Delivering the Affordable Housing Programme Brian Johnson Chief Executive, Moat
description
Transcript of Delivering the Affordable Housing Programme Brian Johnson Chief Executive, Moat
Delivering the Affordable Housing Programme
Brian JohnsonChief Executive, Moat
Moat
• South East focus
• Mixed tenure
• Service quality
• Innovation
• Local authority relationships (60 local authorities in 2008/9, 40 today)
• Local HomeBuy Agent for Essex, Kent and Sussex
• Develop 600 new homes each year
• Number of properties:
Rented and other 13,333 Shared Ownership 4,478 Equity Loans 2,889 Total 20,700
Social and affordable rent
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
social rent affordable rent
£0
00
pe
r h
om
e
extra income fromaffordable rent
conversion of existingproperty to affordablerent
capital subsidy
Or…
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
social rent affordable rent
£0
00
pe
r h
om
e
Revenue subsidy
Capital subsidy
Is affordable rent working?
Moat• 168 conversions to affordable rent• £36,000 extra ‘subsidy’ created per new home
– (£40,000 in HCA offer)• 67% residents on benefits• No impact on void turnaround• Arrears no different to social rent
But• Not doing 4 bed properties• Capping rents at £180pw
Shared ownership
• Trends – profitability, staircasing
• Good product for South East
• Needs tweaking to promote staircasing
• We believe delivers £50,000 per home of social value
Shared Ownership
150000
155000
160000
165000
170000
175000
180000
185000
2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13
Sa
les
Va
lue
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Sa
les
va
lue
/va
lue
at
ap
pro
va
l
Sales price Sales price/value appraised
Shared Ownership
0
50
100
150
200
250
2008/9 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13
Re
de
mp
tio
ns
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Sta
irc
as
ing
redemption staircasing
This programme to 2015
• Bond funding remains buoyant
• S106 still in good supply
• Increased Moat programme size on back of rent increase
2015 and beyond
There are two issues on financing:Borrowing• Most housing associations will hit one of the three borrowing constraints in the next ten years:
1. Ability to meet interest costs (interest cover)2. Ratio of borrowing to assets (gearing)3. Ability to secure borrowing with assets
• The first is controllable by reducing costs• The second and third might be relaxed to some extent by the government guarantees but this is by no means certain
Subsidy• Subsidised housing requires subsidy! This can be capital subsidy or revenue subsidy (housing benefit)• The move towards revenue subsidy makes constraints 1 and 2 above more severe
Institutional investment?
The only attraction to institutional investors of subsidised or low end private rented sector housing is inflation linked income
We want more rented homes
CLGLet’s attract institutional investors
Treasury
It’s a “no brainer” that housing
benefit should not increase with
inflation
DWP and many government MPs
Institutional investment?
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
social rent affordable rent
Revenue subsidy
Capital subsidy
• It will only happen if housing associations take on the risk of rent inflation• Should housing associations take on that risk given that it is unpredictable?• Might the loan guarantees begin to answer that?• Do the different government departments understand the inter-dependencies?
What are the opportunities
Creating subsidy from existing homes• Rent models• Shared ownership staircasing
Local authorities• Local vehicles utilising Housing Associations and Local Authorities (HRA) surpluses', LA land, RTB receipts and HA access to funds• Operational efficiencies
Cross subsidy from other activities• Private rented or open market sale• Be very careful that risk is understood and really tested against what is appropriate• Housing Associations run to very long business cases, developers to very short ones. Their respective funding structures reflect this.
So, what should we do?
Deliver Influence
Relentlessly reduce costs Coherent housing and housing benefit policies
Sustain high credit ratingsEnd the destruction of £75k of value
in every RTB sale
Develop and deliver better integrated products that can ‘pop out’ subsidy when not needed
Work with the spirit of the welfare reforms but influence the implementation
Push our understanding of all of the potential financing options
Be very careful that we understand what risksare appropriate – avoid self-delusion
Work much more closely with others – especially local authorities
Conclusion
Current programme is going well for Moat• Schemes available• Affordable rent working• Shared ownership good• Funding fine
Future more uncertain• Some controllable elements• Better performance and relationships essential• Huge political uncertainty