CBI Health Administrator Development Series Module 1 Generating & Maintaining Referrals.
Delaware Community Health Access Program (CHAP): Evaluation of Referrals and Health Outcomes James...
-
Upload
eustace-sherman -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Delaware Community Health Access Program (CHAP): Evaluation of Referrals and Health Outcomes James...
Delaware Community Health Access Program (CHAP): Evaluation of Referrals and
Health Outcomes
James M. Gill, MD, MPH
Christiana Care Health Services
August 21st, 2003
IntroductionIntroduction
CHAP objectives– Provide a medical home for uninsured
Delawareans, so as to improve access, quality and outcomes
– Increase primary and preventive care– Reduce hospital emergency department (ED)
visits and hospital stays– Improve health status and patient satisfaction
Methods: Part 1Methods: Part 1
Study Design– Compared changes in health care utilization
and other outcomes before CHAP enrollment and six months after enrollment
– 795 qualified enrollees
Time Period– June 2001 through January 2003
DemographicsDemographics
CHAP enrollees tend to be– Young adults (18 - 39 years of age)– Female– New Castle County– Hispanic– Non-citizens
Preventive CarePreventive Care
39.6
58.8
42.8
56.3
48.2
68.6
60.0
89.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Percen
t Up
To
Date
Cholesterol Mammogram Breast Exam Pap Smear
Baseline
Follow up
Past 5 year, ages 35+ (N=252)
Past 2 yearsages 40+(N=123)
Past 2 yearsages 18+(N=123)
Past 3 yearsages 18+(N=484
Preventive CarePreventive Care
21.1
27.7
18.6
25.0
14.2
21.2
13.318.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Pe
rce
nt U
p T
o D
ate
Flu Shot Pneumo Vax Sig/colonoscopy Blood Stool
Baseline
Follow up
Past yearages 50+ or <50 with diabetes or asthma (N=138)
Everages 65+ or
<with diabetes(N=45)
Past 5 yearsages 50+(N=104)
Past yearages 50+(N=104)
Emergency Department and Hospital Visits Emergency Department and Hospital Visits
9.9
3.8 2.7 2.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Percen
t
ED Visits Hospital Admits
Baseline
Follow UP
Satisfaction with CareSatisfaction with Care
Before CHAP Enrollment
90.8
9.2
After CHAP Enrollment
54.3
45.7
ExcellentExcellent
Methods: Part 2Methods: Part 2
Study Design– Examined referral patterns, including sources of
referrals to health homes– Identified percent seen at health homes after
enrollment– Investigated percentage already patients prior to
CHAP Time Period
– Beginning June 2001 and ending November 2002
Referred To
1.2 7.3 5.0
29.4
15
42.1
Health Home ReferralsHealth Home Referrals(N=2525)(N=2525)
Referred From
20.5
5.7
3.1
24.0
6.1
40.5
ED/Hospitals
Delmarva
HJMC
LaRed
Westside
VIPII
Percent of Referrals Leading Percent of Referrals Leading to Health Home Visitsto Health Home Visits
52.1
24.0
56.2
38.5
0102030
40506070
8090
Percen
t
Total EmergencyDept
HealthHomes
EDS/VIP
N=2116N=262 N=1841
N=13
Percent of Enrollees Who Were Patients Prior to Enrollment
50.0
27.4 28.634.5
66.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Percen
t
Total Delmarva HJMC LaRed Westside
(N=185) (N=126) (N=742) (N=1063)(N=2116)
Time Between First Pre-CHAP Time Between First Pre-CHAP Visit and CHAP EnrollmentVisit and CHAP Enrollment
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Pe
rcen
t
Total Delmarva HJMC LaRed Westside
< 2 Weeks
> 2 Weeks
(N=1057) (N=54) (N=36) (N=256) (N=711)
SummarySummaryReferrals and EnrollmentReferrals and Enrollment
Over 2500 persons enrolled in CHAP in initial 16 months– Another 400-500 enrolled in Medicaid
Largest providers LaRed and Westside Followed by VIP 2
Most captured at health homes themselves; only 21 percent at ED’s
50-60 percent of those referred to health home make visit
30-40 percent referred to health home were already patients there
SummarySummaryChanges in Health Care UtilizationChanges in Health Care Utilization
Substantial increases in some preventive care (Pap’s, mammograms, cholesterol)
Small impact on CRC screening and adult immunizations
Significant reductions in ED visits, but not hospitalizations
Dramatic improvements in satisfaction with care
CaveatsCaveats Short time frame: establishing medical
home takes longer to accrue benefits Not able to capture all benefits; may have
less unnecessary care and fewer medication errors by shifting care from ED to primary care
Medical home is essential but not sufficient for optimal care
CRC screening may require additional interventions (e.g., education, payment)
Future DirectionsFuture Directions New CHAP data collection tool
– Impact on efficiency and cost Continue to monitor Colorectal Cancer
Screening, PAPs and Mammograms Evaluate CHAP as part of overall uninsured
in DE– Colorectal Cancer Screening– Women’s Health
Demographics (N=795)
Number Percent Number Percent
AgeUnder 1818-3940-6465+
85523172
14
10.765.921.7
1.8
Income0-100% Poverty100-125125-150150-175175-200
402183120
5732
50.623.015.1
7.24.0
GenderMaleFemale
CitizenshipUS CitizenNon Citizen
227568
144651
28.671.4
18.181.9
CountyNew CastleKentSussex
55656
183
69.97.0
23.0
Race/EthnicityWhiteBlackAsian/Pacific IslanderHispanicOther
7075
8620
13
8.99.51.0
78.91.7
Health HomeClaymontDelmarvaHJMCLa RedVIP IIWestside
183715
17170
484
2.34.71.9
21.58.8
60.9