25,145,561 11,397,345 13,748,216 54�7 4�2 38�6Utah � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2,233,169 1,904,265 328,904 14�7 2,763,885 2,221,719 542,166 19�6 16�7 64�8Vermont � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 608,827 585,431 23,396 3�8 625,741 590,223 35,518 5�7 0�8 51�8Virginia � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 7,078,515 4,965,637 2,112,878 29�8 8,001,024 5,186,450 2,814,574 35�2 4�4 33�2Washington � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5,894,121 4,652,490 1,241,631 21�1 6,724,540 4,876,804 1,847,736 27�5 4�8 48�8West Virginia � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1,808,344 1,709,966 98,378 5�4 1,852,994 1,726,256 126,738 6�8 1�0 28�8Wisconsin � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5,363,675 4,681,630 682,045 12�7 5,686,986 4,738,411 948,575 16�7 1�2 39�1Wyoming � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 493,782 438,799 54,983 11�1 563,626 483,874 79,752 14�1 10�3 45�0

Puerto Rico � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3,808,610 33,966 3,774,644 99�1 3,725,789 26,946 3,698,843 99�3 –20�7 –2�0

1 For this report, “minority” refers to people who reported their ethnicity and race as something other than non-Hispanic White alone in the decennial census�

Sources: U�S� Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables PL1 and PL2; and 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171)Summary File, Tables P1 and P2�

Page 45: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. Census Bureau 19

Texas joined California, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, and New Mexico in having a “majority-minority” population.

In California, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, New Mexico, and Texas, the population was majority-minority (i.e., over 50 percent of the population was minority) in 2010 (see Table 11). Hawaii had the highest proportion minority (77 percent), followed by California and New Mexico, each with 60 percent. California, New Mexico, and Hawaii had a majority-minority population in 2000 as well, and this population grew 24 percent, 22 percent, and 13 percent, respectively, between 2000 and 2010. About 55 percent of Texas’ population was minor-ity in 2010, up from 48 percent in 2000. Over the decade, the minor-ity population in Texas grew by 39 percent. The District of Columbia’s population was also majority-minority (65 percent) but was down from 72 percent in 2000.

In 2010, the vast majority of the population identified as non- Hispanic White alone in four states. In the New England area, Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont all had populations that were predomi-nantly non-Hispanic White alone (94 percent, 92 percent, and 94 percent, respectively). The minor-ity population grew by at least 50 percent in each of these states between 2000 and 2010—by 66 percent in Maine, by 68 percent in New Hampshire, and by 52 percent in Vermont, which outpaced growth of the non-Hispanic White alone population (2 percent, 3 percent, and 1 percent, respectively). West Virginia also had a predominantly non-Hispanic White alone popula-tion in 2010 (93 percent). While West Virginia’s non-Hispanic White alone population increased by 1 percent over the decade, the

state’s minority population grew 29 percent.

Nevada’s minority population grew the fastest between 2000 and 2010.

There were a number of other states where significant propor-tions of the population were minor-ity. The minority population in Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, and Nevada approached 50 per-cent in 2010. Among these states, Nevada had the highest proportion minority (46 percent), followed by Maryland (45 percent), Georgia (44 percent), and Arizona and Florida (each about 42 percent).

The minority population grew in all 50 states between 2000 and 2010. Among all states, Nevada’s minority population increased the most (78 percent). Each of the five states that had a proportion minor-ity approaching 50 percent also experienced at least 30 percent growth in this population. The minority population grew by 40 percent in Georgia and by 30 per-cent in Maryland across the decade. Arizona’s and Florida’s minority population increased even more (45 percent and 43 percent, respec-tively). In the District of Columbia, the minority population declined by 5 percent.

The non-Hispanic White alone population also experienced growth between 2000 and 2010 in 35 states and the District of Columbia. Eight states and the District of Columbia had non-Hispanic White alone populations that increased at least 10 percent between the decennial censuses. The District of Columbia had the largest percentage increase in the non-Hispanic White alone popula-tion (32 percent), followed by Utah (17 percent), Idaho (16 percent), and Arizona (13 percent). Hawaii, Nevada, and South Carolina all

had about 12 percent growth in the non-Hispanic White alone population. The non-Hispanic White alone population grew by about 10 percent in North Carolina and Wyoming.

The non-Hispanic White alone population declined in 15 states between 2000 and 2010. Eleven of the states with declines in the non-Hispanic White alone population were in the Northeast and Midwest. In particular, 6 of the 9 states in the Northeast had declines in the non-Hispanic White alone popula-tion—Connecticut (–4 percent), Massachusetts (–4 percent), New Jersey (–6 percent), New York (–4 percent), Pennsylvania (–2 percent), and Rhode Island (–6 percent). The five states in the Midwest with declines in the non-Hispanic White alone population were Illinois (–3 percent), Iowa (–0.3 percent), Kansas (–0.2 percent), Michigan (–3 percent), and Ohio (–2 per-cent). Fewer states in the South saw declines in the non-Hispanic White alone population (Louisiana, –2 percent; Maryland, –4 percent; and Mississippi, –0.3 percent). California was the only state in the West with a non-Hispanic White alone population that declined (–5 percent).

