Deliberation Evaluation Rubric
2
Civic Issues Forum Evaluation CONTENT WRITING QUALITY Grade Overall Assignment Goals Quality of Claim Development Of Ideas Organization Language and Conventions Excellent To Very Good Clear understanding and nuanced treatment of key assignment questions Makes claim Offers strong context for discussion Supports with references to text and class discussion Ideas are clearly supported with evidence that is: Ample Specific Logical Elaborated Clear, logical arrangement Integrated transitions Well-developed intro and conclusion Excellent command of language Precise and accurate word choice Sophisticated variation in sentence structure; interesting to read Few, if any, errors Good to Above Average Generally clear understanding Good, though not complete, treatment of key assignment questions Makes claim Offers some evidence and reference to text and class discussion General statements and evidence; Some specific examples Logical Most ideas are elaborated Clear, logical arrangement Simple transitions Generally well-developed intro and conclusion Competent command of language Varied and generally precise word choice Few errors Average to Poor On topic, but missing heart of the assignment Makes weak or confusing claim Offers little or no context and/or no reference to text and discussion Adequate Some specific reasons, examples, details Some evidence of logical arrangement Simple transitions Somewhat developed intro and conclusion Adequate command of language Appropriate word choice Some distracting errors, which do not impede full understanding Poor Does not adequately address assignment No real claim is made Does not offer context for discussion Inadequate, limited; poorly developed; repetitious Limited specific Little or no logical arrangement Missing or inadequate transitions Basic/simple command of language Word choice is mostly appropriate; some words inappropriately used
-
Upload
timothy-harper -
Category
Documents
-
view
4 -
download
0
Transcript of Deliberation Evaluation Rubric
Persuasive Essay Rubric
Civic Issues Forum Evaluation
CONTENTWRITING QUALITY
Grade Overall Assignment GoalsQuality of ClaimDevelopment
Of IdeasOrganizationLanguage and Conventions
Excellent
To Very GoodClear understanding and nuanced treatment of key assignment questionsMakes claim
Offers strong context for discussionSupports with references to text and class discussionIdeas are clearly supported with evidence that is:
Ample
Specific
Logical
ElaboratedClear, logical arrangement
Integrated transitions
Well-developed intro and conclusionExcellent command of languagePrecise and accurate word choiceSophisticated variation in sentence structure; interesting to readFew, if any, errors
Good to Above AverageGenerally clear understanding
Good, though not complete, treatment of key assignment questionsMakes claim
Offers some evidence and reference to text and class discussionGeneral statements and evidence; Some specific examples Logical
Most ideas are elaboratedClear, logical arrangement
Simple transitions
Generally well-developed intro and conclusionCompetent command of languageVaried and generally precise word choice
Few errors
Average to PoorOn topic, but missing heart of the assignmentMakes weak or confusing claim
Offers little or no context and/or no reference to text and discussionAdequate
Some specific reasons, examples, detailsSome evidence of logical arrangementSimple transitions
Somewhat developed intro and conclusionAdequate command of languageAppropriate word choice
Some distracting errors, which do not impede full understanding
PoorDoes not adequately address assignmentNo real claim is made
Does not offer context for discussionInadequate, limited;
poorly developed; repetitious
Limited specific reasons and examplesLittle or no logical arrangement
Missing or inadequate transitionsUnder-developed intro and conclusionBasic/simple command of languageWord choice is mostly appropriate; some words inappropriately usedNotable errors that impede
understanding
Notes:
