Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling...

18
José M. García del Barrio 1 y 2 , David Sánchez de Ron 1 , Sonia Roig 3 1INIA-CIFOR (Madrid) 2 IuFOR (UVA-INIA) 3 UPM (Madrid) Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling components of vascular plant species diversity. World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016 Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Transcript of Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling...

Page 1: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

José M. García del Barrio1 y 2, David Sánchez de Ron1,

Sonia Roig3

1INIA-CIFOR (Madrid)

2 IuFOR (UVA-INIA)

3 UPM (Madrid)

Dehesa habitats and dehesa

landscapes. Disentangling

components of vascular plant

species diversity.

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Page 2: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Dehesa habitat

Page 3: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

Dehesa landscape

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Dense dehesaForest ?

Rural path ?Olive grovepastures

Shrub land

Page 4: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Aims

• Evaluate the biological diversity of vascular plants at different scales, from dehesa habitat to dehesa landscape.

• Determine how each land use contribute to diversity at municipality scale.

• Compare the diversity of four municipalities in relation with climatic type and agro-pastoral uses.

Page 5: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Study sites

• Four

municipalities in

western Spain

where dehesas

are the main

land use.

• Covering the

entire climatic

range were

dehesas are

actually located.

Page 6: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Methods

• Vegetation quantitative sampling

• Calculation of Hill’s numbers (H: 0, 1, 2)

for estimation of α,γ and β diversity

(municipalities and land uses).

• Performing diversity profiles (municipalities

and land uses).

• Comparison of diversity at dehesa habitat

and dehesa landscape scales.

Page 7: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

Sampling procedure

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

• Plots were randomly selected after a previous

stratification by main land uses of each

municipality performed on the basis of the

Spanish Forest Map (MFE50).

• Quantitative sampling of herbaceous, shrub and

tree species in each plot of 20 x 50 m2.

• All the plots in each municipality were sampled

only once in the spring, at the time of peak

flowering.

• The determination of species was conduced

following Iberian Flora updates and Anthos

(www.Anthos.es).

Page 8: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

Whittaker multi-scale plot modified

20x 50 m2

Area 1000 m2

Area 10 m2

Area 1 m2

Area 100 m2

5 x20 m2

2 x 5 m2

0.5 x 2 m2

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Page 9: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Diversity indices and diversity profiles

• 0H species richness, list of species

• 1H exponential Shannon index,

common species.

• 2H inverse of Simpson

concentration, abundant species.

Calculated diversity

indices were Hill numbers

or effective number of

species (qD) for (q= 0, →1

y 2), following the formula:

Page 10: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Results municipalities

Page 11: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Results municipalities

• The four municipalities harbors 564 species 136 of which are common species and 51 abundant species.

• Gamma accumulated reflected a gradient with Oropesa at the top and Zorita at the bottom for species richness (287 versus 248),common species (90. 37 versus 58.16) and abundant species (46.12 versus 26.76).

• Climatic gradient is not apparently significate for diversity because Oropesa and Zorita, the most distant in gamma values, belongs to the same climatic type II.

Page 12: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Results main land uses

Rarefaction

8 samples

Page 13: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Results main land uses

Rarefaction at 12 samples

More than 90 % of species

found

Page 14: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Results unique species by land uses

• Dehesa habitat includes 58 % of species found in landscapes with 8 % of unique species. Similarly forest habitat includes 55 % of landscape species with 6 % of unique species.

• Linear elements like water courses and rural paths harbors 70 % of species with a unique species proportion of 18 %.

• Rest of land uses like scrublands and pastures harbors similar proportion of species (55 %) than dehesa habitat and forest with the same rate of unique species (6 %).

Page 15: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Conclusions

• Dehesa landscapes are agro-silvo-pastoral systems with four main vegetation habitats; dehesas, forests, different types of linear features and other lands uses (pastures, meadows and scrublands mainly).

• Local species richness (α) elsewhere is high ( 77.1 ± 4.2) with only less local values in marginal areas of other land uses (56.4 ± 3.7).

• Diversity of dehesa habitat decrease from local to regional scale showing the lowest β values of all land uses or, in other words, dehesas are very similar in composition along its distribution area regardless of the climate or the substrate.

• Low levels of human intervention and the heterogeneity of land uses enhance the existence of a network of edge areas and linear features where are located seven out of ten of the species of vascular plants that we can find in these sylvo-pastoral landscapes, being at least 25% of them so common to be able to recolonize other adjacent land uses.

Page 16: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

Funding

- Proyecto SC00-042. Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad

Agroambiental en la Planificación Rural: Estudios Piloto de Sistemas

Agrosilvopastorales Españoles.

-AGL2005-06648-C02-02. La planificación del paisaje en los Planes de Ordenación

de Recursos Forestales (PORFs) con el mantenimiento o mejora de la

biodiversidad como objetivo. BIOFORLAN

- SUM2006-00034-C02. El sistema agroforestal dehesa como sumidero

de carbono: hacia un modelo conjunto de la vegetación y el suelo.

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Page 17: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

Some publications

- Ortega, M., Elena-Rosselló R. y García del Barrio J. M (2004). Plant diversity at landscape level: A

methodological approach applied to three Spanish rural areas. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Vol 95 (1-3), pp. 97-116.

- García del Barrio J. M, Ortega, M. y Elena-Rosselló R. (2004). Contribution of structural elements to

plant diversity in Mediterranean forests landscapes. In Andersson, F, Birot, Y. y Päivinen, R. (eds) Towards

the sustainable use of Europe´s forests – Forest Ecosystem and landscape research: Scientific challenges

and opportunities. EFI. Proceedings Series nº 49. pp 249-258.

- García del Barrio, J. M, Ortega, M., Vázquez de la Cueva, A. y Elena-Rosselló, R (2006). The influence

of linear elements on plant species diversity of Mediterranean rural landscapes: Assessment of different

indices and statistical approaches. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Vol 119 Number 1-3 pp

137-159.

- García del Barrio, J. M., de Miguel, J., Ortega, M., Sánchez de Ron, D. y Ferreras, C. (2010). Diversidad

regional y biogeografía: Metodología para el seguimiento de la diversidad de plantas vasculares en

comarcas forestales. Biogeografía. Una ciencia para la conservación del medio. VI Congreso Español de

Biogeografía. Alicante. Pags 55-64.

- García del Barrio, J. M., Alonso Ponce, R., Benavides, R. and Roig, S. (2014). Species richness and

similarity of vascular plants in the Spanish dehesas at two spatial scales. Forest Systems 23(1): 111-119.

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30

Page 18: Dehesa habitats and dehesa landscapes. Disentangling …silvopastoral2016.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WG_9_3_D… · Evaluación Territorial de la Sostenibilidad Agroambiental

Thank you

World Congress Silvo-pastoral Systems 2016

Évora (Portugal) September 27-30