In about one-tenth of all counties, the minority population composed 50 percent or more of the total population.

Out of 3,143 counties, there were 348 where at least half of the population was minority in 2010 (see Figure 4). The minor-ity population was concentrated in counties along the East coast from Massachusetts to Florida and in counties within the Gulf Coast states of Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. A band of counties where a high proportion of the population was minority stretched

Page 46: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

20

U

.S. Cen

sus Bu

reau

0 100 Miles

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables P1 and P2.

0 100 Miles

50.0 or more

36.3 to 49.9

25.0 to 36.2

10.0 to 24.9

Less than 10.0

Percentage

U.S.percent

36.3

0 200 Miles

0 50 Miles

Figure 4.

Minority Population as a Percentage of County Population: 2010(Minority refers to people who reported their ethnicity and race as something other than non-Hispanic White alone in the 2010 Census. For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Page 47: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. C

ensu

s Bureau

2

1

0 100 Miles

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables PL1 and PL2; and 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File, Tables P1 and P2. 0 100 Miles

57.6 or more

28.8 to 57.5

0.0 to 28.7

–9.9 to –0.1

Less than –9.9

Not comparable

Percentage change

U.S.change

28.8

0 100 Miles

0 50 Miles

Fewer than 1,000 minority

Figure 5.

Percentage Change in Minority Population by County: 2000 to 2010(Counties with a minority population of at least 1,000 are included in the map.Minority refers to people who reported their ethnicity and race as something other than non-Hispanic White alone in the decennial census. For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/pl94-171.pdf)

Page 48: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

22 U.S. Census Bureau

across the southwest through the states lining the U.S.-Mexico border (Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California). Additionally, counties in states along the Pacific coast, and in Hawaii and Alaska, also had high proportions of the population that were minority.

In 2010, there were 1,205 coun-ties where less than 10 percent of the population was minority. The majority of these counties were located in Appalachia, in the upper Northeast, and in the central and upper Midwest.

Growth in the minority population occurred in many counties across the nation.

The map in Figure 5 illustrates the percentage change in the minor-ity population between 2000 and 2010 for counties with a minor-ity population of at least 1,000 in 2010. Minority population growth was concentrated in counties in the Pacific Northwest, Pacific Southwest, western Arizona, southern Nevada, and areas of the interior West. Counties in the mid-Atlantic corridor, Florida, and in clusters throughout the south-eastern states also had significant growth in their minority population. Additionally, multiple groupings of counties in Texas, northern Illinois, southern Wisconsin, and southern Minnesota experienced substantial growth in their minority population between 2000 and 2010.

There were 53 counties with a minority population of at least 1,000 that experienced a decline of at least 10 percent in their minority population between 2000 and 2010. Many of these counties were located along the Mississippi River in Arkansas, Louisiana, and

Mississippi, as well as in central and western Alabama.

SUMMARY

This report presented data from the 2010 Census that illustrated the nation’s changing racial and ethnic diversity. The examination of racial and ethnic group distributions nationally shows that while the non-Hispanic White alone popula-tion is still numerically and propor-tionally the largest major race and ethnic group in the United States, it is also growing at the slowest rate. During the past 10 years, it has been the Hispanic popula-tion and the Asian population that have grown considerably, in part due to relatively higher levels of immigration.

Additional notable trends were presented in this report. The Black population, the second-largest major race group, did experience growth over the decade; however, it grew at a slower rate than all other major race groups except for White. Racial classification issues continue to persist among those who identify as Hispanic, resulting in a substantial proportion of that population being categorized as Some Other Race. People reporting more than one race was another fast-growing population and made up large proportions of the American Indian and Alaska Native population and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander popula-tion. Geographically, there are a number of areas, particularly in the South and West, that have large proportions minority, which also grew considerably between 2000 and 2010. Overall, the U.S. popu-lation has become more racially and ethnically diverse over time. Throughout the decade, the Census

Bureau will release additional infor-mation on race and Hispanic origin population groups, which will pro-vide more insights to the nation’s racial and ethnic diversity.

ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS

Why was the 2010 Census conducted?

The U.S. Constitution mandates that a census be taken in the United States every 10 years. This is required in order to determine the number of seats each state is to receive in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Why did the 2010 Census ask the questions on Hispanic origin and race?

The Census Bureau collects data on Hispanic origin and race to fulfill a variety of legislative and program requirements. Data on Hispanic origin and race are used in the leg-islative redistricting process carried out by the states and in monitoring local jurisdictions’ compliance with the Voting Rights Act. More broadly, data on Hispanic origin and race are critical for research that under-lies many policy decisions at all levels of government.

How do data from the question on Hispanic origin and race benefit me, my family, and my community?

All levels of government need information on Hispanic origin and race to implement and evalu-ate programs, or enforce laws, such as the Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, Fair Housing Act, Equal Employment Opportunity Act, and the 2010 Census Redistricting Data Program.

Both public and private organiza-tions use Hispanic origin and race

Page 49: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

U.S. Census Bureau 23

information to find areas where groups may need special services and to plan and implement educa-tion, housing, health, and other programs that address these needs. For example, a school system might use this information to design cultural activities that reflect the diversity in their community, or a business could use it to select the mix of merchandise it will sell in a new store. Census information also helps identify areas where resi-dents might need services of par-ticular importance to certain racial or ethnic groups, such as screening for hypertension or diabetes.

FOR MORE INFORMATION

For more information on race and Hispanic origin in the United States, visit the Census Bureau’s Internet site at <www.census.gov /population/www/socdemo /hispanic/hispanic.html> and <www.census.gov/population /www/socdemo/race/race.html>.

Information on confidentiality pro-tection, nonsampling error, and definitions is available at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010 /doc/pl94-171.pdf>.

Data on race and Hispanic origin from the 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File were released on a state-by-state basis. The 2010 Census redis-tricting data are available on the Internet at <http://factfinder2 .census.gov/main.html> and on DVD.

For more information on specific race and ethnic groups in the United States, go to <www.census .gov/> and click on “Minority Links.” This Web page includes information about the 2010 Census and provides links to reports based on past censuses and sur-veys focusing on the social and economic characteristics of the Hispanic or Latino, Black or African American, American Indian and

Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander populations.

Information on other population and housing topics is presented in the 2010 Census Briefs series, located on the Census Bureau’s Web site at <www.census.gov/prod /cen2010/>. This series presents information about race, Hispanic origin, age, sex, household type, housing tenure, and people who reside in group quarters.

For more information about the 2010 Census, including data prod-ucts, call the Customer Services Center at 1-800-923-8282. You can also visit the Census Bureau’s Question and Answer Center at <ask.census.gov> to submit your questions online.

Page 50: Demographic Program Comparison Rev. 10-03-12 …...• Data are pooled across 12 months, 36 months, or 60 months (1‐year, 3‐year, 5‐year) ... (see OK Dept of Commerce ACS calculator)

ContentsINTRODUCTION 1UNDERSTANDING RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN DATA FROM THE 2010 CENSUS

1The 2010 Census used established federal standards to collect and present data

on race and Hispanic origin. 1

Definition of Hispanic or Latino Origin Used in the 2010 Census 2Hispanic Origin 2Race 2RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN IN THE 2010 CENSUS 3More than half of the growth in the total population of the United States

between 2000 and 2010 was due to the increase in the Hispanic population. 3Definition of Race Categories Used in the 2010 Census 3The overwhelming majority of the total population of the United States reported

only one race in 2010. 4The Asian population grew faster than any other major race group between

2000 and 2010. 4The Hispanic population predominantly identified

as either White or Some Other Race. 5

Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders and American Indians and Alaska Natives were more likely than other groups to report multiple races. 6

Most people who reported multiple races provided exactly two races in 2010; White and Black was the largest multiple-race combination. 8

Different multiple-race reporting patterns occurred for Hispanics and non-His-panics. 8

People who identified as White were the most likely to report only one race. 10

Within the population who identified as Black, Hispanics were more likely to report multiple races than non-Hispanics. 12

Nearly half of all people who identified as American Indian and Alaska Native reported multiple races. 13

Among people who identified as Asian, 15 percent reported more than one race. 14

More than half of all people who identified as Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander reported multiple races. 15

Hispanics made up 97 percent of all those classified as only Some Other Race. 16

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF THE MINORITY POPULATION 17Nearly half of the West region’s population was minority. 17California had the largest minority population in 2010. 17Texas joined California, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, and New Mexico in

having a “majority-minority” population. 19Nevada’s minority population grew the fastest between 2000 and 2010. 19In about one-tenth of all counties, the minority population composed 50 per-

cent or more of the total population. 19Growth in the minority population occurred in many counties across the nation.

22SUMMARY 22ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS 22Why was the 2010 Census conducted? 22Why did the 2010 Census ask the questions on Hispanic origin and race? 22How do data from the question on Hispanic origin and race benefit me, my fam-

ily, and my community? 22FOR MORE INFORMATION 23